Walmart Inc. ESG Ratings

58
ESG Rating Compared With All Companies
?
Community
57
Employees
55
Environment
62
Governance
57
Low
0-29
30-39
40-49
50-59
60-79
80-100
High
?
ESG Rating History
This company vs 55,636 companies
The average for the 1315 companies in the Retail industry
?
  • Sustainable Forestry Supporter
  • Trump Involved

2 Special Issues

Affect This Company

?
90
Active Sources
316 Total Sources
?
Share This Summary

From our humble beginnings as a small discount retailer in Rogers, Ark., Walmart has opened thousands of stores in the U.S. and expanded internationally. Through innovation, we're creating a seamless experience to let customers shop anytime and anywhere online and in stores. We are creating opportunities and bringing value to customers and communities around the globe. Walmart operates more than 10,500 stores and numerous eCommerce websites in 19 countries. We employ 2.1 million associates around the world — nearly 1.6 million in the U.S. alone.

Changed name to Walmart Inc. from Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 9/1/2022.

Ticker: WMT
ISIN: US9311421039
Address:

702 SW 8th Street

  Bentonville, AR, 72716-8611, USA
Website: Walmart Inc.
Phone #: 5012734000
CSR Web Area: Walmart Inc. CSR site ?
Industry: Retail, General Merchandise Stores, Wholesale Trade
PRIORITIES
Community
2.6
Employees
2.8
Environment
3.7
Governance
2.9
Edit your profiles
SWITCH PROFILE ?
Data Date
January 01, 2024
0 SPECIAL ISSUES SELECTED
ESG Rating For Walmart Inc.
Click On A Company, Industry, Region, Or Subcategory For More Info
Overall Community Employees Environment Governance
Overall CommunityCommunity Dev & PhilanthropyHuman Rights & Supply ChainProduct
Walmart Inc.
57
58
56
57
Retail
48
50
48
46
General Merchandise Stores
52
53
49
54
Wholesale Trade
48
47
48
48
Overall EmployeesCompensation & BenefitsDiversity & Labor RightsTraining, Health & Safety
Walmart Inc.
55
52
51
60
Retail
50
51
49
49
General Merchandise Stores
53
52
52
54
Wholesale Trade
47
47
47
48
Overall EnvironmentEnergy & Climate ChangeEnvironment Policy & ReportingResource Management
Walmart Inc.
62
65
59
63
Retail
52
54
50
51
General Merchandise Stores
52
57
51
51
Wholesale Trade
48
51
46
48
Overall GovernanceBoardLeadership EthicsTransparency & Reporting
Walmart Inc.
57
62
55
54
Retail
51
50
51
51
General Merchandise Stores
50
51
51
49
Wholesale Trade
47
47
47
47
Walmart Inc.
58
57
55
62
57
Community Dev & Philanthropy
58
Compensation & Benefits
52
Energy & Climate Change
65
Board
62
Product
57
Diversity & Labor Rights
51
Environment Policy & Reporting
59
Leadership Ethics
55
Human Rights & Supply Chain
56
Training, Health & Safety
60
Resource Management
63
Transparency & Reporting
54
Retail
50
48
50
52
51
Community Dev & Philanthropy
50
Compensation & Benefits
51
Energy & Climate Change
54
Board
50
Product
46
Diversity & Labor Rights
49
Environment Policy & Reporting
50
Leadership Ethics
51
Human Rights & Supply Chain
48
Training, Health & Safety
49
Resource Management
51
Transparency & Reporting
51
General Merchandise Stores
52
52
53
52
50
Community Dev & Philanthropy
53
Compensation & Benefits
52
Energy & Climate Change
57
Board
51
Product
54
Diversity & Labor Rights
52
Environment Policy & Reporting
51
Leadership Ethics
51
Human Rights & Supply Chain
49
Training, Health & Safety
54
Resource Management
51
Transparency & Reporting
49
Wholesale Trade
50
48
47
48
47
Community Dev & Philanthropy
47
Compensation & Benefits
47
Energy & Climate Change
51
Board
47
Product
48
Diversity & Labor Rights
47
Environment Policy & Reporting
46
Leadership Ethics
47
Human Rights & Supply Chain
48
Training, Health & Safety
48
Resource Management
48
Transparency & Reporting
47
USA
50
50
52
47
54
Community Dev & Philanthropy
50
Compensation & Benefits
54
Energy & Climate Change
49
Board
54
Product
51
Diversity & Labor Rights
50
Environment Policy & Reporting
45
Leadership Ethics
54
Human Rights & Supply Chain
48
Training, Health & Safety
50
Resource Management
47
Transparency & Reporting
53
All company average
50
48
49
47
48
Community Dev & Philanthropy
48
Compensation & Benefits
50
Energy & Climate Change
49
Board
48
Product
48
Diversity & Labor Rights
49
Environment Policy & Reporting
46
Leadership Ethics
48
Human Rights & Supply Chain
48
Training, Health & Safety
49
Resource Management
47
Transparency & Reporting
48
Low
0-29
30-39
40-49
50-59
60-79
80-100
High
?
CSRHub Rating History For Walmart Inc.

There is no history for the selected element(s).

Click And Drag Within The Box Below To Select A Time Range
Add Or Remove Items For Comparison
Add...
CSRHub Ranking (%) History For Walmart Inc.

There is no history for the selected element(s).

Click And Drag Within The Box Below To Select A Time Range
Add Or Remove Items For Comparison
Add...
2 Special Issues Affect Walmart Inc.
Sustainable Forestry Supporter Trump Involved
Sustainable Forestry Supporter Trump Involved
# of Data Sources 2 1
Companies Affected # % # %
Retail 1 0.1 2 0.2
General Merchandise Stores 2 3.8 1 1.9
Wholesale Trade 2 0.4 1 0.2
All 55,637 Companies 191 0.3 13 0.0
CSRHub Has 90 Active Source(s) and 316 Total Source(s) for Walmart Inc.
out of 280 Active and 940 Total Sources for All Companies
90 Active Sources
226 Inactive Sources -- data from these sources is not used in the currently selected ratings set
Investigate 2193 Data Value(s) From 316 Active and Inactive Sources That Contribute To Walmart Inc.

List includes Data Source; Data Element; Original Data Value; Date Last Updated. (Items in green contribute to current ratings.

Items in blue contribute to historic ratings. For some companies and some subcategories, there may be too many data items to report them all.)

