CSRHub is the world’s largest CSR (corporate social responsibility) and sustainability ratings and information database.

Telefónica is a leader in the telecommunication sector, providing communication, information and entertainment solutions, with presence in Europe, Africa and Latin America.

Ticker: TEF-MC ISIN: ES0178430E18
Address: Distrito C - Edificio Oeste 2, Ronda de la Comunicaci?n s/n , Spain , Madrid , MAD , 28020 Website: Telefonica SA
Phone #: 34-91-482-8760 CSR Web Area: SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Basic Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Ratings

  Overall Community Employees Environment Governance
Telefonica SA 62 63 66 66 50
Telecommunications
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
All company average 55 55 56 58 52
Spain
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Percentile Rankings

Rankings are in percentile terms, compared to other companies in the same industry and country Overall Community Employees Environment Governance
Telefonica SA 85% 82% 82% 76% 38%
Telecommunications
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Spain
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Special Issues:

Ratings History

Only subscribers can interact with the graph.

More CSR Rating Details

  Community Employees
Community Dev & Philanthropy Product Human Rights & Supply Chain Compensation & Benefits Diversity & Labor Rights Training, Health & Safety
Telefonica SA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Telecommunications
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
All company average 53 54 55 58 55 55
Spain
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Environment Governance
Energy & Climate Change Environmant Policy & Reporting Resource Management Board Leadership Ethics Transparency & Reporting
Telefonica SA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Telecommunications
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
All company average 57 58 57 50 55 51
Spain
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Percentile rankings

Rankings are in percentile terms, compared to other companies in the same industry and country Community Employees
Community Dev & Philantrophy Product Human Rights & Supply Chain Compensation & Benefits Diversity & Labor Rights Training, Health & Safety
Telefonica SA 81% 73% 84% 63% 80% 90%
Telecommunications
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Spain
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Environment Governance
Energy & Climate Change Environment Policy & Reporting Resource Management Board Leadership Ethics Transparency & Reporting
Telefonica SA 85% 86% 55% 28% 35% 72%
Telecommunications
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Spain
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

0 Special Issues Affect This Company (see a list of issues here)

# of Sources
Telecommunications
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Overall database
Spain
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

CSRHub Has 58 Data Sources (30 Are Currently Active) for This Company

= sources impacting the current ratings
= sources not impacting the current ratings, but included in earlier ratings for this company
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Original Data Values

(unsubscribed users can see the list, subscribers can see the data details for most sources)

