Turning ‘we don’t report’ into ‘we do’

By Bahar Gidwani

 

We were recently invited by our friends at Trucost to moderate a webinar with the above title.  Our shared goal was to encourage more companies to start reporting their sustainability performance.

 

You can download the webinar from the Trucost site, here.  However, I thought I’d share a few of the things I learned from preparing for the talk and from the other panelists.

 

I started the webinar by sharing some figures from the CSRHub database.  I showed the audience that only 30% of companies in developing countries outside the US are using one of the three main reporting systems (the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), the Carbon Disclosure Project (now CDP), and the UN Global Compact or UNGC).  US companies lag far behind—with only about 10% of the companies we track reporting via these systems.

 

 

I didn’t spend a lot of time during the webinar bragging about this data.  However, I was pretty proud to see that our coverage has now grown to the point where we can start to make broad, worldwide statements about corporate social performance.  We currently cover more than 7,300 companies in 93 countries.  Other sources have claimed that “reporting is rising rapidly” and that “90% of large companies are reporting.”  If we take the term “large company” to include those over $100 billion in revenue, these statements are true.  However, when we look at companies between $100 million and $1 billion (which most people would still consider “large”), reporting remains quite weak.

 

The next speaker was Lorinda Rowledge, who is one of the founders of EKOS International.  Over the past 17 years, Lorinda has helped many large companies take their first steps towards reporting their performance.  Among other things, she offered this set of insights into the benefits of making an initial report.

 

 

Our third speaker was James Salo of Trucost.  Jamie uses Trucost’s proprietary models (some of which he helped build) to improve company understand of their environmental performance.  He showed the audience this great example of how a company could use the data it gathers through a reporting process to help visualize its competitive position.

 

 

After we shared our slides, we took questions and comments from the audience.  In particular, there remains confusion about new standards for reporting such as those being proposed by SASB and the IIRC.  We agreed that we are happy to see the quality of reporting improved by these efforts—as long as they don’t discourage or confuse companies who are just starting on their journey into reporting.

 


Bahar Gidwani is CEO and Co-founder of CSRHub.  He has built and run large technology-based businesses for many years. Bahar holds a CFA, worked on Wall Street with Kidder, Peabody, and with McKinsey & Co. Bahar has consulted to a number of major companies and currently serves on the board of several software and Web companies. He has an MBA from Harvard Business School and an undergraduate degree in physics and astronomy. Bahar is a member of the SASB Advisory Board.  He plays bridge, races sailboats, and is based in New York City.

CSRHub provides access to corporate social responsibility and sustainability ratings and information on 7,300+ companies from 135 industries in 93 countries. By aggregating and normalizing the information from 200 data sources, CSRHub has created a broad, consistent rating system and a searchable database that links millions of rating elements back to their source. Managers, researchers and activists use CSRHub to benchmark company performance, learn how stakeholders evaluate company CSR practices and seek ways to change the world.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Will “Resilience” Be Our Saving Grace?

By Carol Pierson Holding

 

Last week, the wine-making town of Sebastopol became the second California city aftersolar resilience Lancaster to require that solar panels be installed in all new building construction.

 

Among the driving forces for Sebastopol’s solar are local realtors, who are going door to door, selling the program as a safeguard against power loss and rising prices. Sustainability is still a strong motivation for some in this liberal-leaning town, but it is resilience that’s motivating support from local business people.

 

The anti-solar forces supported by Heritage Foundation and Fox News’ claim that California will face more rolling black-outs from the state’s increasing reliance on renewable energy. But watching the two sides duke it out on Fox Business, it looks to this viewer like Fox’s tactic could backfire in the face of the very real resilience of renewable power.

 

I’ll bet you’ll hear more about “resilience.” In the past, the “sustainability” movement has struggled with language. “Global warming.” “Climate change.” “Rising Sea Levels.” And perhaps the most problematic, “Sustainability” itself.

 

An apt analogy can be found on the Internet.  In 1992, when I first started working with Cisco on language around its new field “Internetworking,” company officials were firm about building a business category around a term that underscored their technical elitism. Back then, Internetworking accurately described what was as obscure as rocket science. Cisco engineers literally scoffed at those who couldn’t understand their equipment’s technology.

