| [+] Transparency International | Click here to see the 2 items available from this source. |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 0. Attachments | | Not avail. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 0. Attachments | | Not app. | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 0. Attachments | | Not avail. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 0. Further Information | | Not avail. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 0. Further Information | | Not app. | | |
| [+] CDP Water Data 2010 | Click here to see the 2 items available from this source. |
| CDP Water Data 2012 | 0.1. Introduction
Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. | | HP is a leading global provider of products, technologies, software, solutions and services to individual consumers, small- and medium-sized businesses (SMBs) and large enterprises, including customers in the government, health and education sectors. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 0.1. Introduction - Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. | | We are guided by shared values and seven companywide objectives, which include a longstanding commitment to global citizenship. Larger than any organization or program, global citizenship at HP encompasses all the ways we go about aligning our business go | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 0.1. Introduction - Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. | | HP is a leading global provider of products, technologies, software, solutions and services to individual consumers, small- and medium-sized businesses (SMBs) and large enterprises, including customers in the government, health and education sectors. HP's | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 0.2 Index | | 123 | | |
| CDP Water Data 2012 | 0.2.
Reporting Year
Please state the start and end date of the year for which you are reporting data.
2.0. Enter the period that will be disclosed. | | 01-11-2010 - 31-10-2011 | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 0.2. Reporting Year
Please state the start and end date of the year for which you are reporting data.
2.0. Enter the period that will be disclosed. | | Sat 01 Nov 2008 - Sat 31 Oct 2009 | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 0.3. Are you participating in the Walmart Sustainability Assessment? | No | Yes | Yes | |
| CDP Water Data 2012 | 0.3. Reporting Boundary
Please indicate the category that describes the company, entities, or group for which you are reporting. | | Companies, entities or groups over which operational control is exercised. | | |
| [+] CDP Water Data 2010 | Click here to see the 2 items available from this source. |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 0.4. Currency selection
Please select the currency in which you would like to submit your response. All financial information contained in the response should be in this currency. | | USD($) | | |
| CDP Water Data 2012 | 0.4. Exclusions
Are there any geographies, activities, facilities or types of water inputs/outputs within this boundary which are not included in your disclosure? | | No | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 0.4. Modules - As part of the Investor CDP information request, electric utilities, companies with electric utility activities or assets, companies in the automobile or auto component manufacture sectors and companies in the oil and gas industry should co | | Not avail. | | |
| [+] CDP Water Data 2012 | Click here to see the 2 items available from this source. |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 1. Attachments | | Not avail. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 1. Attachments | | [link] | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 1. Attachments | | Not avail. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 1. Further Information | | It is vital that HP’s employees understand and support our global citizenship programs. Goals and objectives are set annually as part of HP's performance management and review process. Individuals with responsibility for achieving the goals are held acco | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 1. Further Information | | 2010, we established the HP Executive Environmental Advisory Council (EEAC) to provide objective environmental counsel to HP leadership. The EEAC’s insights help us better evaluate opportunities, set priorities, and assess progress in such areas as energy | | |
| [+] CDP Water Data 2010 | Click here to see the 2 items available from this source. |
| CDP Water Data 2011 | 1.1. Does your company have a water policy, strategy or management plan? | No | Yes | Yes | |
| CDP Water Data 2012 | 1.1. Does your company have a water policy, strategy or management plan? | No | Yes | Yes | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data | 1.1. Where is the highest level of direct responsibility for climate change within your company? | | Senior Manager/Officer | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 1.1. Where is the highest level of direct responsibility for climate change within your company? | No individual or committee with overall responsibility for climate change | Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board | Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board | |
| [+] Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | Click here to see the 2 items available from this source. |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 1.1a.
Please identify the position of the individual or name of the committee with this responsibility | | The Vice President of Environmental Sustainability and Social Innovation and her team work to unify and aggregate HP’s multiple points of climate/sustainability accountability into a common governance and reporting framework.
HP has also established an E | | |
| CDP Water Data 2011 | 1.1a. Please describe your policy, strategy or plan, including the highest level of responsibility for it within your company and its geographical reach-Transaprency & Reporting | No Response | Answered | Answered | |
| CDP Water Data 2012 | 1.1a. Please describe your policy, strategy or plan, including the highest level of responsibility for it within your company and its geographical reach-Transaprency & Reporting | Australia/CCA's Water Policy covers all aspects of water related operations activities from both municipal and groundwater sources across the beverage and food businesses. | Global/HP’s internal Environmental Health and Safety Policy, which applies to all HP employees, calls for aggressive resource conservation and waste reduction in operations and is inclusive of activities performed by HP’s suppliers. Additional guidance i | United States of America/We have a philosophy to limit water waste and a strategy to identify reduction opportunities from development through operations through supply chain. We build our stores to green building standards (LEED and Green Globes), and e | |
| CDP Water Data 2011 | 1.1b. Does the policy, strategy or plan specify water reduction, quality or efficiency targets or other water-related goals? | No | No | Yes | |
| CDP Water Data 2012 | 1.1b. Does the policy, strategy or plan specify water reduction, quality or efficiency targets or other water-related goals? | | Global | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 1.1b. Select the lower level department responsible. | | Not avail. | | |
| [+] CDP Water Data 2012 | Click here to see the 2 items available from this source. |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data | 1.2. Do you provide incentives for the management of climate change issues, including the attainment of targets? | | Yes | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 1.2. Do you provide incentives for the management of climate change issues, including the attainment of targets? | No | Yes | Yes | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 1.2. Please describe your policy, strategy or plan here: | | In 2009, we launched the Global Workplace Initiative to reduce the space we occupy, use resources more efficiently, decrease our climate impact and water consumption, and cut costs. The initiative has had the additional benefit of freeing up office buildi | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 1.2. What is the mechanism by which the board committee or other executive body reviews the company’s progress and status regarding climate change? | | HP’s governance and responsibility for actions related to climate change are the same as those established to manage all aspects of global citizenship.
