CSRHub is the world’s largest CSR (corporate social responsibility) and sustainability ratings and information database.

Nestle is one of the largest food and nutrition companies in the world, founded and headquartered in Vevey, Switzerland.

Ticker: NESN-VX ISIN: CH0012056047
Address: Avenue Nestle 55 , Switzerland , Vevey , CA , 1800 Website: Nestle
Phone #: 41-21-9242111 CSR Web Area: SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Basic Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Ratings

  Overall Community Employees Environment Governance
Nestle 62 54 60 69 60
Food Products
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
All company average 55 55 56 58 52
Switzerland
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Percentile Rankings

Rankings are in percentile terms, compared to other companies in the same industry and country Overall Community Employees Environment Governance
Nestle 85% 44% 62% 85% 75%
Food Products
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Switzerland
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Special Issues: Animal Test User

Ratings History

Only subscribers can interact with the graph.

More CSR Rating Details

  Community Employees
Community Dev & Philanthropy Product Human Rights & Supply Chain Compensation & Benefits Diversity & Labor Rights Training, Health & Safety
Nestle
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Food Products
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
All company average 53 54 55 58 55 55
Switzerland
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Environment Governance
Energy & Climate Change Environmant Policy & Reporting Resource Management Board Leadership Ethics Transparency & Reporting
Nestle
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Food Products
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
All company average 57 58 57 50 55 51
Switzerland
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Percentile rankings

Rankings are in percentile terms, compared to other companies in the same industry and country Community Employees
Community Dev & Philantrophy Product Human Rights & Supply Chain Compensation & Benefits Diversity & Labor Rights Training, Health & Safety
Nestle 38% 78% 18% 60% 51% 71%
Food Products
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Switzerland
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Environment Governance
Energy & Climate Change Environment Policy & Reporting Resource Management Board Leadership Ethics Transparency & Reporting
Nestle 87% 88% 75% 69% 61% 92%
Food Products
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Switzerland
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

1 Special Issues Affect This Company (see a list of issues here)

Animal Test User
# of Sources 3
# of co. % of co.
Food Products
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Overall database 115 1.2
Switzerland
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

CSRHub Has 85 Data Sources (50 Are Currently Active) for This Company

= sources impacting the current ratings
= sources not impacting the current ratings, but included in earlier ratings for this company
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Original Data Values

(unsubscribed users can see the list, subscribers can see the data details for most sources)

