CSRHub is the world’s largest CSR (corporate social responsibility) and sustainability ratings and information database.

Ferrovial is one of the world's leading private developers of transport infrastructure with over 100000 employees in more than 40 countries. Its activities span infrastructure management and maintenance, urban services & construction.

Ticker: FER-MC ISIN: ES0162601019
Address: Principe de Vergara 135 , Spain , Madrid , MAD , 28002 Website: Ferrovial S.A.
Phone #: 34-915-862500 CSR Web Area: SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Basic Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Ratings

  Overall Community Employees Environment Governance
Ferrovial S.A. 69 68 72 73 62
Construction
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
All company average 55 55 56 58 52
Spain
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Percentile Rankings

Rankings are in percentile terms, compared to other companies in the same industry and country Overall Community Employees Environment Governance
Ferrovial S.A. 99% 90% 92% 92% 80%
Construction
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Spain
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Special Issues:

Ratings History

Only subscribers can interact with the graph.

More CSR Rating Details

  Community Employees
Community Dev & Philanthropy Product Human Rights & Supply Chain Compensation & Benefits Diversity & Labor Rights Training, Health & Safety
Ferrovial S.A.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Construction
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
All company average 53 54 55 58 55 55
Spain
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Environment Governance
Energy & Climate Change Environmant Policy & Reporting Resource Management Board Leadership Ethics Transparency & Reporting
Ferrovial S.A.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Construction
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
All company average 57 58 57 50 55 51
Spain
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Percentile rankings

Rankings are in percentile terms, compared to other companies in the same industry and country Community Employees
Community Dev & Philantrophy Product Human Rights & Supply Chain Compensation & Benefits Diversity & Labor Rights Training, Health & Safety
Ferrovial S.A. 97% 81% 87% 90% 94% 92%
Construction
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Spain
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Environment Governance
Energy & Climate Change Environment Policy & Reporting Resource Management Board Leadership Ethics Transparency & Reporting
Ferrovial S.A. 94% 84% 96% 52% 87% 90%
Construction
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Spain
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

0 Special Issues Affect This Company (see a list of issues here)

# of Sources
Construction
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Overall database
Spain
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

CSRHub Has 32 Data Sources (18 Are Currently Active) for This Company

= sources impacting the current ratings
= sources not impacting the current ratings, but included in earlier ratings for this company
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Original Data Values

(unsubscribed users can see the list, subscribers can see the data details for most sources)

