CSRHub is the world’s largest CSR (corporate social responsibility) and sustainability ratings and information database.

Estee Lauder Inc. is a global cosmetics company specializing in skincare, makeup, and fragrance products. Headquartered in New York, the Company retails products in more than 135 countries worldwide. In the United States, Estee Lauder products are available in department stores, specialty stores and online at esteelauder.com.

Ticker: EL ISIN: US5184391044
Address: 767 Fifth Avenue, USA, New York, NY, 10153 Website: Estee Lauder Inc.
Phone #: 1-212-5724200 CSR Web Area: SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Basic Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Ratings

  Overall Community Employees Environment Governance
Estee Lauder Inc. 61 58 66 65 52
Luxury Goods & Cosmetics Manufacturing
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
All company average 55 56 57 58 52
USA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Percentile Rankings

Rankings are in percentile terms, compared to other companies in the same industry and country Overall Community Employees Environment Governance
Estee Lauder Inc. 78% 58% 81% 73% 45%
Luxury Goods & Cosmetics Manufacturing
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
USA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Ratings History

Only subscribers can interact with the graph.

More CSR Rating Details

  Community Employees
Community Dev & Philanthropy Product Human Rights & Supply Chain Compensation & Benefits Diversity & Labor Rights Training, Health & Safety
Estee Lauder Inc.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Luxury Goods & Cosmetics Manufacturing
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
All company average 54 56 56 58 55 56
USA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Environment Governance
Energy & Climate Change Environmant Policy & Reporting Resource Management Board Leadership Ethics Transparency & Reporting
Estee Lauder Inc.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Luxury Goods & Cosmetics Manufacturing
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
All company average 57 60 57 49 55 52
USA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Percentile rankings

Rankings are in percentile terms, compared to other companies in the same industry and country Community Employees
Community Dev & Philantrophy Product Human Rights & Supply Chain Compensation & Benefits Diversity & Labor Rights Training, Health & Safety
Estee Lauder Inc.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Luxury Goods & Cosmetics Manufacturing
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
USA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Environment Governance
Energy & Climate Change Environment Policy & Reporting Resource Management Board Leadership Ethics Transparency & Reporting
Estee Lauder Inc.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Luxury Goods & Cosmetics Manufacturing
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
USA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

3 Special Issues Affect This Company (see a list of issues here)

Gay & Lesbian Sensitive Diverse Board Animal Test User
# of Sources 1 4 5
# of co. % of co. # of co. % of co. # of co. % of co.
Luxury Goods & Cosmetics Manufacturing
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Overall database 271 2.9 111 1.2 96 1.0
USA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

CSRHub Has 55 Data Sources (31 Are Currently Active) for This Company

= sources impacting the current ratings
= sources not impacting the current ratings, but included in earlier ratings for this company
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Original Data Values

(unsubscribed users can see the list, subscribers can see the data details for most sources)

