CSRHub is the world’s largest CSR (corporate social responsibility) and sustainability ratings and information database.

Specializing in the manufacturing of industrial machinery and equipment, surfacing technology, and rotating equipment maintenance, the four divisions of Sulzer are global leaders in their respective markets.

Ticker: SUN-EB ISIN: CH0038388911
Address: Zuercherstrasse 12 , Switzerland , Winterthur , , 8401 Website: Sulzer
Phone #: 41-52-262-1122 CSR Web Area: SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Basic Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Ratings

  Overall Community Employees Environment Governance
Sulzer 65 64 68 67 62
Machinery Manufacturing
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
All company average 55 55 56 58 52
Switzerland
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Percentile Rankings

Rankings are in percentile terms, compared to other companies in the same industry and country Overall Community Employees Environment Governance
Sulzer 94% 84% 86% 80% 80%
Machinery Manufacturing
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Switzerland
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Special Issues:

Ratings History

Only subscribers can interact with the graph.

More CSR Rating Details

  Community Employees
Community Dev & Philanthropy Product Human Rights & Supply Chain Compensation & Benefits Diversity & Labor Rights Training, Health & Safety
Sulzer
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Machinery Manufacturing
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
All company average 53 54 55 58 55 55
Switzerland
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Environment Governance
Energy & Climate Change Environmant Policy & Reporting Resource Management Board Leadership Ethics Transparency & Reporting
Sulzer
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Machinery Manufacturing
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
All company average 57 58 57 50 55 51
Switzerland
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Percentile rankings

Rankings are in percentile terms, compared to other companies in the same industry and country Community Employees
Community Dev & Philantrophy Product Human Rights & Supply Chain Compensation & Benefits Diversity & Labor Rights Training, Health & Safety
Sulzer 86% 93% 66% 50% 93% 95%
Machinery Manufacturing
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Switzerland
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Environment Governance
Energy & Climate Change Environment Policy & Reporting Resource Management Board Leadership Ethics Transparency & Reporting
Sulzer 79% 82% 82% 80% 82% 72%
Machinery Manufacturing
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Switzerland
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

0 Special Issues Affect This Company (see a list of issues here)

# of Sources
Machinery Manufacturing
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Overall database
Switzerland
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

CSRHub Has 27 Data Sources (17 Are Currently Active) for This Company

= sources impacting the current ratings
= sources not impacting the current ratings, but included in earlier ratings for this company
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Original Data Values

(unsubscribed users can see the list, subscribers can see the data details for most sources)