Data source name

Data source element name Minimum value Value provided by datasource Maximum value Data description
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Brand Value / Enterprise Value (%) -48.164682123 0.0675 316.6056 NA
Brand Value 2012 2905.2071 NA
BSI 50 70.6134 88.4717 NA
Domicile SPAIN NA
Enterprise Value NA 43058.72 NA NA
Reviewed ? YES NA
Sector Industrial NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Brand Value 2014 10 947.1471 87304 A brand strength is assessed by using our Brand Strength Index framework. This benchmarks the strength, risk and future potential of a brand relative to its competitors by assessing input measures, brand equity measures, and output performance across four
BSI 51.3 68 94.2 NA
Domicile SPAIN NA
Sector Industrial NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
0. Further Information NA NA NA NA
0.1. Introduction - Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. NA Ferrovial is the world's leading private investor in transportation infrastructures, with a workforce of appoximately 79,199 employees and operations in more than 20 countries. The Company manages key assets such as Canada's 407ETR highway and London's H NA NA
5.1e Identified climate change risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments? NA Yes NA NA
5.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA REP.1. Impact on Ferrovial’s reputation if the company does not meet its carbon reduction commitments(i) Potential financial implications would be related to (a) greater difficulties to access to capital markets in certain conditions, as the company could NA NA
5.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
5.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
5.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
6. Attachments NA NA NA NA
6. Further Information NA The emerging policy environment around emissions and climate change is one of the defining drivers of Ferrovial’s business sectors over the coming decades. In 2010-2011 the Group implemented the “Positioning 2015-2020 Project”, focused on a pro-active app NA NA
6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Opportunities driven by changes in regulation; Opportunities driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA NA
6.1a Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in regulation? NA Yes NA NA
6.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA OPR.1. Toll Roads: building a “Low Carbon Highway Concession” business model(i) Financial implications include (a) investments in R&D focused on developing technologies (IT systems) to make this kind of projects possible; (b) an increase in capital stream NA NA
6.1c Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in physical climate parameters? NA Yes NA NA
14. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/05/6305/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/14.EmissionsTrading/Madrid_Compensa[1].pdf NA NA
6.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA PCD.1. Water business drivers accelerated by global change (i) According to the US National Intelligence Council, more than 1,4bn people will be affected by water scarcity in 2025. That involves a global market estimated to be worth some $480 billion per NA NA
6.1e Identified opportunities that are driven by changes in other climate-related developments? NA Yes NA NA
6.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA REP.1. Reputation(i) Ferrovial is considered by analysts as one of the most sustainable firms. Ferrovial´s CO2 emission performance has improved over the last years. We believe that this effort is appreciated by investors, analysts and customers, giving NA NA
13. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/05/6305/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/13.EmissionsPerformance/AMEY_Carbon Footprint.pdf NA NA
11. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/05/6305/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/11.EmissionsScope2Contractual/Energía_origen.pdf NA NA
11. Further Information NA Ferrovial has a presence in different countries and within countries in many locations. In most cases these locations are not permanent, once the contracts are completed these are closed and new ones are open every year. This means that Ferrovial has man NA NA
11.1. Do you consider that the grid average factors used to report Scope 2 emissions in Question 8.3 reflect the contractual arrangements you have with electricity suppliers? NA Yes NA NA
11.1a. You may report a total contractual Scope 2 figure in response to this question. Please provide your total global contractual Scope 2 GHG emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 0 NA 17902000 NA
11.2. Has your organization retired any certificates, e.g. Renewable Energy Certificates, associated with zero or low carbon electricity within the reporting year or has this been done on your behalf? NA Yes NA NA
3.1e. Please explain (i) why not; and (ii) forecast how your emissions will change over the next five years NA NA NA NA
3.2. Does the use of your goods and/or services directly enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party? No Yes Yes NA
3.2a. Please provide details (see guidance) NA AIRPORTS(i) One of the goals of BAA is to reduce GHG of Scope 3 emissions. In particular, accessibility to the airport, aircraft ground emissions and in-flight emissions.- In order to reduce GHG emissions from the accessibility to airports, a Personal Mob NA NA
3.3c Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities. 0 6 12 NA
3.3c. What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities? NA Compliance with regulatory requirements/standards, Financial optimization calculations, Dedicated budget for other emission reduction activities, Lower return on investment (ROI) specification, Internal incentives/recognition programs, Other NA NA
5. Attachments NA NA NA NA
5. Further Information NA The emerging policy environment around emissions and climate change is one of the defining drivers of Ferrovial’s business sectors over the coming decades. In 2010-2011 the Group implemented the “Positioning 2015-2020 Project”, focused on a pro-active app NA NA
5.1. Have you identified any climate change risks (current or future) that have potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Risks driven by changes in regulation; Risks driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA NA
5.1a Identified risks driven by changes in regulation? NA NA NA NA
5.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA REG.1. CRC impact on Ferrovial's UK subsidiaries.(i) Financial implications have beeen evaluated around £5Million for the Ferrovial’s UK subsidiaries, in terms of cash-flow. Under the current CRC framework this could involves a real cost for the Group ar NA NA
14. Further Information NA Ferroser has offset all the emissions derived from the energy consumption at its headquarters, through planting various types of forest plants and trees. This has been achieved after signing up to the project 'Madrid Compensa' (Madrid Compensates), sponso NA NA