Data source name

Data source element name Minimum value Value provided by datasource Maximum value Data description
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Brand Finance 2012-13
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Brand Value 2013 11.095 3869.594 67875.2014 NA
BSI 50 72.6067 89.6275 NA
Domicile UNITED STATES NA
Sector Consumer, Non-cyclical NA
Reviewed SJD NA
Brand Rating 2013 BBB AA+ AAA+ NA
Enterprise Value 2013 0 8711.3778 435750.9811
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Brand Value / Enterprise Value (%) 0.009 0.4644 1.07 NA
Brand Value 2014 10 1755.1677 87304 A brand strength is assessed by using our Brand Strength Index framework. This benchmarks the strength, risk and future potential of a brand relative to its competitors by assessing input measures, brand equity measures, and output performance across four
BSI 51.3 80.497 94.2 NA
Domicile UNITED STATES NA
Enterprise Value 2014 66 10814.6492 526619 NA
Sector Consumer, Non-cyclical NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
CalPERS Proxy Voting 2012
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Proxy filed No NA
Proxy voting decisions for the company NA NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Proxy voting decisions for the company NA NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Percent of brands that use animal testing 100 0.88 0 NA
Number of brands that don't use animal testing 0 3 11 NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
0. Further Information NA NA NA NA
0.1. Introduction - Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. NA The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. is one of the world's leading manufacturers and marketers of quality skin care, makeup, fragrance and hair care products. The Company's products are sold in over 150 countries and territories under brand names including: Es NA NA
5.1e Identified climate change risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments? NA No NA NA
5.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA NA NA NA
5.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA We understand that regulations effecting carbon and climate change have both direct and indirect impacts on our business. As our business is not energy intensive and our industry operates in similar fashions, we do not find these regulatory risks to be ma NA NA
5.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA We continue to assess the physical risks of climate change, but do not consider these effects to have the potential to substantively change our business. We realize that physical changes have the ability to affect the full lifecycle of our business, but c NA NA
5.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA We realize that risks driven by other climate-related developments may have the potential to affect our business, but in our current view, we do not feel that they have the potential to substantively change our business. As a prestige beauty company, ou NA NA
6. Attachments NA NA NA NA
6. Further Information NA NA NA NA
6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA NA NA NA
6.1a Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in regulation? NA No NA NA
6.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA NA NA NA
6.1c Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in physical climate parameters? NA No NA NA
14. Attachments NA NA NA NA
6.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA NA NA NA
6.1e Identified opportunities that are driven by changes in other climate-related developments? NA No NA NA
6.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA NA NA NA
13. Attachments NA NA NA NA
11. Attachments NA NA NA NA
11. Further Information NA NA NA NA
11.1. Do you consider that the grid average factors used to report Scope 2 emissions in Question 8.3 reflect the contractual arrangements you have with electricity suppliers? NA No NA NA
11.1a. You may report a total contractual Scope 2 figure in response to this question. Please provide your total global contractual Scope 2 GHG emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 0 27380 17902000 NA
11.2. Has your organization retired any certificates, e.g. Renewable Energy Certificates, associated with zero or low carbon electricity within the reporting year or has this been done on your behalf? NA Yes NA NA
3.1e. Please explain (i) why not; and (ii) forecast how your emissions will change over the next five years NA NA NA NA
3.2. Does the use of your goods and/or services directly enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party? No No Yes NA
3.2a. Please provide details (see guidance) NA NA NA NA
3.3c Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities. 0 2 12 NA
3.3c. What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities? NA Dedicated budget for energy efficiency, Lower return on investment (ROI) specification NA NA
5. Attachments NA NA NA NA
5. Further Information NA NA NA NA
5.1. Have you identified any climate change risks (current or future) that have potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA NA NA NA
5.1a Identified risks driven by changes in regulation? NA No NA NA
5.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA NA NA NA
14. Further Information NA NA NA NA
1.1. Where is the highest level of direct responsibility for climate change within your company? No individual or committee with overall responsibility for climate change Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board NA
1.1a. Please identify the position of the individual or name of the committee with this responsibility NA The Corporate Environmental Affairs and Safety Committee (EAS Committee) is responsible for setting the environmental and safety policies of the Company, including those pertaining to climate change and greenhouse gas emissions. The EAS Committee encompas NA NA
1.2. Do you provide incentives for the management of climate change issues, including the attainment of targets? No Yes Yes NA
13. Further Information NA NA NA NA