Data source name

Data source element name Minimum value Value provided by datasource Maximum value Data description
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
0. Further Information NA NA NA NA
0.1. Introduction - Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. NA Sulzer was founded in 1834 in Winterthur, Switzerland, and is a global partner with reliable and sustainable solutions for performance-critical applications. We specialize in industrial machinery and equipment, surface technology, and rotating equipment m NA NA
5.1e Identified climate change risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments? NA Yes NA NA
5.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA Regarding reputational risks, Sulzer aspires to become sector eco-efficiency leader with its high quality, eco-efficient and reliable solutions. Failing to meet minimum quality and ecological legal requirements and above minimum ecological stakeholder exp NA NA
5.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
5.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
5.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
6. Attachments NA NA NA NA
6. Further Information NA NA NA NA
6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Opportunities driven by changes in regulation; Opportunities driven by changes in physical climate parameters NA NA
6.1a Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in regulation? NA Yes NA NA
6.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA Meeting the world's growing demand for energy and resources is a pressing challenge. As developing nations industrialize, urbanize, and achieve higher standards of living, and mature markets and their infrastructures age, the demand for energy and resourc NA NA
6.1c Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in physical climate parameters? NA Yes NA NA
14. Attachments NA NA NA NA
6.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA Water scarcity jeopardizes people’s quality of life, whereas access to water is becoming an increasing problem around the globe. CAGR of waste wate market (a potential source for fresh water) is estimated 5.7% for 2010–2016 for emerging economies and matu NA NA
6.1e Identified opportunities that are driven by changes in other climate-related developments? NA No NA NA
6.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA NA NA NA
13. Attachments NA NA NA NA
11. Attachments NA NA NA NA
11. Further Information NA NA NA NA
11.1. Do you consider that the grid average factors used to report Scope 2 emissions in Question 8.3 reflect the contractual arrangements you have with electricity suppliers? NA Yes NA NA
11.1a. You may report a total contractual Scope 2 figure in response to this question. Please provide your total global contractual Scope 2 GHG emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 0 NA 17902000 NA
11.2. Has your organization retired any certificates, e.g. Renewable Energy Certificates, associated with zero or low carbon electricity within the reporting year or has this been done on your behalf? NA No NA NA
3.1e. Please explain (i) why not; and (ii) forecast how your emissions will change over the next five years NA NA NA NA
3.2. Does the use of your goods and/or services directly enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party? No Yes Yes NA
3.2a. Please provide details (see guidance) NA About two-thirds of all Sulzer products are energy intensive in use. The company’s resource- and energy-efficient solutions reduce overall costs and CO2 emissions by making the operational stage more efficient. Therefore, innovation and technology develop NA NA
3.3c Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities. 0 1 12 NA
3.3c. What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities? NA NA NA NA
5. Attachments NA NA NA NA
5. Further Information NA NA NA NA
5.1. Have you identified any climate change risks (current or future) that have potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Risks driven by changes in regulation; Risks driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA NA
5.1a Identified risks driven by changes in regulation? NA NA NA NA
5.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA Sulzer has five strategic focus areas: Corporation-wide operational excellence based on LEAN / Health and safety / Increased and faster high-quality innovation / Transition into emerging markets / Increased focus on service which are included in to all de NA NA
14. Further Information NA NA NA NA
1.1. Where is the highest level of direct responsibility for climate change within your company? No individual or committee with overall responsibility for climate change Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board NA
1.1a. Please identify the position of the individual or name of the committee with this responsibility NA Klaus Stahlmann, Chief Executive Officer NA NA
1.2. Do you provide incentives for the management of climate change issues, including the attainment of targets? No No Yes NA
13. Further Information NA See http://www.sulzer.com/en/desktopdefault.aspx/tabid-4645/9277_read-21653/ for SEED database coverage. See: http://www.sulzer.com/en/desktopdefault.aspx/tabid-4645/ for additional infos regarding boundaries a.s.o. NA NA
13.1. How do your absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year compare to the previous year? Increased Increased Decreased NA
13.1a (i) If absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) have increased, decreased or remained the same overall compared to the previous year, state direction of change NA Moderately Increased NA NA
13.1a (ii) If absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) have increased, decreased or remained the same overall compared to the previous year, state the reason for the direction of change NA Increase: Change in output, Decrease: Change in boundary NA NA
13.1a (iii) If emissions have increased, decreased or remained the same overall, provide the emissions value (%) NA Decrease: , Increase: 4.2 , Emission value for which direction is not stated: NA NA
2012 Score 0 63 100 NA
2012 Performance Band E D A NA
2.3a. Please explain (i) the engagement process and (ii) actions you are advocating NA Sulzer plays a role in society, which the company plays as effectively as possible. Sulzer does not engage in direct lobbyism. Sulzer is indirectly represented by strategically chosen business initiatives in which it actively participates to develop colla NA NA