Source Element Minimum value Value Maximum value Data description
5050 Women on Boards Click here to see the 8 items available from this source
5050 Women on Boards The percentage of women on U.S. company boards 0.0% 24.0% 57.0% NA
5050 Women on Boards # of women 1 3 9 NA
5050 Women on Boards % of Women 0.0% 27.0% 64.0% the percentage of women on U.S. company boards
5050 Women on Boards City Bentonville
5050 Women on Boards Sector Consumer Defensive
5050 Women on Boards State AR
5050 Women on Boards 5050 Rating 0 3+ GB The number of women on the Board converted into a rating.
5050 Women on Boards Total Board 1 11 33 NA
3BL Media Members 3BL Member Yes Yes 3BL members team are served by content experts for advice, seamless formatting, content uploads, scheduling, tracking and more.
Big 4 Audit Clients Click here to see the 2 items available from this source
Big 4 Audit Clients Audited by Big 4 Yes Yes Big 4 audit clients are what arguably make the largest audit companies in the world worth working for. These companies, as you may already know, are Deloitte, PwC, Ernst & Young, and KPMG.
Big 4 Audit Clients Auditor Ernst & Young Name of the Big 4 Auditor
AccountAbility Top 100 most accountable companies according to AccountAbility 11.2 44.1 77.7 NA
American Family Association (AFA) Is a company Christmas friendly in its advertising? Naughty Nice Nice If a company has items associated with Christmas, but did not use the word "Christmas," then the company is considered as censoring "Christmas."
Alliance for Bangladesh Worker Safety Members of Alliance for Bangladesh Yes Yes NA
AMEE Click here to see the 22 items available from this source
AMEE water_status no_data NA
AMEE water_withdrawn_l NA NA
AMEE city NA NA
AMEE waste_status no_data NA
AMEE waste_hazardous_kg 72001000 NA 0 NA
AMEE waste_non_hazardous_kg 962755000 NA 0 NA
AMEE amee_industry_score 0 NA 100 NA
AMEE total_assets_local 1000 NA 1506867000000 NA
AMEE amee_score_status deprecated NA
AMEE country_code U.S.A. NA
AMEE emissions_scope1_tco2e NA NA
AMEE emissions_scope2_tco2e NA NA
AMEE emissions_status no_data NA
AMEE sustainability_report_url NA NA
AMEE sustainability_report_year NA NA
AMEE annual_sales_local 286 NA 240745100000 NA
AMEE Emissions per assets 2.8321 NA 0.0 NA
AMEE Emissions per employee 235484.5 NA 0.07 NA
AMEE Emissions per sale 4.2576 NA 2.8e-07 NA
AMEE emissions_total_tco2e 70790000 NA 9 NA
AMEE employees_total 1 NA 508714 NA
AMEE line_of_business NA NA
As you sow 2013 Click here to see the 4 items available from this source
As you sow 2013 Proxy resolution for the company http://www.asyousow.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/2013-walmart-reso.pdf# Web address for the resolution
As you sow 2013 Resolution Status Omitted Dialogue, Withdrawn Withdrawn Status of the company's multiple shareholder resolutions.
As you sow 2013 Resolution Summary As You Sow engaged in dialogue with Walmart, pressing the company to adopt extended producer responsibility policies to(…), Walmart is the second largest U.S. retailer of consumer electronics, and such devices contain toxic materials such as lead, (…) Individual resolution summary page
As you sow 2013 Issues Consumer Packaging, Electronic Waste Sustainability-related issues that companies are facing. Focuses on Bisphenol A, Carbon Bubble, Coal, Consumer Packaging, Electronic Waste, Executive Compensation, GMOs, Hydraulic Fracturing and Nanomaterials
Barron's Top 100 Sustainable Rank 100 74 1 Barron’s list of the Most Sustainable Companies in the United States.
Barron's Top 100 Sustainable 2023 Rank 100 21 1 Barron’s 2023 list of the Most Sustainable Companies in the United States.
Better Buying Purchasing Practice Index--Corporate 2020 Rated by Better Buying Suppliers Yes Yes The list of suppliers that registered on the Better BuyingTM platform.
Brand Finance 2008-09 Click here to see the 4 items available from this source
Brand Finance 2008-09 Enterprise Value 2008-09 277 244058 635959 NA
Brand Finance 2008-09 Brand Index 2008-09 34.5 71.8 94.7 NA
Brand Finance 2008-09 Brand Value 2008-09 77 40616 40616 NA
Brand Finance 2008-09 Group Global 500 NA
Brand Finance 2009-10 Click here to see the 4 items available from this source
Brand Finance 2009-10 Brand Value 2009-10 11 41365 41365 NA
Brand Finance 2009-10 Brand Index 2009-10 44.6 70.3 96.0 NA
Brand Finance 2009-10 Enterprise Value 2009-10 70 190803 528713 NA
Brand Finance 2009-10 Group Global 500 NA
Brand Finance 2010-11 Click here to see the 4 items available from this source
Brand Finance 2010-11 Enterprise Value 2010-11 0 154325 475066 NA
Brand Finance 2010-11 Brand Index 2010-11 44.0 71.2 98.4 NA
Brand Finance 2010-11 Brand Value 2010-11 28 36220 44294 NA
Brand Finance 2010-11 Group Global 500 NA
Brand Finance 2011-12 Click here to see the 8 items available from this source
Brand Finance 2011-12 Brand Value / Enterprise Value (%) -4816.5% 34.1% 316.60555871% NA
Brand Finance 2011-12 Brand Value 2012 $19799 NA
Brand Finance 2011-12 BSI 50.0 70.2 88.5 NA
Brand Finance 2011-12 Domicile UNITED STATES NA
Brand Finance 2011-12 Enterprise Value NA $69827 NA NA
Brand Finance 2011-12 Reviewed ? YES NA
Brand Finance 2011-12 Brand Rating 2012 B AA- AAA+ NA
Brand Finance 2011-12 Sector Consumer, Cyclical NA
Brand Finance 2012-13 Click here to see the 8 items available from this source
Brand Finance 2012-13 Brand Value 2013 $11 $20876 $67875 NA
Brand Finance 2012-13 BSI 50.0 70.2 89.6 NA
Brand Finance 2012-13 Domicile UNITED STATES NA
Brand Finance 2012-13 Sector Consumer, Cyclical NA
Brand Finance 2012-13 Brand Value / Enterprise Value (%) 1.0% 31.9% 4.7473237754% NA
Brand Finance 2012-13 Brand Rating 2013 BBB AA AAA+ NA
Brand Finance 2012-13 Enterprise Value 2013 $0 $80150 $435751
Brand Finance 2012-13 Reviewed SJD NA
Brand Finance 2013-14 Click here to see the 7 items available from this source
Brand Finance 2013-14 Brand Rating 2014 A- AA AAA+ These are calculated using Brand Finance's ßrandßeta® analysis which benchmarks the strength, risk and potential of a brand, relative to its competitors, on a scale ranging from AAA to D. It is conceptually similar to a credit rating. The data used to cal
Brand Finance 2013-14 Brand Value / Enterprise Value (%) 0.9% 24.6% 1.07% NA
Brand Finance 2013-14 Brand Value 2014 $10 $20876 $87304 A brand strength is assessed by using our Brand Strength Index framework. This benchmarks the strength, risk and future potential of a brand relative to its competitors by assessing input measures, brand equity measures, and output performance across four
Brand Finance 2013-14 BSI 51.3 74.1 94.2 NA
Brand Finance 2013-14 Domicile UNITED STATES NA
Brand Finance 2013-14 Enterprise Value 2014 $66 $86897 $526619 NA
Brand Finance 2013-14 Sector Consumer, Cyclical NA
Brand Finance 2014-15 Click here to see the 4 items available from this source
Brand Finance 2014-15 Brand Value 2015 $61 $23074 $128303 A brand strength is assessed by using our Brand Strength Index framework. This benchmarks the strength, risk and future potential of a brand relative to its competitors by assessing input measures, brand equity measures, and output performance across four
Brand Finance 2014-15 BSI 50.5 75.2 93.4 NA
Brand Finance 2014-15 Brand Rating 2015 A- AA AAA+ These are calculated using Brand Finance's ßrandßeta® analysis which benchmarks the strength, risk and potential of a brand, relative to its competitors, on a scale ranging from AAA to D. It is conceptually similar to a credit rating. The data used to cal
Brand Finance 2014-15 Enterprise Value 2015 $0 $101302 $438990 NA
Brand Finance 2015-16 Click here to see the 4 items available from this source
Brand Finance 2015-16 Brand Rating 2016 A- AA AAA+ These are calculated using Brand Finance's ßrandßeta® analysis which benchmarks the strength, risk and potential of a brand, relative to its competitors, on a scale ranging from AAA to D. It is conceptually similar to a credit rating.
Brand Finance 2015-16 Brand Value 2016 10 54452 37216 A brand strength is assessed by using our Brand Strength Index framework. This benchmarks the strength, risk and future potential of a brand relative to its competitors by assessing input measures, brand equity measures, and output performance across four
Brand Finance 2015-16 BSI 42 70 159 NA
Brand Finance 2015-16 Enterprise Value 2016 0 162590 498735 NA
Brand Finance 2016-17 Click here to see the 4 items available from this source
Brand Finance 2016-17 Brand Rating 2017 AA+ These are calculated using Brand Finance's ßrandßeta® analysis which benchmarks the strength, risk and potential of a brand, relative to its competitors, on a scale ranging from AAA to D. It is conceptually similar to a credit rating.
Brand Finance 2016-17 Brand Value 2017 156410.0729 A brand strength is assessed by using our Brand Strength Index framework. This benchmarks the strength, risk and future potential of a brand relative to its competitors by assessing input measures, brand equity measures, and output performance across four
Brand Finance 2016-17 BSI 74.6093 NA
Brand Finance 2016-17 Enterprise Value 2017 479638.7535 NA
Brand Finance 2017-18 Click here to see the 4 items available from this source
Brand Finance 2017-18 Brand Rating BBB AA+ AAA+ These are calculated using Brand Finance's ßrandßeta® analysis which benchmarks the strength, risk and potential of a brand, relative to its competitors, on a scale ranging from AAA to D. It is conceptually similar to a credit rating.
Brand Finance 2017-18 Brand Value 33 150750 452433 A brand strength is assessed by using our Brand Strength Index framework. This benchmarks the strength, risk and future potential of a brand relative to its competitors by assessing input measures, brand equity measures, and output performance.
Brand Finance 2017-18 BSI 46 446 1177 Brand Strength Index
Brand Finance 2017-18 Enterprise Value 189 503712 1676673 Millions of dollars
Brand Finance 2018-19 Click here to see the 4 items available from this source
Brand Finance 2018-19 BSI 49.9 222.4 349.7 NA
Brand Finance 2018-19 Enterprise Value $0 $284472 $920690 NA
Brand Finance 2018-19 Brand Rating A- AA+ AAA+ These are calculated using Brand Finance's ßrandßeta® analysis which benchmarks the strength, risk and potential of a brand, relative to its competitors, on a scale ranging from AAA to D. It is conceptually similar to a credit rating.
Brand Finance 2018-19 Brand Value $4168 $83593 $187905 A brand strength is assessed by using our Brand Strength Index framework. This benchmarks the strength, risk and future potential of a brand relative to its competitors by assessing input measures, brand equity measures, and output performance across four
Brand Finance 2019-20 Click here to see the 4 items available from this source
Brand Finance 2019-20 Brand Rating BBB AA+ AAA+ These are calculated using Brand Finance's ßrandßeta® analysis which benchmarks the strength, risk and potential of a brand, relative to its competitors, on a scale ranging from AAA to D. It is conceptually similar to a credit rating.
Brand Finance 2019-20 Brand Value $4168 $77520 $187905 A brand strength is assessed by using our Brand Strength Index framework. This benchmarks the strength, risk and future potential of a brand relative to its competitors by assessing input measures, brand equity measures, and output performance across four
Brand Finance 2019-20 BSI 46.0 78.9 95.0
Brand Finance 2019-20 Enterprise Value $0 $306775 $920690
Brand Finance 2020-21 Brand Rating BB A+ AAA+ These are calculated using Brand Finance's ßrandßeta® analysis which benchmarks the strength, risk and potential of a brand, relative to its competitors, on a scale ranging from AAA to D. It is conceptually similar to a credit rating.
Brand Finance 2021-22 Brand Rating A AAA- AAA+ These are calculated using Brand Finance's ßrandßeta® analysis which benchmarks the strength, risk and potential of a brand, relative to its competitors, on a scale ranging from AAA to D. It is conceptually similar to a credit rating.
Brand Finance 2022-23 Brand Rating 2 9 11 These are calculated using Brand Finance's ßrandßeta® analysis which benchmarks the strength, risk and potential of a brand, relative to its competitors, on a scale ranging from AAA to D. It is conceptually similar to a credit rating.
BlackEngineer Most Admired Companies 2009 Most Admired Companies for Minority Professionals in 2009 100 37 1 Most Admired Companies for Minority Professionals in 2009 were chosen based on a survey completed by hundreds of respondents that consists of 64 questions given to Hispanic, Native American, Asian, black, and other employees in science, technology, engine
BlackEngineer Most Admired Companies 2011 Most Admired Companies for Minority Professionals in 2011 Killer's Row Killer’s Row The Top Twenty Most Admired Companies for Minority Professionals in 2011 were chosen based on a survey completed by hundreds of respondents that consists of 64 questions given to Hispanic, Native American, Asian, black, and other employees.
Best Workplace for Commuters 2009 Best Workplace for Commuters list NA Yes Yes NA
Better World Companies Better World product rating F F A+ Better World Shopper is a site dedicated to providing people with a comprehensive, up-to-date, reliable account of the social and environmental responsibility of every company on the planet AND making it available in practical forms.
Climate Action 100+ Assessments Click here to see the 13 items available from this source
Climate Action 100+ Assessments Capital allocation alignment N N Partial The company is working to decarbonise its future capital expenditures.
Climate Action 100+ Assessments Climate Governance N Partial Y The company’s board has clear oversight of climate change.
Climate Action 100+ Assessments Climate policy engagement N Partial Y The company has a Paris-Agreement-aligned climate lobbying position and all of its direct lobbying activities are aligned with this.
Climate Action 100+ Assessments Decarbonisation strategy N Partial Y The company has a decarbonisation strategy to meet its long and medium-term GHG reduction targets
Climate Action 100+ Assessments Just transition Not assessed Not assessed The company considers the impacts from transitioning to a lower-carbon business model on its workers and communities
Climate Action 100+ Assessments Long-term (2036-2050) GHG reduction target(s) N Partial Y The company has set a target for reducing its GHG emissions by between 2036 and 2050 on a clearly defined scope of emissions.
Climate Action 100+ Assessments Medium-term (2026-2035) GHG reduction target(s) N Y Y The company has set a medium-term 2026 to 2035) targets for reducing its GHG emissions. The company has set a target for reducing its GHG emissions by between 2026 and 2035 on a clearly defined scope of emissions.
Climate Action 100+ Assessments Net-zero GHG Emissions by 2050 (or sooner) ambition N Partial Y The company has set an ambition to achieve net-zero GHG emissions by 2050 or sooner.
Climate Action 100+ Assessments Scope 3 cat Yes (purchased goods and services - Category 1 of the GHG protocol) Scope 3 GHG Emissions - Indirect Emissions that are not owned and not directly controlled by the reporting company.
Climate Action 100+ Assessments Scope 3 cat-detail Yes (purchased goods and services - Category 1 of the GHG protocol) Details of Scope 3 GHG Emissions - Indirect Emissions that are not owned and not directly controlled by the reporting company.
Climate Action 100+ Assessments Short-term (up to 2025) GHG reduction target(s) N Partial Y The short-term up to 2025) GHG reduction target covers at least 95% of scope 1 & 2 emissions and the most relevant scope 3 emissions where applicable)
Climate Action 100+ Assessments TCFD Disclosure N Partial Y The company has committed to implement the recommendations of the Taskforce on Climate- related Financial Disclosures TCFD).
Climate Action 100+ Assessments Secondary sector Not applicable Secondary business sector
CalPERS Proxy Voting 2012 Click here to see the 3 items available from this source
CalPERS Proxy Voting 2012 Annual Meeting Date 41461 NA
CalPERS Proxy Voting 2012 Proxy filed Yes NA
CalPERS Proxy Voting 2012 Proxy voting decisions for the company http://www.calpers-governance.org/proxyvoting/proxy/ticker-results?ticker=WMT NA
CalPERS Proxy Voting 2014 Click here to see the 3 items available from this source
CalPERS Proxy Voting 2014 Annual Meeting Date 6/6/2014 NA
CalPERS Proxy Voting 2014 Proxy voting decisions for the company http://www.calpers-governance.org/proxyvoting/proxy/ticker-results?ticker=WMT# NA
CalPERS Proxy Voting 2014 Proxy filed Yes Yes No NA
CalPERS Proxy Voting 2015 Click here to see the 3 items available from this source
CalPERS Proxy Voting 2015 Proxy filed Yes Yes No NA
CalPERS Proxy Voting 2015 Proxy voting decisions for the company 4,959,910 NA
CalPERS Proxy Voting 2015 Annual Meeting Date June 5, 2015 NA
Corporate Climate Action Transparency Index (CATI) Click here to see the 2 items available from this source
Corporate Climate Action Transparency Index (CATI) CATI Score 0.0 34.4 79.8 The Corporate Climate Action Transparency Index (CATI) dynamically assesses corporates’ climate action across their value chain. CATI aims to direct corporates' focus and efforts to reducing GHG emissions from their emissions hotspots and disclose carbon
Corporate Climate Action Transparency Index (CATI) Industry Retailers,Textile
Carbon Disclosure Project 2006 and 2007 Click here to see the 3 items available from this source
Carbon Disclosure Project 2006 and 2007 Please indicate whether you publish information about the risks and opportunities presented to your company by climate change, details of your GHG emissions and plans to reduce emissions through any of the following communications: i) the company’s Annual No NA Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2006 and 2007 Response State Declined to participate Answered questionnaire online Answered questionnaire NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2006 and 2007 % of purchased electricity from renewable sources 0.0% 0.0% 45.5% NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 Click here to see the 19 items available from this source
Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 Do you forecast your company’s future emissions and/or energy use? no response Yes, we do. (Please answer questions (i) to (iii) below.) answered
Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 Do you invest in, or have plans to invest in products and services that are designed to minimize or adapt to the effects of climate change? no response Climate change has led to investment or planned investment in order to maximise climate change opportunities. answered
Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 Please indicate whether you publish information about the risks and opportunities presented to your company by climate change, details of your GHG emissions and plans to reduce emissions through any of the following communications: i) the company’s Annual no response No answered
Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 Does a Board Committee or other executive body have overall responsibility for climate change? If not, please state how overall responsibility for climate change is managed. If so, please answer parts (i) and (ii) below. no response No executive body has overall responsibility for climate change. answered
Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 (i) Has the information reported in response to Questions 2(b)- (c) been externally verified or audited or do you plan to have the information verified or audited? no response Yes (Please go to 2(d)(ii)) answered
Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 Do you assess or provide incentive mechanisms for individual management of climate change issues including attainment of GHG targets? If so, please provide details. no response No, we do not. answered
Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 % of purchased electricity from renewable sources 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 Does your company have a system in place to assess the accuracy of GHG emissions inventory calculation methods, data processes and other systems relating to GHG measurement? If so, please provide details. If not, please explain how data accuracy is manag no response Yes, we do have a system. answered
Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 Do you engage with policymakers on possible responses to climate change including taxation, regulation and carbon trading? If so, please provide details. no response Yes answered
Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 iii) Has your company developed emissions intensity targets? no response Yes, we have developed emission intensity targets. (Please answer questions (a) and (b) below.) answered
Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 Please specify the methodology used by your company to calculate GHG emissions. no response NA answered
Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 Response State No Response Answered questionnaire online
Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 Section 2 Index 1596
Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 Section 3 Index 1371
Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 Section 4 Index 1255
Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 iii) voluntary communications such as Corporate Social Responsibility reporting no response Yes answered
Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 General and regulatory risks management no response We have taken or planned action. answered
Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 i) Does your company have a GHG emissions reduction plan in place? If so, please provide details along with the information requested below. If there is currently no plan in place, please explain why. no response Yes, we have a reduction plan in place. (Please proceed to part (ii) ) answered
Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 ii) formal communications with shareholders or external parties no response Yes answered
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data Click here to see the 195 items available from this source
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 18.5. Specify the standard against which the information has been verified/assured. NA “Corporate Greenhouse Gas Verification Guideline”, ERT, Washington DC, June 2005, www.ert.net/pubs/ERTCGVG.pdf NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 18.6. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 18.6. Further information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 18.6. If none of the information provided in response to questions 10-15 has been verified in whole or in part, please state whether you have plans for GHG emissions accounting information to be externally verified/assured in future. NA Wal-Mart currently plans to have this year's submission externally verified in the future. NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 19.1. Do you gather emissions data? NA Emission data is gathered. NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 19.1. What are the main sources of uncertainty in your data gathering, handling and calculations e.g.: data gaps, assumptions, extrapolation, metering/measurement inaccuracies etc? NA Below, we describe parameter uncertainties associated with our GHG inventory, the percent of the inventory characterized by each uncertainty type, and an associated margin of error. Margin of error was either calculated from GHG estimating guidance docum NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 19.2. How do the main sources of uncertainty in your data gathering, handling and calculations affect the accuracy of the reported data in percentage terms or an estimated standard deviation? NA Based on the areas of uncertainty identified above, we have calculated our total inventory uncertainty according to the following methodology: Identify the percent of each emissions source’s (e.g., onsite diesel fuel) contribution in tons C NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 16.2. Please supply an activity related intensity measurement for the reporting year for your combined Scope 1 and 2 emissions. NA The activity related intensity measurement is metric tons of GHG emissions per gross square foot of retail space. An activity related intensity measurement that is tied to retail gross square footage would be considered an appropriate indicator of activi NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 16.2.1. Give the units e.g. metric tonnes of CO2-e per metric tonne of output or for service sector businesses per unit of service provided. NA Metric tonnes of CO2-e per gross square foot of store area. NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 16.2.2. Activity related intensity measurement - Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 16.2.2. Activity related intensity measurement - Further information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 16.2.2. The resulting figure. NA 0.0198 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 17.1. Comments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 17.1. Do emissions for the reporting year vary significantly compared to previous years? No - Please go to question 18. No - Please go to question 18. Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 17.1.1 Further information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 17.1.1. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 17.1.1. Have the emissions increased or decreased? increased decreased
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 17.1.1. If the answer to 17.1 is Yes, estimate the percentage by which emissions vary compared with the previous reporting. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 20.1.1. Steam - Currency NA United States dollar NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 6.1. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 6.1. Other opportunities NA Climate change presents other opportunities for my company. NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 21.1. Does your company operate or have ownership of facilities covered by the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS)? No (Please go to question 22.) No (Please go to question 22.) Yes (Please answer the following questions - 21.2 to 21.4)
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 9.4 The global warming potentials you have applied and their origin. NA IPCC NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 18.2. Please use the text box below to describe the scope/boundary of emissions included within the verification/assurance exercise if the tick box menu options above are not applicable. NA Wal-Mart has previously received external verification through ERT/Winrock International for its entire corporate GHG inventory. Additionally, Wal-Mart has retained Clear Carbon Consulting (www.clearcarbonconsulting.com) to provide additional expertise i NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 18.2. State the scope/boundary of emissions included within the verification/assurance exercise. NA Scope 1 and Scope 2 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 14.1 Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 14.1 Further information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 3.1. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data Response State No response Answered questionnaire online Answered questionnaire
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data SEDOL NA 2316170 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 20.2. Select currency NA United States dollar NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 20.2. The total cost of fuel purchased by your company for mobile and stationary combustion. NA 974897024 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 11.5 Further Information NA Totals may not equal sum of individual components due to independent rounding. NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 19.3.1 Please provide the name of the scheme. NA Other NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 21.2. 2009 NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 14.1. If your goods and/or services enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party, please provide details including the estimated avoided emissions, the anticipated timescale over which the emissions are avoided and the methodology, assumptions, emi NA Wal-Mart has numerous initiatives underway with its goods and services to enable GHG emissions to be avoided by third parties, its customers. By reducing the number of plastic shopping bags we give away, we can reduce the amount of waste that ends up in NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 15.1. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 15.1. Further information NA These emissions are from Brazil Ethanol and US E85 fuel. NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 13.3 State the methodology, assumptions, calculation tools, databases, emission factors (including sources) and global warming potentials (including sources) you have used for calculating emissions. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 20.4. Your company’s total consumption in MWh of fuels for stationary combustion only. This includes purchased fuels, as well as biomass and self-produced fuels where relevant. NA 7843496 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 21.2. The allowances allocated for free for each year of Phase II for facilities which you operate or own. (Even if you do not wholly own facilities, please give the full number of allowances). - Year 2008 NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 20.1.1. Electricity - Currency NA United States dollar NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 5.1. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 12.2. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 9.1. Select methodologies used to calculate Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions. NA Greenhouse Gas Protocol NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 9.5 Attachments NA http://cdp.cdproject.net/cdp7/attachedfiles/Responses/54400/9300/CDP Response 9 Walmart_GWP_and_Emission_Factors_Report.xls NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 9.5 Further Information NA Because the CDP reporting system's copy&paste limitations for the text box result in formatting issues, we are attaching an Excel file that contains properly formatted tables with Wal-Mart's global warming potentials, emissions factors, and their origins. NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 10.6 Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 18.4. Provide a copy of the verification/assurance statement. NA http://cdp.cdproject.net/cdp7/attachedfiles/Responses/54400/8947/ERT_WalMart_Final 2007 VS_111408 (5).doc NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 15.1. Please provide the total global carbon dioxide emissions in metric tonnes CO2 from biologically sequestered carbon. NA 217 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 16.1. Please supply a financial emissions intensity measurement for the reporting year for your combined Scope 1 and 2 emissions. NA The financial emissions intensity measurement that is used for our Corporate Sustainability Report is metric tons of GHG emissions per US dollar of sales. A financial intensity measurement that is tied to sales revenue is considered an appropriate indica NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 16.1.1. Give the units. For example, the units could be metric tonnes of CO2-e per million Yen of turnover, metric tonnes of CO2-e per US$ of profit, metric tonnes of CO2-e per thousand Euros of turnover. NA The financial emissions intensity unit of measurement is metric tonnes of CO2-e per US$ of sales revenue. The unit used to report global sales revenue is the US dollar. As Wal-Mart serves customers in 16 markets worldwide, we recognize that foreign curr NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 16.1.2. The resulting figure. NA 5.251e-005 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 1.1. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 13.3 Use/disposal of company’s products and services NA At Wal-Mart, one of our company-wide sustainability goals is to generate zero net waste. By increasing our recycling efforts and eliminating unnecessary waste, our Waste Network is working to eliminate landfill waste generated by our operations by 2025. A NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 13.4 Emissions in metric tonnes CO2-e. NA At this time, while we have undertaken many initiatives to reduce emissions from the use or disposal of the company's goods and services, we are not able to quantify them. NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 13.6 If you have not provided information about one or more of the categories of Scope 3 GHG emissions in response to the questions above, please explain your reasons and describe any plans you have for collecting Scope 3 indirect emissions information in NA Wal-Mart does not currently have systems in place that will allow us to accurately track commercial employee business travel. While it is not believed that our commercial business travel is a significant source of emissions compared to our Scope 1 and Sc NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 20.8. Further information NA For question 20.1.1, our process hot/cold water is accounted for as one combined cost items so this is treated as energy type Steam. For question 20.5, these stationary combustion fuels are primarily use for heating and process and are not intended NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 12.2. If you retire any certificates (eg: Renewable Energy Certificates) associated with zero or low carbon electricity, please provide details. NA In 2008, Wal-Mart Canada retired 23,827 green power certificates through a third-party supplier. Each green power certificate represents the rights and benefits to the environmental attributes associated with the generation of 1 MWh of green power, defin NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 9.5 The emission factors you have applied and their origin. NA WRI, E-grid, Defra, Climate Leaders NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 24.1. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 24.1. Further information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 23.8. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 23.8. Further information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data Scope 1 forecasted emissions in Table 15 below are in the following units. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 20.1.1. Heat - Currency NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 20.1.1. Please break down the costs by individual energy type. - Electricity NA 2637644174 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 20.1.1. Steam NA 1631344 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 19.3.2. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 19.3.2. Further information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 13.5 Non-transfers - Describe the main sources of emissions NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 13.1 Describe the main sources of emissions for employee business travel NA A large part of Wal-Mart’s business travel is conducted on company-owned aircraft and vehicles, which are included in the Scope 1 mobile fuel emissions reported above. At this time, Wal-Mart does not track commercial business travel emissions data becaus NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 13.1 Emissions in metric tonnes CO2-e. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 20.1.1. Heat NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 19.3.1. More information NA The name of the scheme is The Climate Registry. NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 13.3 Emissions in metric tonnes CO2-e. NA At this time, while we have undertaken many initiatives to reduce emissions from the use or disposal of the company's goods and services, we are not able to quantify them. NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 23.2. If not, please explain why. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 23.2. If the menu options above are not appropriate, please answer the question using the text box below: NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 23.3. Do you have an emissions and/or energy reduction target(s)? No. (Please go to question 23.8) Yes. (Please answer the following questions) Yes. (Please answer the following questions)
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 23.4 What is the baseline year for the target(s)? NA The baseline year is 2005. The baseline year forms a fixed basis against which to compare emissions in future years, as defined in Chapter 11, p. 79 of the GHG Protocol. NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 20.1. Select currency NA United States dollar NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 20.1. The total cost of electricity, heat, steam and cooling purchased by your company. NA 2639275517 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 20.1.1. Cooling NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 20.1.1. Cooling - Currency NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 23.8. What activities are you undertaking or planning to undertake to reduce your emissions/energy use? NA Wal-Mart is designing and building more energy-efficient stores to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Through a process of experimenting, piloting, and then implementing new building technologies, Wal-Mart is able to improve its new store prototype, retrof NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 23.9. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 23.9. Further information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 23.9. What benchmarks or key performance indicators do you use to assess progress against the emissions/energy reduction goals you have set? NA To provide a directional assessment of progress against the emissions reduction goal, Wal-Mart uses a web-based tool to track global implementation of retrofit projects that promote energy efficiency and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. This online track NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data Reporting Historical Data NA No NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 20.8. What percentage of the renewable energy reported in response to question 20.6 is exported/sold by your company to the grid or to third parties? NA 0 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 24.1. How do you factor the cost of future emissions into capital expenditures and what impact have those estimated costs had on your investment decisions? NA Although under analysis, at this time we are unable to specifically identify potential costs from future emissions to a level that would enable incorporation into financial modeling. However, we do expect that in the future there will be enough certainty NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 21.2. 2010 NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 22.4 Provide details including the type of unit, volume and vintage purchased and the standard/scheme against which the credits have been verified, issued and retired (where applicable). NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 22.5. Have you been involved in the origination of project-based carbon credits? No. (Please go to question 22.7) No. (Please go to question 22.7) Yes. (Please answer the following question)
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 18.1. Has any of the information reported in response to questions 10 – 15 been externally verified/assured in whole or in part? No information has been provided in response to questions 10-15. Please go to question 19. Yes, it has been externally verified/assured in whole or in part.(Please continue with questions 18.2 to 18.5) Yes, it has been externally verified/assured in whole or in part.(Please continue with questions 18.2 to 18.5)
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 21.3. The total allowances purchased through national auctioning processes for the period 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2008 for facilities that you operate or own. (Even if you do not wholly own facilities, please give the total allowances purchased thro NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 21.4. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 21.4. Further information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 18.3. State what level of assurance (eg: reasonable or limited) has been given. NA Tier II: A Tier II-level verification is appropriate for basic reporting, and those voluntary efforts and public commitments for which there are no imminent requirements for compliance obligations or emissions trading. It is intended to establish the bas NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 7.1. Date selected is NA Other Date NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 9.3 The names of and links to any calculation tools used. NA We retained Clear Carbon Consulting (CCC) to calculate our 2005-2008 GHG inventories. CCC has developed an internal application used for all of CCC’s corporate inventories. By using a central application, we ensure that the most current emission factors NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 9.2 Details of any assumptions made. NA As with any corporate inventory, there is usually a small amount of activity data that is missing or not accessible. However, data for our 2008 inventory was our most complete set of actual activity data to date and required very little estimations. Bel NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 12.2. Further information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 1.1. Regulatory Risks NA We consider our company to be exposed to regulatory risks. NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 10.5 SF6 NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 23.5. What is the emissions and/or energy reduction target(s)? NA We have several targets that use 2005 as the baseline year. The following goals are stated on page 7 of Lee Scott's 21st Century Leadership speech, dated 10/24/05: “Reducing greenhouse gases at our existing store, club and DC base around t NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 22.3. Please indicate whether the credits are to meet one or more of the following commitments: NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 7.1. More information NA Wal-Mart chose to use calendar year for its footprint determination prior participating in the CDP. Our baseline for emissions reduction goals is calendar year 2005. NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 7.1. Please state the end date of the year for which you are reporting GHG emissions. NA 31/12/2008 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 7.1. Please state the start date of the year for which you are reporting GHG emissions. NA 01/01/2008 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 8.1. More information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 8.1. Please indicate the category that describes the company, entities, or group for which Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions are reported. NA Companies over which operational control is exercised. NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 8.2. Please state whether any parts of your business or sources of GHG emissions are excluded from your reporting boundary. NA All aspects of Wal-Mart’s business over which it has operational control are included in the reporting boundary. NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 21.4. Total CO2 emissions for 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2008 for facilities which you operate or own as a % of total revenue. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 22.1. More information NA Wal-Mat does not currently participate in any emissions trading scheme. However, within the next two years, Wal-Mart anticipates participation in schemes for the UK and for Tokyo, Japan. The UK emissions trading scheme is the Carbon Reduct NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 13.5 Transfers -State the methodology, assumptions, calculation tools, databases, emission factors (including sources) and global warming potentials (including sources) you have used for calculating emissions. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 13.6 Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 13.6 Further information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 22.1. Please provide details of any emissions trading schemes, other than the EU ETS, in which your company already participates or is likely to participate within the next two years. We do not participate or anticipate participating in any trading schemes within the next two years. (Please go to question 22.3) We participate or anticipate participating in trading schemes other than the EU ETS in the next two years. We participate or anticipate participating in trading schemes other than the EU ETS in the next two years.
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 22.2. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 22.2. Further information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 22.2. What is your overall strategy for complying with any schemes in which you are required or have elected to participate, including the EU ETS? NA This question is not yet applicable, since Wal-Mart is not required and has not elected to participate in any scheme. For the upcoming emissions trading schemes that Wal-Mart is likely to participate in, Wal-Mart’s overall strategy is to comply with all NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 13.5 Transfers - Report emissions in metric tonnes of CO2-e. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 9.3 Select calculation tools: NA CCC has developed an internal application used for all of CCC’s corporate inventories. By using a central application, we ensure that the most current emission factors are used, enforce referential integrity to make sure all of the data are calculated, a NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 11.5. If you have not provided any information about Scope 2 emissions in response to the questions above, please explain your reasons and describe any plans you have for collecting Scope 2 GHG emissions information in future. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 13.1 State the methodology, assumptions, calculation tools, databases, emission factors (including sources) and global warming potentials (including sources) you have used for calculating emissions. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 13.2. External distribution/logistics NA At this time, Wal-Mart is not reporting Scope 3 emissions from distribution and logistics. It should be noted that unlike many retailers, much of Wal-Mart’s product distribution is performed by Wal-Mart’s owned fleet of tractors and trailers, which are i NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 20.7. What percentage of the energy reported in response to question 20.5 is exported/sold by your company to the grid or to third parties? NA 0 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 20.8. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 13.4 State the methodology, assumptions, calculation tools, databases, emission factors (including sources) and global warming potentials (including sources) you have used for calculating emissions. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 13.4. Company supply chain - Describe the main sources of emissions. NA Wal-Mart recognizes the importance of supply chain carbon management and has been engaging its suppliers on sustainability since 2005. Although the company is not reporting supply chain emissions for 2008, using preliminary macro-economic assessments, we NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 21.2. 2011 NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 21.2. 2012 NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 19.3. Does your company report GHG emissions under any mandatory or voluntary scheme (other than CDP) that requires an accuracy assessment? No (Please go to question 20.) Yes (Please answer the following questions - 19.3.1, 19.3.2). Yes (Please answer the following questions - 19.3.1, 19.3.2).
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 20.5. What is the total amount of energy generated in MWh from the fuels reported in question 20.4? NA 7843496 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 20.6. What is the total amount in MWh of renewable energy, excluding biomass, that is self-generated by your company? NA 164 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data Scope 2 forecasted emissions in Table 15 below are in the following units. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 6.1. Description NA We are currently deploying a Supplier Energy Efficiency Program (SEEP) that will enable low cost technology transfer throughout our supply network. It is our hope that this will form the basis of an energy efficiency model that can be adopted by any priva NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 10.1 Total Scope 1 CO2-e NA 5566006 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 10.5 CH4 NA 4754 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 10.5 CO2 NA 3114116 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 1.1. Description NA Yes, Wal-Mart is exposed to regulatory risks related to climate change. Wal-Mart’s process for identifying regulatory risk is to gather regulatory information from a broad variety of sources including: consulting firms, government organizations and NGOs, NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 1.1. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 10.6 Further Information NA Totals may not equal sum of individual components due to independent rounding. NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 13.2 Emissions in metric tonnes CO2-e. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 22.3. Have you purchased any project-based carbon credits? No. (Please go to question 22.5) No. (Please go to question 22.5) Yes. (Please answer the following questions)
