CSRHub is the world’s largest CSR (corporate social responsibility) and sustainability ratings and information database.

Infosys is a provider of IT solutions and Technology and Business Process Outsourcing in India. The company was founded in 1981 and, together with its subsidiaries, employs over 100,000 people worldwide. Infosys' offerings span business and technology consulting, application services, systems integration, product engineering, custom software development, maintenance, re-engineering, independent testing and validation services, IT infrastructure services and business process outsourcing. The company maintains 50 offices and development centers in India, China, Australia, the Czech Republic, Poland, the UK, Canada and Japan.

Ticker: INFY ISIN: INE009A01021
Address: Plot No. 44 & 97A Electronic City Hosur Road , India , Bangalore , , 560 100 Website: Infosys Technologies
Phone #: 91-80-28520261 CSR Web Area: SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Basic Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Ratings

  Overall Community Employees Environment Governance
Infosys Technologies 60 63 57 60 60
IT & Network Services
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
All company average 55 55 56 58 52
India
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Percentile Rankings

Rankings are in percentile terms, compared to other companies in the same industry and country Overall Community Employees Environment Governance
Infosys Technologies 75% 82% 51% 55% 75%
IT & Network Services
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
India
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Special Issues:

Ratings History

Only subscribers can interact with the graph.

More CSR Rating Details

  Community Employees
Community Dev & Philanthropy Product Human Rights & Supply Chain Compensation & Benefits Diversity & Labor Rights Training, Health & Safety
Infosys Technologies
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
IT & Network Services
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
All company average 53 54 55 58 55 55
India
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Environment Governance
Energy & Climate Change Environmant Policy & Reporting Resource Management Board Leadership Ethics Transparency & Reporting
Infosys Technologies
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
IT & Network Services
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
All company average 57 58 57 50 55 51
India
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Percentile rankings

Rankings are in percentile terms, compared to other companies in the same industry and country Community Employees
Community Dev & Philantrophy Product Human Rights & Supply Chain Compensation & Benefits Diversity & Labor Rights Training, Health & Safety
Infosys Technologies 84% 81% 78% 50% 65% 40%
IT & Network Services
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
India
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Environment Governance
Energy & Climate Change Environment Policy & Reporting Resource Management Board Leadership Ethics Transparency & Reporting
Infosys Technologies 64% 52% 55% 61% 76% 89%
IT & Network Services
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
India
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

0 Special Issues Affect This Company (see a list of issues here)

# of Sources
IT & Network Services
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Overall database
India
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

CSRHub Has 43 Data Sources (26 Are Currently Active) for This Company

= sources impacting the current ratings
= sources not impacting the current ratings, but included in earlier ratings for this company
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Original Data Values

(unsubscribed users can see the list, subscribers can see the data details for most sources)

