| AccountAbility | Top 100 most accountable companies according to AccountAbility | 11.2 | 61.1 | 77.7 |
| Best Workplace for Commuters | Best Workplace for Commuters list | | Yes | Yes |
| BlackEngineer Most Admired Companies 2009 | Most Admired Companies for Minority Professionals in 2009 | 70 | 21 | 1 |
| BSR Member | Companies that are committed to improving its sustainability performance may join BSR | | Yes | Yes |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 Full Data | % of purchased electricity from renewable sources | no response | 2.270% | answered |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 Full Data | (i) Has the information reported in response to Questions 2(b)- (c) been externally verified or audited or do you plan to have the information verified or audited?
| no response | Yes (Please go to 2(d)(ii)) | answered |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 Full Data | Do you assess or provide incentive mechanisms for individual management of climate change issues including attainment of GHG targets? If so, please provide details.
| no response | Yes, we do. | answered |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 Full Data | Do you engage with policymakers on possible responses to climate change including taxation, regulation and carbon trading? If so, please provide details.
| no response | Yes | answered |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 Full Data | Do you forecast your company’s future emissions and/or energy use?
| no response | Yes, we do. (Please answer questions (i) to (iii) below.) | answered |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 Full Data | Do you invest in, or have plans to invest in products and services that are designed to minimize or adapt to the effects of climate change?
| no response | Climate change has led to investment or planned investment in order to maximise climate change opportunities. | answered |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 Full Data | Does a Board Committee or other executive body have overall responsibility for climate change? If not, please state how overall responsibility for climate change is managed. If so, please answer parts (i) and (ii) below.
| no response | Yes, an executive body does have overall responsibility for climate change. | answered |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 Full Data | Does your company have a system in place to assess the accuracy of GHG emissions inventory calculation methods, data processes and other systems relating to GHG measurement? If so, please provide details. If not, please explain how data accuracy is manag | no response | Yes, we do have a system. | answered |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 Full Data | General and regulatory risks management
| no response | We have taken or planned action. | answered |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 Full Data | i) Does your company have a GHG emissions reduction plan in place? If so, please provide details along with the information requested below. If there is currently no plan in place, please explain why.
| no response | Yes, we have a reduction plan in place. (Please proceed to part (ii) ) | answered |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 Full Data | ii) formal communications with shareholders or external parties
| no response | Yes | answered |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 Full Data | iii) Has your company developed emissions intensity targets?
| no response | No, we have not developed emission intensity targets for the following reason(s): | answered |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 Full Data | iii) voluntary communications such as Corporate Social Responsibility reporting
| no response | Yes | answered |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 Full Data | Please indicate whether you publish information about the risks and opportunities presented to your company by climate change, details of your GHG emissions and plans to reduce emissions through any of the following communications: i) the company’s Annual | no response | Yes | answered |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 Full Data | Please specify the methodology used by your company to calculate GHG emissions.
| no response | GHG Protocol | answered |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 Full Data | Response State | | Answered questionnaire online | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 Full Data | Section 2 Index | | 714 | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 Full Data | Section 3 Index | | 605 | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 Full Data | Section 4 Index | | 558 | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 2.1. Further Information | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 2.1. Physical Risks | | We consider our company to be exposed to physical risks. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 20.1. Select currency | | United States dollar | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 20.1. The total cost of electricity, heat, steam and cooling purchased by your company. | | 371000000 | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 20.1.1. Cooling | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 20.1.1. Cooling - Currency | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 20.1.1. Electricity - Currency | | United States dollar | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 20.1.1. Heat | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 20.1.1. Heat - Currency | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 20.1.1. Please break down the costs by individual energy type. - Electricity | | 371000000 | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 20.1.1. Steam | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 20.1.1. Steam - Currency | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 20.2. Select currency | | United States dollar | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 20.2. The total cost of fuel purchased by your company for mobile and stationary combustion. | | 33723000 | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 20.3 Your company’s total consumption of purchased energy in MWh. | | 4037248 | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 20.4. In answering this question and the one below, you will have used either Higher Heating Values (also known as Gross Calorific Values) or Lower Heating Values (also known as Net Calorific Values). | | Lower Heating Values were used for diesel.
Natural gas was converted from Therms. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 20.4. Your company’s total consumption in MWh of fuels for stationary combustion only. This includes purchased fuels, as well as biomass and self-produced fuels where relevant. | | 497267 | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 20.5. What is the total amount of energy generated in MWh from the fuels reported in question 20.4? | | 0 | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 20.6. What is the total amount in MWh of renewable energy, excluding biomass, that is self-generated by your company? | | 100 | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 20.7. What percentage of the energy reported in response to question 20.5 is exported/sold by your company to the grid or to third parties? | | 0 | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 20.8. Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 20.8. Further information | | Note that HP either generated or purchased 101,900 MWhs of renewable energy but only some of that energy was generated from intstallations at HP facilities. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 20.8. What percentage of the renewable energy reported in response to question 20.6 is exported/sold by your company to the grid or to third parties? | | 0 | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 21.1. Does your company operate or have ownership of facilities covered by the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS)? | No (Please go to question 22.) | No (Please go to question 22.) | Yes (Please answer the following questions - 21.2 to 21.4) |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 21.2. 2009 | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 21.2. 2010 | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 21.2. 2011 | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 21.2. 2012 | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 21.2. The allowances allocated for free for each year of Phase II for facilities which you operate or own. (Even if you do not wholly own facilities, please give the full number of allowances). - Year 2008 | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 21.3. The total allowances purchased through national auctioning processes for the period 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2008 for facilities that you operate or own. (Even if you do not wholly own facilities, please give the total allowances purchased thro | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 21.4. Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 21.4. Further information | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 21.4. Total CO2 emissions for 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2008 for facilities which you operate or own as a % of total revenue. | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 22.1. More information | | The Carbon Reduction Commitment (CRC) in the U.K. will begin operating in April 2010. The CRC is a new mandatory emissions trading scheme that aims to improve energy efficiency and reduce the amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) emitted in the UK. Organizatio | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 22.1. Please provide details of any emissions trading schemes, other than the EU ETS, in which your company already participates or is likely to participate within the next two years. | We do not participate or anticipate participating in any trading schemes within the next two years. (Please go to question 22.3) | We participate or anticipate participating in trading schemes other than the EU ETS in the next two years. | We participate or anticipate participating in trading schemes other than the EU ETS in the next two years. |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 22.2. Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 22.2. Further information | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 22.2. What is your overall strategy for complying with any schemes in which you are required or have elected to participate, including the EU ETS? | | This is a new regulation that is not in force yet. However, HP and EDS are developing a joint compliance plan across their offices and data center operations. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 22.3. Have you purchased any project-based carbon credits? | No. (Please go to question 22.5) | No. (Please go to question 22.5) | Yes. (Please answer the following questions) |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 22.3. Please indicate whether the credits are to meet one or more of the following commitments: | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 22.4 Provide details including the type of unit, volume and vintage purchased and the standard/scheme against which the credits have been verified, issued and retired (where applicable). | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 22.5. Have you been involved in the origination of project-based carbon credits? | No. (Please go to question 22.7) | No. (Please go to question 22.7) | Yes. (Please answer the following question) |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 22.6. Please provide details including:
• Your role in the project(s),
• The locations and technologies involved,
• The standard/scheme under which the projects are being/have been developed,
• Whether emissions reductions have been validated or verified, | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 22.7. Are you involved in the trading of allowances under the EU ETS and/or project-based carbon credits as a separate business activity, or in direct support of a business activity such as investment fund management or the provision of offsetting service | No. (Please go to question 23) | No. (Please go to question 23) | Yes. (Please answer the following question) |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 22.8. Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 22.8. Further information | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 22.8. Please provide details of the role performed. | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 23.1. Does your company have a GHG emissions and/or energy reduction plan in place? | No. (Please answer the following question and then continue with 23.3) | Yes. (Please go to question 23.3) | Yes. (Please go to question 23.3) |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 23.10. Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 23.10. Further information | | Numbers are approximate. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 23.10. What emissions reductions, energy savings and associated cost savings have been achieved to date as a result of the plan and/or the activities described above? Please state the methodology and data sources you have used for calculating these reduct | | HP has achieved significant reductions to date. Question 23.8 outlines a number of activities and their associated emissions and cost savings.
