CSRHub is the world’s largest CSR (corporate social responsibility) and sustainability ratings and information database.

ConocoPhillips is a global energy company that finds, produces, refines, markets, and supplies energy resources. The Company is divided into four business segments: Exploration and Production; Refining, Marketing, Supply, and Transportation; Natural Gas Gathering, Processing, and Marketing; Chemicals and Plastics. Headquartered in Houston, Texas, ConocoPhillips has operations in the US, South America, Europe, Africa, Asia, and the Middle East.

Ticker: COP ISIN: US20825C1045
Address: 600 North Dairy Ashford , USA , Houston , TX , 77079 Website: ConocoPhillips
Phone #: 1-281-2931000 CSR Web Area: SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Basic Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Ratings

  Overall Community Employees Environment Governance
ConocoPhillips 55 52 54 58 53
Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber Products Mfg.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Oil and Gas Extraction
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Petroleum Refineries
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
All company average 55 55 56 58 52
USA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Percentile Rankings

Rankings are in percentile terms, compared to other companies in the same industry and country Overall Community Employees Environment Governance
ConocoPhillips 48% 35% 38% 48% 49%
Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber Products Mfg.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Oil and Gas Extraction
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Petroleum Refineries
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
USA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Ratings History

Only subscribers can interact with the graph.

More CSR Rating Details

  Community Employees
Community Dev & Philanthropy Product Human Rights & Supply Chain Compensation & Benefits Diversity & Labor Rights Training, Health & Safety
ConocoPhillips
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber Products Mfg.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Oil and Gas Extraction
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Petroleum Refineries
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
All company average 53 54 55 58 55 55
USA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Environment Governance
Energy & Climate Change Environmant Policy & Reporting Resource Management Board Leadership Ethics Transparency & Reporting
ConocoPhillips
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber Products Mfg.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Oil and Gas Extraction
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Petroleum Refineries
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
All company average 57 58 57 50 55 51
USA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Percentile rankings

Rankings are in percentile terms, compared to other companies in the same industry and country Community Employees
Community Dev & Philantrophy Product Human Rights & Supply Chain Compensation & Benefits Diversity & Labor Rights Training, Health & Safety
ConocoPhillips 47% 38% 29% 30% 25% 65%
Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber Products Mfg.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Oil and Gas Extraction
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Petroleum Refineries
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
USA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Environment Governance
Energy & Climate Change Environment Policy & Reporting Resource Management Board Leadership Ethics Transparency & Reporting
ConocoPhillips 50% 52% 44% 61% 31% 61%
Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber Products Mfg.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Oil and Gas Extraction
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Petroleum Refineries
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
USA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

3 Special Issues Affect This Company (see a list of issues here)

Military Contractor Fracking Involved Animal Test User
# of Sources 1 4 3
# of co. % of co. # of co. % of co. # of co. % of co.
Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber Products Mfg.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Oil and Gas Extraction
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Petroleum Refineries
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Overall database 756 8.1 58 0.6 115 1.2
USA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

CSRHub Has 78 Data Sources (49 Are Currently Active) for This Company

= sources impacting the current ratings
= sources not impacting the current ratings, but included in earlier ratings for this company
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Original Data Values

(unsubscribed users can see the list, subscribers can see the data details for most sources)