Data source name

Data source element name Minimum value Value provided by datasource Maximum value Data description
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Brand Value / Enterprise Value (%) -48.164682123 0.1179 316.6056 NA
Brand Value 2012 2504.3302 NA
BSI 50 73.3928 88.4717 NA
Domicile SPAIN NA
Enterprise Value NA 28222.0031 NA NA
Reviewed ? YES NA
Sector Communications NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Brand Value 2013 11.095 7355.5185 67875.2014 NA
Domicile SPAIN NA
Sector Communications NA
Reviewed RK NA
Brand Rating 2013 BBB AA+ AAA+ NA
Enterprise Value 2013 0 74321.8645 435750.9811
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Brand Value / Enterprise Value (%) 0.009 0.1602 1.07 NA
Brand Value 2014 10 7355.4452 87304 A brand strength is assessed by using our Brand Strength Index framework. This benchmarks the strength, risk and future potential of a brand relative to its competitors by assessing input measures, brand equity measures, and output performance across four
BSI 51.3 79.8749 94.2 NA
Domicile SPAIN NA
Enterprise Value 2014 66 76055.8484 526619 NA
Sector Communications NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
0. Further Information NA NA NA NA
0.1. Introduction - Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. NA Telefónica is one of the world leaders integrated operator in the telecommunication sector, providing communication, information and entertainment solutions, with presence in Europe, Africa and Latin America. It operates in 25 countries. As of December 20 NA NA
5.1e Identified climate change risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments? NA Yes NA NA
5.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA OR1. Fin.Imp: The estimation of the reputational impact of any climate change risk should be based on a qualitative methodology and on the methodology used by Telefónica which is based on indexes (i.e; DJSI), researches and RepTrack Model, which is a mode NA NA
5.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
5.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
5.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
6. Attachments NA NA NA NA
6. Further Information NA NA NA NA
6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Opportunities driven by changes in regulation; Opportunities driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA NA
6.1a Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in regulation? NA Yes NA NA
6.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA RO1, RO2 & RO3. Fin.Imp: The financial implications will be associated to reduced CAPEX & OPEX costs as we will be ready to meet any regulation without any non-planned investment in energy or CO2 reduction practices. We are able to define financing models NA NA
6.1c Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in physical climate parameters? NA Yes NA NA
14. Attachments NA NA NA NA
6.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA PO1: Fin. Imp: There is a financial implication in costs reductions of disasters with the implementation of preventive measures. In addition, there is an opportunity to share and create products and services related to Climate conditions monitoring throug NA NA
6.1e Identified opportunities that are driven by changes in other climate-related developments? NA Yes NA NA
6.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA OO1: Fin.Imp: It is difficult to cuantify the benefits that increased reputation in Green ICT can have in Telefónica. Anyway, we have percieved an increase of demand of services from Telefónica in the areas of energy efficiency especially in cities due NA NA
13. Attachments NA NA NA NA
11. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/27/18427/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/11.EmissionsScope2Contractual/Renewable Certification Ireland 2011.pdf NA NA
11. Further Information NA Note 12.2a: The German energy certificates are issued only in the native language. NA NA
11.1. Do you consider that the grid average factors used to report Scope 2 emissions in Question 8.3 reflect the contractual arrangements you have with electricity suppliers? NA Yes NA NA
11.1a. You may report a total contractual Scope 2 figure in response to this question. Please provide your total global contractual Scope 2 GHG emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 0 NA 17902000 NA
11.2. Has your organization retired any certificates, e.g. Renewable Energy Certificates, associated with zero or low carbon electricity within the reporting year or has this been done on your behalf? NA Yes NA NA
3.1e. Please explain (i) why not; and (ii) forecast how your emissions will change over the next five years NA NA NA NA
3.2. Does the use of your goods and/or services directly enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party? No Yes Yes NA
3.2a. Please provide details (see guidance) NA Telefónica has a global strategy of Green ICT services focused in the development of integrated solutions that could be used globally for developed and developing countries. Green ICT services must give answers for eco-efficiency and climate change mitiga NA NA
3.3c Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities. 0 4 12 NA
3.3c. What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities? NA Dedicated budget for energy efficiency, Financial optimization calculations, Compliance with regulatory requirements/standards, Employee engagement NA NA
5. Attachments NA NA NA NA
5. Further Information NA NA NA NA
5.1. Have you identified any climate change risks (current or future) that have potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Risks driven by changes in regulation; Risks driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA NA
5.1a Identified risks driven by changes in regulation? NA NA NA NA
5.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA RR1. Fin.Imp: Anticipated investment in emissions reduction activities & energy efficient technologies planned for 2014-15 (around €15-20 million). Human resources would be needed if targets are set forcing us to increase our structure on a global and loc NA NA
14. Further Information NA NA NA NA
1.1. Where is the highest level of direct responsibility for climate change within your company? No individual or committee with overall responsibility for climate change Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board NA
1.1a. Please identify the position of the individual or name of the committee with this responsibility NA The Committee in charged of climate change in Telefónica is the Climate Change and Energy Efficiency Office (CC&EEO), which reports to the Executive Board, the Operations Committee, and the Reputation and Human Resources Committee. The strategy managed by NA NA
1.2. Do you provide incentives for the management of climate change issues, including the attainment of targets? No Yes Yes NA
13. Further Information NA NA NA NA
13.1. How do your absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year compare to the previous year? Increased Decreased Decreased NA
13.1a (i) If absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) have increased, decreased or remained the same overall compared to the previous year, state direction of change NA Slightly Decreased NA NA