13.1. How do your absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year compare to the previous year? Increased Increased Decreased NA
13.1a (i) If absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) have increased, decreased or remained the same overall compared to the previous year, state direction of change NA Slightly Increased NA NA
13.1a (ii) If absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) have increased, decreased or remained the same overall compared to the previous year, state the reason for the direction of change NA Decrease: Change in output, Decrease: Emissions reduction activities NA NA
13.1a (iii) If emissions have increased, decreased or remained the same overall, provide the emissions value (%) NA Decrease: , Increase: 16 , Emission value for which direction is not stated: NA NA
2012 Score 0 85 100 NA
2012 Performance Band E C A NA
2.3a. Please explain (i) the engagement process and (ii) actions you are advocating NA NA NA NA
8.8. Are carbon dioxide emissions from the combustion of biologically sequestered carbon (i.e. carbon dioxide emissions from burning biomass/biofuels) relevant to your company? No No Yes NA
8.8a. Please provide the emissions in metric tonnes CO2e 0.01 NA 27263000 NA
Management 4. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/85/5885/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/4.Communication/EsteeLauder2011AR.lr150dpi.pdf NA NA
Management 4. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? NA 2 NA NA
5.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA NA NA NA
2. Attachments NA NA NA NA
2. Further Information NA NA NA NA
5.1c Identified climate change risks driven by change in physical climate parameters? NA No NA NA
2.1. Please select the option that best describes your risk management procedures with regard to climate change risks and opportunities NA Integrated into multi-disciplinary company wide risk management processes NA NA
2.1a. Please provide further details (see guidance) NA We have enacted a comprehensive cross functional program to address Corporate Risks including Climate Change risks in two distinct manners. We have included Climate Change risks within our annual Enterprise Risk Management process. The Enterprise Risk A NA NA
2.2. Is climate change integrated into your business strategy? No Yes Yes NA
2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes (see guidance) NA The risks and opportunities associated with Climate Change are integrated into the overall business strategy with oversight from the Environmental Affairs and Safety (EAS) Committee. The EAS Committee encompasses seven subcommittees that set Corporate Res NA NA
2.2b. Please explain why not NA NA NA NA
2.3. Do you engage with policy makers to encourage further action on mitigation and/or adaptation? No No Yes NA
3. Attachments NA NA NA NA
3. Further Information NA NA NA NA
3.1. Did you have an emissions reduction target that was active (ongoing or reached completion) in the reporting year? No Intensity target Absolute and intensity targets NA
14.1. Do you participate in any emission trading schemes? No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next two years No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next two years Yes NA
14.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? No Yes Yes NA
6.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA We do not expect that we would be materially affected by carbon and climate change regulations and we do not view these as presenting opportunities that would have the potential to substantively change our business. Regulations that increase energy costs NA NA
6.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA Changes in physical climate parameters present limited opportunities to substantively change our business operations, revenue or expenditure. Growing seasons for natural ingredients may expand and the climates where we manufacture may become more tempera NA NA
6.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA We do not anticipate that other climate-related developments have the potential to substantively change our business operations, revenue or expenditure. We understand that climate change has the potential to affect consumer behavior and that our reputati NA NA
7. Attachments NA NA NA NA
7. Further Information NA NA NA NA
7.1. Please provide your base year and base year emissions (Scopes 1 and 2) NA NA NA NA
0.4. Currency selection Please select the currency in which you would like to submit your response. All financial information contained in the response should be in this currency. NA USD($) NA NA
1. Attachments NA NA NA NA
1. Further Information NA NA NA NA
8.7. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 2 emissions More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% NA More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% NA
11.1b. Explain the basis of the alternative figure (see guidance) We directly purchased Green-E certified (or international equivalent) renewable electricity from utilities in Minnesota, Canada, the United Kingdom, Switzerland and Belgium to provide green electricity (wind - United States, hydro - Canada and Europe) to NA
14.1b. What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? NA NA
8.1. Please select the boundary you are using for your Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas inventory NA NA NA NA
8.2a. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 92 NA 231902967 NA
8.3a. Please provide your gross global Scope 2 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 293 NA 8071070 NA
8.4. Are there are any sources (e.g. facilities, specific GHGs, activities, geographies, etc.) of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions which are not included in your disclosure? NA Yes NA NA
8.6. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 1 emissions More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% NA More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
8.8a. Please provide the emissions in metric tonnes CO2e 0.05 NA 13638000