For HP operations alone (not including EDS), GHG emissions from our primary operations decrease | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 23.13. Please estimate your company’s future Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions for the next five years for each of the main territories or regions in which you operate or provide a qualitative explanation for expected changes that could impact future GHG emis | | HP expects to meet its goal to reduce the GHG emissions from owned and leased facilities by 20 percent under 2005 levels by 2013 on an absolute basis. As stated, HP is revising our operations goal due to the large-scale acquisition of EDS in 2008 and the | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 23.14. Please estimate your company’s future energy use for the next five years for each of the main territories or regions in which you operate or provide a qualitative explanation for expected changes that could impact future GHG emissions. | | As mentioned above, HP expects to meet its goal to reduce the GHG emissions from owned and leased facilities by 20 percent under 2005 levels by 2013 on an absolute basis. This will have a corresponding effect on energy use.
Specifically | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 23.15. Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 23.15. Further information | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 23.15. Please explain the methodology used for your estimations and any assumptions made. | | As mentioned, HP is working on refining energy and emissions projections in light of its recent acquisition of EDS. We are evaluating how HP and EDS will merge and looking for opportunities to consolidate and streamline operations to maximize energy redu | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 23.2. If not, please explain why. | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 23.2. If the menu options above are not appropriate, please answer the question using the text box below: | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 23.3. Do you have an emissions and/or energy reduction target(s)? | No. (Please go to question 23.8) | Yes. (Please answer the following questions) | Yes. (Please answer the following questions) |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 23.4 What is the baseline year for the target(s)? | | 2005; Note that the emissions for the baseline year will include EDS operations and activities appropriately. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 23.5. What is the emissions and/or energy reduction target(s)? | | For HP operations:
HP will reduce the GHG emissions from owned and leased facilities by 20 percent under 2005 levels by 2013 on an absolute basis.
• HP is revising our operations goal due to the large scale acquisiti | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 23.6. What are the sources or activities to which the target(s) applies? | | Energy reduction targets apply to HP’s operations and products.
Renewable energy purchase targets apply to HP’s direct consumption of electricity.
As mentioned, HP is finalizing its long-term goals to include EDS and other a | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 23.7. Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 23.7. Further information | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 23.7. Over what period/timescale does the target(s) extend? | | 2010 for pre-existing energy and product goals, 2012 for renewable energy goals and 2013 for the revised operation goals. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 23.8. Attachments | | [link] | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 23.8. Further information | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 23.8. What activities are you undertaking or planning to undertake to reduce your emissions/energy use? | | HP is already taking action to reduce emissions and energy use.
In our operations:
• HP launched two renewable energy programs in 2007: wind power in Ireland, ensuring that nearly 90 percent of HP Ireland’s energy use is rene | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 23.9. Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 23.9. Further information | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 23.9. What benchmarks or key performance indicators do you use to assess progress against the emissions/energy reduction goals you have set? | | As mentioned in the activities section above, HP has identified a number of intermediate goals and benchmarks to achieve our overall reduction goals. As part of our goal to reduce overall emissions by 20 percent by 2013 below our 2005 baseline, HP has als | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 24.1. Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 24.1. Further information | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 24.1. How do you factor the cost of future emissions into capital expenditures and what impact have those estimated costs had on your investment decisions? | | Once HP has established external goals, the cost of meeting them through investments or incremental costs in operating expenses become a part of our planning process. HP practices tight control over its expense management so typically these objectives di | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 3.1. Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 3.1. Description | | The IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, published in 2007, reports that unmitigated climate change could trigger a range of environmental problems that could impact agriculture, natural habitats and many communities in low-lying coastal areas. The Stern Review | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 3.1. Further Information | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 3.1. Other Risks | | We consider our company to be exposed to other risks. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 4.1. Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 4.1. Description | | We believe climate change presents significant opportunities for HP. Rising energy prices, growing concerns about energy security and stricter regulations on consumption are heightening demand for energy-efficient and low-carbon products and services. _x0 | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 4.1. Further Information | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 4.1. Regulatory opportunities | | Regulatory requirements present opportunities for my company. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 5.1. Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 5.1. Description | | We do not believe that we have significant direct business opportunities associated with the physical changes that may occur as a result of climate change. Our opportunities lie with providing products and services that help conserve energy and thus reduc | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 5.1. Further Information | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 5.1. Physical opportunities | | Physical changes do not present opportunities for my company. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 6.1. Attachments | | [link] Contract [link]
[link] | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 6.1. Description | | HP believes there are considerable business opportunities for the entire IT industry resulting from climate change. Specifically, the IT industry can help reduce the need to use energy–by providing communication services that reduce the need to transport | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 6.1. Further Information | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 6.1. Other opportunities | | Climate change presents other opportunities for my company. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 7.1. Date selected is | | Selected date is financial account year end | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 7.1. More information | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 7.1. Please state the end date of the year for which you are reporting GHG emissions. | | 31/10/2008 | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 7.1. Please state the start date of the year for which you are reporting GHG emissions. | | 01/11/2007 | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 8.1. More information | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 8.1. Please indicate the category that describes the company, entities, or group for which Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions are reported. | | Companies over which financial control is exercised – per consolidated audited Financial Statements. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 8.2. Please state whether any parts of your business or sources of GHG emissions are excluded from your reporting boundary. | | Joint ventures are not included within HP’s reporting boundary. Fully-owned subsidiaries, however, are included.
Note that, for the most part, the data published in HP’s Global Citizenship Report on HP’s website does not reflect sites gain | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 9.1. Please describe the process used by your company to calculate Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions including the name of the standard, protocol or methodology you have used to collect activity data and calculate Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions. | | For HP alone, i.e., excluding EDS (EDS’s methodology is included SEPARATELY below):
In 2008, HP collected data from 111 of our largest sites (including all manufacturing sites and our largest office, warehouse, data center and distribution | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 9.1. Select methodologies used to calculate Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions. | | Greenhouse Gas Protocol, Climate Registry | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 9.2 Details of any assumptions made. | | We assume that the data we collect is accurate, that the extrapolations we made are reasonable and that there are no additional emissions sources other than those mentioned and reported in this questionnaire.
Specifically, our calculations | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 9.3 Select calculation tools: | | GHG Protocol - CO2 emissions from business travel 1.2 August 2005,GHG Protocol - CO2 emissions from fuel use in facilities 3.0 March 2008 Version 3.0 December 2007
GHG Protocol - Mobile Combustion CO2 Emissions Calculation Tool. June 2003. Versio | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 9.3 The names of and links to any calculation tools used. | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 9.4 The global warming potentials you have applied and their origin. | | IPCC | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 9.5 Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 9.5 Further Information | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 9.5 The emission factors you have applied and their origin. | | Greenhouse Gas Protocol, E-grid | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | ISIN | | US4282361033 | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | Reporting Historical Data | | No | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | Response State | No response | Answered questionnaire online | Answered questionnaire |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | Scope 1 forecasted emissions in Table 15 below are in the following units. | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | Scope 2 forecasted emissions in Table 15 below are in the following units. | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | SEDOL | | 2424006 | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 10.1 Please tick the box if your total gross global Scope 1 figure (Q10.1) includes emissions that you have transferred outside your reporting boundary (as given in answer to 8.1). Please report these transfers under 13.5. | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 10.1 Total Scope 1 CO2-e | | 303844 | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 10.5 CH4 | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 10.5 CO2 | | 292251 | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 10.5 HFCs | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 10.5 N2O | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 10.5 PFCs | | 9892 | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 10.5 SF6 | | 1701 | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 10.6 Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 10.6 Further Information | | Total emissions of SF6 were 0.07 tonnes. They appear in the table as 0 because no decimal points were accepted for entering the data.