Data source name

Data source element name Minimum value Value provided by datasource Maximum value Data description
Brand Finance 2011-12
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Brand Value / Enterprise Value (%) -48.164682123 0.1285 316.6056 NA
Brand Value 2012 3627.5681 NA
BSI 50 64.2869 88.4717 NA
Domicile INDIA NA
Enterprise Value NA 28238.51 NA NA
Reviewed ? YES NA
Sector Technology NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Brand Value 2013 11.095 2206.0678 67875.2014 NA
BSI 50 64.2869 89.6275 NA
Domicile INDIA NA
Sector Technology NA
Reviewed SJD - Locked NA
Brand Rating 2013 BBB AA- AAA+ NA
Enterprise Value 2013 0 19784.6077 435750.9811
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Brand Value 2014 10 2206.0678 87304 A brand strength is assessed by using our Brand Strength Index framework. This benchmarks the strength, risk and future potential of a brand relative to its competitors by assessing input measures, brand equity measures, and output performance across four
BSI 51.3 66 94.2 NA
Domicile INDIA NA
Sector Technology NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
0. Further Information NA NA NA NA
0.1. Introduction - Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. NA Infosys Limited (NASDAQ: INFY) is a global leader in consulting, technology and outsourcing with revenues of US$ 6.994 billion (FY12). Infosys provides business consulting, technology, engineering and outsourcing services to help clients in over 30 countr NA NA
5.1e Identified climate change risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments? NA Yes NA NA
5.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA Financial impacts are mainly from loss of business revenue, market capitalization and other social drivers. To manage these risks, we have identified climate change as one of the business risks and have integrated our sustainability goals into our corpor NA NA
5.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
5.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
5.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
6. Attachments NA NA NA NA
6. Further Information NA NA NA NA
6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Opportunities driven by changes in regulation NA NA
6.1a Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in regulation? NA Yes NA NA
6.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA Green innovation in business and manufacturing processes; operations; supply chains and business models to drive significant progress towards sustainability are being considered as one of the new growth engines for Infosys. We have managed to invested NA NA
6.1c Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in physical climate parameters? NA No NA NA
14. Attachments NA NA NA NA
6.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA NA NA NA
6.1e Identified opportunities that are driven by changes in other climate-related developments? NA No NA NA
6.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA NA NA NA
13. Attachments NA NA NA NA
11. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/80/9080/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/11.EmissionsScope2Contractual/Agreement with KERC.pdf NA NA
11. Further Information NA In FY 2011-12 we procured about 48 million units of renewable power mainly from wind and mini-hydro plants in the state of Karnataka through open sourcing. As per Indian government regulations, we are not eligible to acquire renewable energy certificates NA NA
11.1. Do you consider that the grid average factors used to report Scope 2 emissions in Question 8.3 reflect the contractual arrangements you have with electricity suppliers? NA Yes NA NA
11.1a. You may report a total contractual Scope 2 figure in response to this question. Please provide your total global contractual Scope 2 GHG emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 0 NA 17902000 NA
11.2. Has your organization retired any certificates, e.g. Renewable Energy Certificates, associated with zero or low carbon electricity within the reporting year or has this been done on your behalf? NA No NA NA
3.1e. Please explain (i) why not; and (ii) forecast how your emissions will change over the next five years NA NA NA NA
3.2. Does the use of your goods and/or services directly enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party? No Yes Yes NA
3.2a. Please provide details (see guidance) NA 1) Infosys WalletEdge provides businesses and consumers with a whole new way of conducting financial transactions. Mobile Payments is one such new model which helps bridge the needs of telcos, banks and enterprises in touching the lives of millions by ena NA NA
3.3c Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities. 0 6 12 NA
3.3c. What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities? NA Dedicated budget for energy efficiency, Dedicated budget for low carbon product R&D, Employee engagement, Dedicated budget for other emission reduction activities, Compliance with regulatory requirements/standards, Dedicated budget for other emission redu NA NA
5. Attachments NA NA NA NA
5. Further Information NA NA NA NA
5.1. Have you identified any climate change risks (current or future) that have potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Risks driven by changes in regulation; Risks driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA NA
5.1a Identified risks driven by changes in regulation? NA Yes NA NA
5.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA The potential financial implications are inability to do business due to non-complains with any future regulations, increased operations cost affecting our annual revenues due to increased expenditure for compliance and mandatory disclosures. Further, the NA NA
14. Further Information NA We have taken a goal to become carbon neutral by 2017 by offsetting the combined Scope 1, 2 & 3 emissions from our India operations. We are aiming to meet all our electricity requirements from renewable sources and thereby 100% offset our scope 2 emission NA NA
1.1. Where is the highest level of direct responsibility for climate change within your company? No individual or committee with overall responsibility for climate change Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board NA
1.1a. Please identify the position of the individual or name of the committee with this responsibility NA Executive Co- Chairman & Member of the Board NA NA
1.2. Do you provide incentives for the management of climate change issues, including the attainment of targets? No Yes Yes NA
13. Further Information NA NA NA NA
13.1. How do your absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year compare to the previous year? Increased Decreased Decreased NA
13.1a (i) If absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) have increased, decreased or remained the same overall compared to the previous year, state direction of change NA General Decrease NA NA
13.1a (ii) If absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) have increased, decreased or remained the same overall compared to the previous year, state the reason for the direction of change NA Increase: Emissions reduction activities NA NA
13.1a (iii) If emissions have increased, decreased or remained the same overall, provide the emissions value (%) NA Decrease: , Increase: , Emission value for which direction is not stated: NA NA
2012 Score 0 72 100 NA
2012 Performance Band E C A NA
2.3a. Please explain (i) the engagement process and (ii) actions you are advocating NA Infosys is part of a coalition that is determined to take leadership in creating, sharing and adopting best practices that will enable the creation of a positive movement towards the achievement of thehuman goals of sustainability and wealth creation. NA NA
8.8. Are carbon dioxide emissions from the combustion of biologically sequestered carbon (i.e. carbon dioxide emissions from burning biomass/biofuels) relevant to your company? No No Yes NA