8.8. Are carbon dioxide emissions from the combustion of biologically sequestered carbon (i.e. carbon dioxide emissions from burning biomass/biofuels) relevant to your company? No No Yes NA
8.8a. Please provide the emissions in metric tonnes CO2e 0.01 NA 27263000 NA
Management 4. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/81/17881/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/4.Communication/Sulzer_Sustainability-Insights_2011.pdf NA NA
Management 4. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? NA 9 NA NA
5.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA Regarding rising sea level/flooding and hurricanes and infectious diseases: Sulzer operates several sites in the Caribbean hurricane belt; hurricanes are expected to become more severe and occurring at higher frequency. Expected damages are impacts on phy NA NA
2. Attachments NA NA NA NA
2. Further Information NA NA NA NA
5.1c Identified climate change risks driven by change in physical climate parameters? NA Yes NA NA
2.1. Please select the option that best describes your risk management procedures with regard to climate change risks and opportunities NA Integrated into multi-disciplinary company wide risk management processes NA NA
2.1a. Please provide further details (see guidance) NA Sulzer's integrated risk management system applies to all Sulzer sites and helps to ensure the sustainable success of existing activities and the overall development of the company. The overall objectives of the risk management system are threefold: Su NA NA
2.2. Is climate change integrated into your business strategy? No Yes Yes NA
2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes (see guidance) NA Meeting the world's growing demand for energy is a pressing challenge. As developing nations industrialize, urbanize, and achieve higher standards of living, the demand for energy and resources grows and tensions on our ecosystems increase. This and polit NA NA
2.2b. Please explain why not NA NA NA NA
2.3. Do you engage with policy makers to encourage further action on mitigation and/or adaptation? No Yes Yes NA
3. Attachments NA NA NA NA
3. Further Information NA NA NA NA
3.1. Did you have an emissions reduction target that was active (ongoing or reached completion) in the reporting year? No Intensity target Absolute and intensity targets NA
14.1. Do you participate in any emission trading schemes? No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next two years No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next two years Yes NA
14.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? No No Yes NA
6.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
6.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
6.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA Although opportunities were identified (as summed up in Guidance document), incl. trivial ones such as increased reputation as a eco-efficient solutions provider or fluctuating socio-economic changes (in emerging countries, which are of strategic importan NA NA
7. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/81/17881/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/7.EmissionsMethodology/Sulzer GHG Protocol Report 2011.pdf NA NA
7. Further Information NA NA NA NA
7.1. Please provide your base year and base year emissions (Scopes 1 and 2) NA NA NA NA
0.4. Currency selection Please select the currency in which you would like to submit your response. All financial information contained in the response should be in this currency. NA CHF NA NA
1. Attachments NA NA NA NA
1. Further Information NA NA NA NA
8.7. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 2 emissions More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% NA More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% NA
11.1b. Explain the basis of the alternative figure (see guidance) NA NA
14.1b. What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? NA NA
8.1. Please select the boundary you are using for your Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas inventory NA NA NA NA
8.2a. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 92 NA 231902967 NA
8.3a. Please provide your gross global Scope 2 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 293 NA 8071070 NA
8.4. Are there are any sources (e.g. facilities, specific GHGs, activities, geographies, etc.) of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions which are not included in your disclosure? NA Yes NA NA
8.6. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 1 emissions More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
8.7. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 2 emissions Third party verification or assurance complete Proportion of Scope 2 emissions that are verified/assured for 2011-2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.7a. Please indicate the proportion of your Scope 2 emissions that are verified/assured More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% More than 90% but less than or equal to 100%
8.7b Reporting Period From/To/Please provide further details of the verification/assurance undertaken, and attach the relevant statements/Type of verification or assurance/Relevant standard/Attach the document No Response
8.8. Are carbon dioxide emissions from biologically sequestered carbon relevant to your organization? No
8.8a. Please provide the emissions in metric tonnes CO2 NA
8.8a. Please provide the emissions in metric tonnes CO2e 0.05 NA 13638000
9.1. Do you have Scope 1 emissions sources in more than one country? Yes
9.1a Reporting Period From/To/Please complete the table below: Country/Region/Scope 1 metric tonnes CO2e 1 Oct 2011/30 Sep 2012/Argentina/2
9.2. Please indicate which other Scope 1 emissions breakdowns you are able to provide (tick all that apply) NA By GHG type NA
9.2a Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by business division: Business division/Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) No Response
9.2b Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by facility: Facility/Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) No Response