1.1. Where is the highest level of direct responsibility for climate change within your company? No individual or committee with overall responsibility for climate change Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board NA
1.1a. Please identify the position of the individual or name of the committee with this responsibility NA Ferrovial's strategy related to climate change is integrated into corporate strategy. Therefore, the issues related to climate change strategy are discussed in company´s committee. The way to articulate the climate change strategy across all business area NA NA
1.2. Do you provide incentives for the management of climate change issues, including the attainment of targets? No Yes Yes NA
13. Further Information NA Ferrovial´s business activities are numerous and varied. In some cases, if we analyze our businesses it is quite difficult to identify common “Activity related metrics” (except Cespa - Municipal waste treatment and BAA – Airport). To illustrate, in Cad NA NA
13.1. How do your absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year compare to the previous year? Increased Decreased Decreased NA
13.1a (i) If absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) have increased, decreased or remained the same overall compared to the previous year, state direction of change NA General Decrease NA NA
13.1a (ii) If absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) have increased, decreased or remained the same overall compared to the previous year, state the reason for the direction of change NA Decrease: Emissions reduction activities NA NA
13.1a (iii) If emissions have increased, decreased or remained the same overall, provide the emissions value (%) NA Decrease: , Increase: 0 , Emission value for which direction is not stated: NA NA
2012 Score 0 90 100 NA
2012 Performance Band E A A NA
2.3a. Please explain (i) the engagement process and (ii) actions you are advocating NA Strong relationship with regulatory bodies and governments are key, as a way to influence on regulatory trends by taking part in workshops, task forces and workgroups which are in charge of developing new legal requirements. REGULATORY TRENDS ON GHG COU NA NA
8.8. Are carbon dioxide emissions from the combustion of biologically sequestered carbon (i.e. carbon dioxide emissions from burning biomass/biofuels) relevant to your company? No Yes Yes NA
8.8a. Please provide the emissions in metric tonnes CO2e 0.01 121966 27263000 NA
Management 4. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/05/6305/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/4.Communication/Heathrow__climate_change_72dpi.pdf NA NA
Management 4. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? NA 14 NA NA
5.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA CLI.1. Adverse weather events increase in frequency, in airports owned by Ferrovial.(i) Financial implications are related to (a) increase of costs related to operating the airport, (b) claims of passenger due to delays and other inconveniences, and (c) r NA NA
2. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/05/6305/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/2.Strategy/Carbon Footprint Introduction.wmv NA NA
2. Further Information NA The video "Carbon Footprint Introduction" describes how the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions is part of Ferrovial's strategy and explains some of the reduction targets. NA NA
5.1c Identified climate change risks driven by change in physical climate parameters? NA Yes NA NA
2.1. Please select the option that best describes your risk management procedures with regard to climate change risks and opportunities NA Integrated into multi-disciplinary company wide risk management processes NA NA
2.1a. Please provide further details (see guidance) NA Ferrovial has a comprehensive risk and opportunities management system called Ferrovial Risk Management (FRM). FRM uses COSO scheme as its starting point, and is applied to all business lines, including subsidiaries in which Ferrovial has management capac NA NA
2.2. Is climate change integrated into your business strategy? No Yes Yes NA
2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes (see guidance) NA StrategyWe are dedicated to designing, financing, building and managing infrastructures and services in a responsible way, focused on satisfying the expectations of our clients and users, using the available resources efficiently and minimizing the enviro NA NA
2.2b. Please explain why not NA NA NA NA
2.3. Do you engage with policy makers to encourage further action on mitigation and/or adaptation? No Yes Yes NA
3. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/05/6305/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/3.TargetsandInitiatives/AUDITORÍA ENERGÉTICA.pdf NA NA
3. Further Information NA NA NA NA
3.1. Did you have an emissions reduction target that was active (ongoing or reached completion) in the reporting year? No Absolute and intensity targets Absolute and intensity targets NA
14.1. Do you participate in any emission trading schemes? No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next two years No, but we anticipate doing so in the next two years Yes NA
14.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? No Yes Yes NA
6.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
6.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
6.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
7. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/05/6305/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/7.EmissionsMethodology/DCM-P04-F05 Base year Evolution (ES).docx NA NA
7. Further Information NA MethodologyFerrovial in its procedure DCM-P04 - "Carbon footprint" covers the methodology for calculating carbon footprint. The calculation methodology is based on the Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol (WRI & WBCSD) as the most internationally accepted, maint NA NA
7.1. Please provide your base year and base year emissions (Scopes 1 and 2) NA NA NA NA
0.4. Currency selection Please select the currency in which you would like to submit your response. All financial information contained in the response should be in this currency. NA EUR(€) NA NA
1. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/05/6305/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/1.Governance/Q_E Steering_Committee.ppt NA NA
1. Further Information NA The attached document "Q_E Steering Committee" includes the chart. The attached "Q_E Policy" includes the principles of the Corporate Responsibility NA NA
8.7. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 2 emissions More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% NA More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% NA
11.1b. Explain the basis of the alternative figure (see guidance) NA NA
14.1b. What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? All of Ferrovial´s UK operations participate in UK Government´s emissions trading scheme called Carbon Reduction Commitment (CRC) that will enter into force shortly, once some discrepancies regarding the contents of the scheme will be resolved between the NA