8.8a. Please provide the emissions in metric tonnes CO2e 0.01 NA 27263000 NA
Management 4. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/80/9080/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/4.Communication/Infosys Sustainability Report 2010-11.pdf NA NA
Management 4. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? NA 1 NA NA
5.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA Financial impacts are mainly from loss of revenue due to inability to conduct business due to climate change impacts on our operations and our clients; damage to our physical infrastructure due to extreme weather events and increased operational costs. T NA NA
2. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/80/9080/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/2.Strategy/Infosys Annual Report 2011-12.pdf NA NA
2. Further Information NA Infosys' carbon neutral commitment at UN Global compact forum - http://www.unglobalcompact.org/news/146-09-20-2011 Infosys among top 25 performers in caring for climate initiative - http://www.infosys.com/newsroom/features/Pages/caring-climate-initiativ NA NA
5.1c Identified climate change risks driven by change in physical climate parameters? NA Yes NA NA
2.1. Please select the option that best describes your risk management procedures with regard to climate change risks and opportunities NA Integrated into multi-disciplinary company wide risk management processes NA NA
2.1a. Please provide further details (see guidance) NA During last year, we have identified climate change as one of our key business risks and it has been integrated into our overall risk management framework under "operational risk" category. Further, we have integrated our sustainability goals in terms of NA NA
2.2. Is climate change integrated into your business strategy? No Yes Yes NA
2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes (see guidance) NA Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) at Infosys encompasses practices relating to identification, assessment, monitoring and mitigation of various risks to key business objectives. ERM at Infosys seeks to both minimize adverse impact of risks on our key busin NA NA
2.2b. Please explain why not NA NA NA NA
2.3. Do you engage with policy makers to encourage further action on mitigation and/or adaptation? No Yes Yes NA
3. Attachments NA NA NA NA
3. Further Information NA Only the major initiatives implemented and planned are mentioned in this section. There are numerous other operational and energy efficiency measures being implemented across our campuses. We have an internal goal of reducing our carbon intensity by 7% Yo NA NA
3.1. Did you have an emissions reduction target that was active (ongoing or reached completion) in the reporting year? No Intensity target Absolute and intensity targets NA
14.1. Do you participate in any emission trading schemes? No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next two years No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next two years Yes NA
14.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? No No Yes NA
6.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
6.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA We are an IT services and consulting firm and currently we do not see any opportunities due to changes in physical climate parameters to our operations or business revenues. We are working on developing solutions to our clients who might be exposed to cli NA NA
6.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA We are an IT services and consulting firm and currently we do not see any opportunities due to changes in physical climate parameters to our operations or business revenues. We are working on developing solutions to our clients who might be exposed to cli NA NA
7. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/80/9080/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/7.EmissionsMethodology/Stationary_combustion_tool_(Version4)-Infosys.xlsx NA NA
7. Further Information NA Emission from electricity consumption is calculated based on the emission factors defined by central electricity authority of India based on individual campus location in either north/southern grid. We have attached the CERC user guide for emission factor NA NA
7.1. Please provide your base year and base year emissions (Scopes 1 and 2) NA NA NA NA
0.4. Currency selection Please select the currency in which you would like to submit your response. All financial information contained in the response should be in this currency. NA INR(Rp) NA NA
1. Attachments NA NA NA NA
1. Further Information NA The year on year reduction of per capita electricity, water and carbon goals are part of the corporate score card of our Executive Co- Chairman & Member of the Board and members of the Green Initiatives and Facilities team. We have active eco-groups run b NA NA
8.7. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 2 emissions More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% NA
11.1b. Explain the basis of the alternative figure (see guidance) NA NA
14.1b. What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? NA NA
8.1. Please select the boundary you are using for your Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas inventory NA Operational control NA NA
8.2a. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 92 20294 231902967 NA
8.3a. Please provide your gross global Scope 2 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 293 158659 8071070 NA
8.4. Are there are any sources (e.g. facilities, specific GHGs, activities, geographies, etc.) of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions which are not included in your disclosure? NA Yes NA NA
8.6. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 1 emissions More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% NA More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
8.7. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 2 emissions Third party verification or assurance complete Proportion of Scope 2 emissions that are verified/assured for 2011-2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.7a. Please indicate the proportion of your Scope 2 emissions that are verified/assured More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% More than 90% but less than or equal to 100%
8.7b Reporting Period From/To/Please provide further details of the verification/assurance undertaken, and attach the relevant statements/Type of verification or assurance/Relevant standard/Attach the document No Response
8.8. Are carbon dioxide emissions from biologically sequestered carbon relevant to your organization? No
8.8a. Please provide the emissions in metric tonnes CO2 NA
8.8a. Please provide the emissions in metric tonnes CO2e 0.05 NA 13638000
9.1. Do you have Scope 1 emissions sources in more than one country? Yes
9.1a Reporting Period From/To/Please complete the table below: Country/Region/Scope 1 metric tonnes CO2e 1 Apr 2012/31 Mar 2013/India/28014.6
9.2. Please indicate which other Scope 1 emissions breakdowns you are able to provide (tick all that apply) NA By activity NA
9.2a Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by business division: Business division/Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) No Response
9.2b Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by facility: Facility/Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) No Response
9.2c Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by GHG type: GHG type/Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) No Response
9.2d Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by activity: Activity/Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) 1 Apr 2012/31 Mar 2013/Diesel usage for onsite generation of electricity/23207.01
9.2e Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by legal structure: Legal structure/Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) No Response
0.3. Country list configuration American Samoa