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 23.14. Please estimate your company’s future energy use for the next five years for each of the main territories or regions in which you operate or provide a qualitative explanation for expected changes that could impact future GHG emissions. NA Due to competitive reasons, global and regional forecasts for energy use cannot be disclosed. With the company acquiring, building, and/or expanding stores, absolute energy usage for Wal-Mart is expected to increase over the next five years due to organi NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 23.15. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 23.15. Further information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 23.15. Please explain the methodology used for your estimations and any assumptions made. NA The methodology to estimate downward trends in emissions and energy use is based on the assumption that the existing store base will be made more efficient and emit less greenhouse gases over time due to the continued implementation of energy efficiency a NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 3.1. Other Risks NA We consider our company to be exposed to other risks. NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 4.1. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 4.1. Description NA Wal-Mart believes potential opportunities exist, under a well designed cap-and-trade system, to use the financial value of carbon to "roll back" the price of low carbon products. Such a mechanism would create and encourage meaningful technology adoption b NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 4.1. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 4.1. Regulatory opportunities NA Regulatory requirements present opportunities for my company. NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 10.5 HFCs NA 2430555 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 10.5 N2O NA 53 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 10.5 PFCs NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 2.1. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 2.1. Physical Risks NA We consider our company to be exposed to physical risks. NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 22.8. Please provide details of the role performed. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 22.6. Please provide details including: Your role in the project(s), the locations and technologies involved; The standard/scheme under which the projects are being/have been developed; Whether emissions reductions have been validated or verified, NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 23.6. What are the sources or activities to which the target(s) applies? NA The GHG emissions reduction target encompasses the six major greenhouse gases: carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6). The target applies globally to sto NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 23.7. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 23.7. Further information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 23.7. Over what period/timescale does the target(s) extend? NA For the GHG emissions reduction target, the target extends over 7 years, with 2005 as the baseline year. The target year for achieving the goal is year ending 2012. For the fleet efficiency targets, the target extends over the 2005-2015 pe NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 12.1. If you consider that the grid average factor used to report Scope 2 emissions in question 11 does not reflect the contractual arrangements you have with electricity suppliers, (for example, because you purchase electricity using a zero or low carbon NA Wal-Mart has several contractual arrangements that support the generation of renewable electricity. In the US, we have agreements for solar and wind power purchases, while in Japan, there is a wind purchase program. In 2008, the contractual Scope 2 emis NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data ISIN NA ARDEUT110400 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 5.1. Description NA At this time, we are unable to identify any specific physical opportunities that rise to a level that would enable commercial action. Wal-Mart’s process for identifying risk or opportunity is to gather relevant information from as broad a NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 5.1. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 5.1. Physical opportunities NA We don’t know the answer to this question. NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 6.1. Attachments NA http://cdp.cdproject.net/cdp7/attachedfiles/Responses/54400/9677/SEEP Stats thru 2008.xls NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 3.1. Description NA In addition to regulatory and physical risks, we have the general risk of resource availability constraints, caused by climate change, which could pressure our supply chain in the forms of product scarcity, restricted manufacturing capacity, or delivery o NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 3.1. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 22.7. Are you involved in the trading of allowances under the EU ETS and/or project-based carbon credits as a separate business activity, or in direct support of a business activity such as investment fund management or the provision of offsetting service No. (Please go to question 23) No. (Please go to question 23) Yes. (Please answer the following question)
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 22.8. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 22.8. Further information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 9.1. Please describe the process used by your company to calculate Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions including the name of the standard, protocol or methodology you have used to collect activity data and calculate Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions. NA Wal-Mart utilized publically available emissions sources and guidance from the World Resource Institute’s GHG protocol. Additionally, Wal-Mart retained Clear Carbon Consulting (www.clearcarbonconsulting.com) to help coordinate and execute our GHG invento NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 19.3.2. Please provide the accuracy assessment for GHG emissions reported under that scheme for the last report delivered. NA For 2007 emissions reported under this scheme, the accuracy assessment provided to The Climate Registry was made by an independent third-party verifier. In the accuracy assessment report, the verifier stated that “Based on its review of Wal-Mart’s GHG em NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 2.1. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 2.1. Description NA Yes, Wal-Mart is exposed to physical risks related to climate change. If future weather patterns shift due to climate change, there could be effects on our operations. Rising sea levels, stronger or more frequent hurricanes, droughts, wild fires, floodi NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 20.3 Your company’s total consumption of purchased energy in MWh. NA 26555572 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 20.4. In answering this question and the one below, you will have used either Higher Heating Values (also known as Gross Calorific Values) or Lower Heating Values (also known as Net Calorific Values). NA All fuels are converted to MWh using Higher Heating Values. NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 13.2 State the methodology, assumptions, calculation tools, databases, emission factors (including sources) and global warming potentials (including sources) you have used for calculating emissions. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 10.6. If you have not provided any information about Scope 1 emissions in response to the questions above, please explain your reasons and describe any plans you have for collecting Scope 1 GHG emissions information in future. NA We have applied GWP's from IPCC's Second Assessment Report (SAR) to convert all non-CO2 gases into CO2-equivalents as shown below for N2O, CH4, and the refrigerants used in our facilities’ HVAC and refrigeration equipment. Many of our refrigerants are bl NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 11.1 Total Scope 2 CO2-e NA 15500950 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 11.5 Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 13.5 Non-transfers - Report emissions in metric tonnes of CO2-e. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 13.5 Other NA Wal-Mart is continuing to evaluate our carbon footprint and may expand GHG assessments to some Scope 3 components in the future. NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 10.1 Please tick the box if your total gross global Scope 1 figure (Q10.1) includes emissions that you have transferred outside your reporting boundary (as given in answer to 8.1). Please report these transfers under 13.5. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 23.1. Does your company have a GHG emissions and/or energy reduction plan in place? No. (Please answer the following question and then continue with 23.3) Yes. (Please go to question 23.3) Yes. (Please go to question 23.3)
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 23.10. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 23.10. Further information NA We are unable to disclose future investments in truck fleet efficiency measures at this point. Such investments are difficult to estimate until we are more certain of the path we will pursue (e.g. operational changes vs. technology changes). NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 23.10. What emissions reductions, energy savings and associated cost savings have been achieved to date as a result of the plan and/or the activities described above? Please state the methodology and data sources you have used for calculating these reduct NA From fiscal years 2007 to 2009, the estimated cumulative GHG savings is 1,332,746 metric tons from reported retrofit energy efficiency/emission reduction projects that were implemented across Wal-Mart’s global operations. The GHG savings were calculated NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 23.13. Please estimate your company’s future Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions for the next five years for each of the main territories or regions in which you operate or provide a qualitative explanation for expected changes that could impact future GHG emis NA Due to competitive reasons, global and regional forecasts for emissions cannot be disclosed. With the company acquiring, building, and/or expanding stores, absolute emissions for Wal-Mart are expected to increase over the next five years due to organic g NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data Click here to see the 138 items available from this source
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 19.1. Do the absolute emissions (Scope 1 and Scope 2 combined) for the reporting year vary significantly compared to the previous year? NA No NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 19.2. Please explain why they have varied and why the variation is significant. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 22.3. Through voluntary communications such as CSR reports? (If so, please attach your latest publication(s).) NA Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 1.4. Do you provide incentives for the management of climate change issues, including the attainment of greenhouse gas (GHG) targets? NA Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 7.7. Explain why you do not consider your company to be presented with significant opportunities - current and/or anticipated. NA At this time, we are unable to identify any specific physical opportunities that rise to a level that would enable additional commercial action - or even consideration among alternatives. While the breadth of our operations might provide an advantage ove NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 7.8. Please explain why not. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 1.1b. Select the lower level department responsible. NA Officer/manager reporting directly to board committee/board member NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 2.1. Describe your company’s process for identifying significant risks and/or opportunities from climate change and assessing the degree to which they could affect your business, including the financial implications. NA Walmart’s process for identifying risks or opportunities is to continuously gather information from as broad a variety of sources as possible including: Home Office and field associates, industry contacts, consulting firms, government organizations and NG NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 20.1A Index NA 44 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 6.5. Please describe them. NA As an example, we had a goal to sell 100 million compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFLs) at Walmart and Sam’s Club locations by the end of 2007. We exceeded this goal and sold 137 million CFLs in the original timeframe we had established to sell 100 milli NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 4.2B. What are the current and/or anticipated significant physical risks, and their associated countries/regions and timescales? NA There are potential impacts from climate change that could present significant risks to Walmart. A partial list of some of these physical risks include: • Increased frequency and duration of storms • Sea level rise • Flooding • Temperature change • NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 4.8. Please explain why not. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 0. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 8. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2010/02/20402/Investor CDP 2010/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2010/RisksOpportunities-OtherOpportunities/Sustainable Product Index Fact Sheet.pdf NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 6.6. Describe any actions the company has taken or plans to take to exploit the opportunities that have been identified, including the investment needed to take those actions. NA Walmart established the following goals for product efficiencies: REGION: U.S. GOAL: Double the sale of products in the U.S. that help make homes more energy efficient by 2011 (2008 Baseline). PROGRESS: Products falling under this category include caulk, NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 6.7. Explain why you do not consider your company to be presented with significant opportunities - current and/or anticipated. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 6.8. Please explain why not. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 7. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 7.1. Do current and/or anticipated physical impacts of climate change present significant opportunities for your company? NA No NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 7.2B. What are the current and/or anticipated significant physical opportunities and their associated countries/regions and timescales? NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 7.3. Describe the ways in which the identified opportunities affect or could affect your business and your value chain. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 7.4. Are there financial implications associated with the identified opportunities? NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 22.1. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change/GHG emissions in other places than in your CDP response? NA Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 22.2. In your Annual Reports or other mainstream filing? (If so, please attach your latest publication(s).) NA Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 3.1. Do current and/or anticipated regulatory requirements related to climate change present significant risks to your company? NA Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 3.2B. What are the current and/or anticipated significant regulatory risks related to climate change and their associated countries/regions and timescales? NA Yes, both current and anticipated regulatory requirements related to climate change present significant risks to Walmart. Current and/or anticipated regulatory risks in the U.S. include cap-and-trade legislation currently under consideration, mandatory NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 3.3. Describe the ways in which the identified risks affect or could affect your business and your value chain. NA The primary means through which these regulatory risks could affect our business and value chain involve increased costs and process changes as more fully described in the paragraph below: NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 6.1. Do current and/or anticipated regulatory requirements related to climate change present significant opportunities for your company? NA Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 6.2B. What are the current and/or anticipated significant regulatory opportunities and their associated countries/regions and timescales? NA If legislation is passed in the U.S., it is likely that utilities will pass through to their customers any costs incurred to get below mandated emissions cap levels. These increased utility costs will create further incentives to reduce energy use - both NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 6.3. Describe the ways in which the identified opportunities affect or could affect your business and your value chain. NA A carbon premium could alter consumer purchasing habits and spur innovative low carbon product development. This could change the products our customers choose to purchase, how we serve our customers, what we are able to offer them, and the way our suppl NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 7. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 16.2. Please provide details including the anticipated timescale over which the emissions are avoided, in which sector of the economy they might help to avoid emissions and their potential to avoid emissions. NA For the goods we sell, the anticipated timescale of avoided emissions from those products last over the life of the product. It is the consumer sector in which these products will have an impact. The potential to help avoid emissions range from a few pe NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 17.1. Please provide your total carbon dioxide emissions in metric tonnes CO2 from the combustion of biologically sequestered carbon i.e. carbon dioxide emissions from burning biomass/biofuels. NA 743 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 17.2. Please explain why not. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 19. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2010/02/20402/Investor CDP 2010/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2010/Emissions-Other2/WMT-20100330-10K-20100131.pdf NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 19. Further Information NA Verification necessarily lags the current reporting year by a year. The attached verification report is for calendar years 2005 - 2008. From last years CICS Verification Report: "Final Verified Data / Verification Opinion Based on the Tier II verificati NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 8.1. Does climate change present other significant opportunities - current and/or anticipated - for your company? NA Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 8.2B. What are the current and/or anticipated other significant opportunities and their associated countries/regions and timescales? NA Beyond opportunities managing our own footprint, many of our opportunities will come through managing the carbon and energy costs associated with our supply chain and those of our customers. Pursuing these initiatives is in keeping with our mission of sa NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 8.3. Describe the ways in which the identified opportunities affect or could affect your business and your value chain. NA The Supply Chain GHG Innovation Program is expected to remove GHG, energy, and inefficiencies from the raw material sourcing, manufacture, transportation, use, and disposal of products resulting in lower life cycle costs to our customers. The Index is ex NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 8.4. Are there financial implications associated with the identified opportunities? NA Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 8.5. Please describe them. NA For the Supply Chain GHG Innovation Program - if this reduction were to come solely from electricity efficiencies and the avoided electricity costs were $0.10/kWh, the financial implications of these cost savings would be in excess of $2.5 billion. There NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 8.6. Describe any actions the company has taken or plans to take to exploit the opportunities that have been identified, including the investment needed to take those actions. NA For the Supply Chain GHG Innovation Program – Walmart has assembled a team of internal and external experts. We have identified likely high carbon product lines that should yield above average reductions by concentrating our efforts in these areas and wo NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 21.1. Do you participate in any emission trading schemes? No, we don't participate nor do we currently anticipate participating in any emissions trading scheme within the next two years. We don't currently, but anticipate participating in emissions trading within the next two years. Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 21.3. What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? NA Although not currently trading under the schemes, in April 2010, Walmart divisions in the UK and in Japan, came under the requirements of two different emission trading schemes. The UK trading scheme is the Carbon Reduction Commitment (CRC), a new carbon NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 4.4. Are there financial implications associated with the identified risks? NA Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 4.5. Please describe them. NA In the future, there could be localized effects from the events described above that could curtail operations, hamper supply chain, cause supply shortages or prevent customers from accessing our stores, all of which could result in sales decreases or cost NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data Risks&Opps 4 Index NA 44 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data Risks&Opps 5 Index NA 44 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data Risks&Opps 6 Index NA 44 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data Risks&Opps 7 Index NA 44 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data Risks&Opps 8 Index NA 44 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data Strategy 9 (2) Index NA 44 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data Strategy 9 (3) Index NA 44 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data Strategy 9 Index NA 44 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 14.2. You may report a total contractual Scope 2 figure in response to this question. Please provide your total global contractual Scope 2 GHG emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2-e. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 22. Further Information NA Sustainable Product Index press release: http://walmartstores.com/pressroom/news/9277.aspx NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 0.4. Modules - As part of the Investor CDP information request, electric utilities, companies with electric utility activities or assets, companies in the automobile or auto component manufacture sectors and companies in the oil and gas industry should co NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 1. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2010/02/20402/Investor CDP 2010/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2010/Governance/SVN Graphic.JPG NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 1. Further Information NA There are incentives in the form of recognition and career advancement opportunities that are used to reward superior performance on GHG and other sustainability initiatives. As an example, several members of the Sustainable Value Networks were awarded o NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 3. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2010/02/20402/Investor CDP 2010/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2010/RisksOpportunities-RegulatoryRisks/WMT 2010 GHG Goals and Progress.doc NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 3. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 2. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 7.5. Please describe them. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 7.6. Describe any actions the company has taken or plans to take to exploit the opportunities that have been identified, including the investment needed to take those actions. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 5. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 5. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 5.1. Does climate change present other significant risks - current and/or anticipated - for your company? NA No NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 1.2. What is the mechanism by which the board committee or other executive body reviews the company’s progress and status regarding climate change? NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 1.3a. Please explain how overall responsibility for climate change is managed within your company. NA Walmart developed 13 Sustainable Value Networks (SVNs) that integrate sustainable practices into every aspect of our business. The SVNs responsible for meeting climate-related goals are: the Greenhouse Gas Network, the Sustainable Buildings Network, the NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 1.3b. Please explain how overall responsibility for climate change is managed within your company. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 6. Attachments NA https://webadmin.cdproject.net/Sites/2010/02/20402/Investor CDP 2010/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2010/RisksOpportunities-RegulatoryOpportunities/WMT 2010 GHG Goals and Progress.doc NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 21.4. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? No No Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 9.5. Please explain if you intend to set a new target. (If you have had a target and the date for completing it fell within your reporting year, please answer questions 9.5 and 9.6) NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 4. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 4. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 4.1. Do current and/or anticipated physical impacts of climate change present significant risks to your company? NA Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 3.4. Are there financial implications associated with the identified risks? NA Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 3.5. Please describe them. NA Yes, there are financial implications to our business associated with the identified risks. They include: increased utility expenses due to the implementation of cap-and-trade along with increased motor fuel prices based on the cost of emissions allowanc NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 3.6. Describe any actions the company has taken or plans to take to manage or adapt to the risks that have been identified, including the cost of those actions. NA We have been actively engaged in reducing our carbon footprint since 2005. Reducing our footprint will limit our exposure to cost increases from regulatory risk. We are also working with our suppliers and customers to help them do the same. Our climate NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 3.7. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to significant regulatory risks - current and/or anticipated. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 3.8. Please explain why not. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 5.3. Describe the ways in which the identified risks affect or could affect your business and your value chain. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 5.4. Are there financial implications associated with the identified risks? NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 5.5. Please describe them. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 5.6. Describe any actions the company has taken or plans to take to manage or adapt to the other risks that have been identified, including the costs of those actions. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 5.2B. What are the current and/or anticipated other significant risks, and their associated countries/regions and timescales? NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 9.4. Please give details of the target(s) you are developing and when you expect to announce it/them. (If you are in the process of developing a target) NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 20.1A. Please complete the following table indicating the percentage of reported emissions that have been verified/assured and attach the relevant statement. 20.1.C1. Scope 1 (Q12.1) NA More than 80% but less than or equal to 100% NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 20.1B. I have attached an external verification statement that covers the following scopes: NA Scope 1; Scope 2 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 20.1C2. Scope 2 (Q13.1) NA More than 80% but less than or equal to 100% NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 20.1C3. Scope 3 (Q15.1) NA Not verified NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 21. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data Governance Index NA 44 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data Risks&Opps 2 Index NA 44 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data Risks&Opps 3 Index NA 44 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 0. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 0.1. Introduction - Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. NA Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (NYSE: WMT), or “Walmart,” serves customers and members more than 200 million times per week at more than 8,400 retail units under 55 different banners in 15 countries. Walmart was built on the foundation of saving people money so t NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 0.3. Are you participating in the Walmart Sustainability Assessment? No Yes Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 14.1. Do you consider that the grid average factors used to report Scope 2 emissions in question 13 reflect the contractual arrangements you have with electricity suppliers? NA Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 2. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 1.1a . Please specify who is responsible. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data Emissions 18 Index NA 44 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data Emissions 21 Index NA 44 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 9.3. Please explain why not and forecast how your Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions will change over the next 5 years. (If you do not have a target) NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 9.9. Please provide any other information you consider necessary to describe your emission reduction activities. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 9.a Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2010/02/20402/Investor CDP 2010/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2010/Strategy-Targets/WMT 2010 GHG Goals and Progress.doc NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 9.a Further Information NA Walmart has numerous aggressive GHG reduction and energy efficiency goals, few of which provide meaningful information or comparisons when forced into the format provided. For a complete listing of GHG/efficiency goals and progress, please see the attach NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 9.b Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2010/02/20402/Investor CDP 2010/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2010/Strategy-EmissionReductionActivities/WMT 2010 GHG Goals and Progress.doc NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 9.b Further Information NA Walmart has undertaken literally thousands of efficiency projects and initiatives in our domestic and international operations, as well as in our supply chain. These projects affect electricity, natural gas, refrigerant and transportation fuel usages. W NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data Comms Index NA 44 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data Emissions 14 Index NA 44 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 21. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 6.4. Are there financial implications associated with the identified opportunities? NA Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 9. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 9. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 9.1. Please describe how your overall group business strategy links with actions taken on risks and opportunities (identified in questions 3 to 8), including any emissions reduction targets or achievements, public policy engagement and external communicat NA Sustainability is inextricably embedded within our overall business strategy and carbon reduction is a key element of our sustainability program. Our overarching goals to: • Be supplied 100 percent by renewable energy; • Create zero waste; and • Sell pr NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 9.10. Do you engage with policy makers on possible responses to climate change including taxation, regulation and carbon trading? NA Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 9.11. Please describe. NA Walmart engages with policymakers at all levels on climate change with testimony before Congress, conversations with government officials and NGOs, as well as numerous public statements. Our goal is to act as a partner with government, providing a lens i NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 9.2. Do you have a current emissions reduction target? NA Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 14.3. Explain the origin of the alternative figure including information about the emission factors used and the tariffs. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 14.4. Has your organization retired any certificates, e.g. Renewable Energy Certificates, associated with zero or low carbon electricity within the reporting year or has this been done on your behalf? NA No NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 16. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 16. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 16.1. Does the use of your goods and/or services enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party? NA Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 8.7. Explain why you do not consider your company to be presented with significant opportunities - current and/or anticipated. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 8.8. Please explain why not. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 1.1. Where is the highest level of responsibility for climate change within your company? There is no individual or committee with overall responsibility for climate change Other, lower level departments Board committee or other executive body
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 14. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 22. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2010/02/20402/Investor CDP 2010/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2010/Communications/2010_Annual_Report.pdf NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 6. Further Information NA GHG/Energy Goals Progress Update REGION: Global GOAL: Design and open a viable store prototype that is 25 to 30 percent more efficient and will produce up to 30 percent fewer greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 2009 globally (2005 Baseline). PROGRESS: In 2 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 8. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 4.3. Describe the ways in which the identified risks affect or could affect your business and your value chain. NA Some of the ways the identified risks could affect our business, value chain, and customers include: increased personal safety hazards, increased personal health issues for customers and associates, property damage, operational hazards, operations disrupt NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 4.7. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to significant physical risks - current and/or anticipated. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 5.7. Explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to other significant risks - current and/or anticipated. NA In addition to regulatory and physical risks, we have the general risk of resource availability constraints, caused by climate change, which could pressure the industry's supply chain in the forms of raw materials scarcity, diminished manufacturing capaci NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 5.8. Please explain why not. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data Emissions 16 Index NA 44 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 14. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 4.6. Describe any actions the company has taken or plans to take to manage or adapt to the risks that have been identified, including the cost of those actions. NA While we constantly monitor our facilities in real time, at this time, we are currently unable to identify any specific physical risks that rise to a level that would enable commercial action. Although the company has no specific process for identifying NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data Click here to see the 48 items available from this source
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 5.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure No Response
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 5.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure No Response
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 5.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure No Response
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 13.1a If absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) have increased, decreased or remained the same overall compared to the previous year, state direction of change Slightly Increased
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 5.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; (iii) the costs associated with these actions Answered
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 8.6. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 1 emissions NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data Management 4. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? 5
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 11.1. Do you consider that the grid average factors used to report Scope 2 emissions in Question 8.3 reflect the contractual arrangements you have with electricity suppliers? No
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 6.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions Answered
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 3.1. Did you have an emissions reduction target that was active (ongoing or reached completion) in the reporting year? Absolute and intensity targets
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 3.1e. Please explain (i) why not; and (ii) forecast how your emissions will change over the next five years No Response
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 3.2. Does the use of your goods and/or services directly enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party? Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 3.2a. Please provide details (see guidance) Answered
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 11.2. Has your organization retired any certificates, e.g. Renewable Energy Certificates, associated with zero or low carbon electricity within the reporting year or has this been done on your behalf? Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 14.1. Do you participate in any emission trading schemes? No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next two years
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 3.3c. If you do not have any emissions reduction initiatives, please explain why not No Response
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 8.4. Are there are any sources (e.g. facilities, specific GHGs, activities, geographies, etc.) of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions which are not included in your disclosure? No
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 3.3b. What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities? Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities. 7
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 8.7. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 2 emissions NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 5.1. Have you identified any climate change risks (current or future) that have potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 6.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure No Response
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 6.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure No Response
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 5.1a. Climate change risks driven by changes in regulation Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 6.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions Answered
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 2.3. Do you engage with policy makers to encourage further action on mitigation and/or adaptation? Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 2.3a. Please explain (i) the engagement process and (ii) actions you are advocating Answered
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 13.1. How do your absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year compare to the previous year? Increased
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 6.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure No Response
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data Carbon disclosure score 0 85 100 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data Carbon performance band E B A NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 11.1a. You may report a total contractual Scope 2 figure in response to this question. Please provide your total global contractual Scope 2 GHG emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e Answered
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 11.1b. Explain the basis of the alternative figure (see guidance) Answered
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 2.1a. Please provide further details (see guidance) Answered
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 2.2. Is climate change integrated into your business strategy? Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes (see guidance) Answered
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 2.2b. Please explain why not No Response
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 6.1a. Please describe your opportunities that are driven by changes in regulation Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 1.1. Where is the highest level of direct responsibility for climate change within your company? Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 5.1c. Climate change risks driven by change in physical climate parameters Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 5.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions Answered
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 1.2. Do you provide incentives for the management of climate change issues, including the attainment of targets? Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 14.1b. What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? No Response
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 6.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions Answered
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 2.1. Please select the option that best describes your risk management procedures with regard to climate change risks and opportunities Integrated into multi-disciplinary company wide risk management processes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 3.3. Did you have emissions reduction initiatives that were active within the reporting year (this can include those in the planning and/or implementation phases) Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 14.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? No
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 5.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions Answered
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data Click here to see the 90 items available from this source
