$0
0 item(s) in the shopping cart

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. CSR Ratings

53
CSR Rating Compared With All Companies
?
Community
49
Employees
49
Environment
61
Governance
50
Low
0-29
30-39
40-49
50-59
60-79
80-100
High
?
CSR Rating History
This company vs 16,494 companies
The average for the 283 companies in the Retail industry
?
  • Gay & Lesbian Sensitive
  • Military Contractor
  • Oceana Red List
  • Working Mother-Friendly

4 Special Issues

Affect This Company

?
64
Active Sources
145 Total Sources
?
Share This Summary

Walmart serves customers and members more than 200 million times per week at more than 8,969 retail units under 55 different banners in 15 countries. With fiscal year 2010 sales of $405 billion, Walmart employs 2.1 million associates worldwide

Ticker: WMT
ISIN: US9311421039
Address:

702 SW 8th Street

  Bentonville, AR, 72716-8611, USA
Website: Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Phone #: 800-438-6278
CSR Web Area: Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. CSR site ?
Industry: Retail, General Merchandise Stores, Wholesale Trade
PRIORITIES
Community
2.6
Employees
2.8
Environment
3.7
Governance
2.9
Edit your profiles
SWITCH PROFILE ?
Data Date
April 01, 2016
0 SPECIAL ISSUES SELECTED
CSR Rating For Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Click On A Company, Industry, Region, Or Subcategory For More Info
Overall Community Employees Environment Governance
Overall CommunityCommunity Dev & PhilanthropyHuman Rights & Supply ChainProduct
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
49
47
45
55
Retail
55
54
52
55
General Merchandise Stores
50
48
48
52
Wholesale Trade
55
53
53
57
Overall EmployeesCompensation & BenefitsDiversity & Labor RightsTraining, Health & Safety
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
49
52
46
49
Retail
56
57
56
55
General Merchandise Stores
52
53
51
51
Wholesale Trade
56
56
56
54
Overall EnvironmentEnergy & Climate ChangeEnvironment Policy & ReportingResource Management
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
61
63
63
57
Retail
55
52
57
54
General Merchandise Stores
53
51
56
51
Wholesale Trade
53
53
55
49
Overall GovernanceBoardLeadership EthicsTransparency & Reporting
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
50
47
46
56
Retail
52
49
55
48
General Merchandise Stores
53
46
57
49
Wholesale Trade
49
49
50
46
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
53
49
49
61
50
Community Dev & Philanthropy
47
Compensation & Benefits
52
Energy & Climate Change
63
Board
47
Product
55
Diversity & Labor Rights
46
Environment Policy & Reporting
63
Leadership Ethics
46
Human Rights & Supply Chain
45
Training, Health & Safety
49
Resource Management
57
Transparency & Reporting
56
Retail
53
55
56
55
52
Community Dev & Philanthropy
54
Compensation & Benefits
57
Energy & Climate Change
52
Board
49
Product
55
Diversity & Labor Rights
56
Environment Policy & Reporting
57
Leadership Ethics
55
Human Rights & Supply Chain
52
Training, Health & Safety
55
Resource Management
54
Transparency & Reporting
48
General Merchandise Stores
51
50
52
53
53
Community Dev & Philanthropy
48
Compensation & Benefits
53
Energy & Climate Change
51
Board
46
Product
52
Diversity & Labor Rights
51
Environment Policy & Reporting
56
Leadership Ethics
57
Human Rights & Supply Chain
48
Training, Health & Safety
51
Resource Management
51
Transparency & Reporting
49
Wholesale Trade
52
55
56
53
49
Community Dev & Philanthropy
53
Compensation & Benefits
56
Energy & Climate Change
53
Board
49
Product
57
Diversity & Labor Rights
56
Environment Policy & Reporting
55
Leadership Ethics
50
Human Rights & Supply Chain
53
Training, Health & Safety
54
Resource Management
49
Transparency & Reporting
46
USA
53
58
57
52
46
Community Dev & Philanthropy
55
Compensation & Benefits
57
Energy & Climate Change
51
Board
46
Product
63
Diversity & Labor Rights
56
Environment Policy & Reporting
52
Leadership Ethics
47
Human Rights & Supply Chain
55
Training, Health & Safety
58
Resource Management
52
Transparency & Reporting
44
All company average
54
57
58
56
51
Community Dev & Philanthropy
57
Compensation & Benefits
56
Energy & Climate Change
52
Board
47
Product
57
Diversity & Labor Rights
58
Environment Policy & Reporting
58
Leadership Ethics
55
Human Rights & Supply Chain
55
Training, Health & Safety
58
Resource Management
55
Transparency & Reporting
48
Low
0-29
30-39
40-49
50-59
60-79
80-100
High
?
CSRHub Rating History For Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

There is no history for the selected element(s).

Click And Drag Within The Box Below To Select A Time Range
Add Or Remove Items For Comparison
Add...
CSRHub Ranking (%) History For Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

There is no history for the selected element(s).

Click And Drag Within The Box Below To Select A Time Range
Add Or Remove Items For Comparison
Add...
4 Special Issues Affect Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Gay & Lesbian Sensitive Military Contractor Oceana Red List Working Mother-Friendly
Gay & Lesbian Sensitive Military Contractor Oceana Red List Working Mother-Friendly
# of Data Sources 1 3 1 11
Companies Affected # % # % # % # %
Retail 24 8.5 4 1.4 4 1.4 1 0.4
General Merchandise Stores 1 2.7 1 2.7 1 2.7 1 2.7
Wholesale Trade 23 18.5 4 3.2 1 0.8 2 1.6
All 16,495 Companies 339 2.1 173 1.0 14 0.1 80 0.5
CSRHub Has 64 Active Source(s) and 145 Total Source(s) for Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
out of 200 Active and 469 Total Sources for All Companies
64 Active Sources
81 Inactive Sources -- data from these sources is not used in the currently selected ratings set
Investigate 961 Data Value(s) From 145 Active and Inactive Sources That Contribute To Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

List includes Data Source; Data Element; Original Data Value; Date Last Updated. (Items in green contribute to current ratings.

Items in blue contribute to historic ratings. For some companies and some subcategories, there may be too many data items to report them all.)