8.1. Please select the boundary you are using for your Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas inventory NA NA NA NA
8.2a. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 92 NA 231902967 NA
8.3a. Please provide your gross global Scope 2 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 293 NA 8071070 NA
8.4. Are there are any sources (e.g. facilities, specific GHGs, activities, geographies, etc.) of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions which are not included in your disclosure? NA No NA NA
8.6. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 1 emissions More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% NA More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
8.7. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 2 emissions Third party verification or assurance complete Proportion of Scope 2 emissions that are verified/assured for 2011-2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.7a. Please indicate the proportion of your Scope 2 emissions that are verified/assured More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% More than 90% but less than or equal to 100%
8.7b Reporting Period From/To/Please provide further details of the verification/assurance undertaken, and attach the relevant statements/Type of verification or assurance/Relevant standard/Attach the document 1 Jan 2009/31 Dec 2009/Limited assurance/ISAE3000/https://www.cdproject.net/sites/2013/05/6305/Investor CDP 2013/Shared Documents/Attachments/Investor-8.7b-C3-RelevantStatement/2009 verification.pdf
8.8. Are carbon dioxide emissions from biologically sequestered carbon relevant to your organization? Yes
8.8a. Please provide the emissions in metric tonnes CO2 34299.24
8.8a. Please provide the emissions in metric tonnes CO2e 0.05 180546.24 13638000
9.1. Do you have Scope 1 emissions sources in more than one country? Yes
9.1a Reporting Period From/To/Please complete the table below: Country/Region/Scope 1 metric tonnes CO2e 1 Jan 2009/31 Dec 2009/Spain/493666
9.2. Please indicate which other Scope 1 emissions breakdowns you are able to provide (tick all that apply) NA By business division; By facility; By GHG type; By activity; By legal structure NA
9.2a Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by business division: Business division/Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) 1 Jan 2009/31 Dec 2009/Services (Amey,Amey-Cespa,Cespa, Ferroser, Eurolimp, Ferroser Infraestructuras)/461660
9.2b Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by facility: Facility/Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) No Response
9.2c Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by GHG type: GHG type/Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) 1 Jan 2009/31 Dec 2009/CO2/387375
9.2d Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by activity: Activity/Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) 1 Jan 2009/31 Dec 2009/Infrastructure maintenance and facility management (Amey)/40813
9.2e Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by legal structure: Legal structure/Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) 1 Jan 2009/31 Dec 2009/Parent company and subsidiaries under financial control including leased assets treated as assets of the consolidated group for financial accounting purposes, Part 1/0
0.3. Country list configuration Norway
0.4. Currency selection Please select the currency in which you would like to submit your response. All financial information contained in the response should be in this currency. EUR(€)
0.4. Please select the currency in which you would like to submit your response. EUR(€)
0.5. Please select if you wish to complete a shorter information request. NA
0.6. Modules NA As part of the Investor CDP information request, electric utilities, companies with electric utility activities or assets, companies in the automobile or auto component manufacture sectors and companies in the oil and gas industry should complete suppleme
1. Attachments NA NA NA
1. Further Information NA NA NA
1.1. Where is the highest level of direct responsibility for climate change within your company? No individual or committee with overall responsibility for climate change Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board
1.1a. Please identify the position of the individual or name of the committee with this responsibility NA Ferrovial's strategy related to climate change is integrated into corporate strategy. Therefore, the issues related to climate change strategy are discussed in company´s committee. The way to articulate the climate change strategy across all business area NA
1.2. Do you provide incentives for the management of climate change issues, including the attainment of targets? No Yes Yes
1.2a. Who is entitled to benefit from these incentives? All employees/Monetary reward/Top and medium executive levels at the corporate and business units have part of their salary set as a variable (incentives) and this is linked to the objectives achieved (individual and collective performance indicator). The
10.1. Do you have Scope 2 emissions sources in more than one country? Yes
10.1a Reporting Period: From/To/Please complete the table below: Country/Region/Scope 2 metric tonnes CO2e/Purchased and consumed electricity, heat, steam or cooling (MWh)/Purchased and consumed low carbon electricity, heat, steam or cooling (MWh) 1 Jan 2009/31 Dec 2009/Spain/79812/228169/167
10.2. Please indicate which other Scope 2 emissions breakdowns you are able to provide (tick all that apply) NA By business division; By facility; By activity; By legal structure NA
10.2a Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by business division: Business division/Scope 2 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) 1 Jan 2009/31 Dec 2009/Services (Amey, Amey-Cespa,Cespa, Ferroser, Eurolimp, Ferroser Infraestructuras)/23712
10.2b Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by facility: Facility/Scope 2 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) 1 Jan 2009/31 Dec 2009/Toll roads/12391
10.2c Reporting Period: From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by activity: Activity/Scope 2 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) 1 Jan 2009/31 Dec 2009/Infrastructure maintenance and facility management (Amey)/6912
10.2d Reporting Period: From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by legal structure: Legal structure/Scope 2 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) 1 Jan 2009/31 Dec 2009/Parent company and subsidiaries under financial control including leased assets treated as assets of the consolidated group for financial accounting purposes, Part 1/0
11. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/sites/2013/05/6305/Investor CDP 2013/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2013/11.Energy/2012_Ferroser_energía renovable.pdf NA