0.4. Currency selection Please select the currency in which you would like to submit your response. All financial information contained in the response should be in this currency. USD($)
0.6. Modules NA As part of the Investor CDP information request, electric utilities, companies with electric utility activities or assets, companies in the automobile or auto component manufacture sectors and companies in the oil and gas industry should complete suppleme
1. Attachments NA NA NA
1. Further Information NA NA NA
1.1. Where is the highest level of direct responsibility for climate change within your company? No individual or committee with overall responsibility for climate change Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board
1.2. Do you provide incentives for the management of climate change issues, including the attainment of targets? No Yes Yes
11. Attachments NA NA NA
11. Further Information NA NA NA
11.1. What percentage of your total operational spend in the reporting year was on energy? More than 0% but less than or equal to 5% More than 0% but less than or equal to 5% More than 95% but less than or equal to 100%
12. Attachments NA
12. Further Information NA
12.1. How do your absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year compare to the previous year? Decreased
12.1a Reason of change Emissions reduction activities, Divestment, Acquisitions, Mergers, Change in output, Change in methodology, Change in boundary, Change in physical operating conditions, Unidentified, Other
14. Attachments NA NA NA
14. Further Information NA NA NA
14.1. Do you participate in any emission trading schemes? No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next two years No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next 2 years Yes
14.1b. What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? NA
14.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? No Yes Yes
2. Attachments NA NA NA
2. Further Information NA NA NA
2.1. Please select the option that best describes your risk management procedures with regard to climate change risks and opportunities NA Integrated into multi-disciplinary company wide risk management processes NA
2.1a. Please provide further details (see guidance) NA (i., ii., iii.)We have enacted a comprehensive cross functional program to address Corporate Risks including Climate Change risks in two distinct manners. We have included Climate Change risks within our annual Enterprise Risk Management process. The En NA
2.2. Is climate change integrated into your business strategy? No Yes Yes
2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes (see guidance) NA (i.)The risks and opportunities associated with Climate Change are integrated into the overall business strategy with oversight from the Environmental Affairs and Safety (EAS) Committee. The EAS Committee sets Corporate Responsibility (CR) goals and objec NA
2.2b. Please explain why not NA NA NA
2.3. Do you engage in activities that could either directly or indirectly influence policy on climate change through any of the following? (tick all that apply) No
2.3a. Please explain (i) the engagement process and (ii) actions you are advocating NA NA NA
2.3b. Are you on the Board of any trade associations or provide funding beyond membership? NA
2.3d. Do you publically disclose a list of all the research organizations that you fund? NA
3. Attachments NA NA NA
3. Further Information NA NA NA
3.1. Did you have an emissions reduction target that was active (ongoing or reached completion) in the reporting year? No Intensity target Absolute and intensity targets
3.1e. Please explain (i) why not; and (ii) forecast how your emissions will change over the next five years NA NA NA
3.2. Does the use of your goods and/or services directly enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party? No No Yes
3.2a. Please provide details (see guidance) NA NA NA
3.3c Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities. 0 2 13 Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities.
3.3c. What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities? NA Dedicated budget for energy efficiency, Lower return on investment (ROI) specification NA
4. Attachments NA
4. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? - Further Information NA
4.1. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? 2 The number of corporate annual reports and voluntary publications (complete and/or underway) made about the company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance
5. Attachments NA NA NA
5. Further Information NA NA NA
5.1. Have you identified any climate change risks (current or future) that have potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA NA NA
5.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA NA NA
5.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA NA NA
5.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA We understand that regulations effecting carbon and climate change have both direct and indirect impacts on our business. As our business is not energy intensive and our industry operates in similar fashions, we do not find these regulatory risks to be ma NA
5.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA We continue to assess the physical risks of climate change, but do not consider these effects to have the potential to substantively change our business. We realize that physical changes have the ability to affect the full lifecycle of our business, but c NA
5.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA We realize that risks driven by other climate-related developments may have the potential to affect our business, but in our current view, we do not feel that they have the potential to substantively change our business. As a prestige beauty company, our NA
6. Attachments NA NA NA
6. Further Information NA NA NA
6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA NA NA
6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? -Transparency No
6.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA NA NA