The reporting period for emissions of perfluorinated chemicals (PFCs), included in the Scope 1 totals i | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 10.6. If you have not provided any information about Scope 1 emissions in response to the questions above, please explain your reasons and describe any plans you have for collecting Scope 1 GHG emissions information in future. | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 11.1 Total Scope 2 CO2-e | | 2145534 | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 11.5 Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 11.5 Further Information | | Values reported as "Rest of America," "Rest of Asia Pacific and Japan" and "Rest of Europe, Middle East, and Africa" represent extrapolated emissions data for the region. Country emissions that were less than 0.5 were also included in these regional valu | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 11.5. If you have not provided any information about Scope 2 emissions in response to the questions above, please explain your reasons and describe any plans you have for collecting Scope 2 GHG emissions information in future. | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 12.1. If you consider that the grid average factor used to report Scope 2 emissions in question 11 does not reflect the contractual arrangements you have with electricity suppliers, (for example, because you purchase electricity using a zero or low carbon | | Contractual Scope 2 emissions = 2,094,321 metric tones of CO2e
Out of HP’s total electricity consumption of 2,729 million kWh,* HP purchased approximately 102 million kWh of renewable energy worldwide in 2008. Voluntary renewable energy pur | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 12.2. Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 12.2. Further information | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 12.2. If you retire any certificates (eg: Renewable Energy Certificates) associated with zero or low carbon electricity, please provide details. | | HP retires a number of Renewable Energy Certificates. Specifically we purchased or generated the following renewable energy and/or associated certificates:
In US States
California 3.8 million kWhs
Colorado: 10.4 million kWhs_ | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 13.1 Describe the main sources of emissions for employee business travel | | The main sources of emissions from employee business travel are from travel in commercial airlines. Business travel in commercial airlines is not a central part of HP’s business but in the past has been important to ensure customer satisfaction. HP empl | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 13.1 Emissions in metric tonnes CO2-e. | | The Americas: 42,479
Asia Pacific: 613
EMEA: 18,414
Aggregated estimate for the rest of the world: 265,000
Total: 326,506 | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 13.1 State the methodology, assumptions, calculation tools, databases, emission factors (including sources) and global warming potentials (including sources) you have used for calculating emissions. | | Business travel emissions include recorded commercial air travel for both HP and EDS and car rental estimates for EDS only. The methodology for calculating these emissions was to collect information from travel managers and services on air mileage and on | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 13.2 Emissions in metric tonnes CO2-e. | | Approximately 1,800,000 | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 13.2 State the methodology, assumptions, calculation tools, databases, emission factors (including sources) and global warming potentials (including sources) you have used for calculating emissions. | | We partner with our global logistics service providers (LSP) and have them calculate the CO2 emissions for the freight they are transporting on behalf of HP. Our LSP’s utilize the GHG Protocol or a similar type methodology to calculate the estimated CO2 | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 13.2. External distribution/logistics | | The main sources of emissions are product transportation. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 13.3 Emissions in metric tonnes CO2-e. | | Product use = roughly an order of magnitude greater than HP operations.
Product recycling (CO2e avoided) = approximately 300,000 tonnes of CO2e. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 13.3 State the methodology, assumptions, calculation tools, databases, emission factors (including sources) and global warming potentials (including sources) you have used for calculating emissions. | | Product use was estimated making rough estimates about life-time and use of HP’s products and making broad assumptions about emissions factors for electricity used to power HP products.
The calculations we have are based on total volumes of product | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 13.3 Use/disposal of company’s products and services | | The main sources of emissions are related to product use. A small amount of emissions are avoided through our equipment reuse and recycling programs. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 13.4 Emissions in metric tonnes CO2-e. | | In 2008, the aggregated carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) emissions associated with more than 80 percent of HP’s first-tier manufacturing expenditures totaled approximately 3.5 million metric tonnes. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 13.4 State the methodology, assumptions, calculation tools, databases, emission factors (including sources) and global warming potentials (including sources) you have used for calculating emissions. | | Aggregated CO2e emissions represent the sum of HP-allocated suppliers’ emissions and are calculated by factoring the total supplier emissions by the percentage of HP dollar volume to the suppliers’ total revenue.
HP is asking our suppliers | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 13.4. Company supply chain - Describe the main sources of emissions. | | The primary sources of emissions in HP’s supply chain are suppliers providing materials, manufacturing and assembly for HP’s products globally. This includes contract manufacturers, electronic manufacturing services providers, original design manufacture | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 13.5 Non-transfers - Describe the main sources of emissions | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 13.5 Non-transfers - Report emissions in metric tonnes of CO2-e. | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 13.5 Other | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 13.5 Transfers - Report emissions in metric tonnes of CO2-e. | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 13.5 Transfers -State the methodology, assumptions, calculation tools, databases, emission factors (including sources) and global warming potentials (including sources) you have used for calculating emissions. | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 13.6 Attachments | | [link] | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 13.6 Further information | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 13.6 If you have not provided information about one or more of the categories of Scope 3 GHG emissions in response to the questions above, please explain your reasons and describe any plans you have for collecting Scope 3 indirect emissions information in | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 14.1 Attachments | | [link] Environmental [link] | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 14.1 Further information | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 14.1. If your goods and/or services enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party, please provide details including the estimated avoided emissions, the anticipated timescale over which the emissions are avoided and the methodology, assumptions, emi | | HP is addressing environmental challenges with smart, practical solutions that help our customers conserve resources and minimize impact while saving money and increasing productivity. Below are several examples of how we embed sustainability in our broad | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 15.1. Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 15.1. Further information | | No emissions from biologically sequestered carbon are tracked. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 15.1. Please provide the total global carbon dioxide emissions in metric tonnes CO2 from biologically sequestered carbon. | | 0 | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 16.1. Please supply a financial emissions intensity measurement for the reporting year for your combined Scope 1 and 2 emissions. | | The intensity measurement is total Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions divided by total revenue in billion US dollars. As already noted, emissions reported here are for the combined emissions of all of HP and all of EDS emissions from the 1st of November, 2007 | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 16.1.1. Give the units. For example, the units could be metric tonnes of CO2-e per million Yen of turnover, metric tonnes of CO2-e per US$ of profit, metric tonnes of CO2-e per thousand Euros of turnover. | | Metric tonnes of CO2e/ billion US Dollars of revenue | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 16.1.2. The resulting figure. | | 18119 | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 16.2. Please supply an activity related intensity measurement for the reporting year for your combined Scope 1 and 2 emissions. | | The intensity measurement is total Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions divided by total square footage of facilities in operation. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 16.2.1. Give the units e.g. metric tonnes of CO2-e per metric tonne of output or for service sector businesses per unit of service provided. | | Metric tonnes of CO2e/ million square feet of operations | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 16.2.2. Activity related intensity measurement - Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 16.2.2. Activity related intensity measurement - Further information | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 16.2.2. The resulting figure. | | 27444 | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 17.1. Comments | | HP’s emissions have increased significantly due to the acquisition of EDS. EDS sites represent about 2.4 million square feet or about half of HP’s pre-existing floor-space. As a data service company, EDS has high electricity usage at its facilities whic | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 17.1. Do emissions for the reporting year vary significantly compared to previous years? | No - Please go to question 18. | Yes | Yes |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 17.1.1 Further information | | This number represents the approximate difference between the sum of HP's Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions as reported to the CDP in FY07 compared to FY08 as a percentage of the sum of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions in FY07. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 17.1.1. Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 17.1.1. Have the emissions increased or decreased? | increased | Increased | decreased |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 17.1.1. If the answer to 17.1 is Yes, estimate the percentage by which emissions vary compared with the previous reporting. | | 60 | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 18.1. Has any of the information reported in response to questions 10 – 15 been externally verified/assured in whole or in part? | No information has been provided in response to questions 10-15. Please go to question 19. | None of the information provided in response to question 10-15 has been externally verified/assured in whole or in part. Please go to question 18.6. | Yes, it has been externally verified/assured in whole or in part.(Please continue with questions 18.2 to 18.5) |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 18.2. Please use the text box below to describe the scope/boundary of emissions included within the verification/assurance exercise if the tick box menu options above are not applicable. | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 18.2. State the scope/boundary of emissions included within the verification/assurance exercise. | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 18.3. State what level of assurance (eg: reasonable or limited) has been given. | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 18.4. Provide a copy of the verification/assurance statement. | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 18.5. Specify the standard against which the information has been verified/assured. | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 18.6. Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 18.6. Further information | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 18.6. If none of the information provided in response to questions 10-15 has been verified in whole or in part, please state whether you have plans for GHG emissions accounting information to be externally verified/assured in future. | | HP plans to have our 2008 numbers verified in FY 2009. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 19.1. Do you gather emissions data? | | Emission data is gathered. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 19.1. What are the main sources of uncertainty in your data gathering, handling and calculations e.g.: data gaps, assumptions, extrapolation, metering/measurement inaccuracies etc? | | In order to estimate total emissions, HP had to extrapolate and estimate emissions where data was not available.