HP’s Executive Council (EC) has overall responsibility for global citizenship as part of our business | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 1.3. Where is the highest level of responsibility within your company for the policy, strategy or plan? | | Board committee or other executive body | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 1.3a. Please explain how overall responsibility for climate change is managed within your company. | | Not avail. | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 1.3a. Please specify who is responsible. | | Other: HP’s executive council | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 1.3b. Please explain how overall responsibility for climate change is managed within your company. | | Not avail. | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 1.3b. Please specify who is responsible. | | Not avail. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 1.4. Do you provide incentives for the management of climate change issues, including the attainment of greenhouse gas (GHG) targets? | | Yes | | |
| [+] CDP Water Data 2010 | Click here to see the 5 items available from this source. |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 11. Attachments | | Not app. | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 11. Attachments | | Not avail. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 11. Further Information | | Not app. | | |
| [+] CDP Water Data 2010 | Click here to see the 2 items available from this source. |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data | 11.1. Do you consider that the grid average factors used to report Scope 2 emissions in Question 8.3 reflect the contractual arrangements you have with electricity suppliers? | | Yes | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 11.1. Do you consider that the grid average factors used to report Scope 2 emissions in Question 8.3 reflect the contractual arrangements you have with electricity suppliers? | | Yes | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data | 11.1a. You may report a total contractual Scope 2 figure in response to this question. Please provide your total global contractual Scope 2 GHG emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e | | No Response | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 11.1a. You may report a total contractual Scope 2 figure in response to this question. Please provide your total global contractual Scope 2 GHG emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e | 0 | Not app. | 17902000 | |
| [+] Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data | Click here to see the 2 items available from this source. |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 11.2. Has your organization retired any certificates, e.g. Renewable Energy Certificates, associated with zero or low carbon electricity within the reporting year or has this been done on your behalf? | | Yes | | |
| [+] CDP Water Data 2010 | Click here to see the 10 items available from this source. |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 13. Attachments | | [link] | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 13. Attachments | | Not avail. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 13. Further Information | | Decrease due to ongoing real estate consolidation, investments in energy efficiency, and increase in purchases of low/no carbon electricity. This is a netting effect as there has also been business growth that is not possible to isolate and quantify. The | | |
| [+] CDP Water Data 2010 | Click here to see the 2 items available from this source. |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data | 13.1. How do your absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year compare to the previous year? | | Decreased | | |
| [+] Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | Click here to see the 4 items available from this source. |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data | 13.1a If absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) have increased, decreased or remained the same overall compared to the previous year, state direction of change | | General Decrease | | |
| [+] CDP Water Data 2010 | Click here to see the 12 items available from this source. |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 14. Attachments | | Not avail. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 14. Attachments | | Not app. | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 14. Attachments | | Not avail. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 14. Further Information | | Not avail. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 14. Further Information | | Not app. | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 14. Further Information | | Not avail. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 14.1. Do you consider that the grid average factors used to report Scope 2 emissions in question 13 reflect the contractual arrangements you have with electricity suppliers? | | No | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 14.1. Do you know the total volume of water recycled and reused in your own operations? | No | No | Yes | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data | 14.1. Do you participate in any emission trading schemes? | | No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next two years | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 14.1. Do you participate in any emission trading schemes? | No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next two years | No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next two years | Yes | |
| [+] Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data | Click here to see the 2 items available from this source. |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 14.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? | No | No | Yes | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 14.2. You may report a total contractual Scope 2 figure in response to this question. Please provide your total global contractual Scope 2 GHG emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2-e. | | Not avail. | | |
| [+] CDP Water Data 2010 | Click here to see the 7 items available from this source. |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 14.3. Explain the origin of the alternative figure including information about the emission factors used and the tariffs. | | Not avail. | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 14.3. You may explain here why you are not able to report the total volumes of water recycled or reused in your own operations and whether you have any plans to put in place systems that would enable you to do so. | | While HP does recycle/reuse water, the volumes are not reported on a company-wide basis. Our current company-wide goal is tied to reduction of water consumption, so while reuse/recycling contributes to this goal, reuse/recycling is not currently a goal o | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 14.4. Has your organization retired any certificates, e.g. Renewable Energy Certificates, associated with zero or low carbon electricity within the reporting year or has this been done on your behalf? | | Yes | | |
| [+] CDP Water Data 2010 | Click here to see the 8 items available from this source. |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 16. Attachments | | Not avail. | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 16. Attachments | | Not avail. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 16. Further Information | | • [link]
• [link] | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 16. Further Information | | Not avail. | | |
| [+] Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | Click here to see the 9 items available from this source. |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 2. Attachments | | [link] | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 2. Attachments | | Not avail. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 2. Further Information | | [link]
Changing the Equation - [link] | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 2. Further Information | | Link to Communique signatories page: [link]
Helen Holder testifying in support of the regs (with AA recommendations) on behalf of the Business-NGO Working Group on 3 Aug 2010 Starts at time 2:02: | | |
| [+] CDP Water Data 2010 | Click here to see the 2 items available from this source. |
| CDP Water Data 2011 | 2.1. Are you able to identify which of your operations are located in water-stressed regions? | No | No | Yes | |
| CDP Water Data 2012 | 2.1. Are you able to identify which of your operations are located in water-stressed regions? | No Response | 4 answers | 4 answers | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 2.1. Describe your company’s process for identifying significant risks and/or opportunities from climate change and assessing the degree to which they could affect your business, including the financial implications. | | HP includes climate change as a factor in both risk and business opportunity discussions. HP reviews a broad spectrum of risks annually as part of our preparing our corporate securities disclosures and our internal enterprise risk management process. In | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data | 2.1. Please select the option that best describes your risk management procedures with regard to climate change risks and opportunities | | Integrated into multi-disciplinary company wide risk management processes | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 2.1. Please select the option that best describes your risk management procedures with regard to climate change risks and opportunities | | Integrated into multi-disciplinary company wide risk management processes | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data | 2.1a. Please provide further details (see guidance) | | Answered | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 2.1a. Please provide further details (see guidance) | | i. the scope of the process, i.e. the type of risks and opportunities considered by the process such as regulatory, customer behavior changes, reputational and weather-related; HP uses Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) at the enterprise, business, supply c | | |
| CDP Water Data 2011 | 2.1b. Please list the water-stressed regions where you have operations and the percentage of your total operations in that area-Transparency & Reporting | No response | No response | 2 answers | |
| [+] CDP Water Data 2012 | Click here to see the 2 items available from this source. |
| CDP Water Data 2011 | 2.2. Do you use other indicators (besides water stress) to identify operations which are located in regions subject to water-related risk? | No | No | Yes | |
| CDP Water Data 2012 | 2.2. Do you use other indicators (besides water stress) to identify operations which are located in regions subject to water-related risk? | | Not app. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data | 2.2. Is climate change integrated into your business strategy? | | Yes | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 2.2. Is climate change integrated into your business strategy? | No | Yes | Yes | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data | 2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes (see guidance) | | Answered | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes (see guidance) | | In 2011 we started an initiative called Positive Impact: our drive to help conserve more than we as a company consume. HP will apply our scale, portfolio, and partnerships to reduce our own environmental impact and to enable customers to be more efficient | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data | 2.2b. Please explain why not | | No Response | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 2.2b. Please explain why not | | Not app. | | |
| CDP Water Data 2012 | 2.2b. You may explain here why you are not able to identify which of your operations are located in regions subject to water stress or water-related risk and whether you have plans to explore this issue in the future | No Response | 3 answers | 3 answers | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data | 2.3. Do you engage with policy makers to encourage further action on mitigation and/or adaptation? | | Yes | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 2.3. Do you engage with policy makers to encourage further action on mitigation and/or adaptation? | No | Yes | Yes | |
| CDP Water Data 2012 | 2.3. Please specify the total percentage of your operations that are located in the regions at risk which you identified in questions 2.1 and/or 2.2 | | Yes | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data | 2.3a. Please explain (i) the engagement process and (ii) actions you are advocating | | Answered | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 2.3a. Please explain (i) the engagement process and (ii) actions you are advocating | | i. Engagement ProcessCollaboration is essential to developing shared solutions for complex environmental challenges. HP works regularly with governments, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), trade associations and other technology companies to understand | | |
| CDP Water Data 2012 | 2.4. Please specify the basis you use to calculate the percentages used for questions 2.1 and/or 2.2 | | WBCSD | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 2.4. You may explain here why you are not able to identify which of your operations are located in water-stressed regions and whether you have any plans to explore this issue in the future. | | HP actively manages all of its real estate at both the local and global level, and has a general awareness of water stressed regions at the global level, and operations within those regions. These factors are taken into account when developing new sites | | |
| CDP Water Data 2011 | 2.5. Are you able to identify which of your key water-intensive inputs (excluding water) come from regions subject to water-related risk? | No | No | Yes | |
| [+] Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | Click here to see the 5 items available from this source. |
| Climate Counts 2011 | 2011 Total Score | 0 | 83 | 88 | Overall score |
| DOD 2012 List of Top 100 Contractors | 2012 List of Top 100 Military Contractors | | yes | yes | |
| [+] Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | Click here to see the 2 items available from this source. |
| [+] Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | Click here to see the 11 items available from this source. |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 3. Attachments | | [link] | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 3. Attachments | | Not avail. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 3. Further Information | | [link]
[link] | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 3. Further Information | | Not app. | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 3. Further Information | | Not avail. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data | 3.1. Did you have an emissions reduction target that was active (ongoing or reached completion) in the reporting year? | | Absolute target | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 3.1. Did you have an emissions reduction target that was active (ongoing or reached completion) in the reporting year? | No | Absolute target | Absolute and intensity targets | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 3.1. Do current and/or anticipated regulatory requirements related to climate change present significant risks to your company? | | Yes | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 3.1. Is your company exposed to significant physical risks related to water in its own operations? | Don't know | No | Yes | |
| CDP Water Data 2011 | 3.1a. Please describe the current and/or future risks to your operations, the ways in which these risks affect or could affect your operations and your current or proposed strategies for managing them-Transparency & Reporting | No response | Not exposed to water related risks | 3 answers | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data | 3.1e. Please explain (i) why not; and (ii) forecast how your emissions will change over the next five years | | No Response | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 3.1e. Please explain (i) why not; and (ii) forecast how your emissions will change over the next five years | | Not app. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data | 3.2. Does the use of your goods and/or services directly enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party? | | Yes | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 3.2. Does the use of your goods and/or services directly enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party? | No | Yes | Yes | |
| CDP Water Data 2011 | 3.2. What geographical scale (e.g. country, region, watershed, facility) do you use to analyze water-related risk across your operations?-Environment Policy & Reporting | | Not app. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data | 3.2a. Please provide details (see guidance) | | Answered | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 3.2a. Please provide details (see guidance) | | i. Through our Positive Impact strategy, HP is pioneering products and solutions that help customers achieve more while reducing consumption and waste.