Source Element Minimum value Value Maximum value Data description
2020 Women on Boards Click here to see the 2 items available from this source
2020 Women on Boards % of Women 0.0% 27.0% 64.0% the percentage of women on U.S. company boards
2020 Women on Boards The percentage of women on U.S. company boards 0.0% 24.0% 57.0% NA
AccountAbility Top 100 most accountable companies according to AccountAbility 11.2 44.1 77.7 NA
AMEE Click here to see the 9 items available from this source
AMEE amee_industry_score 0 NA 100 NA
AMEE country_code US NA
AMEE Emissions per assets 2.8321 NA 0.0 NA
AMEE Emissions per employee 235484.5 NA 0.07 NA
AMEE emissions_scope1_tco2e NA NA
AMEE sustainability_report_url NA NA
AMEE waste_hazardous_kg 72001000 NA 0 NA
AMEE waste_status no_data NA
AMEE water_status no_data NA
As you sow 2013 Click here to see the 3 items available from this source
As you sow 2013 Issues Consumer Packaging, Electronic Waste Sustainability-related issues that companies are facing. Focuses on Bisphenol A, Carbon Bubble, Coal, Consumer Packaging, Electronic Waste, Executive Compensation, GMOs, Hydraulic Fracturing and Nanomaterials
As you sow 2013 Proxy resolution for the company http://www.asyousow.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/2013-walmart-reso.pdf# Web address for the resolution
As you sow 2013 Resolution Status Omitted Dialogue, Withdrawn Withdrawn Status of the company's multiple shareholder resolutions.
Brand Finance 2008-09 Click here to see the 3 items available from this source
Brand Finance 2008-09 Brand Index 2008-09 34.5 71.8 94.7 NA
Brand Finance 2008-09 Brand Value 2008-09 77 40616 40616 NA
Brand Finance 2008-09 Enterprise Value 2008-09 277 244058 635959 NA
Brand Finance 2009-10 Click here to see the 3 items available from this source
Brand Finance 2009-10 Brand Index 2009-10 44.6 70.3 96.0 NA
Brand Finance 2009-10 Brand Value 2009-10 11 41365 41365 NA
Brand Finance 2009-10 Enterprise Value 2009-10 70 190803 528713 NA
Brand Finance 2010-11 Click here to see the 4 items available from this source
Brand Finance 2010-11 Brand Index 2010-11 44.0 71.2 98.4 NA
Brand Finance 2010-11 Brand Value 2010-11 28 36220 44294 NA
Brand Finance 2010-11 Enterprise Value 2010-11 0 154325 475066 NA
Brand Finance 2010-11 Group Global 500 NA
Brand Finance 2011-12 Click here to see the 6 items available from this source
Brand Finance 2011-12 Brand Rating 2012 B AA- AAA+ NA
Brand Finance 2011-12 Brand Value 2012 $19799 NA
Brand Finance 2011-12 BSI 50.0 70.2 88.5 NA
Brand Finance 2011-12 Domicile UNITED STATES NA
Brand Finance 2011-12 Reviewed ? YES NA
Brand Finance 2011-12 Sector Consumer, Cyclical NA
Brand Finance 2012-13 Click here to see the 7 items available from this source
Brand Finance 2012-13 Brand Rating 2013 BBB AA AAA+ NA
Brand Finance 2012-13 Brand Value / Enterprise Value (%) 1.0% 31.9% 4.7473237754% NA
Brand Finance 2012-13 Brand Value 2013 $11 $20876 $67875 NA
Brand Finance 2012-13 BSI 50.0 70.2 89.6 NA
Brand Finance 2012-13 Enterprise Value 2013 $0 $80150 $435751
Brand Finance 2012-13 Reviewed SJD NA
Brand Finance 2012-13 Sector Consumer, Cyclical NA
Brand Finance 2013-14 Click here to see the 6 items available from this source
Brand Finance 2013-14 Brand Rating 2014 A- AA AAA+ These are calculated using Brand Finance's ßrandßeta® analysis which benchmarks the strength, risk and potential of a brand, relative to its competitors, on a scale ranging from AAA to D. It is conceptually similar to a credit rating. The data used to cal
Brand Finance 2013-14 Brand Value 2014 $10 $20876 $87304 A brand strength is assessed by using our Brand Strength Index framework. This benchmarks the strength, risk and future potential of a brand relative to its competitors by assessing input measures, brand equity measures, and output performance across four
Brand Finance 2013-14 BSI 51.3 74.1 94.2 NA
Brand Finance 2013-14 Domicile UNITED STATES NA
Brand Finance 2013-14 Enterprise Value 2014 $66 $86897 $526619 NA
Brand Finance 2013-14 Sector Consumer, Cyclical NA
Brand Finance 2014-15 Click here to see the 2 items available from this source
Brand Finance 2014-15 Brand Rating 2015 A- AA AAA+ These are calculated using Brand Finance's ßrandßeta® analysis which benchmarks the strength, risk and potential of a brand, relative to its competitors, on a scale ranging from AAA to D. It is conceptually similar to a credit rating. The data used to cal
Brand Finance 2014-15 BSI 50.5 75.2 93.4 NA
BlackEngineer Most Admired Companies 2009 Most Admired Companies for Minority Professionals in 2009 100 37 1 Most Admired Companies for Minority Professionals in 2009 were chosen based on a survey completed by hundreds of respondents that consists of 64 questions given to Hispanic, Native American, Asian, black, and other employees in science, technology, engine
BSR Member Companies that are committed to improving its sustainability performance may join BSR NA Yes Yes NA
Best Workplace for Commuters 2009 Best Workplace for Commuters list NA Yes Yes NA
Better World Companies Better World product rating F C A+ Better World Shopper is a site dedicated to providing people with a comprehensive, up-to-date, reliable account of the social and environmental responsibility of every company on the planet AND making it available in practical forms.
CalPERS Proxy Voting 2012 Proxy filed Yes NA
CalPERS Proxy Voting 2014 Click here to see the 2 items available from this source
CalPERS Proxy Voting 2014 Proxy filed Yes Yes No NA
CalPERS Proxy Voting 2014 Proxy voting decisions for the company http://www.calpers-governance.org/proxyvoting/proxy/ticker-results?ticker=WMT# NA
CalPERS Proxy Voting 2015 Click here to see the 3 items available from this source
CalPERS Proxy Voting 2015 Annual Meeting Date June 5, 2015 NA
CalPERS Proxy Voting 2015 Proxy filed Yes Yes No NA
CalPERS Proxy Voting 2015 Proxy voting decisions for the company 4,959,910 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2006 and 2007 Click here to see the 3 items available from this source
Carbon Disclosure Project 2006 and 2007 % of purchased electricity from renewable sources 0.0% 0.0% 45.5% NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2006 and 2007 Please indicate whether you publish information about the risks and opportunities presented to your company by climate change, details of your GHG emissions and plans to reduce emissions through any of the following communications: i) the company’s Annual No NA Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2006 and 2007 Response State Declined to participate Answered questionnaire online Answered questionnaire NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 Click here to see the 16 items available from this source
Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 % of purchased electricity from renewable sources 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 (i) Has the information reported in response to Questions 2(b)- (c) been externally verified or audited or do you plan to have the information verified or audited? no response Yes (Please go to 2(d)(ii)) answered
Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 Do you assess or provide incentive mechanisms for individual management of climate change issues including attainment of GHG targets? If so, please provide details. no response No, we do not. answered
Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 Do you engage with policymakers on possible responses to climate change including taxation, regulation and carbon trading? If so, please provide details. no response Yes answered
Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 Do you forecast your company’s future emissions and/or energy use? no response Yes, we do. (Please answer questions (i) to (iii) below.) answered
Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 Do you invest in, or have plans to invest in products and services that are designed to minimize or adapt to the effects of climate change? no response Climate change has led to investment or planned investment in order to maximise climate change opportunities. answered
Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 Does a Board Committee or other executive body have overall responsibility for climate change? If not, please state how overall responsibility for climate change is managed. If so, please answer parts (i) and (ii) below. no response No executive body has overall responsibility for climate change. answered
Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 Does your company have a system in place to assess the accuracy of GHG emissions inventory calculation methods, data processes and other systems relating to GHG measurement? If so, please provide details. If not, please explain how data accuracy is manag no response Yes, we do have a system. answered
Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 General and regulatory risks management no response We have taken or planned action. answered
Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 i) Does your company have a GHG emissions reduction plan in place? If so, please provide details along with the information requested below. If there is currently no plan in place, please explain why. no response Yes, we have a reduction plan in place. (Please proceed to part (ii) ) answered
Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 iii) Has your company developed emissions intensity targets? no response Yes, we have developed emission intensity targets. (Please answer questions (a) and (b) below.) answered
Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 iii) voluntary communications such as Corporate Social Responsibility reporting no response Yes answered
Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 Response State No Response Answered questionnaire online
Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 Section 2 Index 1596
Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 Section 3 Index 1371
Carbon Disclosure Project 2008 Section 4 Index 1255
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data Click here to see the 129 items available from this source
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 1.1. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 1.1. Description NA Yes, Wal-Mart is exposed to regulatory risks related to climate change. Wal-Mart’s process for identifying regulatory risk is to gather regulatory information from a broad variety of sources including: consulting firms, government organizations and NGOs, NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 1.1. Regulatory Risks NA We consider our company to be exposed to regulatory risks. NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 10.1 Total Scope 1 CO2-e NA 5566006 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 10.5 CH4 NA 4754 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 10.5 CO2 NA 3114116 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 10.5 HFCs NA 2430555 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 10.5 N2O NA 53 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 10.5 SF6 NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 10.6 Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 10.6. If you have not provided any information about Scope 1 emissions in response to the questions above, please explain your reasons and describe any plans you have for collecting Scope 1 GHG emissions information in future. NA We have applied GWP's from IPCC's Second Assessment Report (SAR) to convert all non-CO2 gases into CO2-equivalents as shown below for N2O, CH4, and the refrigerants used in our facilities’ HVAC and refrigeration equipment. Many of our refrigerants are bl NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 11.5 Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 11.5 Further Information NA Totals may not equal sum of individual components due to independent rounding. NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 12.1. If you consider that the grid average factor used to report Scope 2 emissions in question 11 does not reflect the contractual arrangements you have with electricity suppliers, (for example, because you purchase electricity using a zero or low carbon NA Wal-Mart has several contractual arrangements that support the generation of renewable electricity. In the US, we have agreements for solar and wind power purchases, while in Japan, there is a wind purchase program. In 2008, the contractual Scope 2 emis NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 12.2. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 12.2. Further information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 12.2. If you retire any certificates (eg: Renewable Energy Certificates) associated with zero or low carbon electricity, please provide details. NA In 2008, Wal-Mart Canada retired 23,827 green power certificates through a third-party supplier. Each green power certificate represents the rights and benefits to the environmental attributes associated with the generation of 1 MWh of green power, defin NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 13.1 Describe the main sources of emissions for employee business travel NA A large part of Wal-Mart’s business travel is conducted on company-owned aircraft and vehicles, which are included in the Scope 1 mobile fuel emissions reported above. At this time, Wal-Mart does not track commercial business travel emissions data becaus NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 13.1 Emissions in metric tonnes CO2-e. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 13.2 Emissions in metric tonnes CO2-e. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 13.2 State the methodology, assumptions, calculation tools, databases, emission factors (including sources) and global warming potentials (including sources) you have used for calculating emissions. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 13.2. External distribution/logistics NA At this time, Wal-Mart is not reporting Scope 3 emissions from distribution and logistics. It should be noted that unlike many retailers, much of Wal-Mart’s product distribution is performed by Wal-Mart’s owned fleet of tractors and trailers, which are i NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 13.3 State the methodology, assumptions, calculation tools, databases, emission factors (including sources) and global warming potentials (including sources) you have used for calculating emissions. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 13.4 Emissions in metric tonnes CO2-e. NA At this time, while we have undertaken many initiatives to reduce emissions from the use or disposal of the company's goods and services, we are not able to quantify them. NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 13.5 Non-transfers - Describe the main sources of emissions NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 13.5 Other NA Wal-Mart is continuing to evaluate our carbon footprint and may expand GHG assessments to some Scope 3 components in the future. NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 13.6 Further information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 13.6 If you have not provided information about one or more of the categories of Scope 3 GHG emissions in response to the questions above, please explain your reasons and describe any plans you have for collecting Scope 3 indirect emissions information in NA Wal-Mart does not currently have systems in place that will allow us to accurately track commercial employee business travel. While it is not believed that our commercial business travel is a significant source of emissions compared to our Scope 1 and Sc NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 14.1 Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 14.1. If your goods and/or services enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party, please provide details including the estimated avoided emissions, the anticipated timescale over which the emissions are avoided and the methodology, assumptions, emi NA Wal-Mart has numerous initiatives underway with its goods and services to enable GHG emissions to be avoided by third parties, its customers. By reducing the number of plastic shopping bags we give away, we can reduce the amount of waste that ends up in NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 15.1. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 15.1. Please provide the total global carbon dioxide emissions in metric tonnes CO2 from biologically sequestered carbon. NA 217 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 16.1. Please supply a financial emissions intensity measurement for the reporting year for your combined Scope 1 and 2 emissions. NA The financial emissions intensity measurement that is used for our Corporate Sustainability Report is metric tons of GHG emissions per US dollar of sales. A financial intensity measurement that is tied to sales revenue is considered an appropriate indica NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 16.1.1. Give the units. For example, the units could be metric tonnes of CO2-e per million Yen of turnover, metric tonnes of CO2-e per US$ of profit, metric tonnes of CO2-e per thousand Euros of turnover. NA The financial emissions intensity unit of measurement is metric tonnes of CO2-e per US$ of sales revenue. The unit used to report global sales revenue is the US dollar. As Wal-Mart serves customers in 16 markets worldwide, we recognize that foreign curr NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 16.1.2. The resulting figure. NA 5.251e-005 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 16.2. Please supply an activity related intensity measurement for the reporting year for your combined Scope 1 and 2 emissions. NA The activity related intensity measurement is metric tons of GHG emissions per gross square foot of retail space. An activity related intensity measurement that is tied to retail gross square footage would be considered an appropriate indicator of activi NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 16.2.1. Give the units e.g. metric tonnes of CO2-e per metric tonne of output or for service sector businesses per unit of service provided. NA Metric tonnes of CO2-e per gross square foot of store area. NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 16.2.2. Activity related intensity measurement - Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 16.2.2. Activity related intensity measurement - Further information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 16.2.2. The resulting figure. NA 0.0198 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 17.1. Comments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 17.1.1 Further information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 17.1.1. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 17.1.1. Have the emissions increased or decreased? increased decreased