9.2c Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by GHG type: GHG type/Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) No Response
9.2d Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by activity: Activity/Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) No Response
9.2e Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by legal structure: Legal structure/Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) No Response
0.3. Country list configuration Canada
0.4. Currency selection Please select the currency in which you would like to submit your response. All financial information contained in the response should be in this currency. CHF
0.4. Please select the currency in which you would like to submit your response. CHF
0.5. Please select if you wish to complete a shorter information request. NA
0.6. Modules NA As part of the Investor CDP information request, electric utilities, companies with electric utility activities or assets, companies in the automobile or auto component manufacture sectors and companies in the oil and gas industry should complete suppleme
1. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/sites/2013/81/17881/Investor CDP 2013/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2013/1.Governance/Sulzer Sustainability Report 2012.pdf NA
1. Further Information NA Please visit www.sulzer.com/en/about-us/governance for additional information on Sulzer's Corporate Governance NA
1.1. Where is the highest level of direct responsibility for climate change within your company? No individual or committee with overall responsibility for climate change Senior Manager/Officer Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board
1.1a. Please identify the position of the individual or name of the committee with this responsibility NA The highest level of direct responsibility for Climate Change within Sulzer has Ms. Ruth Blumer Lahner, Corporate Head of Quality, Environment, Health, Safety and Sustainable Development (QESH & SD). Ms Blumer Lahner is part of Sulzer's Management Gro NA
1.2. Do you provide incentives for the management of climate change issues, including the attainment of targets? No No Yes
1.2a. Who is entitled to benefit from these incentives? No Response
10.1. Do you have Scope 2 emissions sources in more than one country? Yes
10.1a Reporting Period: From/To/Please complete the table below: Country/Region/Scope 2 metric tonnes CO2e/Purchased and consumed electricity, heat, steam or cooling (MWh)/Purchased and consumed low carbon electricity, heat, steam or cooling (MWh) 1 Oct 2011/30 Sep 2012/Argentina/124/124/
10.2. Please indicate which other Scope 2 emissions breakdowns you are able to provide (tick all that apply) NA NA NA
10.2a Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by business division: Business division/Scope 2 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) No Response
10.2b Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by facility: Facility/Scope 2 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) No Response
10.2c Reporting Period: From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by activity: Activity/Scope 2 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) No Response
10.2d Reporting Period: From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by legal structure: Legal structure/Scope 2 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) No Response
11. Attachments NA NA NA
11. Further Information NA Comment 11.2. Steam and cooling no longer separately reported; integrated in total instead NA
11.1. What percentage of your total operational spend in the reporting year was on energy? More than 0% but less than or equal to 5% More than 0% but less than or equal to 5% More than 95% but less than or equal to 100%
11.2. Please state how much fuel, electricity, heat, steam, and cooling in MWh your organization has purchased and consumed during the reporting year: Energy type/MWh Fuel/84697;Electricity/220435;Heat/44399;Steam/;Cooling/
11.3. Please complete the table by breaking down the total "Fuel" figure entered above by fuel type: Fuels/MWh Natural gas/67432
11.4. Please provide details of the electricity, heat, steam or cooling amounts that were accounted at a low carbon emission factor: Basis for applying a low carbon emission factor/MWh associated with low carbon electricity, heat, steam or cooling No purchases or generation of low carbon electricity, heat, steam or cooling/0
12. Attachments NA
12. Further Information NA
12.1. How do your absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year compare to the previous year? Increased
12.1a Reason of change Emissions reduction activities, Divestment, Acquisitions, Mergers, Change in output, Change in methodology, Change in boundary, Change in physical operating conditions, Unidentified, Other
12.1a. Reason: Emissions value (percentage) Emissions reduction activities: 1/Change in output: 9.5/
12.2. Please describe your gross combined Scope 1 and 2 emissions for the reporting year in metric tonnes CO2e per revenue: Intensity figure/Metric numerator/% change from previous year/Direction of change from previous year/Reason for change 3E-05/metric tonnes CO2e/0/No change/No change.
12.3. Please describe your gross combined Scope 1 and 2 emissions for the reporting year in metric tonnes CO2e per FTE: Intensity figure/Metric numerator/% change from previous year/Direction of change from previous year/Reason for change 10.8/metric tonnes CO2e/4.6/Increase/Strong operational/economic growth and relatively less newly hired employees in same reporting period. Please note: no of employees used for calculations in 2012: 11793 and in 2011: 11283. These nos.
12.4. Please provide an additional intensity (normalized) metric that is appropriate to your business operations: Intensity figure/Metric numerator/% change from previous year/Direction of change from previous year/Reason for change 0.1/metric tonnes CO2e/8/Decrease/Strong operational/economic growth combined with the update of the IEA CO2-emissions since Sulzer's major GHG contribution stems from energy/electricity consumption. Note: scope is identical to scope used in the sustain
13.1. Do you participate in any emissions trading schemes? No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next 2 years
13.1b. What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? NA