i/ii. For example:• HP Critical Facilities Services (CFS) helps organizations upgrade and modernize cu | | |
| [+] Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | Click here to see the 2 items available from this source. |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data | 3.3. Did you have emissions reduction initiatives that were active within the reporting year (this can include those in the planning and/or implementation phases) | | Yes | | |
| CDP Water Data 2011 | 3.3. Do you require your key suppliers to report on their water use, risks and management? | No | No | Yes | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 3.3. Please describe the ways in which the identified risks affect or could affect your own operations. | | Not avail. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data | 3.3b. What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities? Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities. | | 4 | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 3.3c Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities. | 0 | 4 | 12 | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data | 3.3c. If you do not have any emissions reduction initiatives, please explain why not | | No Response | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 3.3c. What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities? | | Dedicated budget for energy efficiency, Dedicated budget for other emission reduction activities, Employee engagement, Other | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 3.4. Are there financial implications associated with the identified risks? | | Yes | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 3.4. Are there financial implications to the identified risks? | Don't know | Not avail. | Yes | |
| CDP Water Data 2011 | 3.4. Is your supply chain exposed to water-related risks (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure? | No | Yes | Yes | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 3.5. Please describe them. | | From an operations perspective, any regulation that puts an upward pressure on the cost of energy would potentially increase our cost of doing business in that region (although likely not disproportionately compared with other businesses in our sector). | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 3.5. Please describe them. | | Not avail. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 3.6. Describe any actions the company has taken or plans to take to manage or adapt to the risks that have been identified, including the cost of those actions. | | HP is responding by aligning our global citizenship efforts with our business goals, focusing where we believe we can apply our technologies, resources and expertise to make the greatest impact.
HP is also supporting the development and promotion of clim | | |
| [+] CDP Water Data 2010 | Click here to see the 2 items available from this source. |
| [+] Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | Click here to see the 2 items available from this source. |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 3.8. You may explain here why you do not know if your company is exposed to physical risks and whether you have any plans to assess these risks in the future. | | Not avail. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 4. Attachments | | Not avail. | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 4. Attachments | | Not avail. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 4. Further Information | | [link]
Climate Change: Global issue brief [link]
[link] | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 4. Further Information | | Not avail. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 4.1. Do current and/or anticipated physical impacts of climate change present significant risks to your company? | | Yes | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 4.1. Is your company exposed to significant regulatory risks related to water in its own operations? | No | No | Yes | |
| [+] Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | Click here to see the 2 items available from this source. |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 4.3. Please describe the ways in which the identified risks affect or could affect your own operations. | | Not avail. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 4.4. Are there financial implications associated with the identified risks? | | Yes | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 4.4. Are there financial implications to the identified risks? | | Not avail. | Yes | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 4.5. Please describe them. | | These types of short-term and long-term disruptions to locations where we or our suppliers are currently located or ship could have financial implications. Short-term disruptions can cause revenue delays or increase manufacturing or shipping costs. Longe | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 4.5. Please describe them. | | Not avail. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 4.6. Describe any actions the company has taken or plans to take to manage or adapt to the risks that have been identified, including the cost of those actions. | | HP is committed to reducing its climate impact by continually making its global operations more energy efficient and seeking low-carbon energy sources where possible and thereby reducing some of the physical risk that climate change poses to our facilitie | | |
| [+] CDP Water Data 2010 | Click here to see the 2 items available from this source. |
| [+] Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | Click here to see the 2 items available from this source. |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 4.8. You may explain here why you do not know if your company is exposed to regulatory risks and whether you have any plans to assess these risks in the future. | | Not avail. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 5. Attachments | | Not avail. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 5. Attachments | | [link] | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 5. Attachments | | Not avail. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 5. Further Information | | Not avail. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 5. Further Information | | Please refer to Risk section of attached HP 2011 10-K report p. 16. | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 5. Further Information | | Not avail. | | |
| CDP Water Data 2011 | 5.1. Do water-related issues present opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure? | No | Yes | Yes | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 5.1. Does climate change present other significant risks - current and/or anticipated - for your company? | | Yes | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data | 5.1. Have you identified any climate change risks (current or future) that have potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply | | Yes | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 5.1. Have you identified any climate change risks (current or future) that have potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply | | Risks driven by changes in regulation; Risks driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 5.1. Is your company exposed to other significant risks (such as product or reputational risks) related to water in its own operations? | Don't know | No | Yes | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 5.1a Identified risks driven by changes in regulation? | | Yes | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data | 5.1a. Climate change risks driven by changes in regulation | | Yes | | |
| CDP Water Data 2011 | 5.1a. Please describe the current and/or future opportunities, the ways in which these opportunities affect or could affect your operations and your current or proposed strategies for exploiting them-Environmental Policy & Reporting | No response | 3 answers | 3 answers | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data | 5.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions | | Answered | | |
| [+] Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | Click here to see the 2 items available from this source. |
| [+] Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data | Click here to see the 2 items available from this source. |
| [+] Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | Click here to see the 2 items available from this source. |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data | 5.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; (iii) the costs associated with these actions | | Answered | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 5.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; (iii) the costs associated with these actions | | (i) While we do not disclose the financial implications of the risk associated with our reputation (5.1e1), we do consider it to be significant. HP’s reputation is built on the fact that global citizenship is rooted in values that have driven our company | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data | 5.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure | | No Response | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 5.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure | | Not app. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data | 5.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure | | No Response | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 5.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure | | Not app. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data | 5.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure | | No Response | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 5.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure | | Not app. | | |
| [+] Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | Click here to see the 2 items available from this source. |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 5.3. Please describe the ways in which the identified risks affect or could affect your own operations. | | Not avail. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 5.4. Are there financial implications associated with the identified risks? | | Yes | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 5.4. Are there financial implications to the identified risks? | No | Not avail. | Yes | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 5.5. Please describe them. | | We have no way to project them at this stage in a way that would be meaningful under accounting principles. To first order, the impact on HP is likely to be commensurate with the impact on global gross domestic product. | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 5.5. Please describe them. | | Not avail. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 5.6. Describe any actions the company has taken or plans to take to manage or adapt to the other risks that have been identified, including the costs of those actions. | | Our exposure would be very similar to other companies in the ICT sector. | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 5.6. Please describe any actions the company has taken or plans to take to manage or adapt to the risks that have been identified, including their impact on operating costs (positive or negative) and CAPEX programs. | | Not avail. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 5.7. Explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to other significant risks - current and/or anticipated. | | Not avail. | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 5.7. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to other risks. | | Although HP’s operations are not water intensive, we recognize that water consumption is a growing concern globally.