Data source name

Data source element name Minimum value Value provided by datasource Maximum value Data description
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Brand Value / Enterprise Value (%) -48.164682123 0.1806 316.6056 NA
Brand Value 2012 4831.6797 NA
BSI 50 71.0828 88.4717 NA
Domicile SWITZERLAND NA
Enterprise Value NA 24521.1432 NA NA
Reviewed ? YES NA
Sector Consumer, Non-cyclical NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Brand Value 2013 11.095 6543.6521 67875.2014 NA
BSI 50 71.555 89.6275 NA
Domicile SWITZERLAND NA
Sector Consumer, Non-cyclical NA
Reviewed mh NA
Brand Rating 2013 BBB AA- AAA+ NA
Enterprise Value 2013 0 28328.1783 435750.9811
Brand Finance 2013-14
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Brand Value / Enterprise Value (%) 0.009 0.2333 1.07 NA
Brand Value 2014 10 8064.9064 87304 A brand strength is assessed by using our Brand Strength Index framework. This benchmarks the strength, risk and future potential of a brand relative to its competitors by assessing input measures, brand equity measures, and output performance across four
BSI 51.3 79.1901 94.2 NA
Domicile SWITZERLAND NA
Enterprise Value 2014 66 28725.7948 526619 NA
Sector Consumer, Non-cyclical NA
Better World Companies
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
0. Further Information NA Please see attach: - The Nestlé Corporate Business Principles- The Nestlé Policy on Environmental Sustainability - Nestlé Annual Report 2011 - Nestlé Creating Shared Value Report 2011 NA NA
0.1. Introduction - Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. NA Nestlé is the world's leading Nutrition, Health and Wellness company. Nestlé is committed to increasing the nutritional value of our products while improving the taste. Nestlé achieves this through its brands and with initiatives like the Nutritional Comp NA NA
5.1e Identified climate change risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments? NA Yes NA NA
5.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA Oth1(i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking actionThe financial implication of the food waste in the supply chain, especially for milk, are estimated in 20 CHF million a year. The estimation is based on the reduction of GHG rela NA NA
5.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
5.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
5.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
6. Attachments NA NA NA NA
6. Further Information NA NA NA NA
6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Opportunities driven by changes in regulation; Opportunities driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA NA
6.1a Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in regulation? NA Yes NA NA
6.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA Re 1 i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity Cap and trade schemes present incentives to cutting GHG emissions cost-effectively. By putting a price on each tonne of carbon emitted, the EU ETS is driving investment in low-carbon technolo NA NA
6.1c Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in physical climate parameters? NA Yes NA NA
14. Attachments NA NA NA NA
6.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA Ph 1i) the potential financial implications of the opportunityClimate change can result in increasing production of key agricultural raw materials which can result in increase in long term supply of key agricultural raw materials. Increasing the supply of NA NA
6.1e Identified opportunities that are driven by changes in other climate-related developments? NA Yes NA NA
6.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA Oth 1 , Oth 2i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity We have estimated that this opportunity can result on a financial implication of CHF 3m. This has been estimated by considering the likelihood and the impact of increasing reputation NA NA
13. Attachments NA https://webadmin.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/42/12942/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/13.EmissionsPerformance/2011-Financial-Statements-EN.pdf NA NA
11. Attachments NA NA NA NA
11. Further Information NA NA NA NA
11.1. Do you consider that the grid average factors used to report Scope 2 emissions in Question 8.3 reflect the contractual arrangements you have with electricity suppliers? NA Yes NA NA
11.1a. You may report a total contractual Scope 2 figure in response to this question. Please provide your total global contractual Scope 2 GHG emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 0 NA 17902000 NA
11.2. Has your organization retired any certificates, e.g. Renewable Energy Certificates, associated with zero or low carbon electricity within the reporting year or has this been done on your behalf? NA Yes NA NA
3.1e. Please explain (i) why not; and (ii) forecast how your emissions will change over the next five years NA NA NA NA
3.2. Does the use of your goods and/or services directly enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party? No Yes Yes NA
3.2a. Please provide details (see guidance) NA Efficient coffee machines i. How the emissions are/were avoided This refers to our coffee machines of our Nescafé Dolce Gusto and Nespresso business. Operating a machine consumes a significant amount of electricity, especially when used below its full cap NA NA
3.3c Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities. 0 7 12 NA
3.3c. What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities? NA Lower return on investment (ROI) specification, Dedicated budget for energy efficiency, Marginal abatement cost curve, Internal incentives/recognition programs, Employee engagement, Compliance with regulatory requirements/standards, Partnering with govern NA NA
5. Attachments NA NA NA NA
5. Further Information NA NA NA NA
5.1. Have you identified any climate change risks (current or future) that have potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Risks driven by changes in regulation; Risks driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA NA
5.1a Identified risks driven by changes in regulation? NA NA NA NA
5.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA Re1(i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking actionNestlé has analyzed the financial implications for its factories in EU ETS Phase II and Phase III. Assuming a CO2 price of 25€/tonne, the financial implication of the EU-ETS is es NA NA
14. Further Information NA NA NA NA
1.1. Where is the highest level of direct responsibility for climate change within your company? No individual or committee with overall responsibility for climate change Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board NA
1.1a. Please identify the position of the individual or name of the committee with this responsibility NA The highest level of direct responsibility for climate change is Mr. José Lopez, Executive Vice President of Operations and GLOBE (Global Business Excellence). He is in particular responsible for Procurement, Manufacturing, Supply Chain, Quality Managemen NA NA
1.2. Do you provide incentives for the management of climate change issues, including the attainment of targets? No Yes Yes NA
13. Further Information NA For more information please refer to our CSV report 2011 attached. NA NA
13.1. How do your absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year compare to the previous year? Increased Decreased Decreased NA
13.1a (i) If absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) have increased, decreased or remained the same overall compared to the previous year, state direction of change NA Slightly Decreased NA NA
13.1a (ii) If absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) have increased, decreased or remained the same overall compared to the previous year, state the reason for the direction of change NA Increase: Emissions reduction activities, Decrease: Change in output NA NA
13.1a (iii) If emissions have increased, decreased or remained the same overall, provide the emissions value (%) NA Decrease: , Increase: , Emission value for which direction is not stated: NA NA
2012 Score 0 100 100 NA
2012 Performance Band E A A NA
2.3a. Please explain (i) the engagement process and (ii) actions you are advocating NA We engage with policy makers to encourage further action on mitigation and adaptationTopic: Climate change mitigation and adaptationi) Engagement methodBeing part of leading sustainability organizations dealing with climate change and participating in tra NA NA
8.8. Are carbon dioxide emissions from the combustion of biologically sequestered carbon (i.e. carbon dioxide emissions from burning biomass/biofuels) relevant to your company? No Yes Yes NA
8.8a. Please provide the emissions in metric tonnes CO2e 0.01 647000 27263000 NA
Management 4. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/42/12942/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/4.Communication/2011-Annual-Report-.pdf NA NA
Management 4. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? NA 4 NA NA
5.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA Ph 1i) the potential financial implications of the riskThe financial impact due to major supply chain disruption and interrupting process along the value chain due to climate change are estimating on 96 million CHF. This is estimated based on the magnitud NA NA
2. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/42/12942/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/2.Strategy/2011-Annual-Report-.pdf NA NA
2. Further Information NA For more information on Environmental Sustainability, please visit: http://www.nestle.com/csv/Environment/Pages/Environmentalsustainability.aspx For more information on Principal risks and uncertainties. See section Group Risk Management (pg40-41) of 2 NA NA
5.1c Identified climate change risks driven by change in physical climate parameters? NA Yes NA NA
2.1. Please select the option that best describes your risk management procedures with regard to climate change risks and opportunities NA Integrated into multi-disciplinary company wide risk management processes NA NA
2.1a. Please provide further details (see guidance) NA a. Scope of processOur culture combines a long-term mindset with short-term action. It encompasses a passion for quality – in products, in relationships, in everything we do. It is focused on competitiveness, calculated risk-taking ând opportunities; and NA NA
2.2. Is climate change integrated into your business strategy? No Yes Yes NA
2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes (see guidance) NA Climate change has influenced our strategy and is integrated in our business strategy. Our business strategy is linked to emission reduction targets and to climate change risk and opportunities.1. The processClimate change has being identified as one impo NA NA
2.2b. Please explain why not NA NA NA NA
2.3. Do you engage with policy makers to encourage further action on mitigation and/or adaptation? No Yes Yes NA
3. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/42/12942/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/3.TargetsandInitiatives/Definitions and comments on Environmental Performance Indicators 2011.pdf NA NA
