CSRHub is the world’s largest CSR (corporate social responsibility) and sustainability ratings and information database.

NIPPON YUSEN KABUSHIKI KAISHA

Subscribe to see all available data

Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha (NYK) is a diversified global logistics company engaged in the international marine transportation business, cruises, terminal operations, harbor transport, shipping-related services, real estate, and others. NYK's fleet consists of over 800 ships. Headquartered in Tokyo, Japan, the Company has branch offices in Yokohama, Nagoya, Kansai, Kyushu, Japan, and Taipei, Taiwan.

Ticker: 9101-TO ISIN: JP3753000003
Address: 2-3-2 Marunouchi , Japan , Chiyoda-ku , TKY , 100-0005 Website: NIPPON YUSEN KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Phone #: 81-3-32845151 CSR Web Area: SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Basic Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Ratings

  Overall Community Employees Environment Governance
NIPPON YUSEN KABUSHIKI KAISHA 59 54 55 71 50
Airport, Harbor Operations, & Logistics
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Cruise Ship Operations
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Water Transportation
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
All company average 55 55 56 58 52
Japan
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Percentile Rankings

Rankings are in percentile terms, compared to other companies in the same industry and country Overall Community Employees Environment Governance
NIPPON YUSEN KABUSHIKI KAISHA 70% 44% 43% 89% 38%
Airport, Harbor Operations, & Logistics
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Cruise Ship Operations
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Water Transportation
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Japan
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Special Issues:

Ratings History

Only subscribers can interact with the graph.

More CSR Rating Details

  Community Employees
Community Dev & Philanthropy Product Human Rights & Supply Chain Compensation & Benefits Diversity & Labor Rights Training, Health & Safety
NIPPON YUSEN KABUSHIKI KAISHA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Airport, Harbor Operations, & Logistics
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Cruise Ship Operations
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Water Transportation
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
All company average 53 54 55 58 55 55
Japan
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Environment Governance
Energy & Climate Change Environmant Policy & Reporting Resource Management Board Leadership Ethics Transparency & Reporting
NIPPON YUSEN KABUSHIKI KAISHA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Airport, Harbor Operations, & Logistics
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Cruise Ship Operations
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Water Transportation
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
All company average 57 58 57 50 55 51
Japan
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Percentile rankings

Rankings are in percentile terms, compared to other companies in the same industry and country Community Employees
Community Dev & Philantrophy Product Human Rights & Supply Chain Compensation & Benefits Diversity & Labor Rights Training, Health & Safety
NIPPON YUSEN KABUSHIKI KAISHA 47% 78% 15% 12% 42% 84%
Airport, Harbor Operations, & Logistics
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Cruise Ship Operations
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Water Transportation
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Japan
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Environment Governance
Energy & Climate Change Environment Policy & Reporting Resource Management Board Leadership Ethics Transparency & Reporting
NIPPON YUSEN KABUSHIKI KAISHA 93% 88% 87% 20% 50% 76%
Airport, Harbor Operations, & Logistics
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Cruise Ship Operations
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Water Transportation
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Japan
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

0 Special Issues Affect This Company (see a list of issues here)

# of Sources
Airport, Harbor Operations, & Logistics
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Cruise Ship Operations
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Water Transportation
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Overall database
Japan
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

CSRHub Has 45 Data Sources (22 Are Currently Active) for This Company

= sources impacting the current ratings
= sources not impacting the current ratings, but included in earlier ratings for this company
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Original Data Values

(unsubscribed users can see the list, subscribers can see the data details for most sources)