In 2009, we used 7,647 million liters of water worldwide, predominantly for domestic use in buildings, cooling and landscape irrigation. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 5.8. Please explain why not. | | Not avail. | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 5.8. You may explain here why you do not know if your company is exposed to other risks and whether you have any plans to assess these risks in the future. | | Not avail. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 6. Attachments | | Not avail. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 6. Attachments | | Not app. | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 6. Attachments | | Not avail. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 6. Further Information | | [link] | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 6. Further Information | | Not app. | | |
| [+] CDP Water Data 2010 | Click here to see the 2 items available from this source. |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 6.1. Do current and/or anticipated regulatory requirements related to climate change present significant opportunities for your company? | | Yes | | |
| CDP Water Data 2011 | 6.1. Has your company identified any linkages or trade-offs between water and carbon emissions in its operations or supply chain? | No | Yes | Yes | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data | 6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply | | Yes | | |
| [+] Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | Click here to see the 2 items available from this source. |
| CDP Water Data 2011 | 6.1a. Please describe the linkages or trade-offs and the related management policy or action between water and carbon emissions in its operations or supply chain?-Transparency & Reporting | No response | 2 answers | 2 answers | |
| [+] Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data | Click here to see the 2 items available from this source. |
| [+] Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | Click here to see the 2 items available from this source. |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data | 6.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions | | Answered | | |
| [+] Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | Click here to see the 2 items available from this source. |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data | 6.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions | | Answered | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 6.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions | | 6e.1 - (i) Based on our internal assessments, we know that environmental responsibility plays an important role in defining our brand and can help customers choose an HP product over our competitor’s offerings. This presents a unique opportunity for HP an | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data | 6.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure | | No Response | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 6.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure | | Not app. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data | 6.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure | | No Response | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 6.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure | | Not app. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data | 6.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure | | No Response | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 6.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure | | Not app. | | |
| [+] Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | Click here to see the 3 items available from this source. |
| [+] CDP Water Data 2010 | Click here to see the 2 items available from this source. |
| [+] Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | Click here to see the 5 items available from this source. |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 7. Attachments | | [link] | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 7. Attachments | | Not avail. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 7. Further Information | | Not avail. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 7. Further Information | | Emissions factors for 7.4 above (system only allows 2 decimal places):
Natural Gas 0.202 metric tonnes per MWh
Diesel .003 metric tonnes CO2e per liter
Purchased Electricity metric tonnes per MWh; appropriate to geographic location. - Over 770 sites in | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 7. Further Information | | Not avail. | | |
| CDP Water Data 2011 | 7.1. Are you able to provide data, whether measured or estimated, on water withdrawals within your operations? | No | Yes | Yes | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 7.1. Do current and/or anticipated physical impacts of climate change present significant opportunities for your company? | | No | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 7.1. Is your supply chain exposed to significant physical risks related to water? | Don't know | No | Yes | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 7.1. Please provide your base year and base year emissions (Scopes 1 and 2) | | Not app. | | |
| [+] CDP Water Data 2011 | Click here to see the 2 items available from this source. |
| [+] Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | Click here to see the 2 items available from this source. |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 7.3. Please describe the ways in which the identified risks affect or could affect the companies in your supply chain. | | Not avail. | | |
| [+] CDP Water Data 2011 | Click here to see the 2 items available from this source. |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 7.4. Are there financial implications associated with the identified opportunities? | | Not avail. | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 7.4. Are there financial implications to the identified risks? | | Not avail. | | |
| CDP Water Data 2011 | 7.4b. You may explain here why your company's withrawal of water does not significantly affect any water sources-Transparency & reporting | No Response | Answered | Answered | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 7.5. Please describe them. | | Not avail. | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 7.5. Please describe them. | | Not avail. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 7.6. Describe any actions the company has taken or plans to take to exploit the opportunities that have been identified, including the investment needed to take those actions. | | Not avail. | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 7.6. Please describe any actions the company has taken or plans to take to manage or adapt to the risks that have been identified, including their impact on operating costs (positive or negative) and CAPEX programs. | | Not avail. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 7.7. Explain why you do not consider your company to be presented with significant opportunities - current and/or anticipated. | | We do not believe that we have business opportunities associated with the physical changes that may occur as a result of climate change. Our opportunities lie with providing products and services that help conserve energy and thus reduce future greenhouse | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 7.7. Please explain why you do not consider your supply chain to be exposed to physical risks. | | The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report published in 2007 shows that unmitigated climate change would likely trigger a range of environmental problems that would impact agriculture, natural habitats and many communities in l | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 7.8. Please explain why not. | | Not avail. | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 7.8. You may explain here why you do not know if your supply chain is exposed to physical risks and whether you have any plans to assess these risks in the future. | | Not avail. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 8. Attachments | | [link] | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 8. Attachments | | Not avail. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 8. Further Information | | [link]
Change – Global issue Brief [link]
[link] | | |
| [+] CDP Water Data 2010 | Click here to see the 2 items available from this source. |
| CDP Water Data 2011 | 8.1. Are you able to identify discharges of water from your operations by destination, by treatment method and by quality using standard effluent parameters? | No | Yes | Yes | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 8.1. Does climate change present other significant opportunities - current and/or anticipated - for your company? | | Yes | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 8.1. Please select the boundary you are using for your Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas inventory | | Not app. | | |
| CDP Water Data 2011 | 8.2. Did your company pay any penalties or fines for significant breaches of discharge agreements or regulations in the reporting period? | Yes | No | No | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 8.2a. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e | 92 | Not app. | 231902967 | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 8.2B. What are the current and/or anticipated other significant opportunities and their associated countries/regions and timescales? | | HP recognizes that the costs of adapting to unmitigated climate change will likely far outweigh the costs of slowing it down. Our climate strategy involves harnessing the power of IT to drive greater efficiency across the global economy. The opportunity | | |
| CDP Water Data 2011 | 8.3. Are any water bodies and related habitats significantly affected by discharges of water or runoff from your operations? | Yes | No | No | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 8.3. Describe the ways in which the identified opportunities affect or could affect your business and your value chain. | | HP recognizes that the costs of adapting to unmitigated climate change will likely far outweigh the costs of slowing it down. HP is therefore investing in transparent, efficient and transformational technologies and applying these solutions throughout ou | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 8.3. Please describe the ways in which the identified risks affect or could affect the companies in your supply chain. | | Not avail. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 8.3a.