For a company with minimal manufacturing like HP, Scope 1 emissions are relatively low. One data gap in Scope 1 emissions i | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 19.2. How do the main sources of uncertainty in your data gathering, handling and calculations affect the accuracy of the reported data in percentage terms or an estimated standard deviation? | | As mentioned in the previous response, HP’s core activities are fairly accurate. Specifically Scope 1 and 2 emissions include either direct data or extrapolations for almost all of the major emissions. For this reason, the information available to us at | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 19.3. Does your company report GHG emissions under any mandatory or voluntary scheme (other than CDP) that requires an accuracy assessment? | No (Please go to question 20.) | No (Please go to question 20.) | Yes (Please answer the following questions - 19.3.1, 19.3.2). |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 19.3.1 Please provide the name of the scheme. | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 19.3.1. More information | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 19.3.2. Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 19.3.2. Further information | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 19.3.2. Please provide the accuracy assessment for GHG emissions reported under that scheme for the last report delivered. | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 2.1. Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 2.1. Description | | As discussed in HP’s 10k, our business could be impacted by natural disasters including those attributed to climate change. For example, power shortages and blackouts could interrupt our operations or those of our suppliers, distributors and customers. An | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 1.1. Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 1.1. Description | | Expansion of regulatory schemes designed to combat climate change could be both a risk and an opportunity for HP.
From an operations perspective, any regulation that puts an upward pressure on the cost of energy may potentially increase o | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 1.1. Further Information | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data | 1.1. Regulatory Risks | | We consider our company to be exposed to regulatory risks. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 0. Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 0. Further Information | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 0.1. Introduction - Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. | | We are guided by shared values and seven companywide objectives, which include a longstanding commitment to global citizenship. Larger than any organization or program, global citizenship at HP encompasses all the ways we go about aligning our business go | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 0.3. Are you participating in the Walmart Sustainability Assessment? | No | Yes | Yes |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 0.4. Modules - As part of the Investor CDP information request, electric utilities, companies with electric utility activities or assets, companies in the automobile or auto component manufacture sectors and companies in the oil and gas industry should co | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 1. Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 1. Further Information | | It is vital that HP’s employees understand and support our global citizenship programs. Goals and objectives are set annually as part of HP's performance management and review process. Individuals with responsibility for achieving the goals are held acco | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 1.1. Where is the highest level of responsibility for climate change within your company? | There is no individual or committee with overall responsibility for climate change | Board committee or other executive body | Board committee or other executive body |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 1.1a . Please specify who is responsible. | | Board/Executive Board | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 1.1b. Select the lower level department responsible. | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 1.2. What is the mechanism by which the board committee or other executive body reviews the company’s progress and status regarding climate change? | | HP’s governance and responsibility for actions related to climate change are the same as those established to manage all aspects of global citizenship.
HP’s Executive Council (EC) has overall responsibility for global citizenship as part of our business | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 1.3a. Please explain how overall responsibility for climate change is managed within your company. | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 1.3b. Please explain how overall responsibility for climate change is managed within your company. | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 1.4. Do you provide incentives for the management of climate change issues, including the attainment of greenhouse gas (GHG) targets? | | Yes | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 14. Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 14. Further Information | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 14.1. Do you consider that the grid average factors used to report Scope 2 emissions in question 13 reflect the contractual arrangements you have with electricity suppliers? | | No | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 14.2. You may report a total contractual Scope 2 figure in response to this question. Please provide your total global contractual Scope 2 GHG emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2-e. | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 14.3. Explain the origin of the alternative figure including information about the emission factors used and the tariffs. | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 14.4. Has your organization retired any certificates, e.g. Renewable Energy Certificates, associated with zero or low carbon electricity within the reporting year or has this been done on your behalf? | | Yes | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 16. Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 16. Further Information | | • [link]
• [link] | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 16.1. Does the use of your goods and/or services enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party? | | Yes | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 16.2. Please provide details including the anticipated timescale over which the emissions are avoided, in which sector of the economy they might help to avoid emissions and their potential to avoid emissions. | | HP recognizes the important role that the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) sector will play in enabling carbon dioxide (CO2) reductions across a variety of sectors. We are committed to reducing our own contribution to climate change as well | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 17.1. Please provide your total carbon dioxide emissions in metric tonnes CO2 from the combustion of biologically sequestered carbon i.e. carbon dioxide emissions from burning biomass/biofuels. | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 17.2. Please explain why not. | | No emissions from biologically sequestered carbon are tracked. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 19. Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 19. Further Information | | Annual third party verification for FY09 is done in Q410. Verification is performed for Scope 1 and 2 emissions from operations by Bureau Veritas. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 19.1. Do the absolute emissions (Scope 1 and Scope 2 combined) for the reporting year vary significantly compared to the previous year? | | Yes | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 19.2. Please explain why they have varied and why the variation is significant. | | HP’s absolute emissions from operations dropped by 10% compared to the previous year. This is due to significant real estate consolidation, investments in energy efficiency, and increase purchases of low/no carbon electricity. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 2. Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 2. Further Information | | [link]
Changing the Equation - [link] | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 2.1. Describe your company’s process for identifying significant risks and/or opportunities from climate change and assessing the degree to which they could affect your business, including the financial implications. | | HP includes climate change as a factor in both risk and business opportunity discussions. HP reviews a broad spectrum of risks annually as part of our preparing our corporate securities disclosures and our internal enterprise risk management process. In | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 20.1A Index | | 1410 | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 20.1A. Please complete the following table indicating the percentage of reported emissions that have been verified/assured and attach the relevant statement.
20.1C1. Scope 1 (Q12.1) | | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 20.1B. I have attached an external verification statement that covers the following scopes: | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 20.1C2. Scope 2 (Q13.1) | | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 20.1C3. Scope 3 (Q15.1) | | | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 21. Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 21. Further Information | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 21.1. Do you participate in any emission trading schemes? | No, we don't participate nor do we currently anticipate participating in any emissions trading scheme within the next two years. | No, we don't participate nor do we currently anticipate participating in any emissions trading scheme within the next two years. | Yes |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 21.3. What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 21.4. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? | No | No | Yes |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 22. Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 22. Further Information | | HP reports annually on Corporate Social Responsibility through its Global Citizenship Report and responds to the Supply Chain Module of the CDP. A link to HP's 2009 Global Citizenship Report has been attached.