Data source name

Data source element name Minimum value Value provided by datasource Maximum value Data description
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
annual_sales_local 286 15336360 2.407451E+11 NA
Emissions per assets 2.8321 0.0003 2.8387656764E-10 NA
Emissions per employee 235484.5 8.6818 0.073 NA
Emissions per sale 4.2576 0.0001 2.7756653992E-07 NA
emissions_total_tco2e 70790000 1910 9 NA
employees_total 1 220 508714 NA
Harzardous emitter? Yes No No NA
line_of_business Other transportation support activities NA
total_assets_local 1000 6554000 1.506867E+12 NA
waste_hazardous_kg 72001000 0 0 NA
waste_non_hazardous_kg 962755000 0 0 NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Brand Value / Enterprise Value (%) -48.164682123 0.2055 316.6056 NA
Brand Value 2012 3147.2041 NA
BSI 50 65.7671 88.4717 NA
Domicile JAPAN NA
Enterprise Value NA 15313.69 NA NA
Reviewed ? YES NA
Sector Industrial NA
Brand Finance 2012-13
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Brand Value 2013 11.095 3351.2684 67875.2014 NA
BSI 50 65.7671 89.6275 NA
Domicile JAPAN NA
Sector Industrial NA
Reviewed lw NA
Brand Rating 2013 BBB A+ AAA+ NA
Enterprise Value 2013 0 16274.6304 435750.9811
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
0. Further Information NA NA NA NA
0.1. Introduction - Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. NA Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha (NYK LINE) Global logistics based on international marine transportation business, cruises, terminal and harbor transport, shipping-related services, real estate, and others. NA NA
5.1e Identified climate change risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments? NA Yes NA NA
5.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA (i) We predicted the following financial implications of the regulations on our profit and loss if we were not to take the action recommended by a third-party:ID 1. Approx. JPY 63 billion yearly (= (the sales of the section of liner business 2010: JPY 462 NA NA
5.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
5.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
5.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
6. Attachments NA NA NA NA
6. Further Information NA NA NA NA
6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Opportunities driven by changes in regulation; Opportunities driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA NA
6.1a Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in regulation? NA Yes NA NA
6.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA (i) We predicted the following financial implications of the opportunities on our profit and loss if we were not to take the action recommended by a third-party: Approx. JPY 330 million (=JPY 20 million X 10% X 15 vessels) yearly. loss for an opportunity NA NA
6.1c Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in physical climate parameters? NA Yes NA NA
14. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/41/13341/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/14.EmissionsTrading/14.2 HAMA WING PROJECT.pdf NA NA
6.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA (i) We predicted the following financial implications of the estimated opportunities on our profit and loss if we were not to take the action recommended by a third-party:The loss of an opportunity of the fuel costs reduction: approx. JPY 4.8 billion year NA NA
6.1e Identified opportunities that are driven by changes in other climate-related developments? NA Yes NA NA
6.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA (i) We predicted the following financial implications of the estimated opportunities on our profit and loss if we were not to take the action recommended by a third-party:Approx. JPY 14 billion (=JPY 461 billion X 3%) yearly. loss for an opportunity of th NA NA
13. Attachments NA NA NA NA
11. Attachments NA NA NA NA
11. Further Information NA NA NA NA
11.1. Do you consider that the grid average factors used to report Scope 2 emissions in Question 8.3 reflect the contractual arrangements you have with electricity suppliers? NA No NA NA
11.1a. You may report a total contractual Scope 2 figure in response to this question. Please provide your total global contractual Scope 2 GHG emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 0 55475.14 17902000 NA
11.2. Has your organization retired any certificates, e.g. Renewable Energy Certificates, associated with zero or low carbon electricity within the reporting year or has this been done on your behalf? NA No NA NA
3.1e. Please explain (i) why not; and (ii) forecast how your emissions will change over the next five years NA NA NA NA
3.2. Does the use of your goods and/or services directly enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party? No Yes Yes NA
3.2a. Please provide details (see guidance) NA i. How the emissions are/were avoided; Marine transportation is one of the most environmentally friendly transportation modes, which can ship a large quantity of products at once. Generally speaking, air freight is 47 times more carbon-intensive than ocea NA NA
3.3c Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities. 0 1 12 NA
3.3c. What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities? NA Dedicated budget for energy efficiency NA NA
5. Attachments NA NA NA NA
5. Further Information NA 5.1b 1. Assumption of the amount of sales amount decreaseWhen, in the case of an energy saving non-correspondence-shaped ship, a new ship goes into service from Jan 2013 does approx. average 15 vessels yearly in a long-term plan. While sales per one vesse NA NA
5.1. Have you identified any climate change risks (current or future) that have potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Risks driven by changes in regulation; Risks driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA NA