Please provide your gross global Scope 2 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e | 293 | Not app. | 8071070 | |
| CDP Water Data 2011 | 8.3b. You may explain here why your company's discharge of water does not significantly affect any water bodies or related habitats-Tansparency & Reporting | | Answered | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data | 8.4. Are there are any sources (e.g. facilities, specific GHGs, activities, geographies, etc.) of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions which are not included in your disclosure? | | Yes | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 8.4. Are there are any sources (e.g. facilities, specific GHGs, activities, geographies, etc.) of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions which are not included in your disclosure? | | Yes | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 8.4. Are there financial implications associated with the identified opportunities? | | Yes | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 8.4. Are there financial implications to the identified risks? | | Not avail. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 8.5. Please describe them. | | HP is responding by aligning our global citizenship efforts with our business goals, focusing where we believe we can apply our technologies, resources and expertise to make the greatest impact. | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 8.5. Please describe them. | | Not avail. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 8.6.
Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 1 emissions | More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% | Not app. | More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 8.6. Describe any actions the company has taken or plans to take to exploit the opportunities that have been identified, including the investment needed to take those actions. | | Please see attachment | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 8.6. Please describe any actions the company has taken or plans to take to manage or adapt to the risks that have been identified, including their impact on operating costs (positive or negative) and CAPEX programs. | | Not avail. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data | 8.6. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 1 emissions | | Not app. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 8.7.
Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 2 emissions | More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% | Not app. | More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 8.7. Explain why you do not consider your company to be presented with significant opportunities - current and/or anticipated. | | Not avail. | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 8.7. Please explain why you do not consider your supply chain to be exposed to regulatory risks. | | We do not believe that our supply chain is exposed to significant regulatory risks - through contractual agreements and EICC audits HP requires wastewater generated from operations, industrial processes and sanitation facilities are to be characterized, m | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data | 8.7. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 2 emissions | | Not app. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 8.8. Are carbon dioxide emissions from the combustion of biologically sequestered carbon (i.e. carbon dioxide emissions from burning biomass/biofuels) relevant to your company? | No | No | Yes | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 8.8. Please explain why not. | | Not avail. | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 8.8. You may explain here why you do not know if your supply chain is exposed to regulatory risks and whether you have any plans to assess these risks in the future. | | Not avail. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | 8.8a. Please provide the emissions in metric tonnes CO2e | 0 | Not app. | 27263000 | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 9. Attachments | | Not avail. | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 9. Attachments | | Not avail. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 9. Further Information | | [link] | | |
| [+] CDP Water Data 2010 | Click here to see the 2 items available from this source. |
| [+] Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | Click here to see the 4 items available from this source. |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 9.3. Please describe the ways in which the identified risks affect or could affect the companies in your supply chain. | | Not avail. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 9.3. Please explain why not and forecast how your Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions will change over the next 5 years. (If you do not have a target) | | Not avail. | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 9.4. Are there financial implications to the identified risks? | | Not avail. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 9.4. Please give details of the target(s) you are developing and when you expect to announce it/them. (If you are in the process of developing a target) | | Not avail. | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 9.5. Please describe them. | | Not avail. | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 9.5. Please explain if you intend to set a new target. (If you have had a target and the date for completing it fell within your reporting year, please answer questions 9.5 and 9.6) | | Not avail. | | |
| [+] CDP Water Data 2010 | Click here to see the 3 items available from this source. |
| [+] Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | Click here to see the 5 items available from this source. |
| Environmental Investment Organisation | Accepted or Inferred Scope 3 Intensity | 8547.1 | 1103.4 | 64.5 | Unless the company reports all 15 Scope 3 categories as defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Standard, an inferred figure based on the highest reported intensity for that sector, across the Global ET Universe, is shown |
| [+] CDP Water Data 2010 | Click here to see the 4 items available from this source. |
| ISOS Group Sustainability Reporting Assessments | Accuracy | 0.33 | 1.47 | 2.00 | The reported information should be
sufficiently accurate and detailed for stakeholders to
assess the reporting organization’s performance. |
| UN Global Compact 2011 | additional_questions | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| UN Global Compact 2012 | additional_questions | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| [+] SA 8000 | Click here to see the 2 items available from this source. |
| [+] Transparency International | Click here to see the 2 items available from this source. |
| Global Reporting Initiative 2011 | Application Level | Undeclared | B | A+ | G3 Application Levels indicate to which extent the GRI Guidelines have been utilized in the reporting and which set and number of disclosures have been addressed in the reporting. There are three Application Levels A, B and C, each with the option of decl |
| Global Reporting Initiative 2012 | Application Level | Undeclared | B+ | A+ | G3 Application Levels indicate to which extent the GRI Guidelines have been utilized in the reporting and which set and number of disclosures have been addressed in the reporting. There are three Application Levels A, B and C, each with the option of decl |
| Ceres Climate & Energy Resolutions 2012 | Ask | | Suppliers to issue sustainability reports | | |
| ISOS Group Sustainability Reporting Assessments | Balance | 0.53 | 1.73 | 2.00 | The report should reflect positive and
negative aspects of the organization’s performance to
enable a reasoned assessment of overall performance. |
| Better World Companies | Better World product rating | F | A- | A+ | Better World Shopper is a site dedicated to providing people with a comprehensive, up-to-date, reliable account of the social and environmental responsibility of every company on the planet AND making it available in practical forms that individuals can u |
| Brand Finance 2012 | Brand Rating 2012 | B | AA | AAA+ | |
| Brand Finance 2013 | Brand Rating 2013 | BBB | AA+ | AAA+ | |
| Brand Finance 2012 | Brand Value / Enterprise Value (%) | -4816.5% | 4.5% | 31660.6% | |
| Brand Finance 2013 | Brand Value / Enterprise Value (%) | 1.0% | 14.2% | 474.7% | |
| Brand Finance 2012 | Brand Value 2012 | | 1033.6612088 | | |
| Brand Finance 2013 | Brand Value 2013 | | 3466.5037693 | | |