HP published a white paper on Low Carbon IT | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 22.1. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change/GHG emissions in other places than in your CDP response? | | Yes | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 22.2. In your Annual Reports or other mainstream filing? (If so, please attach your latest publication(s).) | | Yes | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 22.3. Through voluntary communications such as CSR reports? (If so, please attach your latest publication(s).) | | Yes | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 3. Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 3. Further Information | | [link]
[link] | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 3.1. Do current and/or anticipated regulatory requirements related to climate change present significant risks to your company? | | Yes | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 3.2B. What are the current and/or anticipated significant regulatory risks related to climate change and their associated countries/regions and timescales? | | Companies, governments and people worldwide must work together to address the challenges climate change poses. Energy efficiency and climate change took priority during 2009, due to the global focus on the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Cope | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 3.3. Describe the ways in which the identified risks affect or could affect your business and your value chain. | | Energy, emissions, water or product material regulations could increase cost of doing business, though it is not likely to affect HP disproportionately compared to other businesses in our sector.
From a supply chain costs perspective, HP has included t | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 3.4. Are there financial implications associated with the identified risks? | | Yes | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 3.5. Please describe them. | | From an operations perspective, any regulation that puts an upward pressure on the cost of energy would potentially increase our cost of doing business in that region (although likely not disproportionately compared with other businesses in our sector). | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 3.6. Describe any actions the company has taken or plans to take to manage or adapt to the risks that have been identified, including the cost of those actions. | | HP is responding by aligning our global citizenship efforts with our business goals, focusing where we believe we can apply our technologies, resources and expertise to make the greatest impact.
HP is also supporting the development and promotion of clim | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 3.7. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to significant regulatory risks - current and/or anticipated. | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 3.8. Please explain why not. | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 4. Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 4. Further Information | | [link]
Climate Change: Global issue brief [link]
[link] | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 4.1. Do current and/or anticipated physical impacts of climate change present significant risks to your company? | | Yes | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 4.2B. What are the current and/or anticipated significant physical risks, and their associated countries/regions and timescales? | | Our planet’s climate is changing, and greenhouse gases (GHG) are the main culprit. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report published in 2007 shows that unmitigated climate change would likely trigger a range of enviro | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 4.3. Describe the ways in which the identified risks affect or could affect your business and your value chain. | | Power shortages and blackouts could interrupt our operations or those of our suppliers, distributors and customers. And while HP’s operations are not generally located in low-lying areas subject to severe impacts from sea level rise, any disruption to key | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 4.4. Are there financial implications associated with the identified risks? | | Yes | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 4.5. Please describe them. | | These types of short-term and long-term disruptions to locations where we or our suppliers are currently located or ship could have financial implications. Short-term disruptions can cause revenue delays or increase manufacturing or shipping costs. Longe | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 4.6. Describe any actions the company has taken or plans to take to manage or adapt to the risks that have been identified, including the cost of those actions. | | HP is committed to reducing its climate impact by continually making its global operations more energy efficient and seeking low-carbon energy sources where possible and thereby reducing some of the physical risk that climate change poses to our facilitie | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 4.7. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to significant physical risks - current and/or anticipated. | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 4.8. Please explain why not. | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 5. Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 5. Further Information | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 5.1. Does climate change present other significant risks - current and/or anticipated - for your company? | | Yes | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 5.2B. What are the current and/or anticipated other significant risks, and their associated countries/regions and timescales? | | HP realizes the importance, and associated reputational risk to the company, of perceptions and expectations of stakeholders with regards to global citizenship and climate change. HP’s stakeholders include our customers, nongovernmental organizations, ou | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 5.3. Describe the ways in which the identified risks affect or could affect your business and your value chain. | | Any of these environmental, economic and social impacts could have a negative impact on our company, as they would on any other business concern. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 5.4. Are there financial implications associated with the identified risks? | | Yes | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 5.5. Please describe them. | | We have no way to project them at this stage in a way that would be meaningful under accounting principles. To first order, the impact on HP is likely to be commensurate with the impact on global gross domestic product. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 5.6. Describe any actions the company has taken or plans to take to manage or adapt to the other risks that have been identified, including the costs of those actions. | | Our exposure would be very similar to other companies in the ICT sector. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 5.7. Explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to other significant risks - current and/or anticipated. | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 5.8. Please explain why not. | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 6. Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 6. Further Information | | [link] | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 6.1. Do current and/or anticipated regulatory requirements related to climate change present significant opportunities for your company? | | Yes | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 6.2B. What are the current and/or anticipated significant regulatory opportunities and their associated countries/regions and timescales? | | Governments across the globe are working with the private sector to reduce the emission of greenhouse gasses which are a primary cause of climate change, through improving the energy efficiency of economies, avoiding deforestation, and switching to less c | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 6.3. Describe the ways in which the identified opportunities affect or could affect your business and your value chain. | | Rising energy prices, growing concerns about energy security and stricter regulations on consumption are heightening demand for energy-efficient and low-carbon products and services. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 6.4. Are there financial implications associated with the identified opportunities? | | No | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 6.5. Please describe them. | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 6.6. Describe any actions the company has taken or plans to take to exploit the opportunities that have been identified, including the investment needed to take those actions. | | HP advocates the transformation to a low-carbon economy and signed the Copenhagen Communiqué on climate change. We promote the role that IT can play in reducing energy use and in a low-carbon [link] transforming existing processes into sustainable on | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 6.7. Explain why you do not consider your company to be presented with significant opportunities - current and/or anticipated. | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 6.8. Please explain why not. | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 7. Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 7. Further Information | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 7.1. Do current and/or anticipated physical impacts of climate change present significant opportunities for your company? | | No | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 7.2B. What are the current and/or anticipated significant physical opportunities and their associated countries/regions and timescales? | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 7.3. Describe the ways in which the identified opportunities affect or could affect your business and your value chain. | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 7.4. Are there financial implications associated with the identified opportunities? | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 7.5. Please describe them. | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 7.6. Describe any actions the company has taken or plans to take to exploit the opportunities that have been identified, including the investment needed to take those actions. | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 7.7. Explain why you do not consider your company to be presented with significant opportunities - current and/or anticipated. | | We do not believe that we have business opportunities associated with the physical changes that may occur as a result of climate change. Our opportunities lie with providing products and services that help conserve energy and thus reduce future greenhouse | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 7.8. Please explain why not. | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 8. Attachments | | [link] [Attachment] [link] | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 8. Further Information | | [link]
Change – Global issue Brief [link]