6.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA We do not expect that we would be materially affected by carbon and climate change regulations and we do not view these as presenting opportunities that would have the potential to substantively change our business. Regulations that increase energy costs NA
6.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA Changes in physical climate parameters present limited opportunities to substantively change our business operations, revenue or expenditure. Growing seasons for natural ingredients may expand and the climates where we manufacture may become more tempera NA
6.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA We do not anticipate that other climate-related developments have the potential to substantively change our business operations, revenue or expenditure. We understand that climate change has the potential to affect consumer behavior and that our reputati NA
7. Attachments NA NA NA
7. Further Information NA NA NA
8.2. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e NA Gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e for 2011 - 2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.3. Please provide your gross global Scope 2 emissions figures in metric tonnes CO2e NA
8.4. Are there are any sources (e.g. facilities, specific GHGs, activities, geographies, etc.) of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions which are not included in your disclosure? NA Yes NA Proportion of Scope 1 emissions that are verified/assured for 2011 - 2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
2013 Performance Band E A A NA
2013 Score 0 96 100 NA
0. Attachments NA NA NA If you have not been presented with a sector module that you consider would be appropriate for your company to answer, please select the module below. If you wish to view the questions first, please see https://www.cdproject.net/en-US/Programmes/Pages/Mor
0. Further Information NA NA NA If you are in these sectors (according to the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS)), the corresponding sector modules will be marked as default options to your information request. If you want to query your classification, please email respond@c
0.1. Introduction - Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. NA The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. is one of the world's leading manufacturers and marketers of prestige skin care, makeup, fragrance and hair care products. The Company's products are sold in more than 150 countries and territories under brand names includi NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
2014 Performance Band E A– A 2014 Performance Band
2014 Score 100 98 1 2014 Score
CDLI leader No Yes Yes The Climate Disclosure Leadership Index: A Company must: (1)   Make its response public and submit via CDP’s Online Response System (2) Achieve a score within the top 10% of the total regional sample population
Comment ŒŽ Comment
CPLI leader No No Yes The Climate Performance Leadership Inde: A company must: (1)Make its response public and submit via CDP’s Online Response System (2) Attain a performance score greater than (3) Disclose gross global Scope 1 and Scope 2 figures (4) Score maximum performanc
Scope 1 emissions 33242 All greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions that are directly from sources that are owned or controlled by the reporting entity.
Scope 2 emissions 57789 All indirect greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the consumption of purchased electricity, heat or steam. Indirect GHG emissions are a consequence of the activities of the reporting entity, but occur at sources owned or controlled by another entity.
Target(s) reported int Absolute/Intensive
Ticker EL Ticker
Verification/ assurance 123 Audit and verification by a competent and independent organization that uses a standardized set of terms and methods.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Reported Scope 3 Total (tCO2e) 670000000 44866 0 Indicated the total reported Scope 3 (all other indirect emissions) of the company in metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent (tCO2e) as defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol. Where no Scope 3 emissions are reported, this is recorded as "No Data"
Scope 1+2 Intensity 11162.43 11.07 0.3 Intensity is calculated by adding together a company's Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions and dividing by its turnover.
Global 800 Carbon Rank 800 205 1 Carbon Ranking of 800 international companies. Ranking is determined by EIO Methodology. See Source Info sheet for comments on it
No. of Scope 3 Categories Reported 1 1 15 This column indicates the number of Scope 3 Categories reported. Once placed into one of the four Disclosure Categories, companies are ranked by the number of Scope 3 categories disclosed.
Reported Scope 1+2 Total (tCO2e) 282000000 97510 843 The total reported Scope 1 (all direct emissions) and Scope 2 (indirect electricity emissions) of the company in metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent (tCO2e) as defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol
Accepted or Inferred Scope 3 Intensity 8547.13 856.03 64.51 Unless the company reports all 15 Scope 3 categories as defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Standard, an inferred figure based on the highest reported intensity for that sector, across the Global ET Universe, is shown
Category No Public Data Yellow Public, Complete, and Verified data Companies are placed into one of four data or 'disclosure' categories: 1) Public, Complete, and Verified data; 2) Public, Complete, and Unverified data; 3) Public, Incomplete, Verified or Unverified data; 4) No Public Data
Combined Scope 1+2+3 Intensity 12161.68 439.08 34.24 Combined Scope 1+2_3 Intensity is calculated by adding together a company's Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions at 100% (disclosed or inferred) + 50% of Scope 3 emissions (disclosed or inferred).
Market Value ($Million) 1667.87 14212 358143.1 A company's market value, or market capitalism (number of shares times x share price). This value was taken on 23.08.2011