Data source name

Data source element name Minimum value Value provided by datasource Maximum value Data description
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Brand Value / Enterprise Value (%) -48.164682123 0.0616 316.6056 NA
Brand Value 2012 6690.427 NA
BSI 50 73.4765 88.4717 NA
Domicile UNITED STATES NA
Enterprise Value NA 108652.3 NA NA
Reviewed ? YES NA
Sector Energy NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Brand Value 2013 11.095 2125.1401 67875.2014 NA
BSI 50 73.4765 89.6275 NA
Domicile UNITED STATES NA
Sector Energy NA
Reviewed RY NA
Brand Rating 2013 BBB AA- AAA+ NA
Enterprise Value 2013 0 86902.1192 435750.9811
Brand Finance 2013-14
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Brand Value / Enterprise Value (%) 0.009 0.0577 1.07 NA
Brand Value 2014 10 5652.6669 87304 A brand strength is assessed by using our Brand Strength Index framework. This benchmarks the strength, risk and future potential of a brand relative to its competitors by assessing input measures, brand equity measures, and output performance across four
BSI 51.3 86 94.2 NA
Domicile UNITED STATES NA
Enterprise Value 2014 66 100567.2256 526619 NA
Sector Energy NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Proxy filed Yes NA
Proxy voting decisions for the company http://www.calpers-governance.org/proxyvoting/proxy/ticker-results?ticker=COP NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Proxy voting decisions for the company NA NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
0. Further Information NA ConocoPhillips greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the UK, Ireland, Germany and Norway are grouped together under the title "United Kingdom" for the purposes of this survey. GHG emissions from ConocoPhillips operations in China, Indonesia, Vietnam, and Ru NA NA
0.1. Introduction - Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. NA For the 2011 Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) reporting period, ConocoPhillips operated as an international, integrated energy company, employing approximately 30,000 employees worldwide. The company advanced work in four core areas in 2011: • Petrole NA NA
5.1e Identified climate change risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments? NA Yes NA NA
5.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA The following applies to all risks R-9 through R-10 unless otherwise specified i) Potential financial impact The potential financial implications associated with these two risk factors vary from low to medium impact. Reputation could influence the abili NA NA
5.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
5.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
5.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
6. Attachments NA NA NA NA
6. Further Information NA Additional information: Prior to May 1, 2012, ConocoPhillips (NYSE: COP) spun-off its downstream business to its shareholders through a new stand-alone publicly traded company, Phillips 66 (NYSE: PSX). ConocoPhillips has elected to discuss governance, s NA NA
6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Opportunities driven by changes in regulation; Opportunities driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA NA
6.1a Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in regulation? NA Yes NA NA
6.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA The following applies to all opportunities OP-1 through OP-5 unless otherwise specified i) Potential Financial Implications Whether international agreement, general environmental regulation, product efficiency regulation, carbon tax or cap and trade frame NA NA
6.1c Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in physical climate parameters? NA Yes NA NA
14. Attachments NA NA NA NA
6.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA The following applies to all opportunities OP-6 through OP-8 unless otherwise specified i) Potential Financial Implications Within each of these three extreme climate scenarios, there is potential opportunity to increase production of lower carbon intens NA NA
6.1e Identified opportunities that are driven by changes in other climate-related developments? NA Yes NA NA
6.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA The following applies to all opportunities OP-9 through OP-10 unless otherwise specifiedi) Potential Financial Implications(OP-9): We are committed to safe and responsible operations around the globe. Reputation is important to ConocoPhillips. Reputat NA NA
13. Attachments NA NA NA NA
11. Attachments NA NA NA NA
11. Further Information NA NA NA NA
11.1. Do you consider that the grid average factors used to report Scope 2 emissions in Question 8.3 reflect the contractual arrangements you have with electricity suppliers? NA Yes NA NA
11.1a. You may report a total contractual Scope 2 figure in response to this question. Please provide your total global contractual Scope 2 GHG emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 0 NA 17902000 NA
11.2. Has your organization retired any certificates, e.g. Renewable Energy Certificates, associated with zero or low carbon electricity within the reporting year or has this been done on your behalf? NA No NA NA
3.1e. Please explain (i) why not; and (ii) forecast how your emissions will change over the next five years NA NA NA NA
3.2. Does the use of your goods and/or services directly enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party? No Yes Yes NA
3.2a. Please provide details (see guidance) NA ConocoPhillips is committed to environmentally prudent development and production of natural gas as a clean fuel for power generation and heating. In 2011, the Company supplied consumers with 1.6 Trillion cubic feet (4.5 BCF/day) of natural gas. To put NA NA
3.3c Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities. 0 3 12 NA
3.3c. What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities? NA Compliance with regulatory requirements/standards, Financial optimization calculations, Dedicated budget for low carbon product R&D NA NA