0.4. Currency selection Please select the currency in which you would like to submit your response. All financial information contained in the response should be in this currency. USD($)
0.4. Please select the currency in which you would like to submit your response. USD($)
0.5. Please select if you wish to complete a shorter information request. NA
0.6. Modules ICT As part of the Investor CDP information request, electric utilities, companies with electric utility activities or assets, companies in the automobile or auto component manufacture sectors and companies in the oil and gas industry should complete suppleme
1. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/sites/2013/80/9080/Investor CDP 2013/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2013/1.Governance/business-responsibility-report-2012-2013.pdf NA
1. Further Information NA The Infosys sustainability report 2011-12 is attached with this section which contains the corporate sustainability goals for the current reporting year, FY 2012-13 in page no 50 of the report. The business responsibility Report 2012-2013 is attached c NA
1.1. Where is the highest level of direct responsibility for climate change within your company? No individual or committee with overall responsibility for climate change Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board
1.1a. Please identify the position of the individual or name of the committee with this responsibility NA Name: Mr. S Gopalakrishnan Designation: Executive Co-Chairman Description: Mr. Gopalakrishnan is second in line after the Executive Chairman of the Board and was the immediate past CEO. The current CEO & MD, Mr.Shibulal reports into the Executive Co- NA
1.2. Do you provide incentives for the management of climate change issues, including the attainment of targets? No Yes Yes
1.2a. Who is entitled to benefit from these incentives? Director on board/Monetary reward/Mr. S Gopalakrishnan, Executive Co-Chairman of the company has the highest responsibility on climate change at Infosys. We recognize climate change as a very important global issue and have taken the voluntary commitment
10.1. Do you have Scope 2 emissions sources in more than one country? Yes
10.1a Reporting Period: From/To/Please complete the table below: Country/Region/Scope 2 metric tonnes CO2e/Purchased and consumed electricity, heat, steam or cooling (MWh)/Purchased and consumed low carbon electricity, heat, steam or cooling (MWh) 1 Apr 2012/31 Mar 2013/India/134229.78/174694.28/58127.52
10.2. Please indicate which other Scope 2 emissions breakdowns you are able to provide (tick all that apply) NA By facility NA
10.2a Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by business division: Business division/Scope 2 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) No Response
10.2b Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by facility: Facility/Scope 2 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) 1 Apr 2012/31 Mar 2013/Bangalore/13665.13
10.2c Reporting Period: From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by activity: Activity/Scope 2 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) No Response
10.2d Reporting Period: From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by legal structure: Legal structure/Scope 2 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) No Response
11. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/sites/2013/80/9080/Investor CDP 2013/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2013/11.Energy/Agreement with KERC.pdf NA
11. Further Information NA In FY 2012-13, we have procured about 58127 MWh of renewable power mainly from wind and mini-hydro plants. As per Indian government regulations, we are not eligible to acquire renewable energy certificates (RECs) as we directly procure from suppliers. (E NA
11.1. What percentage of your total operational spend in the reporting year was on energy? More than 0% but less than or equal to 5% More than 0% but less than or equal to 5% More than 95% but less than or equal to 100%
11.2. Please state how much fuel, electricity, heat, steam, and cooling in MWh your organization has purchased and consumed during the reporting year: Energy type/MWh Fuel/29273.03;Electricity/233248.2;Heat/0;Steam/0;Cooling/0
11.3. Please complete the table by breaking down the total "Fuel" figure entered above by fuel type: Fuels/MWh Diesel/Gas oil/29273.03
11.4. Please provide details of the electricity, heat, steam or cooling amounts that were accounted at a low carbon emission factor: Basis for applying a low carbon emission factor/MWh associated with low carbon electricity, heat, steam or cooling Power Purchase Agreements (PPA) not backed by instruments/58127.52
12. Attachments NA
12. Further Information NA
12.1. How do your absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year compare to the previous year? Decreased
12.1a Reason of change Emissions reduction activities, Divestment, Acquisitions, Mergers, Change in output, Change in methodology, Change in boundary, Change in physical operating conditions, Unidentified, Other
12.1a. Reason: Emissions value (percentage) Emissions reduction activities: 8.4/
12.2. Please describe your gross combined Scope 1 and 2 emissions for the reporting year in metric tonnes CO2e per revenue: Intensity figure/Metric numerator/% change from previous year/Direction of change from previous year/Reason for change 21.93/metric tonnes CO2e/13.4/Decrease/The total revenue unit is million USD. Our Revenue has increased by 5.78% and our Scope 1+2 emissions as decreased by 8.40% in FY 2013 compared to FY 2012.
12.3. Please describe your gross combined Scope 1 and 2 emissions for the reporting year in metric tonnes CO2e per FTE: Intensity figure/Metric numerator/% change from previous year/Direction of change from previous year/Reason for change 1.32
12.4. Please provide an additional intensity (normalized) metric that is appropriate to your business operations: Intensity figure/Metric numerator/% change from previous year/Direction of change from previous year/Reason for change 0.0053/metric tonnes CO2e/14.79/Decrease/We have added more that 2.1 million square foot area in the FY2013 compared to FY 2012 (increased by 7.50% YoY); but have reduced our Scope 1+2 emission due to investments in high energy efficient buildings and imp
13.1. Do you participate in any emissions trading schemes? No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next 2 years
13.1b. What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? NA
13.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? No
14. Attachments NA NA NA
14. Further Information NA NA NA
14.1. Do you participate in any emission trading schemes? No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next two years No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next 2 years Yes
14.1b. What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? NA
14.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? No No Yes
14.2. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 3 emissions Third party verification or assurance underway but not yet complete - last years statement available
14.2a. Please indicate the proportion of your Scope 3 emissions that are verified/assured More than 90% but less than or equal to 100%
14.3. Are you able to compare your Scope 3 emissions for the reporting year with those for the previous year for any sources? Yes
14.4. Do you engage with any of the elements of your value chain on GHG emissions and climate change strategies? (Tick all that apply) Yes, our suppliers; Yes, our customers
14.4a. Please give details of methods of engagement, your strategy for prioritizing engagements and measures of success Suppliers: During Fiscal 2013, the sustainable supply chain policy was rolled out which outlines our guidelines and vision to make our value chain more sustainable. We are now in the process of socializing the policy with our suppliers. In alignment with