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 5.1e Identified climate change risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments? NA Yes NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 5.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA ID 1: (i) Consumer changes in the products they select could affect demand for goods and services. Because this is a long-term risk with unpredictable implications from climate change, we have not yet measured the potential effect as it relates specifical NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 5.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 5.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 5.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 6. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/02/20402/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/6.ClimateChangeOpportunities/Cold Water Wash Substantiation.docx NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 7.1. Please provide your base year and base year emissions (Scopes 1 and 2) NA NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 11.1b. Explain the basis of the alternative figure (see guidance) In the United States, we have retained Renewable Energy Credits associated with purchased renewable electricity. In Mexico, we have retained Certified Emissions Reductions associated with purchased renewable electricity. In our gross emission calculations NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 5.1c Identified climate change risks driven by change in physical climate parameters? NA Yes NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 3.1. Did you have an emissions reduction target that was active (ongoing or reached completion) in the reporting year? No Absolute and intensity targets Absolute and intensity targets NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 2.2b. Please explain why not NA NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 8.6. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 1 emissions More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% NA More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 1.1a. Please identify the position of the individual or name of the committee with this responsibility No Response Approved and announced in October 2010, as stated in our 2011 annual report, the Walmart Board of Directors changed its charter to formalize the Compensation, Nominating, and Governance Committee of the Board’s oversight for sustainability and corporate r Answered NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply No Opportunities driven by changes in regulation; Opportunities driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 8.2. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e for 2010 - 01 Jul 2010 - 30 Jun 2011 reporting period 0 5870771 137184240 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 8.2. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e for 2011 - 01 Jul 2011 - 30 Jun 2012 reporting period 0 5804559 231902967 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 6.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA ID 1: (i) While it is difficult to correlate Walmart’s emphasis on climate change mitigation with a specific portion of our brand value, we believe strongly that we owe it to our customers, suppliers, associates, and communities to lead the way on reducin NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 2.3a. Please explain (i) the engagement process and (ii) actions you are advocating NA Method of engagement: Walmart has engaged with policymakers at all levels on climate change with testimony before U.S. Congress, conversations with government officials, collaborations with government entities and NGOs, as well as numerous public statemen NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 14.1. Do you participate in any emission trading schemes? No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next two years No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next two years Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 14.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? No No Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 2.1. Please select the option that best describes your risk management procedures with regard to climate change risks and opportunities There are no documented processes for assessing and managing risks and opportunities from climate change Integrated into multi-disciplinary company wide risk management processes Integrated into multi-disciplinary company wide risk management processes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 2.1a. Please provide further details (see guidance) NA Process Scope: Walmart evaluates climate change risks and opportunities company-wide and at the market and asset level. A wide variety of risks and opportunities are evaluated by different groups depending on the scope of their impact, such as general re NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 2.2. Is climate change integrated into your business strategy? No Yes Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes (see guidance) NA Walmart’s Sustainability 360 process takes a comprehensive view of our business by engaging more than 100,000 suppliers, 2.2 million associates, and hundreds of millions of customers around the world in our efforts. Sustainability 360 lives in every corne NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 0.4. Currency selection Please select the currency in which you would like to submit your response. All financial information contained in the response should be in this currency. NA USD($) NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 1. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/02/20402/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/1.Governance/WalmartFY2012 Annual Report.pdf NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 1. Further Information NA 2011 Annual Report, pg. 13. Letter from Rob Walton, Chairman of the Board describing the Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee's oversight of sustainability initiatives: http://walmartstores.com/sites/annualreport/2011/financials/Walmart_2011 NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 13.1a (ii) If absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) have increased, decreased or remained the same overall compared to the previous year, state the reason for the direction of change NA Decrease: Change in output, Increase: Emissions reduction activities, Increase: Acquisitions, Decrease: Acquisitions, Increase: Divestment, Decrease: Change in output NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 5.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA ID 1: (i) State or regional legislation related to cap-and-trade schemes potentially have financial implications for Walmart, similar to those that would be possible under a national cap-and-trade scheme (which now appears unlikely). Increased utility ex NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 8.8a. Please provide the emissions in metric tonnes CO2e 0 12825 27263000 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 1.2. Do you provide incentives for the management of climate change issues, including the attainment of targets? No Yes Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 11. Attachments NA NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 11. Further Information NA NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data Management 4. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/02/20402/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/4.Communication/Walmart FY2012 Global Responsibility Report.pdf NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data Management 4. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? NA 4 NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 3. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/02/20402/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/3.TargetsandInitiatives/Walmart FY2012 Global Responsibility Report.pdf NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 3. Further Information NA Low carbon energy purchase: Savings from solar in the U.S. is minimal, if any - cost neutral to traditional power. Transportation fleet & Transportation use: Through both the equipment and operational initiatives, we saved $75 million in costs in fisc NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 6.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA ID 1 & 2: (i) The financial implications of increased temperature and precipitation are likely to be negative, as documented in the Risks section of this document; however, those effects could be slightly offset by increased crop yield in some regions and NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 5.1. Have you identified any climate change risks (current or future) that have potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply No Risks driven by changes in regulation; Risks driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 5.1a Identified risks driven by changes in regulation? NA NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 3.3c Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities. 0 7 12 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 3.3c. What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities? NA Compliance with regulatory requirements/standards, Dedicated budget for energy efficiency, Dedicated budget for low carbon product R&D, Employee engagement, Employee engagement, Financial optimization calculations, Internal finance mechanisms NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 5. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/02/20402/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/5.ClimateChangeRisks/ar4_syr.pdf NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 5. Further Information NA Further InformationThe Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is the leading international body for the assessment of climate change. It was established by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the World Meteorological Organization NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 3.2. Does the use of your goods and/or services directly enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party? No Yes Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 3.2a. Please provide details (see guidance) NA Our Supplier Energy Efficiency Program has acted as a service to participating suppliers to help them reduce energy in their operations by installing more energy efficient equipment and controls. Since the program began in 2007, it has removed approximat NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 13.1a (i) If absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) have increased, decreased or remained the same overall compared to the previous year, state direction of change Significant Increase Slightly Increased Significant Decrease NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 8.3. Please provide your gross global Scope 2 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e for 2010 - 01 Jul 2010 - 30 Jun 2011 reporting period 0 5870771 137184240 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 8.3. Please provide your gross global Scope 2 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e for 2011 - 01 Jul 2011 - 30 Jun 2012 reporting period 0 5804559 231902967 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 8.7. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 2 emissions More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% NA More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 8.3. Please provide your gross global Scope 2 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e for 2009 - 01 Jul 2009 - 30 Jun 2010 reporting period 0 5967127 35559440 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 0. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/02/20402/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/Introduction/WalmartFY2012 Annual Report.pdf NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 0. Further Information NA Question 1 sources are http://investors.walmartstores.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=112761&p=irol-irhome and http://www.walmartstores.com/pressroom/news/10821.aspx. These include the most recent store counts, employee figures and FY12 sales figures as of May 16, 20 NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 0.1. Introduction - Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. NA Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (NYSE: WMT), or “Walmart,” serves customers and members more than 200 million times per week at 10,130 retail units under 69 different banners in 27 countries, supported by distribution, logistics, and sourcing operations in these 27 NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 13. Further Information NA NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 2012 Performance Band E B A NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 6.1a Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in regulation? NA Yes NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 6.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 8.2. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e for 2009 - 01 Jul 2009 - 30 Jun 2010 reporting period 0 5967127 35559440 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 8.1. Please select the boundary you are using for your Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas inventory NA NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 8.4. Are there are any sources (e.g. facilities, specific GHGs, activities, geographies, etc.) of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions which are not included in your disclosure? No No Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 14. Attachments NA NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 3.1e. Please explain (i) why not; and (ii) forecast how your emissions will change over the next five years NA NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 6.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA ID 1: (i) The specific financial implications of an international agreement on climate change depend greatly on the structure (taxation versus cap-and-trade schemes) and scope (which industries are regulated) of the agreement and the way it is carried out NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 6.1c Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in physical climate parameters? NA Yes NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 7. Further Information NA NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 2. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/02/20402/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/2.Strategy/SVN Structure 2012.JPG NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 2. Further Information NA Walmart operates multiple Sustainable Value Networks (SVNs) that integrate sustainable practices into our business. In 2011, we restructured the network structure to better fit and support our progress. Our nine SVNs are overseen by a pair of councils, ch NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 1.1. Where is the highest level of direct responsibility for climate change within your company? No individual or committee with overall responsibility for climate change Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 14.1b. What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 5.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA ID 1: (i) The extent and nature of potential effects from a change in global mean temperature are uncertain, but they could range from increased energy usage or cost in our operations to increased costs for our suppliers and customers. At this time, we ha NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 14. Further Information NA NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 2.3. Do you engage with policy makers to encourage further action on mitigation and/or adaptation? No Yes Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 13.1a (iii) If emissions have increased, decreased or remained the same overall, provide the emissions value (%) NA Decrease: , Increase: 5.7 , Emission value for which direction is not stated: NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 8.8. Are carbon dioxide emissions from the combustion of biologically sequestered carbon (i.e. carbon dioxide emissions from burning biomass/biofuels) relevant to your company? No Yes Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 6.1e Identified opportunities that are driven by changes in other climate-related developments? NA Yes NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 2012 Score 0 86 100 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 6.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 13.1. How do your absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year compare to the previous year? Increased Increased Decreased NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 11.2. Has your organization retired any certificates, e.g. Renewable Energy Certificates, associated with zero or low carbon electricity within the reporting year or has this been done on your behalf? No Response Yes Answered NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data End of Scope 1 Reporting Period 12/31/2011 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data End of Scope 2 Reporting Period 12/31/2011 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data Reported gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e for 2013 reporting period? Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data Reported gross global Scope 2 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e for 2013 reporting period? Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 6. Further Information NA The BrandZ 2012 report on the world’s most valuable brands is available here: http://www.millwardbrown.com/BrandZ/Top_100_Global_Brands.aspx NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 13. Attachments NA NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 6.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 7. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/02/20402/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/7.EmissionsMethodology/Emission Factors_2012 CDP Response_Walmart.xlsx NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 11.1. Do you consider that the grid average factors used to report Scope 2 emissions in Question 8.3 reflect the contractual arrangements you have with electricity suppliers? No No Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 11.1a. You may report a total contractual Scope 2 figure in response to this question. Please provide your total global contractual Scope 2 GHG emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 0 15199767 17902000 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data Click here to see the 82 items available from this source
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 12. Attachments NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 12. Further Information NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 12.1. How do your absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year compare to the previous year? Increased
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 12.1a Reason of change Emissions reduction activities, Divestment, Acquisitions, Mergers, Change in output, Change in methodology, Change in boundary, Change in physical operating conditions, Unidentified, Other
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 2.2. Is climate change integrated into your business strategy? No Yes Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 5.1c. Climate change risks driven by change in physical climate parameters Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 5.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA ID1 (i) The extent and nature of potential effects from a change in global mean temperature are uncertain, but they could range from increased energy usage or cost in our operations to increased costs for our suppliers and customers. At this time, we have NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 5.1e.Climate change risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 5.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA ID1 (i) Consumer changes in the products they select could affect demand for goods and services. Because this is a long-term risk with unpredictable implications from climate change, we have not yet measured the potential effect as it relates specifically NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 5.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 6. Attachments NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 6. Further Information NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Opportunities driven by changes in regulation; Opportunities driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? -Transparency Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 6.1a Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in regulation? No Response Yes Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 6.1c. Please describe the opportunities that are driven by changes in physical climate parameters Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 6.1e. Please describe the opportunities that are driven by changes in other climate-related developments Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 6.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA ID1 (i) While it is difficult to correlate Walmart’s emphasis on climate change mitigation with a specific portion of our brand value, we believe strongly that we owe it to our customers, suppliers, associates, and communities to lead the way on reducing NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 6.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 2.1a. Please provide further details (see guidance) NA Process Scope: Walmart evaluates climate change risks and opportunities company-wide as well as at the market and asset level. A wide variety of risks and opportunities are evaluated by different groups depending on the scope of their impact, such as gen NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 2013 Performance Band E A- A NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 2013 Score 0 94 100 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 8.3. Please provide your gross global Scope 2 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e for 2010 - 01 Jul 2010 - 30 Jun 2011 reporting period 0 0 34559597 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 8.3. Please provide your gross global Scope 2 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e for 2011 - 01 Jul 2011 - 30 Jun 2012 reporting period 0 0 133428139 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 3.1. Did you have an emissions reduction target that was active (ongoing or reached completion) in the reporting year? No Absolute and intensity targets Absolute and intensity targets
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 8.4. Are there are any sources (e.g. facilities, specific GHGs, activities, geographies, etc.) of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions which are not included in your disclosure? No Response Yes Yes Proportion of Scope 1 emissions that are verified/assured for 2011 - 2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 14.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? No No Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 4.1. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? 4 The number of corporate annual reports and voluntary publications (complete and/or underway) made about the company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 5. Attachments NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 5. Further Information NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 5.1. Have you identified any climate change risks (current or future) that have potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Risks driven by changes in regulation; Risks driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 5.1a. Climate change risks driven by changes in regulation Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 1.1. Where is the highest level of direct responsibility for climate change within your company? No individual or committee with overall responsibility for climate change Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 1.2. Do you provide incentives for the management of climate change issues, including the attainment of targets? No Yes Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 6.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 11.1. What percentage of your total operational spend in the reporting year was on energy? More than 0% but less than or equal to 5% More than 0% but less than or equal to 5% More than 95% but less than or equal to 100%
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 2.1. Please select the option that best describes your risk management procedures with regard to climate change risks and opportunities No Response Integrated into multi-disciplinary company wide risk management processes Integrated into multi-disciplinary company wide risk management processes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 3.3c Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities. 0 8 13 Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities.
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 2.3d. Do you publically disclose a list of all the research organizations that you fund? Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 2.3a. Please explain (i) the engagement process and (ii) actions you are advocating NA We promoted energy efficiency and other GHG reduction activities through regulatory policy dockets, public speaking, and legislative activity in 2012. Walmart regularly participates in state utility commission-ordered working groups that submit suggestio NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 2.3b. Are you on the Board of any trade associations or provide funding beyond membership? Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 7. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/sites/2013/02/20402/Investor CDP 2013/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2013/7.EmissionsMethodology/Walmart 2012 Emission Factors.xls NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 7. Further Information NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 8.3. Please provide your gross global Scope 2 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e for 2012 - 01 Jul 2012 - 30 Jun 2013 reporting period 0 5605099 256800000 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 0.6. Modules NA As part of the Investor CDP information request, electric utilities, companies with electric utility activities or assets, companies in the automobile or auto component manufacture sectors and companies in the oil and gas industry should complete suppleme
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 1. Attachments NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes (see guidance) NA Walmart’s Sustainability 360 process takes a comprehensive view of our business by engaging more than 100,000 suppliers, 2.2 million associates, and hundreds of millions of customers around the world in our efforts. Sustainability 360 lives in every corne NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 2.2b. Please explain why not NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 14. Attachments NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 14. Further Information NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 14.1. Do you participate in any emission trading schemes? No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next two years No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next 2 years Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 14.1b. What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data End of Scope 1 Reporting Period 12-31-2012 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data End of Scope 2 Reporting Period 12-31-2012 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 8.8a. Please provide the emissions in metric tonnes CO2e 0 438 13638000
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 3. Further Information NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 2.3. Do you engage in activities that could either directly or indirectly influence policy on climate change through any of the following? (tick all that apply) Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 2. Attachments NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 2. Further Information NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 3. Attachments NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 8.8. Are carbon dioxide emissions from biologically sequestered carbon relevant to your organization? Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 3.1e. Please explain (i) why not; and (ii) forecast how your emissions will change over the next five years NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 3.2. Does the use of your goods and/or services directly enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party? No Yes Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 3.2a. Please provide details (see guidance) NA Selling Products that Help Customers Avoid Emissions: Select products sold in our stores globally have allowed our retail customers to reduce their energy use and the resulting greenhouse gases. We have been able to quantify results from a few of these NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 8.2. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e for 2010 - 01 Jul 2010 - 30 Jun 2011 reporting period 0 0 34559597 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 8.2. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e for 2011 - 01 Jul 2011 - 30 Jun 2012 reporting period 0 0 133428139 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 8.2. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e for 2012 - 01 Jul 2012 - 30 Jun 2013 reporting period 0 5605099 256800000 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 0.4. Currency selection Please select the currency in which you would like to submit your response. All financial information contained in the response should be in this currency. USD($)
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 6.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 0. Attachments NA NA NA If you have not been presented with a sector module that you consider would be appropriate for your company to answer, please select the module below. If you wish to view the questions first, please see https://www.cdproject.net/en-US/Programmes/Pages/Mor
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 0. Further Information NA NA NA If you are in these sectors (according to the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS)), the corresponding sector modules will be marked as default options to your information request. If you want to query your classification, please email respond@c
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 0.1. Introduction - Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. NA Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (NYSE: WMT), or “Walmart,” serves customers and members more than 200 million times per week at 10,700 retail units under 69 different banners in 27 countries, supported by distribution, logistics, and sourcing operations in these 27 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 11. Attachments NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 11. Further Information NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 1. Further Information NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 3.3c. What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities? NA Compliance with regulatory requirements/standards, Dedicated budget for energy efficiency, Dedicated budget for low carbon product R&D, Employee engagement, Employee engagement, Financial optimization calculations, Internal finance mechanisms, Partnering NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 4. Attachments NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 4. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? - Further Information NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 5.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 5.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data Reported gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e for 2013 reporting period? Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data Reported gross global Scope 2 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e for 2013 reporting period? Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data Click here to see the 82 items available from this source
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 1.1a. Please identify the position of the individual or name of the committee with this responsibility Approved and announced in October 2010, as stated in our 2011 annual report, the Walmart Board of Directors changed its charter to formalize the Compensation, Nominating, and Governance Committee of the Board’s oversight for sustainability and corporate r NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 11. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 11. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 11.1. What percentage of your total operational spend in the reporting year was on energy? More than 0% but less than or equal to 5% NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 12. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 12. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 12.1. How do your absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year compare to the previous year? Increased NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 12.1a Reason of change Emissions reduction activities, Divestment, Acquisitions, Mergers, Change in output, Change in methodology, Change in boundary, Change in physical operating conditions, Unidentified, Other NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 12.2. % change from previous year 1 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 5.1. Have you identified any climate change risks (current or future) that have potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? -transparency Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 0.4. Currency selection Please select the currency in which you would like to submit your response. All financial information contained in the response should be in this currency. USD($) NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 2. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 2. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 0. Attachments NA If you have not been presented with a sector module that you consider would be appropriate for your company to answer, please select the module below. If you wish to view the questions first, please see https://www.cdproject.net/en-US/Programmes/Pages/Mor
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 0. Further Information NA If you are in these sectors (according to the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS)), the corresponding sector modules will be marked as default options to your information request. If you want to query your classification, please email respond@c
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 0.1. Introduction - Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (NYSE: WMT), or “Walmart,” serves customers and members more than 250 million times per week at 10,942 retail units under 69 different banners in 27 countries, supported by distribution, logistics, and sourcing operations. Walmart wa NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data Ticker WMT Ticker
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data Verification/ assurance 123 Audit and verification by a competent and independent organization that uses a standardized set of terms and methods.
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 1.1. Where is the highest level of direct responsibility for climate change within your company? Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 3.2a. Please provide details (see guidance) Selling Products that Help Customers Avoid Emissions: Select products sold in our stores globally have allowed our retail customers to reduce their energy use and the resulting greenhouse gases. We have been able to quantify results from a few of these p NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 5. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 6.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 7. Attachments https://www.cdp.net/sites/2014/02/20402/Investor CDP 2014/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2014/CC7.EmissionsMethodology/Emission Factors.xls NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 7. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 0.6. Modules NA As part of the Investor CDP information request, electric utilities, companies with electric utility activities or assets, companies in the automobile or auto component manufacture sectors and companies in the oil and gas industry should complete suppleme
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 1.2. Do you provide incentives for the management of climate change issues, including the attainment of targets? Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 3. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 3. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 3.1. Did you have an emissions reduction target that was active (ongoing or reached completion) in the reporting year? Absolute and intensity targets NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 8.9. Biogenically generated tonnes CO2e for 2013 - 01 Jul 2013 - 30 Jun 2014 reporting period 619 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply Opportunities driven by changes in regulation; Opportunities driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? -Transparency Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 5.1a. Climate change risks driven by changes in regulation Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 5.1c. Climate change risks driven by change in physical climate parameters Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 5.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 6. Attachments https://www.cdp.net/sites/2014/02/20402/Investor CDP 2014/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2014/CC6.ClimateChangeOpportunities/2013_BrandZ_Top100_Chart.pdf NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 1. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 1. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 6. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 2.3a. Please explain (i) the engagement process and (ii) actions you are advocating NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 2.3b. Are you on the Board of any trade associations or provide funding beyond membership? Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 8.4. Are there are any sources (e.g. facilities, specific GHGs, activities, geographies, etc.) of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions which are not included in your disclosure? Yes Proportion of Scope 1 emissions that are verified/assured for 2011 - 2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 5.1. Have you identified any climate change risks (current or future) that have potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Risks driven by changes in regulation; Risks driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 3.3c Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities. 8 Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities.
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 3.3c. What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities? Compliance with regulatory requirements/standards, Other, Internal incentives/recognition programs, Employee engagement, Dedicated budget for energy efficiency, Dedicated budget for other emissions reduction activities, Partnering with governments on tech NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 2.2b. Please explain why not NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 2.3. Do you engage in activities that could either directly or indirectly influence policy on climate change through any of the following? (tick all that apply) Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 3.1e. Please explain (i) why not; and (ii) forecast how your emissions will change over the next five years NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 3.2. Does the use of your goods and/or services directly enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party? Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 8.3. Please provide your gross global Scope 2 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e for 2013 - 01 Jul 2013 - 30 Jun 2014 reporting period 14933422 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 14. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 14. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 14.1. Do you participate in any emission trading schemes? No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next 2 years NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 14.1b. What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 2.1. Please select the option that best describes your risk management procedures with regard to climate change risks and opportunities Integrated into multi-disciplinary company wide risk management processes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data Comment ŒŽ Comment
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data CPLI leader No Yes Yes The Climate Performance Leadership Inde: A company must: (1)Make its response public and submit via CDP’s Online Response System (2) Attain a performance score greater than (3) Disclose gross global Scope 1 and Scope 2 figures (4) Score maximum performanc
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 8.2. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e for 2013 - 01 Jul 2013 - 30 Jun 2014 reporting period 6501715 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes (see guidance) Walmart’s Sustainability 360 process takes a comprehensive view of our business by engaging more than 100,000 suppliers, 2.2 million associates, and hundreds of millions of customers around the world in our efforts. Sustainability 360 lives in every corne NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 2014 Score 1 98 100 2014 Score
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data CDLI leader No Yes Yes The Climate Disclosure Leadership Index: A Company must: (1)   Make its response public and submit via CDP’s Online Response System (2) Achieve a score within the top 10% of the total regional sample population
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 4. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? - Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 4.1. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? 4 The number of corporate annual reports and voluntary publications (complete and/or underway) made about the company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 5. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 14.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? No NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 6.1a Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in regulation? Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data Reported gross global Scope 2 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e for 2013 reporting period? Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data End of Biogenically Generated Reporting Period 12-31-2013 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data End of Scope 1 Reporting Period 12-31-2013 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data End of Scope 2 Reporting Period 12-31-2013 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data Reported biogenically generated metric tonnes CO2e for 2013 reporting period? Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data Reported gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e for 2013 reporting period? Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 6.1c. Please describe the opportunities that are driven by changes in physical climate parameters Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 4. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 2.2. Is climate change integrated into your business strategy? Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 2013 score 94 A- 2013 score
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 2014 Performance Band E A A 2014 Performance Band
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data Scope 1 emissions 6501715 All greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions that are directly from sources that are owned or controlled by the reporting entity.
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data Scope 2 emissions 14933422 All indirect greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the consumption of purchased electricity, heat or steam. Indirect GHG emissions are a consequence of the activities of the reporting entity, but occur at sources owned or controlled by another entity.
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data Target(s) reported abs int Absolute/Intensive
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 8.9. Are carbon dioxide emissions from biologically sequestered carbon relevant to your organization? Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 2.3d. Do you publically disclose a list of all the research organizations that you fund? Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data Click here to see the 67 items available from this source
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 14.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? No NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 5.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 12.1. How do your absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year compare to the previous year? Increased NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 12.1a Reason of change Emissions reduction activities Change in output Change in boundary Change in physical operating conditions NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 2.2. Is climate change integrated into your business strategy? Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 14. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 14. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 14.1. Do you participate in any emission trading schemes? No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next 2 years NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 5.1c. Climate change risks driven by change in physical climate parameters Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 2. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 2. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 8.1. Please select the boundary you are using for your Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas inventory Operational control Boundary used for Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas inventory during 2011-2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 8.2. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 2349.52 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes (see guidance) Walmart’s Global Responsbilitystrategy is comprised of three core elements, Opportunity, Community and Sustainability. Our Sustainability strategy takes a comprehensive view of our business by engaging oursuppliers, ssociates, and customers around the w NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 2.2b. Please explain why not NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 6. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 6. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 0. Attachments NA If you have not been presented with a sector module that you consider would be appropriate for your company to answer, please select the module below. If you wish to view the questions first, please see https://www.cdproject.net/en-US/Programmes/Pages/Mor
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 0. Further Information NA If you are in these sectors (according to the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS)), the corresponding sector modules will be marked as default options to your information request. If you want to query your classification, please email respond@c
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 0.1. Introduction - Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (NYSE: WMT), or “Walmart,” serves customers and members close to 260 million times per weekin 11,453 retail units under 69 different banners in 27 countries and through our websites globally,. Walmart was built on the foundation of s NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 14.1b. What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply Opportunities driven by changes in regulation; Opportunities driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? -Transparency Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 6.1a Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in regulation? Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 8.3.a. Please provide your gross global Scope 2 emissions figures in metric tonnes CO2e 29428.55 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 8.4. Are there are any sources (e.g. facilities, specific GHGs, activities, geographies, etc.) of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions which are not included in your disclosure? No Proportion of Scope 1 emissions that are verified/assured for 2011 - 2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 8.6. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your reported Scope 1 emissions 100 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 2.3d. Do you publically disclose a list of all the research organizations that you fund? Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 2015 Disclosure score 96 2015 Score
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 2015 Performance band B 2015 Performance Band
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 3. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 3. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 3.1. Did you have an emissions reduction target that was active (ongoing or reached completion) in the reporting year? Absolute and intensity targets NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 3.1e. Please explain (i) why not; and (ii) forecast how your emissions will change over the next five years NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 3.2. Does the use of your goods and/or services directly enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party? Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 3.2a. Please provide details (see guidance) Selling Products that Help Customers Avoid Emissions: Select products sold in our stores globally have allowed our retail customers to reduce their energy use and the resulting greenhouse gases. We have been able to quantify results from a few of these p NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 3.3c Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities. 8 Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities.
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 6.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 7. Attachments https://www.cdp.net/sites/2015/02/20402/Climate Change 2015/Shared Documents/Attachments/ClimateChange2015/CC7.EmissionsMethodology/Walmart_Emission Factors_CDP 2015_CY2014 GHG Inventory.xlsx NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 12. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 6.1c. Please describe the opportunities that are driven by changes in physical climate parameters Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 2.1. Please select the option that best describes your risk management procedures with regard to climate change risks and opportunities Integrated into multi-disciplinary company wide risk management processes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 7. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 3.3c. What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities? Compliance with regulatory requirements/standards, Dedicated budget for energy efficiency, Dedicated budget for low carbon product R&D, Employee engagement, Employee engagement, Financial optimization calculations, Internal finance mechanisms, Partnering NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 4. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 4. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? - Further Information A pdf version of our 2013 Corporate Responsibility Report is attached. Please refer to page 39. NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 0.6. Modules NA As part of the Investor CDP information request, electric utilities, companies with electric utility activities or assets, companies in the automobile or auto component manufacture sectors and companies in the oil and gas industry should complete suppleme
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 1. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 1. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 1.1. Where is the highest level of direct responsibility for climate change within your company? Board or individual/sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 8.9. Are carbon dioxide emissions from biologically sequestered carbon relevant to your organization? Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 2.3. Do you engage in activities that could either directly or indirectly influence policy on climate change through any of the following? (tick all that apply) Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 2.3a. Please explain (i) the engagement process and (ii) actions you are advocating NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 2.3b. Are you on the Board of any trade associations or provide funding beyond membership? Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 0.4. Currency selection Please select the currency in which you would like to submit your response. All financial information contained in the response should be in this currency. USD($) NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 1.1a. Please identify the position of the individual or name of the committee with this responsibility Approved and announced in October 2010, as stated in our 2011 annual report, the Walmart Board of Directors changed its charter to formalize the Compensation, Nominating, and Governance Committee of the Board’s oversight for sustainability and corporate r NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 1.2. Do you provide incentives for the management of climate change issues, including the attainment of targets? Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 11. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 11. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 11.1. What percentage of your total operational spend in the reporting year was on energy? More than 0% but less than or equal to 5% NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 12. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 4.1. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? 3 The number of corporate annual reports and voluntary publications (complete and/or underway) made about the company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 5. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 5. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 5.1a. Climate change risks driven by changes in regulation Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 5.1. Have you identified any climate change risks (current or future) that have potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Risks driven by changes in regulation; Risks driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 5.1. Have you identified any climate change risks (current or future) that have potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? -transparency Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2016 Full Data Click here to see the 24 items available from this source
Carbon Disclosure Project 2016 Full Data 5.1. Have you identified any climate change risks (current or future) that have potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? -transparency Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2016 Full Data 6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? -Transparency Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2016 Full Data 8.1. Please select the boundary you are using for your Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas inventory Operational control Boundary used for Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas inventory during 2011-2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
Carbon Disclosure Project 2016 Full Data 8.2. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 6107244 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2016 Full Data 8.3.a. Please provide your gross global Scope 2 emissions figures in metric tonnes CO2e 14928054 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2016 Full Data 8.4. Are there are any sources (e.g. facilities, specific GHGs, activities, geographies, etc.) of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions which are not included in your disclosure? NA Proportion of Scope 1 emissions that are verified/assured for 2011 - 2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
Carbon Disclosure Project 2016 Full Data 2.1. Please select the option that best describes your risk management procedures with regard to climate change risks and opportunities Integrated into multi-disciplinary company wide risk management processes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2016 Full Data 2.2. Is climate change integrated into your business strategy? Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2016 Full Data 2.3. Do you engage in activities that could either directly or indirectly influence policy on climate change through any of the following? (tick all that apply) Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2016 Full Data Industry Group Food & Staples Retailing NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2016 Full Data ISIN US9311421039 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2016 Full Data 1.1. Where is the highest level of direct responsibility for climate change within your company? Board or individual/sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2016 Full Data 1.2. Do you provide incentives for the management of climate change issues, including the attainment of targets? Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2016 Full Data 12.1. How do your absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year compare to the previous year? Decreased NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2016 Full Data 14.1. Do you participate in any emission trading schemes? No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next 2 years NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2016 Full Data 14.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? No NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2016 Full Data 8.6. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your reported Scope 1 emissions 100 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2016 Full Data 3.2. Does the use of your goods and/or services directly enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party? Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2016 Full Data 4.1. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? In voluntary communications The number of corporate annual reports and voluntary publications (complete and/or underway) made about the company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance
Carbon Disclosure Project 2016 Full Data 2.3d. Do you publically disclose a list of all the research organizations that you fund? No NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2016 Full Data 3.1. Did you have an emissions reduction target that was active (ongoing or reached completion) in the reporting year? Absolute target; Intensity target; Renewable energy consumption and/or production target NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2016 Full Data 8.7. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your reported Scope 2 emissions NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2016 Full Data Account No 20402 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2016 Full Data Country USA NA
CDP A List 2019 Climate change Yes Yes The scoring methodology provides a score which assesses the level of detail and comprehensiveness of the content, as well as the company's awareness of climate change issues, management methods and progress towards action taken on climate change as report
CDP A List 2020 Climate change Yes Yes The scoring methodology provides a score which assesses the level of detail and comprehensiveness of the content, as well as the company's awareness of climate change issues, management methods and progress towards action taken on climate change as report
CDP Water Data 2013 Click here to see the 80 items available from this source
CDP Water Data 2013 3.1b. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to any water-related risks that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure. NA
CDP Water Data 2013 3.1c. Please explain why you do not know if your company is exposed to any water-related risks that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure, and your plans to assess this risk in the future. NA
CDP Water Data 2013 3.2. Country or geographical scale-Environment Policy & Reporting Facility
CDP Water Data 2013 3.2. What methodology do you use to analyze water-related risk across your operations?-Transparency & Reporting Answered
CDP Water Data 2013 3.2. What methodology do you use to analyze water-related risk across your operations? Water audits conducted at the L&T campuses combined with the internal know how.
CDP Water Data 2013 3.3. Do you require your key suppliers to report on their water use, risks and management? No
CDP Water Data 2013 3.4. Is your supply chain exposed to water-related risks (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure? Yes
CDP Water Data 2013 3.4b. Please explain why you do not consider your supply chain to be exposed to any water-related risks that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure. NA
CDP Water Data 2013 3.4c. Please explain why you do not know if your supply chain is exposed to water-related risks that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure, and your plans to assess this risk in the future. NA
CDP Water Data 2013 4.1. Has your business experienced any detrimental impacts related to water in the past five years? Yes
CDP Water Data 2013 4.1. Please describe any detrimental impacts to business related to water your company has faced in the past five years, their financial impacts and whether they have resulted in any changes to company practices- Transparency & Reporting Answered
CDP Water Data 2013 5.1. Do water-related issues present opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure? Yes
CDP Water Data 2013 5.1a. Please describe the current and/or future opportunities, the ways in which these opportunities affect or could affect your operations and your current or proposed strategies for exploiting them-Environmental Policy & Reporting 3 answers
CDP Water Data 2013 5.1a. Please describe the current and/or future opportunities, the ways in which these opportunities affect or could affect your operations and your current or proposed strategies for exploiting them-Environmental Policy & Reporting (value) NA
CDP Water Data 2013 2.1. Are any of your operations located in water-stressed regions? Yes
CDP Water Data 2013 2.1a. Please specify the method(s) you use to characterize water-stressed regions- Environmental policy & Reporting Other
CDP Water Data 2013 2.1a. Please specify the method(s) you use to characterize water-stressed regions- Environmental policy & Reporting (value) NA
CDP Water Data 2013 2.1b. Please list the water-stressed regions where you have operations and the percentage of your total operations in that area-Transparency & Reporting 2 answers
CDP Water Data 2013 2.1b. Please list the water-stressed regions where you have operations and the percentage of your total operations in that area-Transparency & Reporting (value) NA
CDP Water Data 2013 2.2. Are there other indicators (besides water stress) which you wish to report that help you to identify which of your operations are located in regions subject to water-related risk? Yes
CDP Water Data 2013 2.2a. Please list the relevant risk indicator of your total operations in that area-Environment Policy and Reporting NA
CDP Water Data 2013 2.2b. You may explain here why you do not wish to report or why you do not use other indicators to identify which of your operations are located in regions subject to water-related risk. NA
CDP Water Data 2013 2.3. Please specify the total proportion of your operations that are located in the regions at risk which you identified in questions 2.1 and/or 2.2. 0.0 21.9 99.0
CDP Water Data 2013 2.4. The basis to use to calculate the percentages used for questions 2.1 and/or 2.2 2 answers
CDP Water Data 2013 2.4. The basis to use to calculate the percentages used for questions 2.1 and/or 2.3 (value) NA
CDP Water Data 2013 2.5. Do any of your key inputs or raw materials (excluding water) come from regions subject to water-related risk? Yes
CDP Water Data 2013 2.5a. Please state or estimate the percentage of your key water-intensive inputs (excluding water) that come from these regions-Transparency & Reporting NA
CDP Water Data 2013 2.5b. You may explain here why you are not able to identify if any of your key inputs or raw materials come from regions subject to water-related risk and whether you have plans to explore this issue in the future. NA
CDP Water Data 2013 3.1. Is your company exposed to water-related risks (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure? Yes
CDP Water Data 2013 3.1a. Please describe the current and/or future risks to your operations, the ways in which these risks affect or could affect your operations and your current or proposed strategies for managing them-Transparency & Reporting NA
CDP Water Data 2013 3.1a. Please describe the current and/or future risks to your operations, the ways in which these risks affect or could affect your operations and your current or proposed strategies for managing them-Transparency & Reporting (value) NA
CDP Water Data 2013 6.1. Has your company identified any linkages or trade-offs between water and carbon emissions in its operations or supply chain? Yes
CDP Water Data 2013 6.1a. Please describe the linkages or trade-offs between water and carbon emissions in its operations or supply chain?--Transparency & Reporting 2 answers
CDP Water Data 2013 6.1a. Please describe the linkages or trade-offs and the related management policy or action between water and carbon emissions in its operations or supply chain?-Transparency & Reporting (value) NA
CDP Water Data 2013 1.1a. Please describe your policy, strategy or plan, including the highest level of responsibility for it within your company and its geographical reach-Transaprency & Reporting Australia/CCA's Water Policy covers all aspects of water related operations activities from both municipal and groundwater sources across the beverage and food businesses. NA United States of America/We have a philosophy to limit water waste and a strategy to identify reduction opportunities from development through operations through supply chain. We build our stores to green building standards (LEED and Green Globes), and e
CDP Water Data 2013 1.1a. Please describe your policy, strategy or plan, including the highest level of responsibility for it within your company and its geographical reach-Transaprency & Reporting (value) NA
CDP Water Data 2013 1.1b. Does the water policy, strategy or plan specify water-related targets or goals? Yes
CDP Water Data 2013 1.1c. Description of Target/goal, its type and geographical reach -Transparency & Reporting 2 answers
CDP Water Data 2013 8.2a. Please describe the quality, quantity and destination of the water that was the subject of the significant breach(es), the associated fines and any actions taken to minimise the risk of future non-compliance NA NA
CDP Water Data 2013 8.3. Are any water bodies and related habitats significantly affected by discharges of water or runoff from your operations? No NA
CDP Water Data 2013 8.3a. Please list any water bodies and related habitats which are significantly affected by discharge of water or runoff from your operations NA NA
CDP Water Data 2013 7.1. Are you able to provide data, whether measured or estimated, on water withdrawals within your operations? Yes
CDP Water Data 2013 7.1a. Please report the water withdrawals within your operations for the reporting year-Transparency & Reporting 0
CDP Water Data 2013 7.1a. Please report the water withdrawals within your operations for the reporting year-Transparency & Reporting (value) 0
CDP Water Data 2013 7.1b. Please explain why you are not able to provide data for water withdrawals. NA
CDP Water Data 2013 7.2. Are you able to provide data, whether measured or estimated, on water recycling/reuse within your operations? Yes
CDP Water Data 2013 7.2a. Please report the water recycling/reuse within your operations for the reporting year-Transparency & Reporting 3 answers
CDP Water Data 2013 7.2a. Please report the water recycling/reuse within your operations for the reporting year-Transparency & Reporting (value) NA
CDP Water Data 2013 9.1. Please provide any available financial intensity values for your company's water use across its operations 2 answers NA
CDP Water Data 2013 7.2b. Please explain why you are not able to provide data for water recycling/reuse within your operations-Transparency & Reporting No Response
CDP Water Data 2013 0.1. Introduction NA
CDP Water Data 2013 0.2. Reporting Year 2012-01-01
CDP Water Data 2013 0.3. Reporting Boundary Companies, entities or groups over which operational control is exercised
CDP Water Data 2013 8.3b. You may explain here why your company's discharge of water does not significantly affect any water bodies or associated habitats. The water consumption and discharge intensities of our facilities are relatively low. Most of our stores are located in areas with access to municipal sewage treatment services. The stores located near water bodies, such as lakes, rivers or seas or close NA
CDP Water Data 2013 7.2b. Please explain why you are not able to provide data for water recycling/reuse within your operations. NA
CDP Water Data 2013 7.3. Please use this space to describe the methodologies used for questions 7.1 and 7.2 or to report withdrawals or recycling/reuse in a different format to that set out above-Transparency & Reporting Answered
CDP Water Data 2013 7.4. Are any water sources significantly affected by your company's withdrawal of water? No
CDP Water Data 2013 7.4a. Please list any water sources significantly affected by your company's withdrawal of water. NA
CDP Water Data 2013 1.1c. Description of Target/goal, its type and geographical reach -Transparency & Reporting (value) NA
CDP Water Data 2013 5.1b. Please explain why you do not consider water-related issues to present opportunities to your company that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure or supply chain. NA
CDP Water Data 2013 5.1c. Please explain why you do not know whether water-related issues present opportunities to your company that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure. NA
CDP Water Data 2013 1.2. What specific actions has your company taken to manage water resources or engage stakeholders in water-related issues and what are their outcomes?-Transparency & Reporting (value) NA
CDP Water Data 2013 1.1d. You may explain here why your company does not have a water policy, strategy or plan and if you intend to put one in place. NA
CDP Water Data 2013 9.1. Please provide any available financial intensity values for your company's water use across its operations (value) NA NA
CDP Water Data 2013 9.2. Please provide any available water intensity values for your company's products or services across its operations. NA NA
CDP Water Data 2013 Please enter the name of the individual that has signed off (approved) the response and their job title Greg Trimble, Sr. Director, Global Energy Development and Reporting, Wal-Mart Stores Inc. NA
CDP Water Data 2013 1.2. What specific actions has your company taken to manage water resources or engage stakeholders in water-related issues and what are their outcomes?-Transparency & Reporting 2 answers
CDP Water Data 2013 7.3. Please use this space to describe the methodologies used for questions 7.1 and 7.2 or to report withdrawals or recycling/reuse in a different format to that set out above. Supplier invoices were used to measure water consumption in the U.S. and Mexico. On-site water meters were used to measure water consumption in the U.K., rainwater harvesting in Mexico and reused/recycled water in Mexico.
CDP Water Data 2013 0.4. Are there any geographies, activities, facilities or types of water inputs/outputs within this boundary which are not included in your disclosure? Yes
CDP Water Data 2013 0.4a. List of Exclusions & Reason for Exclusions-Transparency & Reporting 2 answers
CDP Water Data 2013 0.4a. List of Exclusions & Reason for Exclusions-Transparency & Reporting (value) NA
CDP Water Data 2013 1.1. Does your company have a water policy, strategy or management plan? No Yes Yes
CDP Water Data 2013 8.3b. You may explain here why your company's discharge of water does not significantly affect any water bodies or related habitats-Tansparency & Reporting Answered NA
CDP Water Data 2013 8.3c. Please explain why you do not know if any water bodies and associated habitats are significantly affected by discharge of water or runoff from your operations. NA NA
CDP Water Data 2013 7.4b. You may explain here why your company's withrawal of water does not significantly affect any water sources. Walmart operations which include retail stores, distribution centers and offices have a relatively low water consumption rate as compared to other industrial facilities. The majority of our impact on water resources is considered to be indirect and is a r
CDP Water Data 2013 7.4b. You may explain here why your company's withrawal of water does not significantly affect any water sources-Transparency & reporting Answered
CDP Water Data 2013 7.4c. Please explain why you do not know if any water sources are significantly affected by your company's withdrawal of water. NA
CDP Water Data 2013 8.1. Are you able to identify discharges of water from your operations by destination, by treatment method and by quantity and quality using standard effluent parameters? Yes
CDP Water Data 2013 8.1a. Please explain why you are not able to identify discharges from your operations by destination, treatment method , quantity and quality, and whether you have any plans to put in place systems that would enable you to do so. NA NA
CDP Water Data 2013 8.2. Did your company pay any penalties or fines for significant breaches of discharge agreements or regulations in the reporting period? Yes NA
CDP Water Data 2014 Click here to see the 69 items available from this source
CDP Water Data 2014 W5.7. ​For all facilities reported in W3.2a what proportion of their accounting data has been externally verified? Water withdrawals- total volumes/Not verified, Water withdrawals- volume by sources/Not verified, Water discharges- total volumes/Not verified, Water discharges- volume by destination/Not verified, Water discharges- volume by treatment method/Not verified
CDP Water Data 2014 W5.6. ​For the reporting period, please provide any available water intensity values for your organization's products or services across its operation No Response
CDP Water Data 2014 W5.2. For those facilities exposed to water risks that could generate a substantive change in your business, operations, revenue or expenditure, the number of which was reported in W3.2a, please detail which of the following water aspects are regularly me Water withdrawals- total volumes/76-100, Water withdrawals- volume by sources/Less than 1%, Water discharges- total volumes/1-25, Water discharges- volume by destination/, Water discharges- volume by treatment method/26-50, Water discharge quality data- q
CDP Water Data 2014 W2.4a. Which of the following stakeholders are always factored into your organization's water risk assessments? Customers/Relevant, not yet included/, Employees/Relevant, not yet included/, Investors/Relevant, not yet included/, Local communities/Relevant, not yet included/, NGOs/Relevant, included/Walmart engages stakeholders from government and respected internat
CDP Water Data 2014 W1.3. Has your organization experienced any detrimental impacts related to water in the reporting period? Yes
CDP Water Data 2014 W1.3a. ​Please describe the detrimental impacts experienced by your organization related to water in the reporting period Higher operating costs/Tighter supplier performance standards/We had an increase in water payments of 1.2% vs last year. Which represents 5 million pesos., Higher operating costs/Establish site-specific targets/Cost of water supplied from water trucks is
CDP Water Data 2014 W5.1. ​Please report the total withdrawal, discharge, consumption and recycled water volumes across your operations for the reporting period Total volume of water withdrawn/7680, Total volume of water discharged/52371, Total volume of water consumed/54058, Total volume of recycled water used/1686
CDP Water Data 2014 W2.1. ​Please select the option that best describes your procedures with regard to assessing water risks and provide an explanation as to why this option is suitable for your organization Water risk assessments undertaken independently of other risk assessments incorporating both direct operations and supply chain
CDP Water Data 2014 W2.1a. ​You may provide additional information about your approach to assessing water risks here Walmart stores and distribution locations were mapped in context of the current and future projections for both water stress and quality. We also used an assessment framework based on physical, regulatory and reputational risks for each market. We plan to
CDP Water Data 2014 W7.1. ​Was your organization subject to any penalties and/or fines for breaches of abstraction licenses, discharge consents or other water and wastewater related regulations in the reporting period? Yes, significant No No
CDP Water Data 2014 W7.1a. ​Please describe the penalties and/or fines for breaches of abstraction licenses, discharge consents or other water and wastewater related regulations and your plans for resolving them No Response
CDP Water Data 2014 W5.3. ​Water withdrawals: for the reporting period, please complete the table below with water accounting data for all facilities included in your answer to W3.2a No Response
CDP Water Data 2014 W5.4. ​Water discharge: for the reporting period, please provide the water accounting data for all facilities reported in W5.3 No Response
CDP Water Data 2014 W2.5a. ​Please provide the proportion of key suppliers you require to report on their water use, risks and management 0 26-50 76-100
CDP Water Data 2014 W2.5b. ​Please choose the option that best explains why you do not require your key suppliers to report on their water use, risks and management No Response
CDP Water Data 2014 W3.1. ​Is your organization exposed to water risks, either current and/or future, that could generate a substantive change in your business, operations, revenue or expenditure? Yes, direct operations and supply chain
CDP Water Data 2014 W6.2c. ​Please choose the option that best explains why your organization does not integrate water management into its business strategy and discuss any future plans to do so No Response
CDP Water Data 2014 W6.4. ​How does your organization's water-related capital expenditure (CAPEX) and operating expenditure (OPEX) during the most recent reporting period compare to the previous reporting period? -39.0 0.0 210.0
CDP Water Data 2014 W6.2a. ​Please choose the option(s) below that best explain how water has positively influenced your business strategy  NA 0 NA
CDP Water Data 2014 W6.2b. ​Please choose the option(s) below that best explains how water has negatively influenced your business strategy NA 0 NA
CDP Water Data 2014 W4.1c. ​Please choose the option that best explains why you do not know if water presents your organization with any opportunities that have the potential to provide substantive benefit NA No Response NA
CDP Water Data 2014 W3.2a. ​The number of facilities in your direct operations exposed to water risks that could generate a substantive change in your business, operations, revenue or expenditure and either the proportion of cost of goods sold, global revenue or global produ /11-20/Other: % other – proportion of global operations located in this region./Other: Walmart facilities in Mexico are located in several regions that experience continued water stress. The most prominent river basins include the Mexico Valley and Lerma-
CDP Water Data 2014 W3.2b. The inherent water risks that could generate a substantive change in your business, operations, revenue or expenditure, the potential impact to your direct operations and the strategies to mitigate them NA
CDP Water Data 2014 W2.4. Which of the following contextual issues are always factored into your organization's water risk assessments? Current water availability and quality parameters at a local level/Relevant, included/These are the two parameters that greatly affect our operation., Current water regulatory frameworks and tariffs at a local level/Relevant, included/Understanding regula
CDP Water Data 2014 W2.2. ​Please state how frequently you undertake water risk assessments, what geographical scale and how far into the future you consider NA 0 NA
CDP Water Data 2014 W2.3. ​Please state the methods used to assess water risks Other: ISciences L.L.C. performed the hydrological modeling of water-stress using multiple internationally recognized water risk indices. All Walmart locations were mapped in context of baseline water stress, baseline water quality and long-term change in
CDP Water Data 2014 W2.5. ​Do you require your key suppliers to report on their water use, risks and management? No Yes Yes
CDP Water Data 2014 W3.2. ​Please provide details as to how your organization defines substantive change in your business, operations, revenue or expenditure from water risk Water risks are considered highly location specific and therefore exposure to water risk is not considered to generated a substantive changes for the entire corporation currently/or in the future. We recognize that there are certain portions of our operat
CDP Water Data 2014 W3.2c. The inherent risks that could generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure, the potential impact to your supply chain and the strategies to mitigate them NA
CDP Water Data 2014 W3.2d. ​Please choose the option that best explains why you do not consider your organization to be exposed to water risks in your direct operations that could generate a substantive change in your business, operations, revenue or expenditure NA No Response NA
CDP Water Data 2014 W3.2e. ​Please choose the option that best explains why you do not consider your organization to be exposed to water risks in your supply chain that could generate a substantive change in your business, operations, revenue or expenditure NA No Response NA
CDP Water Data 2014 W0.4a. List of Exclusions & Reason for Exclusions No Response
CDP Water Data 2014 W1.1. Please rate the importance (current and future) of water quality and water quantity to the success of your organization Direct use: sufficient amounts of good quality freshwater available for use across your own operations/Vital for operations, Direct use: sufficient amounts of recycled, brackish and/or produced water available for use across your own operations/Important,
CDP Water Data 2014 W1.2. Have you evaluated how water quality and water quantity affects /could affect the success (viability, constraints) of your organization's growth strategy? Not evaluated Yes, evaluated over the next 10 years Yes, evaluated over the next 10 years
CDP Water Data 2014 W6.1. ​Who has the highest level of direct responsibility for water within your organization and how frequently are they briefed? No individual or committee with overall responsibility for water Senior Manager/Officer Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board
CDP Water Data 2014 W6.2. ​Is water management integrated into your business strategy? No Yes Yes
CDP Water Data 2014 W5.5. ​Water consumption: for the reporting period, please provide water consumption data for all facilities reported in W5.3 No Response
CDP Water Data 2014 W1.2a. Please explain how your organization evaluated the effects of water quality and water quantity on the success (viability, constraints) of your organization's growth strategy? All Walmart locations were mapped in context of baseline water stress, baseline water quality and long-term change in water stress. ISciences L.L.C. performed the hydrological modelling of water-stress using multiple internationally recognized water risk
CDP Water Data 2014 W1.2b. What is the main reason for not having evaluated how water quality and water quantity affects /could affect the success (viability, constraints) of your organization's growth strategy, and are there any plans in place to do so in the future? No Response
CDP Water Data 2014 W7.1b. ​Please indicate the total of all penalties and/or fines for breaches of abstraction licenses, discharge consents or other water and wastewater related regulations as a percentage of total operating expenditure (OPEX) compared to last year Much Higher NA Much Lower
CDP Water Data 2014 W8.1. ​Do you have any company wide targets (quantitative) or goals (qualitative) related to water? No No Yes, targets and goals
CDP Water Data 2014 W8.1a. ​Please complete the following table with information on company wide quantitative targets (ongoing or reached completion during the reporting period) and an indication of progress made No Response
CDP Water Data 2014 Account No NA 20402 NA NA
CDP Water Data 2014 Complexity Full NA
CDP Water Data 2014 GICS Industry Food & Staples Retailing NA
CDP Water Data 2014 GICS Industry Group Food & Staples Retailing NA
CDP Water Data 2014 GICS Sector Consumer Staples NA
CDP Water Data 2014 GICS Sub-Industry Hypermarkets & Super Centers NA
CDP Water Data 2014 Primary Expansion NA NA
CDP Water Data 2014 Public Public NA
CDP Water Data 2014 Response Account No Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. NA
CDP Water Data 2014 Response Organisation NA 20402 NA NA
CDP Water Data 2014 Secondary Expansions Water Global 500,Water Pilot Scored,Water S&P 500, NA
CDP Water Data 2014 Submitted Date 2014-10-01T01:08:01+01:00 NA
CDP Water Data 2014 Version 12.39 NA
CDP Water Data 2014 W0.1. Introduction Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (NYSE: WMT), or “Walmart,” serves customers and members more than 250 million times per week at 10,942 retail units under 69 different banners in 27 countries, supported by distribution, logistics, and sourcing operations. Walmart wa
CDP Water Data 2014 W0.2. Reporting Year 2013-01-01
CDP Water Data 2014 W0.3. Reporting Boundary Companies, entities or groups over which operational control is exercised
CDP Water Data 2014 W0.4. Are there any geographies, activities, facilities or types of water inputs/outputs within this boundary which are not included in your disclosure? Yes
CDP Water Data 2014 W4.1. ​Does water present strategic, operational or market opportunities that substantively benefit/have the potential to benefit your organization? Yes
CDP Water Data 2014 W8.1c. ​Please explain why you do not have any water-related targets or goals and discuss any plans to develop these in the future No Response
CDP Water Data 2014 W9. ​Corresponding job category Energy manager
CDP Water Data 2014 W9. ​Job title Sr. Manager, Energy
CDP Water Data 2014 W9.1. Please provide the following information for the person that has signed off (approved) your  CDP water response Joby Carlson
CDP Water Data 2014 W4.1a. ​Please describe the opportunities water presents to your organization and your strategies to realize them Cost savings//Reduce dependency from water supply from municipality and variability of fees./4-6 years/Mexico, Increased brand value//New markets and consumers that seek ecological products. Increase of sales Reduce uncertainty on products supply/4-6 yea
CDP Water Data 2014 W4.1b. ​Please choose the option that best explains why water does not present your organization with any opportunities that have the potential to provide substantive benefit NA No Response NA
CDP Water Data 2014 W8.1b. ​Please describe any company wide qualitative goals (ongoing or reached completion during the reporting period) and your progress in achieving these No Response
CDP Water Data 2014 W6.4. ​Motivation for water-related spending changes No Response
CDP Water Data 2014 W6.4. ​Water-related spending: % of total OPEX during this reporting period compared to last reporting period -0.5 0.0 120.0
CECP (Chief Executives for Corporate Purpose) Members of the Committee Encouraging Corporate Philanthropy NA Yes Yes Members of the Committee Encouraging Corporate Philanthropy
Corporate Equality Index 2017 Click here to see the 11 items available from this source
Corporate Equality Index 2017 10 points 2a Yes NA
Corporate Equality Index 2017 10 points 2b Yes NA
Corporate Equality Index 2017 10 points 2c Yes NA
Corporate Equality Index 2017 10 points 3a Yes NA
Corporate Equality Index 2017 10 points 3b Yes NA
Corporate Equality Index 2017 15 points 1a Yes NA
Corporate Equality Index 2017 15 points 1b Yes NA
Corporate Equality Index 2017 15 points 4 Yes NA
Corporate Equality Index 2017 5 points 1c Yes NA
Corporate Equality Index 2017 Fortune 1000 0 NA
Corporate Equality Index 2017 Headquarters Location Bentonville, AR NA
Corporate Equality Index 2019 Click here to see the 13 items available from this source
Corporate Equality Index 2019 10 points 2a 0.333 1.0 1.0 Equivalency in same- and different-sex spousal medical and soft benefits
Corporate Equality Index 2019 10 points 2b 0.333 1.0 1.0 Equivalency in same- and differentsex domestic partner medical and soft benefits
Corporate Equality Index 2019 Fortune 1000 1000 1 1 NA
Corporate Equality Index 2019 Headquarters Location NA NA
Corporate Equality Index 2019 5 points 3d 0.333 1.0 1.0 Contractor/supplier non-discrimination standards and philanthropic giving guidelines
Corporate Equality Index 2019 10 points 2c 0.333 1.0 1.0 Equal health coverage for transgender individuals without exclusion for medically necessary care
Corporate Equality Index 2019 10 points 3a 0.333 1.0 1.0 Three LGBTQ internal training and education best practices
Corporate Equality Index 2019 10 points 3b 0.333 1.0 1.0 Employee group or diversity council
Corporate Equality Index 2019 15 points 1a 0.333 1.0 1.0 Prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation for all operations (15 points)
Corporate Equality Index 2019 15 points 1b 0.333 1.0 1.0 Prohibits discrimination based on gender identity for all operations
Corporate Equality Index 2019 15 points 3c 0.333 1.0 1.0 Three distinct efforts of outreach or engagement to broader LGBTQ community, and if supplier diversity program is in place, must include LGBTQ suppliers
Corporate Equality Index 2019 2018 CEI Rating 0 100 100 NA
Corporate Equality Index 2019 2019 CEI Rating 0 100 100 NA
Corporate Equality Index 2020 Click here to see the 13 items available from this source
Corporate Equality Index 2020 10 points 3b 0.5 1.0 1.0 Employee group or diversity council
Corporate Equality Index 2020 10 points 2a 0.5 1.0 1.0 Equivalency in same- and different-sex spousal medical and soft benefits
Corporate Equality Index 2020 10 points 2b 0.5 1.0 1.0 Equivalency in same- and differentsex domestic partner medical and soft benefits
Corporate Equality Index 2020 10 points 2c 0.5 1.0 1.0 Equal health coverage for transgender individuals without exclusion for medically necessary care
Corporate Equality Index 2020 10 points 3a 0.5 1.0 1.0 Three LGBTQ internal training and education best practices
Corporate Equality Index 2020 15 points 1a 0.5 1.0 1.0 Prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation for all operations (15 points)
Corporate Equality Index 2020 15 points 1b 0.5 1.0 1.0 Prohibits discrimination based on gender identity for all operations
Corporate Equality Index 2020 15 points 3c 0.5 1.0 1.0 Three distinct efforts of outreach or engagement to broader LGBTQ community, and if supplier diversity program is in place, must include LGBTQ suppliers
Corporate Equality Index 2020 2019 CEI Rating 999 100 1
Corporate Equality Index 2020 2020 CEI Rating 999 100 1
Corporate Equality Index 2020 -25 points 4 NA NA 1 Employers will have 25 points deducted from their score for a large-scale official or public anti-LGBTQ blemish on their recent records.
Corporate Equality Index 2020 5 points 3d 0.5 1.0 1.0 Contractor/supplier non-discrimination standards and philanthropic giving guidelines
Corporate Equality Index 2020 Fortune 1000 999 55 1
CEMEFI (Centro Mexicano para la Filantropía) ITSC Index Index Transparency in Corporate Sustainability 1.345 3.473 3.886 A study conducted by Social Management and Cooperation (Gesoc), the Center for the Study of Institutional Governance (CEGI) and the American Institute of Higher Business Management (IPADE), that detects the 33 companies with operations in Mexico.
CEO ACT!ON For Diversity & Inclusion CEOAction list Yes Yes CEO-driven business commitment to drive measurable action and meaningful change in advancing diversity, equity and inclusion in the workplace
Ceres Climate & Energy Resolutions 2011 Click here to see the 3 items available from this source
Ceres Climate & Energy Resolutions 2011 2011 Vote 2.0% 2.0% 92.8% % of votes, the resolutions are filed by some of the nation’s largest public pension funds, foundations, and religious, labor and socially responsible investors
Ceres Climate & Energy Resolutions 2011 Ask NA Require supplier(s) to publish annual sustainability reports NA Resolutions are part of broader investor efforts encouraging companies to address the full range of environmental, social and governance issues
Ceres Climate & Energy Resolutions 2011 Rating omitted filed withdrawn Shareholder resolutions filed by our investor network participants on sustainability-related issues that companies are facing
Ceres Climate & Energy Resolutions 2015 Click here to see the 6 items available from this source
Ceres Climate & Energy Resolutions 2015 Resolution Summary Set goals to reduce GHGs for maritime shipping Sustainability-related issues that companies are facing, focusing on climate change, energy, water scarcity, and sustainability reporting
Ceres Climate & Energy Resolutions 2015 Sector Retail The company's sector
Ceres Climate & Energy Resolutions 2015 Vote 98.9 35.8 1.8 % of votes, the resolutions are filed by some of the nation’s largest public pension funds, foundations, and religious, labor and socially responsible investors
Ceres Climate & Energy Resolutions 2015 Filer Mary Pat Tifft Who filed the resolution?
Ceres Climate & Energy Resolutions 2015 Issues Climate Change;Greenhouse Gas Emissions;Supply Chain Resolutions are part of broader investor efforts encouraging companies to address the full range of environmental, social and governance issues
Ceres Climate & Energy Resolutions 2015 Rating Omitted Voted Withdrawn; Company will address Shareholder resolutions filed by our investor network participants on sustainability-related issues that companies are facing
Ceres Climate & Energy Resolutions 2018 Rating Yes Yes Shareholder resolutions filed by our investor network participants on sustainability-related issues that companies are facing.
Ceres Resolutions 2019 Rating Yes Yes Shareholder resolutions filed by our investor network participants on sustainability-related issues that companies are facing.
Ceres Resolutions 2020 Rating Yes Yes Shareholder resolutions filed by our investor network participants on sustainability-related issues that companies are facing.
Corporate Human Rights Benchmark 2018 CHRD Rating 0.0 23.8 87.0 NA
Corporate Human Rights Benchmark 2019 CHRD Rating 0.0 22.7 83.3
Corporate Human Rights Benchmark 2020 CHRD Rating 0.0 9.5 25.0
Corporate Human Rights Benchmark 2022 CHRD Rating 0.0 9.5 25.0
Corporate Human Rights Benchmark 2023 CHRD Rating 0.0 18.5 65.9
Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI) Click here to see the 21 items available from this source
Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI) Energy and Climate 0.0 3.0 9.0 NA
Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI) Establish Screening Mechanism 0.0 4.0 9.0 NA
Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI) Identify and Manage main Polluting Sectors 0.0 0.0 6.5 NA
Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI) Industry NA
Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI) Pollutant Release and Transfer 0.0 0.0 9.0 NA
Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI) Promote Public Green Choice 0.0 4.0 4.0 NA
Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI) Promote Supply Chain Transparency 0.0 1.0 8.0 NA
Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI) Push Suppliers to Take Corrective Actions 0.0 2.0 9.0 NA
Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI) Respond to Enquiries and Engage with Public 0.0 2.0 10.0 NA
Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI) Responsible Wastewater Management 0.0 0.0 7.0 NA
Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI) Screen Upstream Suppliers 0.0 0.0 7.5 NA
Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI) Total Score 0.0 20.0 89.0 NA
Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI) Direct the public attention to the environmental performance of Chinese suppliers 0.0 0.0 4.0
Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI) Push suppliers to disclose pollutant release and transfer data 0.0 2.0 4.0
Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI) Establish Screening 1
Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI) Push suppliers to disclose energy and climate data 10
Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI) Responsible management of chemical and raw material suppliers 1
Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI) Responsible management of logistic supplier 0
Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI) Responsible management of solid waste 0
Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI) Responsible management of wastewater 0
Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI) Supplier self-management 1
Climate Registry List of companies that have voluntarily committed to CR guidelines NA Yes Yes The Climate Registry is a nonprofit collaboration among North American states, provinces, territories and Native Sovereign Nations that sets consistent and transparent standards to calculate, verify and publicly report greenhouse gas emissions into a single registry. The Registry supports both voluntary and mandatory reporting programs and provides comprehensive, accurate data to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Corporate Register Corporate Report Count 1 6 34 NA
The Center for Political Accountability Click here to see the 82 items available from this source
The Center for Political Accountability Grand Total (Percent of Max 69 points) 0 6 100 NA
The Center for Political Accountability Policies (Percent of Max 18 points) 0 75 100 NA
The Center for Political Accountability 19. Board committee reviews trade associations and other? Revised 2017 No NA
The Center for Political Accountability 8. Disclose senior managers who have final authority? 0 1 2
The Center for Political Accountability 9. Disclose an archive? 0 0 4
The Center for Political Accountability Raw Total 0 15 70
The Center for Political Accountability 12. Policy contributions will promote the interests of the company, without regard for executives? 0 0 2
The Center for Political Accountability 13. Describe proper recipients? 0 1 2
The Center for Political Accountability 14. Describe its public policy positions? 0 0 2
The Center for Political Accountability 15. Requires senior managers to have final authority? 0 1 2
The Center for Political Accountability 16. Board of directors regularly oversees? 0 2 2
The Center for Political Accountability 17. Board committee that reviews policy? 0 1 2
The Center for Political Accountability 18. Board committee reviews political expenditures? 0 0 2
The Center for Political Accountability 19. Board committee reviews trade associations and other? 0 0 2
The Center for Political Accountability percentage 0.0 27.14 100.0 NA
The Center for Political Accountability raw score 0 19 68 NA
The Center for Political Accountability 2. Disclose payments to 527 groups? Revised 2017 Yes NA
The Center for Political Accountability 20. Board committee approves political expenditures? Revised 2017 No NA
The Center for Political Accountability 21. Board committee, composed entirely of outside directors? Revised 2017 Yes NA
The Center for Political Accountability 22. Report its political spending semiannually? Revised 2017 No NA
The Center for Political Accountability 23. dedicated political disclosure web page? Revised 2017 Partial NA
The Center for Political Accountability 24. disclose process for or affirmative statement on compliance? Revised 2017 No NA
The Center for Political Accountability 3. Disclose independent political expenditures ? Revised 2017 No NA
The Center for Political Accountability 20. Board committee approves political expenditures? 0 0 2
The Center for Political Accountability 21. Board committee, composed entirely of outside directors? 0 2 2
The Center for Political Accountability 22. Report its political spending semiannually? 0 0 4
The Center for Political Accountability 23. dedicated political disclosure web page? 0 0 2
The Center for Political Accountability 24. disclose process for or affirmative statement on compliance? 0 0 2
The Center for Political Accountability 3. Disclose independent political expenditures ? 0 0 4
The Center for Political Accountability 4. Disclose payments to trade associations? 0 0 6
The Center for Political Accountability 5. Disclose payments to other tax-exempt, 501(c)(4)s? 0 0 6
The Center for Political Accountability 15. Requires senior managers to have final authority? Revised 2017 Yes NA
The Center for Political Accountability 16. Board of directors regularly oversees? Revised 2017 Yes NA
The Center for Political Accountability 17. Board committee that reviews policy? Revised 2017 No NA
The Center for Political Accountability 18. Board committee reviews political expenditures? Revised 2017 Yes NA
The Center for Political Accountability Score (100%) 0 21.4286 100 NA
The Center for Political Accountability 4. Disclose payments to trade associations? Revised 2017 No NA
The Center for Political Accountability 5. Disclose payments to other tax-exempt, 501(c)(4)s? Revised 2017 No NA
The Center for Political Accountability 6. Disclose payments made by trade associations or other? Revised 2017 No NA
The Center for Political Accountability 7. Disclose ballot measures payments? Revised 2017 No NA
The Center for Political Accountability 6. Disclose payments made by trade associations or other? 0 0 2
The Center for Political Accountability Compliance/Oversight (Percent of Max 28 points) 0 28 100 NA
The Center for Political Accountability Disclosure (Percent of Max 23 points) 0 17 100 NA
The Center for Political Accountability 11. Policy to give only through PAC contributions? Revised 2017 No
The Center for Political Accountability 12. Policy contributions will promote the interests of the company, without regard for executives? Revised 2017 No NA
The Center for Political Accountability 13. Describe proper recipients? Revised 2017 No NA
The Center for Political Accountability 14. Describe its public policy positions? Revised 2017 Yes NA
The Center for Political Accountability Does the company disclose a detailed policy governing its political expenditures from corporate funds 0 0 6
The Center for Political Accountability Does the company disclose an internal process for or an affirmative statement on ensuring compliance with its political spending policy 0 0 2
The Center for Political Accountability Does the company have a public policy requiring senior managers to oversee and have final authority over all of the company’s political spending 0 0 2
The Center for Political Accountability Does the company have a publicly available policy permitting political contributions only through voluntary employee-funded PAC contributions N N Y
The Center for Political Accountability Does the company have a publicly available policy stating that all of its contributions will promote the interests of the company and will be made without regard for the private political preferences of executives 0 0 2
The Center for Political Accountability Does the company have a publicly available policy that the board of directors regularly oversees the company’s corporate political activity 0 0 2
The Center for Political Accountability Does the company have a specified board committee that approves political expenditures from corporate funds 0 0 2
The Center for Political Accountability Does the company have a specified board committee that reviews the company’s payments to trade associations and other tax-exempt organizations that may be used for political purposes 0 0 2
The Center for Political Accountability 2. Disclose payments to 527 groups? 0 0 4
The Center for Political Accountability Does the company have a specified board committee that reviews the company’s policy on political expenditures 0 0 2
The Center for Political Accountability Does the company have a specified board committee that reviews the company’s political expenditures made with corporate funds 0 0 2
The Center for Political Accountability Does the company have a specified board committee, composed entirely of outside directors, that oversees its political activity 0 0 2
The Center for Political Accountability Does the company make available a dedicated political disclosure web page found through search or accessible within three mouse-clicks from homepage 0 0 2
The Center for Political Accountability Does the company post on its website a detailed report of its political spending with corporate funds semiannually 0 0 4
The Center for Political Accountability Does the company publicly describe its public policy positions that become the basis for its spending decisions with corporate funds 0 0 2
The Center for Political Accountability 8. Disclose senior managers who have final authority? Revised 2017 Yes NA
The Center for Political Accountability 9. Disclose an archive? Revised 2017 No NA
The Center for Political Accountability Index Score 0.0 47.1 100.0
The Center for Political Accountability 1. Disclose contributions to candidates, parties and committees? 0 0 4
The Center for Political Accountability 10. Disclose a detailed policy? 0 3 6
The Center for Political Accountability 11. Policy to give only through PAC contributions? N
The Center for Political Accountability 1. Disclose contributions to candidates, parties and committees? Revised 2017 No NA
The Center for Political Accountability 10. Disclose a detailed policy? Revised 2017 Yes NA
The Center for Political Accountability Does the company publicly describe the types of entities considered to be proper recipients of the company’s political spending 0 0 2
The Center for Political Accountability Does the company publicly disclose a list of the amounts and recipients of payments made by trade associations or other tax exempt organizations of which the company is either a member or donor 0 0 2
The Center for Political Accountability 7. Disclose ballot measures payments? 0 0 4
The Center for Political Accountability Does the company publicly disclose an archive of each political expenditure report, including all direct and/or indirect contributions, for each year since the company began disclosing the information (or at least for the past five years) 0 0 4
The Center for Political Accountability Does the company publicly disclose corporate contributions to political candidates, parties and committees, including recipient names and amounts given 0 0 4
The Center for Political Accountability Does the company publicly disclose independent political expenditures made in direct support of or opposition to a campaign, including recipient names and amounts given 0 0 4
The Center for Political Accountability Does the company publicly disclose payments made to influence the outcome of ballot measures, including recipient names and amounts given 0 0 4
The Center for Political Accountability Does the company publicly disclose payments to 527 groups, such as governors associations and super PACs, including recipient names and amounts given 0 0 4
The Center for Political Accountability Does the company publicly disclose payments to other tax-exempt organizations, such as 501(c)(4)s, that the recipient may use for political purposes 0 0 6
The Center for Political Accountability Does the company publicly disclose payments to trade associations that the recipient organization may use for political purposes 0 0 6
The Center for Political Accountability Does the company publicly disclose the company’s senior managers (by position/title of the individuals involved) who have final authority over the company’s political spending decisions 0 0 2
The Center for Political Accountability Score 0 47 100
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2015 Click here to see the 26 items available from this source
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2015 Does the company disclose a detailed policy governing its political expenditures from corporate funds 3
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2015 Does the company disclose an internal process for or an affirmative statement on ensuring compliance with its political spending policy 0
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2015 Does the company have a public policy requiring senior managers to oversee and have final authority over all of the company’s political spending 1
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2015 Does the company have a publicly available policy permitting political contributions only through voluntary employeefunded PAC contributions N