11. Further Information NA Both Ferroser and Cadagua purchased energy from renewable sources. Cadagua purchased energy derived from IDAM (desalination plant) in Alicante and Ferroser from its central offices. Certificates issued by electricity suppliers ensuring electricity from re NA
11.1. What percentage of your total operational spend in the reporting year was on energy? More than 0% but less than or equal to 5% More than 0% but less than or equal to 5% More than 95% but less than or equal to 100%
11.2. Please state how much fuel, electricity, heat, steam, and cooling in MWh your organization has purchased and consumed during the reporting year: Energy type/MWh Fuel/2140900;Electricity/323595.65;Heat/0;Steam/0;Cooling/0
11.3. Please complete the table by breaking down the total "Fuel" figure entered above by fuel type: Fuels/MWh Diesel/Gas oil/851931
11.4. Please provide details of the electricity, heat, steam or cooling amounts that were accounted at a low carbon emission factor: Basis for applying a low carbon emission factor/MWh associated with low carbon electricity, heat, steam or cooling Tracking instruments, Guarantees of Origin/36088.13
12. Attachments NA
12. Further Information NA
12.1. How do your absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year compare to the previous year? Decreased
12.1a Reason of change Emissions reduction activities, Divestment, Acquisitions, Mergers, Change in output, Change in methodology, Change in boundary, Change in physical operating conditions, Unidentified, Other
12.1a. Reason: Emissions value (percentage) Emissions reduction activities: 5.65/Change in output: 7.37/
12.2. Please describe your gross combined Scope 1 and 2 emissions for the reporting year in metric tonnes CO2e per revenue: Intensity figure/Metric numerator/% change from previous year/Direction of change from previous year/Reason for change 8.054E-05/metric tonnes CO2e/15.46/Decrease/In 2012, Ferrovial has decreased its emissions (scope 1&2) in relative terms by a 15.46 % compared to 2011. These reductions have been achieved by the main reasons: 1) Reduction of diffuse emissions in lan
12.3. Please describe your gross combined Scope 1 and 2 emissions for the reporting year in metric tonnes CO2e per FTE: Intensity figure/Metric numerator/% change from previous year/Direction of change from previous year/Reason for change 10.53/metric tonnes CO2e/9.61/Decrease/In 2012, Ferrovial has decreased its emissions (scope 1&2) in relative terms (Tneq. CO2/employee) 9.61 % compared to 2011.
12.4. Please provide an additional intensity (normalized) metric that is appropriate to your business operations: Intensity figure/Metric numerator/% change from previous year/Direction of change from previous year/Reason for change 28.17/metric tonnes CO2e/3.84/Decrease/Cintra, Ferrovial´s business division dedicated to toll road management, calculates emissions per km of highways managed (Tneq. CO2/km). In 2012, emissions per Km decreased compared to the previous year due to the im
13.1. Do you participate in any emissions trading schemes? No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next 2 years
13.1b. What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? NA
13.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? Yes
14. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/sites/2013/05/6305/Investor CDP 2013/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2013/13.EmissionsTrading/Factor CO2_emisiones compensadas.pdf NA
14. Further Information NA We attach certificate of offsetting NA
14.1. Do you participate in any emission trading schemes? No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next two years No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next 2 years Yes
14.1b. What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? NA
14.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? No Yes Yes
14.2. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 3 emissions Third party verification or assurance complete
14.2a. Please indicate the proportion of your Scope 3 emissions that are verified/assured More than 90% but less than or equal to 100%
14.3. Are you able to compare your Scope 3 emissions for the reporting year with those for the previous year for any sources? Yes
14.4. Do you engage with any of the elements of your value chain on GHG emissions and climate change strategies? (Tick all that apply) Yes, other partners in the value chain
14.4a. Please give details of methods of engagement, your strategy for prioritizing engagements and measures of success (i) Methods company uses to engage with the value chain.Ferrovial have strong relationship with regulatory bodies and governments by taking part in workshops, task forces and workgroups. (ii) Strategy for prioritizing engagements and how success is meas
14.4d. Please explain why not and any plans you have to develop an engagement strategy in the future NA
2. Attachments NA NA NA
2. Further Information NA NA NA
2.1. Please select the option that best describes your risk management procedures with regard to climate change risks and opportunities NA Integrated into multi-disciplinary company wide risk management processes NA
2.1a. Please provide further details (i) the scope of the process, i.e. the type of risks and opportunities considered by the process such as regulatory, customer behaviour changes, reputational and weather-related;Ferrovial has a comprehensive risk and opportunities management system called
2.1a. Please provide further details (see guidance) NA (i) the scope of the process, i.e. the type of risks and opportunities considered by the process such as regulatory, customer behaviour changes, reputational and weather-related;Ferrovial has a comprehensive risk and opportunities management system called NA
2.2. Is climate change integrated into your business strategy? No Yes Yes
2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes StrategyWe are dedicated to designing, financing, building and managing infrastructures and services in a responsible way, focused on satisfying the expectations of our clients and users, using the available resources efficiently and minimizing the enviro
2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes (see guidance) NA StrategyWe are dedicated to designing, financing, building and managing infrastructures and services in a responsible way, focused on satisfying the expectations of our clients and users, using the available resources efficiently and minimizing the enviro NA
2.2b. Please explain why not NA NA NA
2.3. Do you engage in activities that could either directly or indirectly influence policy on climate change through any of the following? (tick all that apply) Yes
2.3. Do you engage with policy makers to encourage further action on mitigation and/or adaptation? No No Response Yes
2.3a. On what issues have you been engaging directly?: Focus of legislation/Corporate Position/Details of engagement/Proposed solution Climate finance/Support/Ferrovial is currently providing solutions to the Spanish Government in order to spread urban renovation and refitting as a way to drive the Spanish construction sector toward a sustainable business. This product is named “Green re