| Brand Finance 2012 | BSI | 50.0 | 72.8 | 88.5 | |
| Brand Finance 2013 | BSI | 50.0 | 72.8 | 89.6 | |
| [+] Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data | Click here to see the 2 items available from this source. |
| Goodness 500 2012 | Cash donated | 0 | 5052578 | 369570300 | In US$. |
| Ceres Climate & Energy Resolutions 2012 | Categories | | Human Rights;Supply Chain;Sustainability Reporting;Worker Safety | | |
| Environmental Investment Organisation | Category | No Public Data | Public, Complete, and Unverified data | Public, Complete, and Verified data | Companies are placed into one of four data or 'disclosure' categories: 1) Public, Complete, and Verified data; 2)
Public, Complete, and Unverified data;
3) Public, Incomplete, Verified or Unverified data;
4) No Public Data |
| SA 8000 | Certification Body | | BSI | | What body provided the SA8000 certification? |
| ISOS Group Sustainability Reporting Assessments | Clarity | 0.80 | 1.70 | 2.00 | Information should be made available in
a manner that is understandable and accessible to
stakeholders using the report |
| CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2011 | Climate Change Rank | 352 | 32 | 1 | |
| Environmental Investment Organisation | Combined Scope 1+2+3 Intensity | 12161.7 | 566.5 | 34.2 | Combined Scope 1+2_3 Intensity is calculated by adding together a company's Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions at 100% (disclosed or inferred) + 50% of Scope 3 emissions (disclosed or inferred). Inferred figures are based on the highest reported intensity for |
| ISOS Group Sustainability Reporting Assessments | Commitment to Society and to Human Rights Protection Policies | 1.45 | 3.20 | 3.91 | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | Comms Index | | 1434 | | |
| [+] ISOS Group Sustainability Reporting Assessments | Click here to see the 2 items available from this source. |
| The Center for Political Accountability 2011 | Compliance/Oversight (Percent of Max 28 points) | 0 | 39 | 100 | |
| UN Global Compact 2011 | cop_web_link | | [link] | | |
| UN Global Compact 2012 | cop_web_link | | [link] | | |
| CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2011 | Corporate Governance Rank | 913 | 1 | 1 | |
| Corporate Knights Global 100 - 2011 | Corporate Knights Canada Global 100 2011 | 100 | 75 | 1 | |
| Global Reporting Initiative 2011 | Country | | United States of America | | Country the organization is headquartered in. |
| SA 8000 | Country | | Italy | | The country the facility is located in. |
| Global Reporting Initiative 2011 | Country (HQ) | | United States of America | | |
| Global Reporting Initiative 2012 | Country (HQ) | | United States of America | | |
| UN Global Compact 2011 | created_at | | 39204.732662 | | |
| UN Global Compact 2012 | created_at | | 39633.872326 | | |
| Global Reporting Initiative 2011 | Date Added To Sr List | | 11/05/11 | | Date added to the GRI list. |
| Global Reporting Initiative 2012 | Date Added To Sr List | | 06-04-2012 | | |
| SA 8000 | Date of Initial Certification | | 5/4/2007 | | Date the facility was initially certified. |
| Global Reporting Initiative 2011 | Declared as | | Self-declared | Third-party-checked | |
| UN Global Compact 2011 | differentiation | | active | | |
| UN Global Compact 2012 | differentiation | | active | | |
| Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2011 | Disclosure | 0.0 | 63.7 | 99.6 | For the first time this year, environmental disclosure was included as a stand-alone score to assess each company’s transparency with regard to its environmental performance. Specifically, this score evaluates the breadth and quality of company environmen |
| Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2012 | Disclosure | 0.0 | 68.7 | 100.0 | Environmental disclosure was included as a stand-alone score to assess each company’s transparency with regard to its environmental performance. Specifically, this score evaluates the breadth and quality of company environmen |
| Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2011 | Disclosure | 0.0 | 63.7 | 99.9 | For the first time this year, environmental disclosure was included as a stand-alone score to assess each company’s transparency with regard to its environmental performance. Specifically, this score evaluates the breadth and quality of company environmen |
| Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2012 | Disclosure | 0.0 | 68.7 | 100.0 | Environmental disclosure was included as a stand-alone score to assess each company’s transparency with regard to its environmental performance. Specifically, this score evaluates the breadth and quality of company environmen |
| The Center for Political Accountability 2011 | Disclosure (Percent of Max 23 points) | 0 | 54 | 100 | |
| [+] Transparency International | Click here to see the 2 items available from this source. |
| Div50 2011 | DiversityBusiness.com Div50 2011 | 50 | 24 | 1 | Rank on a list of companies selected as the most diverse by Diversity Business. |
| [+] Transparency International | Click here to see the 19 items available from this source. |
| Brand Finance 2012 | Domicile | | UNITED STATES | | |
| Brand Finance 2013 | Domicile | | UNITED STATES | | |
| ISOS Group Sustainability Reporting Assessments | Economic Integrity | 1.90 | 3.00 | 3.61 | |
| [+] Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | Click here to see the 4 items available from this source. |
| CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2011 | Employee Relations | 330 | 9 | 1 | |
| UN Global Compact 2011 | ends_on | | 38990 | | |
| UN Global Compact 2012 | ends_on | | 39355 | | |
| Brand Finance 2012 | Enterprise Value | | 22732.74 | | |
| ISOS Group Sustainability Reporting Assessments | Environmental protection policies | 1.78 | 3.40 | 3.60 | |
| CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2011 | Environmental Rank | 276 | 5 | 1 | |
| Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2011 | Envtl. Impact | 0.2 | 66.7 | 88.5 | Based on data compiled by Trucost, this is a comprehensive, quantitative, and standardized measurement of the overall environmental impact of a company’s global operations. More than 700 metrics—including emissions of nine key greenhouse gases, water use, |
| Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2012 | Envtl. Impact | 0.0 | 67.2 | 89.0 | Based on data compiled by Trucost, this is a comprehensive, quantitative, and standardized measurement of the overall environmental impact of a company’s global operations. More than 700 metrics—including emissions of nine key greenhouse gases, water use, |
| Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2011 | Envtl. Impact | 0.2 | 66.7 | 88.2 | Based on data compiled by Trucost, this is a comprehensive, quantitative, and standardized measurement of the overall environmental impact of a company’s global operations. More than 700 metrics—including emissions of nine key greenhouse gases, water use, |
| Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2012 | Envtl. Impact | 11.3 | 67.2 | 87.3 | Based on data compiled by Trucost, this is a comprehensive, quantitative, and standardized measurement of the overall environmental impact of a company’s global operations. More than 700 metrics—including emissions of nine key greenhouse gases, water use, |
| Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2011 | Envtl. Mgmt. | 26.7 | 87.6 | 96.2 | Based on an analysis of companies tracked in Sustainalytics’ Global Platform, the Environmental Management Score is an assessment of how a company manages its environmental performance through policies, programs, targets, certifications, and the like. To |
| Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2012 | Envtl. Mgmt. | 21.3 | 91.9 | 91.9 | Based on an analysis of companies tracked in Sustainalytics’ Global Platform, the Environmental Management Score is an assessment of how a company manages its environmental performance through policies, programs, targets, certifications, and the like. To |
| Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2011 | Envtl. Mgmt. | 28.7 | 87.6 | 96.2 | Based on an analysis of companies tracked in Sustainalytics’ Global Platform, the Environmental Management Score is an assessment of how a company manages its environmental performance through policies, programs, targets, certifications, and the like. To |
| Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2012 | Envtl. Mgmt. | 28.6 | 91.9 | 91.9 | Based on an analysis of companies tracked in Sustainalytics’ Global Platform, the Environmental Management Score is an assessment of how a company manages its environmental performance through policies, programs, targets, certifications, and the like. To |