13.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? No
14. Attachments NA NA NA
14. Further Information NA NA NA
14.1. Do you participate in any emission trading schemes? No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next two years No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next 2 years Yes
14.1b. What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? NA
14.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? No No Yes
14.2. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 3 emissions Third party verification or assurance complete
14.2a. Please indicate the proportion of your Scope 3 emissions that are verified/assured More than 0% but less than or equal to 20%
14.3. Are you able to compare your Scope 3 emissions for the reporting year with those for the previous year for any sources? Yes
14.4. Do you engage with any of the elements of your value chain on GHG emissions and climate change strategies? (Tick all that apply) No, we do not engage
14.4a. Please give details of methods of engagement, your strategy for prioritizing engagements and measures of success NA
14.4d. Please explain why not and any plans you have to develop an engagement strategy in the future Currently, scope 3 reporting is limited to fuel and energy related activities that are outside scope 3. Sulzer is adopting an LCA approach; collaboration on environamntal issues with customers, intermediaries, aso is slowly increasing. The new EU PEF regu
2. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/sites/2013/81/17881/Investor CDP 2013/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2013/2.Strategy/Sulzer_EPD_GSG.pdf NA
2. Further Information NA NA NA
2.1. Please select the option that best describes your risk management procedures with regard to climate change risks and opportunities NA Integrated into multi-disciplinary company wide risk management processes NA
2.1a. Please provide further details Sulzer's integrated risk management system applies to all Sulzer sites and helps to ensure the sustainable success of existing activities and the overall development of the company. The overall objectives of the risk management system are threefold: Su
2.1a. Please provide further details (see guidance) NA Sulzer's integrated risk management system applies to all Sulzer sites and helps to ensure the sustainable success of existing activities and the overall development of the company. The overall objectives of the risk management system are threefold: Su NA
2.2. Is climate change integrated into your business strategy? No Yes Yes
2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes Sulzer espires for leadership in energy-efficient solutions that support its customers in shaping new ways and markets to build more sustainable economies. Sulzer creates value for the company, its customers and its stakeholder at large by providing state
2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes (see guidance) NA Sulzer espires for leadership in energy-efficient solutions that support its customers in shaping new ways and markets to build more sustainable economies. Sulzer creates value for the company, its customers and its stakeholder at large by providing state NA
2.2b. Please explain why not NA NA NA
2.3. Do you engage in activities that could either directly or indirectly influence policy on climate change through any of the following? (tick all that apply) Yes
2.3. Do you engage with policy makers to encourage further action on mitigation and/or adaptation? No Yes Yes
2.3a. On what issues have you been engaging directly?: Focus of legislation/Corporate Position/Details of engagement/Proposed solution Energy efficiency/Support with minor exceptions/Sulzer experts participate in (technical) Working Groups that develop recommendations to the EU via CENELEC in the field of pump and eco-design, energy efficiency and standardization in pumps and electric mo
2.3a. Please explain (i) the engagement process and (ii) actions you are advocating NA Sulzer experts participate in (technical) Working Groups that develop recommendations to the EU via CENELEC in the field of pump and eco-design, energy efficiency and standardization in pumps and electric motors in particular, The European Commission want NA
2.3b. Are you on the Board of any trade associations or provide funding beyond membership? Yes
2.3c. Please enter the details of those trade associations that are likely to take a position on climate change legislation/Trade association Europump/Consistent/Europump supports the overall objectives of European environment protection and energy policy. The trade organization works with national and European programmes/agencies which aim at promoting and implementing energy efficiency measur
2.3d. Do you publically disclose a list of all the research organizations that you fund? No
2.3e. Do you fund any research organizations to produce public work on climate change? Yes
2.3f. Please describe the work and how it aligns with your own strategy on climate change Sulzer engages as a business partner in scientific research that addresses one aspect of Climate Change: change consumer behavior in favor of energy efficient products/ solutions. One example is its committment to a Swiss CTI project (predominately state-
2.3g. Please provide details of the other engagement activities that you undertake On a voluntary basis: Sulzer published externally verified EPDs according ISO 14025 standard that are registered via the Swedish IES (www.environdec.com). Sulzer regularly publishes technical publications that promote Sulzer innovative solutions for sus
2.3h. What processes do you have in place to ensure that all of your direct and indirect activities that influence policy are consistent with your overall climate change strategy? Sulzer has no speparate, stand alone overall Climate Strategy. The topic is integrated in the corporate strategic processes and activities. A regular update/exchange of information between Sulzer Corporate QESH & SD (coordination role) and other funct
2.3i. Please explain why you do not engage with policy makers NA
3. Attachments NA NA NA
3. Further Information NA Comments to 3.3a. Sulzer does not collect and aggregate these nos. on corporate level. In 2012, sites were ISO14001 certified. In the frame of these mgt systems, annual environmental improvement targets and projects are defined (internal obligation. T NA