13.1a (ii) If absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) have increased, decreased or remained the same overall compared to the previous year, state the reason for the direction of change NA Decrease: Emissions reduction activities, Increase: Change in physical operating conditions, Decrease: Change in boundary NA NA
13.1a (iii) If emissions have increased, decreased or remained the same overall, provide the emissions value (%) NA Decrease: 19, Increase: , Emission value for which direction is not stated: NA NA
2012 Score 0 92 100 NA
2012 Performance Band E B A NA
2.3a. Please explain (i) the engagement process and (ii) actions you are advocating NA The policy engagement we carry out for climate change mitigation and adaptation is part of the global Green ICT positioning strategy, which aims the positioning of Telefónica as a Green ICT company leader in the digital world. It is driven mainly because NA NA
8.8. Are carbon dioxide emissions from the combustion of biologically sequestered carbon (i.e. carbon dioxide emissions from burning biomass/biofuels) relevant to your company? No Yes Yes NA
8.8a. Please provide the emissions in metric tonnes CO2e 0.01 1099.15 27263000 NA
Management 4. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/27/18427/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/4.Communication/Annual Report 2011.pdf NA NA
Management 4. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? NA 6 NA NA
5.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA All the physical climate change riks are conceived within the operational riks of Telefonica. Each country has the mandate to assess the risk, do the economic valoration of it and establish the risk management plan. PR1: Fin.Imp: These risks could affect NA NA
2. Attachments NA NA NA NA
2. Further Information NA NA NA NA
5.1c Identified climate change risks driven by change in physical climate parameters? NA Yes NA NA
2.1. Please select the option that best describes your risk management procedures with regard to climate change risks and opportunities NA Integrated into multi-disciplinary company wide risk management processes NA NA
2.1a. Please provide further details (see guidance) NA a) Scope of process Telefónica has a global integrated risk management process since the year 2007 to define the risks and opportunities with the most serious impact on the Company’s strategic and operational targets. b) & c) How risks/opportunities are NA NA
2.2. Is climate change integrated into your business strategy? No Yes Yes NA
2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes (see guidance) NA Telefónica has an integrated approach on energy, carbon and climate change, with three converging objectives with short and long term view. 1) to foster internal energy efficiency and GHG emissions reduction year by year while the business grow, 2) to inc NA NA
2.2b. Please explain why not NA NA NA NA
2.3. Do you engage with policy makers to encourage further action on mitigation and/or adaptation? No Yes Yes NA
3. Attachments NA NA NA NA
3. Further Information NA NA NA NA
3.1. Did you have an emissions reduction target that was active (ongoing or reached completion) in the reporting year? No Intensity target Absolute and intensity targets NA
14.1. Do you participate in any emission trading schemes? No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next two years No, but we anticipate doing so in the next two years Yes NA
14.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? No Yes Yes NA
6.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
6.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
6.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
7. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/27/18427/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/7.EmissionsMethodology/Q7.4 Emissions Factors_Telefonica .xls NA NA
7. Further Information NA Q7.4: Attached you will find the emissions factors that Telefonica uses to calculate the GHG inventory. Telefonica uses mainly two calculation tools from GHG Protocol: - Cross sector tool (September 2011) GHG PROTOCOL for all countries except Brazil - Fer NA NA
7.1. Please provide your base year and base year emissions (Scopes 1 and 2) NA NA NA NA
0.4. Currency selection Please select the currency in which you would like to submit your response. All financial information contained in the response should be in this currency. NA EUR(€) NA NA
1. Attachments NA NA NA NA
1. Further Information NA NA NA NA
8.7. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 2 emissions More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% NA More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% NA
11.1b. Explain the basis of the alternative figure (see guidance) NA NA
14.1b. What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? At present, the ICT sector is not regulated by any international agreement or emissions trading scheme. We have identificated a risk on possible mandatory emissions reduction targets for the ICT sector on a global or regional basis especially in Europe. W NA
8.1. Please select the boundary you are using for your Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas inventory NA NA NA NA
8.2a. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 92 NA 231902967 NA
8.3a. Please provide your gross global Scope 2 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 293 NA 8071070 NA
8.4. Are there are any sources (e.g. facilities, specific GHGs, activities, geographies, etc.) of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions which are not included in your disclosure? NA Yes NA NA
8.6. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 1 emissions More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% NA More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
8.7. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 2 emissions Third party verification or assurance underway but not yet complete - last years statement available Proportion of Scope 2 emissions that are verified/assured for 2011-2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.7a. Please indicate the proportion of your Scope 2 emissions that are verified/assured More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% More than 90% but less than or equal to 100%
8.7b Reporting Period From/To/Please provide further details of the verification/assurance undertaken, and attach the relevant statements/Type of verification or assurance/Relevant standard/Attach the document No Response
8.8. Are carbon dioxide emissions from biologically sequestered carbon relevant to your organization? Yes
8.8a. Please provide the emissions in metric tonnes CO2 1322
8.8a. Please provide the emissions in metric tonnes CO2e 0.05 1322 13638000
9.1. Do you have Scope 1 emissions sources in more than one country? Yes
9.1a Reporting Period From/To/Please complete the table below: Country/Region/Scope 1 metric tonnes CO2e 1 Jan 2012/31 Dec 2012/United Kingdom/6697
9.2. Please indicate which other Scope 1 emissions breakdowns you are able to provide (tick all that apply) NA By business division; By facility; By GHG type; By activity NA
9.2a Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by business division: Business division/Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) 1 Jan 2012/31 Dec 2012/Telefonica O2 United Kingdom/6697