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 17.1.1. If the answer to 17.1 is Yes, estimate the percentage by which emissions vary compared with the previous reporting. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 18.1. Has any of the information reported in response to questions 10 – 15 been externally verified/assured in whole or in part? No information has been provided in response to questions 10-15. Please go to question 19. Yes, it has been externally verified/assured in whole or in part.(Please continue with questions 18.2 to 18.5) Yes, it has been externally verified/assured in whole or in part.(Please continue with questions 18.2 to 18.5)
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 18.2. State the scope/boundary of emissions included within the verification/assurance exercise. NA Scope 1 and Scope 2 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 18.3. State what level of assurance (eg: reasonable or limited) has been given. NA Tier II: A Tier II-level verification is appropriate for basic reporting, and those voluntary efforts and public commitments for which there are no imminent requirements for compliance obligations or emissions trading. It is intended to establish the bas NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 18.5. Specify the standard against which the information has been verified/assured. NA “Corporate Greenhouse Gas Verification Guideline”, ERT, Washington DC, June 2005, www.ert.net/pubs/ERTCGVG.pdf NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 18.6. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 18.6. Further information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 18.6. If none of the information provided in response to questions 10-15 has been verified in whole or in part, please state whether you have plans for GHG emissions accounting information to be externally verified/assured in future. NA Wal-Mart currently plans to have this year's submission externally verified in the future. NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 19.1. Do you gather emissions data? NA Emission data is gathered. NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 19.1. What are the main sources of uncertainty in your data gathering, handling and calculations e.g.: data gaps, assumptions, extrapolation, metering/measurement inaccuracies etc? NA Below, we describe parameter uncertainties associated with our GHG inventory, the percent of the inventory characterized by each uncertainty type, and an associated margin of error. Margin of error was either calculated from GHG estimating guidance docum NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 19.2. How do the main sources of uncertainty in your data gathering, handling and calculations affect the accuracy of the reported data in percentage terms or an estimated standard deviation? NA Based on the areas of uncertainty identified above, we have calculated our total inventory uncertainty according to the following methodology: Identify the percent of each emissions source’s (e.g., onsite diesel fuel) contribution in tons C NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 19.3. Does your company report GHG emissions under any mandatory or voluntary scheme (other than CDP) that requires an accuracy assessment? No (Please go to question 20.) Yes (Please answer the following questions - 19.3.1, 19.3.2). Yes (Please answer the following questions - 19.3.1, 19.3.2).
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 19.3.2. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 19.3.2. Further information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 19.3.2. Please provide the accuracy assessment for GHG emissions reported under that scheme for the last report delivered. NA For 2007 emissions reported under this scheme, the accuracy assessment provided to The Climate Registry was made by an independent third-party verifier. In the accuracy assessment report, the verifier stated that “Based on its review of Wal-Mart’s GHG em NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 2.1. Physical Risks NA We consider our company to be exposed to physical risks. NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 20.1. Select currency NA United States dollar NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 20.1.1. Cooling NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 20.1.1. Cooling - Currency NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 20.1.1. Heat - Currency NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 20.1.1. Steam NA 1631344 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 20.2. The total cost of fuel purchased by your company for mobile and stationary combustion. NA 974897024 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 20.4. In answering this question and the one below, you will have used either Higher Heating Values (also known as Gross Calorific Values) or Lower Heating Values (also known as Net Calorific Values). NA All fuels are converted to MWh using Higher Heating Values. NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 20.4. Your company’s total consumption in MWh of fuels for stationary combustion only. This includes purchased fuels, as well as biomass and self-produced fuels where relevant. NA 7843496 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 20.5. What is the total amount of energy generated in MWh from the fuels reported in question 20.4? NA 7843496 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 20.6. What is the total amount in MWh of renewable energy, excluding biomass, that is self-generated by your company? NA 164 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 20.7. What percentage of the energy reported in response to question 20.5 is exported/sold by your company to the grid or to third parties? NA 0 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 20.8. Further information NA For question 20.1.1, our process hot/cold water is accounted for as one combined cost items so this is treated as energy type Steam. For question 20.5, these stationary combustion fuels are primarily use for heating and process and are not intended NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 21.2. 2009 NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 21.2. The allowances allocated for free for each year of Phase II for facilities which you operate or own. (Even if you do not wholly own facilities, please give the full number of allowances). - Year 2008 NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 21.3. The total allowances purchased through national auctioning processes for the period 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2008 for facilities that you operate or own. (Even if you do not wholly own facilities, please give the total allowances purchased thro NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 21.4. Total CO2 emissions for 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2008 for facilities which you operate or own as a % of total revenue. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 22.1. More information NA Wal-Mat does not currently participate in any emissions trading scheme. However, within the next two years, Wal-Mart anticipates participation in schemes for the UK and for Tokyo, Japan. The UK emissions trading scheme is the Carbon Reduct NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 22.1. Please provide details of any emissions trading schemes, other than the EU ETS, in which your company already participates or is likely to participate within the next two years. We do not participate or anticipate participating in any trading schemes within the next two years. (Please go to question 22.3) We participate or anticipate participating in trading schemes other than the EU ETS in the next two years. We participate or anticipate participating in trading schemes other than the EU ETS in the next two years.
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 22.3. Have you purchased any project-based carbon credits? No. (Please go to question 22.5) No. (Please go to question 22.5) Yes. (Please answer the following questions)
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 22.3. Please indicate whether the credits are to meet one or more of the following commitments: NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 22.4 Provide details including the type of unit, volume and vintage purchased and the standard/scheme against which the credits have been verified, issued and retired (where applicable). NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 22.5. Have you been involved in the origination of project-based carbon credits? No. (Please go to question 22.7) No. (Please go to question 22.7) Yes. (Please answer the following question)
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 22.7. Are you involved in the trading of allowances under the EU ETS and/or project-based carbon credits as a separate business activity, or in direct support of a business activity such as investment fund management or the provision of offsetting service No. (Please go to question 23) No. (Please go to question 23) Yes. (Please answer the following question)
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 22.8. Please provide details of the role performed. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 23.1. Does your company have a GHG emissions and/or energy reduction plan in place? No. (Please answer the following question and then continue with 23.3) Yes. (Please go to question 23.3) Yes. (Please go to question 23.3)
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 23.10. Further information NA We are unable to disclose future investments in truck fleet efficiency measures at this point. Such investments are difficult to estimate until we are more certain of the path we will pursue (e.g. operational changes vs. technology changes). NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 23.13. Please estimate your company’s future Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions for the next five years for each of the main territories or regions in which you operate or provide a qualitative explanation for expected changes that could impact future GHG emis NA Due to competitive reasons, global and regional forecasts for emissions cannot be disclosed. With the company acquiring, building, and/or expanding stores, absolute emissions for Wal-Mart are expected to increase over the next five years due to organic g NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 23.14. Please estimate your company’s future energy use for the next five years for each of the main territories or regions in which you operate or provide a qualitative explanation for expected changes that could impact future GHG emissions. NA Due to competitive reasons, global and regional forecasts for energy use cannot be disclosed. With the company acquiring, building, and/or expanding stores, absolute energy usage for Wal-Mart is expected to increase over the next five years due to organi NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 23.15. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 23.15. Further information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 23.15. Please explain the methodology used for your estimations and any assumptions made. NA The methodology to estimate downward trends in emissions and energy use is based on the assumption that the existing store base will be made more efficient and emit less greenhouse gases over time due to the continued implementation of energy efficiency a NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 23.2. If not, please explain why. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 23.2. If the menu options above are not appropriate, please answer the question using the text box below: NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 23.3. Do you have an emissions and/or energy reduction target(s)? No. (Please go to question 23.8) Yes. (Please answer the following questions) Yes. (Please answer the following questions)
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 23.4 What is the baseline year for the target(s)? NA The baseline year is 2005. The baseline year forms a fixed basis against which to compare emissions in future years, as defined in Chapter 11, p. 79 of the GHG Protocol. NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 23.5. What is the emissions and/or energy reduction target(s)? NA We have several targets that use 2005 as the baseline year. The following goals are stated on page 7 of Lee Scott's 21st Century Leadership speech, dated 10/24/05: “Reducing greenhouse gases at our existing store, club and DC base around t NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 23.6. What are the sources or activities to which the target(s) applies? NA The GHG emissions reduction target encompasses the six major greenhouse gases: carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6). The target applies globally to sto NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 23.7. Further information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 23.7. Over what period/timescale does the target(s) extend? NA For the GHG emissions reduction target, the target extends over 7 years, with 2005 as the baseline year. The target year for achieving the goal is year ending 2012. For the fleet efficiency targets, the target extends over the 2005-2015 pe NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 23.8. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 23.8. What activities are you undertaking or planning to undertake to reduce your emissions/energy use? NA Wal-Mart is designing and building more energy-efficient stores to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Through a process of experimenting, piloting, and then implementing new building technologies, Wal-Mart is able to improve its new store prototype, retrof NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 23.9. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 23.9. Further information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 24.1. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 24.1. Further information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 24.1. How do you factor the cost of future emissions into capital expenditures and what impact have those estimated costs had on your investment decisions? NA Although under analysis, at this time we are unable to specifically identify potential costs from future emissions to a level that would enable incorporation into financial modeling. However, we do expect that in the future there will be enough certainty NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 3.1. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 3.1. Description NA In addition to regulatory and physical risks, we have the general risk of resource availability constraints, caused by climate change, which could pressure our supply chain in the forms of product scarcity, restricted manufacturing capacity, or delivery o NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 4.1. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 4.1. Description NA Wal-Mart believes potential opportunities exist, under a well designed cap-and-trade system, to use the financial value of carbon to "roll back" the price of low carbon products. Such a mechanism would create and encourage meaningful technology adoption b NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 5.1. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 5.1. Description NA At this time, we are unable to identify any specific physical opportunities that rise to a level that would enable commercial action. Wal-Mart’s process for identifying risk or opportunity is to gather relevant information from as broad a NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 5.1. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 6.1. Description NA We are currently deploying a Supplier Energy Efficiency Program (SEEP) that will enable low cost technology transfer throughout our supply network. It is our hope that this will form the basis of an energy efficiency model that can be adopted by any priva NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 6.1. Other opportunities NA Climate change presents other opportunities for my company. NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 7.1. Date selected is NA Other Date NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 7.1. Please state the start date of the year for which you are reporting GHG emissions. NA 01/01/2008 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 9.1. Please describe the process used by your company to calculate Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions including the name of the standard, protocol or methodology you have used to collect activity data and calculate Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions. NA Wal-Mart utilized publically available emissions sources and guidance from the World Resource Institute’s GHG protocol. Additionally, Wal-Mart retained Clear Carbon Consulting (www.clearcarbonconsulting.com) to help coordinate and execute our GHG invento NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 9.1. Select methodologies used to calculate Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions. NA Greenhouse Gas Protocol NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 9.2 Details of any assumptions made. NA As with any corporate inventory, there is usually a small amount of activity data that is missing or not accessible. However, data for our 2008 inventory was our most complete set of actual activity data to date and required very little estimations. Bel NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 9.3 Select calculation tools: NA CCC has developed an internal application used for all of CCC’s corporate inventories. By using a central application, we ensure that the most current emission factors are used, enforce referential integrity to make sure all of the data are calculated, a NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 9.4 The global warming potentials you have applied and their origin. NA IPCC NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 9.5 Further Information NA Because the CDP reporting system's copy&paste limitations for the text box result in formatting issues, we are attaching an Excel file that contains properly formatted tables with Wal-Mart's global warming potentials, emissions factors, and their origins. NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data 9.5 The emission factors you have applied and their origin. NA WRI, E-grid, Defra, Climate Leaders NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data ISIN NA ARDEUT110400 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data Reporting Historical Data NA No NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data Response State No response Answered questionnaire online Answered questionnaire
