CSRHub is the world’s largest CSR (corporate social responsibility) and sustainability ratings and information database.

We are a leading global manufacturer and marketer of consumer food and chemical products.

Ticker: CLX ISIN: US1890541097
Address: 1221 Broadway , USA , Oakland , CA , 94612-1888 Website: The Clorox Company
Phone #: 1-510-2717000 CSR Web Area: SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Basic Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Ratings

  Overall Community Employees Environment Governance
The Clorox Company 64 59 65 68 63
Wholesale Trade
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
All company average 55 55 56 58 52
USA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Percentile Rankings

Rankings are in percentile terms, compared to other companies in the same industry and country Overall Community Employees Environment Governance
The Clorox Company 92% 67% 79% 83% 83%
Wholesale Trade
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
USA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Ratings History

Only subscribers can interact with the graph.

More CSR Rating Details

  Community Employees
Community Dev & Philanthropy Product Human Rights & Supply Chain Compensation & Benefits Diversity & Labor Rights Training, Health & Safety
The Clorox Company
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Wholesale Trade
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
All company average 53 54 55 58 55 55
USA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Environment Governance
Energy & Climate Change Environmant Policy & Reporting Resource Management Board Leadership Ethics Transparency & Reporting
The Clorox Company
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Wholesale Trade
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
All company average 57 58 57 50 55 51
USA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Percentile rankings

Rankings are in percentile terms, compared to other companies in the same industry and country Community Employees
Community Dev & Philantrophy Product Human Rights & Supply Chain Compensation & Benefits Diversity & Labor Rights Training, Health & Safety
The Clorox Company 75% 73% 45% 90% 51% 82%
Wholesale Trade
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
USA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Environment Governance
Energy & Climate Change Environment Policy & Reporting Resource Management Board Leadership Ethics Transparency & Reporting
The Clorox Company 82% 80% 87% 75% 84% 84%
Wholesale Trade
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
USA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

4 Special Issues Affect This Company (see a list of issues here)

Military Contractor Gay & Lesbian Sensitive Diverse Board Animal Test User
# of Sources 1 1 3 5
# of co. % of co. # of co. % of co. # of co. % of co. # of co. % of co.
Wholesale Trade
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Overall database 756 8.1 266 2.8 111 1.2 115 1.2
USA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

CSRHub Has 72 Data Sources (46 Are Currently Active) for This Company

= sources impacting the current ratings
= sources not impacting the current ratings, but included in earlier ratings for this company
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Original Data Values

(unsubscribed users can see the list, subscribers can see the data details for most sources)