9.2b Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by facility: Facility/Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) No Response
9.2c Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by GHG type: GHG type/Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) 1 Jan 2012/31 Dec 2012/CO2/110689
9.2d Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by activity: Activity/Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) 1 Jan 2012/31 Dec 2012/Stationary combustion/62484
9.2e Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by legal structure: Legal structure/Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) No Response
0.3. Country list configuration Estonia
0.4. Currency selection Please select the currency in which you would like to submit your response. All financial information contained in the response should be in this currency. EUR(€)
0.4. Please select the currency in which you would like to submit your response. EUR(€)
0.5. Please select if you wish to complete a shorter information request. NA
0.6. Modules NA As part of the Investor CDP information request, electric utilities, companies with electric utility activities or assets, companies in the automobile or auto component manufacture sectors and companies in the oil and gas industry should complete suppleme
1. Attachments NA NA NA
1. Further Information NA NA NA
1.1. Where is the highest level of direct responsibility for climate change within your company? No individual or committee with overall responsibility for climate change Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board
1.1a. Please identify the position of the individual or name of the committee with this responsibility NA The Committee in charged of carbon and energy in Telefónica is the Climate Change and Energy Efficiency Office (CC&EEO), which reports to the Executive Board, the Operations Committee, and the Reputation and Human Resources Committee. The strategy man NA
1.2. Do you provide incentives for the management of climate change issues, including the attainment of targets? No Yes Yes
1.2a. Who is entitled to benefit from these incentives? Energy managers/Recognition (non-monetary)/Achievement of energy reduction targets, renewable energy projects and energy efficiency projects planned and executed. Every Energy Manager has concrete targets to meet every year, the ones who meet them more ef
10.1. Do you have Scope 2 emissions sources in more than one country? Yes
10.1a Reporting Period: From/To/Please complete the table below: Country/Region/Scope 2 metric tonnes CO2e/Purchased and consumed electricity, heat, steam or cooling (MWh)/Purchased and consumed low carbon electricity, heat, steam or cooling (MWh) 1 Jan 2012/31 Dec 2012/United Kingdom/170523/372836/253293
10.2. Please indicate which other Scope 2 emissions breakdowns you are able to provide (tick all that apply) NA By business division; By facility; By activity NA
10.2a Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by business division: Business division/Scope 2 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) 1 Jan 2012/31 Dec 2012/Telefonica O2 United Kingdom/170523
10.2b Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by facility: Facility/Scope 2 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) 1 Jan 2012/31 Dec 2012/Cell sites/651745
10.2c Reporting Period: From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by activity: Activity/Scope 2 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) 1 Jan 2012/31 Dec 2012/Purchased electricity/1649137
10.2d Reporting Period: From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by legal structure: Legal structure/Scope 2 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) No Response
11. Attachments NA NA NA
11. Further Information NA NA NA
11.1. What percentage of your total operational spend in the reporting year was on energy? More than 0% but less than or equal to 5% More than 5% but less than or equal to 10% More than 95% but less than or equal to 100%
11.2. Please state how much fuel, electricity, heat, steam, and cooling in MWh your organization has purchased and consumed during the reporting year: Energy type/MWh Fuel/483295;Electricity/5914666;Heat/0;Steam/0;Cooling/0
11.3. Please complete the table by breaking down the total "Fuel" figure entered above by fuel type: Fuels/MWh Diesel/Gas oil/355504
11.4. Please provide details of the electricity, heat, steam or cooling amounts that were accounted at a low carbon emission factor: Basis for applying a low carbon emission factor/MWh associated with low carbon electricity, heat, steam or cooling Non-grid connected low carbon electricity generation owned by company, no instruments created/5537
12. Attachments NA
12. Further Information NA
12.1. How do your absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year compare to the previous year? Increased
12.1a Reason of change Emissions reduction activities, Divestment, Acquisitions, Mergers, Change in output, Change in methodology, Change in boundary, Change in physical operating conditions, Unidentified, Other
12.1a. Reason: Emissions value (percentage) Emissions reduction activities: 0.35/Change in output: 2.5/Change in boundary: 0.1/
12.2. Please describe your gross combined Scope 1 and 2 emissions for the reporting year in metric tonnes CO2e per revenue: Intensity figure/Metric numerator/% change from previous year/Direction of change from previous year/Reason for change 28.23/metric tonnes CO2e/2.39/Increase/Telefonica GHG Emissions increased by 1,6% in 2012. On the other hand the revenue decreased by 0.77% in the last year.
12.3. Please describe your gross combined Scope 1 and 2 emissions for the reporting year in metric tonnes CO2e per FTE: Intensity figure/Metric numerator/% change from previous year/Direction of change from previous year/Reason for change 15.58/metric tonnes CO2e/6.05/Increase/This increase has happened due to 2 factors. The first one related to the decrease of employees full time in the company due to restructuring processes. The second, related to a general increase in the power consumpt
12.4. Please provide an additional intensity (normalized) metric that is appropriate to your business operations: Intensity figure/Metric numerator/% change from previous year/Direction of change from previous year/Reason for change 0.0088/metric tonnes CO2e/0.83/Decrease/CO2 emissions per equivalent access decreased due to emissions reduction activities carried out during 2012. Main activities are the implementation of energy efficiency projects in networks.
13.1. Do you participate in any emissions trading schemes? Yes
13.1b. What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? At present Telefónica is participating in two particular initiatives on emissions tranding schemes & programs. 1. Clean Development Mechanism (CDM). We are working in the process of obtaining CDM credits from two types of projects a)energy efficiency
13.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? Yes
14. Attachments NA NA NA
14. Further Information NA NA NA
14.1. Do you participate in any emission trading schemes? No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next two years Yes Yes