3. Further Information NA For more information, please download the following documents: Nestlé Environmental Performance Indicators 2011 Definitions and comments on Environmental Performance Indicators 2011 For more information on Environmental Sustainability at Nestlé pleas NA NA
3.1. Did you have an emissions reduction target that was active (ongoing or reached completion) in the reporting year? No Absolute and intensity targets Absolute and intensity targets NA
14.1. Do you participate in any emission trading schemes? No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next two years Yes Yes NA
14.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? No Yes Yes NA
6.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
6.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
6.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
7. Attachments NA NA NA NA
7. Further Information NA Nestlé has developed an internal tool, Nestlé Environment & Safety Performance Tracking Tool (NEST), through which factories enter monthly their environmental information; in particular energy and refrigerants consumption data and which calculates corresp NA NA
7.1. Please provide your base year and base year emissions (Scopes 1 and 2) NA NA NA NA
0.4. Currency selection Please select the currency in which you would like to submit your response. All financial information contained in the response should be in this currency. NA CHF NA NA
1. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/42/12942/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/1.Governance/Nestlé Corp_Governance_Report_2011_EN.pdf NA NA
1. Further Information NA For more information on Corporate Governance, Please see http://www.nestle.com/Investors/CorporateGovernance/Pages/Corporate-Governance.aspx NA NA
8.7. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 2 emissions More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% NA More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% NA
11.1b. Explain the basis of the alternative figure (see guidance) NA NA
14.1b. What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? EU-ETS process: At the end of 2011, 21 Nestlé factories were participating in the EU ETS Phase II. The situation on emissions and allowances of each factory is closely managed and analysed by Environmental Managers in each country on a monthly basis. The NA
8.1. Please select the boundary you are using for your Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas inventory NA NA NA NA
8.2a. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 92 NA 231902967 NA
8.3a. Please provide your gross global Scope 2 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 293 NA 8071070 NA
8.4. Are there are any sources (e.g. facilities, specific GHGs, activities, geographies, etc.) of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions which are not included in your disclosure? NA Yes NA NA
8.6. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 1 emissions More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% NA More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
8.7. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 2 emissions Third party verification or assurance complete Proportion of Scope 2 emissions that are verified/assured for 2011-2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.7a. Please indicate the proportion of your Scope 2 emissions that are verified/assured More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% More than 90% but less than or equal to 100%
8.7b Reporting Period From/To/Please provide further details of the verification/assurance undertaken, and attach the relevant statements/Type of verification or assurance/Relevant standard/Attach the document No Response
8.8. Are carbon dioxide emissions from biologically sequestered carbon relevant to your organization? Yes
8.8a. Please provide the emissions in metric tonnes CO2 683750
8.8a. Please provide the emissions in metric tonnes CO2e 0.05 683750 13638000
9.1. Do you have Scope 1 emissions sources in more than one country? Yes
9.1a Reporting Period From/To/Please complete the table below: Country/Region/Scope 1 metric tonnes CO2e 1 Jan 2012/31 Dec 2012/United States of America/632069
9.2. Please indicate which other Scope 1 emissions breakdowns you are able to provide (tick all that apply) NA By business division; By facility NA
9.2a Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by business division: Business division/Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) 1 Jan 2012/31 Dec 2012/Cereal Partner Worldwide/67896
9.2b Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by facility: Facility/Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) No Response
9.2c Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by GHG type: GHG type/Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) No Response
9.2d Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by activity: Activity/Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) No Response
9.2e Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by legal structure: Legal structure/Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) No Response
0.3. Country list configuration Bermuda
0.4. Currency selection Please select the currency in which you would like to submit your response. All financial information contained in the response should be in this currency. CHF
0.4. Please select the currency in which you would like to submit your response. CHF
0.5. Please select if you wish to complete a shorter information request. NA
0.6. Modules NA As part of the Investor CDP information request, electric utilities, companies with electric utility activities or assets, companies in the automobile or auto component manufacture sectors and companies in the oil and gas industry should complete suppleme
1. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/sites/2013/42/12942/Investor CDP 2013/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2013/1.Governance/Nestlé 2012 Integrated Annual Report Pack.pdf NA
1. Further Information NA For more information on Corporate Governance, Please seehttp://www.nestle.com/Investors/CorporateGovernance/Pages/Corporate-Governance.aspx Please find enclosed our 2012 Nestlé integrated full annual report pack. NA
1.1. Where is the highest level of direct responsibility for climate change within your company? No individual or committee with overall responsibility for climate change Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board
1.1a. Please identify the position of the individual or name of the committee with this responsibility NA The highest level of direct responsibility for climate change is Mr. José Lopez, Executive Vice President of Operations and GLOBE (Global Business Excellence). He is in particular responsible for Procurement, Manufacturing, Supply Chain, Quality Managemen NA
1.2. Do you provide incentives for the management of climate change issues, including the attainment of targets? No Yes Yes
1.2a. Who is entitled to benefit from these incentives? Board/Executive board/Monetary reward/Meeting GHG emission reduction targets including Scope 1 & 2 emissions. The short term bonus payout is determined by the degree of achievement of a number of annual operating objectives, including the reduction of
10.1. Do you have Scope 2 emissions sources in more than one country? Yes
10.1a Reporting Period: From/To/Please complete the table below: Country/Region/Scope 2 metric tonnes CO2e/Purchased and consumed electricity, heat, steam or cooling (MWh)/Purchased and consumed low carbon electricity, heat, steam or cooling (MWh) 1 Jan 2012/31 Dec 2012/United States of America/1301642/2368736/0
10.2. Please indicate which other Scope 2 emissions breakdowns you are able to provide (tick all that apply) NA By business division; By facility NA
10.2a Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by business division: Business division/Scope 2 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) 1 Jan 2012/31 Dec 2012/Cereal Partners Worldwide/104651
10.2b Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by facility: Facility/Scope 2 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) 1 Jan 2012/31 Dec 2012/US PL Anderson/89445
10.2c Reporting Period: From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by activity: Activity/Scope 2 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) No Response
10.2d Reporting Period: From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by legal structure: Legal structure/Scope 2 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) No Response
11. Attachments NA NA NA
11. Further Information NA NA NA
11.1. What percentage of your total operational spend in the reporting year was on energy? More than 0% but less than or equal to 5% More than 0% but less than or equal to 5% More than 95% but less than or equal to 100%
11.2. Please state how much fuel, electricity, heat, steam, and cooling in MWh your organization has purchased and consumed during the reporting year: Energy type/MWh Fuel/18079961;Electricity/7019183;Heat/31247;Steam/433618;Cooling/0
11.3. Please complete the table by breaking down the total "Fuel" figure entered above by fuel type: Fuels/MWh Anthracite/100899
11.4. Please provide details of the electricity, heat, steam or cooling amounts that were accounted at a low carbon emission factor: Basis for applying a low carbon emission factor/MWh associated with low carbon electricity, heat, steam or cooling Power Purchase Agreements (PPA) not backed by instruments/53148
12. Attachments NA
12. Further Information NA
12.1. How do your absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year compare to the previous year? Increased
12.1a Reason of change Emissions reduction activities, Divestment, Acquisitions, Mergers, Change in output, Change in methodology, Change in boundary, Change in physical operating conditions, Unidentified, Other
12.1a. Reason: Emissions value (percentage) Emissions reduction activities: 5.2/Change in output: 5.5/Change in methodology: 0.32/
12.2. Please describe your gross combined Scope 1 and 2 emissions for the reporting year in metric tonnes CO2e per revenue: Intensity figure/Metric numerator/% change from previous year/Direction of change from previous year/Reason for change 77/metric tonnes CO2e/8.53/Decrease/The intensity figure is expressed in tonne of CO2e per million of CHF revenue. GHG emissions scope 1 and 2 decreased mainly because of emissions reduction initiatives. In our operations we continue to reduce GHG emissio
12.3. Please describe your gross combined Scope 1 and 2 emissions for the reporting year in metric tonnes CO2e per FTE: Intensity figure/Metric numerator/% change from previous year/Direction of change from previous year/Reason for change 20.9/metric tonnes CO2e/2.71/Decrease/The intensity figure is expressed in tonne of CO2e per employee. The GHG emissions intensity scope 1 and 2 by FTE employee decreased because of emissions reduction initiatives. Through our energy efficiency efforts a