Data source name

Data source element name Minimum value Value provided by datasource Maximum value Data description
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Resolution Status Dialogue Status of the company's multiple shareholder resolutions.
Resolution Summary As You Sow engaged in dialogue with Clorox, pressing the company to adopt extended producer responsibility policies to help minimize waste from consumer packaging.(…) Individual resolution summary page
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Brand Value / Enterprise Value (%) -48.164682123 0.0751 316.6056 NA
Brand Value 2012 833.3661 NA
BSI 50 64.3691 88.4717 NA
Domicile UNITED STATES NA
Enterprise Value NA 11095.59 NA NA
Reviewed ? No response NA
Sector Consumer, Non-cyclical NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Proxy filed No NA
Proxy voting decisions for the company NA NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Proxy voting decisions for the company NA NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Percent of brands that use animal testing 100 0.9286 0 NA
List of companies that test on animals Yes No No NA
Number of brands that don't use animal testing 0 1 11 NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
0. Further Information NA NA NA NA
0.1. Introduction - Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. NA The Clorox Company is a leading manufacturer and marketer of consumer products with 8,100 employees and fiscal year 2011 revenues of $5.5 billion. Clorox markets some of consumers' most trusted and recognized brand names, including its namesake bleach and NA NA
5.1e Identified climate change risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments? NA Yes NA NA
5.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA The below text refers to all 3 other climate related risks detailed in the question above (O-1 through O-3). The Clorox Company is exposed to regulatory, physical and other risks related to climate change. Clorox has enterprise risk management processes t NA NA
5.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
5.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
5.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
6. Attachments NA NA NA NA
6. Further Information NA NA NA NA
6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Opportunities driven by changes in regulation; Opportunities driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA NA
6.1a Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in regulation? NA Yes NA NA
6.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA The text below refers to all three opportunities stated above (R-1, R-2 and R-3). We do believe that increased regulation can present the following opportunities to our company: •Regulation on increasing the efficiency of energy / fuel use could lead to t NA NA
6.1c Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in physical climate parameters? NA Yes NA NA
14. Attachments NA NA NA NA
6.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA The text below refers to both opportunities stated above (P-1 and P-2). Reducing water consumption includes both concentrating our liquid bleach and certain cleaner products, and reducing the amount of process water we use. Process water reduction is driv NA NA
6.1e Identified opportunities that are driven by changes in other climate-related developments? NA Yes NA NA
6.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA The text below refers to all three opportunities stated above (O-1, O-2 and O-3). Current and future financial effects of investment in opportunities are assessed and evaluated as is any other business investment and communicated in traditional means to o NA NA
13. Attachments NA NA NA NA
11. Attachments NA NA NA NA
11. Further Information NA NA NA NA
11.1. Do you consider that the grid average factors used to report Scope 2 emissions in Question 8.3 reflect the contractual arrangements you have with electricity suppliers? NA Yes NA NA
11.1a. You may report a total contractual Scope 2 figure in response to this question. Please provide your total global contractual Scope 2 GHG emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 0 NA 17902000 NA
11.2. Has your organization retired any certificates, e.g. Renewable Energy Certificates, associated with zero or low carbon electricity within the reporting year or has this been done on your behalf? NA Yes NA NA
3.1e. Please explain (i) why not; and (ii) forecast how your emissions will change over the next five years NA NA NA NA
3.2. Does the use of your goods and/or services directly enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party? No Yes Yes NA
3.2a. Please provide details (see guidance) NA The following Clorox products enable GHG emissions to be avoided by third parties: 1.Brita® Water Filtration: Brita offers water filtration through Brita® pitchers and faucet filtration systems, and the Brita Bottle. The use of water filters provides an a NA NA
3.3c Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities. 0 5 12 NA
3.3c. What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities? NA Compliance with regulatory requirements/standards, Dedicated budget for energy efficiency, Dedicated budget for other emission reduction activities, Employee engagement, Internal incentives/recognition programs NA NA
5. Attachments NA NA NA NA
5. Further Information NA NA NA NA
5.1. Have you identified any climate change risks (current or future) that have potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Risks driven by changes in regulation; Risks driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA NA
5.1a Identified risks driven by changes in regulation? NA NA NA NA
5.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA The below text refers to all 7 regulatory risks detailed in the question above (R-1 through R-7). The Clorox Company could be exposed to regulatory, physical and other risks related to climate change. Clorox has enterprise risk management processes to ide NA NA
14. Further Information NA NA NA NA
1.1. Where is the highest level of direct responsibility for climate change within your company? No individual or committee with overall responsibility for climate change Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board NA
1.1a. Please identify the position of the individual or name of the committee with this responsibility NA At The Clorox Company (Clorox or the Company), we take issues related to Climate Change and Greenhouse Gas emissions very seriously. Environmental sustainability, including climate change, is an integral part of our overall Corporate Business Strategy. Th NA NA
1.2. Do you provide incentives for the management of climate change issues, including the attainment of targets? No Yes Yes NA
13. Further Information NA NA NA NA
13.1. How do your absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year compare to the previous year? Increased Increased Decreased NA
13.1a (i) If absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) have increased, decreased or remained the same overall compared to the previous year, state direction of change NA Slightly Increased NA NA
13.1a (ii) If absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) have increased, decreased or remained the same overall compared to the previous year, state the reason for the direction of change NA Increase: Emissions reduction activities, Increase: Change in physical operating conditions NA NA
13.1a (iii) If emissions have increased, decreased or remained the same overall, provide the emissions value (%) NA Decrease: , Increase: 2 , Emission value for which direction is not stated: NA NA
2012 Score 0 87 100 NA
2012 Performance Band E B A NA
2.3a. Please explain (i) the engagement process and (ii) actions you are advocating NA The Clorox Company believes that rising GHG emissions have a significant impact on climate change and the environment. Clorox therefore supports congressional action on comprehensive national climate change legislation aimed at reducing aggregate emission NA NA
8.8. Are carbon dioxide emissions from the combustion of biologically sequestered carbon (i.e. carbon dioxide emissions from burning biomass/biofuels) relevant to your company? No Yes Yes NA
8.8a. Please provide the emissions in metric tonnes CO2e 0.01 875062 27263000 NA
Management 4. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/07/3507/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/4.Communication/supplier_codeconduct.pdf NA NA
Management 4. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? NA 6 NA NA
5.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA The below text refers to all 5 physical climate change risks detailed in the question above (P-1 through P-5). The Clorox Company is exposed to regulatory, physical and other risks related to climate change. Clorox has enterprise risk management processes NA NA
2. Attachments NA NA NA NA
2. Further Information NA NA NA NA
5.1c Identified climate change risks driven by change in physical climate parameters? NA Yes NA NA
2.1. Please select the option that best describes your risk management procedures with regard to climate change risks and opportunities NA Integrated into multi-disciplinary company wide risk management processes NA NA
2.1a. Please provide further details (see guidance) NA Clorox has a comprehensive enterprise risk management process to identify, assess and prioritize business risks. The process includes identifying risks, assessing exposures and quantifying the value at risk to the company. The evaluation considers level o NA NA
2.2. Is climate change integrated into your business strategy? No Yes Yes NA
2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes (see guidance) NA The Clorox Company believes that rising GHG emissions have a significant impact on climate change and the environment. Clorox is also committed to doing its part to help address this issue. Clorox annually reports its greenhouse gas emissions, and has set NA NA