5.1a Identified risks driven by changes in regulation? NA NA NA NA
5.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA (i) We predicted the following financial implications of the regulations on our profit and loss if we were not to take the action recommended by a third-party: ID 1. Approx. JPY 20 billion loss per year of sales. (Supposed new-built vessels 15 / year in t NA NA
14. Further Information NA 14.2a (1) NYK has decided to participate in Yokohama city's ongoing project for large-scale wind-power generation as part of the city's efforts to promote an environmentally friendly power option. We support this project as our social contribution activit NA NA
1.1. Where is the highest level of direct responsibility for climate change within your company? No individual or committee with overall responsibility for climate change Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board NA
1.1a. Please identify the position of the individual or name of the committee with this responsibility NA “Safety & Environmental Management Committee” At the Tokyo headquarters, we have established the Safety & Environmental Management Committee (SEMC), which consists of a chairman (the company president), an executive chief of environmental management (one NA NA
1.2. Do you provide incentives for the management of climate change issues, including the attainment of targets? No Yes Yes NA
13. Further Information NA NA NA NA
13.1. How do your absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year compare to the previous year? Increased Decreased Decreased NA
13.1a (i) If absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) have increased, decreased or remained the same overall compared to the previous year, state direction of change NA General Decrease NA NA
13.1a (ii) If absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) have increased, decreased or remained the same overall compared to the previous year, state the reason for the direction of change NA Decrease: Emissions reduction activities NA NA
13.1a (iii) If emissions have increased, decreased or remained the same overall, provide the emissions value (%) NA Decrease: , Increase: 18.13 , Emission value for which direction is not stated: NA NA
2012 Score 0 95 100 NA
2012 Performance Band E A A NA
2.3a. Please explain (i) the engagement process and (ii) actions you are advocating NA (1-i) Engagement process1-i-i. Method of engagement;Through Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, The Japanese Shipowners’ Association and Japan Ship Technology Research Association.1-i-ii. Topic of engagement;International regulations NA NA
8.8. Are carbon dioxide emissions from the combustion of biologically sequestered carbon (i.e. carbon dioxide emissions from burning biomass/biofuels) relevant to your company? No No Yes NA
8.8a. Please provide the emissions in metric tonnes CO2e 0.01 NA 27263000 NA
Management 4. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/41/13341/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/4.Communication/CSR REPORT 2011_P4_5.pdf NA NA
Management 4. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? NA 7 NA NA
5.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA (i) We predicted the following financial implications of the regulations on our profit and loss if we were not to take the action recommended by a third-party:ID 1. Approx. JPY 9 billion / year of loss on the bottom line. (According to “Climate Change and NA NA
2. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/41/13341/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/2.Strategy/2.3 Research and Development.pdf NA NA
2. Further Information NA NA NA NA
5.1c Identified climate change risks driven by change in physical climate parameters? NA Yes NA NA
2.1. Please select the option that best describes your risk management procedures with regard to climate change risks and opportunities NA Integrated into multi-disciplinary company wide risk management processes NA NA
2.1a. Please provide further details (see guidance) NA (i) the scope of the process; The following risks and opportunities:1. Regulations for shipping, terminal, and logistics businesses;2. Changes in customers’ needs;3. Social reputation; and4. Climate changes. (ii) how risks/opportunities are assessed at NA NA
2.2. Is climate change integrated into your business strategy? No Yes Yes NA
2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes (see guidance) NA (i) How the business strategy has been influenced; Our objectives are to achieve 10% improvement in the GHG emissions’ factor of ships “by FY2013 from FY2006 levels” and “by FY2015 from FY2010 levels.” To fulfill our objectives, our board of directors has NA NA
2.2b. Please explain why not NA NA NA NA
2.3. Do you engage with policy makers to encourage further action on mitigation and/or adaptation? No Yes Yes NA
3. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/41/13341/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/3.TargetsandInitiatives/Shipping Efficiency_EDF.pdf NA NA
3. Further Information NA 3.1a NYK have many new projects for GHG reduction, but most of them were started in recent years. so it is difficult to indicate the annual CO2 savings because they are only trial period. We try to indicate the amount of CO2 savings next year. [Project NA NA
3.1. Did you have an emissions reduction target that was active (ongoing or reached completion) in the reporting year? No Absolute and intensity targets Absolute and intensity targets NA
14.1. Do you participate in any emission trading schemes? No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next two years Yes Yes NA
14.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? No Yes Yes NA
6.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
6.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