| EPEAT | EPEAT manufacturer number of certified products | 2 | 0 | 188 | |
| Equal Opportunity 2011 | Equal Opportunity top 50 companies 2011 | 50 | 16 | 1 | Rank on the Equal Opportunity 2011 List. |
| Goodness 500 2012 | Executive Diversity | 0.0% | 23.0% | 41.0% | Percentage of officers and directors that are female. |
| Ceres Climate & Energy Resolutions 2012 | Filer | | New York City Office of the Comptroller | | |
| CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2011 | Financial Risk | 968 | 464 | 1 | |
| UN Global Compact 2011 | format | | sustainability_report | | |
| UN Global Compact 2012 | format | | sustainability_report | | |
| Glassdoor | Glassdoor Employer Ratings | 1.0 | 2.4 | 5.0 | The Top Companies for Work-Life Balance list is based on employee feedback shared in company reviews on Glassdoor. |
| Environmental Investment Organisation | Global 800 Carbon Rank | 800 | 180 | 1 | Carbon Ranking of 800 international companies. Ranking is determined by EIO Methodology. See Source Info sheet for comments on it |
| World Economic Forum Members | Global Growth Companies | | Not app. | Yes | Eligible Global Growth Companies demonstrate annual revenue between US$ 100 million and US$ 5 billion, and an average year-to-year growth rate of 15%. Importantly, GGC members are building a global business beyond their traditional markets and are committed to having a positive effect on the economies and societies in which they operate. |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | Governance Index | | 1434 | | |
| The Center for Political Accountability 2011 | Grand Total (Percent of Max 69 points) | 0 | 59 | 100 | |
| Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2011 | Green Score | 19.9 | 75.8 | 82.5 | This score is derived from three component scores: an Environmental Impact Score, an Environmental Management Score, and an Environmental Disclosure Score; weighted at 45 percent, 45 percent, and 10 percent, respectively. |
| Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2012 | Green Score | 21.4 | 78.5 | 82.9 | |
| Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2011 | Green Score | 17.5 | 75.8 | 83.6 | This score is derived from three component scores: an Environmental Impact Score, an Environmental Management Score, and an Environmental Disclosure Score; weighted at 45 percent, 45 percent, and 10 percent, respectively. |
| Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2012 | Green Score | 0.0 | 78.5 | 100.0 | |
| Global Reporting Initiative 2011 | Guidelines | | GRI - G3 | | This field indicates which version of the GRI Guidelines is used for the reporting. As of publication year 2009, GRI only includes reporting that makes use of the G3 Guidelines, which were released in October 2006. |
| Global Reporting Initiative 2012 | Guidelines | | GRI - G3 | | |
| Transparency International | Home Country | | United States | | Country where company originated, or company's place of domocile. |
| Human Rights Campaign 2012 List | HRC Rating 2012 | -25 | 100 | 100 | |
| CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2011 | Human Rights Rank | 236 | 25 | 1 | |
| Global Reporting Initiative 2011 | IFC | No | No | Yes | Indicates whether company's report include references to the International Finance Corporation's (IFC) Sustainability Performance Standards |
| Global Reporting Initiative 2012 | IFC | No | No | Yes | Indicates whether company's report include references to the International Finance Corporation's (IFC) Sustainability Performance Standards |
| [+] CDP Water Data 2010 | Click here to see the 3 items available from this source. |
| UN Global Compact 2011 | include_continued_support_statement | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| UN Global Compact 2012 | include_continued_support_statement | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| UN Global Compact 2011 | include_measurement | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| UN Global Compact 2012 | include_measurement | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| SA 8000 | Industry | | Information Technology | | Industry of the facility |
| World Economic Forum Members | Industry Partners | | Yes | Yes | Industry Partners come from a broad range of business sectors, including construction, aviation, technology, tourism, food and beverage, energy, engineering and construction, and financial services. These companies are alert to the global issues that most affect their specific industry sector. |
| Global Reporting Initiative 2011 | Integrated | No | No | Yes | GRI keeps track if reporting organizations publish a sustainability report or an integrated report. For those reports that are labeled as ‘integrated reports’, the reporting organization claims that it has disclosed both financial and non-financial inform |
| Transparency International | Is there a policy that explicitly forbids facilitation payments? | | 0 | | |
| Global Reporting Initiative 2011 | ISO | | No | | Indicates whether company's report include references to ISO Standards |
| Global Reporting Initiative 2012 | ISO | | No | | |
| Tea Party Patriots Boycott List | List of companies deemed unpatriotic by members of the Tea Party Patriots | | yes | Yes | |
| Copenhagen Communique | List of the companies who have helped develop or support the Copenhagen Communique | | Yes | Yes | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | Management 4. Attachments | | [link] | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data | Management 4. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? | | 1 | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data | Management 4. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? | | 2 | | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | Management Index | | 123 | | |
| Environmental Investment Organisation | Market Value ($Million) | 1667.9 | 50899.7 | 358143.1 | A company's market value, or market capitalism (number of shares times x share price). This value was taken on 23.08.2011 |
| [+] ISOS Group Sustainability Reporting Assessments | Click here to see the 2 items available from this source. |
| UN Global Compact 2011 | meets_advanced_criteria | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| UN Global Compact 2012 | meets_advanced_criteria | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Electronic Industry Citizenship Coalition | Member of the Electronic Industry Citizenship Coalition | | Yes | Yes | EICC Code of Conduct provides guidance in five critical areas of CSR performance: Labor, Health and Safety, Environment, Management System, and Ethics. |
| UN Global Compact 2011 | method_shared | | stakeholders | | |
| UN Global Compact 2012 | method_shared | | all_access | | |
| BlackEngineer Most Admired Companies 2009 | Most Admired Companies for Minority Professionals in 2009 | 100 | 21 | 1 | Most Admired Companies for Minority Professionals in 2009 were chosen based on a survey completed by hundreds of respondents that consists of 64 questions given to Hispanic, Native American, Asian, black, and other employees in science, technology, engine |
| BlackEngineer Most Admired Companies 2011 | Most Admired Companies for Minority Professionals in 2011 | Killer's Row | The Roaring Forty | The Top Twenty | Most Admired Companies for Minority Professionals in 2011 were chosen based on a survey completed by hundreds of respondents that consists of 64 questions given to Hispanic, Native American, Asian, black, and other employees in science, technology, engine |
| NASDAQ OMX CRD Global Sustainability Index | NASDAQ OMX CRD Global Sustainability Index | | Yes | Yes | The NASDAQ OMX CRD Global Sustainability Index is an equally weighted equity index that serves as a benchmark for stocks of companies that are taking a leadership role in sustainability performance reporting and are traded on a major US stock exchange. Th |
| Transparency International | No. of Foreign countries of operations | 5 | 64 | 96 | Country other than where the company originated, or company's place of domocile. |
| [+] Environmental Investment Organisation | Click here to see the 2 items available from this source. |
| Global Reporting Initiative 2011 | OECD | | OECD | | This field indicates whether the country in which the reporting organization is located is a member of the OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation) or if the country receives assistance from the Development Assistance Committee (DAC).