14.1b. What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? At present Telefónica is participating in two particular initiatives on emissions tranding schemes & programs. 1. Clean Development Mechanism (CDM). We are working in the process of obtaining CDM credits from two types of projects a)energy efficiency
14.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? No Yes Yes
14.2. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 3 emissions Third party verification or assurance underway but not yet complete - last years statement available
14.2a. Please indicate the proportion of your Scope 3 emissions that are verified/assured More than 0% but less than or equal to 20%
14.3. Are you able to compare your Scope 3 emissions for the reporting year with those for the previous year for any sources? Yes
14.4. Do you engage with any of the elements of your value chain on GHG emissions and climate change strategies? (Tick all that apply) Yes, our suppliers; Yes, our customers; Yes, other partners in the value chain
14.4a. Please give details of methods of engagement, your strategy for prioritizing engagements and measures of success To our suppliers: Telefónica holds once a year the Global Workshop on Energy and Climate Change. Suppliers of network participate in this workshop, where we share best practices in energy efficiency and we transfer the climate change strategy to all the g
14.4d. Please explain why not and any plans you have to develop an engagement strategy in the future NA
2. Attachments NA NA NA
2. Further Information NA NA NA
2.1. Please select the option that best describes your risk management procedures with regard to climate change risks and opportunities NA Integrated into multi-disciplinary company wide risk management processes NA
2.1a. Please provide further details i) Scope of process Telefónica has a global integrated risk management process since the year 2007 to define the risks and opportunities with the most serious impact on the Company’s strategic and operational targets. ii) How risks/opportunities are asse
2.1a. Please provide further details (see guidance) NA i) Scope of process Telefónica has a global integrated risk management process since the year 2007 to define the risks and opportunities with the most serious impact on the Company’s strategic and operational targets. ii) How risks/opportunities are asse NA
2.2. Is climate change integrated into your business strategy? No Yes Yes
2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes Telefónica has an integrated approach on energy, carbon and climate change, with three converging objectives with short and long term view, which have influenced our estrategy definition. 1) to foster internal energy efficiency and GHG emissions reduction
2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes (see guidance) NA Telefónica has an integrated approach on energy, carbon and climate change, with three converging objectives with short and long term view, which have influenced our estrategy definition. 1) to foster internal energy efficiency and GHG emissions reduction NA
2.2b. Please explain why not NA NA NA
2.3. Do you engage in activities that could either directly or indirectly influence policy on climate change through any of the following? (tick all that apply) Yes
2.3. Do you engage with policy makers to encourage further action on mitigation and/or adaptation? No No Yes
2.3a. On what issues have you been engaging directly?: Focus of legislation/Corporate Position/Details of engagement/Proposed solution Mandatory carbon reporting/Support/ITU-T: Telefonica participates in the methodologies development work with ITU-T SG5. In addition in 2012 we participate in the pilot testing of the EU Commision for methodologies to assess the impact of ICTs./Participate
2.3a. Please explain (i) the engagement process and (ii) actions you are advocating NA ITU-T: Telefonica participates in the methodologies development work with ITU-T SG5. In addition in 2012 we participate in the pilot testing of the EU Commision for methodologies to assess the impact of ICTs., ETNO. European Telecom networks operators tow NA
2.3b. Are you on the Board of any trade associations or provide funding beyond membership? No
2.3c. Please enter the details of those trade associations that are likely to take a position on climate change legislation/Trade association NA
2.3d. Do you publically disclose a list of all the research organizations that you fund? NA
2.3e. Do you fund any research organizations to produce public work on climate change? NA
2.3f. Please describe the work and how it aligns with your own strategy on climate change NA
2.3g. Please provide details of the other engagement activities that you undertake NA
2.3h. What processes do you have in place to ensure that all of your direct and indirect activities that influence policy are consistent with your overall climate change strategy? We have a strategic view called Policy Advocacy, and we recognize we have to work together with the sector to leverage the role of ICTs for climate change mitigation & adaptation. We participate in working groups and we contribute actively. We work t
2.3i. Please explain why you do not engage with policy makers NA
3. Attachments NA NA NA
3. Further Information NA NA NA
3.1. Did you have an emissions reduction target that was active (ongoing or reached completion) in the reporting year? No Intensity target Absolute and intensity targets
3.1a. Absolute target/ID/Scope/% of emissions in scope/% reduction from base year/Base year/Base year emissions (metric tonnes CO2e)/Target year/Comment No Response
3.1b. Intensity target/ID/Scope/% of emissions in scope/% reduction from base year/Metric/Base year/Normalized base year emissions/Target year/Comment T1/Scope 1+2/100/30/Other: Metric tonnes CO2eq per Equivalent Access/2010/1697609/2020/This target was publicly announced in 2012. Telefonica emissions global target is to reduce 30% the CO2eq direct and indirect emissions (Scope I + II) per equivalent cl
3.1c. What change in absolute emissions this intensity target reflects/ID/Direction of change anticipated in absolute Scope 1+2 emissions at target completion?/% change anticipated in absolute Scope 1+2 emissions T1/Decrease/1.23///We have predicted the number of equivalent access to 2020. To achieve our emissions reduction target Telefonica will have to emit 6.62 kg of CO2eq per client at the end of 2020. If Telefonica achieves the target, the absolute emissions
3.1d. Please provide details on your progress against this target made in the reporting year/ID/% complete (time)/% complete (emissions)/Comment /20/24.7/In 2010 Telefonica emitted 9.45 kg CO2 eq per equivalent access. At the end of 2012 Telefonica emitted 8.88 kg CO2eq per equivalent access so the 24.7% of the emissions reduction target is already completed.
3.1e. Please explain (i) why not; and (ii) forecast how your emissions will change over the next five years NA NA NA
3.2. Does the use of your goods and/or services directly enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party? No Yes Yes
3.2a. Please provide details (see guidance) NA Telefónica has a global strategy of Green ICT services focused in the development of integrated solutions that could be used globally for developed and developing countries and must give answers for eco-efficiency and climate change mitigation and adaptat NA