5. Attachments NA NA NA NA
5. Further Information NA Prior to May 1, 2012, ConocoPhillips (NYSE: COP) spun-off its downstream business to its shareholders through a new stand-alone publicly traded company, Phillips 66 (NYSE: PSX). ConocoPhillips has elected to discuss governance, strategy, risks and opp NA NA
5.1. Have you identified any climate change risks (current or future) that have potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Risks driven by changes in regulation; Risks driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA NA
5.1a Identified risks driven by changes in regulation? NA Yes NA NA
5.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA The following applies to all risks R-1 through R-5 unless otherwise specified: i) Potential financial impact All five regulatory risks (R-1 through R-5) are similar in that each regulatory framework has a potential to increase operating cost and consu NA NA
14. Further Information NA Prior to May 1, 2012, ConocoPhillips (NYSE: COP) spun-off its downstream business to its shareholders through a new stand-alone publicly traded company, Phillips 66 (NYSE: PSX). Since ConocoPhillips operated as an integrated energy company in 2011, NA NA
1.1. Where is the highest level of direct responsibility for climate change within your company? No individual or committee with overall responsibility for climate change Senior Manager/Officer Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board NA
1.1a. Please identify the position of the individual or name of the committee with this responsibility NA Responsibility for managing climate change issues rests with the Executive Vice President, Exploration and Production and the Executive Vice President, Commercial, Business Development and Corporate Planning - two ConocoPhillips Executive Leadership Team NA NA
1.2. Do you provide incentives for the management of climate change issues, including the attainment of targets? No Yes Yes NA
13. Further Information NA Prior to May 1, 2012, ConocoPhillips (NYSE: COP) spun-off its downstream business to its shareholders through a new stand-alone publicly traded company, Phillips 66 (NYSE: PSX). Since ConocoPhillips operated as an integrated energy company in 2011, we NA NA
13.1. How do your absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year compare to the previous year? Increased Increased Decreased NA
13.1a (i) If absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) have increased, decreased or remained the same overall compared to the previous year, state direction of change NA Slightly Increased NA NA
13.1a (ii) If absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) have increased, decreased or remained the same overall compared to the previous year, state the reason for the direction of change NA Decrease: Change in output, Decrease: Emissions reduction activities, Increase: Change in output, Increase: Other NA NA
13.1a (iii) If emissions have increased, decreased or remained the same overall, provide the emissions value (%) NA Decrease: , Increase: , Emission value for which direction is not stated: NA NA
2012 Score 0 81 100 NA
2012 Performance Band E C A NA
2.3a. Please explain (i) the engagement process and (ii) actions you are advocating NA Public Policy Position We believe that over the months and years ahead, governments – federal, state/provincial and local – will act upon the issue of global climate change. In order to succeed in a low carbon economy, ConocoPhillips must play a construc NA NA
8.8. Are carbon dioxide emissions from the combustion of biologically sequestered carbon (i.e. carbon dioxide emissions from burning biomass/biofuels) relevant to your company? No No Yes NA
8.8a. Please provide the emissions in metric tonnes CO2e 0.01 NA 27263000 NA
Management 4. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/51/3751/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/4.Communication/NG Responsible Development and Production.pdf NA NA
Management 4. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? NA 12 NA NA
5.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA The following applies to all risks R-6 through R-8 unless otherwise specified: i) Potential financial impact(All): According to USEPA, climatologists have reached a consensus that a doubling of CO2 could warm the Earth 1.5-4.5°C (3-8°F), which could leav NA NA
2. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/51/3751/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/2.Strategy/Methane Hydrates Press Release.pdf NA NA
2. Further Information NA Prior to May 1, 2012, ConocoPhillips (NYSE: COP) spun-off its downstream business to its shareholders through a new stand-alone publicly traded company, Phillips 66 (NYSE: PSX). ConocoPhillips has elected to discuss governance, strategy, risks and opp NA NA
5.1c Identified climate change risks driven by change in physical climate parameters? NA Yes NA NA
2.1. Please select the option that best describes your risk management procedures with regard to climate change risks and opportunities NA Integrated into multi-disciplinary company wide risk management processes NA NA
2.1a. Please provide further details (see guidance) NA i. Scope of the process Our process for assessing risk and opportunity related to climate change includes consideration of:• New and evolving GHG/energy policy and regulation• Social risk and issues• Reputation• Commercial factors influencing long-term c NA NA
2.2. Is climate change integrated into your business strategy? No Yes Yes NA
2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes (see guidance) NA Influence on business strategyConocoPhillips has a corporate reporting process that ensures GHG emissions are fully understood and reported at the asset, business unit and corporate levels of the company. Major capital projects must support the cost of c NA NA
2.2b. Please explain why not NA NA NA NA