14.4d. Please explain why not and any plans you have to develop an engagement strategy in the future NA
2. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/sites/2013/80/9080/Investor CDP 2013/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2013/2.Strategy/business-responsibility-report-2012-2013.pdf NA
2. Further Information NA 1) Infosys Sustainability Pollicy which is mentioned in section 2.2a is attached with this report for reference. 2) Information on CBERD mentioned in section 2.3f is available on this webpage: http://cberd.org/partners/industry-partners/ 3) Infosys bu NA
2.1. Please select the option that best describes your risk management procedures with regard to climate change risks and opportunities NA Integrated into multi-disciplinary company wide risk management processes NA
2.1a. Please provide further details In 2011, Infosys’ Co-founder and Executive Vice Chairman, Mr Kris Gopalakrishnan who also leads BASD and is a member of the UNGC, publicly articulated Infosys’ commitment to become carbon neutral by end of 2017. This is our recognition of risks and speci
2.1a. Please provide further details (see guidance) NA In 2011, Infosys’ Co-founder and Executive Vice Chairman, Mr Kris Gopalakrishnan who also leads BASD and is a member of the UNGC, publicly articulated Infosys’ commitment to become carbon neutral by end of 2017. This is our recognition of risks and speci NA
2.2. Is climate change integrated into your business strategy? No Yes Yes
2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes How Climate Change has influenced our Business Strategy: Sustainability and climate change have influence us to create our sustainability policy, which focusses on four tracks 1) making our business sustainable, 2) making our clients’ business sustainable
2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes (see guidance) NA How Climate Change has influenced our Business Strategy: Sustainability and climate change have influence us to create our sustainability policy, which focusses on four tracks 1) making our business sustainable, 2) making our clients’ business sustainable NA
2.2b. Please explain why not NA NA NA
2.3. Do you engage in activities that could either directly or indirectly influence policy on climate change through any of the following? (tick all that apply) Yes
2.3. Do you engage with policy makers to encourage further action on mitigation and/or adaptation? No Yes Yes
2.3a. On what issues have you been engaging directly?: Focus of legislation/Corporate Position/Details of engagement/Proposed solution Energy efficiency/Support/We directly engage with the Bureau of Energy Efficiency (a statutory body under the Ministry of Power, Government of India) in order to influence energy efficiency policy. We have supported BEE in their workshops on Energy Conser
2.3a. Please explain (i) the engagement process and (ii) actions you are advocating NA We directly engage with the Bureau of Energy Efficiency (a statutory body under the Ministry of Power, Government of India) in order to influence energy efficiency policy. We have supported BEE in their workshops on Energy Conservation Building Code (ECBC NA
2.3b. Are you on the Board of any trade associations or provide funding beyond membership? Yes
2.3c. Please enter the details of those trade associations that are likely to take a position on climate change legislation/Trade association United Nations Global Compact/Consistent/To promote sustainability through ten key principles covering Human Rights, Labour, Environment and Anti-Corruption./We are aligned with their vision and are working to implement their vision. We have made a volunt
2.3d. Do you publically disclose a list of all the research organizations that you fund? Yes
2.3e. Do you fund any research organizations to produce public work on climate change? Yes
2.3f. Please describe the work and how it aligns with your own strategy on climate change Joint Clean Energy Research and Development Centre (JCERDC): Indian and the US governments launched the U.S.-India Partnership to Advance Clean Energy (PACE) under the U.S.-India Memorandum of Understanding to enhance cooperation on Energy Security, Energ
2.3g. Please provide details of the other engagement activities that you undertake NA
2.3h. What processes do you have in place to ensure that all of your direct and indirect activities that influence policy are consistent with your overall climate change strategy? We have the following processes in place to ensure that our activities that influence policy are consistent with our overall climate change strategy. Performance Goals: The teams that are engaged with external organizations have clearly defined goals wi
2.3i. Please explain why you do not engage with policy makers NA
3. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/sites/2013/80/9080/Investor CDP 2013/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2013/3.TargetsandInitiatives/infosys-sustainability-report-2011-12.pdf NA
3. Further Information NA Infosys' Sustainability Report for FY 2011-12 is attached with this section which contains the sustainability goals including carbon reduction target for FY 2012-13 in page no 50 of the report. The year on year 7% carbon intensity reduction goal is a cons NA
3.1. Did you have an emissions reduction target that was active (ongoing or reached completion) in the reporting year? No Intensity target Absolute and intensity targets
3.1a. Absolute target/ID/Scope/% of emissions in scope/% reduction from base year/Base year/Base year emissions (metric tonnes CO2e)/Target year/Comment No Response
3.1b. Intensity target/ID/Scope/% of emissions in scope/% reduction from base year/Metric/Base year/Normalized base year emissions/Target year/Comment 3.1.1/Scope 1+2/100/100/metric tonnes CO2e per FTE employee/2008/2.84/2018/Infosys has a public commitment to become carbon neutral by December 2017. The target year is mentioned as 2018 as follow the April to March cycle for our financial year.
3.1c. What change in absolute emissions this intensity target reflects/ID/Direction of change anticipated in absolute Scope 1+2 emissions at target completion?/% change anticipated in absolute Scope 1+2 emissions 3.1.1/Decrease/100///Infosys has a two pronged strategy to reduce our scope 1 and 2 emissions by FY 2018, 1) Reduce the electricity consumption per FTE of Infosys by 50% and 2) Source 100% of renewable energy to meet our electricity requirement.
3.1d. Please provide details on your progress against this target made in the reporting year/ID/% complete (time)/% complete (emissions)/Comment 3.1.1/50/53.5/As of FY 2013 (5th year into our carbon neutral goal), we have reduced our per capita scope 1 and 2 emissions by 53.5% compared to FY 2008.
3.1e. Please explain (i) why not; and (ii) forecast how your emissions will change over the next five years NA NA NA
3.2. Does the use of your goods and/or services directly enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party? No Yes Yes
3.2a. Please provide details (see guidance) NA How the emissions are/were avoided: Working with Infosys, one of our clients developed a private cloud with two T3 super hubs to provision both software- and Infrastructure-as-a-Service. The project delivered a scalable, flexible and agile IT platform for NA
3.3. Did you have emissions reduction initiatives that were active within the reporting year (this can include those in the planning and/or implementation phases) No Yes Yes
3.3a. Please identify the total number of projects at each stage of development, and for those in theimplementation stages, the estimated CO2e savings/Stage of development/3.3a. Number of projects/Total estimated annual CO2e savings in metric tonnes CO2e Under investigation/0/0
3.3c Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities. 0 6 13 Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities.