3.3. Did you have emissions reduction initiatives that were active within the reporting year (this can include those in the planning and/or implementation phases) No Yes Yes
3.3a. Please identify the total number of projects at each stage of development, and for those in theimplementation stages, the estimated CO2e savings/Stage of development/3.3a. Number of projects/Total estimated annual CO2e savings in metric tonnes CO2e Under investigation/6/
3.3c Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities. 0 4 13 Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities.
3.3c. What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities? NA Dedicated budget for energy efficiency, Financial optimization calculations, Compliance with regulatory requirements/standards, Employee engagement NA
3.3c. What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities?/Comment Dedicated budget for energy efficiency/To reduce the carbon footprint, reduce operational costs and provide services at attractive prices, Telefónica assess, define and implement projects with CAPEX dedicated for energy efficiency (since financial indica
4. Attachments NA
4. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? - Further Information For the 2012 reporting year, Telefónica has commited even more on energy & climate change communications. We have decided to include in our sustainbility report a whole EnvironmentalDimension chapter called Green ICTs and Environment in order to commu
4.1. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? 7 The number of corporate annual reports and voluntary publications (complete and/or underway) made about the company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance
5. Attachments NA NA NA
5. Further Information NA NA NA
5.1. Have you identified any climate change risks (current or future) that have potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Risks driven by changes in regulation; Risks driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA
5.1a. Climate change risks driven by changes in regulation Yes
5.1a. Please describe your risks driven by changes in regulation /ID/Risk driver/ Description/Potential impact/Timeframe/Direct/Indirect/Likelihood/Magnitude of impact RR1/International agreements/The CT sector is not regulated by any international agreement for emissions accounting or reduction. We foresee a possible risk for this in Europe due to the existance of the the EU "Recommendation C(2009) 7604" (October 9th 2
5.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk and (iii) the costs associated with these actions RR1. Fin.Imp: Anticipated investment in emissions reduction activities & energy efficient technologies planned for 2014-15 (around €20-30 million). Human resources would be needed if targets are set forcing us to increase our structure on a global &am
5.1c. Climate change risks driven by change in physical climate parameters Yes
5.1c. Please describe your risks that are driven by change in physical climate parameters/ID/Risk driver/Description/Potential impact/Timeframe/Direct/Indirect/Likelihood/Magnitude of impact PR1/Change in mean (average) precipitation/Change in precipitation patterns and extremes rain can cause unexpected floods or impacts, which can affect and damage our facilities and infrastructure, especially our telecommunication networks and submarine ca
5.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA All the physical climate change riks are conceived within the operational riks of Telefonica. Each country has the mandate to assess the risk, do the economic valoration of it and establish the risk management plan. PR1: Fin.Imp: These risks could affect NA
5.1e. Please describe your risks that are driven by changes in other climate-related developments/ID/Risk driver/Description/Potential impact/Timeframe/Direct/Indirect/Likelihood/Magnitude of impact /Induced changes in natural resources//Increased operational cost/Unknown/Indirect (Supply chain)/Unlikely/Medium
5.1e.Climate change risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments Yes
5.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA OR1. Fin.Imp: The estimation of the reputational impact of any climate change risk should be based on a qualitative methodology and on the methodology used by Telefónica which is based on indexes (i.e; DJSI), researches and RepTrack Model, which is a mode NA
5.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
5.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
5.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
6. Attachments NA NA NA
6. Further Information NA NA NA
6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Opportunities driven by changes in regulation; Opportunities driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA
6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? -Transparency Yes
6.1a Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in regulation? NA Yes NA
6.1a. Please describe your opportunities that are driven by changes in regulation/ID/Opportunity driver/Description/Potential impact/Timeframe/Direct/Indirect/Likelihood/Magnitude of impact RO1/International agreements/Carbon & energy regulatory frameworks for energy & carbon targets will give us the opportunity to be more efficient and reduce our operational costs, while reducing energy consumption./Reduced operational costs/1-5 yea
6.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity and (iii) the costs associated with these actions RO1, RO2 & RO3. Fin.Imp: The financial implications will be associated to reduced CAPEX & OPEX costs as we will be ready to meet any regulation without any non-planned investment in energy or CO2 reduction practices. At present, Telefónica pays ar
6.1c. Please describe the opportunities that are driven by changes in physical climate parameters Yes
6.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity and (iii) the costs associated with these actions PO1 & PO2: Fin. Imp: There are two opportunities. The first one related to costs reductions of disasters with the implementation of preventive measures and the second related to the market opportunities for ICT products and services for adaptation to
6.1e. Please describe the opportunities that are driven by changes in other climate-related developments Yes
6.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA OO1: Fin.Imp: It is difficult to cuantify the benefits that increased reputation in Green ICT can have in Telefónica. Anyway, we have percieved an increase of demand of services from Telefónica in the areas of energy efficiency especially in cities due NA
6.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
6.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
6.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
7. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/sites/2013/27/18427/Investor CDP 2013/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2013/7.EmissionsMethodology/7.4 Emissions Factors_Telefonica.xls NA
7. Further Information NA Q. 7.4: Telefonica collects the emissions factors from two main calculation tools: * Emission-Factors-from-Cross-Sector-Tools-(August-2012) from GHG Protocol http://www.ghgprotocol.org/files/ghgp/tools/Emission-Factors-from-Cross-Sector-Tools-(August-2012 NA