2.3. Do you engage with policy makers to encourage further action on mitigation and/or adaptation? No Yes Yes NA
3. Attachments NA NA NA NA
3. Further Information NA Prior to May 1, 2012, ConocoPhillips (NYSE: COP) spun-off its downstream business to its shareholders through a new stand-alone publicly traded company, Phillips 66 (NYSE: PSX). As the CDP requests information for the 2011 calendar year when the upstream NA NA
3.1. Did you have an emissions reduction target that was active (ongoing or reached completion) in the reporting year? No Absolute and intensity targets Absolute and intensity targets NA
14.1. Do you participate in any emission trading schemes? No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next two years Yes Yes NA
14.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? No Yes Yes NA
6.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
6.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
6.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
7. Attachments NA NA NA NA
7. Further Information NA Prior to May 1, 2012, ConocoPhillips (NYSE: COP) spun-off its downstream business to its shareholders through a new stand-alone publicly traded company, Phillips 66 (NYSE: PSX). Since ConocoPhillips operated as an integrated energy company in 2011, NA NA
7.1. Please provide your base year and base year emissions (Scopes 1 and 2) NA NA NA NA
0.4. Currency selection Please select the currency in which you would like to submit your response. All financial information contained in the response should be in this currency. NA USD($) NA NA
1. Attachments NA NA NA NA
1. Further Information NA Prior to May 1, 2012, ConocoPhillips (NYSE: COP) spun-off its downstream business to its shareholders through a new stand-alone publicly traded company, Phillips 66 (NYSE: PSX). ConocoPhillips has elected to discuss governance, strategy, risks and oppor NA NA
8.7. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 2 emissions More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% NA More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% NA
11.1b. Explain the basis of the alternative figure (see guidance) NA NA
14.1b. What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? For the facilities in which we operate, ConocoPhillips' strategy is to invest in on-site energy efficiency projects to directly reduce GHG emissions thereby reducing our long-term compliance costs (either by generating emission performance credits or simp NA
8.1. Please select the boundary you are using for your Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas inventory NA NA NA NA
8.2a. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 92 NA 231902967 NA
8.3a. Please provide your gross global Scope 2 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 293 NA 8071070 NA
8.4. Are there are any sources (e.g. facilities, specific GHGs, activities, geographies, etc.) of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions which are not included in your disclosure? NA No NA NA
8.6. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 1 emissions More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% NA More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
8.8a. Please provide the emissions in metric tonnes CO2e 0.05 NA 13638000
0.4. Currency selection Please select the currency in which you would like to submit your response. All financial information contained in the response should be in this currency. USD($)
0.6. Modules NA As part of the Investor CDP information request, electric utilities, companies with electric utility activities or assets, companies in the automobile or auto component manufacture sectors and companies in the oil and gas industry should complete suppleme
1. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/sites/2013/51/3751/Investor CDP 2013/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2013/1.Governance/SPIRIT.pdf NA
1. Further Information NA See attached SPIRIT Magazine article for question 1.2a. NA
1.1. Where is the highest level of direct responsibility for climate change within your company? No individual or committee with overall responsibility for climate change Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board
1.2. Do you provide incentives for the management of climate change issues, including the attainment of targets? No Yes Yes
11. Attachments NA NA NA
11. Further Information NA NA NA
11.1. What percentage of your total operational spend in the reporting year was on energy? More than 0% but less than or equal to 5% More than 0% but less than or equal to 5% More than 95% but less than or equal to 100%
12. Attachments NA
12. Further Information Not reflected in the percentages in Table 12.1a is improved estimation of 2011 combustion emissions based on actual fuel volume data for diesel fuel usage instead of vendor-supplied emission estimates. Using improved data, 2011 baseline emissions were 26
12.1. How do your absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year compare to the previous year? Decreased
12.1a Reason of change Emissions reduction activities, Divestment, Acquisitions, Mergers, Change in output, Change in methodology, Change in boundary, Change in physical operating conditions, Unidentified, Other
14. Attachments NA NA NA
14. Further Information NA NA NA
14.1. Do you participate in any emission trading schemes? No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next two years Yes Yes
14.1b. What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? For the facilities in which we operate, ConocoPhillips' strategy is to invest in on-site energy efficiency projects to directly reduce GHG emissions thereby reducing our long-term compliance costs (either by generating emission performance credits or simp
14.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? No Yes Yes
2. Attachments NA NA NA
2. Further Information NA We were represented on the board of the US Chamber of Commerce in 2012. NA