2.3a. Please explain (i) the engagement process and (ii) actions you are advocating NA Ferrovial is currently providing solutions to the Spanish Government in order to spread urban renovation and refitting as a way to drive the Spanish construction sector toward a sustainable business. This product is named “Green refitting” and offers buil NA
2.3b. Are you on the Board of any trade associations or provide funding beyond membership? NA
2.3c. Please enter the details of those trade associations that are likely to take a position on climate change legislation/Trade association NA
2.3d. Do you publically disclose a list of all the research organizations that you fund? NA
2.3e. Do you fund any research organizations to produce public work on climate change? NA
2.3f. Please describe the work and how it aligns with your own strategy on climate change NA
2.3g. Please provide details of the other engagement activities that you undertake The Spanish Office for Climate Change (OECC) is carrying out the "ADAPT Initiative". The OECC aims to develop a methodology for analyzing the vulnerability of businesses located in Spain, to the impacts of climate change. The OECC has selected Ferrovial a
2.3h. What processes do you have in place to ensure that all of your direct and indirect activities that influence policy are consistent with your overall climate change strategy? The way to articulate the climate change strategy across all business areas is via Ferrovial´s Quality & Environment Steering Committee. Therefore, the issues related to climate change strategy are discussed in company´s committee. Any direct and indi
2.3i. Please explain why you do not engage with policy makers NA
3. Attachments NA NA NA
3. Further Information NA NA NA
3.1. Did you have an emissions reduction target that was active (ongoing or reached completion) in the reporting year? No Absolute and intensity targets Absolute and intensity targets
3.1a. Absolute target/ID/Scope/% of emissions in scope/% reduction from base year/Base year/Base year emissions (metric tonnes CO2e)/Target year/Comment GFE01/Scope 1+2/100/0/2009/783894/2020/In 2011, we conducted a project called "Carbon Footprint Target Project 2009-2020". It involved all Quality & Environment Departments in the different business areas. The main line of action was to analyze where
3.1b. Intensity target/ID/Scope/% of emissions in scope/% reduction from base year/Metric/Base year/Normalized base year emissions/Target year/Comment GFE02/Scope 1+2/100/21.3/Other: metric tonnes CO2e per million € of operational turnover/2009/105.36/2020/In 2011, we conducted a project called "Carbon Footprint Target Project 2009-2020". It involved all Quality & Environment Departments in the diff
3.1c. What change in absolute emissions this intensity target reflects/ID/Direction of change anticipated in absolute Scope 1+2 emissions at target completion?/% change anticipated in absolute Scope 1+2 emissions GFE02/No change/0///Ferrovial has established emission reduction targets in relative and absolute terms for all Group: - In relative terms (teq CO2 / turnover), the target is to reduce the indicator 21.3 % for the 2020 compared to 2009, and - In absolute
3.1d. Please provide details on your progress against this target made in the reporting year/ID/% complete (time)/% complete (emissions)/Comment GFE01/27.27/100/In absolute terms (teq CO2), the target is to reduce 168 Teq CO2. It is next to stabilize emissions for the 2020 horizon at 2009 levels, taking into account that the revenue forecast for the Group as a whole is 27% up on the base year. In
3.1e. Please explain (i) why not; and (ii) forecast how your emissions will change over the next five years NA NA NA
3.2. Does the use of your goods and/or services directly enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party? No Yes Yes
3.2a. Please provide details (see guidance) NA Ferrovial offers to the third parties an option to reduce their emissions by the use of our products or services.Some examples are listed below: INTEGRATED CITY MANAGEMENT (i) Ferrovial, through its business division Amey carries out an innovative pro NA
3.3. Did you have emissions reduction initiatives that were active within the reporting year (this can include those in the planning and/or implementation phases) No Yes Yes
3.3a. Please identify the total number of projects at each stage of development, and for those in theimplementation stages, the estimated CO2e savings/Stage of development/3.3a. Number of projects/Total estimated annual CO2e savings in metric tonnes CO2e Under investigation/0/0
3.3c Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities. 0 6 13 Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities.
3.3c. What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities? NA Compliance with regulatory requirements/standards, Financial optimization calculations, Financial optimization calculations, Lower return on investment (ROI) specification, Internal incentives/recognition programs, Other NA
3.3c. What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities?/Comment Compliance with regulatory requirements/standards/The emerging policy environment around emissions and climate change is one of the defining drivers of Grupo Ferrovial’s business sectors over the coming decades So, in 2010 Ferrovial started "Ferrovial Pos
4. Attachments NA
4. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? - Further Information NA
4.1. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? 5 The number of corporate annual reports and voluntary publications (complete and/or underway) made about the company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance
5. Attachments NA NA NA
5. Further Information NA NA NA
5.1. Have you identified any climate change risks (current or future) that have potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Risks driven by changes in regulation; Risks driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA
5.1a. Climate change risks driven by changes in regulation Yes
5.1a. Please describe your risks driven by changes in regulation /ID/Risk driver/ Description/Potential impact/Timeframe/Direct/Indirect/Likelihood/Magnitude of impact REG.1/Cap and trade schemes/Most of the Ferrovial UK subsidiaries are directly involved in the Carbon Reduction Commitment (CRC). CRC involves any activity consuming more than 6,000MWh/year of electricity. This scheme has been recently changed in 2013 (St
5.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk and (iii) the costs associated with these actions REG.1. CRC impact on Ferrovial's UK subsidiaries.(i) Financial implications have been evaluated around £5Million for the Ferrovial’s UK subsidiaries, in terms of cash-flow. Under the emerging CRC framework this involves a real cost for the Group around £
5.1c. Climate change risks driven by change in physical climate parameters Yes
5.1c. Please describe your risks that are driven by change in physical climate parameters/ID/Risk driver/Description/Potential impact/Timeframe/Direct/Indirect/Likelihood/Magnitude of impact CLI.1/Snow and ice/Adverse weather events increase in frequency, in airports in which Ferrovial is the major shareholder. Recent history shows the incredibly severe reputational and economic impacts of adverse weather events to airport activity and manage