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data Scope 1 forecasted emissions in Table 15 below are in the following units. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2009 Full Data Scope 2 forecasted emissions in Table 15 below are in the following units. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data Click here to see the 91 items available from this source
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 0. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 0. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 0.3. Are you participating in the Walmart Sustainability Assessment? No Yes Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 1. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2010/02/20402/Investor CDP 2010/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2010/Governance/SVN Graphic.JPG NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 1. Further Information NA There are incentives in the form of recognition and career advancement opportunities that are used to reward superior performance on GHG and other sustainability initiatives. As an example, several members of the Sustainable Value Networks were awarded o NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 1.1. Where is the highest level of responsibility for climate change within your company? There is no individual or committee with overall responsibility for climate change Other, lower level departments Board committee or other executive body
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 1.1a . Please specify who is responsible. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 1.2. What is the mechanism by which the board committee or other executive body reviews the company’s progress and status regarding climate change? NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 1.3a. Please explain how overall responsibility for climate change is managed within your company. NA Walmart developed 13 Sustainable Value Networks (SVNs) that integrate sustainable practices into every aspect of our business. The SVNs responsible for meeting climate-related goals are: the Greenhouse Gas Network, the Sustainable Buildings Network, the NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 1.3b. Please explain how overall responsibility for climate change is managed within your company. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 1.4. Do you provide incentives for the management of climate change issues, including the attainment of greenhouse gas (GHG) targets? NA Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 14. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 14. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 14.1. Do you consider that the grid average factors used to report Scope 2 emissions in question 13 reflect the contractual arrangements you have with electricity suppliers? NA Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 14.3. Explain the origin of the alternative figure including information about the emission factors used and the tariffs. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 16. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 16. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 16.1. Does the use of your goods and/or services enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party? NA Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 17.1. Please provide your total carbon dioxide emissions in metric tonnes CO2 from the combustion of biologically sequestered carbon i.e. carbon dioxide emissions from burning biomass/biofuels. NA 743 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 17.2. Please explain why not. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 19. Further Information NA Verification necessarily lags the current reporting year by a year. The attached verification report is for calendar years 2005 - 2008. From last years CICS Verification Report: "Final Verified Data / Verification Opinion Based on the Tier II verificati NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 19.2. Please explain why they have varied and why the variation is significant. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 2.1. Describe your company’s process for identifying significant risks and/or opportunities from climate change and assessing the degree to which they could affect your business, including the financial implications. NA Walmart’s process for identifying risks or opportunities is to continuously gather information from as broad a variety of sources as possible including: Home Office and field associates, industry contacts, consulting firms, government organizations and NG NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 20.1A Index NA 44 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 20.1B. I have attached an external verification statement that covers the following scopes: NA Scope 1; Scope 2 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 20.1C3. Scope 3 (Q15.1) NA Not verified NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 21. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 21.3. What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? NA Although not currently trading under the schemes, in April 2010, Walmart divisions in the UK and in Japan, came under the requirements of two different emission trading schemes. The UK trading scheme is the Carbon Reduction Commitment (CRC), a new carbon NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 21.4. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? No No Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 22. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2010/02/20402/Investor CDP 2010/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2010/Communications/2010_Annual_Report.pdf NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 22.1. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change/GHG emissions in other places than in your CDP response? NA Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 22.2. In your Annual Reports or other mainstream filing? (If so, please attach your latest publication(s).) NA Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 22.3. Through voluntary communications such as CSR reports? (If so, please attach your latest publication(s).) NA Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 3. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2010/02/20402/Investor CDP 2010/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2010/RisksOpportunities-RegulatoryRisks/WMT 2010 GHG Goals and Progress.doc NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 3.1. Do current and/or anticipated regulatory requirements related to climate change present significant risks to your company? NA Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 3.3. Describe the ways in which the identified risks affect or could affect your business and your value chain. NA The primary means through which these regulatory risks could affect our business and value chain involve increased costs and process changes as more fully described in the paragraph below: NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 3.4. Are there financial implications associated with the identified risks? NA Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 4. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 4. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 4.1. Do current and/or anticipated physical impacts of climate change present significant risks to your company? NA Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 4.2B. What are the current and/or anticipated significant physical risks, and their associated countries/regions and timescales? NA There are potential impacts from climate change that could present significant risks to Walmart. A partial list of some of these physical risks include: • Increased frequency and duration of storms • Sea level rise • Flooding • Temperature change • NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 4.3. Describe the ways in which the identified risks affect or could affect your business and your value chain. NA Some of the ways the identified risks could affect our business, value chain, and customers include: increased personal safety hazards, increased personal health issues for customers and associates, property damage, operational hazards, operations disrupt NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 4.5. Please describe them. NA In the future, there could be localized effects from the events described above that could curtail operations, hamper supply chain, cause supply shortages or prevent customers from accessing our stores, all of which could result in sales decreases or cost NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 4.6. Describe any actions the company has taken or plans to take to manage or adapt to the risks that have been identified, including the cost of those actions. NA While we constantly monitor our facilities in real time, at this time, we are currently unable to identify any specific physical risks that rise to a level that would enable commercial action. Although the company has no specific process for identifying NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 4.7. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to significant physical risks - current and/or anticipated. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 4.8. Please explain why not. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 5. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 5. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 5.1. Does climate change present other significant risks - current and/or anticipated - for your company? NA No NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 5.6. Describe any actions the company has taken or plans to take to manage or adapt to the other risks that have been identified, including the costs of those actions. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 5.8. Please explain why not. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 6.1. Do current and/or anticipated regulatory requirements related to climate change present significant opportunities for your company? NA Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 6.3. Describe the ways in which the identified opportunities affect or could affect your business and your value chain. NA A carbon premium could alter consumer purchasing habits and spur innovative low carbon product development. This could change the products our customers choose to purchase, how we serve our customers, what we are able to offer them, and the way our suppl NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 6.4. Are there financial implications associated with the identified opportunities? NA Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 6.5. Please describe them. NA As an example, we had a goal to sell 100 million compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFLs) at Walmart and Sam’s Club locations by the end of 2007. We exceeded this goal and sold 137 million CFLs in the original timeframe we had established to sell 100 milli NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 6.6. Describe any actions the company has taken or plans to take to exploit the opportunities that have been identified, including the investment needed to take those actions. NA Walmart established the following goals for product efficiencies: REGION: U.S. GOAL: Double the sale of products in the U.S. that help make homes more energy efficient by 2011 (2008 Baseline). PROGRESS: Products falling under this category include caulk, NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 6.8. Please explain why not. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 7. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 7.1. Do current and/or anticipated physical impacts of climate change present significant opportunities for your company? NA No NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 7.3. Describe the ways in which the identified opportunities affect or could affect your business and your value chain. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 7.4. Are there financial implications associated with the identified opportunities? NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 7.8. Please explain why not. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 8. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2010/02/20402/Investor CDP 2010/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2010/RisksOpportunities-OtherOpportunities/Sustainable Product Index Fact Sheet.pdf NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 8. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 8.1. Does climate change present other significant opportunities - current and/or anticipated - for your company? NA Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 8.2B. What are the current and/or anticipated other significant opportunities and their associated countries/regions and timescales? NA Beyond opportunities managing our own footprint, many of our opportunities will come through managing the carbon and energy costs associated with our supply chain and those of our customers. Pursuing these initiatives is in keeping with our mission of sa NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 8.3. Describe the ways in which the identified opportunities affect or could affect your business and your value chain. NA The Supply Chain GHG Innovation Program is expected to remove GHG, energy, and inefficiencies from the raw material sourcing, manufacture, transportation, use, and disposal of products resulting in lower life cycle costs to our customers. The Index is ex NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 8.4. Are there financial implications associated with the identified opportunities? NA Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 8.5. Please describe them. NA For the Supply Chain GHG Innovation Program - if this reduction were to come solely from electricity efficiencies and the avoided electricity costs were $0.10/kWh, the financial implications of these cost savings would be in excess of $2.5 billion. There NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 8.6. Describe any actions the company has taken or plans to take to exploit the opportunities that have been identified, including the investment needed to take those actions. NA For the Supply Chain GHG Innovation Program – Walmart has assembled a team of internal and external experts. We have identified likely high carbon product lines that should yield above average reductions by concentrating our efforts in these areas and wo NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 8.7. Explain why you do not consider your company to be presented with significant opportunities - current and/or anticipated. NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 9. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 9.1. Please describe how your overall group business strategy links with actions taken on risks and opportunities (identified in questions 3 to 8), including any emissions reduction targets or achievements, public policy engagement and external communicat NA Sustainability is inextricably embedded within our overall business strategy and carbon reduction is a key element of our sustainability program. Our overarching goals to: • Be supplied 100 percent by renewable energy; • Create zero waste; and • Sell pr NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 9.10. Do you engage with policy makers on possible responses to climate change including taxation, regulation and carbon trading? NA Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 9.11. Please describe. NA Walmart engages with policymakers at all levels on climate change with testimony before Congress, conversations with government officials and NGOs, as well as numerous public statements. Our goal is to act as a partner with government, providing a lens i NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 9.2. Do you have a current emissions reduction target? NA Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 9.3. Please explain why not and forecast how your Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions will change over the next 5 years. (If you do not have a target) NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 9.5. Please explain if you intend to set a new target. (If you have had a target and the date for completing it fell within your reporting year, please answer questions 9.5 and 9.6) NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 9.a Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2010/02/20402/Investor CDP 2010/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2010/Strategy-Targets/WMT 2010 GHG Goals and Progress.doc NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 9.a Further Information NA Walmart has numerous aggressive GHG reduction and energy efficiency goals, few of which provide meaningful information or comparisons when forced into the format provided. For a complete listing of GHG/efficiency goals and progress, please see the attach NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data 9.b Further Information NA Walmart has undertaken literally thousands of efficiency projects and initiatives in our domestic and international operations, as well as in our supply chain. These projects affect electricity, natural gas, refrigerant and transportation fuel usages. W NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data Comms Index NA 44 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data Emissions 14 Index NA 44 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data Emissions 16 Index NA 44 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data Emissions 21 Index NA 44 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data Governance Index NA 44 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data Risks&Opps 2 Index NA 44 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data Risks&Opps 3 Index NA 44 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data Risks&Opps 5 Index NA 44 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data Risks&Opps 8 Index NA 44 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2010 Full Data Strategy 9 (3) Index NA 44 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data Click here to see the 46 items available from this source