6.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
7. Attachments NA NA NA NA
7. Further Information NA IMO guideline: IMO MEPC (Maritime Environment Protection Committee).1 / Circ. 684. “GUIDELINES FOR VOLUNTARY USE OF THE SHIP ENERGY EFFICIENCY OPERATIONAL INDICATOR (EEOI)” is used to calculate the GHG emissions from operating vessels. “GHG emissions from NA NA
7.1. Please provide your base year and base year emissions (Scopes 1 and 2) NA NA NA NA
0.4. Currency selection Please select the currency in which you would like to submit your response. All financial information contained in the response should be in this currency. NA JPY(¥) NA NA
1. Attachments NA NA NA NA
1. Further Information NA NA NA NA
8.7. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 2 emissions More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% NA
11.1b. Explain the basis of the alternative figure (see guidance) (1) Hama Wing(wind power generation of Yokohama-city) generation of electricity : 2,161,352kWh (2) Electricity suppliers factors : TOKYO ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY0.000375 t-CO2/kWh(3) Emissions by Hama Wing(assumption) : 810.51 t-CO2/kWh(4) Reported Scope 2 NA
14.1b. What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? Tokyo Cap-and-Trade consists of the “First CO2 reduction period” and “Second CO2 reduction period”. Because we could achieve a major reduction against the first period mandate target, we will use the excess allowance on second period. Now we don’t decide NA
8.1. Please select the boundary you are using for your Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas inventory NA Financial control NA NA
8.2a. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 92 20328479.58 231902967 NA
8.3a. Please provide your gross global Scope 2 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 293 56285.65 8071070 NA
8.4. Are there are any sources (e.g. facilities, specific GHGs, activities, geographies, etc.) of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions which are not included in your disclosure? NA Yes NA NA
8.6. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 1 emissions More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% NA More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
8.8a. Please provide the emissions in metric tonnes CO2e 0.05 NA 13638000
0.4. Currency selection Please select the currency in which you would like to submit your response. All financial information contained in the response should be in this currency. JPY(¥)
0.6. Modules NA As part of the Investor CDP information request, electric utilities, companies with electric utility activities or assets, companies in the automobile or auto component manufacture sectors and companies in the oil and gas industry should complete suppleme
1. Attachments NA NA NA
1. Further Information NA NA NA
1.1. Where is the highest level of direct responsibility for climate change within your company? No individual or committee with overall responsibility for climate change Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board
1.2. Do you provide incentives for the management of climate change issues, including the attainment of targets? No Yes Yes
11. Attachments NA NA NA
11. Further Information NA NA NA
11.1. What percentage of your total operational spend in the reporting year was on energy? More than 0% but less than or equal to 5% More than 15% but less than or equal to 20% More than 95% but less than or equal to 100%
12. Attachments NA
12. Further Information NA
12.1. How do your absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year compare to the previous year? Decreased
12.1a Reason of change Emissions reduction activities, Divestment, Acquisitions, Mergers, Change in output, Change in methodology, Change in boundary, Change in physical operating conditions, Unidentified, Other
14. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/sites/2013/41/13341/Investor CDP 2013/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2013/13.EmissionsTrading/13.2 YOKOHAMA (Hama Wing).pdf NA
14. Further Information NA Please find attachment of YOKOHAMA Wind power project and CDM Projct No.0243. NA
14.1. Do you participate in any emission trading schemes? No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next two years Yes Yes
14.1b. What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? Tokyo’s cap-and-trade consists of a “first CO2 reduction period” and a “second CO2 reduction period”. Because we could achieve a major reduction during the first period mandate target, we will use the excess allowance in the second period.We have not deci
14.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? No Yes Yes
2. Attachments NA NA NA
2. Further Information NA NA NA
2.1. Please select the option that best describes your risk management procedures with regard to climate change risks and opportunities NA Integrated into multi-disciplinary company wide risk management processes NA
2.1a. Please provide further details (see guidance) NA (i)the scope of the process Following risks and opportunities are the scope of the process. 1. Regulations for shipping, terminal, logistics, and air-freighter businesses;2. Changes in customers’ needs;3. Social reputation; 4. Climate changes. (ii) how NA
2.2. Is climate change integrated into your business strategy? No Yes Yes
2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes (see guidance) NA (i)How the business strategy has been influenced; Our objectives are to achieve 10% improvement in the GHG emissions’ factor of ships “by FY2013 from FY2006 levels” and “by FY2015 from FY2010 levels.” To fulfill our objectives, our board of directors has NA
2.2b. Please explain why not NA NA NA
2.3. Do you engage in activities that could either directly or indirectly influence policy on climate change through any of the following? (tick all that apply) Yes