2.2b. Please explain why not NA NA NA NA
2.3. Do you engage with policy makers to encourage further action on mitigation and/or adaptation? No Yes Yes NA
3. Attachments NA NA NA NA
3. Further Information NA NA NA NA
3.1. Did you have an emissions reduction target that was active (ongoing or reached completion) in the reporting year? No Intensity target Absolute and intensity targets NA
14.1. Do you participate in any emission trading schemes? No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next two years No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next two years Yes NA
14.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? No Yes Yes NA
6.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
6.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
6.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
7. Attachments NA NA NA NA
7. Further Information NA NA NA NA
7.1. Please provide your base year and base year emissions (Scopes 1 and 2) NA NA NA NA
0.4. Currency selection Please select the currency in which you would like to submit your response. All financial information contained in the response should be in this currency. NA USD($) NA NA
1. Attachments NA NA NA NA
1. Further Information NA NA NA NA
8.7. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 2 emissions More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% NA More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% NA
11.1b. Explain the basis of the alternative figure (see guidance) NA NA
14.1b. What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? NA NA
8.1. Please select the boundary you are using for your Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas inventory NA NA NA NA
8.2a. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 92 NA 231902967 NA
8.3a. Please provide your gross global Scope 2 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 293 NA 8071070 NA
8.4. Are there are any sources (e.g. facilities, specific GHGs, activities, geographies, etc.) of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions which are not included in your disclosure? NA No NA NA
8.6. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 1 emissions More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% NA More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
8.7. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 2 emissions Third party verification or assurance complete Proportion of Scope 2 emissions that are verified/assured for 2011-2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.7a. Please indicate the proportion of your Scope 2 emissions that are verified/assured More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% More than 80% but less than or equal to 90% More than 90% but less than or equal to 100%
8.7b Reporting Period From/To/Please provide further details of the verification/assurance undertaken, and attach the relevant statements/Type of verification or assurance/Relevant standard/Attach the document No Response
8.8. Are carbon dioxide emissions from biologically sequestered carbon relevant to your organization? Yes
8.8a. Please provide the emissions in metric tonnes CO2 926907
8.8a. Please provide the emissions in metric tonnes CO2e 0.05 926907 13638000
9.1. Do you have Scope 1 emissions sources in more than one country? Yes
9.1a Reporting Period From/To/Please complete the table below: Country/Region/Scope 1 metric tonnes CO2e 1 Jan 2012/31 Dec 2012/United States of America/62674
9.2. Please indicate which other Scope 1 emissions breakdowns you are able to provide (tick all that apply) NA By business division; By GHG type NA
9.2a Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by business division: Business division/Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) 1 Jan 2012/31 Dec 2012/Cleaning (Laundry, Home Care, Away From Home)/5361
9.2b Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by facility: Facility/Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) No Response
9.2c Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by GHG type: GHG type/Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) 1 Jan 2012/31 Dec 2012/CO2/63214
9.2d Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by activity: Activity/Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) No Response
9.2e Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by legal structure: Legal structure/Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) No Response
0.3. Country list configuration Malaysia
0.4. Currency selection Please select the currency in which you would like to submit your response. All financial information contained in the response should be in this currency. USD($)
0.4. Please select the currency in which you would like to submit your response. USD($)
0.5. Please select if you wish to complete a shorter information request. NA
0.6. Modules NA As part of the Investor CDP information request, electric utilities, companies with electric utility activities or assets, companies in the automobile or auto component manufacture sectors and companies in the oil and gas industry should complete suppleme
1. Attachments NA NA NA
1. Further Information NA NA NA
1.1. Where is the highest level of direct responsibility for climate change within your company? No individual or committee with overall responsibility for climate change Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board
1.1a. Please identify the position of the individual or name of the committee with this responsibility NA At The Clorox Company (Clorox or the Company), we take issues related to Climate Change and Greenhouse Gas emissions very seriously. Environmental sustainability, including climate change, is an integral part of our overall Corporate Business Strategy. Th NA
1.2. Do you provide incentives for the management of climate change issues, including the attainment of targets? No Yes Yes
1.2a. Who is entitled to benefit from these incentives? Corporate executive team/Monetary reward/Accountable for the execution of Clorox’s corporate scorecard, including GHG reductions. Part of the Executive Committee’s variable incentive package is contingent on Clorox meeting its annual environmental footpri
10.1. Do you have Scope 2 emissions sources in more than one country? Yes
10.1a Reporting Period: From/To/Please complete the table below: Country/Region/Scope 2 metric tonnes CO2e/Purchased and consumed electricity, heat, steam or cooling (MWh)/Purchased and consumed low carbon electricity, heat, steam or cooling (MWh) 1 Jan 2012/31 Dec 2012/United States of America/219828/368899/0
10.2. Please indicate which other Scope 2 emissions breakdowns you are able to provide (tick all that apply) NA By business division NA
10.2a Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by business division: Business division/Scope 2 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) 1 Jan 2012/31 Dec 2012/Cleaning (Laundry, Home Care, Away From Home)/35157
10.2b Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by facility: Facility/Scope 2 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) No Response
10.2c Reporting Period: From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by activity: Activity/Scope 2 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) No Response
10.2d Reporting Period: From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by legal structure: Legal structure/Scope 2 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) No Response
11. Attachments NA NA NA
11. Further Information NA NA NA
11.1. What percentage of your total operational spend in the reporting year was on energy? More than 0% but less than or equal to 5% More than 5% but less than or equal to 10% More than 95% but less than or equal to 100%
11.2. Please state how much fuel, electricity, heat, steam, and cooling in MWh your organization has purchased and consumed during the reporting year: Energy type/MWh Fuel/234165;Electricity/477413;Heat/0;Steam/0;Cooling/0
11.3. Please complete the table by breaking down the total "Fuel" figure entered above by fuel type: Fuels/MWh Natural gas/163845
11.4. Please provide details of the electricity, heat, steam or cooling amounts that were accounted at a low carbon emission factor: Basis for applying a low carbon emission factor/MWh associated with low carbon electricity, heat, steam or cooling Grid connected low carbon electricity generation owned by company, no instruments created/143000
12. Attachments NA
12. Further Information NA
12.1. How do your absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year compare to the previous year? Decreased
12.1a Reason of change Emissions reduction activities, Divestment, Acquisitions, Mergers, Change in output, Change in methodology, Change in boundary, Change in physical operating conditions, Unidentified, Other
12.1a. Reason: Emissions value (percentage) Emissions reduction activities: 8.1/Acquisitions: 0.6/Change in methodology: 1.7/Change in boundary: 0/Change in physical operating conditions: 7.2/
12.2. Please describe your gross combined Scope 1 and 2 emissions for the reporting year in metric tonnes CO2e per revenue: Intensity figure/Metric numerator/% change from previous year/Direction of change from previous year/Reason for change 59.17/metric tonnes CO2e/10/Decrease/Numerator = Total Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions in Metric Tons of CO2 equivalent = 325,454 Denominator = Revenue (in $ Millions). Total Revenue for 2012 = $ 5500 Million.
12.3. Please describe your gross combined Scope 1 and 2 emissions for the reporting year in metric tonnes CO2e per FTE: Intensity figure/Metric numerator/% change from previous year/Direction of change from previous year/Reason for change 39.21/metric tonnes CO2e/10/Decrease/Numerator = Total Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions in Metric Tons of CO2 equivalent = 325,454 Denominator = Number of employees in 2012 = 8300 globally.