2.1. Please select the option that best describes your risk management procedures with regard to climate change risks and opportunities NA Integrated into multi-disciplinary company wide risk management processes NA
2.1a. Please provide further details (see guidance) NA i. Scope of the process Our process for assessing risk and opportunity related to climate change includes consideration of:• New and evolving GHG/energy policy and regulation• Social risk and issues• Reputation• Commercial factors influencing long-term c NA
2.2. Is climate change integrated into your business strategy? No Yes Yes
2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes (see guidance) NA Influence on business strategyConocoPhillips has a corporate reporting process that ensures GHG emissions are fully understood and reported at the asset, business unit and corporate levels of the company. Low carbon scenarios are integrated into the Stra NA
2.2b. Please explain why not NA NA NA
2.3. Do you engage in activities that could either directly or indirectly influence policy on climate change through any of the following? (tick all that apply) Yes
2.3a. Please explain (i) the engagement process and (ii) actions you are advocating NA NA NA
2.3b. Are you on the Board of any trade associations or provide funding beyond membership? Yes
2.3d. Do you publically disclose a list of all the research organizations that you fund? Yes
3. Attachments NA NA NA
3. Further Information NA Projects are executed based on technical and economic feasibility. Average payback for projects is roughly two years. NA
3.1. Did you have an emissions reduction target that was active (ongoing or reached completion) in the reporting year? No Absolute and intensity targets Absolute and intensity targets
3.1e. Please explain (i) why not; and (ii) forecast how your emissions will change over the next five years NA NA NA
3.2. Does the use of your goods and/or services directly enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party? No Yes Yes
3.2a. Please provide details (see guidance) NA ConocoPhillips is committed to environmentally prudent development and production of natural gas as a clean fuel for power generation and heating. In 2012, the Company supplied consumers with 1.5 Trillion cubic feet (4.2 BCF/day) of natural gas. To put NA
3.3c Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities. 0 3 13 Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities.
3.3c. What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities? NA Compliance with regulatory requirements/standards, Financial optimization calculations, Dedicated budget for low carbon product R&D NA
4. Attachments NA
4. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? - Further Information 2012 Performance metrics will be available to the public June 30, 2013 as part of a major revamp of the ConocoPhillips.com website.
4.1. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? 8 The number of corporate annual reports and voluntary publications (complete and/or underway) made about the company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance
5. Attachments NA NA NA
5. Further Information NA NA NA
5.1. Have you identified any climate change risks (current or future) that have potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Risks driven by changes in regulation; Risks driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA
5.1a. Climate change risks driven by changes in regulation Yes
5.1c. Climate change risks driven by change in physical climate parameters Yes
5.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA The following applies to all risks R-6 through R-8 unless otherwise specified: i) Potential financial impact(All): According to USEPA, climatologists have reached a consensus that a doubling of CO2 could warm the Earth 1.5-4.5°C (3-8°F). Global warming NA
5.1e.Climate change risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments Yes
5.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA The following applies to all risks R-9 through R-10 unless otherwise specified i) Potential financial impact The potential financial implications associated with these two risk factors vary from low to medium impact. Reputation could influence the abili NA
5.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
5.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
5.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
6. Attachments NA NA NA
6. Further Information NA NA NA
6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Opportunities driven by changes in regulation; Opportunities driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA
6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? -Transparency Yes
6.1a Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in regulation? NA Yes NA
6.1c. Please describe the opportunities that are driven by changes in physical climate parameters Yes
6.1e. Please describe the opportunities that are driven by changes in other climate-related developments Yes
6.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA The following applies to all opportunities OP-9 through OP-10 unless otherwise specifiedi) Potential Financial Implications(OP-9): We are committed to safe and responsible operations around the globe. Reputation is important to ConocoPhillips. Reputat NA
6.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
6.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
6.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
7. Attachments NA NA NA
7. Further Information NA Prior to May 1, 2012, ConocoPhillips (NYSE: COP) spun-off its downstream business to its shareholders through a new stand-alone publicly traded company, Phillips 66 (NYSE: PSX). To allow comparisons with performance data from prior years, ConocoPhillips h NA
8.2. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e NA Gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e for 2011 - 2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.3. Please provide your gross global Scope 2 emissions figures in metric tonnes CO2e NA