 

Language was holding back the Information Superhighway even as the world was pushing them to build it.

 

When Cisco realized the market limitations that the whole “Internetworking” approach was putting on the company’s growth, they finally accepted their place as part of a “networking.”

 

Like “Internetworking,” “Sustainability” is cumbersome and hard to understand. It doesn’t speak to a problem real people have. It’s for the insiders.

 

So what is the environmental movement’s equivalent of “networking?” Is “resilience” the word that can expand “sustainability” beyond the movement’s core?

 

Kevin Dingle, President of Sustaining Structures, says that the buzz in corporate real estate is all around “resilience.” Business is booming. Legislation like energy benchmarking helps, as does the promise of lower energy bills. LEED construction and Energy Star for Buildings  are considered good for Corporate Social Responsibility, in other words, for traditional sustainability reasons.

 

But the key differentiator for renewable energy in buildings has moved on from Sustainability. Now the hot pitch is resilience.

 

Dingle credits Superstorm Sandy and other natural disasters for this shift. Power was out in downtown Manhattan for a full week in some places while a central station dried out and came back on line. Solar can provide an effective, on-site power back-up, or resiliency, that commercial and residential customers want.

 

In April, the American Solar Energy Society conference in Baltimore featured the idea of resiliency in their plenary panel “Climate and Resiliency.” The conference’s lead press release emphasized the same idea, “Renewable energy provides resiliency for communities in the face of climate-related weather disasters.”

 

The U.S. Department of Energy has initiated a program to improve electric grid reliability and resiliency in part through wind and solar.

 

A pro-solar web site is called Resilience.org.

 

Language creates our reality. Sustainability has been driving the environmental world for some years. Maybe I’m alone in this, but when I hear the word, my automatic reaction is “How long can we sustain this?” It brings to mind the phrase “Dark Optimism” coined by a UK environmental radical Shaun Chamberlin to describe the force he wants to corral to protest for climate change.

 

In stark contrast, the word resiliency is filled with light and hope, signifying a rebounding or springing back. Just when so many are so despondent about the environment, new language arrives to save us. It reminds us of the dawn of the Internet, when words like “internetworking” were slowing acceptance of what was to become a life-changing transformation.

 

Photo courtesy of  Dept of Energy Solar Decathlon via Flickr CC.

 


 

Carol Pierson Holding writes on environmental issues and social responsibility for policy and news publications, including the Carnegie Council’s Policy Innovations, Harvard Business Review, San Francisco Chronicle, India Time, The Huffington Post and many other web sites. Her articles on corporate social responsibility can be found on CSRHub.com, a website that provides sustainability ratings data on 7,300 companies worldwide. Carol holds degrees from Smith College and Harvard University.

 

CSRHub provides access to corporate social responsibility and sustainability ratings and information on 7,300+ companies from 135 industries in 91 countries. By aggregating and normalizing the information from 200 data sources, CSRHub has created a broad, consistent rating system and a searchable database that links millions of rating elements back to their source. Managers, researchers and activists use CSRHub to benchmark company performance, learn how stakeholders evaluate company CSR practices and seek ways to change the world.

 

 

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Top Companies Tie Compensation to Sustainability

By Guest Blogger, Keith Patterson

 

 

Companies commonly base executive compensation on performance, but a growing number of businesses have started associating top leaders’ pay rates and bonuses to achieving corporate environmental goals. In essence, initiatives such as reducing energy use can lead to higher compensation for those in the corner offices.

 

According to a 2013 joint report done by the Investor Responsibility Research Center and the Sustainable Investments Institute, 43 percent of Fortune 500 companies link executive pay to sustainability. These incentives are helping companies across the world accelerate green goals and reduce carbon footprints.

 

Caterpillar

 

In recent years Caterpillar, a worldwide manufacturer of construction and mining equipment, has dedicated itself to corporate sustainability. As motivation for senior executives to reach these goals, the company has started tying compensation to sustainability performance. In 2011, a reported 84 percent of Caterpillar’s executive officers had compensation tied to the company’s performance.