12.4. Please provide an additional intensity (normalized) metric that is appropriate to your business operations: Intensity figure/Metric numerator/% change from previous year/Direction of change from previous year/Reason for change 742.71/metric tonnes CO2e/9.5/Decrease/Numerator = Total Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions in Metric Tons of CO2 equivalent = 325,454 Denominator = Number of units (cases) of product sold (in millions) in 2012 = 438.2 Million Stat Cases
13.1. Do you participate in any emissions trading schemes? No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next 2 years
13.1b. What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? NA
13.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? Yes
14. Attachments NA NA NA
14. Further Information NA NA NA
14.1. Do you participate in any emission trading schemes? No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next two years No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next 2 years Yes
14.1b. What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? NA
14.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? No Yes Yes
14.2. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 3 emissions No third party verification or assurance
14.2a. Please indicate the proportion of your Scope 3 emissions that are verified/assured NA
14.3. Are you able to compare your Scope 3 emissions for the reporting year with those for the previous year for any sources? Yes
14.4. Do you engage with any of the elements of your value chain on GHG emissions and climate change strategies? (Tick all that apply) Yes, our suppliers; Yes, our customers
14.4a. Please give details of methods of engagement, your strategy for prioritizing engagements and measures of success We have currently put together a process for engaging our top tier suppliers in several focus areas. We are currently on track to work with approximately 70% of our largest suppliers (which would roughly translate to our top 100 suppliers). We have put
14.4d. Please explain why not and any plans you have to develop an engagement strategy in the future NA
2. Attachments NA NA NA
2. Further Information NA NA NA
2.1. Please select the option that best describes your risk management procedures with regard to climate change risks and opportunities NA Integrated into multi-disciplinary company wide risk management processes NA
2.1a. Please provide further details Clorox has a comprehensive enterprise risk management process to identify, assess and prioritize business risks. The process includes identifying risks, assessing exposures and quantifying the value at risk to the company. The evaluation considers level
2.1a. Please provide further details (see guidance) NA Clorox has a comprehensive enterprise risk management process to identify, assess and prioritize business risks. The process includes identifying risks, assessing exposures and quantifying the value at risk to the company. The evaluation considers level NA
2.2. Is climate change integrated into your business strategy? No Yes Yes
2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes The Clorox Company believes that rising GHG emissions have a significant impact on climate change and the environment. Clorox is also committed to doing its part to help address this issue. Clorox annually reports its greenhouse gas emissions, and has s
2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes (see guidance) NA The Clorox Company believes that rising GHG emissions have a significant impact on climate change and the environment. Clorox is also committed to doing its part to help address this issue. Clorox annually reports its greenhouse gas emissions, and has s NA
2.2b. Please explain why not NA NA NA
2.3. Do you engage in activities that could either directly or indirectly influence policy on climate change through any of the following? (tick all that apply) Yes
2.3. Do you engage with policy makers to encourage further action on mitigation and/or adaptation? No Yes Yes
2.3a. On what issues have you been engaging directly?: Focus of legislation/Corporate Position/Details of engagement/Proposed solution NA
2.3a. Please explain (i) the engagement process and (ii) actions you are advocating NA NA NA
2.3b. Are you on the Board of any trade associations or provide funding beyond membership? Yes
2.3c. Please enter the details of those trade associations that are likely to take a position on climate change legislation/Trade association GMA (Grocery Manufacturer's Association)/Consistent/The GMA believes that continued GHG emissions contribute to climate change. They have urged the US Senate to craft legislation to address these challenges./As a member organization, we actively particip
2.3d. Do you publically disclose a list of all the research organizations that you fund? Yes
2.3e. Do you fund any research organizations to produce public work on climate change? No
2.3f. Please describe the work and how it aligns with your own strategy on climate change NA
2.3g. Please provide details of the other engagement activities that you undertake Clorox works closely with a number of research organizations, non-profit associations, agencies and consortiums to further environmental sustainability initiatives within our company, industries and communities. Some of these are: •The Sustainability Co
2.3h. What processes do you have in place to ensure that all of your direct and indirect activities that influence policy are consistent with your overall climate change strategy? We have a Government Affairs and a Regulatory Affairs group that routinely work closely with the Environmental Sustainability group (led by the VP of Environmental Sustainability) on matters related to climate change policy. We follow a consultative proc
2.3i. Please explain why you do not engage with policy makers NA
3. Attachments NA NA NA
3. Further Information NA NA NA
3.1. Did you have an emissions reduction target that was active (ongoing or reached completion) in the reporting year? No Intensity target Absolute and intensity targets
3.1a. Absolute target/ID/Scope/% of emissions in scope/% reduction from base year/Base year/Base year emissions (metric tonnes CO2e)/Target year/Comment No Response
3.1b. Intensity target/ID/Scope/% of emissions in scope/% reduction from base year/Metric/Base year/Normalized base year emissions/Target year/Comment A1/Scope 1+2+3/100/16/metric tonnes CO2e per unit of production/2007/589224/2013/We had a public goal to reduce our global GHG emissions (Scope 1, 2 & 3) by 10% per case of product sold from 2007 (baseline year) to 2013 (target year). This measurement
3.1c. What change in absolute emissions this intensity target reflects/ID/Direction of change anticipated in absolute Scope 1+2 emissions at target completion?/% change anticipated in absolute Scope 1+2 emissions B1/Decrease/10/Decrease/10/We had a public goal to reduce our global GHG emissions (Scope 1, 2 & 3) by 10% per case of product sold from 2007 (baseline year) to 2013 (target year). Four years into this six year goal period, we had already exceeded thi
3.1d. Please provide details on your progress against this target made in the reporting year/ID/% complete (time)/% complete (emissions)/Comment C1/100/100/We exceeded our first GHG emission target, reducing our GHG emissions by 16.5% from 2007 to 2011. We closed our first goal period early (end of goal period was 2011). This reduction was vs. a 10% GHG reduction goal.
3.1e. Please explain (i) why not; and (ii) forecast how your emissions will change over the next five years NA NA NA
3.2. Does the use of your goods and/or services directly enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party? No Yes Yes
3.2a. Please provide details (see guidance) NA 1. Concentrated Liquid Bleach - In 2012, our namesake Clorox Bleach product converted to a 33 percent more concentrated formula. This has helped reduce the overall carbon footprint associated with the lifecycle consumption of bleach. The end product is NA
3.3. Did you have emissions reduction initiatives that were active within the reporting year (this can include those in the planning and/or implementation phases) No Yes Yes
3.3a. Please identify the total number of projects at each stage of development, and for those in theimplementation stages, the estimated CO2e savings/Stage of development/3.3a. Number of projects/Total estimated annual CO2e savings in metric tonnes CO2e Under investigation//
3.3c Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities. 0 5 13 Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities.
3.3c. What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities? NA Compliance with regulatory requirements/standards, Dedicated budget for energy efficiency, Dedicated budget for energy efficiency, Employee engagement, Internal incentives/recognition programs NA
3.3c. What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities?/Comment Compliance with regulatory requirements/standards/These investments are budgeted as part of the company’s annual capital and expense budgeting processes.
4. Attachments https://www.cdproject.net/sites/2013/07/3507/Investor CDP 2013/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2013/4.Communication/Clorox_Annual_Report.pdf
4. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? - Further Information The Clorox Company believes that rising GHG emissions have a significant impact on climate change and the environment. Clorox therefore supports Congressional action on comprehensive national climate change legislation aimed at reducing aggregate emission
4.1. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? 3 The number of corporate annual reports and voluntary publications (complete and/or underway) made about the company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance
5. Attachments NA NA NA
5. Further Information NA NA NA
5.1. Have you identified any climate change risks (current or future) that have potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Risks driven by changes in regulation; Risks driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA
5.1a. Climate change risks driven by changes in regulation Yes