8.4. Are there are any sources (e.g. facilities, specific GHGs, activities, geographies, etc.) of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions which are not included in your disclosure? NA No NA Proportion of Scope 1 emissions that are verified/assured for 2011 - 2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
2013 Performance Band E B A NA
2013 Score 0 83 100 NA
0. Attachments NA NA NA If you have not been presented with a sector module that you consider would be appropriate for your company to answer, please select the module below. If you wish to view the questions first, please see https://www.cdproject.net/en-US/Programmes/Pages/Mor
0. Further Information NA In this Section, the CDP reporting form does not have a "Europe" pick on the drop-down menu for Question 0.3. Therefore, ConocoPhillips is using the "United Kingdom" pick to represent its combined operations in the UK, Norway and Poland. The CDP has a NA If you are in these sectors (according to the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS)), the corresponding sector modules will be marked as default options to your information request. If you want to query your classification, please email respond@c
0.1. Introduction - Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. NA ConocoPhillips explores for, produces, transports and markets crude oil, natural gas, natural gas liquids, liquefied natural gas and bitumen on a worldwide basis with operations and activities in 30 countries as of December 31, 2012. The portfolio includ NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
2014 Performance Band E B A 2014 Performance Band
2014 Score 100 89 1 2014 Score
CDLI leader No No Yes The Climate Disclosure Leadership Index: A Company must: (1)   Make its response public and submit via CDP’s Online Response System (2) Achieve a score within the top 10% of the total regional sample population
Comment ŒŽ Comment
CPLI leader No No Yes The Climate Performance Leadership Inde: A company must: (1)Make its response public and submit via CDP’s Online Response System (2) Attain a performance score greater than (3) Disclose gross global Scope 1 and Scope 2 figures (4) Score maximum performanc
Scope 1 emissions 25761226 All greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions that are directly from sources that are owned or controlled by the reporting entity.
Scope 2 emissions 1625188 All indirect greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the consumption of purchased electricity, heat or steam. Indirect GHG emissions are a consequence of the activities of the reporting entity, but occur at sources owned or controlled by another entity.
Target(s) reported abs int Absolute/Intensive
Ticker COP Ticker
Verification/ assurance 123 Audit and verification by a competent and independent organization that uses a standardized set of terms and methods.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Ask NA 1.Set GHG goals for products & ops and report plans. 2. Report on environmental damage of oil sands operations.3. Climate risk review and report. 4. Report on accident risk mitigation NA Resolutions are part of broader investor efforts encouraging companies to address the full range of environmental, social and governance issues
Rating omitted filed withdrawn Shareholder resolutions filed by our investor network participants on sustainability-related issues that companies are facing
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Disclosure (Percent of Max 23 points) 0 52 100 NA
Grand Total (Percent of Max 69 points) 0 59 100 NA
Policies (Percent of Max 18 points) 0 94 100 NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Rank 100 91 1 NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Rank 1 93 100 NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Reported Scope 3 Total (tCO2e) 670000000 - 0 Indicated the total reported Scope 3 (all other indirect emissions) of the company in metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent (tCO2e) as defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol. Where no Scope 3 emissions are reported, this is recorded as "No Data"
Scope 1+2 Intensity 11162.43 286.1 0.3 Intensity is calculated by adding together a company's Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions and dividing by its turnover.
Global 800 Carbon Rank 800 270 1 Carbon Ranking of 800 international companies. Ranking is determined by EIO Methodology. See Source Info sheet for comments on it
No. of Scope 3 Categories Reported 1 - 15 This column indicates the number of Scope 3 Categories reported. Once placed into one of the four Disclosure Categories, companies are ranked by the number of Scope 3 categories disclosed.
Reported Scope 1+2 Total (tCO2e) 282000000 65963419 843 The total reported Scope 1 (all direct emissions) and Scope 2 (indirect electricity emissions) of the company in metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent (tCO2e) as defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol
Accepted or Inferred Scope 3 Intensity 8547.13 6319.81 64.51 Unless the company reports all 15 Scope 3 categories as defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Standard, an inferred figure based on the highest reported intensity for that sector, across the Global ET Universe, is shown
Category No Public Data Yellow Public, Complete, and Verified data Companies are placed into one of four data or 'disclosure' categories: 1) Public, Complete, and Verified data; 2) Public, Complete, and Unverified data; 3) Public, Incomplete, Verified or Unverified data; 4) No Public Data
Combined Scope 1+2+3 Intensity 12161.68 3446.01 34.24 Combined Scope 1+2_3 Intensity is calculated by adding together a company's Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions at 100% (disclosed or inferred) + 50% of Scope 3 emissions (disclosed or inferred).
Market Value ($Million) 1667.87 70394 358143.1 A company's market value, or market capitalism (number of shares times x share price). This value was taken on 23.08.2011