3.1. Did you have an emissions reduction target that was active (ongoing or reached completion) in the reporting year? No Intensity target Absolute and intensity targets
3.1a. Absolute target/ID/Scope/% of emissions in scope/% reduction from base year/Base year/Base year emissions (metric tonnes CO2e)/Target year/Comment No Response
3.1b. Intensity target/ID/Scope/% of emissions in scope/% reduction from base year/Metric/Base year/Normalized base year emissions/Target year/Comment StS/Scope 1+2+3/100/0/Other: Net Value Added (NVA)/2011/0.11514/2012/Sulzer has a rolling year on year target to hold or lower the GHG-emissions in CO2-Eq. / kCHF NVA NVA is defined as is defined as EBIT plus personnel expenses Current scope 3 comprises
3.1c. What change in absolute emissions this intensity target reflects/ID/Direction of change anticipated in absolute Scope 1+2 emissions at target completion?/% change anticipated in absolute Scope 1+2 emissions /Increase/8.5/Increase/8.5/Sulzer expected revenue growth. In 2012, Sulzer sales reached a record high of 4,022 billions CHF (2011: 3,578 Billions). NVA was expected to increase in line since no major increase of personel cost was expected.
3.1d. Please provide details on your progress against this target made in the reporting year/ID/% complete (time)/% complete (emissions)/Comment /100/100/The expected positive impact from Sulzer's strong economic growth, e.g. in combination with the unanticipated International Energy Agency (IEA) CO2 emissions factor update by countries on fuel combustion positively impacted this ratio. As a resul
3.1e. Please explain (i) why not; and (ii) forecast how your emissions will change over the next five years NA NA NA
3.2. Does the use of your goods and/or services directly enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party? No Yes Yes
3.2a. Please provide details (see guidance) NA About two-thirds of all Sulzer products are energy intensive in use. The company’s resource- and energy-efficient solutions reduce overall costs and CO2 emissions by making the operational stage on customer site more efficient. Therefore, innovation and t NA
3.3. Did you have emissions reduction initiatives that were active within the reporting year (this can include those in the planning and/or implementation phases) No Yes Yes
3.3a. Please identify the total number of projects at each stage of development, and for those in theimplementation stages, the estimated CO2e savings/Stage of development/3.3a. Number of projects/Total estimated annual CO2e savings in metric tonnes CO2e Under investigation//
3.3c Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities. 0 2 13 Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities.
3.3c. What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities? NA Compliance with regulatory requirements/standards, Dedicated budget for energy efficiency NA
3.3c. What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities?/Comment Compliance with regulatory requirements/standards/Because Sulzer manages these activities on site level, the methods used by Sulzer's QESH officers and line management vary considerably. two examples are here provided An example for regulatory requireme
4. Attachments NA
4. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? - Further Information NA
4.1. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? 2 The number of corporate annual reports and voluntary publications (complete and/or underway) made about the company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance
5. Attachments NA NA NA
5. Further Information NA NA NA
5.1. Have you identified any climate change risks (current or future) that have potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Risks driven by changes in regulation; Risks driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA
5.1a. Climate change risks driven by changes in regulation Yes
5.1a. Please describe your risks driven by changes in regulation /ID/Risk driver/ Description/Potential impact/Timeframe/Direct/Indirect/Likelihood/Magnitude of impact /International agreements/Kyoto Protocol and international emission trading. The Kyoto Protocol is the only existing legally binding treaty in existence, and it gives clear guidance, but it phases out by the end of 2012. The UNFCCC meeting in Durban on t
5.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk and (iii) the costs associated with these actions Sulzer has four strategic focus areas: Corporation-wide operational excellence based on LEAN / Health and safety, Technology leadership, Outstanding Services and collaboartive advantage. Sustainability is integral part of Sulzer's decision making proce
5.1c. Climate change risks driven by change in physical climate parameters Yes
5.1c. Please describe your risks that are driven by change in physical climate parameters/ID/Risk driver/Description/Potential impact/Timeframe/Direct/Indirect/Likelihood/Magnitude of impact /Sea level rise/Flooding of production and service sites/Reduction/disruption in production capacity/1-5 years/Direct/More likely than not/Low-medium
5.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA Regarding rising sea level/flooding and hurricanes and infectious diseases: Sulzer operates several sites in the Caribbean hurricane belt; hurricanes are expected to become more severe and occurring at higher frequency. Expected damages are impacts on phy NA
5.1e. Please describe your risks that are driven by changes in other climate-related developments/ID/Risk driver/Description/Potential impact/Timeframe/Direct/Indirect/Likelihood/Magnitude of impact RP-01/Change in precipitation pattern/Changes in precipitation patterns may present a risk to Vale’s operations, as heavier rainfall may cause damage to equipment and logistic assets, reducing or even disrupting the production. In the first quarter of 2
5.1e.Climate change risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments Yes
5.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA Regarding reputational risks, Sulzer aspires leadership in eco-efficiency with its high quality, eco-efficient and reliable solutions. Failing to meet minimum quality and ecological legal requirements and above minimum ecological stakeholder expectations NA