5.1a. Please describe your risks driven by changes in regulation /ID/Risk driver/ Description/Potential impact/Timeframe/Direct/Indirect/Likelihood/Magnitude of impact R-1/International agreements/Internationally binding agreements and any new internationally recognized protocols on Climate Change that impact Clorox facilities could have an impact on Clorox operations, particularly the cost involved in complying with th
5.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk and (iii) the costs associated with these actions The below text refers to all 7 regulatory risks detailed in the question above (R-1 through R-7). The Clorox Company could be exposed to regulatory, physical and other risks related to climate change. Clorox has enterprise risk management processes to ide
5.1c. Climate change risks driven by change in physical climate parameters Yes
5.1c. Please describe your risks that are driven by change in physical climate parameters/ID/Risk driver/Description/Potential impact/Timeframe/Direct/Indirect/Likelihood/Magnitude of impact P-1/Change in mean (average) temperature/Changes in temperature patterns (an increase in the average temperature on earth owing to climate change) are expected to occur in the future due to climate change, and such changes are expected to cause extremes i
5.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA The below text refers to all 5 physical climate change risks detailed in the question above (P-1 through P-5). The Clorox Company is exposed to regulatory, physical and other risks related to climate change. Clorox has enterprise risk management processes NA
5.1e. Please describe your risks that are driven by changes in other climate-related developments/ID/Risk driver/Description/Potential impact/Timeframe/Direct/Indirect/Likelihood/Magnitude of impact 2D/Tropical cyclones (hurricanes and typhoons)/WEG have sales office located in EUA that may be at risk of tropical cyclones (hurricanes and typhoons)/Reduction/disruption in production capacity/Current/Direct/About as likely as not/Low
5.1e.Climate change risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments Yes
5.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA The below text refers to all 3 other climate related risks detailed in the question above (O-1 through O-3). The Clorox Company is exposed to regulatory, physical and other risks related to climate change. Clorox has enterprise risk management processes t NA
5.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
5.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
5.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
6. Attachments NA NA NA
6. Further Information NA NA NA
6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Opportunities driven by changes in regulation; Opportunities driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA
6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? -Transparency Yes
6.1a Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in regulation? NA Yes NA
6.1a. Please describe your opportunities that are driven by changes in regulation/ID/Opportunity driver/Description/Potential impact/Timeframe/Direct/Indirect/Likelihood/Magnitude of impact R-1/Air pollution limits/No Clorox facility in the U.S. currently has reportable, direct greenhouse gas emissions above the current 25,000 MTCE mandatory reporting threshold, or any air pollutants emissions above the prescribed state or federal limits. As
6.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity and (iii) the costs associated with these actions The text below refers to all three opportunities stated above (R-1, R-2 and R-3). We do believe that increased regulation can present the following opportunities to our company: •Regulation on increasing the efficiency of energy / fuel use could lead to t
6.1c. Please describe the opportunities that are driven by changes in physical climate parameters Yes
6.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity and (iii) the costs associated with these actions The text below refers to both opportunities stated above (P-1 and P-2). Reducing water consumption includes both concentrating our liquid bleach and certain cleaner products, and reducing the amount of process water we use. Process water reduction is driv
6.1e. Please describe the opportunities that are driven by changes in other climate-related developments Yes
6.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA The text below refers to all three opportunities stated above (O-1, O-2 and O-3). Current and future financial effects of investment in opportunities are assessed and evaluated as is any other business investment and communicated in traditional means to o NA
6.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
6.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
6.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
7. Attachments NA NA NA
7. Further Information NA NA NA
7.1. Please provide your base year and base year emissions (Scopes 1 and 2)/7.1. Base year From Date:/To Date:/ Scope 1 Base year emissions (metric tonnes CO2e)/N39Scope 2 Base year emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) 2005-01-01/2005-12-31/67774/316192
7.2. Please give the name of the standard, protocol or methodology you have used to collect activity data and calculate Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions NA The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (Revised Edition)/Other NA
7.3. Please give the source for the global warming potentials you have used Gas/Reference CO2/IPCC Second Assessment Report (SAR - 100 year)
7.4. Please give the emissions factors you have applied and their origin; alternatively, please attach an Excel spreadsheet with this data Fuel/Material/Energy/Emission Factor/Unit/Reference Distillate fuel oil No 1/73.96/Other: metric tons CO2/ Billion BTU/40 CFR Part 98 Table C-1
8.1. Please select the boundary you are using for your Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas inventory NA Operational control NA Boundary used for Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas inventory during 2011-2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.2. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e NA Gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e for 2011 - 2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.2. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figures in metric tonnes CO2e 69481
8.3. Please provide your gross global Scope 2 emissions figures in metric tonnes CO2e NA
8.4. Are there are any sources (e.g. facilities, specific GHGs, activities, geographies, etc.) of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions which are not included in your disclosure? NA No NA Proportion of Scope 1 emissions that are verified/assured for 2011 - 2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.4a Reporting Period From/To/Source/Scope/Explain why the source is excluded No Response
8.5 Reporting Period From/To/Please estimate the uncertainty of the total gross global Scope 1 and 2 emissions figures that you have supplied and specify the sources of uncertainty in your data gathering, handling and calculations/Scope 1 emissions No Response
8.6. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 1 emissions Third party verification or assurance complete Proportion of Scope 1 emissions that are verified/assured for 2011 - 2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.6a. Please indicate the proportion of your Scope 1 emissions that are verified/assured More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% More than 60% but less than or equal to 80% More than 90% but less than or equal to 100%
8.6b Reporting Period From/To/Please provide further details of the verification/assurance undertaken, and attach the relevant statements: Type of verification or assurance/Attach the document No Response
2013 Performance Band E B A NA
2013 Score 0 82 100 NA
0. Attachments NA NA NA If you have not been presented with a sector module that you consider would be appropriate for your company to answer, please select the module below. If you wish to view the questions first, please see https://www.cdproject.net/en-US/Programmes/Pages/Mor
0. Further Information NA NA NA If you are in these sectors (according to the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS)), the corresponding sector modules will be marked as default options to your information request. If you want to query your classification, please email respond@c
0.1. Introduction - Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. NA The Clorox Company is a leading multinational manufacturer and marketer of consumer and professional products with approximately 8,400 employees and fiscal year 2012 revenues of $5.5 billion. Clorox markets some of the most trusted and recognized brand na NA
0.1. Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. The Clorox Company is a leading multinational manufacturer and marketer of consumer and professional products with approximately 8,400 employees and fiscal year 2012 revenues of $5.5 billion. Clorox markets some of the most trusted and recognized brand na
0.2. Please state the start and end date of the year for which you are reporting data. 2012-01-01
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
2014 Performance Band E B A 2014 Performance Band
2014 Score 100 84 1 2014 Score
CDLI leader No No Yes The Climate Disclosure Leadership Index: A Company must: (1)   Make its response public and submit via CDP’s Online Response System (2) Achieve a score within the top 10% of the total regional sample population
Comment ŒŽ Comment
CPLI leader No No Yes The Climate Performance Leadership Inde: A company must: (1)Make its response public and submit via CDP’s Online Response System (2) Attain a performance score greater than (3) Disclose gross global Scope 1 and Scope 2 figures (4) Score maximum performanc
Scope 1 emissions 73740 All greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions that are directly from sources that are owned or controlled by the reporting entity.