12.4. Please provide an additional intensity (normalized) metric that is appropriate to your business operations: Intensity figure/Metric numerator/% change from previous year/Direction of change from previous year/Reason for change 148.8/metric tonnes CO2e/4.4/Decrease/The intensity figure is expressed in tonne of CO2e per tonne of product. GHG emissions scope 1 and 2 decreased mainly because of emissions reduction initiatives. Through our energy efficiency efforts and the expansion
13.1. Do you participate in any emissions trading schemes? Yes
13.1b. What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? EU-ETS process: At the end of 2012, 21 Nestlé factories were participating in the EU ETS Phase II. The situation on emissions and allowances of each factory is closely managed and analysed by Environmental Managers in each country on a monthly basis. The
13.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? Yes
14. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/sites/2013/42/12942/Investor CDP 2013/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2013/13.EmissionsTrading/Nestle-CSV-Full-Report-2012-EN.pdf NA
14. Further Information NA NA NA
14.1. Do you participate in any emission trading schemes? No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next two years Yes Yes
14.1b. What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? EU-ETS process: At the end of 2012, 21 Nestlé factories were participating in the EU ETS Phase II. The situation on emissions and allowances of each factory is closely managed and analysed by Environmental Managers in each country on a monthly basis. The
14.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? No Yes Yes
14.2. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 3 emissions Third party verification or assurance complete
14.2a. Please indicate the proportion of your Scope 3 emissions that are verified/assured More than 90% but less than or equal to 100%
14.3. Are you able to compare your Scope 3 emissions for the reporting year with those for the previous year for any sources? Yes
14.4. Do you engage with any of the elements of your value chain on GHG emissions and climate change strategies? (Tick all that apply) Yes, our suppliers; Yes, our customers; Yes, other partners in the value chain
14.4a. Please give details of methods of engagement, your strategy for prioritizing engagements and measures of success We engage along the value chain of our products on GHG emissions and climate change strategies, from farm to consumers and beyond. The strategy for prioritising engagement is based on the stage of the life cycle stage of our products and is based on the m
14.4d. Please explain why not and any plans you have to develop an engagement strategy in the future NA
2. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/sites/2013/42/12942/Investor CDP 2013/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2013/2.Strategy/Nestlé Commitment on climate change.pdf NA
2. Further Information NA Food Drink Europe's detailed position is available at: http://www.fooddrinkeurope.eu/uploads/statements_documents/Final_climate_change.pdf WBCSD: http://www.wbcsd.org/newsroom/faq.aspx For more information on governance, please see http://www.nestle.com/c NA
2.1. Please select the option that best describes your risk management procedures with regard to climate change risks and opportunities NA Integrated into multi-disciplinary company wide risk management processes NA
2.1a. Please provide further details a. Scope of processOur culture combines a long-term mindset with short-term action. It encompasses a passion for quality – in products, in relationships, in everything we do. It is focused on competitiveness, calculated risk-taking and opportunities; and
2.1a. Please provide further details (see guidance) NA a. Scope of processOur culture combines a long-term mindset with short-term action. It encompasses a passion for quality – in products, in relationships, in everything we do. It is focused on competitiveness, calculated risk-taking and opportunities; and NA
2.2. Is climate change integrated into your business strategy? No Yes Yes
2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes Climate change has influenced our strategy and is integrated in our business strategy. Our business strategy is linked to emission reduction targets and to climate change risk and opportunities.1. The processClimate change has being identified as one issu
2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes (see guidance) NA Climate change has influenced our strategy and is integrated in our business strategy. Our business strategy is linked to emission reduction targets and to climate change risk and opportunities.1. The processClimate change has being identified as one issu NA
2.2b. Please explain why not NA NA NA
2.3. Do you engage in activities that could either directly or indirectly influence policy on climate change through any of the following? (tick all that apply) Yes
2.3. Do you engage with policy makers to encourage further action on mitigation and/or adaptation? No Yes Yes
2.3a. On what issues have you been engaging directly?: Focus of legislation/Corporate Position/Details of engagement/Proposed solution Other: Sustainable consumption/Support/In 2012, we participated in the European public consultation on "Delivering more Sustainable Consumption and Production". The European Commission (EC) wants to gather views on the possible introduction of EU wide me
2.3a. Please explain (i) the engagement process and (ii) actions you are advocating NA In 2012, we participated in the European public consultation on "Delivering more Sustainable Consumption and Production". The European Commission (EC) wants to gather views on the possible introduction of EU wide measures related to Sustainable Consumpti NA
2.3b. Are you on the Board of any trade associations or provide funding beyond membership? Yes
2.3c. Please enter the details of those trade associations that are likely to take a position on climate change legislation/Trade association Consumer Goods Forum/Consistent/The Consumer Goods Forum (CGF) is a global industry network that brings together the CEOs and senior management of over 650 retailers, manufacturers, service providers and other stakeholders across 70 countries. It is focus
2.3d. Do you publically disclose a list of all the research organizations that you fund? No
2.3e. Do you fund any research organizations to produce public work on climate change? Yes
2.3f. Please describe the work and how it aligns with your own strategy on climate change We support the Cambridge Programme for Sustainability Leadership and its Natural Capital Leaders Platform, which brings together leading thinkers and practitioners in the search for pragmatic and practical solutions.In 2012, the Cambridge Programme for Su
2.3g. Please provide details of the other engagement activities that you undertake Other engagement activities undertaken include the following partnerships: The Forest Trust: In 2010, we entered into a partnership with The Forest Trust (TFT), a global non-profit organisation whose main focus has been to provide solutions to the issue o
2.3h. What processes do you have in place to ensure that all of your direct and indirect activities that influence policy are consistent with your overall climate change strategy? To ensure that all of our direct and indirect activities that influence policy are consistent with our overall climate change strategy, we have established the governance of "Nestlé in society and CSV (Creating Shared Value)".Within our general corporate
2.3i. Please explain why you do not engage with policy makers NA
3. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/sites/2013/42/12942/Investor CDP 2013/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2013/3.TargetsandInitiatives/CNEPI_2012_FINAL_online_version.xlsx NA
3. Further Information NA For more information, please find enclosed the following documents:*Nestlé Environmental Performance Indicators 2012*Definitions and comments on Environmental Performance Indicators 2012 For more information on Environmental Sustainability at Nestlé pleas NA
3.1. Did you have an emissions reduction target that was active (ongoing or reached completion) in the reporting year? No Absolute and intensity targets Absolute and intensity targets
3.1a. Absolute target/ID/Scope/% of emissions in scope/% reduction from base year/Base year/Base year emissions (metric tonnes CO2e)/Target year/Comment Abs 1/Scope 1/100/2/2011/3806467/2012/Nestlé established a specific absolute target on direct GHGs while our demand for product continue to rise: Continue decoupling direct CO2 emissions, i.e. absolute direct greenhouse gas emissions reduction of 2% on
3.1b. Intensity target/ID/Scope/% of emissions in scope/% reduction from base year/Metric/Base year/Normalized base year emissions/Target year/Comment Int 1/Scope 1/100/35/metric tonnes CO2e per metric tonne of product/2005/118.4/2015/Nestlé established a specific target on GHGs reduction: Continue decoupling of energy generation and CO2 emissions, i.e. greenhouse gas emissions reductions of 35% on a co
3.1c. What change in absolute emissions this intensity target reflects/ID/Direction of change anticipated in absolute Scope 1+2 emissions at target completion?/% change anticipated in absolute Scope 1+2 emissions Int 1/Decrease/5///The average percentage change of our production volume over the last 7 years (2005-2012) corresponds to 4.5% (production volume in 2005 is 36.4 million tonnes and in 2012 it is 47.7 million tonnes). If we assume that this average percen
3.1d. Please provide details on your progress against this target made in the reporting year/ID/% complete (time)/% complete (emissions)/Comment Int 1/70/96/Per tonne of product, we reduced our Scope 1 GHG emissions from 118.4 tonnes of CO2e per tonne of product in 2005 to 77.7 tonnes of CO2e per tonne of product in 2012.
3.1e. Please explain (i) why not; and (ii) forecast how your emissions will change over the next five years NA NA NA
3.2. Does the use of your goods and/or services directly enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party? No Yes Yes
3.2a. Please provide details (see guidance) NA Packaging source optimisation programme & Processed food vs equivalent homemade foodi)How the emissions are/were avoidedOur food and beverages directly saves GHG emissions when compared with processed food which often has a better environmental perfo NA
3.3. Did you have emissions reduction initiatives that were active within the reporting year (this can include those in the planning and/or implementation phases) No Yes Yes
3.3a. Please identify the total number of projects at each stage of development, and for those in theimplementation stages, the estimated CO2e savings/Stage of development/3.3a. Number of projects/Total estimated annual CO2e savings in metric tonnes CO2e Under investigation/853/173000
3.3c Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities. 0 9 13 Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities.