7.1. Please provide your base year and base year emissions (Scopes 1 and 2)/7.1. Base year From Date:/To Date:/ Scope 1 Base year emissions (metric tonnes CO2e)/N39Scope 2 Base year emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) 2010-01-01/2010-12-31/127951/1569658
7.2. Please give the name of the standard, protocol or methodology you have used to collect activity data and calculate Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions NA ISO 14064-1/The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (Revised Edition)/Other NA
7.3. Please give the source for the global warming potentials you have used Gas/Reference CO2/IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (AR4 - 100 year)
7.4. Please give the emissions factors you have applied and their origin; alternatively, please attach an Excel spreadsheet with this data Fuel/Material/Energy/Emission Factor/Unit/Reference ///
8.1. Please select the boundary you are using for your Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas inventory NA Operational control NA Boundary used for Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas inventory during 2011-2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.2. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e NA Gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e for 2011 - 2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.2. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figures in metric tonnes CO2e 111124
8.3. Please provide your gross global Scope 2 emissions figures in metric tonnes CO2e NA
8.4. Are there are any sources (e.g. facilities, specific GHGs, activities, geographies, etc.) of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions which are not included in your disclosure? NA Yes NA Proportion of Scope 1 emissions that are verified/assured for 2011 - 2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.4a Reporting Period From/To/Source/Scope/Explain why the source is excluded 1 Jan 2012/31 Dec 2012/HFCs and PFCs emissions from air conditioning and refrigeration equipment/Scope 1/The primary data about fugitive emissions in air conditioning equipments has high uncertainty and calculations are based in several assumptions. Telef
8.5 Reporting Period From/To/Please estimate the uncertainty of the total gross global Scope 1 and 2 emissions figures that you have supplied and specify the sources of uncertainty in your data gathering, handling and calculations/Scope 1 emissions No Response
8.6. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 1 emissions Third party verification or assurance underway but not yet complete - last years statement available Proportion of Scope 1 emissions that are verified/assured for 2011 - 2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.6a. Please indicate the proportion of your Scope 1 emissions that are verified/assured More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% More than 90% but less than or equal to 100%
8.6b Reporting Period From/To/Please provide further details of the verification/assurance undertaken, and attach the relevant statements: Type of verification or assurance/Attach the document No Response
2013 Performance Band E B A NA
2013 Score 0 95 100 NA
0. Attachments NA NA NA If you have not been presented with a sector module that you consider would be appropriate for your company to answer, please select the module below. If you wish to view the questions first, please see https://www.cdproject.net/en-US/Programmes/Pages/Mor
0. Further Information NA NA NA If you are in these sectors (according to the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS)), the corresponding sector modules will be marked as default options to your information request. If you want to query your classification, please email respond@c
0.1. Introduction - Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. NA Telefónica is one of the world leaders integrated operator in the telecommunication sector, providing communication, information and entertainment solutions, with presence in Europe and Latin America. It operates in 24 countries. As of March 2013, Telefón NA
0.1. Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. Telefónica is one of the world leaders integrated operator in the telecommunication sector, providing communication, information and entertainment solutions, with presence in Europe and Latin America. It operates in 24 countries. As of March 2013, Telefón
0.2. Please state the start and end date of the year for which you are reporting data. 2012-01-01
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Reported Scope 3 Total (tCO2e) 670000000 52207 0 Indicated the total reported Scope 3 (all other indirect emissions) of the company in metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent (tCO2e) as defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol. Where no Scope 3 emissions are reported, this is recorded as "No Data"
Scope 1+2 Intensity 11162.43 20.86 0.3 Intensity is calculated by adding together a company's Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions and dividing by its turnover.
Global 800 Carbon Rank 800 5 1 Carbon Ranking of 800 international companies. Ranking is determined by EIO Methodology. See Source Info sheet for comments on it
No. of Scope 3 Categories Reported 1 1 15 This column indicates the number of Scope 3 Categories reported. Once placed into one of the four Disclosure Categories, companies are ranked by the number of Scope 3 categories disclosed.
Reported Scope 1+2 Total (tCO2e) 282000000 1728109 843 The total reported Scope 1 (all direct emissions) and Scope 2 (indirect electricity emissions) of the company in metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent (tCO2e) as defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol
Accepted or Inferred Scope 3 Intensity 8547.13 71.44 64.51 Unless the company reports all 15 Scope 3 categories as defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Standard, an inferred figure based on the highest reported intensity for that sector, across the Global ET Universe, is shown
Category No Public Data Green Public, Complete, and Verified data Companies are placed into one of four data or 'disclosure' categories: 1) Public, Complete, and Verified data; 2) Public, Complete, and Unverified data; 3) Public, Incomplete, Verified or Unverified data; 4) No Public Data
Combined Scope 1+2+3 Intensity 12161.68 56.58 34.24 Combined Scope 1+2_3 Intensity is calculated by adding together a company's Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions at 100% (disclosed or inferred) + 50% of Scope 3 emissions (disclosed or inferred).
Market Value ($Million) 1667.87 61143 358143.1 A company's market value, or market capitalism (number of shares times x share price). This value was taken on 23.08.2011
Ekobai B2B Directory
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Description NA Description of the company's product.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Size NA Large NA NA
Region NA Europe NA NA
Report Html Address NA NA NA NA
Report Pdf Address NA http://www.rcysostenibilidad.telefonica.com/rcysost2011/Telefonica_RC11_En_ampliada.pdf NA NA
Report reference IFC Performance Standards? NA No NA NA
Report reference ISO Standards? NA No NA NA