Scope 2 emissions 242641 All indirect greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the consumption of purchased electricity, heat or steam. Indirect GHG emissions are a consequence of the activities of the reporting entity, but occur at sources owned or controlled by another entity.
Target(s) reported abs int Absolute/Intensive
Ticker CLX Ticker
Verification/ assurance 123 Audit and verification by a competent and independent organization that uses a standardized set of terms and methods.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
2.1. Are you able to identify which of your operations are located in water-stressed regions? No Response 4 answers 4 answers NA
0.4. Exclusions Are there any geographies, activities, facilities or types of water inputs/outputs within this boundary which are not included in your disclosure? NA No NA NA
2.2b. You may explain here why you are not able to identify which of your operations are located in regions subject to water stress or water-related risk and whether you have plans to explore this issue in the future No Response 3 answers 3 answers NA
0.4aList of Exclusions & Reason for Exclusions-Transparency & Reporting No Response No Response Answered NA
1.1. Does your company have a water policy, strategy or management plan? No Yes Yes NA
2.1bPlease list the water-stressed regions where you have operations and the percentage of your total operations in that area NA United States of America/Southwest region (Facilities at Reno, NV and Los Angeles, CA)/1 – 10Rest of world/Central and South America (Facilities at Mexico City, Mexico and Lima, Peru)/1 – 10 NA NA
2.1bPlease list the water-stressed regions where you have operations and the percentage of your total operations in that area-Transparency & Reporting No Response 4 answers 4 answers NA
2.2. Do you use other indicators (besides water stress) to identify operations which are located in regions subject to water-related risk? NA NA NA NA
0.1. Introduction Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. NA The Clorox Company is a leading manufacturer and marketer of consumer products with 8,100 employees and fiscal year 2011 revenues of $5.5 billion. NA NA
0.2. Reporng Year Please state the start and end date of the year for which you are reporting data. 2.0. Enter the period that will be disclosed. NA 01-01-2011 - 31-12-2011 NA NA
0.3. Reporting Boundary Please indicate the category that describes the company, entities, or group for which you are reporting. NA Companies, entities or groups over which operational control is exercised. NA NA
2.3. Please specify the total percentage of your operations that are located in the regions at risk which you identified in questions 2.1 and/or 2.2 NA Yes NA NA
2.4. Please specify the basis you use to calculate the percentages used for questions 2.1 and/or 2.2 NA Other NA NA
1.1a. Please describe your policy, strategy or plan, including the highest level of responsibility for it within your company and its geographical reach-Transaprency & Reporting Australia/CCA's Water Policy covers all aspects of water related operations activities from both municipal and groundwater sources across the beverage and food businesses. Global/In 2007, Clorox set operational goals for reducing our global water footprint by 10% (on a per product sold basis) by 2013, our centennial year. To date, we have reduced our water consumption by 14% (on a per product sold basis). Water management United States of America/We have a philosophy to limit water waste and a strategy to identify reduction opportunities from development through operations through supply chain. We build our stores to green building standards (LEED and Green Globes), and e NA
1.1b. Does the policy, strategy or plan specify water reduction, quality or efficiency targets or other water-related goals? NA Global NA NA
1.1bDoes the water policy, strategy or plan specify water-related targets or goals? No Yes Yes NA
0.4aList of Exclusions & Reason for Exclusions NA NA NA NA
CDP Water Data 2013
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
0.2. Reporting Year 2012-01-01
0.3. Reporting Boundary Companies, entities or groups over which operational control is exercised
0.4. Are there any geographies, activities, facilities or types of water inputs/outputs within this boundary which are not included in your disclosure? No
0.4a. List of Exclusions & Reason for Exclusions-Transparency & Reporting NA
0.4a. List of Exclusions & Reason for Exclusions-Transparency & Reporting (value) NA
1.1. Does your company have a water policy, strategy or management plan? No Yes Yes
1.1a. Please describe your policy, strategy or plan, including the highest level of responsibility for it within your company and its geographical reach-Transaprency & Reporting Australia/CCA's Water Policy covers all aspects of water related operations activities from both municipal and groundwater sources across the beverage and food businesses. NA United States of America/We have a philosophy to limit water waste and a strategy to identify reduction opportunities from development through operations through supply chain. We build our stores to green building standards (LEED and Green Globes), and e
1.1a. Please describe your policy, strategy or plan, including the highest level of responsibility for it within your company and its geographical reach-Transaprency & Reporting (value) NA
1.1b. Does the water policy, strategy or plan specify water-related targets or goals? Yes
1.1c. Description of Target/goal, its type and geographical reach -Transparency & Reporting 2 answers
1.1c. Description of Target/goal, its type and geographical reach -Transparency & Reporting (value) #NAME?
1.1d. You may explain here why your company does not have a water policy, strategy or plan and if you intend to put one in place. NA
1.2. What specific actions has your company taken to manage water resources or engage stakeholders in water-related issues and what are their outcomes?-Transparency & Reporting 2 answers
1.2. What specific actions has your company taken to manage water resources or engage stakeholders in water-related issues and what are their outcomes?-Transparency & Reporting (value) #NAME?
2.1. Are any of your operations located in water-stressed regions? Yes
2.1a. Please specify the method(s) you use to characterize water-stressed regions- Environmental policy & Reporting Other
2.1a. Please specify the method(s) you use to characterize water-stressed regions- Environmental policy & Reporting (value) #NAME?
2.1b. Please list the water-stressed regions where you have operations and the percentage of your total operations in that area-Transparency & Reporting 2 answers
2.1b. Please list the water-stressed regions where you have operations and the percentage of your total operations in that area-Transparency & Reporting (value) #NAME?
2.2. Are there other indicators (besides water stress) which you wish to report that help you to identify which of your operations are located in regions subject to water-related risk? No
2.2a. Please list the relevant risk indicator of your total operations in that area-Environment Policy and Reporting NA
2.2b. You may explain here why you do not wish to report or why you do not use other indicators to identify which of your operations are located in regions subject to water-related risk. Our water stressed regions and the criteria we use to classify them as water-stressed regions are described in our responses to questions 2.1a and 2.1b.
2.3. Please specify the total proportion of your operations that are located in the regions at risk which you identified in questions 2.1 and/or 2.2. 0 15 99
2.4. The basis to use to calculate the percentages used for questions 2.1 and/or 2.2 2 answers
2.4. The basis to use to calculate the percentages used for questions 2.1 and/or 2.3 (value) #NAME?
2.5. Do any of your key inputs or raw materials (excluding water) come from regions subject to water-related risk? Yes
2.5a. Please state or estimate the percentage of your key water-intensive inputs (excluding water) that come from these regions-Transparency & Reporting #NAME?
2.5b. You may explain here why you are not able to identify if any of your key inputs or raw materials come from regions subject to water-related risk and whether you have plans to explore this issue in the future. NA
3.1. Is your company exposed to water-related risks (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure? Yes
3.1a. Please describe the current and/or future risks to your operations, the ways in which these risks affect or could affect your operations and your current or proposed strategies for managing them-Transparency & Reporting NA
3.1a. Please describe the current and/or future risks to your operations, the ways in which these risks affect or could affect your operations and your current or proposed strategies for managing them-Transparency & Reporting (value) #NAME?
3.1b. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to any water-related risks that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure. NA
3.1c. Please explain why you do not know if your company is exposed to any water-related risks that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure, and your plans to assess this risk in the future. NA
3.2. Country or geographical scale-Environment Policy & Reporting Country
3.2. What methodology do you use to analyze water-related risk across your operations?-Transparency & Reporting Answered
3.2. What methodology do you use to analyze water-related risk across your operations? CSX has an internal Risk Oversight Committee, which reviews the company risk profile and provides a methodology and framework for risk management and mitigation processes. Risk assessment is also a key component of our Environmental Management System (E
3.3. Do you require your key suppliers to report on their water use, risks and management? Yes
3.4. Is your supply chain exposed to water-related risks (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure? No