3.3c. What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities? NA Dedicated budget for energy efficiency, Dedicated budget for low carbon product R&D, Dedicated budget for other emissions reduction activities, Employee engagement, Compliance with regulatory requirements/standards, Dedicated budget for other emissions re NA
3.3c. What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities?/Comment Dedicated budget for energy efficiency/Infosys has a dedicated team under Green initiatives group to implement projects in energy efficiency projects in our buildings with their dedicated budget.
4. Attachments NA
4. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? - Further Information We have attached three reports with this section, 1) business-responsibility-report-2012-2013.pdf, 2) infosys-sustainability-report-2011-12.pdf and 3) Infosys-Annual Report - 2012-2013.pdf. The Infosys Sustainability reports from FY 2008 onwards are ava
4.1. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? 2 The number of corporate annual reports and voluntary publications (complete and/or underway) made about the company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance
5. Attachments NA NA NA
5. Further Information NA To address these potential risks, we have identified climate change as one of the key operational risks with in our risk framework. Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) at Infosys seeks to minimize adverse impact of risks on our business objectives and enable NA
5.1. Have you identified any climate change risks (current or future) that have potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Risks driven by changes in regulation; Risks driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA
5.1a. Climate change risks driven by changes in regulation Yes
5.1a. Please describe your risks driven by changes in regulation /ID/Risk driver/ Description/Potential impact/Timeframe/Direct/Indirect/Likelihood/Magnitude of impact 1a.1/Emission reporting obligations/The Securities Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has mandated the top 100 Indian listed companies (by Market Capitalization) to report on Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) parameters as part of their Annual Financ
5.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk and (iii) the costs associated with these actions The potential financial implications due to regulatory risks are inability to do business due to non-compliance with any future regulations, increased operations cost affecting our annual revenues due to increased expenditure for compliance and mandatory
5.1c. Climate change risks driven by change in physical climate parameters Yes
5.1c. Please describe your risks that are driven by change in physical climate parameters/ID/Risk driver/Description/Potential impact/Timeframe/Direct/Indirect/Likelihood/Magnitude of impact 1c.1/Sea level rise/Rise in sea levels has more indirect impacts arising from disruptions of the city's functional continuity such as transport network and utility which may disrupt our operations due to office closures. However, for our building infrast
5.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA The potential financial impacts due to physical risks are mainly from loss of revenue due to inability to conduct business due to climate change impacts on our operations and our clients; damage to our physical infrastructure due to extreme weather events NA
5.1e. Please describe your risks that are driven by changes in other climate-related developments/ID/Risk driver/Description/Potential impact/Timeframe/Direct/Indirect/Likelihood/Magnitude of impact 1/Uncertainty of physical risks/Potential risks include weather related impacts (i.g. increases in storms, flooding, natural disasters) which could impact our manufacturing facilities, suppliers and customers. At this point, we are unable to pinpoint spe
5.1e.Climate change risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments Yes
5.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA The potential financial impact due to other climate related development pertain to loss of revenue due to changing client needs for working with more sustainability orientated companies, reputation risks associated with Infosys Carbon Neutrality goal and NA
5.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
5.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
5.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
6. Attachments NA NA NA
6. Further Information NA NA NA
6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Opportunities driven by changes in regulation; Opportunities driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA
6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? -Transparency Yes
6.1a Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in regulation? NA Yes NA
6.1a. Please describe your opportunities that are driven by changes in regulation/ID/Opportunity driver/Description/Potential impact/Timeframe/Direct/Indirect/Likelihood/Magnitude of impact 1a.1/International agreements/Multilateral environmental and climate change-related agreements elicit commitment to sustainable goals through national-level regulations and reporting requirements. Organisations operating across regions, as signatories to
6.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity and (iii) the costs associated with these actions ID 1a.1 & 1a.2: (i) ~USD 11 million global market for our Sustainability Reporting and Compliance offerings such as consulting services and solutions by 2015. (ii) Infosys is well-placed to assist clients in responding to their obligations through its
6.1c. Please describe the opportunities that are driven by changes in physical climate parameters Yes
6.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity and (iii) the costs associated with these actions ID 1c.1: (i) Annual cost savings accrued from energy efficient projects implemented across Infosys Development Centres amounts to ~USD 1 million. (ii) Infosys embeds sustainability aspects in its own operations at its offshore and onsite locations by way
6.1e. Please describe the opportunities that are driven by changes in other climate-related developments Yes
6.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA ID 1e.1: (i) Positive branding and improved reputation from Infosys' internal commitments towards sustainability and its business offerings to clients could potentially lead to ~5% increased revenue over a 3-5 year period. (ii) Infosys is constantly striv NA
6.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
6.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
6.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
7. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/sites/2013/80/9080/Investor CDP 2013/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2013/7.EmissionsMethodology/EF's.xlsx NA
7. Further Information NA CO2 Emission Factor (kg CO2/GJ) = (Carbon Content * Carbon Oxidation factor *44/12)] Base Year GHG Emissions have been recalculated due to changes in calculation methodology and GWP values. NA
7.1. Please provide your base year and base year emissions (Scopes 1 and 2)/7.1. Base year From Date:/To Date:/ Scope 1 Base year emissions (metric tonnes CO2e)/N39Scope 2 Base year emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) 2007-04-01/2008-03-31/12453.66/167267.71
7.2. Please give the name of the standard, protocol or methodology you have used to collect activity data and calculate Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions NA IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, 2006/The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (Revised Edition)/ISO 14064-1/India GHG Inventory Programme NA
7.3. Please give the source for the global warming potentials you have used Gas/Reference CO2/IPCC Second Assessment Report (SAR - 100 year)
7.4. Please give the emissions factors you have applied and their origin; alternatively, please attach an Excel spreadsheet with this data Fuel/Material/Energy/Emission Factor/Unit/Reference Electricity/0.78/Other: KG CO2 per KWH/For NEWNE Grid - Central Electricity Authority, Ministry of Power, Government of India. (www.cea.nic.