[link] | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 8.1. Does climate change present other significant opportunities - current and/or anticipated - for your company? | | Yes | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 8.2B. What are the current and/or anticipated other significant opportunities and their associated countries/regions and timescales? | | HP recognizes that the costs of adapting to unmitigated climate change will likely far outweigh the costs of slowing it down. Our climate strategy involves harnessing the power of IT to drive greater efficiency across the global economy. The opportunity | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 8.3. Describe the ways in which the identified opportunities affect or could affect your business and your value chain. | | HP recognizes that the costs of adapting to unmitigated climate change will likely far outweigh the costs of slowing it down. HP is therefore investing in transparent, efficient and transformational technologies and applying these solutions throughout ou | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 8.4. Are there financial implications associated with the identified opportunities? | | Yes | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 8.5. Please describe them. | | HP is responding by aligning our global citizenship efforts with our business goals, focusing where we believe we can apply our technologies, resources and expertise to make the greatest impact. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 8.6. Describe any actions the company has taken or plans to take to exploit the opportunities that have been identified, including the investment needed to take those actions. | | Please see attachment | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 8.7. Explain why you do not consider your company to be presented with significant opportunities - current and/or anticipated. | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 8.8. Please explain why not. | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 9. Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 9. Further Information | | [link] | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 9.1. Please describe how your overall group business strategy links with actions taken on risks and opportunities (identified in questions 3 to 8), including any emissions reduction targets or achievements, public policy engagement and external communicat | | Global citizenship is one of HP’s seven corporate objectives, a commitment spanning our entire organization and rooted in values that have guided the company since it was founded. For over 70 years, this commitment has driven us to meet higher standards o | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 9.10. Do you engage with policy makers on possible responses to climate change including taxation, regulation and carbon trading? | | Yes | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 9.11. Please describe. | | Companies, governments and people worldwide must work together to address the challenges climate change poses. Energy efficiency and climate change took priority during 2009, due to the global focus on the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copen | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 9.2. Do you have a current emissions reduction target? | | Yes | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 9.3. Please explain why not and forecast how your Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions will change over the next 5 years. (If you do not have a target) | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 9.4. Please give details of the target(s) you are developing and when you expect to announce it/them. (If you are in the process of developing a target) | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 9.5. Please explain if you intend to set a new target. (If you have had a target and the date for completing it fell within your reporting year, please answer questions 9.5 and 9.6) | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 9.9. Please provide any other information you consider necessary to describe your emission reduction activities. | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 9.a Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 9.a Further Information | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 9.b Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | 9.b Further Information | | • The Climate Group - [link]
• Combat Climate Change - [link]
• The International Climate Change Partnership - [link]
• Pew Center on Global Climat | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | Comms Index | | 1434 | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | Emissions 14 Index | | 1427 | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | Emissions 16 Index | | 1427 | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | Emissions 18 Index | | 1427 | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | Emissions 21 Index | | 1427 | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | Governance Index | | 1434 | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | Risks&Opps 2 Index | | 1434 | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | Risks&Opps 3 Index | | 1434 | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | Risks&Opps 4 Index | | 1434 | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | Risks&Opps 5 Index | | 1434 | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | Risks&Opps 6 Index | | 1434 | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | Risks&Opps 7 Index | | 1434 | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | Risks&Opps 8 Index | | 1434 | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | Strategy 9 (2) Index | | 1434 | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | Strategy 9 (3) Index | | 1434 | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data | Strategy 9 Index | | 1434 | |
| Carbon Disclosure Project--all respondents | Response to CDP questionnaire | no response | answered | answered |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 0. Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 0. Further Information | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 0.1. Introduction
Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. | | HP’s commitment to global citizenship is shaped by issues—such as meeting energy needs of a fast-growing global population, responding to climate change, managing the information explosion and transforming education—that cut across industries, economies a | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 0.2 Index | | 123 | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 0.2. Reporting Year
Please state the start and end date of the year for which you are reporting data.
2.0. Enter the period that will be disclosed. | | Sat 01 Nov 2008 - Sat 31 Oct 2009 | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 0.3a. Reporting Boundary
Please indicate the category that describes the company, entities, or group for which you are reporting. | | Companies over which financial control is exercised per consolidated audited financial statements | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 0.3b. Exclusions
Are there any geographies, activities, facilities or types of water inputs/outputs within this boundary which are not included in your disclosure? | No | No | Yes |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 1. Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 1. Further Information | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 1.1. Does your company have a water policy, strategy or management plan? | No | Yes | Yes |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 1.2. Please describe your policy, strategy or plan here: | | In 2009, we launched the Global Workplace Initiative to reduce the space we occupy, use resources more efficiently, decrease our climate impact and water consumption, and cut costs. The initiative has had the additional benefit of freeing up office buildi | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 1.3. Where is the highest level of responsibility within your company for the policy, strategy or plan? | | Board committee or other executive body | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 1.3a. Please specify who is responsible. | | Other: HP’s executive council | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 1.3b. Please specify who is responsible. | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 1.7. What water-related actions are you considering taking? | | After completion of the EICC industry water risk assessment in China, HP will consider actions to encourage best practices in water management with our largest suppliers. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 1.9. You may explain here why your company does not have a water policy, strategy or management plan and if you intend to put one in place. | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 10. Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 10. Further Information | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 10.1. Please describe any detrimental impacts to business related to water your company has faced in the past five years, their financial impacts and whether they have resulted in any changes to company practices. | | HP Operations have not faced detrimental impacts to business related to water. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 11. Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 11. Further Information | | HP’s operations are not water intensive. Although HP’s operations are not water intensive, we recognize that water consumption is a growing concern globally. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 11.1. Do water-related issues present significant opportunities for your company? | No | Yes | Yes |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 11.2. In what way(s) do water-related issues present significant opportunities for your company? | | HP realizes that water use is a growing concern for our worldwide stakeholders, and though HP operations are not water intensive and HP has goals to reduce our water consumption, the opportunity for HP lies in using our technological strengths to help our | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 11.3. Are there financial implications associated with the identified opportunities? | Don't know | Yes | Yes |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 11.4. Please describe them. | | Global citizenship is integral to the success of HP's business and we are focusing on where we believe we can apply our technologies, resources and expertise to make the greatest impact. HP recognizes that water consumption is a growing concern globally. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 11.5. Please describe any actions your company has taken or plans to take to exploit the opportunities identified, including the investment needed to take those actions. | In case of short of rain Iberdrola also invests, in new plants with the capacity to meet demand peaks: pumped storage hydroelectric plants 1000 MW (La Muela, San Esteban and San Pedro). The Company presented its plans for hydroelectricity development in t | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 11.6. Please explain why you do not consider water-related issues to present opportunities for your company. | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 11.7. You may explain here why you do not know whether water-related issues present significant opportunities for your company or whether you intend to assess potential opportunities in the future. | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 12. Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 12. Further Information | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 12.1. Has your company identified any linkages between its use of water and energy, or considered any trade-offs between the two when taking action to manage water or carbon related risks or to exploit water or carbon related opportunities? | No | Yes | Yes |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 12.2. Please describe them. | | HP recognizes that many conservation efforts result in positive impacts to both our energy consumption and water consumption. Space utilization, heating and cooling systems are examples. In 2009, we launched the Global Workplace Initiative to reduce the | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 13. Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 13. Further Information | | HP’s operations are not water intensive, and nearly all of HP’s water consumption comes from municipal supplies. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 13.1. Are you able to provide data for the total water withdrawn in your own operations? | No | Yes | Yes |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 13.2a Index | | 123 | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 13.2a. Please provide figures for total water withdrawal by source type (in cubic meters per year).
13.2aC1. Area/business unit | | Company total | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 13.2aC2. Surface water (m3/yr) | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 13.2aC3. Ground water (m3/yr) | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 13.2aC4. Rainwater (m3/yr) | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 13.2aC5. Waste water (m3/yr) | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 13.2aC6. Municipal water (m3/yr) | | 7647000 | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 13.2aC7. Total (m3/yr) | | 7647000 | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 13.2c. Please add any comments here or use this space to report water withdrawals in a different format to that set out above: | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 13.3. You may explain here why you are not able to report the total water withdrawn in your own operations and whether you have any plans to put in place systems that would enable you to do so. | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 13.4. Are any water sources significantly affected by your withdrawal of water? | Don't know | No | Yes |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 13.4a. Please add any comments on your company's ability to identify significantly affected water sources here: | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 14. Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 14. Further Information | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 14.1. Do you know the total volume of water recycled and reused in your own operations? | No | No | Yes |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 14.2a Index | 10 | 123 | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 14.2a. Please report the total volume of water recycled and reused in your own operations (in cubic meters per year and as a percentage of the total water withdrawal reported in question 13.2a).