3.4b. Please explain why you do not consider your supply chain to be exposed to any water-related risks that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure. We believe our dispersed location of manufacturing facilities and large number of suppliers affords us redundancy, which mitigates risk to our business from localized events. Clorox also has a well-established and systematic enterprise risk management pr
3.4c. Please explain why you do not know if your supply chain is exposed to water-related risks that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure, and your plans to assess this risk in the future. NA
4.1. Has your business experienced any detrimental impacts related to water in the past five years? No
4.1. Please describe any detrimental impacts to business related to water your company has faced in the past five years, their financial impacts and whether they have resulted in any changes to company practices- Transparency & Reporting Answered
5.1. Do water-related issues present opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure? Yes
5.1a. Please describe the current and/or future opportunities, the ways in which these opportunities affect or could affect your operations and your current or proposed strategies for exploiting them-Environmental Policy & Reporting 3 answers
5.1a. Please describe the current and/or future opportunities, the ways in which these opportunities affect or could affect your operations and your current or proposed strategies for exploiting them-Environmental Policy & Reporting (value) #NAME?
5.1b. Please explain why you do not consider water-related issues to present opportunities to your company that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure or supply chain. NA
5.1c. Please explain why you do not know whether water-related issues present opportunities to your company that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure. NA
6.1. Has your company identified any linkages or trade-offs between water and carbon emissions in its operations or supply chain? No
6.1a. Please describe the linkages or trade-offs between water and carbon emissions in its operations or supply chain?--Transparency & Reporting NA
6.1a. Please describe the linkages or trade-offs and the related management policy or action between water and carbon emissions in its operations or supply chain?-Transparency & Reporting (value) NA
7.1. Are you able to provide data, whether measured or estimated, on water withdrawals within your operations? Yes
7.1a. Please report the water withdrawals within your operations for the reporting year-Transparency & Reporting 0
7.1a. Please report the water withdrawals within your operations for the reporting year-Transparency & Reporting (value) 0
7.1b. Please explain why you are not able to provide data for water withdrawals. NA
7.2. Are you able to provide data, whether measured or estimated, on water recycling/reuse within your operations? No
7.2a. Please report the water recycling/reuse within your operations for the reporting year-Transparency & Reporting NA
7.2a. Please report the water recycling/reuse within your operations for the reporting year-Transparency & Reporting (value) NA
7.2b. Please explain why you are not able to provide data for water recycling/reuse within your operations. Most Clorox facilities use recycled water in some way in their operations. The continuous use of recycled water is very common at most Clorox facilities. However the methods that we may use to calculate recycled water varies across facilities. The quanti
7.2b. Please explain why you are not able to provide data for water recycling/reuse within your operations-Transparency & Reporting Answered
7.3. Please use this space to describe the methodologies used for questions 7.1 and 7.2 or to report withdrawals or recycling/reuse in a different format to that set out above. We have installed water meters and city / municipal meters, where applicable, to accurately measure all incoming water sources for conducting our manufacturing operations (this water is used as product water as well as for manufacturing processes). We al
7.3. Please use this space to describe the methodologies used for questions 7.1 and 7.2 or to report withdrawals or recycling/reuse in a different format to that set out above-Transparency & Reporting Answered
7.4. Are any water sources significantly affected by your company's withdrawal of water? No
7.4a. Please list any water sources significantly affected by your company's withdrawal of water. NA
7.4b. You may explain here why your company's withrawal of water does not significantly affect any water sources. We have completed water source evaluations for all our sites where we withdraw water for product and process use. This includes water withdrawn from city sources, municipalities, ground and well water and other sources, and this has all been done with pr
7.4b. You may explain here why your company's withrawal of water does not significantly affect any water sources-Transparency & reporting Answered
7.4c. Please explain why you do not know if any water sources are significantly affected by your company's withdrawal of water. NA
8.1. Are you able to identify discharges of water from your operations by destination, by treatment method and by quantity and quality using standard effluent parameters? No
8.1a. Please explain why you are not able to identify discharges from your operations by destination, treatment method , quantity and quality, and whether you have any plans to put in place systems that would enable you to do so. Our operations have consistently maintained compliance with stringent permit limits and conditions at all our facility locations. There are no water bodies or related habitats that are negatively affected by the discharge of water or any runoff from our NA
8.2. Did your company pay any penalties or fines for significant breaches of discharge agreements or regulations in the reporting period? No NA
8.2a. Please describe the quality, quantity and destination of the water that was the subject of the significant breach(es), the associated fines and any actions taken to minimise the risk of future non-compliance NA NA
8.3. Are any water bodies and related habitats significantly affected by discharges of water or runoff from your operations? No NA
8.3a. Please list any water bodies and related habitats which are significantly affected by discharge of water or runoff from your operations NA NA
8.3b. You may explain here why your company's discharge of water does not significantly affect any water bodies or associated habitats. All water that is discharged from our operations is treated before discharge. All our operations have consistently maintained compliance at the local, state and federal level, with stringent permit conditions, regardless of the destination where we are d NA
8.3b. You may explain here why your company's discharge of water does not significantly affect any water bodies or related habitats-Tansparency & Reporting Answered NA
8.3c. Please explain why you do not know if any water bodies and associated habitats are significantly affected by discharge of water or runoff from your operations. NA NA
9.1. Please provide any available financial intensity values for your company's water use across its operations 3 answers NA
9.1. Please provide any available financial intensity values for your company's water use across its operations (value) #NAME? NA
9.2. Please provide any available water intensity values for your company's products or services across its operations. #NAME? NA
Please enter the name of the individual that has signed off (approved) the response and their job title Bill Morrissey, VP, Environmental Sustainability NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
2014 CEI Rating 100 NA
Firm-wide Organizational Competency Programs (10 points) Yes Yes NA
Fortune 1000 850 456 1 NA
Has Employer-Supported Employee Resource Group OR Firm-Wide Diversity Council (10 points) Yes Yes NA
Has Parity Across Other “Soft” Benefits for Partners (10 points) Yes Yes NA
Headquarters Location Oakland, CA NA
Offers Partner Health/Medical Insurance (15 points) Yes Yes NA
Offers Transgender-Inclusive Health Insurance Coverage (10 points) Yes Yes NA
Positively Engages the External LGBT Community (15 points) Yes Yes NA
Prohibits Discrimination Based on Gender Identity or Expression (15 points) Yes Yes NA
Prohibits Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation (15 points) Yes Yes NA
Responsible Citizenship Employers will have 25 points deducted from their score for a large-scale official or public anti-LGBT blemish on their recent records (-25 points) NA Yes NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Reduce 0 41 52 NA
Report 0 9 12 NA
Review 0 19 27 NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Rank by Context-Based Score (1 to 100) 100 40 1 Climate counts rank
Sustainable N Y Y If a company has a score of less than or equal to one (?1), it is considered “sustainable”, whereas a company with a score greater than one (>1) is considered “unsustainable”
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Rank 100 97 1 NA
CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2013
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Rank 1 86 100 NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Rank 1 29 100 NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
2011 Electricity Usage /MWh 35 768969 272242310 Annual electricity consumption resulting from all operations within the defined boundaries of a given organisation.
2011 Renewables Usage /MWh 5 17119 20498400 Total number of MWh of electricity or proxy purchased globally from renewable energy power-generating projects directly or indirectly.
Biomass/Biofuel (%) 0 NA 100 Biomass = woody waste; agricultural crops or waste; animal and other organic waste; energy crops; co-firing of biomass in fossil fuel generation plants. Biofuel = biofuels such as bioethanol and biodiesel.