5.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
5.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
5.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
6. Attachments NA NA NA
6. Further Information NA NA NA
6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Opportunities driven by changes in regulation; Opportunities driven by changes in physical climate parameters NA
6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? -Transparency Yes
6.1a Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in regulation? NA Yes NA
6.1a. Please describe your opportunities that are driven by changes in regulation/ID/Opportunity driver/Description/Potential impact/Timeframe/Direct/Indirect/Likelihood/Magnitude of impact /Product efficiency regulations and standards/Continuous improvement of energy efficiency of products -provision of service of equipments to maintain efficiency of equipment/Increased demand for existing products/services/Current/Direct/Virtually certain/
6.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity and (iii) the costs associated with these actions Selected risks and opportunities of identified megatrends are integral part of e.g., the full-fledged (biennial) and light (annual) Mid Range Planning (MRP) cycles, as well as cross and divisional councils such as the HR, QESH, Risk, Innovation and Techno
6.1c. Please describe the opportunities that are driven by changes in physical climate parameters Yes
6.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity and (iii) the costs associated with these actions Water scarcity jeopardizes people’s quality of life, whereas access to water is becoming an increasing problem around the globe. CAGR of waste water market (a potential source for fresh water) is estimated 5.7% for 2010–2016 for emerging economies and mat
6.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA NA NA
6.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
6.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
6.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA Although opportunities were identified (as summed up in Guidance document), incl. trivial ones such as increased reputation as a eco-efficient solutions provider or fluctuating socio-economic changes (in emerging countries, which are of strategic importan NA
7. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/sites/2013/81/17881/Investor CDP 2013/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2013/7.EmissionsMethodology/GHG Protocol Report 2013.pdf NA
7. Further Information NA Please find attached a .pdf (Sulzer GHG Protocol Report 2012) with the requested nos. for Q. 7.4 NA
7.1. Please provide your base year and base year emissions (Scopes 1 and 2)/7.1. Base year From Date:/To Date:/ Scope 1 Base year emissions (metric tonnes CO2e)/N39Scope 2 Base year emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) 2011-10-01/2012-09-30/19120/108190
7.2. Please give the name of the standard, protocol or methodology you have used to collect activity data and calculate Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions NA The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (Revised Edition) NA
7.3. Please give the source for the global warming potentials you have used Gas/Reference CO2/IPCC Third Assessment Report (TAR - 100 year)
7.4. Please give the emissions factors you have applied and their origin; alternatively, please attach an Excel spreadsheet with this data Fuel/Material/Energy/Emission Factor/Unit/Reference ///
8.1. Please select the boundary you are using for your Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas inventory NA Financial control NA Boundary used for Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas inventory during 2011-2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.2. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e NA Gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e for 2011 - 2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.2. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figures in metric tonnes CO2e 19120
8.3. Please provide your gross global Scope 2 emissions figures in metric tonnes CO2e NA
8.4. Are there are any sources (e.g. facilities, specific GHGs, activities, geographies, etc.) of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions which are not included in your disclosure? NA Yes NA Proportion of Scope 1 emissions that are verified/assured for 2011 - 2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.4a Reporting Period From/To/Source/Scope/Explain why the source is excluded 1 Oct 2011/30 Sep 2012/Very small sites/Scope 1 and 2/Most predominately very small sales and service sites or offices sites are not included in the data collection since their energy consumptions and related CO2-emissions are only marginal at best and th
8.5 Reporting Period From/To/Please estimate the uncertainty of the total gross global Scope 1 and 2 emissions figures that you have supplied and specify the sources of uncertainty in your data gathering, handling and calculations/Scope 1 emissions 1 Oct 2011/30 Sep 2012//Data Gaps; Metering/ Measurement Constraints; Data Management/Within the scope as defined in Q.8.4 and Sulzer's Sustainability Report 2012: (see: http://www.sulzer.com/en/About-us/Sustainability/Sustainability-Report-2012/Sustainab
8.6. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 1 emissions Third party verification or assurance complete Proportion of Scope 1 emissions that are verified/assured for 2011 - 2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.6a. Please indicate the proportion of your Scope 1 emissions that are verified/assured More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% More than 90% but less than or equal to 100%
8.6b Reporting Period From/To/Please provide further details of the verification/assurance undertaken, and attach the relevant statements: Type of verification or assurance/Attach the document 1 Oct 2011/30 Sep 2012/Limited assurance/Other: Part of SGS' annual sustainability report verification process (standard adopted SGS internal and GRI G3)/https://www.cdproject.net/sites/2013/81/17881/Investor CDP 2013/Shared Documents/Attachments/Investor
2013 Performance Band E C A NA
2013 Score 0 79 100 NA
0. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/sites/2013/81/17881/Investor CDP 2013/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2013/Introduction/Sulzer Sustainability Report 2012.pdf NA If you have not been presented with a sector module that you consider would be appropriate for your company to answer, please select the module below. If you wish to view the questions first, please see https://www.cdproject.net/en-US/Programmes/Pages/Mor
0. Further Information NA Please visit www.sulzer.com/en/About-us/Sustainability/Focus-Energy-efficient-Solutions for additional examples of energy effiencient solutions NA If you are in these sectors (according to the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS)), the corresponding sector modules will be marked as default options to your information request. If you want to query your classification, please email respond@c
0.1. Introduction - Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. NA Sulzer was founded in 1834 in Winterthur, Switzerland, and is a global partner offering reliable and sustainable solutions for performance-critical applications. Our innovative, sustainable solutions add value and strengthen the competitive position of o NA
0.1. Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. Sulzer was founded in 1834 in Winterthur, Switzerland, and is a global partner offering reliable and sustainable solutions for performance-critical applications. Our innovative, sustainable solutions add value and strengthen the competitive position of o
0.2. Please state the start and end date of the year for which you are reporting data. 2012-01-01
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Description NA Description of the company's product.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
ceo:numberOfRatings 1 0 4026 The number of ratings of the CEO
ceo:pctApprove 0 0 100 Percent of ratings of the CEO that were approving
ceo:title NA The title of the company's CEO
employer:numberOfRatings 1 6 6549 The number of Glassdoor users who have rated this company as a place to work.
Glassdoor Employer Ratings 1 3.8 5 The Top Companies for Work-Life Balance list is based on employee feedback shared in company reviews on Glassdoor.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Date Added To Sr List NA 41317.5417 NA Date added to the GRI list.
Guidelines NA GRI - G3 NA This field indicates which version of the GRI Guidelines is used for the reporting. As of publication year 2009, GRI only includes reporting that makes use of the G3 Guidelines, which were released in October 2006.
Integrated No No Yes GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
Publication Year 2013 GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
Region NA Europe NA Region the organization operates in.
Report Html Address NA http://www.sulzer.com/en/About-us/Sustainability/Sustainability-Report-2012 NA URL of the report location.
Report Pdf Address NA NA NA Location of a PDF version of the report.
Report Title NA Sustainability Report 2012 NA Title of the report.
Sector NA Equipment NA Industry sector.
Sector Supplements (Final) NA Not Applicable NA This field indicates if the reporting organization has made use of one of the final Sector Supplements and which one. If ‘not used’ is indicated, it means that one of the final Sector Supplements is applicable, but has not been used. If ‘not applicable’ i
Size NA Large NA GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Corporate Governance 3 0 0 The scores for each ESG scope issue ranges from 0-3. The scoring refers to the number of times the company was criticized in relation to that scope issue: 0 = little or no exposure in the past 4 years; 1 = 5 direct relations in the past 4 years; 2 = 10 direct relations in the past 4 years; 3 = 20 direct relations in the past 4 years.
Current RRI 86 0 0 The RepRisk Index (RRI) is a quantitative risk measure that captures criticism and quantifies a company's exposure to controversial environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues. It does not measure a company's overall reputation, but rather is an indicator of their reputational risk.The Current RRI value indicates the current level of criticism about a company.
Employee Relations 3 0 0 The scores for each ESG scope issue ranges from 0-3. The scoring refers to the number of times the company was criticized in relation to that scope issue: 0 = little or no exposure in the past 4 years; 1 = 5 direct relations in the past 4 years; 2 = 10 direct relations in the past 4 years; 3 = 20 direct relations in the past 4 years.
Environmental FootPrint 3 0.2 0 The scores for each ESG scope issue ranges from 0-3. The scoring refers to the number of times the company was criticized in relation to that scope issue: 0 = little or no exposure in the past 4 years; 1 = 5 direct relations in the past 4 years; 2 = 10 direct relations in the past 4 years; 3 = 20 direct relations in the past 4 years.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Value of USG Contracts (in millions) 990 52 1 Value of Iranian contracts.
Withdrawn NA Was the association with Iran withdrawn?
Nationality Switzerland Country the company is in.
On the list Yes Yes Is the company on the list.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
include_measurement 0 1 1 Does your COP identify targets, define performance indicators and measure outcomes?
references_anti_corruption 0 1 1 Does your COP contain description of actions, and when relevant policies, related to anti-corruption?
references_environment 0 1 1 Does your COP contain description of actions, and when relevant policies, related to the environment?
references_human_rights 0 1 1 Does your COP contain description of actions, and when relevant policies, related to human rights?
references_labour 0 1 1 Does your COP contain description of actions, and when relevant policies, related to labour rights?
starts_on NA 08/01/2012 NA Start Date
differentiation NA active NA At what level is the declarer?
ends_on NA 08/01/2013 NA End Date
format NA standalone NA How is your COP shared with stakeholders?
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Weighted score 1.2 3.3 5.9

Flags

(Other Indicators - things that don’t affect ratings but that help identify or classify companies)

SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
You have put report(s) in your cart
Go to my cart
Ok