8.1. Please select the boundary you are using for your Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas inventory NA Operational control NA Boundary used for Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas inventory during 2011-2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.2. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 28014.6 Gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e for 2011 - 2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.2. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figures in metric tonnes CO2e 28014.6
8.3. Please provide your gross global Scope 2 emissions figures in metric tonnes CO2e 134229.78
8.4. Are there are any sources (e.g. facilities, specific GHGs, activities, geographies, etc.) of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions which are not included in your disclosure? NA Yes NA Proportion of Scope 1 emissions that are verified/assured for 2011 - 2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.4a Reporting Period From/To/Source/Scope/Explain why the source is excluded 1 Apr 2012/31 Mar 2013/Global emission outside India Operations/Scope 1 and 2/Infosys has a global footprint and operates from 87 Development Centre’s in 35 countries. The geographical boundary of GHG Emission Inventory is limited to operations within In
8.5 Reporting Period From/To/Please estimate the uncertainty of the total gross global Scope 1 and 2 emissions figures that you have supplied and specify the sources of uncertainty in your data gathering, handling and calculations/Scope 1 emissions No Response
8.6. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 1 emissions Third party verification or assurance complete Proportion of Scope 1 emissions that are verified/assured for 2011 - 2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.6a. Please indicate the proportion of your Scope 1 emissions that are verified/assured More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% More than 90% but less than or equal to 100%
8.6b Reporting Period From/To/Please provide further details of the verification/assurance undertaken, and attach the relevant statements: Type of verification or assurance/Attach the document No Response
2013 Performance Band E A A NA
2013 Score 0 92 100 NA
0. Attachments NA NA NA If you have not been presented with a sector module that you consider would be appropriate for your company to answer, please select the module below. If you wish to view the questions first, please see https://www.cdproject.net/en-US/Programmes/Pages/Mor
0. Further Information NA NA NA If you are in these sectors (according to the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS)), the corresponding sector modules will be marked as default options to your information request. If you want to query your classification, please email respond@c
0.1. Introduction - Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. NA Infosys is a global leader in consulting, technology and outsourcing with revenues of US$ 7.398 billion (FY13). Many of the world’s most successful organizations rely on Infosys to deliver measurable business value. Infosys provides business consulting, t NA
0.1. Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. Infosys is a global leader in consulting, technology and outsourcing with revenues of US$ 7.398 billion (FY13). Many of the world’s most successful organizations rely on Infosys to deliver measurable business value. Infosys provides business consulting, t
0.2. Please state the start and end date of the year for which you are reporting data. 2011-01-01
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
2011 Electricity Usage /MWh 35 273149 272242310 Annual electricity consumption resulting from all operations within the defined boundaries of a given organisation.
2011 Renewables Usage /MWh 5 48121 20498400 Total number of MWh of electricity or proxy purchased globally from renewable energy power-generating projects directly or indirectly.
Biomass/Biofuel (%) 0 0 100 Biomass = woody waste; agricultural crops or waste; animal and other organic waste; energy crops; co-firing of biomass in fossil fuel generation plants. Biofuel = biofuels such as bioethanol and biodiesel.
Blend (%) 0 0 100 Blend = renewable electricity consisting of a mix of renewables as provided by for example third-party marketers.
Country India NA
Geothermal (%) 0 0 79 Geothermal = all electricity from geothermal facilities.
Global CREX rank 1 146 280 The CREX participants are ranked based on the percentage of renewable electricity procured for their own use in 2011, calculated by dividing renewable electricity consumption by total electricity consumption for the period.
Hydro (%) 0 31 100 Hydro = hydro projects from new generation capacity.
Sector Technology NA ICB system top-level industry designation (via the Bloomberg Terminal).
Solar (%) 0 1 100 Solar = all electricity produced solar photovoltaics (PV) and solar thermal facilities.
Unknown (%) 0 0 100
Waste to energy (%) 0 0 100 Waste-to-energy = electricity using landfill gas or waste from other facilities such as wastewater treatment stations.
Wind (%) 0 68 100 Wind = all electricity from wind turbines.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Reported Scope 3 Total (tCO2e) 670000000 146003 0 Indicated the total reported Scope 3 (all other indirect emissions) of the company in metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent (tCO2e) as defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol. Where no Scope 3 emissions are reported, this is recorded as "No Data"
Scope 1+2 Intensity 11162.43 35.65 0.3 Intensity is calculated by adding together a company's Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions and dividing by its turnover.
Global 800 Carbon Rank 800 33 1 Carbon Ranking of 800 international companies. Ranking is determined by EIO Methodology. See Source Info sheet for comments on it
No. of Scope 3 Categories Reported 1 2 15 This column indicates the number of Scope 3 Categories reported. Once placed into one of the four Disclosure Categories, companies are ranked by the number of Scope 3 categories disclosed.
Reported Scope 1+2 Total (tCO2e) 282000000 178952 843 The total reported Scope 1 (all direct emissions) and Scope 2 (indirect electricity emissions) of the company in metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent (tCO2e) as defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol
Accepted or Inferred Scope 3 Intensity 8547.13 314.82 64.51 Unless the company reports all 15 Scope 3 categories as defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Standard, an inferred figure based on the highest reported intensity for that sector, across the Global ET Universe, is shown
Category No Public Data Green Public, Complete, and Verified data Companies are placed into one of four data or 'disclosure' categories: 1) Public, Complete, and Verified data; 2) Public, Complete, and Unverified data; 3) Public, Incomplete, Verified or Unverified data; 4) No Public Data
Combined Scope 1+2+3 Intensity 12161.68 193.06 34.24 Combined Scope 1+2_3 Intensity is calculated by adding together a company's Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions at 100% (disclosed or inferred) + 50% of Scope 3 emissions (disclosed or inferred).
Market Value ($Million) 1667.87 24182 358143.1 A company's market value, or market capitalism (number of shares times x share price). This value was taken on 23.08.2011
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Description NA Description of the company's product.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
ceo:numberOfRatings 1 2584 4026 The number of ratings of the CEO
ceo:pctApprove 0 47 100 Percent of ratings of the CEO that were approving
ceo:title NA The title of the company's CEO
employer:numberOfRatings 1 6099 6549 The number of Glassdoor users who have rated this company as a place to work.