3.3c. What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities? NA Lower return on investment (ROI) specification, Dedicated budget for energy efficiency, Marginal abatement cost curve, Internal incentives/recognition programs, Employee engagement, Compliance with regulatory requirements/standards, Partnering with govern NA
3.3c. What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities?/Comment Lower return on investment (ROI) specification/The energy and other related sustainability projects are assessed separately using various parameters, such as energy savings in absolute GJ, absolute CO2 emission avoidance, absolute water savings and ROI. L
4. Attachments NA
4. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? - Further Information In our 2012 integrated annual report pack, we state clearly that our business is based on sustainability – ensuring that our activities preserve our business as well as our environment for future generations. Our integrated annual report pack contains the
4.1. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? 4 The number of corporate annual reports and voluntary publications (complete and/or underway) made about the company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance
5. Attachments NA NA NA
5. Further Information NA NA NA
5.1. Have you identified any climate change risks (current or future) that have potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Risks driven by changes in regulation; Risks driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA
5.1a. Climate change risks driven by changes in regulation Yes
5.1a. Please describe your risks driven by changes in regulation /ID/Risk driver/ Description/Potential impact/Timeframe/Direct/Indirect/Likelihood/Magnitude of impact Re 1/Cap and trade schemes/The first and the largest international cap and trade system to reduce industrial GHG emissions is the European Emission Trading Scheme (EU ETS), currently in Phase III and running until 2020. During this period, drastic GHG emi
5.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk and (iii) the costs associated with these actions Re1(i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking actionNestlé has analysed the financial implications for its factories in EU ETS Phase III. Assuming a CO2 price of 10.2CHF/tonne in 2020 (progressive price from CHF 4.8 in 2013 to CHF
5.1c. Climate change risks driven by change in physical climate parameters Yes
5.1c. Please describe your risks that are driven by change in physical climate parameters/ID/Risk driver/Description/Potential impact/Timeframe/Direct/Indirect/Likelihood/Magnitude of impact Ph 1/Change in precipitation extremes and droughts/Changing temperatures and precipitations patterns may lead to decreased availability of critical raw materials in the supply chain, especially agricultural commodities. As Nestlé business relies on raw ma
5.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA Ph 1i) the potential financial implications of the riskThe financial impact due to major supply chain disruption and interrupting process along the value chain due to climate change are estimating at CHF 146 million increase in cost. This is estimated bas NA
5.1e. Please describe your risks that are driven by changes in other climate-related developments/ID/Risk driver/Description/Potential impact/Timeframe/Direct/Indirect/Likelihood/Magnitude of impact Kobo/Sea level rise//Inability to do business/Unknown/Indirect (Supply chain)/About as likely as not/Medium
5.1e.Climate change risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments Yes
5.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA Oth1 (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking actionA reduction of demand for our products due to consumers perceptions that the carbon footprint of our products is not as low as competitors can result in reduced demand of produc NA
5.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
5.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
5.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
6. Attachments NA NA NA
6. Further Information NA NA NA
6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Opportunities driven by changes in regulation; Opportunities driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA
6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? -Transparency Yes
6.1a Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in regulation? NA Yes NA
6.1a. Please describe your opportunities that are driven by changes in regulation/ID/Opportunity driver/Description/Potential impact/Timeframe/Direct/Indirect/Likelihood/Magnitude of impact Re 1/Cap and trade schemes/Cap and trade schemes present incentives to cutting greenhouse gas emissions cost-effectively through energy efficiency in our factories which reduced GHG emission. By end of 2012, Nestlé had 21 factories in the European Union
6.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity and (iii) the costs associated with these actions Re 1 i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity Cap and trade schemes present incentives to cutting GHG emissions cost-effectively. By putting a price on each tonne of carbon emitted, the EU ETS is driving investment in low-carbon technolo
6.1c. Please describe the opportunities that are driven by changes in physical climate parameters Yes
6.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity and (iii) the costs associated with these actions Ph 1i) the potential financial implications of the opportunityClimate change can result in increasing production of key agricultural raw materials which can result in increase in long term supply of key agricultural raw materials. Increasing the supply of
6.1e. Please describe the opportunities that are driven by changes in other climate-related developments Yes
6.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA Oth 1i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity We have estimated that this opportunity can result in a positive financial implication of CHF 7 million on our revenue. This estimation is based on Nestlé Group Enterprise Risk Management Fra NA
6.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
6.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
6.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
7. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/sites/2013/42/12942/Investor CDP 2013/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2013/7.EmissionsMethodology/Nestlé 2012 Emission Factors-CDP.xlsx NA
7. Further Information NA Nestlé has developed an internal tool, Safety Health and Environment Performance Management (SHE-PM), through which factories enter monthly their environmental information; in particular energy and refrigerants consumption data and which calculate corresp NA
7.1. Please provide your base year and base year emissions (Scopes 1 and 2)/7.1. Base year From Date:/To Date:/ Scope 1 Base year emissions (metric tonnes CO2e)/N39Scope 2 Base year emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) 2011-01-01/2011-12-31/3806467/3233547
7.2. Please give the name of the standard, protocol or methodology you have used to collect activity data and calculate Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions NA The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (Revised Edition) NA
7.3. Please give the source for the global warming potentials you have used Gas/Reference Other: CFC - 11/Other: IPCC First Assessment Report
7.4. Please give the emissions factors you have applied and their origin; alternatively, please attach an Excel spreadsheet with this data Fuel/Material/Energy/Emission Factor/Unit/Reference ///
8.1. Please select the boundary you are using for your Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas inventory NA Financial control NA Boundary used for Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas inventory during 2011-2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.2. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e NA Gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e for 2011 - 2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.2. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figures in metric tonnes CO2e 3706080
8.3. Please provide your gross global Scope 2 emissions figures in metric tonnes CO2e NA
8.4. Are there are any sources (e.g. facilities, specific GHGs, activities, geographies, etc.) of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions which are not included in your disclosure? NA Yes NA Proportion of Scope 1 emissions that are verified/assured for 2011 - 2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.4a Reporting Period From/To/Source/Scope/Explain why the source is excluded 1 Jan 2012/31 Dec 2012/Head Offices/Scope 1 and 2/Nestlé does not have a reporting system to track emissions from Head Offices yet, but we are in the process of implementing one. However, emissions from Head Offices are insignificant compared to Group emi
8.5 Reporting Period From/To/Please estimate the uncertainty of the total gross global Scope 1 and 2 emissions figures that you have supplied and specify the sources of uncertainty in your data gathering, handling and calculations/Scope 1 emissions 1 Jan 2012/31 Dec 2012/More than 2% but less than or equal to 5%/Other: Uncertainty in Data received/Data is manually entered in our tracking and reporting tool on a monthly basis. This involves the risk of human errors or unintended mistakes in the syste
8.6. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 1 emissions Third party verification or assurance complete Proportion of Scope 1 emissions that are verified/assured for 2011 - 2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.6a. Please indicate the proportion of your Scope 1 emissions that are verified/assured More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% More than 90% but less than or equal to 100%
8.6b Reporting Period From/To/Please provide further details of the verification/assurance undertaken, and attach the relevant statements: Type of verification or assurance/Attach the document No Response
2013 Performance Band E A A NA
2013 Score 0 100 100 NA
0. Attachments NA https://webadmin.cdproject.net/sites/2013/42/12942/Investor CDP 2013/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2013/Introduction/Corporate-Business-Principles-EN.pdf NA If you have not been presented with a sector module that you consider would be appropriate for your company to answer, please select the module below. If you wish to view the questions first, please see https://www.cdproject.net/en-US/Programmes/Pages/Mor
0. Further Information NA Please see attach:- The Nestlé Corporate Business Principles- The Nestlé Policy on Environmental Sustainability- 2012 Nestlé Integrated Annual Report Pack outlining the company’s performance last year and its future ambitions. The integrated full Annual R NA If you are in these sectors (according to the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS)), the corresponding sector modules will be marked as default options to your information request. If you want to query your classification, please email respond@c