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Size NA MNE NA NA
Region NA Northern America NA NA
Report Html Address NA http://www.elcompanies.com NA NA
Report Pdf Address NA http://www.elcompanies.com/PdfLibrary/2012%20ELC%20CR%20Report%20-%20The%20Beauty%20of%20Responsibility.pdf NA NA
Report reference IFC Performance Standards? NA No NA NA
Report reference ISO Standards? NA No NA NA
Report Title NA Corporate Sustainability Report 2012 NA NA
Sector NA Household and Personal Products NA NA
Sector Supplements (Final) NA Not Applicable NA NA
Application Level Undeclared Undeclared A+ G3 Application Levels indicate to which extent the GRI Guidelines have been utilized in the reporting and which set and number of disclosures have been addressed in the reporting. There are three Application Levels A, B and C.
Country (HQ) NA United States of America NA NA
Date Added To Sr List NA February 28, 2013 NA NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Industry Personal Products The company's industry sector
Public Note NA Comments on any public note about the statement
Sector Consumer Staples The company's industry sector
Statement http://www.esteelauder.com/cms/customer_service/supplier_relations.tmpl The company's statement location
Statement--Trasparency No Yes Yes Companies with a posted statement addressing at least three of the five SB-657 requirements are awarded a check mark.
Website http://www.esteelauder.com The company's web site
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Carbon Productivity 0.003 0.821 0.97 GHG Productivity defined as Revenue ($US) / Total Greenhouse gas (GHG) Emissions (CO2e).
Energy Productivity 0.021 0.725 0.971 Energy Productivity defined as Revenue ($US) / Total Energy Consumption (GJ).
Newsweek Green Score 0.014 0.528 0.851 This score is derived from the following component scores: an Energy Productivity,Carbon Productivity, Water Productivity, Waste Productivity, Reputation, Pay Link, Sustainability Themed Committee, Audit ; weighted at 45 percent, 45 percent, and 10 percen
Pay Link No Yes Yes A mechanism to link the remuneration of any member of a company's senior executive team with the achievement of environmental performance targets.
Rank 500 65 1
Reputation 0.005 0.483 1.0 The Reputation score is made up of two components: (1) The RepRisk Index, which is a quantitative measure that captures criticism and quantifies a company exposure to ESG risks. (2) The second component is based on the number of environmental issues that
Sustainability Themed Committee No Yes Yes The existence of a committee at the Board of Directors level whose mandate is related to the sustainability of the company, including but not limited to environmental matters.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Carbon Productivity 0.015 0.821 0.963 GHG Productivity defined as Revenue ($US) / Total Greenhouse gas (GHG) Emissions (CO2e).
Energy Productivity 0.007 0.725 0.957 Energy Productivity defined as Revenue ($US) / Total Energy Consumption (GJ).
Newsweek Green Score 0.0 0.528 0.843 This score is derived from the following component scores: an Energy Productivity,Carbon Productivity, Water Productivity, Waste Productivity, Reputation, Pay Link, Sustainability Themed Committee, Audit ; weighted at 45 percent, 45 percent, and 10 percen
Pay Link No Yes Yes A mechanism to link the remuneration of any member of a company's senior executive team with the achievement of environmental performance targets.
Rank 500 120 1
Reputation 0.005 0.483 1 The Reputation score is made up of two components: (1) The RepRisk Index, which is a quantitative measure that captures criticism and quantifies a company exposure to ESG risks. (2) The second component is based on the number of environmental issues that
Sustainability Themed Committee No Yes Yes The existence of a committee at the Board of Directors level whose mandate is related to the sustainability of the company, including but not limited to environmental matters.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Corporate Governance 3 0.6 0 The scores for each ESG scope issue ranges from 0-3. The scoring refers to the number of times the company was criticized in relation to that scope issue: 0 = little or no exposure in the past 4 years; 1 = 5 direct relations in the past 4 years; 2 = 10 direct relations in the past 4 years; 3 = 20 direct relations in the past 4 years.
Current RRI 86 28 0 The RepRisk Index (RRI) is a quantitative risk measure that captures criticism and quantifies a company's exposure to controversial environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues. It does not measure a company's overall reputation, but rather is an indicator of their reputational risk.The Current RRI value indicates the current level of criticism about a company.
Employee Relations 3 0.2 0 The scores for each ESG scope issue ranges from 0-3. The scoring refers to the number of times the company was criticized in relation to that scope issue: 0 = little or no exposure in the past 4 years; 1 = 5 direct relations in the past 4 years; 2 = 10 direct relations in the past 4 years; 3 = 20 direct relations in the past 4 years.
Environmental FootPrint 3 1.2 0 The scores for each ESG scope issue ranges from 0-3. The scoring refers to the number of times the company was criticized in relation to that scope issue: 0 = little or no exposure in the past 4 years; 1 = 5 direct relations in the past 4 years; 2 = 10 direct relations in the past 4 years; 3 = 20 direct relations in the past 4 years.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Rank 400 311 1 REPORTWATCH RATING
Report Rating D B A REPORTWATCH RATING
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
WEConnect International
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Weighted score 1.2 3.1 5.9

Flags

(Other Indicators - things that don’t affect ratings but that help identify or classify companies)

SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
You have put report(s) in your cart
Go to my cart
Ok