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 1.1. Where is the highest level of direct responsibility for climate change within your company? Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 1.2. Do you provide incentives for the management of climate change issues, including the attainment of targets? Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 11.1. Do you consider that the grid average factors used to report Scope 2 emissions in Question 8.3 reflect the contractual arrangements you have with electricity suppliers? No
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 11.1a. You may report a total contractual Scope 2 figure in response to this question. Please provide your total global contractual Scope 2 GHG emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e Answered
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 11.1b. Explain the basis of the alternative figure (see guidance) Answered
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 11.2. Has your organization retired any certificates, e.g. Renewable Energy Certificates, associated with zero or low carbon electricity within the reporting year or has this been done on your behalf? Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 13.1. How do your absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year compare to the previous year? Increased
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 13.1a If absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) have increased, decreased or remained the same overall compared to the previous year, state direction of change Slightly Increased
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 14.1. Do you participate in any emission trading schemes? No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next two years
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 14.1b. What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? No Response
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 14.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? No
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 2.1. Please select the option that best describes your risk management procedures with regard to climate change risks and opportunities Integrated into multi-disciplinary company wide risk management processes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 2.1a. Please provide further details (see guidance) Answered
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes (see guidance) Answered
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 2.2b. Please explain why not No Response
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 2.3. Do you engage with policy makers to encourage further action on mitigation and/or adaptation? Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 2.3a. Please explain (i) the engagement process and (ii) actions you are advocating Answered
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 3.1. Did you have an emissions reduction target that was active (ongoing or reached completion) in the reporting year? Absolute and intensity targets
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 3.1e. Please explain (i) why not; and (ii) forecast how your emissions will change over the next five years No Response
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 3.2. Does the use of your goods and/or services directly enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party? Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 3.2a. Please provide details (see guidance) Answered
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 3.3. Did you have emissions reduction initiatives that were active within the reporting year (this can include those in the planning and/or implementation phases) Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 3.3b. What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities? Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities. 7
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 3.3c. If you do not have any emissions reduction initiatives, please explain why not No Response
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 5.1. Have you identified any climate change risks (current or future) that have potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 5.1a. Climate change risks driven by changes in regulation Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 5.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions Answered
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 5.1c. Climate change risks driven by change in physical climate parameters Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 5.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions Answered
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 5.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; (iii) the costs associated with these actions Answered
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 5.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure No Response
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 5.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure No Response
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 5.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure No Response
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 6.1a. Please describe your opportunities that are driven by changes in regulation Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 6.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions Answered
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 6.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions Answered
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 6.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions Answered
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 6.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure No Response
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 6.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure No Response
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 6.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure No Response
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 8.6. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 1 emissions NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data 8.7. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 2 emissions NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data Carbon disclosure score 0 85 100 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data Carbon performance band E B A NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2011 Full Data Management 4. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? 5
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data Click here to see the 66 items available from this source
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 0.1. Introduction - Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. NA Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (NYSE: WMT), or “Walmart,” serves customers and members more than 200 million times per week at 10,130 retail units under 69 different banners in 27 countries, supported by distribution, logistics, and sourcing operations in these 27 NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 0.4. Currency selection Please select the currency in which you would like to submit your response. All financial information contained in the response should be in this currency. NA USD($) NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 1. Further Information NA 2011 Annual Report, pg. 13. Letter from Rob Walton, Chairman of the Board describing the Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee's oversight of sustainability initiatives: http://walmartstores.com/sites/annualreport/2011/financials/Walmart_2011 NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 1.1. Where is the highest level of direct responsibility for climate change within your company? No individual or committee with overall responsibility for climate change Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 1.1a. Please identify the position of the individual or name of the committee with this responsibility No Response Approved and announced in October 2010, as stated in our 2011 annual report, the Walmart Board of Directors changed its charter to formalize the Compensation, Nominating, and Governance Committee of the Board’s oversight for sustainability and corporate r Answered NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 1.2. Do you provide incentives for the management of climate change issues, including the attainment of targets? No Yes Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 11. Attachments NA NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 11. Further Information NA NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 11.1. Do you consider that the grid average factors used to report Scope 2 emissions in Question 8.3 reflect the contractual arrangements you have with electricity suppliers? No No Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 11.1a. You may report a total contractual Scope 2 figure in response to this question. Please provide your total global contractual Scope 2 GHG emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 0 15199767 17902000 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 11.2. Has your organization retired any certificates, e.g. Renewable Energy Certificates, associated with zero or low carbon electricity within the reporting year or has this been done on your behalf? No Response Yes Answered NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 13. Attachments NA NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 13. Further Information NA NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 13.1. How do your absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year compare to the previous year? Increased Increased Decreased NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 13.1a (i) If absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) have increased, decreased or remained the same overall compared to the previous year, state direction of change Significant Increase Slightly Increased Significant Decrease NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 13.1a (ii) If absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) have increased, decreased or remained the same overall compared to the previous year, state the reason for the direction of change NA Decrease: Change in output, Increase: Emissions reduction activities, Increase: Acquisitions, Decrease: Acquisitions, Increase: Divestment, Decrease: Change in output NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 14. Attachments NA NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 14. Further Information NA NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 14.1. Do you participate in any emission trading schemes? No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next two years No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next two years Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 14.1b. What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 14.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? No No Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 2. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/02/20402/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/2.Strategy/SVN Structure 2012.JPG NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 2.1. Please select the option that best describes your risk management procedures with regard to climate change risks and opportunities There are no documented processes for assessing and managing risks and opportunities from climate change Integrated into multi-disciplinary company wide risk management processes Integrated into multi-disciplinary company wide risk management processes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 2.2. Is climate change integrated into your business strategy? No Yes Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes (see guidance) NA Walmart’s Sustainability 360 process takes a comprehensive view of our business by engaging more than 100,000 suppliers, 2.2 million associates, and hundreds of millions of customers around the world in our efforts. Sustainability 360 lives in every corne NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 2.2b. Please explain why not NA NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 2.3. Do you engage with policy makers to encourage further action on mitigation and/or adaptation? No Yes Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 2012 Performance Band E B A NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 2012 Score 0 86 100 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 3. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/02/20402/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/3.TargetsandInitiatives/Walmart FY2012 Global Responsibility Report.pdf NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 3.1. Did you have an emissions reduction target that was active (ongoing or reached completion) in the reporting year? No Absolute and intensity targets Absolute and intensity targets NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 3.1e. Please explain (i) why not; and (ii) forecast how your emissions will change over the next five years NA NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 3.2. Does the use of your goods and/or services directly enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party? No Yes Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 3.2a. Please provide details (see guidance) NA Our Supplier Energy Efficiency Program has acted as a service to participating suppliers to help them reduce energy in their operations by installing more energy efficient equipment and controls. Since the program began in 2007, it has removed approximat NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 3.3c Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities. 0 7 12 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 3.3c. What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities? NA Compliance with regulatory requirements/standards, Dedicated budget for energy efficiency, Dedicated budget for low carbon product R&D, Employee engagement, Employee engagement, Financial optimization calculations, Internal finance mechanisms NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 5. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/02/20402/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/5.ClimateChangeRisks/ar4_syr.pdf NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 5.1a Identified risks driven by changes in regulation? NA NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 5.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA ID 1: (i) State or regional legislation related to cap-and-trade schemes potentially have financial implications for Walmart, similar to those that would be possible under a national cap-and-trade scheme (which now appears unlikely). Increased utility ex NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 5.1c Identified climate change risks driven by change in physical climate parameters? NA Yes NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 5.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA ID 1: (i) The extent and nature of potential effects from a change in global mean temperature are uncertain, but they could range from increased energy usage or cost in our operations to increased costs for our suppliers and customers. At this time, we ha NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 5.1e Identified climate change risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments? NA Yes NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 5.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA ID 1: (i) Consumer changes in the products they select could affect demand for goods and services. Because this is a long-term risk with unpredictable implications from climate change, we have not yet measured the potential effect as it relates specifical NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 5.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 5.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 5.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 6. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/02/20402/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/6.ClimateChangeOpportunities/Cold Water Wash Substantiation.docx NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 6. Further Information NA The BrandZ 2012 report on the world’s most valuable brands is available here: http://www.millwardbrown.com/BrandZ/Top_100_Global_Brands.aspx NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply No Opportunities driven by changes in regulation; Opportunities driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 6.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA ID 1: (i) The specific financial implications of an international agreement on climate change depend greatly on the structure (taxation versus cap-and-trade schemes) and scope (which industries are regulated) of the agreement and the way it is carried out NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 6.1c Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in physical climate parameters? NA Yes NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 6.1e Identified opportunities that are driven by changes in other climate-related developments? NA Yes NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 6.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA ID 1: (i) While it is difficult to correlate Walmart’s emphasis on climate change mitigation with a specific portion of our brand value, we believe strongly that we owe it to our customers, suppliers, associates, and communities to lead the way on reducin NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 8.1. Please select the boundary you are using for your Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas inventory NA NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 8.2. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e for 2009 - 01 Jul 2009 - 30 Jun 2010 reporting period 0 5967127 35559440 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 8.3. Please provide your gross global Scope 2 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e for 2009 - 01 Jul 2009 - 30 Jun 2010 reporting period 0 5967127 35559440 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 8.4. Are there are any sources (e.g. facilities, specific GHGs, activities, geographies, etc.) of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions which are not included in your disclosure? No No Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 8.6. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 1 emissions More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% NA More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 8.7. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 2 emissions More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% NA More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 8.8. Are carbon dioxide emissions from the combustion of biologically sequestered carbon (i.e. carbon dioxide emissions from burning biomass/biofuels) relevant to your company? No Yes Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data 8.8a. Please provide the emissions in metric tonnes CO2e 0 12825 27263000 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data End of Scope 2 Reporting Period 12/31/2011 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data Management 4. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/02/20402/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/4.Communication/Walmart FY2012 Global Responsibility Report.pdf NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data Management 4. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? NA 4 NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data Reported gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e for 2013 reporting period? Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2012 Full Data Reported gross global Scope 2 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e for 2013 reporting period? Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data Click here to see the 58 items available from this source