2.3a. Please explain (i) the engagement process and (ii) actions you are advocating NA NA NA
2.3b. Are you on the Board of any trade associations or provide funding beyond membership? Yes
2.3d. Do you publically disclose a list of all the research organizations that you fund? NA
3. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/sites/2013/41/13341/Investor CDP 2013/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2013/3.TargetsandInitiatives/3.2 Shipping Efficiency.pdf NA
3. Further Information NA Further information for 3.2a (1); Please refer to P.9/24 in attached "3.2 Shipping Efficiency.pdf" which describes using ship is efficient transportation mode. Further information for 3.2a(iii) Please refer to 3.2a(iii) nykgroup e-calculator.pdf which NA
3.1. Did you have an emissions reduction target that was active (ongoing or reached completion) in the reporting year? No Absolute and intensity targets Absolute and intensity targets
3.1e. Please explain (i) why not; and (ii) forecast how your emissions will change over the next five years NA NA NA
3.2. Does the use of your goods and/or services directly enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party? No Yes Yes
3.2a. Please provide details (see guidance) NA (i) How the emissions are/were avoided; Marine transportation is one of the most environmentally friendly transportation modes, which can ship a large quantity of products at once. Generally speaking, air freight is 47 times more carbon-intensive than oce NA
3.3c Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities. 0 1 13 Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities.
3.3c. What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities? NA Dedicated budget for energy efficiency NA
4. Attachments NA
4. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? - Further Information NA
4.1. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? 8 The number of corporate annual reports and voluntary publications (complete and/or underway) made about the company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance
5. Attachments NA NA NA
5. Further Information NA NA NA
5.1. Have you identified any climate change risks (current or future) that have potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Risks driven by changes in regulation; Risks driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA
5.1a. Climate change risks driven by changes in regulation Yes
5.1c. Climate change risks driven by change in physical climate parameters Yes
5.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA (i)potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; We predicted the following financial implications of the regulations on our profit and loss if we were not to take the action recommended by a third party:Approx. Yen 1.2 billion / year NA
5.1e.Climate change risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments Yes
5.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA (i)the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; We predicted the following financial implications of the regulations on our profit and loss if we were not to take the action recommended by a third-party:Approx. Yen 22 billion yea NA
5.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
5.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
5.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
6. Attachments NA NA NA
6. Further Information NA NA NA
6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Opportunities driven by changes in regulation; Opportunities driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA
6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? -Transparency Yes
6.1a Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in regulation? NA Yes NA
6.1c. Please describe the opportunities that are driven by changes in physical climate parameters Yes
6.1e. Please describe the opportunities that are driven by changes in other climate-related developments Yes
6.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA (i)the potential financial implications of the opportunity We predicted the following financial implications of the estimated opportunities on our profit and loss if we were not to take the action recommended by a third-party:Approx. Yen 13 billion (=Yen NA
6.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
6.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
6.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
7. Attachments NA NA NA
7. Further Information NA NA NA
8.1. Please select the boundary you are using for your Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas inventory NA Equity share NA Boundary used for Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas inventory during 2011-2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.2. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 20181796.11 Gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e for 2011 - 2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.3. Please provide your gross global Scope 2 emissions figures in metric tonnes CO2e 68953.61
8.4. Are there are any sources (e.g. facilities, specific GHGs, activities, geographies, etc.) of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions which are not included in your disclosure? NA Yes NA Proportion of Scope 1 emissions that are verified/assured for 2011 - 2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
2013 Performance Band E A- A NA
2013 Score 0 98 100 NA
0. Attachments NA NA NA If you have not been presented with a sector module that you consider would be appropriate for your company to answer, please select the module below. If you wish to view the questions first, please see https://www.cdproject.net/en-US/Programmes/Pages/Mor