The DAC count |
| Global Reporting Initiative 2012 | OECD | | No | | |
| FCPA Corporate Investigations | On FCPA Corporate Investigations List | | Yes | Yes | |
| [+] CDP Water Data 2010 | Click here to see the 4 items available from this source. |
| Goodness 500 2012 | Percentage of Profit | 0.0% | 0.3% | 108.6% | Percentage of profit donated. |
| CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2011 | Philanthropy Rank | 492 | 8 | 1 | |
| The Center for Political Accountability 2011 | Policies (Percent of Max 18 points) | 0 | 94 | 100 | |
| Climate Counts 2011 | Policy Stance | -7 | 9 | 10 | Does the company explicitly SUPPORT (or suggest a desire to block) progressive climate legislation? |
| Climate Counts 2012 | Policy Stance | 0 | 9 | 10 | |
| Global Reporting Initiative 2011 | Publication Year | | 2011 | | Year the report was published. |
| CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2011 | Rank | 100 | 9 | 1 | |
| CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2012 | Rank | 100 | 27 | 1 | |
| Global 100 List 2011 | Rank | 100 | 75 | 1 | |
| Goodness 500 2012 | Rank | 500 | 141 | 1 | |
| Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2011 | Rank | 1 | 2 | 500 | Overall rank on the Newsweek US Green Ranking |
| Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2011 | Rank | 500 | 15 | 1 | Overall rank on the Newsweek Global Green Ranking |
| Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2012 | Rank | 100 | 22 | 1 | |
| Ceres Climate & Energy Resolutions 2012 | Rating | withdrawn | Withdrawn; Company will address | filed | |
| Climate Counts 2011 | Reduce | 0 | 43 | 48 | How much has the company done to REDUCE its climate impact? |
| Climate Counts 2012 | Reduce | 0 | 45 | 10 | |
| UN Global Compact 2011 | references_anti_corruption | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| UN Global Compact 2012 | references_anti_corruption | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| UN Global Compact 2011 | references_environment | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| UN Global Compact 2012 | references_environment | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| UN Global Compact 2011 | references_human_rights | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| UN Global Compact 2012 | references_human_rights | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| UN Global Compact 2011 | references_labour | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| UN Global Compact 2012 | references_labour | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Global Reporting Initiative 2011 | Region | | Northern America | | Region the organization operates in. |
| Global Reporting Initiative 2012 | Region | | Northern America | | |
| ISOS Group Sustainability Reporting Assessments | Reliability | 0.33 | 1.87 | 2.00 | Information and processes used in the
preparation of a report should be gathered, recorded,
compiled, analyzed, and disclosed in a way that could be
subject to examination and that establishes the quality
and materiality of the information |
| Climate Counts 2011 | Report | 0 | 11 | 12 | How clearly and comprehensively does the company publicly DISCLOSE its climate protection efforts? |
| Climate Counts 2012 | Report | 0 | 11 | 10 | |
| Global Reporting Initiative 2011 | Report Html Address | | Not app. | | URL of the report location. |
| Global Reporting Initiative 2012 | Report Html Address | | [link] | | |
| [+] Global Reporting Initiative 2011 | Click here to see the 2 items available from this source. |
| Global Reporting Initiative 2012 | Report Pdf Address | | [link] | | |
| Global Reporting Initiative 2011 | Report reference IFC Performance Standards? | No | No | Yes | |
| Global Reporting Initiative 2012 | Report reference IFC Performance Standards? | | No | | |
| Global Reporting Initiative 2011 | Report reference ISO Standards? | No | No | Yes | |
| Global Reporting Initiative 2012 | Report reference ISO Standards? | | No | | |
| Global Reporting Initiative 2011 | Report Title | | Global Citizenship Report 2010 | | Title of the report. |
| Global Reporting Initiative 2012 | Report Title | | Corporate Social Responsibility | | |
| [+] Environmental Investment Organisation | Click here to see the 3 items available from this source. |
| Climate Counts 2011 | Review | 0 | 20 | 22 | How well does the company MEASURE its climate "footprint"? |
| Climate Counts 2012 | Review | 0 | 20 | 10 | |
| Brand Finance 2012 | Reviewed ? | | No response | | |
| [+] Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | Click here to see the 7 items available from this source. |
| [+] SA 8000 | Click here to see the 2 items available from this source. |
| [+] Environmental Investment Organisation | Click here to see the 4 items available from this source. |
| Climate Counts 2011 | Scorecard Level | 2 | 4 | 4 | Overall score |
| Brand Finance 2012 | Sector | | Energy | | |
| Brand Finance 2013 | Sector | | Energy | | |
| Ceres Climate & Energy Resolutions 2012 | Sector | | Electronics | | |
| Global Reporting Initiative 2011 | Sector | | Computers | | Industry sector. |
| Global Reporting Initiative 2012 | Sector | | Computers | | |
| Global Reporting Initiative 2011 | Sector Supplements (Final) | | Not Applicable | | This field indicates if the reporting organization has made use of one of the final Sector Supplements and which one. If ‘not used’ is indicated, it means that one of the final Sector Supplements is applicable, but has not been used. If ‘not applicable’ i |
| Global Reporting Initiative 2012 | Sector Supplements (Final) | | Food Processing | | |
| SIPRI--Stockhold International Peace Research Institute | SIPRI Top 100 Arms Producers | | Yes | Yes | |
| Global Reporting Initiative 2011 | Size | | Large | | GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl |
| Global Reporting Initiative 2012 | Size | | Large | | |
| ISOS Group Sustainability Reporting Assessments | Stakeholder Inclusiveness | 0.30 | 2.00 | 2.00 | The reporting organization should identify
its stakeholders and explain in the report how it has
responded to their reasonable expectations and interests. |
| UN Global Compact 2011 | starts_on | | 38656 | | |
| UN Global Compact 2012 | starts_on | | 39021 | | |
| Global Reporting Initiative 2011 | Status | Self-declared | Self-declared | Third-party-checked | For each G3 Application Level declared, the following statuses can be added:
• Self-declared
• Third-party-checked
• GRI-checked
Each reporter should declare an Application Level for their reporting. The reporter then has the option to have the Applicatio |
| Global Reporting Initiative 2012 | Status | Self-declared | Self-declared | Third-party-checked | For each G3 Application Level declared, the following statuses can be added:
• Self-declared
• Third-party-checked
• GRI-checked
Each reporter should declare an Application Level for their reporting. The reporter then has the option to have the Applicatio |
| World Economic Forum Members | Strategic Partners | | Yes | Yes | Strategic Partners comprise some of the world’s leading corporate citizens and provide essential leadership in support of the Forum’s mission. Strategic Partners are a key force in our activities and communities at the global, regional and industry levels. They help shape our initiatives, projects and task forces and give intellectual guidance through the participation of their most senior executives on steering boards and in advisory groups. Their considerable financial support and in-kind services – including the provision of dedicated staff to assist with our operations – allow the Forum to deliver its programmes and advance worldwide economic and social progress. |
| [+] Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | Click here to see the 3 items available from this source. |
| [+] CDP Water Data 2010 | Click here to see the 4 items available from this source. |
| NAFE Top 50-2012 | Supports and promotes woman employees | | Yes | Yes | Each organization completed a detailed application covering both internal and
external programs and activities that benefit women. |
| ISOS Group Sustainability Reporting Assessments | Sustainability Context | 0.88 | 2.00 | 2.00 | The report should present the organization’s
performance in the wider context of sustainability |
| World Economic Forum Members | Technology Pioneers | | Not app. | Yes | Technology Pioneers are companies that are involved in the development of life-changing technology innovations and have the potential for a long-term impact on business and society. |
| ISOS Group Sustainability Reporting Assessments | Timeliness | 0.76 | 2.00 | 2.00 | Reporting occurs on a regular schedule and
information is available in time for stakeholders to make
informed decisions. |
| UN Global Compact 2011 | title | | 2011 Communication on Progress | | |
| UN Global Compact 2012 | title | | 2011 Global Citizenship Report | | |
| Top 100 Diversity Supplier Programs for Hispanics | Top 100 Diversity Supplier Programs | | Yes | Yes | The top 100 suppliers selected by Hispanic Network Magazine's comprehensive study of each program and policies to include the development of disadvantaged business owner partnerships and the procurement process. |
| Top 100 Military Friendly Employers 2012 | Top 100 Military Friendly Employers 2012 by G.I. Jobs Magazine | 100 | 18 | 1 | |
| Top 50 Socially Responsible 2012 | Top 50 Socially Responsible 2012 | | yes | yes | |
| [+] Transparency International | Click here to see the 2 items available from this source. |
| [+] Goodness 500 2012 | Click here to see the 2 items available from this source. |
| UN Office on Drugs and Crime Anti-Corruption Measures | United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime Anti-Corruption Measures | No | Yes | Yes | Information on which Fortune Global 500 companies have and don't have anti-corruption policiestheir business practices and use the assessment to better develop and integrate their CR agenda. |
| UN Global Compact 2011 | updated_at | | 39213.781782 | | |
| UN Global Compact 2012 | updated_at | | 39633.872326 | | |
| CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2011 | Weighted
Average
Score | 176.5 | 70.8 | 46.2 | |
| Working Mother List 2010 | Working Mother list 2010 | | Yes | Yes | Working Mother Magazine's rating of the 100 best companies in terms of benefits for working mothers |
| Working Mother List 2011 | Working Mother list 2011 | | Yes | Yes | Working Mother Magazine's rating of the 100 best companies in terms of benefits for working mothers |