 

Caterpillar has lofty environmental goals, such as a 20 percent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions and a 25 percent increase of energy efficiency by 2020. But in some cases, it has already exceeded these goals. According to its annual report, the company has surpassed its energy efficiency goals by 22 percent by 2012. Part of this achievement is based on Caterpillar’s dedication to renewable energy resources. In 2012, 18.2 percent of the company’s energy was comes from green energy.

 

In addition, Caterpillar has made a commitment to follow LEED standards for all new construction worldwide. LEED is the international standard for sustainable construction, design and maintenance. These buildings will focus on energy efficiency as well as reduced waste.

 

Intel

 

In the world of technology, Intel is a leading computer and processor manufacturer. But in terms of the green movement, the company is leaps and bounds ahead of most companies in sustainability initiatives.

 

 

Intel has been linking sustainability and compensation for its CEO and top leaders since 2008. In addition, all employee bonuses are tied to its green goals. The company encourages its employees to find new ways to innovate sustainability at work and recognizes successful staff with its Intel Environmental Excellence Awards. Employees who received the award in 2010 collectively saved the company $136 million.

 

By 2010, the company reduced its emissions by 40 percent, saved more than $5 million through recycling programs and created more energy-efficient products for customers. To further limit its carbon footprint, Intel committed to purchasing 2.5 billion kWh worth of renewable energy credits, which will offset 85 percent of the company’s energy use. According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, that’s enough clean energy to power 218,000 homes!

 

Shell

 

Though you may not think one of the world’s leading energy and gasoline companies would be green, Shell  has some impressive sustainability standards. The company makes the environment a performance evaluation criterion for its 87,000 employees worldwide, including upper level executives.  Shell’s employees are evaluated for individual and team efforts for accomplishing the company’s green goals. Their performance in these initiatives is directly related to their annual bonus amount.

 

As part of its sustainability commitment, Shell works to provide energy-efficient alternatives to its customers around the world. As a major producer of oil and gas, Shell has a significant investment in alternative fuels and research for renewable options. In the past five years, the company spent $2.2 billion to develop alternative energy. Additionally, the company has increasingly used natural gas as a cleaner-burning fuel than coal to create energy.

 

Shell is significantly invested in wind energy, with wind farms located in Europe and North America. The company estimates that its emission-free generation of electricity eliminates more than 1 million tons of carbon dioxide from entering the atmosphere.

 

Photo courtesy of AMagill via Flickr CC.

 


 

Keith Patterson is a copy writer for EnergySavings.com and freelance blogger on energy innovation and design for the greater good. Follow him on Twitter: @kcpatterson711

 

CSRHub provides access to corporate social responsibility and sustainability ratings and information on 7,000+ companies from 135 industries in 91 countries. By aggregating and normalizing the information from 200 data sources, CSRHub has created a broad, consistent rating system and a searchable database that links millions of rating elements back to their source. Managers, researchers and activists use CSRHub to benchmark company performance, learn how stakeholders evaluate company CSR practices and seek ways to change the world.

 

Tagged , , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

CSRHub Partner Events Update

CSRHub members span the globe.  We often share US conference info–we want to share a partner conference opportunity outside the U.S., as well.
 

CUHK

 

 

 

 

The CUHK MBA CSR Conference, “CSR as a Growth Model for a Sustainable Asia” is right around the corner, May 6th in Hong Kong at the Hong Kong Convention & Exhibition Center. See the conference details  link for more information.

 

CSRHub members can enjoy 30% discount off the ticket price using promo code: CSRHub_discount when they register here.

 

 

BMW Sustainability Hackathon

 

 

The BMW Sustainability Hackathon was a great success!! 2 prize winners used the CSRHub API, Wastegram & GreenCuisine.

 

The BMW Sustainabilty Hackathons look for technical as well as non-technical people to build apps, mobile apps and hacks to address some of the most pressing problems in sustainability facing our future as a greener planet.

 

CSRHub was pleased to support the April Sustainability Hackathon. It was hosted by BMW Group Technology Office USA in Mountain View, CA. The event was a huge success, with 15 app submissions, and over $3000 given away in prizes!