0.1. Introduction - Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. NA • Nestlé is the world's leading Nutrition, Health and Wellness company. Nestlé is committed to increasing the nutritional value of our products while improving the taste. Nestlé achieves this through its brands and with initiatives like the Nutritional Co NA
0.1. Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. • Nestlé is the world's leading Nutrition, Health and Wellness company. Nestlé is committed to increasing the nutritional value of our products while improving the taste. Nestlé achieves this through its brands and with initiatives like the Nutritional Co
0.2. Please state the start and end date of the year for which you are reporting data. 2012-01-01
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
2.1. Are you able to identify which of your operations are located in water-stressed regions? No Response 4 answers 4 answers NA
0.4. Exclusions Are there any geographies, activities, facilities or types of water inputs/outputs within this boundary which are not included in your disclosure? NA Yes NA NA
2.2b. You may explain here why you are not able to identify which of your operations are located in regions subject to water stress or water-related risk and whether you have plans to explore this issue in the future No Response 3 answers 3 answers NA
0.4aList of Exclusions & Reason for Exclusions-Transparency & Reporting No Response Answered Answered NA
1.1. Does your company have a water policy, strategy or management plan? No Yes Yes NA
2.1bPlease list the water-stressed regions where you have operations and the percentage of your total operations in that area NA Australia/Sydney, Melbourne/1 – 10China/Shangai, Beijing/1 – 10France/Scattered locations across the country/1 – 10Israel/Scattered locations across the country/1 – 10Mexico/Jalisco, Querétaro, Puebla, México/1 – 10South Africa/Gauteng, Free State, Wester NA NA
2.1bPlease list the water-stressed regions where you have operations and the percentage of your total operations in that area-Transparency & Reporting No Response 4 answers 4 answers NA
2.2. Do you use other indicators (besides water stress) to identify operations which are located in regions subject to water-related risk? NA NA NA NA
0.1. Introduction Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. NA • Nestlé is the world's leading Nutrition, Health and Wellness company. Nestlé is committed to increasing the nutritional value of our products while improving the taste. NA NA
0.2. Reporng Year Please state the start and end date of the year for which you are reporting data. 2.0. Enter the period that will be disclosed. NA 01-01-2011 - 31-12-2011 NA NA
0.3. Reporting Boundary Please indicate the category that describes the company, entities, or group for which you are reporting. NA Companies, entities or groups over which financial control is exercised. NA NA
2.3. Please specify the total percentage of your operations that are located in the regions at risk which you identified in questions 2.1 and/or 2.2 NA Yes NA NA
2.4. Please specify the basis you use to calculate the percentages used for questions 2.1 and/or 2.2 NA Other NA NA
1.1a. Please describe your policy, strategy or plan, including the highest level of responsibility for it within your company and its geographical reach-Transaprency & Reporting Australia/CCA's Water Policy covers all aspects of water related operations activities from both municipal and groundwater sources across the beverage and food businesses. Global/The Nestlé Water Policy includes the following: 1. Water is essential for nutrition. Nestlé Waters, the water business of Nestlé, provides a wide range of safe, wholesome and convenient bottled waters of high quality to meet the increasing and var United States of America/We have a philosophy to limit water waste and a strategy to identify reduction opportunities from development through operations through supply chain. We build our stores to green building standards (LEED and Green Globes), and e NA
1.1b. Does the policy, strategy or plan specify water reduction, quality or efficiency targets or other water-related goals? NA Global NA NA
1.1bDoes the water policy, strategy or plan specify water-related targets or goals? No Yes Yes NA
0.4aList of Exclusions & Reason for Exclusions NA Head Offices/Nestlé doesn't consolidate at global level the water consumption in its Head Offices. We have already started the process of implementation of a new consolidation system that will include Head Offices., R&D/Nestlé doesn't consolidate at globa NA NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
0.2. Reporting Year 2012-01-01
0.3. Reporting Boundary Companies, entities or groups over which financial control is exercised
0.4. Are there any geographies, activities, facilities or types of water inputs/outputs within this boundary which are not included in your disclosure? Yes
0.4a. List of Exclusions & Reason for Exclusions-Transparency & Reporting 2 answers
0.4a. List of Exclusions & Reason for Exclusions-Transparency & Reporting (value) #NAME?
1.1. Does your company have a water policy, strategy or management plan? No Yes Yes
1.1a. Please describe your policy, strategy or plan, including the highest level of responsibility for it within your company and its geographical reach-Transaprency & Reporting Australia/CCA's Water Policy covers all aspects of water related operations activities from both municipal and groundwater sources across the beverage and food businesses. NA United States of America/We have a philosophy to limit water waste and a strategy to identify reduction opportunities from development through operations through supply chain. We build our stores to green building standards (LEED and Green Globes), and e
1.1a. Please describe your policy, strategy or plan, including the highest level of responsibility for it within your company and its geographical reach-Transaprency & Reporting (value) NA
1.1b. Does the water policy, strategy or plan specify water-related targets or goals? Yes
1.1c. Description of Target/goal, its type and geographical reach -Transparency & Reporting 2 answers
1.1c. Description of Target/goal, its type and geographical reach -Transparency & Reporting (value) #NAME?
1.1d. You may explain here why your company does not have a water policy, strategy or plan and if you intend to put one in place. NA
1.2. What specific actions has your company taken to manage water resources or engage stakeholders in water-related issues and what are their outcomes?-Transparency & Reporting 2 answers
1.2. What specific actions has your company taken to manage water resources or engage stakeholders in water-related issues and what are their outcomes?-Transparency & Reporting (value) #NAME?
2.1. Are any of your operations located in water-stressed regions? Yes
2.1a. Please specify the method(s) you use to characterize water-stressed regions- Environmental policy & Reporting Other
2.1a. Please specify the method(s) you use to characterize water-stressed regions- Environmental policy & Reporting (value) #NAME?
2.1b. Please list the water-stressed regions where you have operations and the percentage of your total operations in that area-Transparency & Reporting 2 answers
2.1b. Please list the water-stressed regions where you have operations and the percentage of your total operations in that area-Transparency & Reporting (value) #NAME?
2.2. Are there other indicators (besides water stress) which you wish to report that help you to identify which of your operations are located in regions subject to water-related risk? Yes
2.2a. Please list the relevant risk indicator of your total operations in that area-Environment Policy and Reporting #NAME?
2.2b. You may explain here why you do not wish to report or why you do not use other indicators to identify which of your operations are located in regions subject to water-related risk. NA
2.3. Please specify the total proportion of your operations that are located in the regions at risk which you identified in questions 2.1 and/or 2.2. 0 40 99
2.4. The basis to use to calculate the percentages used for questions 2.1 and/or 2.2 2 answers
2.4. The basis to use to calculate the percentages used for questions 2.1 and/or 2.3 (value) #NAME?
2.5. Do any of your key inputs or raw materials (excluding water) come from regions subject to water-related risk? Yes
2.5a. Please state or estimate the percentage of your key water-intensive inputs (excluding water) that come from these regions-Transparency & Reporting #NAME?
2.5b. You may explain here why you are not able to identify if any of your key inputs or raw materials come from regions subject to water-related risk and whether you have plans to explore this issue in the future. NA
3.1. Is your company exposed to water-related risks (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure? Yes
3.1a. Please describe the current and/or future risks to your operations, the ways in which these risks affect or could affect your operations and your current or proposed strategies for managing them-Transparency & Reporting 3 answers
3.1a. Please describe the current and/or future risks to your operations, the ways in which these risks affect or could affect your operations and your current or proposed strategies for managing them-Transparency & Reporting (value) #NAME?
3.1b. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to any water-related risks that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure. NA
3.1c. Please explain why you do not know if your company is exposed to any water-related risks that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure, and your plans to assess this risk in the future. NA
3.2. Country or geographical scale-Environment Policy & Reporting Facility
3.2. What methodology do you use to analyze water-related risk across your operations?-Transparency & Reporting Answered
3.2. What methodology do you use to analyze water-related risk across your operations? WWF/DEG Water Risk Filter; close cooperation with WWF (World Wide Fund for Nature). In previous years also WBCSD Global Water Tool.
3.3. Do you require your key suppliers to report on their water use, risks and management? Yes
3.4. Is your supply chain exposed to water-related risks (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure? Yes
3.4b. Please explain why you do not consider your supply chain to be exposed to any water-related risks that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure. NA
3.4c. Please explain why you do not know if your supply chain is exposed to water-related risks that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure, and your plans to assess this risk in the future. NA
4.1. Has your business experienced any detrimental impacts related to water in the past five years? Yes
4.1. Please describe any detrimental impacts to business related to water your company has faced in the past five years, their financial impacts and whether they have resulted in any changes to company practices- Transparency & Reporting Answered
5.1. Do water-related issues present opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure? Yes
5.1a. Please describe the current and/or future opportunities, the ways in which these opportunities affect or could affect your operations and your current or proposed strategies for exploiting them-Environmental Policy & Reporting 3 answers