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 0. Attachments NA NA NA If you have not been presented with a sector module that you consider would be appropriate for your company to answer, please select the module below. If you wish to view the questions first, please see https://www.cdproject.net/en-US/Programmes/Pages/Mor
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 0.1. Introduction - Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. NA Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (NYSE: WMT), or “Walmart,” serves customers and members more than 200 million times per week at 10,700 retail units under 69 different banners in 27 countries, supported by distribution, logistics, and sourcing operations in these 27 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 0.4. Currency selection Please select the currency in which you would like to submit your response. All financial information contained in the response should be in this currency. USD($)
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 0.6. Modules NA As part of the Investor CDP information request, electric utilities, companies with electric utility activities or assets, companies in the automobile or auto component manufacture sectors and companies in the oil and gas industry should complete suppleme
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 1.1. Where is the highest level of direct responsibility for climate change within your company? No individual or committee with overall responsibility for climate change Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 1.2. Do you provide incentives for the management of climate change issues, including the attainment of targets? No Yes Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 11. Attachments NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 11. Further Information NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 11.1. What percentage of your total operational spend in the reporting year was on energy? More than 0% but less than or equal to 5% More than 0% but less than or equal to 5% More than 95% but less than or equal to 100%
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 12. Further Information NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 12.1. How do your absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year compare to the previous year? Increased
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 14.1. Do you participate in any emission trading schemes? No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next two years No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next 2 years Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 14.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? No No Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 2. Attachments NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 2.1. Please select the option that best describes your risk management procedures with regard to climate change risks and opportunities No Response Integrated into multi-disciplinary company wide risk management processes Integrated into multi-disciplinary company wide risk management processes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 2.2. Is climate change integrated into your business strategy? No Yes Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes (see guidance) NA Walmart’s Sustainability 360 process takes a comprehensive view of our business by engaging more than 100,000 suppliers, 2.2 million associates, and hundreds of millions of customers around the world in our efforts. Sustainability 360 lives in every corne NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 2.2b. Please explain why not NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 2.3. Do you engage in activities that could either directly or indirectly influence policy on climate change through any of the following? (tick all that apply) Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 2.3a. Please explain (i) the engagement process and (ii) actions you are advocating NA We promoted energy efficiency and other GHG reduction activities through regulatory policy dockets, public speaking, and legislative activity in 2012. Walmart regularly participates in state utility commission-ordered working groups that submit suggestio NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 2.3b. Are you on the Board of any trade associations or provide funding beyond membership? Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 2.3d. Do you publically disclose a list of all the research organizations that you fund? Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 2013 Performance Band E A- A NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 2013 Score 0 94 100 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 3. Further Information NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 3.2. Does the use of your goods and/or services directly enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party? No Yes Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 3.2a. Please provide details (see guidance) NA Selling Products that Help Customers Avoid Emissions: Select products sold in our stores globally have allowed our retail customers to reduce their energy use and the resulting greenhouse gases. We have been able to quantify results from a few of these NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 3.3c Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities. 0 8 13 Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities.
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 4. Attachments NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 4.1. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? 4 The number of corporate annual reports and voluntary publications (complete and/or underway) made about the company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 5. Attachments NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 5. Further Information NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 5.1. Have you identified any climate change risks (current or future) that have potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Risks driven by changes in regulation; Risks driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 5.1a. Climate change risks driven by changes in regulation Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 5.1c. Climate change risks driven by change in physical climate parameters Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 5.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA ID1 (i) The extent and nature of potential effects from a change in global mean temperature are uncertain, but they could range from increased energy usage or cost in our operations to increased costs for our suppliers and customers. At this time, we have NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 5.1e.Climate change risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 5.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA ID1 (i) Consumer changes in the products they select could affect demand for goods and services. Because this is a long-term risk with unpredictable implications from climate change, we have not yet measured the potential effect as it relates specifically NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 5.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 5.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 6. Further Information NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? -Transparency Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Opportunities driven by changes in regulation; Opportunities driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 6.1a Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in regulation? No Response Yes Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 6.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 7. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/sites/2013/02/20402/Investor CDP 2013/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2013/7.EmissionsMethodology/Walmart 2012 Emission Factors.xls NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 7. Further Information NA NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 8.2. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e for 2011 - 01 Jul 2011 - 30 Jun 2012 reporting period 0 0 133428139 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 8.2. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e for 2012 - 01 Jul 2012 - 30 Jun 2013 reporting period 0 5605099 256800000 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 8.3. Please provide your gross global Scope 2 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e for 2010 - 01 Jul 2010 - 30 Jun 2011 reporting period 0 0 34559597 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 8.3. Please provide your gross global Scope 2 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e for 2012 - 01 Jul 2012 - 30 Jun 2013 reporting period 0 5605099 256800000 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 8.4. Are there are any sources (e.g. facilities, specific GHGs, activities, geographies, etc.) of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions which are not included in your disclosure? No Response Yes Yes Proportion of Scope 1 emissions that are verified/assured for 2011 - 2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 8.8. Are carbon dioxide emissions from biologically sequestered carbon relevant to your organization? Yes
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data 8.8a. Please provide the emissions in metric tonnes CO2e 0 438 13638000
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data End of Scope 1 Reporting Period 12-31-2012 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data End of Scope 2 Reporting Period 12-31-2012 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data Reported gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e for 2013 reporting period? Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data Reported gross global Scope 2 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e for 2013 reporting period? Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data Click here to see the 62 items available from this source
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 0.1. Introduction - Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (NYSE: WMT), or “Walmart,” serves customers and members more than 250 million times per week at 10,942 retail units under 69 different banners in 27 countries, supported by distribution, logistics, and sourcing operations. Walmart wa NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 0.4. Currency selection Please select the currency in which you would like to submit your response. All financial information contained in the response should be in this currency. USD($) NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 1. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 1.1. Where is the highest level of direct responsibility for climate change within your company? Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 1.1a. Please identify the position of the individual or name of the committee with this responsibility Approved and announced in October 2010, as stated in our 2011 annual report, the Walmart Board of Directors changed its charter to formalize the Compensation, Nominating, and Governance Committee of the Board’s oversight for sustainability and corporate r NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 1.2. Do you provide incentives for the management of climate change issues, including the attainment of targets? Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 11. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 11. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 11.1. What percentage of your total operational spend in the reporting year was on energy? More than 0% but less than or equal to 5% NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 12. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 12. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 12.1. How do your absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year compare to the previous year? Increased NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 14. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 14. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 14.1. Do you participate in any emission trading schemes? No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next 2 years NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 14.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? No NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 2. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 2. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 2.1. Please select the option that best describes your risk management procedures with regard to climate change risks and opportunities Integrated into multi-disciplinary company wide risk management processes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 2.2. Is climate change integrated into your business strategy? Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes (see guidance) Walmart’s Sustainability 360 process takes a comprehensive view of our business by engaging more than 100,000 suppliers, 2.2 million associates, and hundreds of millions of customers around the world in our efforts. Sustainability 360 lives in every corne NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 2.2b. Please explain why not NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 2.3. Do you engage in activities that could either directly or indirectly influence policy on climate change through any of the following? (tick all that apply) Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 2.3b. Are you on the Board of any trade associations or provide funding beyond membership? Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 2.3d. Do you publically disclose a list of all the research organizations that you fund? Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 2013 score 94 A- 2013 score
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 2014 Performance Band E A A 2014 Performance Band
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 2014 Score 1 98 100 2014 Score
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 3. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 3. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 3.1. Did you have an emissions reduction target that was active (ongoing or reached completion) in the reporting year? Absolute and intensity targets NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 3.2. Does the use of your goods and/or services directly enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party? Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 3.2a. Please provide details (see guidance) Selling Products that Help Customers Avoid Emissions: Select products sold in our stores globally have allowed our retail customers to reduce their energy use and the resulting greenhouse gases. We have been able to quantify results from a few of these p NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 4. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 4. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? - Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 4.1. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? 4 The number of corporate annual reports and voluntary publications (complete and/or underway) made about the company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 5. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 5. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 5.1. Have you identified any climate change risks (current or future) that have potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Risks driven by changes in regulation; Risks driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 5.1. Have you identified any climate change risks (current or future) that have potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? -transparency Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 5.1a. Climate change risks driven by changes in regulation Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 5.1c. Climate change risks driven by change in physical climate parameters Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 5.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 6. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? -Transparency Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply Opportunities driven by changes in regulation; Opportunities driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 6.1c. Please describe the opportunities that are driven by changes in physical climate parameters Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 7. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 8.2. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e for 2013 - 01 Jul 2013 - 30 Jun 2014 reporting period 6501715 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 8.4. Are there are any sources (e.g. facilities, specific GHGs, activities, geographies, etc.) of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions which are not included in your disclosure? Yes Proportion of Scope 1 emissions that are verified/assured for 2011 - 2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data 8.9. Biogenically generated tonnes CO2e for 2013 - 01 Jul 2013 - 30 Jun 2014 reporting period 619 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data CDLI leader No Yes Yes The Climate Disclosure Leadership Index: A Company must: (1)   Make its response public and submit via CDP’s Online Response System (2) Achieve a score within the top 10% of the total regional sample population