14.2aC1. Area/business unit | | Company total | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 14.2aC2. Volume recycled (m3/yr) | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 14.2aC3. Volume reused (m3/yr) | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 14.2aC4. Total volume recycled/reused (m3/yr) | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 14.2aC5. Total volume recycled/reused as a percentage of withdrawals (%) | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 14.2aC6. Please add any comments here: | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 14.3. You may explain here why you are not able to report the total volumes of water recycled or reused in your own operations and whether you have any plans to put in place systems that would enable you to do so. | | While HP does recycle/reuse water, the volumes are not reported on a company-wide basis. Our current company-wide goal is tied to reduction of water consumption, so while reuse/recycling contributes to this goal, reuse/recycling is not currently a goal o | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 15. Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 15. Further Information | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 15.1. Are you able to identify your planned and unplanned discharges of water from your own operations by destination, by treatment method and by quality in terms of effluent using standard effluent parameters? | No | No | Yes |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 15.2. You may explain here why you are not able to identify discharges from your own operations by destination, treatment method and quality, and whether you have any plans to put in place systems that would enable you to do so. | | While we cannot segregate our discharges, we do know what they are. Further, uncontrolled or accidental discharges that are alleged violations are reported and tracked to closure at the Company level.
HP’s operations are not water intensive. However, w | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 15.3. Has your company paid any significant penalties or fines in respect of breaches of regulations relating to discharges from your own operations during the reporting period? | No | No | Yes |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 15.4. You may provide details here including any actions taken to minimise the risk of future non-compliance. | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 15.5. Are any habitats significantly affected by discharges of water and runoff from your operations? | No | No | Yes |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 15.5a. Please add any comments on your company's ability to identify affected habitats here: | | All wastewater discharges are managed to local regulations and discharge to municipal sewage treatment. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 16. Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 16. Further Information | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 2. Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 2. Further Information | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 2.1. Are you able to identify which of your operations are located in water-stressed regions? | No | No | Yes |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 2.4. You may explain here why you are not able to identify which of your operations are located in water-stressed regions and whether you have any plans to explore this issue in the future. | | HP actively manages all of its real estate at both the local and global level, and has a general awareness of water stressed regions at the global level, and operations within those regions. These factors are taken into account when developing new sites | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 3. Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 3. Further Information | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 3.1. Is your company exposed to significant physical risks related to water in its own operations? | Don't know | No | Yes |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 3.3. Please describe the ways in which the identified risks affect or could affect your own operations. | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 3.4. Are there financial implications to the identified risks? | Don't know | Not avail. | Yes |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 3.5. Please describe them. | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 3.6. Please describe any actions the company has taken or plans to take to manage or adapt to the risks that have been identified, including their impact on operating costs (positive or negative) and CAPEX programs. | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 3.7. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to physical risks. | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 3.8. You may explain here why you do not know if your company is exposed to physical risks and whether you have any plans to assess these risks in the future. | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 4. Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 4. Further Information | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 4.1. Is your company exposed to significant regulatory risks related to water in its own operations? | No | No | Yes |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 4.3. Please describe the ways in which the identified risks affect or could affect your own operations. | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 4.4. Are there financial implications to the identified risks? | | Not avail. | Yes |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 4.5. Please describe them. | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 4.6. Please describe any actions the company has taken or plans to take to manage or adapt to the risks that have been identified, including their impact on operating costs (positive or negative) and CAPEX programs. | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 4.7. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to regulatory risks. | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 4.8. You may explain here why you do not know if your company is exposed to regulatory risks and whether you have any plans to assess these risks in the future. | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 5. Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 5. Further Information | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 5.1. Is your company exposed to other significant risks (such as product or reputational risks) related to water in its own operations? | Don't know | No | Yes |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 5.3. Please describe the ways in which the identified risks affect or could affect your own operations. | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 5.4. Are there financial implications to the identified risks? | No | Not avail. | Yes |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 5.5. Please describe them. | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 5.6. Please describe any actions the company has taken or plans to take to manage or adapt to the risks that have been identified, including their impact on operating costs (positive or negative) and CAPEX programs. | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 5.7. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to other risks. | | Although HP’s operations are not water intensive, we recognize that water consumption is a growing concern globally.
In 2009, we used 7,647 million liters of water worldwide, predominantly for domestic use in buildings, cooling and landscape irrigation. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 5.8. You may explain here why you do not know if your company is exposed to other risks and whether you have any plans to assess these risks in the future. | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 6. Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 6. Further Information | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 6.1. Are you able to identify which of your key water-intensive inputs come from water-stressed regions? | No | No | Yes |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 6.4. Do you require your key suppliers to report on their water use, risks and management? | No | Yes | Yes |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 6.4a. Please add any comments regarding supplier water reporting here: | | HP requested from more than 90% of our Tier 1 manufacturing, material and component suppliers to report their water consumption and water reduction goal. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 7. Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 7. Further Information | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 7.1. Is your supply chain exposed to significant physical risks related to water? | Don't know | No | Yes |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 7.3. Please describe the ways in which the identified risks affect or could affect the companies in your supply chain. | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 7.4. Are there financial implications to the identified risks? | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 7.5. Please describe them. | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 7.6. Please describe any actions the company has taken or plans to take to manage or adapt to the risks that have been identified, including their impact on operating costs (positive or negative) and CAPEX programs. | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 7.7. Please explain why you do not consider your supply chain to be exposed to physical risks. | | The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report published in 2007 shows that unmitigated climate change would likely trigger a range of environmental problems that would impact agriculture, natural habitats and many communities in l | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 7.8. You may explain here why you do not know if your supply chain is exposed to physical risks and whether you have any plans to assess these risks in the future. | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 8. Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 8. Further Information | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 8.1. Are the companies in your supply chain exposed to significant regulatory risks related to water? | Don't know | No | Yes |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 8.3. Please describe the ways in which the identified risks affect or could affect the companies in your supply chain. | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 8.4. Are there financial implications to the identified risks? | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 8.5. Please describe them. | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 8.6. Please describe any actions the company has taken or plans to take to manage or adapt to the risks that have been identified, including their impact on operating costs (positive or negative) and CAPEX programs. | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 8.7. Please explain why you do not consider your supply chain to be exposed to regulatory risks. | | We do not believe that our supply chain is exposed to significant regulatory risks - through contractual agreements and EICC audits HP requires wastewater generated from operations, industrial processes and sanitation facilities are to be characterized, m | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 8.8. You may explain here why you do not know if your supply chain is exposed to regulatory risks and whether you have any plans to assess these risks in the future. | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 9. Attachments | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 9. Further Information | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 9.1. Are the companies in your supply chain exposed to other significant risks (such as reputational risks) related to water? | Don't know | No | Yes |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 9.3. Please describe the ways in which the identified risks affect or could affect the companies in your supply chain. | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 9.4. Are there financial implications to the identified risks? | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 9.5. Please describe them. | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 9.6. Please describe any actions the company has taken or plans to take to manage or adapt to the risks that have been identified, including their impact on operating costs (positive or negative) and CAPEX programs. | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 9.7. Please explain why you do not consider your supply chain to be exposed to other risks. | | HP does not consider that these risks would affect HP disproportionately compared to other businesses in our sector. Furthermore, HP has taken the initiative to request more than 90% of our Tier 1 manufacturing, material and component suppliers to report | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | 9.8. You may explain here why you do not know if your supply chain is exposed to other risks and whether you have any plans to assess these risks in the future. | | Not avail. | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | Accounting 13 Index | | 123 | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | Accounting 14 Index | | 123 | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | Accounting 15 Index | | 123 | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | Accounting 16 Index | | 123 | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | Impacts Opps 10 Index | | 123 | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | Impacts Opps 11 Index | | 123 | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | Impacts Opps 12 Index | | 123 | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | Management Index | | 123 | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | Own Operations 2 Index | | 123 | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | Own Operations 3 Index | | 123 | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | Own Operations 4 Index | | 123 | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | Own Operations 5 Index | | 123 | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | Supply Chain 6 Index | | 123 | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | Supply Chain 7 Index | | 123 | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | Supply Chain 8 Index | | 123 | |
| CDP Water Data 2010 | Supply Chain 9 Index | | 123 | |
| Climate Counts | POLICY | -7.0 | 9.0 | 10.0 |
| Climate Counts | REDUCE | 0.0 | 44.0 | 48.0 |
| Climate Counts | REPORT | 0.0 | 11.0 | 11.0 |
| Climate Counts | REVIEW | 0.0 | 21.0 | 22.0 |
| Climate Counts | TOTAL | 0.0 | 34.0 | 82.0 |
| Copenhagen Communique | List of the companies who have helped develop or support the Copenhagen Communique | | Yes | Yes |
| CorporateRegister.com | Corporate Report Count | 0 | 22 | 34 |
| Covalence Ethical Quotient | EthicalQuote Rank | 541 | 3 | 1 |
| Covalence Ethical Quotient | Impact of Product | 541 | 8 | 1 |
| Covalence Ethical Quotient | Impact of Production | 541 | 9 | 1 |
| Covalence Ethical Quotient | Institutional Impact | 541 | 5 | 1 |
| Covalence Ethical Quotient | Working Conditions | 541 | 532 | 1 |
| CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2011 | Climate Change Rank | 352 | 32 | 1 |
| CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2011 | Corporate Governance Rank | 913 | 1 | 1 |
| CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2011 | Employee Relations | 303 | 9 | 1 |
| CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2011 | Environmental Rank | 276 | 5 | 1 |
| CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2011 | Financial Risk | 968 | 464 | 1 |
| CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2011 | Human Rights Rank | 236 | 25 | 1 |
| CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2011 | Philanthropy Rank | 492 | 8 | 1 |
| CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2011 | Rank | 100 | 9 | 1 |
| CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2011 | Weighted
Average
Score | 176.5 | 70.8 | 46.2 |
| Div50 2009 | DiversityBusiness.com Div50 2009 | 50 | 36 | 1 |
| Div50 2010 | DiversityBusiness.com Div50 2010 | 50 | 29 | 1 |
| Electronic Industry Citizenship Coalition | Member of the Electronic Industry Citizenship Coalition | | Yes | Yes |
| EPEAT | EPEAT manufacturer number of certified products | 2 | 139 | 188 |
| Equal Opportunity 2009 | Equal Opportunity top 50 companies 2009 | 50 | 24 | 1 |
| Equal Opportunity 2010 | Equal Opportunity top 50 companies 2010 | 50 | 1 | 1 |
| Ethisphere | Ethisphere most ethical companies | | Yes | Yes |
| Glassdoor | Glassdoor Employer Ratings | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| Global 100 List 2009 | Global 100 member 2009 | | Yes | Yes |
| Global Reporting Initiative 2009 | List of companies who submit their annual CSR reports to GRI | GRI-checked | Self-decl'd | Unknown |
| Global Reporting Initiative 2010 | Application Level | Undeclared | B | A+ |
| Global Reporting Initiative 2010 | Country | | United States of America | |
| Global Reporting Initiative 2010 | Date Added To Sr List | | 13/04/10 | |
| Global Reporting Initiative 2010 | Guidelines | GRI - G3 | GRI - G3 | GRI - G3 |
| Global Reporting Initiative 2010 | Integrated | No | No | Yes |
| Global Reporting Initiative 2010 | OECD | 0 | OECD | OECD |
| Global Reporting Initiative 2010 | Publication Year | | 2010 | |
| Global Reporting Initiative 2010 | Region | | Northern America | |
| Global Reporting Initiative 2010 | Report Html Address | | Not app. | |
| Global Reporting Initiative 2010 | Report Pdf Address | | Not app. | |
| Global Reporting Initiative 2010 | Report Title | | Global Citizenship Report | |
| Global Reporting Initiative 2010 | Sector | | Technology Hardware | |
| Global Reporting Initiative 2010 | Sector Supplements (Final) | Not Used | Not Used | |
| Global Reporting Initiative 2010 | Size | SME | Large | Large |
| Global Reporting Initiative 2010 | Status | 0 | Self-decl'd | Third-party-checked |
| Goodness 500 | Executive Diversity | 3.0% | 20.0% | 39.0% |
| Goodness 500 | Percentage of Profit | 0.0000% | 0.2000% | 9.2000% |
| Hispanic Magazine 100 list | Corporate 100 (Hispanic Magazine) | | Yes | Yes |
| Hispanic Trends | Top 50 Corporations for Supplier Diversity | | Yes | Yes |
| Human Rights Campaign 2009 List | HRC List | | Yes | Yes |
| Human Rights Campaign 2011 List | HRC Rating | 0 | 100 | 100 |
| NAFE Top 50 | Supports and promotes woman employees | | Yes | Yes |
| NASDAQ OMX CRD Global Sustainability Index | NASDAQ OMX CRD Global Sustainability Index | | Yes | Yes |
| Newsweek Top 100 Global Green Companies 2010 | Newsweek Global Environmental Impact | 1.00 | 58.92 | 100.00 |
| Newsweek Top 100 Global Green Companies 2010 | Newsweek Global Green Policies and Performance | 1.00 | 95.56 | 100.00 |
| Newsweek Top 100 Global Green Companies 2010 | Newsweek Global Reputation | 1.00 | 92.87 | 100.00 |
| Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2010 | Newsweek Environmental Impact | 1.00 | 90.60 | 100.00 |
| Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2010 | Newsweek Green Policies and Performance | 1.00 | 94.09 | 100.00 |
| Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2010 | Newsweek Reputation | 1.00 | 95.35 | 100.00 |
| SA 8000 | SA 8000 Certification | | Yes | Yes |
| Tea Party Patriots Boycott List | List of companies deemed unpatriotic by members of the Tea Party Patriots | | Yes | Yes |
| Top 100 Diversity Supplier Programs for Hispanics | Top 100 Diversity Supplier Programs | | Yes | Yes |
| Top 50 Socially Responsible | Top 50 Socially Responsible | | Yes | Yes |
| UN Global Compact 2009 | Diversity & Labor Rights | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| UN Global Compact 2009 | Energy & Climate Change | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| UN Global Compact 2009 | Environment Policy & Reporting | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| UN Global Compact 2009 | Human Rights & Supply Chain | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| UN Global Compact 2009 | Leadership Ethics | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| UN Global Compact 2010 | additional_questions | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| UN Global Compact 2010 | ends_on | | 12/01/2009 | |
| UN Global Compact 2010 | format | annual rep | sustain rep | sustain rep |
| UN Global Compact 2010 | include_continued_support_statement | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| UN Global Compact 2010 | include_measurement | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| UN Global Compact 2010 | references_anti_corruption | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| UN Global Compact 2010 | references_environment | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| UN Global Compact 2010 | references_human_rights | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| UN Global Compact 2010 | references_labour | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| UN Global Compact 2010 | starts_on | | 01/01/2009 | |
| United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime Anti-Corruption Measures | United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime Anti-Corruption Measures | No | Yes | Yes |
| Universum | Universum 100 Diverse Employers | | Yes | Yes |
| Working Mother List 2009 | Working Mother list | | Yes | Yes |
| World Economic Forum Members | Industry Partners | | Yes | Yes |
| World Economic Forum Members | Strategic Partners | | Yes | Yes |