5.1a. Please describe the current and/or future opportunities, the ways in which these opportunities affect or could affect your operations and your current or proposed strategies for exploiting them-Environmental Policy & Reporting (value) #NAME?
5.1b. Please explain why you do not consider water-related issues to present opportunities to your company that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure or supply chain. NA
5.1c. Please explain why you do not know whether water-related issues present opportunities to your company that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure. NA
6.1. Has your company identified any linkages or trade-offs between water and carbon emissions in its operations or supply chain? Yes
6.1a. Please describe the linkages or trade-offs between water and carbon emissions in its operations or supply chain?--Transparency & Reporting 2 answers
6.1a. Please describe the linkages or trade-offs and the related management policy or action between water and carbon emissions in its operations or supply chain?-Transparency & Reporting (value) #NAME?
7.1. Are you able to provide data, whether measured or estimated, on water withdrawals within your operations? Yes
7.1a. Please report the water withdrawals within your operations for the reporting year-Transparency & Reporting 0
7.1a. Please report the water withdrawals within your operations for the reporting year-Transparency & Reporting (value) 0
7.1b. Please explain why you are not able to provide data for water withdrawals. NA
7.2. Are you able to provide data, whether measured or estimated, on water recycling/reuse within your operations? Yes
7.2a. Please report the water recycling/reuse within your operations for the reporting year-Transparency & Reporting 3 answers
7.2a. Please report the water recycling/reuse within your operations for the reporting year-Transparency & Reporting (value) #NAME?
7.2b. Please explain why you are not able to provide data for water recycling/reuse within your operations. NA
7.2b. Please explain why you are not able to provide data for water recycling/reuse within your operations-Transparency & Reporting No Response
7.3. Please use this space to describe the methodologies used for questions 7.1 and 7.2 or to report withdrawals or recycling/reuse in a different format to that set out above. Water withdrawal is the sum of water used by the plant from all sources, including purchases from suppliers as well as surface, ground or rain water sources. This includes water that may be treated through industrial services (such as softening and demine
7.3. Please use this space to describe the methodologies used for questions 7.1 and 7.2 or to report withdrawals or recycling/reuse in a different format to that set out above-Transparency & Reporting Answered
7.4. Are any water sources significantly affected by your company's withdrawal of water? No
7.4a. Please list any water sources significantly affected by your company's withdrawal of water. NA
7.4b. You may explain here why your company's withrawal of water does not significantly affect any water sources. As part of The Nestlé Policy on Environmental Sustainability, water preservation is one of the key focus area. We work to reduce the amount of water withdrawn per kilo of product; assure that our activities respect local water resources and we take care t
7.4b. You may explain here why your company's withrawal of water does not significantly affect any water sources-Transparency & reporting Answered
7.4c. Please explain why you do not know if any water sources are significantly affected by your company's withdrawal of water. NA
8.1. Are you able to identify discharges of water from your operations by destination, by treatment method and by quantity and quality using standard effluent parameters? Yes
8.1a. Please explain why you are not able to identify discharges from your operations by destination, treatment method , quantity and quality, and whether you have any plans to put in place systems that would enable you to do so. NA NA
8.2. Did your company pay any penalties or fines for significant breaches of discharge agreements or regulations in the reporting period? No NA
8.2a. Please describe the quality, quantity and destination of the water that was the subject of the significant breach(es), the associated fines and any actions taken to minimise the risk of future non-compliance NA NA
8.3. Are any water bodies and related habitats significantly affected by discharges of water or runoff from your operations? No NA
8.3a. Please list any water bodies and related habitats which are significantly affected by discharge of water or runoff from your operations NA NA
8.3b. You may explain here why your company's discharge of water does not significantly affect any water bodies or associated habitats. The Nestlé Corporate Business Principles and The Nestlé Policy on Environmental Sustainability commit the Company to respect and comply with existing laws and regulations concerning the environment in local markets, and to apply Nestlé internal standards NA
8.3b. You may explain here why your company's discharge of water does not significantly affect any water bodies or related habitats-Tansparency & Reporting Answered NA
8.3c. Please explain why you do not know if any water bodies and associated habitats are significantly affected by discharge of water or runoff from your operations. NA NA
9.1. Please provide any available financial intensity values for your company's water use across its operations 3 answers NA
9.1. Please provide any available financial intensity values for your company's water use across its operations (value) #NAME? NA
9.2. Please provide any available water intensity values for your company's products or services across its operations. #NAME? NA
Please enter the name of the individual that has signed off (approved) the response and their job title Pascal Gréverath, Nestlé AVP, Head of Environmental Sustainability NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Type of Member Company
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Reduce 0 37 52 NA
Report 0 11 12 NA
Review 0 21 27 NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Rank by Context-Based Score (1 to 100) 100 77 1 Climate counts rank
Sustainable N N Y If a company has a score of less than or equal to one (?1), it is considered “sustainable”, whereas a company with a score greater than one (>1) is considered “unsustainable”
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
2011 Electricity Usage /MWh 35 37333332 272242310 Annual electricity consumption resulting from all operations within the defined boundaries of a given organisation.
2011 Renewables Usage /MWh 5 4480556 20498400 Total number of MWh of electricity or proxy purchased globally from renewable energy power-generating projects directly or indirectly.
Biomass/Biofuel (%) 0 NA 100 Biomass = woody waste; agricultural crops or waste; animal and other organic waste; energy crops; co-firing of biomass in fossil fuel generation plants. Biofuel = biofuels such as bioethanol and biodiesel.
Blend (%) 0 NA 100 Blend = renewable electricity consisting of a mix of renewables as provided by for example third-party marketers.
Country Switzerland NA
Geothermal (%) 0 NA 79 Geothermal = all electricity from geothermal facilities.
Global CREX rank 1 167 280 The CREX participants are ranked based on the percentage of renewable electricity procured for their own use in 2011, calculated by dividing renewable electricity consumption by total electricity consumption for the period.
Hydro (%) 0 NA 100 Hydro = hydro projects from new generation capacity.
Sector Consumer Goods NA ICB system top-level industry designation (via the Bloomberg Terminal).
Solar (%) 0 NA 100 Solar = all electricity produced solar photovoltaics (PV) and solar thermal facilities.
Unknown (%) 0 NA 100
Waste to energy (%) 0 NA 100 Waste-to-energy = electricity using landfill gas or waste from other facilities such as wastewater treatment stations.
Wind (%) 0 NA 100 Wind = all electricity from wind turbines.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Reported Scope 3 Total (tCO2e) 670000000 2691264 0 Indicated the total reported Scope 3 (all other indirect emissions) of the company in metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent (tCO2e) as defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol. Where no Scope 3 emissions are reported, this is recorded as "No Data"
Scope 1+2 Intensity 11162.43 77.05 0.3 Intensity is calculated by adding together a company's Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions and dividing by its turnover.
Global 800 Carbon Rank 800 419 1 Carbon Ranking of 800 international companies. Ranking is determined by EIO Methodology. See Source Info sheet for comments on it
No. of Scope 3 Categories Reported 1 3 15 This column indicates the number of Scope 3 Categories reported. Once placed into one of the four Disclosure Categories, companies are ranked by the number of Scope 3 categories disclosed.
Reported Scope 1+2 Total (tCO2e) 282000000 7040000 843 The total reported Scope 1 (all direct emissions) and Scope 2 (indirect electricity emissions) of the company in metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent (tCO2e) as defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol
Accepted or Inferred Scope 3 Intensity 8547.13 856.03 64.51 Unless the company reports all 15 Scope 3 categories as defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Standard, an inferred figure based on the highest reported intensity for that sector, across the Global ET Universe, is shown
Category No Public Data Orange Public, Complete, and Verified data Companies are placed into one of four data or 'disclosure' categories: 1) Public, Complete, and Verified data; 2) Public, Complete, and Unverified data; 3) Public, Incomplete, Verified or Unverified data; 4) No Public Data
Combined Scope 1+2+3 Intensity 12161.68 505.06 34.24 Combined Scope 1+2_3 Intensity is calculated by adding together a company's Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions at 100% (disclosed or inferred) + 50% of Scope 3 emissions (disclosed or inferred).
Market Value ($Million) 1667.87 209972 358143.1 A company's market value, or market capitalism (number of shares times x share price). This value was taken on 23.08.2011
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Sum of Biogenic CO2 emissions 2.9 NA 23623772.5 Total biogenic CO2 emissions.
Sum of CO2 emissions (non-biogenic) 0.3 80528 53858607.2 Total non-biogenic CO2 emissions
Sum of Gases with No Listed GWP (metric tons) 0.3397 NA 1036.4
Sum of HFC emissions 2558.79 NA 19215.8
Sum of HFE emissions NA NA
Sum of Methane (CH4) emissions 0.21 32.13 2491216.14 Total methane emissions
Sum of NF3 emissions 5332 NA 21231.68
Sum of Nitrous Oxide (N2O) emissions 0.31 47.74 10675387.54
Sum of PFC emissions 33930.1 NA 1221318.27
Sum of SF6 emissions 4254.2 NA 153581.4
Total reported direct emissions 30.03 80607.87 54200390.452 Total emissions of CO2 and other gases in metric tons.