0. Further Information NA NA NA If you are in these sectors (according to the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS)), the corresponding sector modules will be marked as default options to your information request. If you want to query your classification, please email respond@c
0.1. Introduction - Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. NA Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha(NYK LINE) Global logistics based on international marine transportation business, cruises, terminal and harbor transport, shipping-related services, real estate, and others. NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Description NA Description of the company's product.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Glassdoor
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
ceo:numberOfRatings 1 13 4026 The number of ratings of the CEO
ceo:pctApprove 0 92 100 Percent of ratings of the CEO that were approving
ceo:title NA The title of the company's CEO
employer:numberOfRatings 1 21 6549 The number of Glassdoor users who have rated this company as a place to work.
Glassdoor Employer Ratings 1 3.5 5 The Top Companies for Work-Life Balance list is based on employee feedback shared in company reviews on Glassdoor.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Report reference ISO Standards? NA No NA NA
Sector NA Technology Hardware NA NA
Country (HQ) NA United States of America NA NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Guidelines NA GRI - G3.1 NA This field indicates which version of the GRI Guidelines is used for the reporting. As of publication year 2009, GRI only includes reporting that makes use of the G3 Guidelines, which were released in October 2006.
Integrated No Yes Yes GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
Publication Year 2013 GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
Region NA Asia NA Region the organization operates in.
Report Html Address NA NA NA URL of the report location.
Report Pdf Address NA http://www.nyk.com/english/ir/library/nyk/pdf/2013_nykreport_all.pdf NA Location of a PDF version of the report.
Report Title NA CSR Report 2013 NA Title of the report.
Sector NA Logistics NA Industry sector.
Sector Supplements (Final) NA Not Applicable NA This field indicates if the reporting organization has made use of one of the final Sector Supplements and which one. If ‘not used’ is indicated, it means that one of the final Sector Supplements is applicable, but has not been used. If ‘not applicable’ i
Size NA MNE NA GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Corporate Governance 3 0 0 The scores for each ESG scope issue ranges from 0-3. The scoring refers to the number of times the company was criticized in relation to that scope issue: 0 = little or no exposure in the past 4 years; 1 = 5 direct relations in the past 4 years; 2 = 10 direct relations in the past 4 years; 3 = 20 direct relations in the past 4 years.
Current RRI 86 16 0 The RepRisk Index (RRI) is a quantitative risk measure that captures criticism and quantifies a company's exposure to controversial environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues. It does not measure a company's overall reputation, but rather is an indicator of their reputational risk.The Current RRI value indicates the current level of criticism about a company.
Employee Relations 3 0 0 The scores for each ESG scope issue ranges from 0-3. The scoring refers to the number of times the company was criticized in relation to that scope issue: 0 = little or no exposure in the past 4 years; 1 = 5 direct relations in the past 4 years; 2 = 10 direct relations in the past 4 years; 3 = 20 direct relations in the past 4 years.
Environmental FootPrint 3 0 0 The scores for each ESG scope issue ranges from 0-3. The scoring refers to the number of times the company was criticized in relation to that scope issue: 0 = little or no exposure in the past 4 years; 1 = 5 direct relations in the past 4 years; 2 = 10 direct relations in the past 4 years; 3 = 20 direct relations in the past 4 years.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Value of USG Contracts (in millions) 990 NA 1 Value of Iranian contracts.
Withdrawn NA Was the association with Iran withdrawn?
Nationality Japan Country the company is in.
On the list Yes Yes Is the company on the list.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
include_continued_support_statement 0 1 1 NA
additional_questions 0 1 1 NA
cop_web_link NA http://www.unglobalcompact.org/COPs/detail/18435 NA NA
created_at NA 39717.2216 NA NA
differentiation NA advanced NA NA
ends_on NA 39691 NA NA
include_measurement 0 1 1 NA
meets_advanced_criteria 0 1 1 NA
method_shared NA all NA NA
references_anti_corruption 0 1 1 NA
references_environment 0 1 1 NA
references_human_rights 0 1 1 NA
references_labour 0 1 1 NA
starts_on NA 39325 NA NA
title NA Communication on Progress 2012 NA NA
updated_at NA 39717.2216 NA NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
include_measurement 0 1 1 Does your COP identify targets, define performance indicators and measure outcomes?
references_anti_corruption 0 1 1 Does your COP contain description of actions, and when relevant policies, related to anti-corruption?
references_environment 0 1 1 Does your COP contain description of actions, and when relevant policies, related to the environment?
references_human_rights 0 1 1 Does your COP contain description of actions, and when relevant policies, related to human rights?
references_labour 0 1 1 Does your COP contain description of actions, and when relevant policies, related to labour rights?
starts_on NA 09/01/2012 NA Start Date
differentiation NA advanced NA At what level is the declarer?
ends_on NA 12/01/2013 NA End Date
format NA sustainability_report NA How is your COP shared with stakeholders?
You have put report(s) in your cart
Go to my cart
Ok