5.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA CLI.1. Adverse weather events increase in frequency, in airports in which Ferrovial is the major shareholder.(i) Financial implications are related to (a) increase of costs related to operating the airport, (b) claims of passenger due to delays and other NA
5.1e. Please describe your risks that are driven by changes in other climate-related developments/ID/Risk driver/Description/Potential impact/Timeframe/Direct/Indirect/Likelihood/Magnitude of impact 2.3/Change in precipitation extremes and droughts/Any sustained adverse change in climate could have a direct adverse economic impact on us, such as water and power shortages, higher costs for water or energy to control the temperature inside of our facil
5.1e.Climate change risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments Yes
5.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA REP.1. Impact on Ferrovial’s reputation if the company does not meet its carbon reduction commitments(i) Ferrovial´s CO2 emission performance has improved over the last years, positioning the firm as one of the most sustainable companies within our activi NA
5.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
5.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
5.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
6. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/sites/2013/05/6305/Investor CDP 2013/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2013/6.ClimateChangeOpportunities/Enterprise_oportunidad.pdf NA
6. Further Information NA In the news attached "Enterprise_Oportunidad" we have a example how Ferrovial has found a business opportunity in the company "Enterprise". Enterprise is a company specialized in "low carbon" solution, in particular, energy and water distribution. NA
6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Opportunities driven by changes in regulation; Opportunities driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA
6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? -Transparency Yes
6.1a Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in regulation? NA Yes NA
6.1a. Please describe your opportunities that are driven by changes in regulation/ID/Opportunity driver/Description/Potential impact/Timeframe/Direct/Indirect/Likelihood/Magnitude of impact OPR.1/Fuel/energy taxes and regulations/Intelligent cities: Ferrovial Services division has implemented a very new business model based on integrating all kind of municipality services into only one PPP contract. This scheme involves relevant cost reducti
6.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity and (iii) the costs associated with these actions OPR.1. Intelligent cities(i) Ferrovial’s Intelligent Cities proposal is based on offering better services for cities, at a lower cost, as well as reducing significantly the energy consumption and GHG emissions. Just to give an example, a Spanish city of 1
6.1c. Please describe the opportunities that are driven by changes in physical climate parameters Yes
6.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity and (iii) the costs associated with these actions PCD.1. Water business drivers accelerated by global change(i) A broader market associated to the increase of water scarcity in several regions should represent a real opportunity for expanding the business of the water division of Ferrovial (Cadagua). Cad
6.1e. Please describe the opportunities that are driven by changes in other climate-related developments Yes
6.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA REP.1. Reputation(i) . Ferrovial´s CO2 emission performance has improved over the last years, positioning the firm as one of the most sustainable companies within our activity sectors. According to our own assessment, global investment according to SRI cr NA
6.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
6.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
6.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
7. Attachments NA NA NA
7. Further Information NA Ferrovial in its procedure DCM-P04 - "Carbon footprint" covers the methodology for calculating carbon footprint. The calculation methodology is based on the Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol (WRI & WBCSD) as the most internationally accepted, maintaining NA
7.1. Please provide your base year and base year emissions (Scopes 1 and 2)/7.1. Base year From Date:/To Date:/ Scope 1 Base year emissions (metric tonnes CO2e)/N39Scope 2 Base year emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) 2009-01-01/2009-12-31/659722/124172
7.2. Please give the name of the standard, protocol or methodology you have used to collect activity data and calculate Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions NA The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (Revised Edition)/Defra Voluntary Reporting Guidelines/ISO 14064-1/US EPA Climate Leaders: Direct Emissions from Municipal Solid Waste Landfilling/Other NA
7.3. Please give the source for the global warming potentials you have used Gas/Reference CH4/IPCC Second Assessment Report (SAR - 100 year)
7.4. Please give the emissions factors you have applied and their origin; alternatively, please attach an Excel spreadsheet with this data Fuel/Material/Energy/Emission Factor/Unit/Reference Other: Water supply/0.3441/Other: kg CO2-e per m3/2012 Defra
8.1. Please select the boundary you are using for your Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas inventory NA Operational control NA Boundary used for Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas inventory during 2011-2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.2. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e NA Gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e for 2011 - 2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.2. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figures in metric tonnes CO2e 659722
8.3. Please provide your gross global Scope 2 emissions figures in metric tonnes CO2e NA
8.4. Are there are any sources (e.g. facilities, specific GHGs, activities, geographies, etc.) of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions which are not included in your disclosure? NA No NA Proportion of Scope 1 emissions that are verified/assured for 2011 - 2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.4a Reporting Period From/To/Source/Scope/Explain why the source is excluded No Response
8.5 Reporting Period From/To/Please estimate the uncertainty of the total gross global Scope 1 and 2 emissions figures that you have supplied and specify the sources of uncertainty in your data gathering, handling and calculations/Scope 1 emissions No Response