Industry Description NA NA Description of the type of industry the facility serves.
Is Some CO2 captured on-site and therefore not emitted? N NA Y Indicates if all CO2 is emitted or if some is sequestered.
Number of reporting facilities 1 2 50 Number of facilities reported to the EPA.
Percentage of facilities that emit pollutants 2 50 100 Percent of reporting facilities that emit pollutants other than CO2.
Percentage of facilities that employ continuous emissions monitoring 6 NA 100
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
CO2 Productivity 607.9556 13400.5683 5209401.5137 NA
Leadership Diversity 0 7.14285714285714E-02 0.5 NA
Rank 100 94 1 NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
CO2 Productivity 160.4713 13513.997 2435000 NA
Leadership Diversity 0 0.2143 0.5833 NA
Rank 100 86 1 NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Date Added To Sr List NA 41439.25 NA Date added to the GRI list.
Guidelines NA GRI - G3.1 NA This field indicates which version of the GRI Guidelines is used for the reporting. As of publication year 2009, GRI only includes reporting that makes use of the G3 Guidelines, which were released in October 2006.
Integrated No NA Yes GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
Publication Year 2013 GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
Region NA Europe NA Region the organization operates in.
Report Html Address NA http://www.nestle.com/csv NA URL of the report location.
Report Pdf Address NA http://www.nestle.com/asset-library/documents/library/documents/corporate_social_responsibility/nestle-csv-full-report-2012-en.pdf NA Location of a PDF version of the report.
Report Title NA Nestlé in Society: Creating Shared Value Report NA Title of the report.
Sector NA Food and Beverage Products NA Industry sector.
Sector Supplements (Final) NA Food Processing NA This field indicates if the reporting organization has made use of one of the final Sector Supplements and which one. If ‘not used’ is indicated, it means that one of the final Sector Supplements is applicable, but has not been used. If ‘not applicable’ i
Size NA MNE NA GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Guidelines NA GRI - G3.1 NA This field indicates which version of the GRI Guidelines is used for the reporting. As of publication year 2009, GRI only includes reporting that makes use of the G3 Guidelines, which were released in October 2006.
Integrated NA GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
Publication Year 2014 GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
Region NA Europe NA Region the organization operates in.
Report Html Address NA http://www.nestle.com/csv NA URL of the report location.
Report Pdf Address NA http://www.nestle.com/asset-library/documents/library/documents/corporate_social_responsibility/nestle-csv-full-report-2013-en.pdf NA Location of a PDF version of the report.
Report Title NA Nestlé in Society: Creating Shared Value and meeting our commitments 2013 NA Title of the report.
Sector NA Food and Beverage Products NA Industry sector.
Sector Supplements (Final) NA Food Processing NA This field indicates if the reporting organization has made use of one of the final Sector Supplements and which one. If ‘not used’ is indicated, it means that one of the final Sector Supplements is applicable, but has not been used. If ‘not applicable’ i
Size NA MNE NA GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Industry Packaged Foods and Meats The company's industry sector
Public Note NA Comments on any public note about the statement
Sector Consumer Staples The company's industry sector
Statement http://www.nestleusa.com/About-Us/Supply-Chains-Act.aspx The company's statement location
Statement--Trasparency No Yes Yes Companies with a posted statement addressing at least three of the five SB-657 requirements are awarded a check mark.
Website http://www.nestleusa.com The company's web site
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Envtl. Mgmt. 28.6 84.4 91.9 Based on an analysis of companies tracked in Sustainalytics’ Global Platform, the Environmental Management Score is an assessment of how a company manages its environmental performance through policies, programs, targets, certifications, and the like. To
Green Score 0 57.4 100 NA
Rank 500 289 1 NA
Disclosure 0 86.9 100 Environmental disclosure was included as a stand-alone score to assess each company’s transparency with regard to its environmental performance. Specifically, this score evaluates the breadth and quality of company environmen
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Carbon Productivity 0.015 0.407 0.963 GHG Productivity defined as Revenue ($US) / Total Greenhouse gas (GHG) Emissions (CO2e).
Energy Productivity 0.007 0.311 0.957 Energy Productivity defined as Revenue ($US) / Total Energy Consumption (GJ).
Newsweek Green Score 0.0 0.443 0.843 This score is derived from the following component scores: an Energy Productivity,Carbon Productivity, Water Productivity, Waste Productivity, Reputation, Pay Link, Sustainability Themed Committee, Audit ; weighted at 45 percent, 45 percent, and 10 percen
Pay Link No Yes Yes A mechanism to link the remuneration of any member of a company's senior executive team with the achievement of environmental performance targets.
Rank 500 201 1
Reputation 0.005 0.036 1 The Reputation score is made up of two components: (1) The RepRisk Index, which is a quantitative measure that captures criticism and quantifies a company exposure to ESG risks. (2) The second component is based on the number of environmental issues that
Sustainability Themed Committee No Yes Yes The existence of a committee at the Board of Directors level whose mandate is related to the sustainability of the company, including but not limited to environmental matters.
Waste Productivity 0.014 0.426 0.97 Waste Productivity is defined as Revenue ($US) / [Total waste generated (metric tonnes) – waste recycled/reused (metric tonnes)].
Water Productivity 0.012 0.432 0.992 Water Productivity is defined as Revenue ($US) / Total water use (m3).
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Corporate Governance 3 3 0 The scores for each ESG scope issue ranges from 0-3. The scoring refers to the number of times the company was criticized in relation to that scope issue: 0 = little or no exposure in the past 4 years; 1 = 5 direct relations in the past 4 years; 2 = 10 direct relations in the past 4 years; 3 = 20 direct relations in the past 4 years.
Current RRI 86 47 0 The RepRisk Index (RRI) is a quantitative risk measure that captures criticism and quantifies a company's exposure to controversial environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues. It does not measure a company's overall reputation, but rather is an indicator of their reputational risk.The Current RRI value indicates the current level of criticism about a company.
Employee Relations 3 3 0 The scores for each ESG scope issue ranges from 0-3. The scoring refers to the number of times the company was criticized in relation to that scope issue: 0 = little or no exposure in the past 4 years; 1 = 5 direct relations in the past 4 years; 2 = 10 direct relations in the past 4 years; 3 = 20 direct relations in the past 4 years.
Environmental FootPrint 3 3 0 The scores for each ESG scope issue ranges from 0-3. The scoring refers to the number of times the company was criticized in relation to that scope issue: 0 = little or no exposure in the past 4 years; 1 = 5 direct relations in the past 4 years; 2 = 10 direct relations in the past 4 years; 3 = 20 direct relations in the past 4 years.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Rank 400 212 1 REPORTWATCH RATING
Report Rating D B A REPORTWATCH RATING
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Value of USG Contracts (in millions) 990 1.2 1 Value of Iranian contracts.
Withdrawn NA Was the association with Iran withdrawn?
Nationality Switzerland Country the company is in.
On the list Yes Yes Is the company on the list.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
include_measurement 0 1 1 Does your COP identify targets, define performance indicators and measure outcomes?
references_anti_corruption 0 1 1 Does your COP contain description of actions, and when relevant policies, related to anti-corruption?
references_environment 0 1 1 Does your COP contain description of actions, and when relevant policies, related to the environment?
references_human_rights 0 1 1 Does your COP contain description of actions, and when relevant policies, related to human rights?
references_labour 0 1 1 Does your COP contain description of actions, and when relevant policies, related to labour rights?
starts_on NA 01/01/2012 NA Start Date
differentiation NA advanced NA At what level is the declarer?
ends_on NA 12/01/2012 NA End Date
format NA sustainability_report NA How is your COP shared with stakeholders?
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
ends_on NA 12/01/2013 NA End Date
format NA sustainability_report NA How is your COP shared with stakeholders?
include_continued_support_statement 0 1 1 Does your COP contain a statement by the CEO (or equivalent) expressing continued support for the Global Compact and renewing your company’s ongoing commitment to the initiative and its principles?
include_measurement 0 1 1 Does your COP identify targets, define performance indicators and measure outcomes?
references_anti_corruption 0 1 1 Does your COP contain description of actions, and when relevant policies, related to anti-corruption?
references_environment 0 1 1 Does your COP contain description of actions, and when relevant policies, related to the environment?
references_human_rights 0 1 1 Does your COP contain description of actions, and when relevant policies, related to human rights?
references_labour 0 1 1 Does your COP contain description of actions, and when relevant policies, related to labour rights?
starts_on NA 01/01/2013 NA Start Date
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
IT Rank 30 NA 1 The most attractive employers in the IT field.
World Business Council for Sustainable Development
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Strategic Partners Yes Yes Strategic Partners comprise some of the world’s leading corporate citizens and provide essential leadership in support of the Forum’s mission. Strategic Partners are a key force in our activities and communities at the global, regional and industry levels. They help shape our initiatives, projects and task forces and give intellectual guidance through the participation of their most senior executives on steering boards and in advisory groups. Their considerable financial support and in-kind services – including the provision of dedicated staff to assist with our operations – allow the Forum to deliver its programmes and advance worldwide economic and social progress.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Weighted score 1.2 2.5 5.9

Flags

(Other Indicators - things that don’t affect ratings but that help identify or classify companies)

SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
You have put report(s) in your cart
Go to my cart
Ok