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2015 Does the company have a publicly available policy stating that all of its contributions will promote the interests of the company and will be made without regard for the private political preferences of executives 0
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2015 Does the company publicly disclose a list of the amounts and recipients of payments made by trade associations or other tax exempt organizations of which the company is either a member or donor 0
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2015 Does the company publicly disclose an archive of each political expenditure report, including all direct and/or indirect contributions, for each year since the company began disclosing the information (or at least for the past five years) 0
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2015 Does the company publicly disclose corporate contributions to political candidates, parties and committees, including recipient names and amounts given 0
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2015 Does the company publicly disclose independent political expenditures made in direct support of or opposition to a campaign, including recipient names and amounts given 0
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2015 Does the company publicly disclose payments made to influence the outcome of ballot measures, including recipient names and amounts given 0
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2015 Does the company publicly disclose payments to 527 groups, such as governors associations and super PACs, including recipient names and amounts given 0
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2015 Does the company publicly disclose payments to other tax-exempt organizations, such as 501(c)(4)s, that the recipient may use for political purposes 0
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2015 Total Score 15
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2015 Does the company have a specified board committee, composed entirely of outside directors, that oversees its political activity 2
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2015 Does the company have a publicly available policy that the board of directors regularly oversees the company’s corporate political activity 2
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2015 Does the company have a specified board committee that approves political expenditures from corporate funds 0
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2015 Does the company have a specified board committee that reviews the company’s payments to trade associations and other tax-exempt organizations that may be used for political purposes 1
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2015 Does the company have a specified board committee that reviews the company’s policy on political expenditures 2
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2015 Does the company make available a dedicated political disclosure web page found through search or accessible within three mouse-clicks from homepage 1
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2015 Does the company post on its website a detailed report of its political spending with corporate funds semiannually 0
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2015 Does the company publicly describe its public policy positions that become the basis for its spending decisions with corporate funds 1
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2015 Does the company publicly describe the types of entities considered to be proper recipients of the company’s political spending 0
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2015 Does the company publicly disclose payments to trade associations that the recipient organization may use for political purposes 0
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2015 Does the company publicly disclose the company’s senior managers (by position/title of the individuals involved) who have final authority over the company’s political spending decisions 1
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2015 Score (100%) 21.4
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2015 Does the company have a specified board committee that reviews the company’s political expenditures made with corporate funds 1
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2016 Click here to see the 26 items available from this source
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2016 Does the company publicly disclose corporate contributions to political candidates, parties and committees, including recipient names and amounts given 0
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2016 Does the company publicly disclose independent political expenditures made in direct support of or opposition to a campaign, including recipient names and amounts given 0
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2016 Does the company publicly disclose payments to 527 groups, such as governors associations and super PACs, including recipient names and amounts given 0
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2016 Does the company publicly disclose payments to other tax-exempt organizations, such as 501(c)(4)s, that the recipient may use for political purposes 0
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2016 Does the company disclose a detailed policy governing its political expenditures from corporate funds 3
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2016 Does the company disclose an internal process for or an affirmative statement on ensuring compliance with its political spending policy 0
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2016 Does the company have a public policy requiring senior managers to oversee and have final authority over all of the company’s political spending 1
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2016 Does the company have a publicly available policy permitting political contributions only through voluntary employeefunded PAC contributions N
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2016 Does the company have a publicly available policy stating that all of its contributions will promote the interests of the company and will be made without regard for the private political preferences of executives 0
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2016 Does the company have a publicly available policy that the board of directors regularly oversees the company’s corporate political activity 2
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2016 Does the company have a specified board committee that approves political expenditures from corporate funds 0
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2016 Does the company have a specified board committee that reviews the company’s payments to trade associations and other tax-exempt organizations that may be used for political purposes 0
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2016 Does the company have a specified board committee that reviews the company’s policy on political expenditures 2
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2016 Does the company have a specified board committee that reviews the company’s political expenditures made with corporate funds 1
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2016 Total Score 15
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2016 Does the company post on its website a detailed report of its political spending with corporate funds semiannually 0
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2016 Does the company publicly describe the types of entities considered to be proper recipients of the company’s political spending 0
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2016 Does the company publicly disclose a list of the amounts and recipients of payments made by trade associations or other tax exempt organizations of which the company is either a member or donor 0
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2016 Does the company publicly disclose an archive of each political expenditure report, including all direct and/or indirect contributions, for each year since the company began disclosing the information (or at least for the past five years) 0
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2016 Does the company publicly describe its public policy positions that become the basis for its spending decisions with corporate funds 2
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2016 Does the company have a specified board committee, composed entirely of outside directors, that oversees its political activity 2
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2016 Does the company make available a dedicated political disclosure web page found through search or accessible within three mouse-clicks from homepage 1
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2016 Does the company publicly disclose payments made to influence the outcome of ballot measures, including recipient names and amounts given 0
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2016 Does the company publicly disclose payments to trade associations that the recipient organization may use for political purposes 0
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2016 Does the company publicly disclose the company’s senior managers (by position/title of the individuals involved) who have final authority over the company’s political spending decisions 1
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2016 Score (100%) 21.4
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2018 Click here to see the 20 items available from this source
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2018 Does the company have a specified board committee that approves political expenditures from corporate funds 0 NA
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2018 Does the company have a specified board committee that reviews the company’s payments to trade associations and other tax-exempt organizations that may be used for political purposes 2 NA
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2018 Does the company have a specified board committee that reviews the company’s policy on political expenditures 0 NA
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2018 Does the company publicly disclose independent political expenditures made in direct support of or opposition to a campaign, including recipient names and amounts given 0 NA
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2018 Does the company publicly describe the types of entities considered to be proper recipients of the company’s political spending 0 NA
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2018 Does the company publicly disclose payments made to influence the outcome of ballot measures, including recipient names and amounts given 0 NA
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2018 Does the company publicly disclose payments to 527 groups, such as governors associations and super PACs, including recipient names and amounts given 0 NA
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2018 Does the company publicly disclose payments to trade associations that the recipient organization may use for political purposes 0 NA
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2018 Does the company post on its website a detailed report of its political spending with corporate funds semiannually 2 NA
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2018 Does the company publicly describe its public policy positions that become the basis for its spending decisions with corporate funds 2 NA
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2018 Does the company have a specified board committee that reviews the company’s political expenditures made with corporate funds 0 NA
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2018 Does the company have a specified board committee, composed entirely of outside directors, that oversees its political activity 0 NA
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2018 Does the company disclose a detailed policy governing its political expenditures from corporate funds 6 NA
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2018 Does the company have a public policy requiring senior managers to oversee and have final authority over all of the company’s political spending 2 NA
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2018 Does the company have a publicly available policy stating that all of its contributions will promote the interests of the company and will be made without regard for the private political preferences of executives 0 NA
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2018 Does the company publicly disclose the company’s senior managers (by position/title of the individuals involved) who have final authority over the company’s political spending decisions 2 NA
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2018 Score (100%) 27.1 NA
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2018 Total Score 0 NA
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2018 Does the company publicly disclose an archive of each political expenditure report, including all direct and/or indirect contributions, for each year since the company began disclosing the information (or at least for the past five years) 0 NA
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2018 Does the company publicly disclose corporate contributions to political candidates, parties and committees, including recipient names and amounts given 0 NA
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2019 Click here to see the 25 items available from this source
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2019 Does the company publicly disclose payments to 527 groups, such as governors associations and super PACs, including recipient names and amounts given No No Yes
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2019 Does the company publicly disclose payments to other tax-exempt organizations, such as 501(c)(4)s, that the recipient may use for political purposes No No Yes
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2019 Does the company publicly disclose payments to trade associations that the recipient organization may use for political purposes No No Yes
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2019 Does the company publicly disclose the company’s senior managers (by position/title of the individuals involved) who have final authority over the company’s political spending decisions No Yes Yes
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2019 Score (100%) 0 27.1429 100
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2019 Does the company disclose an internal process for or an affirmative statement on ensuring compliance with its political spending policy No No Yes
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2019 Does the company have a public policy requiring senior managers to oversee and have final authority over all of the company’s political spending No Yes Yes
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2019 Does the company have a specified board committee that reviews the company’s policy on political expenditures No Partial Yes
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2019 Does the company have a specified board committee that reviews the company’s political expenditures made with corporate funds No Partial Yes
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2019 Does the company have a specified board committee, composed entirely of outside directors, that oversees its political activity No Yes Yes
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2019 Does the company make available a dedicated political disclosure web page found through search or accessible within three mouse-clicks from homepage No Partial Yes
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2019 Does the company post on its website a detailed report of its political spending with corporate funds semiannually No No Yes
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2019 Does the company publicly describe its public policy positions that become the basis for its spending decisions with corporate funds No No Yes
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2019 Does the company have a publicly available policy permitting political contributions only through voluntary employeefunded PAC contributions No No Yes
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2019 Does the company have a publicly available policy stating that all of its contributions will promote the interests of the company and will be made without regard for the private political preferences of executives No No Yes
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2019 Does the company have a publicly available policy that the board of directors regularly oversees the company’s corporate political activity No Yes Yes
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2019 Does the company have a specified board committee that approves political expenditures from corporate funds No Partial Yes
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2019 Does the company have a specified board committee that reviews the company’s payments to trade associations and other tax-exempt organizations that may be used for political purposes No Partial Yes
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2019 Does the company publicly disclose independent political expenditures made in direct support of or opposition to a campaign, including recipient names and amounts given No No Yes
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2019 Does the company publicly disclose payments made to influence the outcome of ballot measures, including recipient names and amounts given No No Yes
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2019 Does the company publicly disclose an archive of each political expenditure report, including all direct and/or indirect contributions, for each year since the company began disclosing the information (or at least for the past five years) No No Yes
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2019 Does the company publicly disclose corporate contributions to political candidates, parties and committees, including recipient names and amounts given No No Yes
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2019 Does the company disclose a detailed policy governing its political expenditures from corporate funds No Yes Yes
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2019 Does the company publicly describe the types of entities considered to be proper recipients of the company’s political spending No No Yes
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2019 Does the company publicly disclose a list of the amounts and recipients of payments made by trade associations or other tax exempt organizations of which the company is either a member or donor No No Yes
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2020 Click here to see the 25 items available from this source
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2020 Does the company publicly disclose a list of the amounts and recipients of payments made by trade associations or other tax exempt organizations of which the company is either a member or donor No No Yes
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2020 Does the company publicly disclose an archive of each political expenditure report, including all direct and/or indirect contributions, for each year since the company began disclosing the information (or at least for the past five years) No No Yes
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2020 Does the company publicly disclose corporate contributions to political candidates, parties and committees, including recipient names and amounts given No No Yes
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2020 Does the company publicly disclose independent political expenditures made in direct support of or opposition to a campaign, including recipient names and amounts given No No Yes
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2020 Does the company publicly disclose payments made to influence the outcome of ballot measures, including recipient names and amounts given No No Yes
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2020 Does the company publicly disclose payments to 527 groups, such as governors associations and super PACs, including recipient names and amounts given No No Yes
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2020 Does the company publicly disclose payments to other tax-exempt organizations, such as 501(c)(4)s, that the recipient may use for political purposes No No Yes
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2020 Does the company publicly describe its public policy positions that become the basis for its spending decisions with corporate funds No No Yes
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2020 Does the company publicly describe the types of entities considered to be proper recipients of the company’s political spending No No Yes
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2020 Does the company publicly disclose payments to trade associations that the recipient organization may use for political purposes No No Yes
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2020 Does the company publicly disclose the company’s senior managers (by position/title of the individuals involved) who have final authority over the company’s political spending decisions No Yes Yes
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2020 Score (%) 0 27 100
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2020 Does the company disclose a detailed policy governing its political expenditures from corporate funds No Yes Yes
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2020 Does the company disclose an internal process for or an affirmative statement on ensuring compliance with its political spending policy No No Yes
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2020 Does the company have a publicly available policy stating that all of its contributions will promote the interests of the company and will be made without regard for the private political preferences of executives No No Yes
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2020 Does the company have a publicly available policy that the board of directors regularly oversees the company’s corporate political activity No Yes Yes
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2020 Does the company have a specified board committee that approves political expenditures from corporate funds No Partial Yes
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2020 Does the company have a specified board committee that reviews the company’s political expenditures made with corporate funds No Partial Yes
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2020 Does the company have a specified board committee, composed entirely of outside directors, that oversees its political activity No Yes Yes
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2020 Does the company make available a dedicated political disclosure web page found through search or accessible within three mouse-clicks from homepage No Partial Yes
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2020 Does the company post on its website a detailed report of its political spending with corporate funds semiannually No No Yes
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2020 Does the company have a specified board committee that reviews the company’s payments to trade associations and other tax-exempt organizations that may be used for political purposes No Partial Yes
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2020 Does the company have a specified board committee that reviews the company’s policy on political expenditures No Partial Yes
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2020 Does the company have a public policy requiring senior managers to oversee and have final authority over all of the company’s political spending No Yes Yes
CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability 2020 Does the company have a publicly available policy permitting political contributions only through voluntary employee-funded PAC contributions No No Yes
CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2010 Click here to see the 9 items available from this source
CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2010 Philanthropy Rank 100 1 1 NA
CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2010 Weighted Average Score 50 NA 300 NA
CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2010 Human Rights Rank 100 9 1 NA
CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2010 Climate Change Rank 100 135 1 NA
CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2010 Corporate Governance Rank 100 NA 1 NA
CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2010 Employee Relations 750 NA 1 NA
CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2010 Rank 100 21 1 NA
CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2010 Environmental Rank 100 96 1 NA
CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2010 Financial Risk 254 NA 1 NA
CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2011 Click here to see the 9 items available from this source
CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2011 Climate Change Rank 352 46 1
CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2011 Corporate Governance Rank 913 248 1
CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2011 Employee Relations 330 260 1
CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2011 Environmental Rank 276 185 1
CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2011 Human Rights Rank 236 236 1
CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2011 Philanthropy Rank 492 82 1
CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2011 Financial Risk 968 127 1
CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2011 Rank 100 95 1
CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2011 Weighted Average Score 176.5 172.7 46.2
3BL Media 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2020 Click here to see the 2 items available from this source
3BL Media 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2020 Top 100? (Rank or NA) 100 NA 1
3BL Media 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2020 HUMAN RIGHTS (ABSOLUTE) 50.42 QualityScore : Social : Human Rights
3BL Media 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2021 Click here to see the 2 items available from this source
3BL Media 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2021 Overall Weighted Score 71.51 73.92 91.66
3BL Media 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2021 Rank 100 75 1 A place in the ranking.
Div50 2010 DiversityBusiness.com Div50 2010 50 4 1 Rank on a list of companies selected as the most diverse by Diversity Business.
Div50 2009 DiversityBusiness.com Div50 2009 50 7 1 Rank on a list of companies selected as the most diverse by Diversity Business.
Div50 2011 DiversityBusiness.com Div50 2011 50 1 1 Rank on a list of companies selected as the most diverse by Diversity Business.
Div50 2012 DiversityBusiness.com Div50 2012 50 2 1 Rank on a list of companies selected as the most diverse by Diversity Business.
Div50 2013 DiversityBusiness.com Div50 2013 50 1 1 Rank on a list of companies selected as the most diverse by Diversity Business.
Div50 2014 DiversityBusiness.com Div50 2014 50 2 1 Rank on a list of companies selected as the most diverse by Diversity Business.
Div50 2015 DiversityBusiness.com Div50 2015 50 2 1 Rank on a list of companies selected as the most diverse by Diversity Business.
Div50 2016 DiversityBusiness.com Div50 2016 1 Rank on a list of companies selected as the most diverse by Diversity Business.
Diversity, Inc. Top 50 2019 Diversity Inc Top 50 2019 50 34 1 Rank in the top fifty companies for diversity from Diversity Inc.
Diversity, Inc. Top 50 2020 Diversity Inc Top 50 2020 50 32 1 Rank in the top fifty companies for diversity from Diversity Inc.
Diversity, Inc. Top 50 2021 Diversity Inc Top 50 2021 22 Yes Rank in the top fifty companies for diversity from Diversity Inc.
Diversity, Inc. Top 50 2022 Diversity Inc Top 50 2022 50 26 1 Rank in the top fifty companies for diversity from Diversity Inc.
Diversity, Inc. Top 50 2023 Diversity Inc Top 50 2023 50 17 1 Rank in the top fifty companies for diversity from Diversity Inc.
Dow Jones Sustainability North America Index Dow Jones Sustainability Index North America Yes A benchmark for North American sustainability investments.
Diversity MBA Magazine Top 50 2010 50 Out Front Companies For Diverse Managers To Work 50 10 1 The goal of the 2010 Top 50 Companies for Diverse Managers to Work was to identify U.S.-based companies that seek to hire people of color and women managers because of the value they bring to the business.
EDF Climate Corps 2014 EDF Climate Corps 2014 Yes Yes Participated during 2013
EDF Climate Corps 2015 EDF Climate Corps 2015 Yes Yes Participated during 2015
EDF Climate Corps 2021 EDF Climate Corps 2021 Yes Yes Participated during 2021
EDF Climate Corps 2022 EDF Climate Corps 2022 Yes Yes Participated during 2022
EDF Climate Corps 2023 EDF Climate Corps 2023 Yes Participated during 2022
Responsible Business Alliance Member of the Responsible Business Alliance Yes Yes RBA Code of Conduct provides guidance in five critical areas of CSR performance: Labor, Health and Safety, Environment, Management System, and Ethics.
Environmental Investment Organisation Click here to see the 15 items available from this source
Environmental Investment Organisation Scope 3 Benchmark Company No No Yes Scope 3 Benchmark Companies. Reported figures of benchmark companies act as inferred values. These figures are the highest reported Scope 3 carbon intensity for that industy sector.
Environmental Investment Organisation Scope 1+2 Intensity 11162 143 0 Intensity is calculated by adding together a company's Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions and dividing by its turnover.
Environmental Investment Organisation Accepted or Inferred Scope 3 Intensity 8547.1 2475.0 64.5 Unless the company reports all 15 Scope 3 categories as defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Standard, an inferred figure based on the highest reported intensity for that sector, across the Global ET Universe, is shown
Environmental Investment Organisation Category No Public Data Red Public, Complete, and Verified data Companies are placed into one of four data or 'disclosure' categories: 1) Public, Complete, and Verified data; 2) Public, Complete, and Unverified data; 3) Public, Incomplete, Verified or Unverified data; 4) No Public Data
Environmental Investment Organisation Combined Scope 1+2+3 Intensity 12161.7 1380.2 34.2 Combined Scope 1+2_3 Intensity is calculated by adding together a company's Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions at 100% (disclosed or inferred) + 50% of Scope 3 emissions (disclosed or inferred).
Environmental Investment Organisation Market Value ($Million) 1667.9 228245.0 358143.1 A company's market value, or market capitalism (number of shares times x share price). This value was taken on 23.08.2011
Environmental Investment Organisation No. of Scope 3 Categories Reported 1 0 15 This column indicates the number of Scope 3 Categories reported. Once placed into one of the four Disclosure Categories, companies are ranked by the number of Scope 3 categories disclosed.
Environmental Investment Organisation Reported Scope 1+2 Total (tCO2e) 282000000 0 843 The total reported Scope 1 (all direct emissions) and Scope 2 (indirect electricity emissions) of the company in metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent (tCO2e) as defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol
Environmental Investment Organisation North America 300 Carbon Rank 300 148 1 Carbon Ranking of North American companies. Ranking is determined by EIO Methodology. See Source Info sheet for comments on it
Environmental Investment Organisation Carbon Ranking 609 Carbon Ranking by EIO
Environmental Investment Organisation Reported Scope 3 Total (tCO2e) 670000000 0 0 Indicated the total reported Scope 3 (all other indirect emissions) of the company in metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent (tCO2e) as defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol. Where no Scope 3 emissions are reported, this is recorded as "No Data"
Environmental Investment Organisation Scope 1 & 2 Benchmark Company No No Yes Scope 1 & 2 Benchmark Companies. These companies act as benchmarks to derive inferred values; the values are the highest reported carbon intensity for that industy sector.
Environmental Investment Organisation Reported Scope 3 Intensity 8547.1 0.0 0.0 Scope 3 Intensity is calculated by dividing the Reported Scope 3 figure by the company's turnover. Where no Scope 3 is reported, this is recorded as "No Data"
Environmental Investment Organisation Scope 3 Disclosure Leader Award No No Yes ET Scope 3 Disclosure Leaders. For 2011, this award has been given to comapnies disclosing five or more Scope 3 categories as defined by the Greenhous Gas protocol
Environmental Investment Organisation Global 800 Carbon Rank 800 722 1 Carbon Ranking of 800 international companies. Ranking is determined by EIO Methodology. See Source Info sheet for comments on it
EPA Green Power Partners List Click here to see the 7 items available from this source
EPA Green Power Partners List Annual Green Power Usage (kWh) 105 5023096337 2718227534 EPA's Green Power Partner state
EPA Green Power Partners List Green Power Resources 1 2 2 EPA's Green Power Partner state
EPA Green Power Partners List GPP Profile Page https://www.epa.gov/greenpower/meet-our-partners?partner=walmartinc EPA's Green Power Partner state
EPA Green Power Partners List GP % of Total Electricity Use 0.05 27.63 3.91 EPA's Green Power Partner GP % of Total Electricity Use
EPA Green Power Partners List Industry Retail EPA's Green Power Partner Industry
EPA Green Power Partners List Partner Since 4/7/2009 EPA's Green Power Partner Since
EPA Green Power Partners List State AR EPA's Green Power Partner state
EPA Transport Data Click here to see the 6 items available from this source
EPA Transport Data Sum of CO2 gm metric 1700 Grams per mile of carbon dioxide.
EPA Transport Data Sum of CO2 gtm metric 95 Grams per ton transported mile of carbon dioxide.
EPA Transport Data Sum of NOx gm metric 2.5 Grams per mile of nitrogen oxide.
EPA Transport Data Sum of NOx gtm metric 0.125 Grams per ton transported mile of nitrogen oxide.
EPA Transport Data Sum of PM gm metric 0.15 Grams per mile of particular matter.
EPA Transport Data Sum of PM gtm metric 0.0065 Grams per ton transported mile of particulate matter.
EPA Transport Data 2015 Click here to see the 6 items available from this source
EPA Transport Data 2015 Sum of CO2 gm metric 10600 0 0 Grams per mile of carbon dioxide.
EPA Transport Data 2015 Sum of CO2 gtm metric 722.5 0.0 0.0 Grams per ton transported mile of carbon dioxide.
EPA Transport Data 2015 Sum of NOx gm metric 66.0 0.0 0.0 Grams per mile of nitrogen oxide.
EPA Transport Data 2015 Sum of PM gtm metric 0.56 0.0 0.0 Grams per ton transported mile of particulate matter.
EPA Transport Data 2015 Sum of NOx gtm metric 3.85 0.0 0.0 Grams per ton transported mile of nitrogen oxide.
EPA Transport Data 2015 Sum of PM gm metric 4.2 0.0 0.0 Grams per mile of particular matter.
EPA Transport Data 2017 Click here to see the 6 items available from this source
EPA Transport Data 2017 Sum of PM gm metric 0.026 Grams per mile of particular matter.
EPA Transport Data 2017 Sum of CO2 gm metric 1400 NA Grams per mile of carbon dioxide.
EPA Transport Data 2017 Sum of CO2 gtm metric 849.0 72.0 38.5 Grams per ton transported mile of carbon dioxide.
EPA Transport Data 2017 Sum of NOx gm metric 1 Grams per mile of nitrogen oxide.
EPA Transport Data 2017 Sum of PM gtm metric 0.1375 0.0005 0.0003 Grams per ton transported mile of particulate matter.
EPA Transport Data 2017 Sum of NOx gtm metric 3.875 0.085 0.06 Grams per ton transported mile of nitrogen oxide.
EPA Transport Data 2018 Click here to see the 7 items available from this source
EPA Transport Data 2018 Sum of CO2 gm metric 975 1405 14135
EPA Transport Data 2018 Sum of NOx gm metric 1 1 30
EPA Transport Data 2018 Sum of PM gm metric 0 0 2
EPA Transport Data 2018 Average of CO2 gm bin 5 1 1
EPA Transport Data 2018 Average of NOx gm bin 5 1 1
EPA Transport Data 2018 Average of PM gm bin 5 2 1
EPA Transport Data 2018 Number of Facilities 1 1 8
EPA Transport Data 2019 Click here to see the 6 items available from this source
EPA Transport Data 2019 Sum of CO2 gm metric 15395 1385 1050
EPA Transport Data 2019 Sum of CO2 gtm metric 415.5 70.5 38.5 Grams per ton transported mile of carbon dioxide.
EPA Transport Data 2019 Sum of NOx gm metric 43.5 1.3 1.2
EPA Transport Data 2019 Sum of NOx gtm metric 3.69 0.07 0.01 Grams per ton transported mile of nitrogen oxide.
EPA Transport Data 2019 Sum of PM gm metric 1.85 0.02 0.01
EPA Transport Data 2019 Sum of PM gtm metric 0.118 0.001 0.001 Grams per ton transported mile of particulate matter.
EPA Transport Data 2020 Click here to see the 6 items available from this source
EPA Transport Data 2020 Sum of CO2 gm metric 980 1550 9750
EPA Transport Data 2020 Sum of CO2 gtm metric 20.7 85.5 595.0 Grams per ton transported mile of carbon dioxide.
EPA Transport Data 2020 Sum of NOx gm metric 1.15 1.4 38.84
EPA Transport Data 2020 Sum of NOx gtm metric 0.06 0.09 1.85 Grams per ton transported mile of nitrogen oxide.
EPA Transport Data 2020 Sum of PM gm metric 0.013 0.018 0.976
EPA Transport Data 2020 Sum of PM gtm metric 0.001 0.001 0.03 Grams per ton transported mile of particulate matter.
EPA Transport Data 2021 Click here to see the 6 items available from this source
EPA Transport Data 2021 Sum of CO2 gm metric 13535 1450 150
EPA Transport Data 2021 Sum of CO2 gtm metric 683 79 21 Grams per ton transported mile of carbon dioxide.
EPA Transport Data 2021 Sum of NOx gm metric 34 2 1
EPA Transport Data 2021 Sum of NOx gtm metric 1.72 0.13 0.065 Grams per ton transported mile of nitrogen oxide.
EPA Transport Data 2021 Sum of PM gm metric 0.88 0.006 0.002
EPA Transport Data 2021 Sum of PM gtm metric 0.029 0.0 0.002 Grams per ton transported mile of particulate matter.
Equilar 200 2016 Click here to see the 4 items available from this source
Equilar 200 2016 TOTAL COMP. (2) $0 NA $0 Total compensation includes information disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table of company proxy statements including salary, bonus, stock and options valued at grant date, and other compensation
Equilar 200 2016 CHIEF EXECUTIVE (1) C. Douglas McMillon The Equilar 200 includes U.S.-based or listed companies with more than $1 billion in revenue that filed proxy statements by April 30, 2016.
Equilar 200 2016 CHIEF EXECUTIVE (2) NA The Equilar 200 includes U.S.-based or listed companies with more than $1 billion in revenue that filed proxy statements by April 30, 2016.
Equilar 200 2016 TOTAL COMP. (1) $0 $0 $0 Total compensation includes information disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table of company proxy statements including salary, bonus, stock and options valued at grant date, and other compensation
Equilar 200 2017 Click here to see the 2 items available from this source
Equilar 200 2017 CHIEF EXECUTIVE C. Douglas McMillon The Equilar 200 includes U.S.-based or listed companies with more than $1 billion in revenue that filed proxy statements by April 30, 2017.
Equilar 200 2017 TOTAL COMP. $13792002 $0 $130211163 Total compensation includes information disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table of company proxy statements including salary, bonus, stock and options valued at grant date, and other compensation
Equilar 200 2018 Click here to see the 2 items available from this source
Equilar 200 2018 CHIEF EXECUTIVE C. Douglas McMillon The Equilar 200 includes U.S.-based or listed companies with more than $1 billion in revenue that filed proxy statements by April 30, 2017.
Equilar 200 2018 TOTAL COMP. $14513403 $0 $49969163 Total compensation includes information disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table of company proxy statements including salary, bonus, stock and options valued at grant date, and other compensation
Equilar 200 2019 Click here to see the 2 items available from this source
Equilar 200 2019 CHIEF EXECUTIVE C. Douglas McMillon The Equilar 200 includes U.S.-based or listed companies with more than $1 billion in revenue that filed proxy statements by April 30, 2019.
Equilar 200 2019 TOTAL COMP. $2284044884 $22527249 $14513403 Total compensation includes information disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table of company proxy statements including salary, bonus, stock and options valued at grant date, and other compensation
Equilar 200 2021 Click here to see the 2 items available from this source
Equilar 200 2021 CHIEF EXECUTIVE  C. Douglas McMillon The Equilar 200 includes U.S.-based or listed companies with more than $1 billion in revenue that filed proxy statements by April 30, 2021.
Equilar 200 2021 TOTAL COMP. 1 21 15 Total compensation includes information disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table of company proxy statements including salary, bonus, stock and options valued at grant date, and other compensation
Equilar 200 2022 Click here to see the 2 items available from this source
Equilar 200 2022 CHIEF EXECUTIVE C. Douglas McMillon The Equilar 200 includes U.S.-based or listed companies with more than $1 billion in revenue that filed proxy statements by April 30, 2022.
Equilar 200 2022 TOTAL COMP. $19171090 $0 $180813849 Total compensation includes information disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table of company proxy statements including salary, bonus, stock and options valued at grant date, and other compensation
Equilar 100 2023 Click here to see the 2 items available from this source
Equilar 100 2023 CHIEF EXECUTIVE C. Douglas McMillon The Equilar 200 includes U.S.-based or listed companies with more than $1 billion in revenue that filed proxy statements by April 30, 2022.
Equilar 100 2023 TOTAL COMP. $22847623 $0 $182136137 Total compensation includes information disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table of company proxy statements including salary, bonus, stock and options valued at grant date, and other compensation
Equal Opportunity 2010 Equal Opportunity top 50 companies 2010 50 6 1 Rank on the Equal Opportunity 2010 List.
Equal Opportunity 2009 Equal Opportunity top 50 companies 2009 50 25 1 Rank on the Equal Opportunity 2009 List.
Equal Opportunity 2011 Equal Opportunity top 50 companies 2011 50 13 1 Rank on the Equal Opportunity 2011 List.
Equal Opportunity 2017 Equal Opportunity top 50 companies 2017 16 Rank on the Equal Opportunity 2017 List.
Equal Opportunity 2018 Equal Opportunity top 50 companies 2018 50 41 1 Rank on the Equal Opportunity 2018 List.
Equal Opportunity 2021 Equal Opportunity top 50 companies 2021 50 17 1 Rank on the Equal Opportunity 2021 List.
Equal Opportunity 2022 Equal Opportunity top 50 companies 2022 50 11 1 Rank on the Equal Opportunity 2022 List.
Fashion Transparency Index 2019 Click here to see the 2 items available from this source
Fashion Transparency Index 2019 Number of Brands 2
Fashion Transparency Index 2019 Average of Score 0 48 58
Fashion Transparency Index 2020 Click here to see the 2 items available from this source
Fashion Transparency Index 2020 Fashion Transparency Rating 0.0 31.0 73.0
Fashion Transparency Index 2020 Number of Brands 1 2 5
Fashion Transparency Index 2021 Click here to see the 2 items available from this source
Fashion Transparency Index 2021 Fashion Transparency Rating 0 26 78
Fashion Transparency Index 2021 Number of Brands 1 1 5
Fashion Transparency Index 2022 Click here to see the 2 items available from this source
Fashion Transparency Index 2022 Number of Brands 1 1 5
Fashion Transparency Index 2022 Fashion Transparency Rating 0 24 78
Fashion Transparency Index 2023 Click here to see the 2 items available from this source
Fashion Transparency Index 2023 Fashion Transparency Rating 0.0 23.0 1.0
Fashion Transparency Index 2023 Number of Brands 1 1 8
FCPA Corporate Investigations On FCPA Corporate Investigations List Yes Yes NA
Fortune Change the World 2016 Fortune Change the World 2016 15 NA
Fortune Change the World 2017 Fortune Change the World 2017 Yes Yes NA
Fortune Change the World 2019 Fortune Change the World 2019 52 5 1 NA
Fortune Change the World 2020 Fortune Change the World 2020 9 Yes
Fortune Change the World 2021 Fortune Change the World 2021 15 Yes
Fortune Change the World 2022 Fortune Change the World 2022 50 3 1
Fortune Change the World 2023 Fortune Change the World 2023 Yes Yes
Forest 500 Click here to see the 28 items available from this source
Forest 500 Commitment Strength Average (out of 28) 1 15 28 The total score for the type, scope and ambition of a commodity commitment
Forest 500 Commodity Score Average (out of 84) 1 34 62 A commodity score is the total of the commitment strength, reporting and implementation, and social considarations scores. The overall Commodity score is an average for all of a companys commodities.
Forest 500 Reporting and implementation Average (out of 34) 0 7 19 The total score for reporting and implementation against commodity commitments
Forest 500 Reporting and implementation FIs (out of 20) NA
Forest 500 Segments NA Segments of rated companies
Forest 500 Social Consideration Average (out of 16) 0 5 16 The total score for social considerations addresed within commodity commitments
Forest 500 Social Consideration FIs (out of 22) NA
Forest 500 Total score 0.0 0.38 0.73 The total overall score (overall approach plus commodity scores)
Forest 500 Assessed for NA Companies are assessed for all relevant commodities that they produce or buy
Forest 500 Commitment Strength Average (out of 36) 0 20 34 The total score for the type, scope and ambition of a commodity commitment
Forest 500 Commitment Strength FIs (out of 42) 0 NA 34
Forest 500 Commodity Score Average (out of 86) 0 32 68 A commodity score is the total of the commitment strength, reporting and implementation, and social considarations scores. The overall Commodity score is an average for all of a companys commodities.
Forest 500 Commodity Score FIs (out of 64) NA
Forest 500 Industry sectors NA Industry sectors of rated companies
Forest 500 Industry sectors for DataTables NA Industry sectors of rated companies
Forest 500 Overall Approach(outof16) 1 8 16 The total score for non-commodity specific indicators, including action on land-use change emissions
Forest 500 Reporting and Implementation Average (out of 38) 11 The total score for reporting and implementation against commodity commitments
Forest 500 Social Consideration Average(out of 18) 1 8 15 The total score for social considerations addresed within commodity commitments
Forest 500 Forest 500 Report Yes A benchmark for European sustainability investments.
Forest 500 Commodities Beef|Leather|Palm oil|Pulp & Paper|Soy|Timber Segments of rated companies
Forest 500 Sector Food retail|Furniture & flooring Segments of rated companies
Forest 500 Overall approach (out of 14) 0 7 12 The total score for non-commodity specific indicators, including action on land-use change emissions
Forest 500 Overall approach FIs (out of 16) NA
Forest 500 Associated Human Rights Abuses Average (out of 17) 0 5 15 Tracking of potential human rights abuses.
Forest 500 Commitment Strength Average (out of 17) 0 13 17 The total score for the type, scope and ambition of a commodity commitment
Forest 500 Commodity Score Average (out of 90) 0 33 60 A commodity score is the total of the commitment strength, reporting and implementation, and social considarations scores. The overall Commodity score is an average for all of a companys commodities.
Forest 500 Overall approach Average (out of 10) 0 6 10 The total score for non-commodity specific indicators, including action on land-use change emissions
Forest 500 Reporting and implementation Average (out of 56) 0 15 32 Reporting and implementation of tracking.
Global Business Coalition Advocacy & Leadership NA Yes Yes Companies have powerful built-in platforms to advocate for action against HIV/AIDS, TB and malaria. When they join together, their voices are that much more effective at creating real change.
GEMMAQ Click here to see the 2 items available from this source
GEMMAQ CEO Male Does the company have a woman CEO
GEMMAQ Chair Male Does the company have a woman chairperson
Global G.A.P. Member Producer/Supplier, Retailer and Associate Members of the Global G.A.P. NA Yes Yes Producer/Supplier, Retailer and Associate Members of the Global G.A.P.
Top 100 Military Friendly Employers 2010 Top 100 Military Friendly Employers 2010 by G.I. Jobs Magazine 100 64 1 A supplier to an armed service or other agency or department that supports the military. It also includes companies that are commitment to hiring former military.
Top 100 Military Friendly Employers 2012 Top 100 Military Friendly Employers 2012 by G.I. Jobs Magazine 100 78 1 NA
Top 100 Military Friendly Employers 2013 Top 100 Military Friendly Employers 2013 by G.I. Jobs Magazine 100 67 1 A supplier to an armed service or other agency or department that supports the military. It also includes companies that are commitment to hiring former military.
Top 100 Military Friendly Employers 2014 Top 100 Military Friendly Employers 2014 by G.I. Jobs Magazine Yes Yes A supplier to an armed service or other agency or department that supports the military. It also includes companies that are commitment to hiring former military.
Top 100 Military Friendly Employers 2015 Top 100 Military Friendly Employers 2015 by G.I. Jobs Magazine Yes Yes A supplier to an armed service or other agency or department that supports the military. It also includes companies that are commitment to hiring former military.
Top 100 Military Friendly Employers 2016 Top 100 Military Friendly Employers 2016 by G.I. Jobs Magazine Yes Yes A supplier to an armed service or other agency or department that supports the military. It also includes companies that are commitment to hiring former military.
Top 100 Military Friendly Employers 2017 Top 100 Military Friendly Employers 2017 by G.I. Jobs Magazine Yes Yes A supplier to an armed service or other agency or department that supports the military. It also includes companies that are commitment to hiring former military.
Top 100 Military Friendly Employers 2018 Top 100 Military Friendly Employers 2018 by G.I. Jobs Magazine Yes Yes A supplier to an armed service or other agency or department that supports the military. It also includes companies that are commitment to hiring former military.
Top 100 Military Friendly Employers 2021 Top 100 Military Friendly Employers 2021 by G.I. Jobs Magazine Yes Yes A supplier to an armed service or other agency or department that supports the military. It also includes companies that are commitment to hiring former military.
Good Jobs First Subsidy Tracker Click here to see the 22 items available from this source
Good Jobs First Subsidy Tracker Major Industry of Parent retailing
Good Jobs First Subsidy Tracker Ownership Structure publicly traded
Good Jobs First Subsidy Tracker Specific Industry of Parent retail-discount stores
Good Jobs First Subsidy Tracker Subsidy Source state
Good Jobs First Subsidy Tracker Sum of Investment Data ($) 986 0 0
Good Jobs First Subsidy Tracker Sum of Loan Value ($) 784 0 0
Good Jobs First Subsidy Tracker Sum of Megadeal Contribution ($) 234 0 0
Good Jobs First Subsidy Tracker Sum of Number of Jobs or Training Slots ($) 0 -173 987
Good Jobs First Subsidy Tracker Sum of Subsidy Value ($) 986 254124 0