Blend (%) 0 NA 100 Blend = renewable electricity consisting of a mix of renewables as provided by for example third-party marketers.
Country USA NA
Geothermal (%) 0 NA 79 Geothermal = all electricity from geothermal facilities.
Global CREX rank 1 241 280 The CREX participants are ranked based on the percentage of renewable electricity procured for their own use in 2011, calculated by dividing renewable electricity consumption by total electricity consumption for the period.
Hydro (%) 0 NA 100 Hydro = hydro projects from new generation capacity.
Sector Consumer Goods NA ICB system top-level industry designation (via the Bloomberg Terminal).
Solar (%) 0 NA 100 Solar = all electricity produced solar photovoltaics (PV) and solar thermal facilities.
Unknown (%) 0 NA 100
Waste to energy (%) 0 NA 100 Waste-to-energy = electricity using landfill gas or waste from other facilities such as wastewater treatment stations.
Wind (%) 0 NA 100 Wind = all electricity from wind turbines.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Reported Scope 3 Total (tCO2e) 670000000 148000 0 Indicated the total reported Scope 3 (all other indirect emissions) of the company in metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent (tCO2e) as defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol. Where no Scope 3 emissions are reported, this is recorded as "No Data"
Scope 1+2 Intensity 11162.43 68.44 0.3 Intensity is calculated by adding together a company's Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions and dividing by its turnover.
Global 800 Carbon Rank 800 50 1 Carbon Ranking of 800 international companies. Ranking is determined by EIO Methodology. See Source Info sheet for comments on it
No. of Scope 3 Categories Reported 1 2 15 This column indicates the number of Scope 3 Categories reported. Once placed into one of the four Disclosure Categories, companies are ranked by the number of Scope 3 categories disclosed.
Reported Scope 1+2 Total (tCO2e) 282000000 358000 843 The total reported Scope 1 (all direct emissions) and Scope 2 (indirect electricity emissions) of the company in metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent (tCO2e) as defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol
Accepted or Inferred Scope 3 Intensity 8547.13 856.03 64.51 Unless the company reports all 15 Scope 3 categories as defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Standard, an inferred figure based on the highest reported intensity for that sector, across the Global ET Universe, is shown
Category No Public Data Green Public, Complete, and Verified data Companies are placed into one of four data or 'disclosure' categories: 1) Public, Complete, and Verified data; 2) Public, Complete, and Unverified data; 3) Public, Incomplete, Verified or Unverified data; 4) No Public Data
Combined Scope 1+2+3 Intensity 12161.68 496.45 34.24 Combined Scope 1+2_3 Intensity is calculated by adding together a company's Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions at 100% (disclosed or inferred) + 50% of Scope 3 emissions (disclosed or inferred).
Market Value ($Million) 1667.87 9553 358143.1 A company's market value, or market capitalism (number of shares times x share price). This value was taken on 23.08.2011
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
ceo:numberOfRatings 1 117 4026 The number of ratings of the CEO
ceo:pctApprove 0 91 100 Percent of ratings of the CEO that were approving
ceo:title NA The title of the company's CEO
employer:numberOfRatings 1 146 6549 The number of Glassdoor users who have rated this company as a place to work.
Glassdoor Employer Ratings 1 3.4 5 The Top Companies for Work-Life Balance list is based on employee feedback shared in company reviews on Glassdoor.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
CO2 Productivity 607.9556 14646.5075 5209401.5137 NA
Leadership Diversity 0 0.1538 0.5 NA
Rank 100 41 1 NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Executive Diversity 0 0.12 0.41 Percentage of officers and directors that are female.
Percentage of Profit 0 -0.005 1.086 Percentage of profit donated.
Rank 500 138 1 NA
Toxicity produced 773771631 0 0 In pounds.
Toxicity released 113515588 0 0 In pounds.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Report reference ISO Standards? NA No NA NA
Sector NA Household and Personal Products NA NA
Country (HQ) NA United States of America NA NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Guidelines NA GRI - G3.1 NA This field indicates which version of the GRI Guidelines is used for the reporting. As of publication year 2009, GRI only includes reporting that makes use of the G3 Guidelines, which were released in October 2006.
Integrated No Yes Yes GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
Publication Year 2013 GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
Region NA Northern America NA Region the organization operates in.
Report Html Address NA http://annualreport.thecloroxcompany.com/ NA URL of the report location.
Report Pdf Address NA http://annualreport.thecloroxcompany.com/_pdf/Clorox_2013_Annual_Report.pdf NA Location of a PDF version of the report.
Report Title NA 2013 Annual Report NA Title of the report.
Sector NA Household and Personal Products NA Industry sector.
Sector Supplements (Final) NA Not Applicable NA This field indicates if the reporting organization has made use of one of the final Sector Supplements and which one. If ‘not used’ is indicated, it means that one of the final Sector Supplements is applicable, but has not been used. If ‘not applicable’ i
Size NA Large NA GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Disclosure 0 74.3 100 Environmental disclosure was included as a stand-alone score to assess each company’s transparency with regard to its environmental performance. Specifically, this score evaluates the breadth and quality of company environmen
Green Score 21.4 51.4 82.9 NA
Envtl. Mgmt. 21.3 49.7 91.9 Based on an analysis of companies tracked in Sustainalytics’ Global Platform, the Environmental Management Score is an assessment of how a company manages its environmental performance through policies, programs, targets, certifications, and the like. To
Envtl. Impact 0 48 89 Based on data compiled by Trucost, this is a comprehensive, quantitative, and standardized measurement of the overall environmental impact of a company’s global operations. More than 700 metrics—including emissions of nine key greenhouse gases, water use,
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Carbon Productivity 0.003 0.328 0.97 GHG Productivity defined as Revenue ($US) / Total Greenhouse gas (GHG) Emissions (CO2e).
Energy Productivity 0.021 0.323 0.971 Energy Productivity defined as Revenue ($US) / Total Energy Consumption (GJ).
Newsweek Green Score 0.014 0.582 0.851 This score is derived from the following component scores: an Energy Productivity,Carbon Productivity, Water Productivity, Waste Productivity, Reputation, Pay Link, Sustainability Themed Committee, Audit ; weighted at 45 percent, 45 percent, and 10 percen
Pay Link No Yes Yes A mechanism to link the remuneration of any member of a company's senior executive team with the achievement of environmental performance targets.
Rank 500 43 1
Reputation 0.005 0.801 1.0 The Reputation score is made up of two components: (1) The RepRisk Index, which is a quantitative measure that captures criticism and quantifies a company exposure to ESG risks. (2) The second component is based on the number of environmental issues that
Sustainability Themed Committee No Yes Yes The existence of a committee at the Board of Directors level whose mandate is related to the sustainability of the company, including but not limited to environmental matters.
Waste Productivity 0.014 0.494 0.97 Waste Productivity is defined as Revenue ($US) / [Total waste generated (metric tonnes) – waste recycled/reused (metric tonnes)].
Water Productivity 0.028 0.336 0.992 Water Productivity is defined as Revenue ($US) / Total water use (m3).
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Corporate Governance 3 0.4 0 The scores for each ESG scope issue ranges from 0-3. The scoring refers to the number of times the company was criticized in relation to that scope issue: 0 = little or no exposure in the past 4 years; 1 = 5 direct relations in the past 4 years; 2 = 10 direct relations in the past 4 years; 3 = 20 direct relations in the past 4 years.
Current RRI 86 22 0 The RepRisk Index (RRI) is a quantitative risk measure that captures criticism and quantifies a company's exposure to controversial environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues. It does not measure a company's overall reputation, but rather is an indicator of their reputational risk.The Current RRI value indicates the current level of criticism about a company.
Employee Relations 3 0 0 The scores for each ESG scope issue ranges from 0-3. The scoring refers to the number of times the company was criticized in relation to that scope issue: 0 = little or no exposure in the past 4 years; 1 = 5 direct relations in the past 4 years; 2 = 10 direct relations in the past 4 years; 3 = 20 direct relations in the past 4 years.
Environmental FootPrint 3 0.2 0 The scores for each ESG scope issue ranges from 0-3. The scoring refers to the number of times the company was criticized in relation to that scope issue: 0 = little or no exposure in the past 4 years; 1 = 5 direct relations in the past 4 years; 2 = 10 direct relations in the past 4 years; 3 = 20 direct relations in the past 4 years.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Rank 400 306 1 REPORTWATCH RATING
Report Rating D B A REPORTWATCH RATING
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
WeGreen
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Weighted score 1.2 1.9 5.9

Flags

(Other Indicators - things that don’t affect ratings but that help identify or classify companies)

SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
You have put report(s) in your cart
Go to my cart
Ok