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data Comment ŒŽ Comment
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data CPLI leader No Yes Yes The Climate Performance Leadership Inde: A company must: (1)Make its response public and submit via CDP’s Online Response System (2) Attain a performance score greater than (3) Disclose gross global Scope 1 and Scope 2 figures (4) Score maximum performanc
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data End of Scope 1 Reporting Period 12-31-2013 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data End of Scope 2 Reporting Period 12-31-2013 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data Reported gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e for 2013 reporting period? Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data Reported gross global Scope 2 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e for 2013 reporting period? Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data Scope 1 emissions 6501715 All greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions that are directly from sources that are owned or controlled by the reporting entity.
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data Target(s) reported abs int Absolute/Intensive
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data Ticker WMT Ticker
Carbon Disclosure Project 2014 Full Data Verification/ assurance 123 Audit and verification by a competent and independent organization that uses a standardized set of terms and methods.
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data Click here to see the 49 items available from this source
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 0. Further Information NA If you are in these sectors (according to the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS)), the corresponding sector modules will be marked as default options to your information request. If you want to query your classification, please email respond@c
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 0.1. Introduction - Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (NYSE: WMT), or “Walmart,” serves customers and members close to 260 million times per weekin 11,453 retail units under 69 different banners in 27 countries and through our websites globally,. Walmart was built on the foundation of s NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 0.6. Modules NA As part of the Investor CDP information request, electric utilities, companies with electric utility activities or assets, companies in the automobile or auto component manufacture sectors and companies in the oil and gas industry should complete suppleme
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 1. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 1.1. Where is the highest level of direct responsibility for climate change within your company? Board or individual/sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 1.1a. Please identify the position of the individual or name of the committee with this responsibility Approved and announced in October 2010, as stated in our 2011 annual report, the Walmart Board of Directors changed its charter to formalize the Compensation, Nominating, and Governance Committee of the Board’s oversight for sustainability and corporate r NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 1.2. Do you provide incentives for the management of climate change issues, including the attainment of targets? Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 11. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 12. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 12.1. How do your absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year compare to the previous year? Increased NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 12.1a Reason of change Emissions reduction activities Change in output Change in boundary Change in physical operating conditions NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 14. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 14. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 14.1. Do you participate in any emission trading schemes? No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next 2 years NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 14.1b. What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 14.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? No NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 2. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 2. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 2.1. Please select the option that best describes your risk management procedures with regard to climate change risks and opportunities Integrated into multi-disciplinary company wide risk management processes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 2.2. Is climate change integrated into your business strategy? Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes (see guidance) Walmart’s Global Responsbilitystrategy is comprised of three core elements, Opportunity, Community and Sustainability. Our Sustainability strategy takes a comprehensive view of our business by engaging oursuppliers, ssociates, and customers around the w NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 2.3. Do you engage in activities that could either directly or indirectly influence policy on climate change through any of the following? (tick all that apply) Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 2.3a. Please explain (i) the engagement process and (ii) actions you are advocating NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 2.3b. Are you on the Board of any trade associations or provide funding beyond membership? Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 2015 Disclosure score 96 2015 Score
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 2015 Performance band B 2015 Performance Band
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 3.1. Did you have an emissions reduction target that was active (ongoing or reached completion) in the reporting year? Absolute and intensity targets NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 3.1e. Please explain (i) why not; and (ii) forecast how your emissions will change over the next five years NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 3.2. Does the use of your goods and/or services directly enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party? Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 3.3c Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities. 8 Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities.
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 4. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 4.1. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? 3 The number of corporate annual reports and voluntary publications (complete and/or underway) made about the company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 5. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 5.1. Have you identified any climate change risks (current or future) that have potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? -transparency Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 5.1a. Climate change risks driven by changes in regulation Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 5.1c. Climate change risks driven by change in physical climate parameters Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 5.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 6. Attachments NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 6. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? -Transparency Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 6.1a Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in regulation? Yes NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 6.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 7. Attachments https://www.cdp.net/sites/2015/02/20402/Climate Change 2015/Shared Documents/Attachments/ClimateChange2015/CC7.EmissionsMethodology/Walmart_Emission Factors_CDP 2015_CY2014 GHG Inventory.xlsx NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 7. Further Information NA NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 8.2. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 2349.52 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 8.3.a. Please provide your gross global Scope 2 emissions figures in metric tonnes CO2e 29428.55 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 8.4. Are there are any sources (e.g. facilities, specific GHGs, activities, geographies, etc.) of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions which are not included in your disclosure? No Proportion of Scope 1 emissions that are verified/assured for 2011 - 2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 8.6. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your reported Scope 1 emissions 100 NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2015 Full Data 8.9. Are carbon dioxide emissions from biologically sequestered carbon relevant to your organization? Yes NA
CDP Water Data 2013 Click here to see the 56 items available from this source
CDP Water Data 2013 0.4. Are there any geographies, activities, facilities or types of water inputs/outputs within this boundary which are not included in your disclosure? Yes
CDP Water Data 2013 0.4a. List of Exclusions & Reason for Exclusions-Transparency & Reporting 2 answers
CDP Water Data 2013 0.4a. List of Exclusions & Reason for Exclusions-Transparency & Reporting (value) NA
CDP Water Data 2013 1.1. Does your company have a water policy, strategy or management plan? No Yes Yes
CDP Water Data 2013 1.1a. Please describe your policy, strategy or plan, including the highest level of responsibility for it within your company and its geographical reach-Transaprency & Reporting Australia/CCA's Water Policy covers all aspects of water related operations activities from both municipal and groundwater sources across the beverage and food businesses. NA United States of America/We have a philosophy to limit water waste and a strategy to identify reduction opportunities from development through operations through supply chain. We build our stores to green building standards (LEED and Green Globes), and e
CDP Water Data 2013 1.1b. Does the water policy, strategy or plan specify water-related targets or goals? Yes
CDP Water Data 2013 1.1c. Description of Target/goal, its type and geographical reach -Transparency & Reporting 2 answers
CDP Water Data 2013 1.1d. You may explain here why your company does not have a water policy, strategy or plan and if you intend to put one in place. NA
CDP Water Data 2013 1.2. What specific actions has your company taken to manage water resources or engage stakeholders in water-related issues and what are their outcomes?-Transparency & Reporting 2 answers
CDP Water Data 2013 1.2. What specific actions has your company taken to manage water resources or engage stakeholders in water-related issues and what are their outcomes?-Transparency & Reporting (value) NA
CDP Water Data 2013 2.1. Are any of your operations located in water-stressed regions? Yes
CDP Water Data 2013 2.1a. Please specify the method(s) you use to characterize water-stressed regions- Environmental policy & Reporting Other
CDP Water Data 2013 2.1a. Please specify the method(s) you use to characterize water-stressed regions- Environmental policy & Reporting (value) NA
CDP Water Data 2013 2.1b. Please list the water-stressed regions where you have operations and the percentage of your total operations in that area-Transparency & Reporting 2 answers
CDP Water Data 2013 2.2b. You may explain here why you do not wish to report or why you do not use other indicators to identify which of your operations are located in regions subject to water-related risk. NA
CDP Water Data 2013 2.3. Please specify the total proportion of your operations that are located in the regions at risk which you identified in questions 2.1 and/or 2.2. 0.0 21.9 99.0
CDP Water Data 2013 2.4. The basis to use to calculate the percentages used for questions 2.1 and/or 2.2 2 answers
CDP Water Data 2013 2.4. The basis to use to calculate the percentages used for questions 2.1 and/or 2.3 (value) NA
CDP Water Data 2013 2.5. Do any of your key inputs or raw materials (excluding water) come from regions subject to water-related risk? Yes
CDP Water Data 2013 3.1. Is your company exposed to water-related risks (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure? Yes
CDP Water Data 2013 3.1a. Please describe the current and/or future risks to your operations, the ways in which these risks affect or could affect your operations and your current or proposed strategies for managing them-Transparency & Reporting NA
CDP Water Data 2013 3.1b. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to any water-related risks that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure. NA
CDP Water Data 2013 3.2. Country or geographical scale-Environment Policy & Reporting Facility
CDP Water Data 2013 3.2. What methodology do you use to analyze water-related risk across your operations?-Transparency & Reporting Answered
CDP Water Data 2013 3.2. What methodology do you use to analyze water-related risk across your operations? Water audits conducted at the L&T campuses combined with the internal know how.
CDP Water Data 2013 3.3. Do you require your key suppliers to report on their water use, risks and management? No
CDP Water Data 2013 3.4. Is your supply chain exposed to water-related risks (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure? Yes
CDP Water Data 2013 4.1. Please describe any detrimental impacts to business related to water your company has faced in the past five years, their financial impacts and whether they have resulted in any changes to company practices- Transparency & Reporting Answered
CDP Water Data 2013 5.1. Do water-related issues present opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure? Yes
CDP Water Data 2013 5.1a. Please describe the current and/or future opportunities, the ways in which these opportunities affect or could affect your operations and your current or proposed strategies for exploiting them-Environmental Policy & Reporting 3 answers
CDP Water Data 2013 5.1c. Please explain why you do not know whether water-related issues present opportunities to your company that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure. NA
CDP Water Data 2013 6.1. Has your company identified any linkages or trade-offs between water and carbon emissions in its operations or supply chain? Yes
CDP Water Data 2013 6.1a. Please describe the linkages or trade-offs between water and carbon emissions in its operations or supply chain?--Transparency & Reporting 2 answers
CDP Water Data 2013 7.1. Are you able to provide data, whether measured or estimated, on water withdrawals within your operations? Yes
CDP Water Data 2013 7.1a. Please report the water withdrawals within your operations for the reporting year-Transparency & Reporting 0
CDP Water Data 2013 7.1a. Please report the water withdrawals within your operations for the reporting year-Transparency & Reporting (value) 0
CDP Water Data 2013 7.1b. Please explain why you are not able to provide data for water withdrawals. NA
CDP Water Data 2013 7.2. Are you able to provide data, whether measured or estimated, on water recycling/reuse within your operations? Yes
CDP Water Data 2013 7.2a. Please report the water recycling/reuse within your operations for the reporting year-Transparency & Reporting 3 answers
CDP Water Data 2013 7.2b. Please explain why you are not able to provide data for water recycling/reuse within your operations-Transparency & Reporting No Response
CDP Water Data 2013 7.2b. Please explain why you are not able to provide data for water recycling/reuse within your operations. NA
CDP Water Data 2013 7.3. Please use this space to describe the methodologies used for questions 7.1 and 7.2 or to report withdrawals or recycling/reuse in a different format to that set out above-Transparency & Reporting Answered
CDP Water Data 2013 7.4. Are any water sources significantly affected by your company's withdrawal of water? No
CDP Water Data 2013 7.4b. You may explain here why your company's withrawal of water does not significantly affect any water sources-Transparency & reporting Answered
CDP Water Data 2013 7.4c. Please explain why you do not know if any water sources are significantly affected by your company's withdrawal of water. NA
CDP Water Data 2013 8.1. Are you able to identify discharges of water from your operations by destination, by treatment method and by quantity and quality using standard effluent parameters? Yes
CDP Water Data 2013 8.2. Did your company pay any penalties or fines for significant breaches of discharge agreements or regulations in the reporting period? Yes NA