Good Jobs First Subsidy Tracker Sum of Subsidy Value Adjusted For Megadeal ($) 986 254124 0
Good Jobs First Subsidy Tracker Type of Subsidy tax credit/rebate
Good Jobs First Subsidy Tracker cik 104,169
Good Jobs First Subsidy Tracker hq_country USA
Good Jobs First Subsidy Tracker hq_state Arkansas
Good Jobs First Subsidy Tracker industry retail-discount stores
Good Jobs First Subsidy Tracker major_industry retailing
Good Jobs First Subsidy Tracker num_recs 567
Good Jobs First Subsidy Tracker ownership publicly traded
Good Jobs First Subsidy Tracker russell3000 yes yes
Good Jobs First Subsidy Tracker stock_ticker WMT
Good Jobs First Subsidy Tracker subsidy_total $8 $232 $0
Good Jobs First Subsidy Tracker Location 0
Good Jobs First Violation Tracker Click here to see the 6 items available from this source
Good Jobs First Violation Tracker Civil/Criminal civil
Good Jobs First Violation Tracker Count of Violations 170 10 1
Good Jobs First Violation Tracker Level of Government federal
Good Jobs First Violation Tracker Penalty Year 2,020
Good Jobs First Violation Tracker Primary Offense safety-related offenses
Good Jobs First Violation Tracker Sum of Penalty Amount ($) 999 5514017859 0
Glassdoor Click here to see the 68 items available from this source
Glassdoor ceo:image:src https://media.glassdoor.com/people/sqll/715/walmart-ceo1634219925682.png Link to an image of the CEO
Glassdoor ceo:pctDisapprove 0 41 100 Percent of ratings of the CEO that were disapproving
Glassdoor employer:jobsUrl http://www.glassdoor.com/Jobs/Walmart-Jobs-E715.htm?t.p=7785&t.s=j&t.a=c Link to this employer's jobs
Glassdoor employer:ratingDescription OK Overall description of employee views
Glassdoor employer:reviewsUrl http://www.glassdoor.com/Reviews/Walmart-Reviews-E715.htm?t.p=7785&t.s=j&t.a=c Link to employee reviews
Glassdoor ceo:pctApprove 0 59 100 Percent of ratings of the CEO that were approving
Glassdoor ceo:title CEO The title of the company's CEO
Glassdoor Compensation And Benefits Rating 1 3 5 The Top Companies for Work-Life Balance list is based on employee feedback shared in company reviews on Glassdoor.
Glassdoor Culture And Values Rating 3.1 The Top Companies for Work-Life Balance list is based on employee feedback shared in company reviews on Glassdoor.
Glassdoor employer:numberOfRatings 1 119641 6549 The number of Glassdoor users who have rated this company as a place to work.
Glassdoor diversityAndInclusionRating 1.0 3.6 5.0
Glassdoor diversityAndInclusionRatingCount 0 41105 572
Glassdoor ceo:id 310135 The title of the company's CEO
Glassdoor employer:hq Bentonville, AR HQ for the company
Glassdoor employer:industry Walmart Industry for the company
Glassdoor employer:jobsAnchorText Walmart Jobs Link to this employer's jobs
Glassdoor employer:reviewsAnchorText Walmart Reviews Link to employee reviews
Glassdoor careerOpportunitiesRating 3.3 NA
Glassdoor ceo.image.height 200 NA
Glassdoor ceo.image.width 200 NA
Glassdoor exactMatch false NA
Glassdoor featuredReview.attributionURL https://www.glassdoor.com/Reviews/Employee-Review-Walmart-RVW78220967.htm NA
Glassdoor featuredReview.cons Sometimes people miss the toilet and it becomes nasty NA
Glassdoor featuredReview.currentJob true NA
Glassdoor featuredReview.headline Awesome NA
Glassdoor featuredReview.id 71638797 NA
Glassdoor featuredReview.jobTitle Janitor NA
Glassdoor featuredReview.jobTitleFromDb Janitor NA
Glassdoor ceo:name Doug McMillon The name of the company's CEO
Glassdoor ceo_image_height 200
Glassdoor ceo_image_src https://media.glassdoor.com/people/sqll/715/walmart-ceo1634219925682.png
Glassdoor ceo_image_width 200
Glassdoor featuredReview_id 78220967
Glassdoor parentEmployer_isSunset NA
Glassdoor parentEmployer_logo_mediumUrl NA
Glassdoor parentEmployer_logo_normalUrl NA
Glassdoor parentEmployer_logo_smallUrl NA
Glassdoor parentEmployer_sunsetMessage NA
Glassdoor RatingNumber 51 113584 886
Glassdoor Glassdoor Employer Ratings 1.0 3.3 5.0 The Top Companies for Work-Life Balance list is based on employee feedback shared in company reviews on Glassdoor.
Glassdoor ceo:numberOfRatings 1 33096 4026 The number of ratings of the CEO
Glassdoor employer:website https://careers.walmart.com Link to employee reviews
Glassdoor featuredReview_location Turlock, CA
Glassdoor featuredReview.location Bethlehem, PA NA
Glassdoor featuredReview.overall 5 NA
Glassdoor featuredReview.overallNumeric 5 NA
Glassdoor featuredReview.pros Cleanest toilets and I always got days off. NA
Glassdoor featuredReview.reviewDateTime 2023-07-13 07:21:21.833 NA
Glassdoor id 715 NA
Glassdoor industryId 200109 NA
Glassdoor industryName NA NA
Glassdoor isEEP false NA
Glassdoor name Walmart NA
Glassdoor parentEmployer.id NA NA
Glassdoor parentEmployer.isSunset NA NA
Glassdoor parentEmployer.logo.mediumUrl NA NA
Glassdoor parentEmployer.logo.normalUrl NA NA
Glassdoor parentEmployer.logo.smallUrl NA NA
Glassdoor parentEmployer.name NA NA
Glassdoor parentEmployer.relationship NA NA
Glassdoor parentEmployer.relationshipDate NA NA
Glassdoor parentEmployer.sunsetMessage NA NA
Glassdoor recommendToFriendRating 0 55 100 NA
Glassdoor sectorId 10022 NA
Glassdoor sectorName Retail & Wholesale NA
Glassdoor seniorLeadershipRating 1 2.8 5 NA
Glassdoor squareLogo https://media.glassdoor.com/sqll/715/walmart-squareLogo-1625065045944.png NA
Glassdoor workLifeBalanceRating 1 3.0 5 NA
Goodness 500 2009 Click here to see the 3 items available from this source
Goodness 500 2009 Percentage of Profit 0.0% 1.3% 9.2% NA
Goodness 500 2009 Cash donated $0 $0 $400000000 NA
Goodness 500 2009 Executive Diversity 3.0% 13.0% 39.0% NA
Goodness 500 2012 Click here to see the 6 items available from this source
Goodness 500 2012 Cash donated $0 NA $369570300 In US$.
Goodness 500 2012 Executive Diversity 0.0% 6.0% 41.0% Percentage of officers and directors that are female.
Goodness 500 2012 Toxicity produced 773771631 96065 0 In pounds.
Goodness 500 2012 Toxicity released 113515588 19371 0 In pounds.
Goodness 500 2012 Percentage of Profit 0.0% 0.0% 1.086% Percentage of profit donated.
Goodness 500 2012 Rank 500 155 1 NA
Intengine Click here to see the 10 items available from this source
Intengine Certifications 0 2 2
Intengine country USA
Intengine Sum of Certifications 0 1 6
Intengine Number of Certifications 2
Intengine Listing URL https://intengine.com/directory/profile/19053-wal-mart-stores-inc
Intengine city Bentonville
Intengine listingURL https://intengine.com/directory/profile/arkansas/bentonville/wal-mart-stores-inc/17393
Intengine locationId 17393
Intengine phone 479-273-4000
Intengine state Arkansas
Greenpeace Seafood Sustainability Scorecard 2010 Greenpeace Seafood Sustainability Scorecard 1 4 6 NA
Greenpeace Seafood Sustainability Scorecard 2013 Greenpeace Seafood Sustainability Scorecard 0.1 5.4 7.3 NA
Greenpeace Seafood Sustainability Scorecard 2014 Greenpeace Seafood Sustainability Scorecard 1.06 5.6 7.28 NA
Greenpeace Seafood Sustainability Scorecard 2015 Greenpeace Seafood Sustainability Scorecard 1.44 5.47 7.46 NA
Greenpeace Seafood Sustainability Scorecard 2018 Greenpeace Seafood Sustainability Scorecard 60 Yes NA
Global Reporting Initiative 2011 Click here to see the 8 items available from this source
Global Reporting Initiative 2011 Guidelines Non - GRI This field indicates which version of the GRI Guidelines is used for the reporting. As of publication year 2009, GRI only includes reporting that makes use of the G3 Guidelines, which were released in October 2006.
Global Reporting Initiative 2011 Report reference IFC Performance Standards? No NA Yes NA
Global Reporting Initiative 2011 Report reference ISO Standards? No NA Yes NA
Global Reporting Initiative 2011 Country (HQ) NA United States of America NA NA
Global Reporting Initiative 2011 Sector Retailers Industry sector.
Global Reporting Initiative 2011 Declared as NA NA Third-party-checked NA
Global Reporting Initiative 2011 Report Link NA NA NA NA
Global Reporting Initiative 2011 Application Level Undeclared NA A+ G3 Application Levels indicate to which extent the GRI Guidelines have been utilized in the reporting and which set and number of disclosures have been addressed in the reporting. There are three Application Levels A, B and C.
Global Reporting Initiative 2012 Click here to see the 17 items available from this source
Global Reporting Initiative 2012 Status Self-declared GRI-checked Third-party-checked For each G3 Application Level declared, the following statuses can be added: • Self-declared • Third-party-checked • GRI-checked Each reporter should declare an Application Level for their reporting.
Global Reporting Initiative 2012 Guidelines NA GRI - G3 NA NA
Global Reporting Initiative 2012 IFC No No Yes Indicates whether company's report include references to the International Finance Corporation's (IFC) Sustainability Performance Standards
Global Reporting Initiative 2012 ISO NA No NA NA
Global Reporting Initiative 2012 OECD NA No NA NA
Global Reporting Initiative 2012 Size NA MNE NA NA
Global Reporting Initiative 2012 Application Level Undeclared B A+ G3 Application Levels indicate to which extent the GRI Guidelines have been utilized in the reporting and which set and number of disclosures have been addressed in the reporting. There are three Application Levels A, B and C.
Global Reporting Initiative 2012 Country (HQ) NA United States of America NA NA
Global Reporting Initiative 2012 Date Added To Sr List NA 10-05-2012 NA NA
Global Reporting Initiative 2012 Sector Supplements (Final) NA Not Applicable NA NA
Global Reporting Initiative 2012 Region NA Northern America NA NA
Global Reporting Initiative 2012 Report Html Address NA NA NA NA
Global Reporting Initiative 2012 Report Pdf Address NA http://www.walmartstores.com/sites/responsibility-report/2012/pdf/WMT_2012_GRR.pdf NA NA
Global Reporting Initiative 2012 Report reference IFC Performance Standards? NA No NA NA
Global Reporting Initiative 2012 Report reference ISO Standards? No No Yes NA
Global Reporting Initiative 2012 Report Title NA Global Responsibility Report 2011 NA NA
Global Reporting Initiative 2012 Sector NA Retailers NA NA
Global Reporting Initiative 2014 Click here to see the 17 items available from this source
Global Reporting Initiative 2014 Application Level Undeclared B A+ G3 Application Levels indicate to which extent the GRI Guidelines have been utilized in the reporting and which set and number of disclosures have been addressed in the reporting. There are three Application Levels A, B and C, each with the option of decl
Global Reporting Initiative 2014 Country United States of America Country the organization is headquartered in.
Global Reporting Initiative 2014 Date Added To Sr List NA 3-Apr-2014 NA Date added to the GRI list.
Global Reporting Initiative 2014 Guidelines NA GRI - G3.1 NA This field indicates which version of the GRI Guidelines is used for the reporting. As of publication year 2009, GRI only includes reporting that makes use of the G3 Guidelines, which were released in October 2006.
Global Reporting Initiative 2014 IFC No Yes Yes Indicates whether company's report include references to the International Finance Corporation's (IFC) Sustainability Performance Standards
Global Reporting Initiative 2014 Integrated No GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
Global Reporting Initiative 2014 ISO No No Yes Indicates whether company's report include references to ISO Standards
Global Reporting Initiative 2014 OECD NA No NA This field indicates whether the country in which the reporting organization is located is a member of the OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation) or if the country receives assistance from the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). The DAC count
Global Reporting Initiative 2014 Publication Year 2014 GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
Global Reporting Initiative 2014 Region NA Northern America NA Region the organization operates in.
Global Reporting Initiative 2014 Report Html Address NA http://corporate.walmart.com/microsites/global-responsibility-report-2013/ NA URL of the report location.
Global Reporting Initiative 2014 Report Pdf Address NA http://cdn.corporate.walmart.com/39/97/81c4b26546b3913979b260ea0a74/updated-2013-global-responsibility-report_130113953638624649.pdf NA Location of a PDF version of the report.
Global Reporting Initiative 2014 Report Title NA 2013 Global Responsibility Report NA Title of the report.
Global Reporting Initiative 2014 Sector NA Retailers NA Industry sector.
Global Reporting Initiative 2014 Sector Supplements (Final) NA Not Applicable NA This field indicates if the reporting organization has made use of one of the final Sector Supplements and which one. If ‘not used’ is indicated, it means that one of the final Sector Supplements is applicable, but has not been used. If ‘not applicable’ i
Global Reporting Initiative 2014 Type GRI - G3.1 Type of GRI application
Global Reporting Initiative 2014 Size NA MNE NA GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
Global Reporting Initiative 2015 Click here to see the 6 items available from this source
Global Reporting Initiative 2015 Type GRI - Referenced Type of GRI application
Global Reporting Initiative 2015 Country United States of America Country the organization is headquartered in.
Global Reporting Initiative 2015 Publication Year 2015 GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
Global Reporting Initiative 2015 Region Northern America Region the organization operates in.
Global Reporting Initiative 2015 Sector Retailers Industry sector.
Global Reporting Initiative 2015 Size MNE GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
Global Reporting Initiative 2016 Click here to see the 6 items available from this source
Global Reporting Initiative 2016 Size MNE GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
Global Reporting Initiative 2016 Type Non - GRI GRI - G4 GRI - G4 Type of GRI application
Global Reporting Initiative 2016 Publication Year 2016 GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
Global Reporting Initiative 2016 Region Northern America Region the organization operates in.
Global Reporting Initiative 2016 Sector Retailers Industry sector.
Global Reporting Initiative 2016 Country United States of America Country the organization is headquartered in.
Global Reporting Initiative 2017 Click here to see the 9 items available from this source
Global Reporting Initiative 2017 Database link http://database.globalreporting.org/reports/ff3c700e-742f-e711-80eb-3863bb342b20 GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
Global Reporting Initiative 2017 Country United States of America Country the organization is headquartered in.
Global Reporting Initiative 2017 Date Added 2-5-2017 GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
Global Reporting Initiative 2017 Publication Year 2017 GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
Global Reporting Initiative 2017 Region Northern America Region the organization operates in.
Global Reporting Initiative 2017 Sector Retailers Industry sector.
Global Reporting Initiative 2017 Size MNE GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
Global Reporting Initiative 2017 Title 2017 Global Responsibility Report GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
Global Reporting Initiative 2017 Type GRI - G4 Type of GRI application
Global Reporting Initiative 2018 Click here to see the 5 items available from this source
Global Reporting Initiative 2018 Country United States of America Country the organization is headquartered in.
Global Reporting Initiative 2018 Database link http://database.globalreporting.org/reports/c4c9813f-4cc4-e811-8152-e0071b6641b1 GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
Global Reporting Initiative 2018 Publication Year 2018 GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
Global Reporting Initiative 2018 Title 2018 Global Responsibility Report GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
Global Reporting Initiative 2018 Type Non - GRI GRI-Standards GRI - G4 Type of GRI application
Global Reporting Initiative 2019 Click here to see the 5 items available from this source
Global Reporting Initiative 2019 Title 2019 Global Responsibility Report GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
Global Reporting Initiative 2019 Type GRI-Standards Type of GRI application
Global Reporting Initiative 2019 Country United States of America Country the organization is headquartered in.
Global Reporting Initiative 2019 Database link http://database.globalreporting.org/reports/d3c27d3a-f6c1-e911-a964-000d3ab6488a GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
Global Reporting Initiative 2019 Publication Year 2019 GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
Grab Your Wallet Click here to see the 19 items available from this source
Grab Your Wallet Corporate HQ Phone # 1-479-273-6463 (investor relations) NA
Grab Your Wallet Customer Service Phone # 1 (800) 925-6278 NA
Grab Your Wallet Voted Against Jan 6 Commission Yes Yes
Grab Your Wallet Email https://www.walmart.com/search/?query=ivanka NA
Grab Your Wallet Email / Email Contact Form https://corporate.walmart.com/contact-us/store-corporate-feedback NA
Grab Your Wallet PR Contact Info & More (Info Gathered From Publicly Available Sources) http://corporate.walmart.com/contact-us/contact-media-relations NA
Grab Your Wallet Recommended Action to be Considered for Removal from Boycott List Stop selling Trump brand goods NA
Grab Your Wallet Which Products? shoes, clothing, fragrance NA
Grab Your Wallet Why Specifically Is It On the List? Carries Ivanka Trump products
Grab Your Wallet Boycottability (1 = least, 5 = most) 4 NA
Grab Your Wallet Date of Last Online Inventory Check 1/13/2017 NA
Grab Your Wallet Is on the list? Yes NA
Grab Your Wallet PR Contact (From Publicly Available Sources) http://corporate.walmart.com/contact-us/contact-media-relations NA
Grab Your Wallet Recommended Action to be Removed from This List Stop selling Trump brand goods NA
Grab Your Wallet Twitter Handle @Walmart NA
Grab Your Wallet Type Retailer (General) NA
Grab Your Wallet # of Items Stocked (last check 4/8/17) 0 0 464 NA
Grab Your Wallet Company Type Retailer that Sells Trump Family Products
Grab Your Wallet Why Is It On the List? Carries Trump Products NA
Hispanic Magazine 100 list Corporate 100 (Hispanic Magazine) NA Yes Yes NA
Human Rights Campaign 2011 List HRC Rating 0 40 100 NA
Human Rights Campaign 2012 List HRC Rating 2012 -25 60 100 NA
ICCR Proxy Engagement 2020 Click here to see the 6 items available from this source
ICCR Proxy Engagement 2020 Count of Resolutions 6 5 1 The count of ICCR members' resolutions.
ICCR Proxy Engagement 2020 Resolution Challenged 1 ICCR members' current shareholder resolutions that have been Challenged.
ICCR Proxy Engagement 2020 Resolution Omitted 1 NA ICCR members' current shareholder resolutions that have been Omitted.
ICCR Proxy Engagement 2020 Resolution Pending 5 4 1 ICCR members' current shareholder resolutions which status is Pending.
ICCR Proxy Engagement 2020 Resolution Withdrawn 3 NA 1 ICCR members' current shareholder resolutions that have been Withdrawn.
ICCR Proxy Engagement 2020 Resolutions List Feasibility of Paid Sick Leave as a Standard Employee BenefitGender and Racial Pay EquityLobbying Expenditures DisclosureReduce Plastics UseStarting Pay and Racial Equity The list of ICCR members' resolutions.
InfluenceMap Click here to see the 5 items available from this source
InfluenceMap Influence Map ID 20
InfluenceMap Organisational Score 13.4 61.5 94.2 NA
InfluenceMap Relationship Score 0.0 35.5 46.8 NA
InfluenceMap Total Score 17.7 54.8 78.1 NA
InfluenceMap URL NA NA
Investis IQ Click here to see the 10 items available from this source
Investis IQ Corporate Social Responsibility 0 67 89 NA
Investis IQ Country HQ the United States
Investis IQ Country Listed the United States NA
Investis IQ Index S&P 100
Investis IQ ISIN NO US9311421039
Investis IQ Most Recent Scored Date Q32015
Investis IQ Overall 12 60 79 NA
Investis IQ Sector Retail
Investis IQ Index Rank 209 5 1 NA
Investis IQ Previous Rank 220 10 1 NA
ISOS Group Sustainability Reporting Assessments Click here to see the 32 items available from this source
ISOS Group Sustainability Reporting Assessments Economic Integrity 2016 12 Economic Integrity
ISOS Group Sustainability Reporting Assessments Commitment 49 Commitment
ISOS Group Sustainability Reporting Assessments Comparability 2016 0.5 Comparability
ISOS Group Sustainability Reporting Assessments Completeness 2016 0.5 Completeness
ISOS Group Sustainability Reporting Assessments Environmental protection policies 1.78 2.4 3.6
ISOS Group Sustainability Reporting Assessments CONTENT 17 Content
ISOS Group Sustainability Reporting Assessments Materiality (External Factors) 0.5 0.5 2.0 The information in a report should cover topics and Indicators that: • reflect the organization’s significant economic, environmental, and social impacts or that • would substantively influence the assessments and decisions of stakeholders.
ISOS Group Sustainability Reporting Assessments Commitment to Society and to Human Rights Protection Policies 1.45 1.51 3.91
ISOS Group Sustainability Reporting Assessments Comparability 0.36 0.56 2.0 Coverage of the material topics and Indicators and definition of the report boundary should be sufficient to reflect significant economic, environmental, and social impacts and enable stakeholders to assess the reporting organization’s performance.
ISOS Group Sustainability Reporting Assessments Timeliness 2016 0.5 Timeliness
ISOS Group Sustainability Reporting Assessments Economic Integrity 1.9 1.9 3.61
ISOS Group Sustainability Reporting Assessments Completeness 0.2 0.2 2.0 Coverage of the material topics and Indicators and definition of the report boundary should be sufficient to reflect significant economic, environmental, and social impacts and enable stakeholders to assess the reporting organization’s performance.
ISOS Group Sustainability Reporting Assessments Reliability 2016 4 Reliability
ISOS Group Sustainability Reporting Assessments Society/HR 16 Society & Human Rights
ISOS Group Sustainability Reporting Assessments Environment 21 Environment
ISOS Group Sustainability Reporting Assessments Stakeholder 1.75 Relevance to stakeholders
ISOS Group Sustainability Reporting Assessments Sust_con 5 Sustainability Context
ISOS Group Sustainability Reporting Assessments CONT_QUAL 28.25 Content Quality
ISOS Group Sustainability Reporting Assessments Mat_I 7.25 Internal Materiality
ISOS Group Sustainability Reporting Assessments Balance 2016 0 1 6 Balance
ISOS Group Sustainability Reporting Assessments Clarity 2016 0 4 8 Clarity
ISOS Group Sustainability Reporting Assessments Accuracy 2016 0 2 12 Accuracy
ISOS Group Sustainability Reporting Assessments Materiality (Internal Factors) 0.87 0.87 2.0 The information in a report should cover topics and Indicators that: • reflect the organization’s significant economic, environmental, and social impacts or that • would substantively influence the assessments and decisions of stakeholders.
ISOS Group Sustainability Reporting Assessments Reliability 0.33 0.33 2.0 Information and processes used in the preparation of a report should be gathered, recorded, compiled, analyzed, and disclosed in a way that could be subject to examination and that establishes the quality and materiality of the information
ISOS Group Sustainability Reporting Assessments Stakeholder Inclusiveness 0.3 0.3 2.0 The reporting organization should identify its stakeholders and explain in the report how it has responded to their reasonable expectations and interests.
ISOS Group Sustainability Reporting Assessments Sustainability Context 0.88 1.04 2.0 The report should present the organization’s performance in the wider context of sustainability
ISOS Group Sustainability Reporting Assessments Timeliness 0.76 1.2 2.0 Reporting occurs on a regular schedule and information is available in time for stakeholders to make informed decisions.
ISOS Group Sustainability Reporting Assessments Mat_E 2.5 External Materiality
ISOS Group Sustainability Reporting Assessments Accuracy 0.33 0.33 2.0 The reported information should be sufficiently accurate and detailed for stakeholders to assess the reporting organization’s performance.
ISOS Group Sustainability Reporting Assessments Balance 0.53 0.53 2.0 The report should reflect positive and negative aspects of the organization’s performance to enable a reasoned assessment of overall performance.
ISOS Group Sustainability Reporting Assessments Clarity 0.8 0.8 2.0 Information should be made available in a manner that is understandable and accessible to stakeholders using the report
ISOS Group Sustainability Reporting Assessments QUALITY 11.25 Quality
Just 100 2021 Click here to see the 2 items available from this source
Just 100 2021 Rank 100 50 1 America's Best Corporate Citizens List
Just 100 2021 State Arkansas
Just 100 2023 Rank 100 44 1 America's Best Corporate Citizens List
JUST Jobs Policy Tracker Click here to see the 10 items available from this source
JUST Jobs Policy Tracker Parental Leave Policy No Yes Yes
JUST Jobs Policy Tracker Pay Equity Policy No No Yes
JUST Jobs Policy Tracker PTO Policy No Partial Yes
JUST Jobs Policy Tracker Rank 890 214 1
JUST Jobs Policy Tracker Tuition Policy No No Yes
JUST Jobs Policy Tracker Career Dev Policy No Yes Yes
JUST Jobs Policy Tracker Day Care Services No Yes Yes
JUST Jobs Policy Tracker Diversity Policy No Yes Yes
JUST Jobs Policy Tracker Diversity Targets No No Yes
JUST Jobs Policy Tracker Flexible Work Policy No Yes Yes
Know The Chain Click here to see the 42 items available from this source
Know The Chain Year of inclusion 2018 Year of inclusion of analysed company
Know The Chain Traceability and Supply Chain Transparency 0 0 100 Includes the names and addresses of its first-tier suppliers
Know The Chain Training 0 45 100 Trains all relevant decision-makers within the company on risks and policies that address forced labor and human trafficking
Know The Chain Public Note NA Comments on any public note about the statement
Know The Chain Commitment 0 100 100 The company publicly demonstrates its commitment to addressing forced labor and human trafficking.
Know The Chain Corrective Action Plans 75 A corrective action process for its suppliers and potential actions taken in cases of non-compliance, such as stop-work notices, warning letters, supplementary training, and policy revision
Know The Chain Sector Consumer Staples The company's industry sector
Know The Chain Statement http://corporate.walmart.com/global-responsibility/ethical-sourcing/california-transparency-in-supply-chains-act The company's statement location
Know The Chain Statement--Trasparency No Yes Yes Companies with a posted statement addressing at least three of the five SB-657 requirements are awarded a check mark.
Know The Chain 1. Commitment & Governance 0 75 1 1. Commitment & Governance Score
Know The Chain 2. Traceability and Risk Assessment 0 38 1 2. Traceability and Risk Assessment of analysed company
Know The Chain Worker Engagement 0 25 100 Takes steps to ensure its supply chain policies that address forced labor and human trafficking are communicated to workers in its supply chains
Know The Chain Date Statement Verified 7/15/2013 Date of verification by Know The Chain
Know The Chain Industry Hypermarkets and Super Centers The company's industry sector
Know The Chain Country United States Country of analysed company
Know The Chain Freedom of Association 0 Works with independent local or global trade unions to support freedom of association in its supply chains
Know The Chain Grievance Mechanism 0 60 90 Takes steps to ensure a formal mechanism to report a grievance to an impartial entity regarding labor conditions in the company's supply chains is available to its suppliers' workers and their legitimate representatives
Know The Chain Integration into Supplier Contracts 0 15 45 Integrates the ILO core labor standards, which include the elimination of forced labor, into supplier contracts
Know The Chain Management and Accountability 0 59 100 Has a committee, team, program, or officer responsible for the implementation of its supply chain policies that address forced labor and human trafficking.
Know The Chain Market Cap in US$ bn 315.7899 Year of inclusion of analysed company
Know The Chain Monitoring and Responsible Recruitment 0 75 100 Takes steps to ensure employment and/or recruitment agencies used by its suppliers are monitored to assess and address risks of forced labor and human trafficking
Know The Chain Monitoring Disclosure 0 30 100 Includes the percentage of suppliers monitored annually
Know The Chain Monitoring Process 0 80 100 Includes non-scheduled visits, a review of relevant documents
Know The Chain Purchasing Practices 0 13 100 The company is taking steps toward responsible raw materials sourcing
Know The Chain Rank 2020 49 12 1 Rank 2020 Score
Know The Chain Recruitment Approach 0 30 100 Has a policy that requires direct employment in its supply chains
Know The Chain Recruitment Fees 0 75 100 Requires that no worker in its supply chains should pay for a job—the costs of recruitment
Know The Chain Region North America Year of inclusion of analysed company
Know The Chain Remedy Programs 0 25 100 A process for responding to potential complaints and/or reported violations of policies that address forced labor and human trafficking
Know The Chain Rights of Workers in Vulnerable Conditions 0 30 100 Takes steps to ensure migrant workers in its supply chains understand the terms and conditions of their recruitment and employment and also understand their rights
Know The Chain Risk Assessment 0 69 100 Includes details on how it conducts human rights supply chain risk or impact assessments that include forced labor risks or assessments that focus specifically on forced labor risks
Know The Chain Stakeholder Engagement 0 75 100 Providing at least two examples of engagements on forced labor and human trafficking with stakeholders such as policy makers, worker rights organizations, or local NGOs in countries in which its first-tier suppliers and suppliers below the first tier oper
Know The Chain Supplier Code of Conduct 0 59 100 Requires suppliers to respect the ILO core labor standards, which include the elimination of forced labor.
Know The Chain Supplier Selection 0 0 100 Assesses risks of forced labor at potential suppliers before entering into any contracts with them and discloses details on the outcomes of this process
Know The Chain Total 2020 0.0 46.3 69.9 Total 2020 Score
Know The Chain Market Cap 387.816 Year of inclusion of analysed company
Know The Chain Website http://www.walmart.com The company's web site
Know The Chain 3. Purchasing Practices 0 26 1 3. Purchasing Practices of the company
Know The Chain 4. Recruitment 0 53 1 4. Recruitment Score
Know The Chain 5. Worker Voice 0 28 1 5. Worker Voice of the company
Know The Chain 6. Monitoring 0 55 1 6. Monitoring Score
Know The Chain 7. Remedy 0 50 1 7. Remedy Score
Latina Style 2009 Latina Style 50 NA Yes Yes NA
Latina Style 2008 Latina Style 50 for 2008 NA Yes Yes NA
Latina Style 50 2010 Latina Style 50 2010 50 0 1 Latina Style 50 best companies for Latinas in 2010
Latina Style 50 2011 Latina Style 50 2011 50 0 1 Latina Style 50 best companies for Latinas in 2011
Latina Style 50 2013 Latina Style 50 2013 50 0 1 Latina Style 50 best companies for Latinas in 2011
Latina Style 50 2014 Latina Style 50 2014 Yes Yes Latina Style 50 best companies for Latinas in 2014
Latina Style 50 2016 Latina Style 50 2016 50 0 1 Latina Style 50 best companies for Latinas in 2016
Latina Style 50 2017 Latina Style 50 2017 Yes Latina Style 50 best companies for Latinas in 2017
100 Low Carbon Pioneers 100 Low Carbon Pioneers 100 2 1 NA
NAFE Top 50-2010 Supports and promotes woman employees NA Yes Yes Each organization completed a detailed application covering both internal and external programs and activities that benefit women.
NAFE Top 50-2011 Supports and promotes woman employees--2011 List NA Yes Yes NA
NAFE Top 50-2012 Supports and promotes woman employees Yes Yes Each organization completed a detailed application covering both internal and external programs and activities that benefit women.
NAFE Top 50-2014 Supports and promotes woman employees Yes Yes Each organization completed a detailed application covering both internal and external programs and activities that benefit women.
NAFE Top 50-2015 Supports and promotes woman employees Yes Yes Each organization completed a detailed application covering both internal and external programs and activities that benefit women.
NAFE Top 50-2016 Supports and promotes woman employees Yes Yes Each organization completed a detailed application covering both internal and external programs and activities that benefit women.
NAFE Top 60-2017 Supports and promotes woman employees Yes Yes Each organization completed a detailed application covering both internal and external programs and activities that benefit women.
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2010 Click here to see the 4 items available from this source
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2010 Newsweek Green Policies and Performance 1.0 55.24 100.0 NA
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2010 Rank 51 Overall Rank
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2010 Newsweek Reputation 1.0 92.15 100.0 NA
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2010 Newsweek Environmental Impact 1.0 49.11 100.0 NA
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2009 Click here to see the 4 items available from this source
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2009 Newsweek Environmental Impact 59.2 Measure of impact of this company on the environment.
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2009 Newsweek Green Policies and Performance 41.06 Measure of green policy position.
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2009 Newsweek Reputation 100 Measure of the company's reputation among CSR professionals.
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2009 Rank 59 Overall Rank
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2011 Click here to see the 5 items available from this source
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2011 Envtl. Mgmt. 26.7 66.9 96.2 Based on an analysis of companies tracked in Sustainalytics’ Global Platform, the Environmental Management Score is an assessment of how a company manages its environmental performance through policies, programs, targets, certifications, and the like.
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2011 Disclosure 0.0 56.5 99.6 For the first time this year, environmental disclosure was included as a stand-alone score to assess each company’s transparency with regard to its environmental performance.
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2011 Envtl. Impact 0.2 63.8 88.5 Based on data compiled by Trucost, this is a comprehensive, quantitative, and standardized measurement of the overall environmental impact of a company’s global operations. More than 700 metrics—including emissions of nine key greenhouse gases, water use,
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2011 Green Score 19.9 64.4 82.5 This score is derived from three component scores: an Environmental Impact Score, an Environmental Management Score, and an Environmental Disclosure Score; weighted at 45 percent, 45 percent, and 10 percent, respectively.
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2011 Rank 1 52 500 Overall rank on the Newsweek US Green Ranking
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2012 Click here to see the 6 items available from this source
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2012 Industry Rank 5 Overall rank on the Newsweek US Green Ranking
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2012 Disclosure 0.0 75.8 100.0 Environmental disclosure was included as a stand-alone score to assess each company’s transparency with regard to its environmental performance. Specifically, this score evaluates the breadth and quality of company environmen
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2012 Envtl. Impact 0.0 64.5 89.0 Based on data compiled by Trucost, this is a comprehensive, quantitative, and standardized measurement of the overall environmental impact of a company’s global operations. More than 700 metrics—including emissions of nine key greenhouse gases, water use,
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2012 Green Score 21.4 68.0 82.9 NA
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2012 Rank 53 41 1 NA
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2012 Envtl. Mgmt. 21.3 69.8 91.9 Based on an analysis of companies tracked in Sustainalytics’ Global Platform, the Environmental Management Score is an assessment of how a company manages its environmental performance through policies, programs, targets, certifications, and the like. To
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2013 Click here to see the 9 items available from this source
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2013 Rank 500 245 1
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2013 Water Productivity 0.028 0.493 0.992 Water Productivity is defined as Revenue ($US) / Total water use (m3).
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2013 Audit No Yes Yes The company provides evidence that the latest reported environmental metrics are audited by a third party.
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2013 Reputation 0.005 0.01 1.0 The Reputation score is made up of two components: (1) The RepRisk Index, which is a quantitative measure that captures criticism and quantifies a company exposure to ESG risks. (2) The second component is based on the number of environmental issues that
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2013 Sustainability Themed Committee No Yes Yes The existence of a committee at the Board of Directors level whose mandate is related to the sustainability of the company, including but not limited to environmental matters.
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2013 Carbon Productivity 0.003 0.459 0.97 GHG Productivity defined as Revenue ($US) / Total Greenhouse gas (GHG) Emissions (CO2e).
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2013 Energy Productivity 0.021 0.312 0.971 Energy Productivity defined as Revenue ($US) / Total Energy Consumption (GJ).
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2013 Newsweek Green Score 0.014 0.291 0.851 This score is derived from the following component scores: an Energy Productivity,Carbon Productivity, Water Productivity, Waste Productivity, Reputation, Pay Link, Sustainability Themed Committee, Audit ; weighted at 45 percent, 45 percent, and 10 percen
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2013 Pay Link No No Yes A mechanism to link the remuneration of any member of a company's senior executive team with the achievement of environmental performance targets.
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2015 Click here to see the 10 items available from this source
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2015 Green Revenue 0% 10% 20% NA
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2015 Carbon Productivity 0% 4% 15% GHG Productivity defined as Revenue ($US) / Total Greenhouse gas (GHG) Emissions (CO2e).
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2015 Energy Productivity 0% 2% 15% Energy Productivity defined as Revenue ($US) / Total Energy Consumption (GJ).
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2015 Sustainability Themed Committee 0% 5% 5% The existence of a committee at the Board of Directors level whose mandate is related to the sustainability of the company, including but not limited to environmental matters.
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2015 Waste Productivity 0% 0% 15% Waste Productivity is defined as Revenue ($US) / [Total waste generated (metric tonnes) – waste recycled/reused (metric tonnes)].
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2015 Water Productivity 0% 2% 15% Water Productivity is defined as Revenue ($US) / Total water use (m3).
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2015 Newsweek Green Score 0.0% 38.6% 84.2% This score is derived from the following component scores: an Energy Productivity,Carbon Productivity, Water Productivity, Waste Productivity, Reputation, Pay Link, Sustainability Themed Committee, Audit ; weighted at 45 percent, 45 percent, and 10 percen
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2015 Rank 500 206 1 NA
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2015 Sustainability Pay Link 0% 10% 10% A mechanism to link the remuneration of any member of a company's senior executive team with the achievement of environmental performance targets.
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2015 Audit Score 0% 5% 5% The company provides evidence that the latest reported environmental metrics are audited by a third party.
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2016 Click here to see the 10 items available from this source
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2016 Sustainability Themed Committee 0% 5% 5% The existence of a committee at the Board of Directors level whose mandate is related to the sustainability of the company, including but not limited to environmental matters.
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2016 Waste Productivity 0% 0% 15% Waste Productivity is defined as Revenue ($US) / [Total waste generated (metric tonnes) – waste recycled/reused (metric tonnes)].
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2016 Water Productivity 0% 0% 15% Water Productivity is defined as Revenue ($US) / Total water use (m3).
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2016 Green Revenue 0% 12% 20% NA
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2016 Newsweek Green Score 1.0% 38.4% 88.1% This score is derived from the following component scores: an Energy Productivity,Carbon Productivity, Water Productivity, Waste Productivity, Reputation, Pay Link, Sustainability Themed Committee, Audit ; weighted at 45 percent, 45 percent, and 10 percen
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2016 Rank 500 184 1 NA
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2016 Sustainability Pay Link 0% 10% 10% A mechanism to link the remuneration of any member of a company's senior executive team with the achievement of environmental performance targets.
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2016 Audit Score 0% 5% 5% The company provides evidence that the latest reported environmental metrics are audited by a third party.
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2016 Carbon Productivity 0% 6% 15% GHG Productivity defined as Revenue ($US) / Total Greenhouse gas (GHG) Emissions (CO2e).
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2016 Energy Productivity 0% 0% 15% Energy Productivity defined as Revenue ($US) / Total Energy Consumption (GJ).
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2017 Click here to see the 4 items available from this source
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2017 Country United States of America NA
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2017 GICS Sector Consumer Staples NA
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2017 Newsweek Green Score 0.0 40.2 83.7 Sustainability performance is measured using all key environmental performance indicators (KPI), which are disclosed by at least 10% of industry peer group companies.
Newsweek Top 500 Green Companies 2017 Rank 500 114 1 Overall Rank
Newsweek Top 300 Green Companies 2019 Click here to see the 6 items available from this source
Newsweek Top 300 Green Companies 2019 Corporate Governance 40 76 100
Newsweek Top 300 Green Companies 2019 Environmental Score 28 58 100
Newsweek Top 300 Green Companies 2019 Rank 300 168 1
Newsweek Top 300 Green Companies 2019 Score 60 69 94
Newsweek Top 300 Green Companies 2019 Social Score 41 75 100
Newsweek Top 300 Green Companies 2019 State NA
Newsweek Top 100 Global Green Companies 2010 Click here to see the 3 items available from this source
Newsweek Top 100 Global Green Companies 2010 Newsweek Global Green Policies and Performance 1.0 59.36 100.0 NA
Newsweek Top 100 Global Green Companies 2010 Newsweek Global Reputation 1.0 89.61 100.0 NA
Newsweek Top 100 Global Green Companies 2010 Newsweek Global Environmental Impact 1.0 38.92 100.0 NA
Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2011 Click here to see the 5 items available from this source
Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2011 Envtl. Mgmt. 28.7 66.9 96.2 Based on an analysis of companies tracked in Sustainalytics’ Global Platform, the Environmental Management Score is an assessment of how a company manages its environmental performance through policies, programs, targets, certifications, and the like.
Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2011 Envtl. Impact 0.2 63.8 88.2 Based on data compiled by Trucost, this is a comprehensive, quantitative, and standardized measurement of the overall environmental impact of a company’s global operations. More than 700 metrics—including emissions of nine key greenhouse gases, water use,
Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2011 Green Score 17.5 64.4 83.6 This score is derived from three component scores: an Environmental Impact Score, an Environmental Management Score, and an Environmental Disclosure Score; weighted at 45 percent, 45 percent, and 10 percent, respectively.
Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2011 Rank 500 124 1 Overall rank on the Newsweek Global Green Ranking
Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2011 Disclosure 0.0 56.5 99.9 For the first time this year, environmental disclosure was included as a stand-alone score to assess each company’s transparency with regard to its environmental performance.
Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2012 Click here to see the 5 items available from this source
Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2012 Envtl. Mgmt. 28.6 69.8 91.9 Based on an analysis of companies tracked in Sustainalytics’ Global Platform, the Environmental Management Score is an assessment of how a company manages its environmental performance through policies, programs, targets, certifications, and the like. To
Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2012 Rank 500 99 1 NA
Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2012 Disclosure 0.0 75.8 100.0 Environmental disclosure was included as a stand-alone score to assess each company’s transparency with regard to its environmental performance. Specifically, this score evaluates the breadth and quality of company environmen
Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2012 Envtl. Impact 11.3 64.5 87.3 Based on data compiled by Trucost, this is a comprehensive, quantitative, and standardized measurement of the overall environmental impact of a company’s global operations. More than 700 metrics—including emissions of nine key greenhouse gases, water use,
Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2012 Green Score 0.0 68.0 100.0 NA
Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2013 Click here to see the 9 items available from this source
Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2013 Energy Productivity 0.007 0.312 0.957 Energy Productivity defined as Revenue ($US) / Total Energy Consumption (GJ).
Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2013 Carbon Productivity 0.015 0.459 0.963 GHG Productivity defined as Revenue ($US) / Total Greenhouse gas (GHG) Emissions (CO2e).
Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2013 Audit No Yes Yes The company provides evidence that the latest reported environmental metrics are audited by a third party.
Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2013 Newsweek Green Score 0.0 0.291 0.843 This score is derived from the following component scores: an Energy Productivity,Carbon Productivity, Water Productivity, Waste Productivity, Reputation, Pay Link, Sustainability Themed Committee, Audit ; weighted at 45 percent, 45 percent, and 10 percen
Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2013 Pay Link No No Yes A mechanism to link the remuneration of any member of a company's senior executive team with the achievement of environmental performance targets.
Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2013 Rank 500 337 1
Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2013 Reputation 0.005 0.01 1.0 The Reputation score is made up of two components: (1) The RepRisk Index, which is a quantitative measure that captures criticism and quantifies a company exposure to ESG risks. (2) The second component is based on the number of environmental issues that
Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2013 Sustainability Themed Committee No Yes Yes The existence of a committee at the Board of Directors level whose mandate is related to the sustainability of the company, including but not limited to environmental matters.
Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2013 Water Productivity 0.012 0.493 0.992 Water Productivity is defined as Revenue ($US) / Total water use (m3).
Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2015 Click here to see the 10 items available from this source
Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2015 Rank 500 299 1 NA
Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2015 Newsweek Green Score 0.4% 38.8% 89.2% This score is derived from the following component scores: an Energy Productivity,Carbon Productivity, Water Productivity, Waste Productivity, Reputation, Pay Link, Sustainability Themed Committee, Audit ; weighted at 45 percent, 45 percent, and 10 percen
Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2015 Audit Score 0% 5% 5% The company provides evidence that the latest reported environmental metrics are audited by a third party.
Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2015 Sustainability Pay Link 0% 10% 10% A mechanism to link the remuneration of any member of a company's senior executive team with the achievement of environmental performance targets.
Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2015 Sustainability Themed Committee 0% 5% 5% The existence of a committee at the Board of Directors level whose mandate is related to the sustainability of the company, including but not limited to environmental matters.
Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2015 Waste Productivity 0% 0% 15% Waste Productivity is defined as Revenue ($US) / [Total waste generated (metric tonnes) – waste recycled/reused (metric tonnes)].
Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2015 Carbon Productivity 0% 7% 15% GHG Productivity defined as Revenue ($US) / Total Greenhouse gas (GHG) Emissions (CO2e).
Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2015 Energy Productivity 0% 0% 15% Energy Productivity defined as Revenue ($US) / Total Energy Consumption (GJ).
Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2015 Green Revenue 0% 12% 20% NA
Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2015 Water Productivity 0% 0% 15% Water Productivity is defined as Revenue ($US) / Total water use (m3).
Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2016 Click here to see the 10 items available from this source
Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2016 Sustainability Pay Link 0% 10% 10% A mechanism to link the remuneration of any member of a company's senior executive team with the achievement of environmental performance targets.
Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2016 Sustainability Themed Committee 0% 5% 5% The existence of a committee at the Board of Directors level whose mandate is related to the sustainability of the company, including but not limited to environmental matters.
Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2016 Waste Productivity 0% 0% 15% Waste Productivity is defined as Revenue ($US) / [Total waste generated (metric tonnes) – waste recycled/reused (metric tonnes)].
Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2016 Audit Score 0% 5% 5% The company provides evidence that the latest reported environmental metrics are audited by a third party.
Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2016 Carbon Productivity 0% 6% 15% GHG Productivity defined as Revenue ($US) / Total Greenhouse gas (GHG) Emissions (CO2e).
Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2016 Energy Productivity 0% 0% 15% Energy Productivity defined as Revenue ($US) / Total Energy Consumption (GJ).
Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2016 Green Revenue 0% 12% 20% NA
Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2016 Newsweek Green Score 4.7% 38.4% 87.7% This score is derived from the following component scores: an Energy Productivity,Carbon Productivity, Water Productivity, Waste Productivity, Reputation, Pay Link, Sustainability Themed Committee, Audit ; weighted at 45 percent, 45 percent, and 10 percen
Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2016 Rank 500 280 1 NA
Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2016 Water Productivity 0% 0% 15% Water Productivity is defined as Revenue ($US) / Total water use (m3).
Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2017 Click here to see the 4 items available from this source
Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2017 Newsweek Green Score 0.0 40.2 89.9 Sustainability performance is measured using all key environmental performance indicators (KPI), which are disclosed by at least 10% of industry peer group companies.
Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2017 Rank 500 199 1 Overall Rank
Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2017 Country United States of America NA
Newsweek Top 500 Global Green Companies 2017 GICS Sector Consumer Staples NA
National Hispanic Corporate Council National Hispanic Corporate Council (NHCC) member Yes Yes National Hispanic Corporate Council (NHCC) member.
NIRAPON Member? Yes Yes NIRAPON members share a common goal of maintaining high safety standards and management systems in our supplying factories in Bangladesh.
National Minority Supplier Development Council Member? Yes Yes National Minority Supplier Development Council Corporate Members
National Veteran Business Development Council (NVBDC) NVBDC Member Yes Yes Certified veteran owned business.
Oceana's Red and Green List Oceana's Red and Green lists of stores that post information on mercury No No Yes NA
Omni50 2017 OMNI 50 2017 2 Rank on a list of companies selected as the most diverse by Diversity Business.
Omni50 2018 OMNI 50 2018 50 2 1 Rank on a list of companies selected as the most diverse by Diversity Business.
Omni50 2019 OMNI 50 2019 50 2 1 Rank on a list of companies selected as the most diverse by Diversity Business.
Omni50 2020 OMNI 50 2020 50 3 1 Rank on a list of companies selected as the most diverse by Diversity Business.
NASDAQ OMX CRD Global Sustainability Index NASDAQ OMX CRD Global Sustainability Index NA Yes Yes The NASDAQ OMX CRD Global Sustainability Index is an equally weighted equity index that serves as a benchmark for stocks of companies that are taking a leadership role in sustainability performance reporting and are traded on a major US stock exchange. Th
The Rainforest Alliance Certified? Yes Yes The Rainforest Alliance Certified green frog seal is awarded to farms, forests, and tourism businesses that meet rigorous environmental and social standards.
RE100 List of the most influential businesses committed to 100% renewable electricity Yes List of the most influential businesses committed to 100% renewable electricity
ReportWatch Click here to see the 5 items available from this source
ReportWatch Rating B- REPORTWATCH RATING
ReportWatch Country U.S. REPORTWATCH RATING
ReportWatch Rank 400 0 1 REPORTWATCH RATING
ReportWatch Report Rating D B A REPORTWATCH RATING
ReportWatch Compare e.g. CARREFOUR NA
Reputation Institute Click here to see the 11 items available from this source
Reputation Institute RepTrak® BrandStrength 63.9981 NA
Reputation Institute RepTrak® CSR Index 58.0402 NA
Reputation Institute Valid N 105.9 NA
Reputation Institute Workplace 54.6001 NA
Reputation Institute Products 67.8822 NA
Reputation Institute Citizenship 60.0293 NA
Reputation Institute Governance 60.0075 NA
Reputation Institute Innovation 65.5475 NA
Reputation Institute Leadership 66.2025 NA
Reputation Institute Performance 69.3306 NA
Reputation Institute Pulse 68.2043 NA
Responsible Minerals Initiative Responsible Minerals Initiative Member Yes Yes The Responsible Minerals Initiative is one of the most utilized and respected resources for companies from a range of industries addressing responsible mineral sourcing issues in their supply chains.
Reputation Quotient Click here to see the 2 items available from this source
Reputation Quotient Rank 60 79 1 The rank within this year's RQ.
Reputation Quotient RQ 48.18 66.9 85.64 The Annual RQ is an assessment tool that captures perceptions of corporate reputations across industries, among multiple audiences, and is adaptable to countries outside the United States, grouped into six dimensions of reputation: Products & Services, Fi
Responsible Sourcing Network Mining the Disclosures 2018 Conflict Minerals Performance Rating (<40) (<40) (90+) Mining the Disclosures 2018 aims to provide investors and other stakeholders with a comparative year-on-year analysis of the largest companies’ efforts to disclose and address their use, and associated risks, linked to conflict minerals in the DRC region.
Sustainable Apparel Coalition Members of Sustainable Apparel Coation Yes Yes NA
SASB Reporter Click here to see the 3 items available from this source
SASB Reporter Number of Reports 1 1 5 Number of places that referred to SASB.
SASB Reporter Number of Years 1 1 4 Number of years of SASB references.
SASB Reporter Referred to SASB Yes Yes At least one report referred to SASB for 2015-2019
Sustainable Brands Members Sustainable Brands Member Yes Yes The Sustainable Brands Member Network is the leading peer-to-peer, learning and networking group.
Science Based Targets Initiative Click here to see the 18 items available from this source
Science Based Targets Initiative SECTOR Food and Staples Retailing Sector of the company committed.
Science Based Targets Initiative STATUS Committed Targets Set Targets Set A company has a status "Commited" after submitting a letter establishing its intent to set a science-based target. A company has a status "Targets set" after its targets are validated and approved by SBT team.
Science Based Targets Initiative TARGET CLASSIFICATION NA 1.5°C Well-below 2°C The targets covering greenhouse gas emissions from company operations (scopes 1 and 2) are consistent with reductions required to keep warming to 1.5°C, well below 2°C or 2°C.
Science Based Targets Initiative Committed to Business Ambition for 1.5 NA Yes Yes A company is committed to setting the targets covering greenhouse gas emissions from company operations (scopes 1 and 2) that are consistent with reductions required to keep warming to 1.5°C
Science Based Targets Initiative DATE 01/11/2016 Date of establishing a commitment to set a science-based target.
Science Based Targets Initiative LOCATION United States of America (USA) Location of the company committed.
Science Based Targets Initiative REGION North America Region of the company committed.
Science Based Targets Initiative BA1.5 Date 01/04/2021
Science Based Targets Initiative Country United States of America (USA)
Science Based Targets Initiative Long term - Target Classification NA
Science Based Targets Initiative Long term - Target Status NA
Science Based Targets Initiative Long term - Target Year NA
Science Based Targets Initiative Near term - Target Year 2025, 2030
Science Based Targets Initiative Net-Zero Committed Yes
Science Based Targets Initiative Net-Zero Year NA
Science Based Targets Initiative Organization Type Company
Science Based Targets Initiative Target Walmart commits to reduce absolute scopes 1 and 2 GHG emissions 35% by 2025 and 65% by 2030 from a 2015 base year. Walmart will also work to reduce CO2e emissions from upstream and downstream scope 3 sources by one billion tonnes between by 2030 from a 20
Science Based Targets Initiative Target Classification ext The targets covering greenhouse gas emissions from company operations (scopes 1 and 2) are consistent with reductions required to keep warming to 1.5°C.
Sustainable Packaging Coalition Sustainable Packaging Coalition member NA Yes Yes NA
SRI-Connect Value Yes Yes A member of the marketplace
Stocksnips Click here to see the 2 items available from this source
Stocksnips esg_rank_decile 5 -1 1
Stocksnips trading_day 0
Top Diversity Employers for Hispanics 2010 Top Diversity Employers for Hispanics 2010 Yes Yes The top employers selected based on their unique diversity plan and policies.
Top Diversity Employers for Hispanics 2013 Top Diversity Employers for Hispanics 2013 Yes Yes The top employers selected based on their unique diversity plan and policies.
Top Diversity Employers for Hispanics 2014 Top Diversity Employers for Hispanics 2014 Yes Yes The top employers selected based on their unique diversity plan and policies.
Top Diversity Employers for Hispanics 2017 Top Diversity Employers for Hispanics 2017 Yes The top employers selected based on their unique diversity plan and policies.
Top Diversity Employers for Hispanics 2018 Top Diversity Employers for Hispanics 2018 Yes Yes The top employers selected based on their unique diversity plan and policies.
Top Diversity Employers for Hispanics 2019 Top Diversity Employers for Hispanics 2019 Yes Yes The top employers selected based on their unique diversity plan and policies.
Top Diversity Employers for Hispanics 2020 Top Diversity Employers for Hispanics 2020 Yes Yes The top employers selected based on their unique diversity plan and policies.
Top Diversity Employers for Hispanics 2021 Top Diversity Employers for Hispanics 2021 Yes Yes The top employers selected based on their unique diversity plan and policies.
Top Diversity Employers for Hispanics 2022 Top Diversity Employers for Hispanics 2022 Yes Yes The top employers selected based on their unique diversity plan and policies.
Top Diversity Employers for Hispanics 2023 Top Diversity Employers for Hispanics 2023 Yes Yes The top employers selected based on their unique diversity plan and policies.
Top 100 Diversity Supplier Programs for Hispanics Top 100 Diversity Supplier Programs NA Yes Yes The top 100 suppliers selected by Hispanic Network Magazine's comprehensive study of each program and policies to include the development of disadvantaged business owner partnerships and the procurement process.
Top 100 Diversity Supplier Programs for Hispanics for 2021 Top 100 Diversity Supplier Programs for 2021 Yes Yes The top 100 suppliers selected by Hispanic Network Magazine's comprehensive study of each program and policies to include the development of disadvantaged business owner partnerships and the procurement process.
Top 100 Diversity Supplier Programs for Hispanics for 2022 Top 100 Diversity Supplier Programs for 2022 Yes Yes The top 100 suppliers selected by Hispanic Network Magazine's comprehensive study of each program and policies to include the development of disadvantaged business owner partnerships and the procurement process.
Top 100 Diversity Supplier Programs for Hispanics for 2023 Top 100 Diversity Supplier Programs for 2023 Yes Yes The top 100 suppliers selected by Hispanic Network Magazine's comprehensive study of each program and policies to include the development of disadvantaged business owner partnerships and the procurement process.
Tea Party Patriots Boycott List List of companies deemed unpatriotic by members of the Tea Party Patriots NA yes Yes NA
The Transition Pathway Initiative (TPI) Click here to see the 23 items available from this source
The Transition Pathway Initiative (TPI) Level 0 4 4STAR Company's level of management of greenhouse gas emissions and of risk and opportunites to the low-carbon transition. (Level 0 - Unaware. Level 1 - Awareness. Level 2 - Building capacity. Level 3 - Integrating into operational decision making. Level 4 - St
The Transition Pathway Initiative (TPI) MQ Assessment Date 12/3/2020
The Transition Pathway Initiative (TPI) MQ Publication Date 1/10/2020
The Transition Pathway Initiative (TPI) Q7L3|Has the company set quantitative targets for reducing its greenhouse gas emissions? Yes Yes A company's determination of quantative goals to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. (yes/no)
The Transition Pathway Initiative (TPI) Q8L3|Does the company report on Scope 3 emissions? Yes Yes A company's Scope 3 emissions report. (yes/no)
The Transition Pathway Initiative (TPI) Q9L3|Has the company had its operational (Scope 1 and/or 2) greenhouse gas emissions data verified? Yes Yes The verification of a company's operational greenhouse gas emission data. (yes/no)
The Transition Pathway Initiative (TPI) Q15L4|Does the company's remuneration for senior executives incorporate climate change performance? Yes Yes A company's policy of rewarding senior executives for climate change policy performance. (yes/no)
The Transition Pathway Initiative (TPI) Q16L4|Does the company incorporate climate change risks and opportunities in their strategy? No Yes A company's incorporation of climate change risk and opportunities into their business strategy. (yes/no)
The Transition Pathway Initiative (TPI) Q17L4|Does the company undertake climate scenario planning? Yes Yes A company's inclusion of climate change into their business planning. (yes/no)
The Transition Pathway Initiative (TPI) Q18L4|Does the company disclose an internal price of carbon? No Yes A company's inclusion and disclosure of internal price of carbon. (yes/no)
The Transition Pathway Initiative (TPI) Q19L4|Does the company ensure consistency between its climate change policy and the positions taken by trade associations of which it is a member? No Yes A company's consistant policy and position on climate change as compared to the trade associations of which they are members of
The Transition Pathway Initiative (TPI) Performance Compared to Previous Year unchanged A company's score and level as compared to the previous year. (up/down/new/unchanged)
The Transition Pathway Initiative (TPI) Q10L3|Does the company support domestic and international efforts to mitigate climate change? Yes Yes Company's domestic and international support to combat climate change. (yes/no)
The Transition Pathway Initiative (TPI) Q11L3|Does the company disclose its membership and involvement in trade associations engaged in climate issues? Yes Yes Company's disclosure of involvement in trade associations that particiapte in climate change agendas. (yes/no)
The Transition Pathway Initiative (TPI) Q12L3|Does the company have a process to manage climate-related risks? Yes Yes Company's strategy on managing and assessing climate change risks. (yes/no/not applicable)
The Transition Pathway Initiative (TPI) Q13L3|Does the company disclose Scope 3 use of product emissions? Not applicable Yes A company's disclosure of Scope 3 (use of product) emissions. (yes/no)
The Transition Pathway Initiative (TPI) Q14L4|Has the company set long-term quantitative targets for reducing its greenhouse gas emissions? Yes Yes A company's long term strategy of reducing greenhouse gas emissions. (yes/no)
The Transition Pathway Initiative (TPI) Q1L0|Does the company acknowledge climate change as a significant issue for the business? Yes Yes A company's acknowledgement that their business strategy will/might change due to climate change. (yes/no)
The Transition Pathway Initiative (TPI) Q2L1|Does the company recognise climate change as a relevant risk and/or opportunity for the business? Yes Yes A company's determination that climate change is a risk/opportunity to their business strategy. (yes/no)
The Transition Pathway Initiative (TPI) Q3L1|Does the company have a policy (or equivalent) commitment to action on climate change? Yes Yes A company's officially planned action(s) towards climate change effects. (yes/no)
The Transition Pathway Initiative (TPI) Q4L2|Has the company set greenhouse gas emission reduction targets? Yes Yes A company's determination of goals to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. (yes/no)
The Transition Pathway Initiative (TPI) Q5L2|Has the company published information on its Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions? Yes Yes The official publishing of the company's plan to combat their greenhouse gas emission and impact of global warming. (yes/no)
The Transition Pathway Initiative (TPI) Q6L3|Has the company nominated a board member or board committee with explicit responsibility for oversight of the climate change policy? Yes Yes The company's official creation of an entity for climate change policy enactment. (yes/no)
Transparency International Click here to see the 31 items available from this source
Transparency International Does the company have a policy defining appropriate/ inappropriate gifts, hospitality and travel expenses? 0 1 1
Transparency International Does the company have a policy prohibiting political contributions or if it does make such contributions, are they fully disclosed? 0 0 1
Transparency International Does the company disclose percentages owned in its non-fully consolidated material subsidiaries 0 n.a. 1
Transparency International Does the company disclose countries of operations of its non-fully consolidated material subsidiaries 0 n.a. 1
Transparency International Does the company disclose percentages owned in its fully consolidated material subsidiaries 0 1 1
Transparency International Does the company leadership demonstrate support for anti-corruption? E.g. is there a statement in corporate citizenship report or in public pronouncements to integrity? 0 1 1
Transparency International Does the company provide channels through which employees can report potential violations of policy or seek advice (e.g. whistle-blowing) in confidence? 0 1 1
Transparency International Does the company disclose countries of incorporation of its fully consolidated material subsidiaries 0 1 1
Transparency International Does the company disclose countries of incorporation of its non-fully consolidated material subsidiaries 0 n.a. 1
Transparency International Does the company disclose countries of operations of its fully consolidated material subsidiaries 0 0 1
Transparency International Does the company carry out regular monitoring of its anti-corruption programme? 0 0 1
Transparency International DISCLOSURE OF SUBSIDIARIES Total Score 1 3 8
Transparency International Does the company prohibit retaliation for reporting the violation of a policy? 0 1 1
Transparency International Does the company have a publicly stated commitment to anti-corruption? 0 1 1
Transparency International Does the company have an anti-corruption training programme for ist employees in place? 0 0 1
Transparency International Home Country United States Country where company originated, or company's place of domocile.
Transparency International % SCORE FOR FOREIGN OPERATIONS 0.0% 14.0% 50%%
Transparency International % SCORE FOR HOME OPERATIONS 0.0% 90.0% 100%%
Transparency International ANTI-CORRUPTION PROGRAMME Percent Score 0.0% 76.9% 100%%
Transparency International ANTI-CORRUPTION PROGRAMME Total Score 0 10 13
Transparency International DISCLOSURE OF SUBSIDIARIES Percentage Score 18.8%% 75.0% 87.5%%
Transparency International Does the company’s code of conduct / anti-corruption policy explicitly apply to all employees? 0 1 1
Transparency International Does the company’s code of conduct / anti-corruption policy explicitly apply to contractors, subcontractors and suppliers? 0 1 1
Transparency International Is there a policy that explicitly forbids facilitation payments? 0 1 1
Transparency International No. of Foreign countries of operations 5 15 96 Country other than where the company originated, or company's place of domocile.
Transparency International TOTAL POINTS FOR FOREIGN OPERATIONS 0 11 90
Transparency International TOTAL POINTS FOR HOME OPERATIONS 0 5 5
Transparency International Does the company disclose the full list of its fully consolidated material subsidiaries 0 1 1
Transparency International Does the company disclose the full list of its non-fully consolidated material subsidiaries (associates, joint-ventures, entities consolidated by equity method) 0 n.a. 1
Transparency International Does the company publicly commit to be in compliance with all relevant laws, including anti-corruption laws? 0 1 1
Transparency International Does the company’s code of conduct / anti-corruption policy explicitly apply to all agents and other intermediaries? 0 1 1
Training Magazine Top 125 for Employee Development--2018 Click here to see the 3 items available from this source
Training Magazine Top 125 for Employee Development--2018 Honored for Best Practice NA yes NA
Training Magazine Top 125 for Employee Development--2018 Honored for Outstanding Training Initiative NA yes NA
Training Magazine Top 125 for Employee Development--2018 Rank/Award 118 86 2 NA
Training Magazine Top 125 for Employee Development--2019 Rank/Award 120 NA
Training Magazine Top 125 for Employee Development--2020 Rank/Award Yes Yes
The Sustainability Consortium member Member of TSC Yes Yes
Black Collegian 2009 (Universum) Universum 100 Diverse Employers NA Yes Yes NA
Black Collegian 2012 (Universum) Black Collegian 100 Diverse Employers Yes Yes NA
UN Office on Drugs and Crime Anti-Corruption Measures United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime Anti-Corruption Measures No Yes Yes Information on which Fortune Global 500 companies have and don't have anti-corruption policiestheir business practices and use the assessment to better develop and integrate their CR agenda.
Uzbek Cotton Pledge Signatories Click here to see the 2 items available from this source
Uzbek Cotton Pledge Signatories Sum of brands 1 13 14 Number of brands under one parent company that make the pledge against Forced Labor in the Cotton Sector of Uzbekistan
Uzbek Cotton Pledge Signatories RSN Pledge Yes Yes Company Pledge Against Forced Labor in the Cotton Sector of Uzbekistan
America Is All In Committed to We Are Still There Yes NA
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation Click here to see the 65 items available from this source
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation Total score (max. 20) 0.0 9.0 17.5
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 18d.The company requires third-party lobbyists to comply with its lobbying and political engagement policy (or policies). Not Met Not Met Met Indicator element 18d.The company requires third-party lobbyists to comply with its lobbying and political engagement policy (or policies).
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 1a.The company has a publicly available policy statement committing it to respect human rights, which is approved by the highest governance body. Not Met Met Met Indicator element 1a.The company has a publicly available policy statement committing it to respect human rights, which is approved by the highest governance body.
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 2.Commitment to respect the human rights of workers 0.0 1.0 1.0 The company publicly commits to respecting the principles concerning fundamental rights at work in the eight ILO core conventions as set out in the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work. It also has a publicly available statement of
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 2a.The company has a publicly available policy statement committing it to respecting the human rights that the ILO has declared to be fundamental rights at work Not Met Met Met Indicator element 2a.The company has a publicly available policy statement committing it to respecting the human rights that the ILO has declared to be fundamental rights at work
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 2b.The company has a publicly available statement of policy that expects its business relationships to commit to respecting the human rights that the ILO has declared to be fundamental Not Met Met Met Indicator element 2b.The company has a publicly available statement of policy that expects its business relationships to commit to respecting the human rights that the ILO has declared to be fundamental
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 3.Identifying human rights risks and impacts 0.0 0.0 1.0 The company publicly commits to respecting the principles concerning fundamental rights at work in the eight ILO core conventions as set out in the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work. It also has a publicly available statement of
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 3a.The company describes the process(es) to identify its human rights risks and impacts in specific locations or activities covering its own operations. Not Met Not Met Met Indicator element 3a.The company describes the process(es) to identify its human rights risks and impacts in specific locations or activities covering its own operations.
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 3b.The company describes the process(es) to identify its human rights risks and impacts in specific locations or activities through relevant business relationships. Not Met Not Met Met Indicator element 3b.The company describes the process(es) to identify its human rights risks and impacts in specific locations or activities through relevant business relationships.
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 4.Assessing human rights risks and impacts 0.0 0.0 1.0 The company publicly commits to respecting the principles concerning fundamental rights at work in the eight ILO core conventions as set out in the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work. It also has a publicly available statement of
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 4a.The company describes its process(es) for assessing its human rights risks and discloses what it considers to be its salient human rights issues. Not Met Not Met Met Indicator element 4a.The company describes its process(es) for assessing its human rights risks and discloses what it considers to be its salient human rights issues.
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 4b.The company publicly discloses the results of its assessments, which may be aggregated across its operations and locations. Not Met Not Met Met Indicator element 4b.The company publicly discloses the results of its assessments, which may be aggregated across its operations and locations.
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 5.Integrating and acting on human rights risks and impacts 0.0 1.0 1.0 The company publicly commits to respecting the principles concerning fundamental rights at work in the eight ILO core conventions as set out in the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work. It also has a publicly available statement of
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 18b.The company has a publicly available policy statement that specifies that it does not make political contributions. Not Met Not Met Met Indicator element 18b.The company has a publicly available policy statement that specifies that it does not make political contributions.
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 18c.The company discloses its expenditures on lobbying activities. Not Met Not Met Met Indicator element 18c.The company discloses its expenditures on lobbying activities.
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 13.Workforce diversity disclosure fundamentals 0.0 0.5 1.0 The company discloses the percentage of employees for each employee category by at least four indicators of diversity
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 5a.The company describes its global system to take action to prevent, mitigate or remediate its salient human rights issues Not Met Partially Met Met Indicator element 5a.The company describes its global system to take action to prevent, mitigate or remediate its salient human rights issues, AND this includes a description of how its global system ap
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 5b.The company provides an example of the specific conclusions reached and actions taken or to be taken on at least one of its salient human rights issues as a result of assessment Not Met Not Met Met Indicator element 5b.The company provides an example of the specific conclusions reached and actions taken or to be taken on at least one of its salient human rights issues as a result of assessment
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 17c.The company includes anti-bribery and anti-corruption clauses in its contracts with business relationships Not Met Met Met Indicator element 17c.The company includes anti-bribery and anti-corruption clauses in its contracts with business relationships
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 17d.The company indicates that it has a confidential and anonymous channel/mechanism accessible to all stakeholders to raise bribery and corruption concerns and complaints Not Met Met Met Indicator element 17d.The company indicates that it has a confidential and anonymous channel/mechanism accessible to all stakeholders to raise bribery and corruption concerns and complaints without fear
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 18.Responsible lobbying and political engagement fundamentals 0.0 0.0 1.0 The company has an approach to lobbying and political engagement and has related controls in place.
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 18a.The company has a publicly available policy statement(s) (or policy(ies) setting out its lobbying and political engagement approach. Not Met Not Met Met Indicator element 18a.The company has a publicly available policy statement(s) (or policy(ies) setting out its lobbying and political engagement approach.
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 6a.The company discloses the categories of stakeholders whose human rights have been or may be affected by its activities. Not Met Met Met Indicator element 6a.The company discloses the categories of stakeholders whose human rights have been or may be affected by its activities.
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 6b.The company provides at least two examples of its engagement with stakeholders whose human rights have been or may be affected by its activities or their legitimate representatives Not Met Met Met Indicator element 6b.The company provides at least two examples of its engagement with stakeholders whose human rights have been or may be affected by its activities (or their legitimate representatives
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 7.Grievance mechanisms for workers 0.0 1.0 1.0 The company publicly commits to respecting the principles concerning fundamental rights at work in the eight ILO core conventions as set out in the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work. It also has a publicly available statement of
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 7a.The company indicates that it has one or more channel(s)/mechanism(s), or participates in a third-party or shared mechanism, accessible to all workers to raise complaints or concerns Not Met Met Met Indicator element 7a.The company indicates that it has one or more channel(s)/mechanism(s), or participates in a third party or shared mechanism, accessible to all workers to raise complaints or concerns related to the company.
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 8.Grievance mechanisms for external individuals and communities 0.0 1.0 1.0 The company publicly commits to respecting the principles concerning fundamental rights at work in the eight ILO core conventions as set out in the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work. It also has a publicly available statement of
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 8a.The company indicates that it has one or more channel(s)/mechanism(s), or participates in a shared mechanism, accessible to all external individuals and communities who may be adversely impacted by the Company (or individuals or organisations acting on Not Met Met Met Indicator element 8a.The company indicates that it has one or more channel(s)/mechanism(s), or participates in a shared mechanism, accessible to all external individuals and communities who may be adversely impacted by the Company (or individuals or organ
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 9.Health and safety fundamentals 0.0 0.5 1.0 The company publicly commits to respecting the principles concerning fundamental rights at work in the eight ILO core conventions as set out in the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work. It also has a publicly available statement of
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 9a.The company has a publicly available policy statement committing it to respect the health and safety of workers. Not Met Met Met Indicator element 9a.The company has a publicly available policy statement committing it to respect the health and safety of workers.
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 9b.The company discloses quantitative information on health and safety for its workers. Not Met Not Met Met Indicator element 9b.The company discloses quantitative information on health and safety for its workers.
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 9c.The company has a publicly available statement of policy that expects its business relationships to commit to respecting the health and safety of their workers. Not Met Met Met Indicator element 9c.The company has a publicly available statement of policy that expects its business relationships to commit to respecting the health and safety of their workers.
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 9d.The company discloses how it monitors the health and safety performance of its business relationships. Not Met Met Met Indicator element 9d.The company discloses how it monitors the health and safety performance of its business relationships.
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 1.Commitment to respect human rights 0.0 1.0 1.0 The company publicly commits to respecting all internationally recognised human rights across its activities.
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 10.Living wage fundamentals 0.0 0.0 1.0 The company is committed to pay a living wage to its workers and supports the payment of a living wage by its business relationships.
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 10a.The company discloses a time-bound target for paying all workers a living wage or that it has achieved paying all workers a living wage. Not Met Not Met Met Indicator element 10a.The company discloses a time-bound target for paying all workers a living wage or that it has achieved paying all workers a living wage.
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 10b.The company publicly states that all overtime work must be consensual and be paid at a premium rate. Not Met Not Met Met Indicator element 10b.The company has a publicly available statement of policy that expects its business relationships to commit to respecting the health and safety of their workers.
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 10c.The company describes how it works to support the payment of a living wage by its business relationships. Not Met Not Met Met Indicator element 10c.The company describes how it works to support the payment of a living wage by its business relationships.
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 11.Working hours fundamentals 0.0 0.0 1.0 The company does not require workers to work more than the regular and overtime hours and places equivalent expectations on its business relationships.
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 11a.The company publicly states that workers shall not be required to work more than 48 hours in a regular work week or 60 hours including overtime. Not Met Not Met Met Indicator element 11a.The company publicly states that workers shall not be required to work more than 48 hours in a regular work week or 60 hours including overtime.
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 11b.The company publicly states that all overtime work must be consensual and be paid at a premium rate. Not Met Not Met Met Indicator element 11b.The company publicly states that all overtime work must be consensual and be paid at a premium rate.
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 11c.The company has a public expectation that its business relationships shall not require workers to work more than 48 hours in a regular work week or 60 hours including overtime. Not Met Not Met Met Indicator element 11c.The company has a public expectation that its business relationships shall not require workers to work more than 48 hours in a regular work week or 60 hours including overtime.
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 12.Collective bargaining fundamentals 0.0 0.0 1.0 The company discloses information about collective bargaining agreements covering its workforce and its approach to supporting the practices of its business relationships in relation to freedom of association and collective bargaining
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 12a.The company discloses the proportion of its total direct operations workforce covered by collective bargaining agreements. Not Met Not Met Met Indicator element 12a.The company discloses the proportion of its total direct operations workforce covered by collective bargaining agreements.
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 12b.The company describes how it works to support the practices of its business relationships in relation to freedom of association and collective bargaining. Not Met Not Met Met Indicator element 12b.The company describes how it works to support the practices of its business relationships in relation to freedom of association and collective bargaining.
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 13a.The company discloses the proportion of its total direct operations workforce for each employee category by age group. Not Met Not Met Met Indicator element 13a.The company discloses the proportion of its total direct operations workforce for each employee category by age group.
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 13b.The company discloses the proportion of its total direct operations workforce for each employee category by gender. Not Met Met Met Indicator element 13b.The company discloses the proportion of its total direct operations workforce for each employee category by gender.
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 13c.The company discloses the proportion of its total direct operations workforce for each employee category by race or ethnicity. Not Met Not Met Met Indicator element 13c.The company discloses the proportion of its total direct operations workforce for each employee category by race or ethnicity.
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 13d.The company discloses the proportion of its total direct operations workforce for each employee category by one or more additional indicators of diversity Not Met Not Met Met Indicator element 13d.The company discloses the proportion of its total direct operations workforce for each employee category by one or more additional indicators of diversity (e.g. disability, sexual i
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 14.Gender equality and women’s empowerment fundamentals 0.0 0.0 1.0 The company publicly commits to gender equality and women’s empowerment and discloses quantitative information on gender equality and women’s empowerment.
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 14a.The company has a public commitment to gender equality and women’s empowerment. Not Met Not Met Met Indicator element 14a.The company has a public commitment to gender equality and women’s empowerment.
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 14b.The company discloses one or more time-bound targets on gender equality and women’s empowerment. Not Met Not Met Met Indicator element 14b.The company discloses one or more time-bound targets on gender equality and women’s empowerment.
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 14c.The company has at least 30% women on the highest governance body. Not Met Not Met Met Indicator element 14c.The company has at least 30% women on the highest governance body.
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 14d.The company discloses the ratio of the basic salary and remuneration of women to men in its total direct operations workforce for each employee category Not Met Not Met Met Indicator element 14d.The company discloses the ratio of the basic salary and remuneration of women to men in its total direct operations workforce for each employee category, by significant locations of
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 15.Personal data protection fundamentals 0.0 1.0 1.0 The company publicly commits to protecting personal data and has a global approach to data privacy.
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 15a.The company has a public commitment to protecting personal data.  Not Met Met Met Indicator element 15a.The company has a public commitment to protecting personal data.
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 15b.The company has a global publicly available privacy statement in relation to the collection, sharing and access to personal data.  Not Met Met Met Indicator element 15b.The company has a global publicly available privacy statement in relation to the collection, sharing and access to personal data.
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 16.Responsible tax fundamentals 0.0 0.0 1.0 The company has a public global tax approach and discloses its corporate income tax payments on a country-by-country basis
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 16a.The company has a publicly available global tax strategy, which is approved by the highest governance body. Not Met Not Met Met Indicator element 16a.The company has a publicly available global tax strategy, which is approved by the highest governance body.
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 6.Engaging with affected and potentially affected stakeholders Not Met 1 Met The company publicly commits to respecting the principles concerning fundamental rights at work in the eight ILO core conventions as set out in the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work. It also has a publicly available statement of
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 16b.A governance body or executive-level position is tasked with accountability for compliance with the company’s global tax strategy. Not Met Not Met Met Indicator element 16b.A governance body or executive-level position is tasked with accountability for compliance with the company’s global tax strategy.
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 16c.The company clearly discloses the amount of corporate income tax paid for each tax jurisdiction where the company is a resident for tax purposes. Not Met Not Met Met Indicator element 16c.The company clearly discloses the amount of corporate income tax paid for each tax jurisdiction where the company is a resident for tax purposes.
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 17.Anti-bribery and anti-corruption fundamentals 0.0 1.0 1.0 The company publicly prohibits bribery and corruption and takes steps to identify and address bribery and corruption risks and incidents
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 17a.The company has a publicly available policy statement prohibiting bribery and corruption. Not Met Met Met Indicator element 17a.The company has a publicly available policy statement prohibiting bribery and corruption.
World Benchmarking Alliance Social Transformation 17b.The company describes the process(es) to identify its bribery and corruption risks and impacts in specific locations or activities covering its own operations. Not Met Met Met Indicator element 17b.The company describes the process(es) to identify its bribery and corruption risks and impacts in specific locations or activities covering its own operations.
World Business Council for Sustainable Development List of WBCSD members Yes Yes NA
World Benchmarking Alliance SDG2000 Click here to see the 13 items available from this source
World Benchmarking Alliance SDG2000 Financial NA Yes Financial transformation includes reorienting the flow of capital to accelarate the economy's tranistion toward long-term sustainable development
World Benchmarking Alliance SDG2000 Food and agriculture Yes Yes Food and agriculture transformation includes producing healthy and nutritious food to feed a growing world population, while staying within planetary boundaries, and offer farmers, fishers and their families a decent standard of living.
World Benchmarking Alliance SDG2000 Industry Retail
World Benchmarking Alliance SDG2000 Social Yes Yes Social transformation includes achieving universal human development by respecting human rights, promoting equality and empowering people to pursue the choices they value.
World Benchmarking Alliance SDG2000 Urban NA Yes Urban transformation includes creating sustainable, inclusive and connected cities that are safe, resilient and clean.
World Benchmarking Alliance SDG2000 Circular Yes Yes Circular transformation includes decouple consumption and production from natural resources use and innovate to reduce waste and pollution.
World Benchmarking Alliance SDG2000 Country United States of America
World Benchmarking Alliance SDG2000 Decarbonisation and energy NA Yes Decarbonisation and energy transformation includes providing access to modern energy services while drastically reducing the world's dependency on carbon-based energy.
World Benchmarking Alliance SDG2000 Digital NA Yes Digital transformation includes harnessing the benefits of digital technologies while ensuring universal access and managing risks, including safequarding.
World Benchmarking Alliance SDG2000 Food and Agriculture Transformation Yes Yes Food and agriculture transformation includes producing healthy and nutritious food to feed a growing world population, while staying within planetary boundaries, and offer farmers, fishers and their families a decent standard of living.
World Benchmarking Alliance SDG2000 Nature and Biodiversity Transformation Yes Yes
World Benchmarking Alliance SDG2000 Nature NA Yes
World Benchmarking Alliance SDG2000 Social Transformation Yes Yes Social transformation includes achieving universal human development by respecting human rights, promoting equality and empowering people to pursue the choices they value.
Women's Business Enterprise National Council (WBENC) List of corporate members. Yes Yes NA
WEConnect International List of corporate members. Yes Yes NA
World Economic Forum Members Click here to see the 6 items available from this source
World Economic Forum Members World Economic Forum Member Yes The Forum strives in all its efforts to demonstrate entrepreneurship in the global public interest while upholding the highest standards of governance. Moral and intellectual integrity is at the heart of everything it does.
World Economic Forum Members Regional Partners Yes Technology Pioneers are companies that are involved in the development of life-changing technology innovations and have the potential for a long-term impact on business and society.
World Economic Forum Members Technology Pioneers NA Yes Technology Pioneers are companies that are involved in the development of life-changing technology innovations and have the potential for a long-term impact on business and society.
World Economic Forum Members Global Growth Companies NA Yes Eligible Global Growth Companies demonstrate annual revenue between US$ 100 million and US$ 5 billion, and an average year-to-year growth rate of 15%. Importantly, GGC members are building a global business beyond their traditional markets and are committed to having a positive effect on the economies and societies in which they operate.
World Economic Forum Members Industry Partners Yes Yes Industry Partners come from a broad range of business sectors, including construction, aviation, technology, tourism, food and beverage, energy, engineering and construction, and financial services. These companies are alert to the global issues that most affect their specific industry sector.
World Economic Forum Members Strategic Partners NA Yes Strategic Partners comprise some of the world’s leading corporate citizens and provide essential leadership in support of the Forum’s mission. Strategic Partners are a key force in our activities and communities at the global, regional and industry levels. They help shape our initiatives, projects and task forces and give intellectual guidance through the participation of their most senior executives on steering boards and in advisory groups. Their considerable financial support and in-kind services – including the provision of dedicated staff to assist with our operations – allow the Forum to deliver its programmes and advance worldwide economic and social progress.
WeGreen Click here to see the 7 items available from this source
WeGreen Total source count 1 3 13 NA
WeGreen Weighted score 1.2 4.0 5.9
WeGreen colorWithoutCsrhub yellow NA
WeGreen gradeWithoutCsrhub 1.0 3.0 5.9 NA
WeGreen scoreWithoutCsrhub 0.0 56.3 98.6
WeGreen url http://wegreen.de/#!/hersteller/Wal-Mart%20Canada/nachhaltigkeit NA
WeGreen urlGradeImageWithoutCsrhub https://static.wegreen.de/images/wg4/scores/numbers/120/3.0.png NA
We Mean Business List of Organizations in We Mean Business Yes Businesses that recognize that the transition to a low carbon economy is the only way to secure sustainable economic growth and prosperity for all.
Working Multicultural Women 2009 Working Multicultural Women list NA Yes Yes NA
Working Multicultural Women 2010 Working Multicultural Women list 2010 Yes Yes Working Mother magazine's list of companies friendly to multi-cultural women.
Working Multicultural Women 2011 Working Multicultural Women list 2011 Yes Yes Working Mother magazine's list of companies friendly to multi-cultural women.
Working Multicultural Women 2012 Working Multicultural Women list 2012 Yes Yes Working Mother magazine's list of companies friendly to multi-cultural women.
Working Multicultural Women 2014 Working Multicultural Women list 2014 Yes Yes Working Mother magazine's list of companies friendly to multi-cultural women.
Working Multicultural Women 2015 Working Multicultural Women list 2015 Yes Yes Working Mother magazine's list of companies friendly to multi-cultural women.
Working Multicultural Women 2016 Working Multicultural Women list 2016 Yes Working Mother magazine's list of companies friendly to multi-cultural women.
Working Multicultural Women 2017 Working Multicultural Women list 2017 Yes Working Mother magazine's list of companies friendly to multi-cultural women.
Working Multicultural Women 2018 Working Multicultural Women list 2018 Yes Yes Working Mother magazine's list of companies friendly to multi-cultural women.
1 Custom Report Available for Walmart Inc.

Reports are based on the current dataset.

We use cookies to improve the usability of our site and to analyze traffic patterns so we can improve our utility. Please agree to our use of cookies.
Decline