 

Ronan Brennan from the BMW Group told us, “We surveyed the hackers and 2 submissions claimed use of CSRHub’s APIs and both were prizewinners!”
Wastegram : https://www.hackerleague.org/hackathons/sustainability-hackathon-mv/hacks/wastegram
Green Cuisine : https://www.hackerleague.org/hackathons/sustainability-hackathon-mv/hacks/green-cuisine

 

A full list of prizes and winners is here:

https://www.hackerleague.org/hackathons/sustainability-hackathon-mv/wikipages/511eb98b9989c5b204000016

 


 

CSRHub provides access to corporate social responsibility and sustainability ratings and information on 7,000+ companies from 135 industries in 91 countries. By aggregating and normalizing the information from 200 data sources, CSRHub has created a broad, consistent rating system and a searchable database that links millions of rating elements back to their source. Managers, researchers and activists use CSRHub to benchmark company performance, learn how stakeholders evaluate company CSR practices and seek ways to change the world.

Tagged , , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

CSRHub Invites You to the BBB Forum on Corporate Responsibility – NYC

CSRHub members can enjoy a 40% discount to the following conference by selecting the “BBB Accredited Businesses and National Partners, Event Supporters, and Charities” option when registering.

The Education and Research Foundation of the Better Business Bureau of Metropolitan New York invites you to attend

 

 

COST

BBB Accredited Businesses
and National Partners,
Event Supporters,
and Charities

— $90 Early Bird Rate Until
May 10, $95 after that

Non BBB Accredited, Others

— $160 Early Bird Rate until
May 10, $165 after that

Deadline for cancellations
with refunds — May 29

 

INFORMATION

Heather Layland
Program Associate
212.358.2829 or
hlayland@newyork.bbb.org

MAJOR SPONSORS

Ernst & Young Logo

Popular Community Bank Logo

BENEFACTOR SPONSOR

NYSE Euronext Logo

FRIEND SPONSOR

Goodwill: NY/NJ Logo

MEDIA SUPPORTER

Corporate Responsibility Magazine Logo

At the sixth BBB Forum, thought leaders will present insights about how corporate responsibility priorities and practices are changing in response to evolving business needs and public pressures.

Register now to:

• Hear the latest thinking about the evolving corporate responsibility scene.

• Learn how a corporate journey through changing expectations benefited the business.

• Get insights about trends and megatrends that are shaping business opportunities.

• Discover key features of shareholder-sponsored proposals on environmental and social issues.

• Explore new ideas about goal-setting and social impact assessment.

• And more…

Speakers will include:

Kim Jeffery, Chairman, Nestlé Waters North America

Mike Lawrence, Chief Reputation Officer & Executive Vice President, Cone Communications

Diana Glassman, Head of Environmental Affairs, TD Bank U.S.

Christopher T. Lloyd, Executive Director, Public Policy and Corporate Responsibility, Verizon Communications

Louise Raymond, Vice President, Corporate Responsibility & Sustainability, The McGraw-Hill Companies

David Vidal, Senior Fellow, The Conference Board Initiative on Sustainability

Kellie Huennekens, Assistant Director, Corporate Governance Center, Ernst & Young, LLP

Laura Gitman, Managing Director, Advisory Services, BSR

(List in formation)

Seating is limited, advance registration is required.

Event Supporters:

Advertising Self-Regulatory Council, American Sustainable Business Council, BSR, Council of Better Business Bureaus, CSRHub, CSRWire, Ethics and Compliance Officer Association, Forum for the Future, Governance & Accountability Institute, Inc., Manhattan Chamber of Commerce, Net Impact NYC, New York Society of Association Executives, NYCharities.org, Sustainability Practice Network, The Robert Zicklin Center for Corporate Integrity. (List in formation)

Click to Register

Cancellation Policy: If you register, need to cancel, and wish to request a refund, please notify us in writing by email to hlayland@newyork.bbb.org no later than 5:00 PM on Wednesday, May 29, 2013. We regret that we will not be able to offer refunds after that time, and likewise, cannot re-apply registration fees for this event to other purposes. You may send a substitute attendee in your place if necessary; we ask that you give us advance notice of the change if at all possible, to ensure a smooth event check-in process for your attendee. Thank you!

Tagged , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.