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Description At ConocoPhillips responsibly delivering energy to the world is just the beginning. As an international integrated energy company ConocoPhillips realizes the extent of its global impact which is why the company conducts its business in a safe environmenta Description of the company's product.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Sum of Biogenic CO2 emissions 2.9 388004.1 23623772.5 Total biogenic CO2 emissions.
Sum of CO2 emissions (non-biogenic) 0.3 250792 53858607.2 Total non-biogenic CO2 emissions
Sum of Gases with No Listed GWP (metric tons) 0.3397 NA 1036.4
Sum of HFC emissions 2558.79 NA 19215.8
Sum of HFE emissions NA NA
Sum of Methane (CH4) emissions 0.21 19813.5 2491216.14 Total methane emissions
Sum of NF3 emissions 5332 NA 21231.68
Sum of Nitrous Oxide (N2O) emissions 0.31 8661.4 10675387.54
Sum of PFC emissions 33930.1 NA 1221318.27
Sum of SF6 emissions 4254.2 NA 153581.4
Total reported direct emissions 30.03 279266.9 54200390.452 Total emissions of CO2 and other gases in metric tons.
Industry Description NA NA Description of the type of industry the facility serves.
Is Some CO2 captured on-site and therefore not emitted? N NA Y Indicates if all CO2 is emitted or if some is sequestered.
Number of reporting facilities 1 3 50 Number of facilities reported to the EPA.
Percentage of facilities that emit pollutants 2 66.6667 100 Percent of reporting facilities that emit pollutants other than CO2.
Percentage of facilities that employ continuous emissions monitoring 6 33.3333 100
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
ceo:numberOfRatings 1 45 4026 The number of ratings of the CEO
ceo:pctApprove 0 96 100 Percent of ratings of the CEO that were approving
ceo:title NA The title of the company's CEO
employer:numberOfRatings 1 240 6549 The number of Glassdoor users who have rated this company as a place to work.
Glassdoor Employer Ratings 1 3.5 5 The Top Companies for Work-Life Balance list is based on employee feedback shared in company reviews on Glassdoor.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Executive Diversity 0 0.11 0.41 Percentage of officers and directors that are female.
Percentage of Profit 0 0.017 1.086 Percentage of profit donated.
Rank 500 145 1 NA
Toxicity produced 773771631 0 0 In pounds.
Toxicity released 113515588 0 0 In pounds.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Size NA Large NA NA
Region NA Northern America NA NA
Report Html Address NA http://www.coNocophillips.com/EN/susdev/Pages/index.aspx NA NA
Report Pdf Address NA NA NA NA
Report reference IFC Performance Standards? NA No NA NA
Report reference ISO Standards? NA No NA NA
Report Title NA Sustainability Report NA NA
Sector NA Energy NA NA
Sector Supplements (Final) NA NA NA NA
Application Level Undeclared Undeclared A+ G3 Application Levels indicate to which extent the GRI Guidelines have been utilized in the reporting and which set and number of disclosures have been addressed in the reporting. There are three Application Levels A, B and C.
Country (HQ) NA United States of America NA NA
Date Added To Sr List NA March 27, 2013 NA NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Guidelines NA GRI - G3.1 NA This field indicates which version of the GRI Guidelines is used for the reporting. As of publication year 2009, GRI only includes reporting that makes use of the G3 Guidelines, which were released in October 2006.
Integrated No No Yes GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
Publication Year 2013 GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
Region NA Northern America NA Region the organization operates in.
Report Html Address NA http://www.conocophillips.com/sustainable-development/reporting/Pages/about-the-report.aspx NA URL of the report location.
Report Pdf Address NA http://www.conocophillips.com/sustainable-development/Documents/2013.12.17%201200%20SD%20Final.pdf NA Location of a PDF version of the report.
Report Title NA 2012 Sustainability Report NA Title of the report.
Sector NA Energy NA Industry sector.
Sector Supplements (Final) NA Oil & Gas NA This field indicates if the reporting organization has made use of one of the final Sector Supplements and which one. If ‘not used’ is indicated, it means that one of the final Sector Supplements is applicable, but has not been used. If ‘not applicable’ i
Size NA Large NA GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Industry Oil and Gas Exploration and Production The company's industry sector
Public Note NA Comments on any public note about the statement
Sector Energy The company's industry sector
Statement http://www.conocophillips.com/sustainable-development/people-society/respecting-human-rights/Documents/California%20Transparency%20in%20Supply%20Chains.pdf The company's statement location
Statement--Trasparency No Yes Yes Companies with a posted statement addressing at least three of the five SB-657 requirements are awarded a check mark.
Website http://www.conocophillips.com/Pages/default.aspx The company's web site
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Disclosure 0 70.6 100 Environmental disclosure was included as a stand-alone score to assess each company’s transparency with regard to its environmental performance. Specifically, this score evaluates the breadth and quality of company environmen
Green Score 21.4 48.7 82.9 NA
Envtl. Mgmt. 21.3 44.7 91.9 Based on an analysis of companies tracked in Sustainalytics’ Global Platform, the Environmental Management Score is an assessment of how a company manages its environmental performance through policies, programs, targets, certifications, and the like. To
Envtl. Impact 0 47.9 89 Based on data compiled by Trucost, this is a comprehensive, quantitative, and standardized measurement of the overall environmental impact of a company’s global operations. More than 700 metrics—including emissions of nine key greenhouse gases, water use,