Report Title NA 2011 Sustainability Report NA NA
Sector NA Telecommunications NA NA
Sector Supplements (Final) NA Not Applicable NA NA
Application Level Undeclared A+ A+ G3 Application Levels indicate to which extent the GRI Guidelines have been utilized in the reporting and which set and number of disclosures have been addressed in the reporting. There are three Application Levels A, B and C.
Country (HQ) NA Spain NA NA
Date Added To Sr List NA January 22, 2013 NA NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Guidelines NA GRI - G3.1 NA This field indicates which version of the GRI Guidelines is used for the reporting. As of publication year 2009, GRI only includes reporting that makes use of the G3 Guidelines, which were released in October 2006.
Integrated No No Yes GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
Publication Year 2013 GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
Region NA Europe NA Region the organization operates in.
Report Html Address NA http://annualreport2012.telefonica.com/informe-sostenibilidad/index.html NA URL of the report location.
Report Pdf Address NA http://annualreport2012.telefonica.com/pdf/SOSTENIBILIDAD_2012_ENG.pdf NA Location of a PDF version of the report.
Report Title NA 2012 Corporate Sustainability Report NA Title of the report.
Sector NA Telecommunications NA Industry sector.
Sector Supplements (Final) NA Not Applicable NA This field indicates if the reporting organization has made use of one of the final Sector Supplements and which one. If ‘not used’ is indicated, it means that one of the final Sector Supplements is applicable, but has not been used. If ‘not applicable’ i
Size NA Large NA GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Envtl. Mgmt. 28.6 80 91.9 Based on an analysis of companies tracked in Sustainalytics’ Global Platform, the Environmental Management Score is an assessment of how a company manages its environmental performance through policies, programs, targets, certifications, and the like. To
Green Score 0 79.8 100 NA
Rank 500 15 1 NA
Disclosure 0 99.7 100 Environmental disclosure was included as a stand-alone score to assess each company’s transparency with regard to its environmental performance. Specifically, this score evaluates the breadth and quality of company environmen
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Carbon Productivity 0.015 0.684 0.963 GHG Productivity defined as Revenue ($US) / Total Greenhouse gas (GHG) Emissions (CO2e).
Energy Productivity 0.007 0.506 0.957 Energy Productivity defined as Revenue ($US) / Total Energy Consumption (GJ).
Newsweek Green Score 0.0 0.579 0.843 This score is derived from the following component scores: an Energy Productivity,Carbon Productivity, Water Productivity, Waste Productivity, Reputation, Pay Link, Sustainability Themed Committee, Audit ; weighted at 45 percent, 45 percent, and 10 percen
Pay Link No No Yes A mechanism to link the remuneration of any member of a company's senior executive team with the achievement of environmental performance targets.
Rank 500 73 1
Reputation 0.005 0.722 1 The Reputation score is made up of two components: (1) The RepRisk Index, which is a quantitative measure that captures criticism and quantifies a company exposure to ESG risks. (2) The second component is based on the number of environmental issues that
Sustainability Themed Committee No Yes Yes The existence of a committee at the Board of Directors level whose mandate is related to the sustainability of the company, including but not limited to environmental matters.
Waste Productivity 0.014 0.737 0.97 Waste Productivity is defined as Revenue ($US) / [Total waste generated (metric tonnes) – waste recycled/reused (metric tonnes)].
Water Productivity 0.012 0.303 0.992 Water Productivity is defined as Revenue ($US) / Total water use (m3).
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Corporate Governance 3 0.8 0 The scores for each ESG scope issue ranges from 0-3. The scoring refers to the number of times the company was criticized in relation to that scope issue: 0 = little or no exposure in the past 4 years; 1 = 5 direct relations in the past 4 years; 2 = 10 direct relations in the past 4 years; 3 = 20 direct relations in the past 4 years.
Current RRI 86 24 0 The RepRisk Index (RRI) is a quantitative risk measure that captures criticism and quantifies a company's exposure to controversial environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues. It does not measure a company's overall reputation, but rather is an indicator of their reputational risk.The Current RRI value indicates the current level of criticism about a company.
Employee Relations 3 0.6 0 The scores for each ESG scope issue ranges from 0-3. The scoring refers to the number of times the company was criticized in relation to that scope issue: 0 = little or no exposure in the past 4 years; 1 = 5 direct relations in the past 4 years; 2 = 10 direct relations in the past 4 years; 3 = 20 direct relations in the past 4 years.
Environmental FootPrint 3 1.2 0 The scores for each ESG scope issue ranges from 0-3. The scoring refers to the number of times the company was criticized in relation to that scope issue: 0 = little or no exposure in the past 4 years; 1 = 5 direct relations in the past 4 years; 2 = 10 direct relations in the past 4 years; 3 = 20 direct relations in the past 4 years.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Rank 400 N/R 1 REPORTWATCH RATING
Report Rating D B- A REPORTWATCH RATING
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
include_continued_support_statement 0 1 1 NA
additional_questions 0 1 1 NA
cop_web_link NA http://www.unglobalcompact.org/COPs/detail/18516 NA NA
created_at NA 39722.6139 NA NA
differentiation NA blueprint NA NA
ends_on NA 39721 NA NA
include_measurement 0 1 1 NA
meets_advanced_criteria 0 1 1 NA
method_shared NA all NA NA
references_anti_corruption 0 1 1 NA
references_environment 0 1 1 NA
references_human_rights 0 1 1 NA
references_labour 0 1 1 NA
starts_on NA 39355 NA NA
title NA Communication on Progress NA NA
updated_at NA 39722.6139 NA NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
include_measurement 0 1 1 Does your COP identify targets, define performance indicators and measure outcomes?
references_anti_corruption 0 1 1 Does your COP contain description of actions, and when relevant policies, related to anti-corruption?
references_environment 0 1 1 Does your COP contain description of actions, and when relevant policies, related to the environment?
references_human_rights 0 1 1 Does your COP contain description of actions, and when relevant policies, related to human rights?
references_labour 0 1 1 Does your COP contain description of actions, and when relevant policies, related to labour rights?
starts_on NA 09/01/2012 NA Start Date
differentiation NA advanced NA At what level is the declarer?
ends_on NA 09/01/2013 NA End Date
format NA sustainability_report NA How is your COP shared with stakeholders?
WEConnect International
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Flags

(Other Indicators - things that don’t affect ratings but that help identify or classify companies)

SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
You have put report(s) in your cart
Go to my cart
Ok