8.6. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 1 emissions Third party verification or assurance complete Proportion of Scope 1 emissions that are verified/assured for 2011 - 2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.6a. Please indicate the proportion of your Scope 1 emissions that are verified/assured More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% More than 90% but less than or equal to 100%
8.6b Reporting Period From/To/Please provide further details of the verification/assurance undertaken, and attach the relevant statements: Type of verification or assurance/Attach the document 1 Jan 2009/31 Dec 2009/Limited assurance/ISAE3000/https://www.cdproject.net/sites/2013/05/6305/Investor CDP 2013/Shared Documents/Attachments/Investor-8.6b-C3-RelevantStatement/2009 verification.pdf
2013 Performance Band E A A NA
2013 Score 0 99 100 NA
0. Attachments NA NA NA If you have not been presented with a sector module that you consider would be appropriate for your company to answer, please select the module below. If you wish to view the questions first, please see https://www.cdproject.net/en-US/Programmes/Pages/Mor
0. Further Information NA NA NA If you are in these sectors (according to the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS)), the corresponding sector modules will be marked as default options to your information request. If you want to query your classification, please email respond@c
0.1. Introduction - Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. NA Ferrovial is the world's leading private investor in transportation infrastructures, with a workforce of approximately 57,276 employees and operations in more than 20 countries. The Company manages key assets such as Canada's 407 ETR highway and London' NA
0.1. Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. Ferrovial is the world's leading private investor in transportation infrastructures, with a workforce of approximately 57,276 employees and operations in more than 20 countries. The Company manages key assets such as Canada's 407 ETR highway and London'
0.2. Please state the start and end date of the year for which you are reporting data. 2011-10-01
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Description NA Description of the company's product.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
ceo:numberOfRatings 1 1 4026 The number of ratings of the CEO
ceo:pctApprove 0 100 100 Percent of ratings of the CEO that were approving
ceo:title NA The title of the company's CEO
employer:numberOfRatings 1 2 6549 The number of Glassdoor users who have rated this company as a place to work.
Glassdoor Employer Ratings 1 4 5 The Top Companies for Work-Life Balance list is based on employee feedback shared in company reviews on Glassdoor.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Guidelines NA GRI - G3.1 NA This field indicates which version of the GRI Guidelines is used for the reporting. As of publication year 2009, GRI only includes reporting that makes use of the G3 Guidelines, which were released in October 2006.
Integrated No No Yes GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
Publication Year 2013 GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
Region NA Europe NA Region the organization operates in.
Report Html Address NA http://memoria2012.ferrovial.com/en/index.asp NA URL of the report location.
Report Pdf Address NA http://memoria2012.ferrovial.com/recursos/doc/2012/Download/29464_858520139489.pdf NA Location of a PDF version of the report.
Report Title NA Annual Report 2012 NA Title of the report.
Sector NA Conglomerates NA Industry sector.
Sector Supplements (Final) NA Construction & Real Estate NA This field indicates if the reporting organization has made use of one of the final Sector Supplements and which one. If ‘not used’ is indicated, it means that one of the final Sector Supplements is applicable, but has not been used. If ‘not applicable’ i
Size NA Large NA GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Corporate Governance 3 0.2 0 The scores for each ESG scope issue ranges from 0-3. The scoring refers to the number of times the company was criticized in relation to that scope issue: 0 = little or no exposure in the past 4 years; 1 = 5 direct relations in the past 4 years; 2 = 10 direct relations in the past 4 years; 3 = 20 direct relations in the past 4 years.
Current RRI 86 23 0 The RepRisk Index (RRI) is a quantitative risk measure that captures criticism and quantifies a company's exposure to controversial environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues. It does not measure a company's overall reputation, but rather is an indicator of their reputational risk.The Current RRI value indicates the current level of criticism about a company.
Employee Relations 3 0.8 0 The scores for each ESG scope issue ranges from 0-3. The scoring refers to the number of times the company was criticized in relation to that scope issue: 0 = little or no exposure in the past 4 years; 1 = 5 direct relations in the past 4 years; 2 = 10 direct relations in the past 4 years; 3 = 20 direct relations in the past 4 years.
Environmental FootPrint 3 0 0 The scores for each ESG scope issue ranges from 0-3. The scoring refers to the number of times the company was criticized in relation to that scope issue: 0 = little or no exposure in the past 4 years; 1 = 5 direct relations in the past 4 years; 2 = 10 direct relations in the past 4 years; 3 = 20 direct relations in the past 4 years.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
include_continued_support_statement 0 1 1 NA
additional_questions 0 0 1 NA
cop_web_link NA http://www.unglobalcompact.org/COPs/detail/19473 NA NA
created_at NA 39764.4125 NA NA
differentiation NA active NA NA
ends_on NA 39416 NA NA
include_measurement 0 1 1 NA
meets_advanced_criteria 0 0 1 NA
method_shared NA gc_website NA NA
references_anti_corruption 0 1 1 NA
references_environment 0 1 1 NA
references_human_rights 0 1 1 NA
references_labour 0 1 1 NA
starts_on NA 39082 NA NA
title NA 2011 Communication on Progress NA NA
updated_at NA 39764.4125 NA NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
include_measurement 0 1 1 Does your COP identify targets, define performance indicators and measure outcomes?
references_anti_corruption 0 1 1 Does your COP contain description of actions, and when relevant policies, related to anti-corruption?
references_environment 0 1 1 Does your COP contain description of actions, and when relevant policies, related to the environment?
references_human_rights 0 1 1 Does your COP contain description of actions, and when relevant policies, related to human rights?
references_labour 0 1 1 Does your COP contain description of actions, and when relevant policies, related to labour rights?
starts_on NA 01/01/2012 NA Start Date
differentiation NA advanced NA At what level is the declarer?
ends_on NA 12/01/2012 NA End Date
format NA sustainability_report NA How is your COP shared with stakeholders?
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Weighted score 1.2 2.7 5.9

Flags

(Other Indicators - things that don’t affect ratings but that help identify or classify companies)

SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
You have put report(s) in your cart
Go to my cart
Ok