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Carbon Productivity 0.003 0.364 0.97 GHG Productivity defined as Revenue ($US) / Total Greenhouse gas (GHG) Emissions (CO2e).
Energy Productivity 0.021 0.178 0.971 Energy Productivity defined as Revenue ($US) / Total Energy Consumption (GJ).
Newsweek Green Score 0.014 0.454 0.851 This score is derived from the following component scores: an Energy Productivity,Carbon Productivity, Water Productivity, Waste Productivity, Reputation, Pay Link, Sustainability Themed Committee, Audit ; weighted at 45 percent, 45 percent, and 10 percen
Pay Link No Yes Yes A mechanism to link the remuneration of any member of a company's senior executive team with the achievement of environmental performance targets.
Rank 500 117 1
Reputation 0.005 0.148 1.0 The Reputation score is made up of two components: (1) The RepRisk Index, which is a quantitative measure that captures criticism and quantifies a company exposure to ESG risks. (2) The second component is based on the number of environmental issues that
Sustainability Themed Committee No Yes Yes The existence of a committee at the Board of Directors level whose mandate is related to the sustainability of the company, including but not limited to environmental matters.
Waste Productivity 0.014 0.289 0.97 Waste Productivity is defined as Revenue ($US) / [Total waste generated (metric tonnes) – waste recycled/reused (metric tonnes)].
Water Productivity 0.028 0.668 0.992 Water Productivity is defined as Revenue ($US) / Total water use (m3).
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Envtl. Mgmt. 28.6 44.7 91.9 Based on an analysis of companies tracked in Sustainalytics’ Global Platform, the Environmental Management Score is an assessment of how a company manages its environmental performance through policies, programs, targets, certifications, and the like. To
Green Score 0 48.7 100 NA
Rank 500 425 1 NA
Disclosure 0 70.6 100 Environmental disclosure was included as a stand-alone score to assess each company’s transparency with regard to its environmental performance. Specifically, this score evaluates the breadth and quality of company environmen
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Carbon Productivity 0.015 0.364 0.963 GHG Productivity defined as Revenue ($US) / Total Greenhouse gas (GHG) Emissions (CO2e).
Energy Productivity 0.007 0.178 0.957 Energy Productivity defined as Revenue ($US) / Total Energy Consumption (GJ).
Newsweek Green Score 0.0 0.454 0.843 This score is derived from the following component scores: an Energy Productivity,Carbon Productivity, Water Productivity, Waste Productivity, Reputation, Pay Link, Sustainability Themed Committee, Audit ; weighted at 45 percent, 45 percent, and 10 percen
Pay Link No Yes Yes A mechanism to link the remuneration of any member of a company's senior executive team with the achievement of environmental performance targets.
Rank 500 188 1
Reputation 0.005 0.148 1 The Reputation score is made up of two components: (1) The RepRisk Index, which is a quantitative measure that captures criticism and quantifies a company exposure to ESG risks. (2) The second component is based on the number of environmental issues that
Sustainability Themed Committee No Yes Yes The existence of a committee at the Board of Directors level whose mandate is related to the sustainability of the company, including but not limited to environmental matters.
Waste Productivity 0.014 0.289 0.97 Waste Productivity is defined as Revenue ($US) / [Total waste generated (metric tonnes) – waste recycled/reused (metric tonnes)].
Water Productivity 0.012 0.668 0.992 Water Productivity is defined as Revenue ($US) / Total water use (m3).
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Corporate Governance 3 3 0 The scores for each ESG scope issue ranges from 0-3. The scoring refers to the number of times the company was criticized in relation to that scope issue: 0 = little or no exposure in the past 4 years; 1 = 5 direct relations in the past 4 years; 2 = 10 direct relations in the past 4 years; 3 = 20 direct relations in the past 4 years.
Current RRI 86 23 0 The RepRisk Index (RRI) is a quantitative risk measure that captures criticism and quantifies a company's exposure to controversial environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues. It does not measure a company's overall reputation, but rather is an indicator of their reputational risk.The Current RRI value indicates the current level of criticism about a company.
Employee Relations 3 2.8 0 The scores for each ESG scope issue ranges from 0-3. The scoring refers to the number of times the company was criticized in relation to that scope issue: 0 = little or no exposure in the past 4 years; 1 = 5 direct relations in the past 4 years; 2 = 10 direct relations in the past 4 years; 3 = 20 direct relations in the past 4 years.
Environmental FootPrint 3 3 0 The scores for each ESG scope issue ranges from 0-3. The scoring refers to the number of times the company was criticized in relation to that scope issue: 0 = little or no exposure in the past 4 years; 1 = 5 direct relations in the past 4 years; 2 = 10 direct relations in the past 4 years; 3 = 20 direct relations in the past 4 years.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Rank 400 386 1 REPORTWATCH RATING
Report Rating D B- A REPORTWATCH RATING
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Value of USG Contracts (in millions) 990 1.7 1 Value of Iranian contracts.
Withdrawn NA Was the association with Iran withdrawn?
Nationality USA Country the company is in.
On the list Yes Yes Is the company on the list.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Women's Business Enterprise National Council (WBENC)
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Weighted score 1.2 3.8 5.9

Flags

(Other Indicators - things that don’t affect ratings but that help identify or classify companies)

SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
You have put report(s) in your cart
Go to my cart
Ok