Glassdoor Employer Ratings 1 3.2 5 The Top Companies for Work-Life Balance list is based on employee feedback shared in company reviews on Glassdoor.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Size NA MNE NA NA
Region NA Asia NA NA
Report Html Address NA http://www.infosys.com/sustainability/Pages/sustainability-report.aspx NA NA
Report Pdf Address NA http://www.infosys.com/sustainability/Documents/infosys-sustainability-report-2011-12.pdf NA NA
Report reference IFC Performance Standards? NA No NA NA
Report reference ISO Standards? NA No NA NA
Report Title NA Growing responsibly -Infosys Sustainability Report 2011-12 NA NA
Sector NA Commercial Services NA NA
Sector Supplements (Final) NA Not Applicable NA NA
Application Level Undeclared A+ A+ G3 Application Levels indicate to which extent the GRI Guidelines have been utilized in the reporting and which set and number of disclosures have been addressed in the reporting. There are three Application Levels A, B and C.
Country (HQ) NA India NA NA
Date Added To Sr List NA April 3, 2013 NA NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Date Added To Sr List NA 41521.5833 NA Date added to the GRI list.
Guidelines NA GRI - G3.1 NA This field indicates which version of the GRI Guidelines is used for the reporting. As of publication year 2009, GRI only includes reporting that makes use of the G3 Guidelines, which were released in October 2006.
Integrated No No Yes GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
Publication Year 2013 GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
Region NA Asia NA Region the organization operates in.
Report Html Address NA NA NA URL of the report location.
Report Pdf Address NA http://www.infosys.com/sustainability/Documents/infosys-sustainability-report-2012-13.pdf NA Location of a PDF version of the report.
Report Title NA Relevance through Innovation NA Title of the report.
Sector NA Commercial Services NA Industry sector.
Sector Supplements (Final) NA Not Applicable NA This field indicates if the reporting organization has made use of one of the final Sector Supplements and which one. If ‘not used’ is indicated, it means that one of the final Sector Supplements is applicable, but has not been used. If ‘not applicable’ i
Size NA MNE NA GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Envtl. Mgmt. 28.6 88.5 91.9 Based on an analysis of companies tracked in Sustainalytics’ Global Platform, the Environmental Management Score is an assessment of how a company manages its environmental performance through policies, programs, targets, certifications, and the like. To
Green Score 0 78.9 100 NA
Rank 500 19 1 NA
Disclosure 0 99.9 100 Environmental disclosure was included as a stand-alone score to assess each company’s transparency with regard to its environmental performance. Specifically, this score evaluates the breadth and quality of company environmen
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Carbon Productivity 0.015 0.395 0.963 GHG Productivity defined as Revenue ($US) / Total Greenhouse gas (GHG) Emissions (CO2e).
Energy Productivity 0.007 0.333 0.957 Energy Productivity defined as Revenue ($US) / Total Energy Consumption (GJ).
Newsweek Green Score 0.0 0.333 0.843 This score is derived from the following component scores: an Energy Productivity,Carbon Productivity, Water Productivity, Waste Productivity, Reputation, Pay Link, Sustainability Themed Committee, Audit ; weighted at 45 percent, 45 percent, and 10 percen
Pay Link No No Yes A mechanism to link the remuneration of any member of a company's senior executive team with the achievement of environmental performance targets.
Rank 500 299 1
Reputation 0.005 0.762 1 The Reputation score is made up of two components: (1) The RepRisk Index, which is a quantitative measure that captures criticism and quantifies a company exposure to ESG risks. (2) The second component is based on the number of environmental issues that
Sustainability Themed Committee No No Yes The existence of a committee at the Board of Directors level whose mandate is related to the sustainability of the company, including but not limited to environmental matters.
Waste Productivity 0.014 0.091 0.97 Waste Productivity is defined as Revenue ($US) / [Total waste generated (metric tonnes) – waste recycled/reused (metric tonnes)].
Water Productivity 0.012 0.054 0.992 Water Productivity is defined as Revenue ($US) / Total water use (m3).
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Corporate Governance 3 0.2 0 The scores for each ESG scope issue ranges from 0-3. The scoring refers to the number of times the company was criticized in relation to that scope issue: 0 = little or no exposure in the past 4 years; 1 = 5 direct relations in the past 4 years; 2 = 10 direct relations in the past 4 years; 3 = 20 direct relations in the past 4 years.
Current RRI 86 24 0 The RepRisk Index (RRI) is a quantitative risk measure that captures criticism and quantifies a company's exposure to controversial environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues. It does not measure a company's overall reputation, but rather is an indicator of their reputational risk.The Current RRI value indicates the current level of criticism about a company.
Employee Relations 3 1.6 0 The scores for each ESG scope issue ranges from 0-3. The scoring refers to the number of times the company was criticized in relation to that scope issue: 0 = little or no exposure in the past 4 years; 1 = 5 direct relations in the past 4 years; 2 = 10 direct relations in the past 4 years; 3 = 20 direct relations in the past 4 years.
Environmental FootPrint 3 0 0 The scores for each ESG scope issue ranges from 0-3. The scoring refers to the number of times the company was criticized in relation to that scope issue: 0 = little or no exposure in the past 4 years; 1 = 5 direct relations in the past 4 years; 2 = 10 direct relations in the past 4 years; 3 = 20 direct relations in the past 4 years.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Rank 400 388 1 REPORTWATCH RATING
Report Rating D B- A REPORTWATCH RATING
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
include_measurement 0 1 1 Does your COP identify targets, define performance indicators and measure outcomes?
references_anti_corruption 0 1 1 Does your COP contain description of actions, and when relevant policies, related to anti-corruption?
references_environment 0 1 1 Does your COP contain description of actions, and when relevant policies, related to the environment?
references_human_rights 0 1 1 Does your COP contain description of actions, and when relevant policies, related to human rights?
references_labour 0 1 1 Does your COP contain description of actions, and when relevant policies, related to labour rights?
starts_on NA 04/01/2012 NA Start Date
differentiation NA advanced NA At what level is the declarer?
ends_on NA 03/01/2013 NA End Date
format NA sustainability_report NA How is your COP shared with stakeholders?
World Business Council for Sustainable Development
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Strategic Partners Yes Yes Strategic Partners comprise some of the world’s leading corporate citizens and provide essential leadership in support of the Forum’s mission. Strategic Partners are a key force in our activities and communities at the global, regional and industry levels. They help shape our initiatives, projects and task forces and give intellectual guidance through the participation of their most senior executives on steering boards and in advisory groups. Their considerable financial support and in-kind services – including the provision of dedicated staff to assist with our operations – allow the Forum to deliver its programmes and advance worldwide economic and social progress.

Flags

(Other Indicators - things that don’t affect ratings but that help identify or classify companies)

SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
You have put report(s) in your cart
Go to my cart
Ok