CDP Water Data 2013 8.2a. Please describe the quality, quantity and destination of the water that was the subject of the significant breach(es), the associated fines and any actions taken to minimise the risk of future non-compliance NA NA
CDP Water Data 2013 8.3. Are any water bodies and related habitats significantly affected by discharges of water or runoff from your operations? No NA
CDP Water Data 2013 8.3b. You may explain here why your company's discharge of water does not significantly affect any water bodies or associated habitats. The water consumption and discharge intensities of our facilities are relatively low. Most of our stores are located in areas with access to municipal sewage treatment services. The stores located near water bodies, such as lakes, rivers or seas or close NA
CDP Water Data 2013 8.3b. You may explain here why your company's discharge of water does not significantly affect any water bodies or related habitats-Tansparency & Reporting Answered NA
CDP Water Data 2013 8.3c. Please explain why you do not know if any water bodies and associated habitats are significantly affected by discharge of water or runoff from your operations. NA NA
CDP Water Data 2013 9.1. Please provide any available financial intensity values for your company's water use across its operations 2 answers NA
CDP Water Data 2013 9.1. Please provide any available financial intensity values for your company's water use across its operations (value) NA NA
CDP Water Data 2013 9.2. Please provide any available water intensity values for your company's products or services across its operations. NA NA
CDP Water Data 2013 Please enter the name of the individual that has signed off (approved) the response and their job title Greg Trimble, Sr. Director, Global Energy Development and Reporting, Wal-Mart Stores Inc. NA
CDP Water Data 2014 Click here to see the 48 items available from this source
CDP Water Data 2014 GICS Industry Group Food & Staples Retailing NA
CDP Water Data 2014 GICS Sub-Industry Hypermarkets & Super Centers NA
CDP Water Data 2014 Public Public NA
CDP Water Data 2014 Response Account No Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. NA
CDP Water Data 2014 Response Organisation NA 20402 NA NA
CDP Water Data 2014 Secondary Expansions Water Global 500,Water Pilot Scored,Water S&P 500, NA
CDP Water Data 2014 Submitted Date 2014-10-01T01:08:01+01:00 NA
CDP Water Data 2014 Version 12.39 NA
CDP Water Data 2014 W0.1. Introduction Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (NYSE: WMT), or “Walmart,” serves customers and members more than 250 million times per week at 10,942 retail units under 69 different banners in 27 countries, supported by distribution, logistics, and sourcing operations. Walmart wa
CDP Water Data 2014 W0.2. Reporting Year 2013-01-01
CDP Water Data 2014 W1.1. Please rate the importance (current and future) of water quality and water quantity to the success of your organization Direct use: sufficient amounts of good quality freshwater available for use across your own operations/Vital for operations, Direct use: sufficient amounts of recycled, brackish and/or produced water available for use across your own operations/Important,
CDP Water Data 2014 W1.2. Have you evaluated how water quality and water quantity affects /could affect the success (viability, constraints) of your organization's growth strategy? Not evaluated Yes, evaluated over the next 10 years Yes, evaluated over the next 10 years
CDP Water Data 2014 W1.2a. Please explain how your organization evaluated the effects of water quality and water quantity on the success (viability, constraints) of your organization's growth strategy? All Walmart locations were mapped in context of baseline water stress, baseline water quality and long-term change in water stress. ISciences L.L.C. performed the hydrological modelling of water-stress using multiple internationally recognized water risk
CDP Water Data 2014 W1.2b. What is the main reason for not having evaluated how water quality and water quantity affects /could affect the success (viability, constraints) of your organization's growth strategy, and are there any plans in place to do so in the future? No Response
CDP Water Data 2014 W1.3. Has your organization experienced any detrimental impacts related to water in the reporting period? Yes
CDP Water Data 2014 W1.3a. ​Please describe the detrimental impacts experienced by your organization related to water in the reporting period Higher operating costs/Tighter supplier performance standards/We had an increase in water payments of 1.2% vs last year. Which represents 5 million pesos., Higher operating costs/Establish site-specific targets/Cost of water supplied from water trucks is
CDP Water Data 2014 W2.1. ​Please select the option that best describes your procedures with regard to assessing water risks and provide an explanation as to why this option is suitable for your organization Water risk assessments undertaken independently of other risk assessments incorporating both direct operations and supply chain
CDP Water Data 2014 W2.1a. ​You may provide additional information about your approach to assessing water risks here Walmart stores and distribution locations were mapped in context of the current and future projections for both water stress and quality. We also used an assessment framework based on physical, regulatory and reputational risks for each market. We plan to
CDP Water Data 2014 W2.2. ​Please state how frequently you undertake water risk assessments, what geographical scale and how far into the future you consider NA 0 NA
CDP Water Data 2014 W2.4. Which of the following contextual issues are always factored into your organization's water risk assessments? Current water availability and quality parameters at a local level/Relevant, included/These are the two parameters that greatly affect our operation., Current water regulatory frameworks and tariffs at a local level/Relevant, included/Understanding regula
CDP Water Data 2014 W2.4a. Which of the following stakeholders are always factored into your organization's water risk assessments? Customers/Relevant, not yet included/, Employees/Relevant, not yet included/, Investors/Relevant, not yet included/, Local communities/Relevant, not yet included/, NGOs/Relevant, included/Walmart engages stakeholders from government and respected internat
CDP Water Data 2014 W2.5. ​Do you require your key suppliers to report on their water use, risks and management? No Yes Yes
CDP Water Data 2014 W2.5a. ​Please provide the proportion of key suppliers you require to report on their water use, risks and management 0 26-50 76-100
CDP Water Data 2014 W2.5b. ​Please choose the option that best explains why you do not require your key suppliers to report on their water use, risks and management No Response
CDP Water Data 2014 W3.1. ​Is your organization exposed to water risks, either current and/or future, that could generate a substantive change in your business, operations, revenue or expenditure? Yes, direct operations and supply chain
CDP Water Data 2014 W3.2. ​Please provide details as to how your organization defines substantive change in your business, operations, revenue or expenditure from water risk Water risks are considered highly location specific and therefore exposure to water risk is not considered to generated a substantive changes for the entire corporation currently/or in the future. We recognize that there are certain portions of our operat
CDP Water Data 2014 W3.2a. ​The number of facilities in your direct operations exposed to water risks that could generate a substantive change in your business, operations, revenue or expenditure and either the proportion of cost of goods sold, global revenue or global produ /11-20/Other: % other – proportion of global operations located in this region./Other: Walmart facilities in Mexico are located in several regions that experience continued water stress. The most prominent river basins include the Mexico Valley and Lerma-
CDP Water Data 2014 W3.2c. The inherent risks that could generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure, the potential impact to your supply chain and the strategies to mitigate them NA
CDP Water Data 2014 W3.2d. ​Please choose the option that best explains why you do not consider your organization to be exposed to water risks in your direct operations that could generate a substantive change in your business, operations, revenue or expenditure NA No Response NA
CDP Water Data 2014 W4.1. ​Does water present strategic, operational or market opportunities that substantively benefit/have the potential to benefit your organization? Yes
CDP Water Data 2014 W4.1a. ​Please describe the opportunities water presents to your organization and your strategies to realize them Cost savings//Reduce dependency from water supply from municipality and variability of fees./4-6 years/Mexico, Increased brand value//New markets and consumers that seek ecological products. Increase of sales Reduce uncertainty on products supply/4-6 yea
CDP Water Data 2014 W4.1b. ​Please choose the option that best explains why water does not present your organization with any opportunities that have the potential to provide substantive benefit NA No Response NA
CDP Water Data 2014 W4.1c. ​Please choose the option that best explains why you do not know if water presents your organization with any opportunities that have the potential to provide substantive benefit NA No Response NA
CDP Water Data 2014 W5.2. For those facilities exposed to water risks that could generate a substantive change in your business, operations, revenue or expenditure, the number of which was reported in W3.2a, please detail which of the following water aspects are regularly me Water withdrawals- total volumes/76-100, Water withdrawals- volume by sources/Less than 1%, Water discharges- total volumes/1-25, Water discharges- volume by destination/, Water discharges- volume by treatment method/26-50, Water discharge quality data- q
CDP Water Data 2014 W5.4. ​Water discharge: for the reporting period, please provide the water accounting data for all facilities reported in W5.3 No Response
CDP Water Data 2014 W5.5. ​Water consumption: for the reporting period, please provide water consumption data for all facilities reported in W5.3 No Response
CDP Water Data 2014 W5.6. ​For the reporting period, please provide any available water intensity values for your organization's products or services across its operation No Response
CDP Water Data 2014 W5.7. ​For all facilities reported in W3.2a what proportion of their accounting data has been externally verified? Water withdrawals- total volumes/Not verified, Water withdrawals- volume by sources/Not verified, Water discharges- total volumes/Not verified, Water discharges- volume by destination/Not verified, Water discharges- volume by treatment method/Not verified
CDP Water Data 2014 W6.2. ​Is water management integrated into your business strategy? No Yes Yes
CDP Water Data 2014 W6.2a. ​Please choose the option(s) below that best explain how water has positively influenced your business strategy  NA 0 NA
CDP Water Data 2014 W6.2b. ​Please choose the option(s) below that best explains how water has negatively influenced your business strategy NA 0 NA
CDP Water Data 2014 W6.4. ​Water-related spending: % of total OPEX during this reporting period compared to last reporting period -0.5 0.0 120.0
CDP Water Data 2014 W7.1. ​Was your organization subject to any penalties and/or fines for breaches of abstraction licenses, discharge consents or other water and wastewater related regulations in the reporting period? Yes, significant No No
CDP Water Data 2014 W7.1b. ​Please indicate the total of all penalties and/or fines for breaches of abstraction licenses, discharge consents or other water and wastewater related regulations as a percentage of total operating expenditure (OPEX) compared to last year Much Higher NA Much Lower
CDP Water Data 2014 W8.1. ​Do you have any company wide targets (quantitative) or goals (qualitative) related to water? No No Yes, targets and goals
CDP Water Data 2014 W8.1b. ​Please describe any company wide qualitative goals (ongoing or reached completion during the reporting period) and your progress in achieving these No Response
CDP Water Data 2014 W9. ​Corresponding job category Energy manager
CDP Water Data 2014 W9. ​Job title Sr. Manager, Energy
Ceres Climate & Energy Resolutions 2011 Click here to see the 2 items available from this source
Ceres Climate & Energy Resolutions 2011 2011 Vote 2.0% 2.0% 92.8% % of votes, the resolutions are filed by some of the nation’s largest public pension funds, foundations, and religious, labor and socially responsible investors
Ceres Climate & Energy Resolutions 2011 Rating omitted filed withdrawn Shareholder resolutions filed by our investor network participants on sustainability-related issues that companies are facing
Climate Registry List of companies that have voluntarily committed to CR guidelines NA Yes Yes The Climate Registry is a nonprofit collaboration among North American states, provinces, territories and Native Sovereign Nations that sets consistent and transparent standards to calculate, verify and publicly report greenhouse gas emissions into a single registry. The Registry supports both voluntary and mandatory reporting programs and provides comprehensive, accurate data to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Covalence Ethical Quotient Click here to see the 4 items available from this source
Covalence Ethical Quotient EthicalQuote Rank 541 11 1 NA
Covalence Ethical Quotient Impact of Product 541 2 1 NA
Covalence Ethical Quotient Impact of Production 541 1 1 NA
Covalence Ethical Quotient Working Conditions 541 541 1 NA
The Center for Political Accountability 2011 Click here to see the 26 items available from this source
The Center for Political Accountability 2011 10. Disclose a detailed policy? 0 3 6
The Center for Political Accountability 2011 11. Policy to give only through PAC contributions? N
The Center for Political Accountability 2011 12. Policy contributions will promote the interests of the company, without regard for executives? 0 0 2
The Center for Political Accountability 2011 13. Describe proper recipients? 0 1 2
The Center for Political Accountability 2011 14. Describe its public policy positions? 0 0 2
The Center for Political Accountability 2011 15. Requires senior managers to have final authority? 0 1 2
The Center for Political Accountability 2011 16. Board of directors regularly oversees? 0 2 2
The Center for Political Accountability 2011 17. Board committee that reviews policy? 0 1 2
The Center for Political Accountability 2011 18. Board committee reviews political expenditures? 0 0 2
The Center for Political Accountability 2011 19. Board committee reviews trade associations and other? 0 0 2
The Center for Political Accountability 2011 2. Disclose payments to 527 groups? 0 0 4
The Center for Political Accountability 2011 20. Board committee approves political expenditures? 0 0 2
The Center for Political Accountability 2011 22. Report its political spending semiannually? 0 0 4
The Center for Political Accountability 2011 23. dedicated political disclosure web page? 0 0 2
The Center for Political Accountability 2011 24. disclose process for or affirmative statement on compliance? 0 0 2
The Center for Political Accountability 2011 3. Disclose independent political expenditures ? 0 0 4
The Center for Political Accountability 2011 4. Disclose payments to trade associations? 0 0 6
The Center for Political Accountability 2011 5. Disclose payments to other tax-exempt, 501(c)(4)s? 0 0 6
The Center for Political Accountability 2011 6. Disclose payments made by trade associations or other? 0 0 2
The Center for Political Accountability 2011 7. Disclose ballot measures payments? 0 0 4
The Center for Political Accountability 2011 8. Disclose senior managers who have final authority? 0 1 2
The Center for Political Accountability 2011 9. Disclose an archive? 0 0 4
The Center for Political Accountability 2011 Compliance/Oversight (Percent of Max 28 points) 0 0 100 NA
The Center for Political Accountability 2011 Disclosure (Percent of Max 23 points) 0 0 100 NA
The Center for Political Accountability 2011 Policies (Percent of Max 18 points) 0 22 100 NA
The Center for Political Accountability 2011 Score (100%) 0 21.4286 100 NA
CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2010 Click here to see the 5 items available from this source
CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2010 Corporate Governance Rank 100 NA 1 NA
CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2010 Employee Relations 750 NA 1 NA
CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2010 Human Rights Rank 100 9 1 NA
CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2010 Philanthropy Rank 100 1 1 NA
CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2010 Weighted Average Score 50 NA 300 NA
CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2011 Click here to see the 6 items available from this source
CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2011 Corporate Governance Rank 913 248 1
CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2011 Employee Relations 330 260 1
CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2011 Environmental Rank 276 185 1
CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2011 Financial Risk 968 127 1
CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2011 Rank 100 95 1
CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2011 Weighted Average Score 176.5 172.7 46.2
Div50 2009 DiversityBusiness.com Div50 2009 50 7 1 Rank on a list of companies selected as the most diverse by Diversity Business.
Div50 2011 DiversityBusiness.com Div50 2011 50 1 1 Rank on a list of companies selected as the most diverse by Diversity Business.
Div50 2013 DiversityBusiness.com Div50 2013 50 1 1 Rank on a list of companies selected as the most diverse by Diversity Business.
Div50 2014 DiversityBusiness.com Div50 2014 50 2 1 Rank on a list of companies selected as the most diverse by Diversity Business.
Div50 2015 DiversityBusiness.com Div50 2015 50 2 1 Rank on a list of companies selected as the most diverse by Diversity Business.
Diversity MBA Magazine Top 50 2010 50 Out Front Companies For Diverse Managers To Work 50 10 1 The goal of the 2010 Top 50 Companies for Diverse Managers to Work was to identify U.S.-based companies that seek to hire people of color and women managers because of the value they bring to the business.
Ethical Consumer Boycotts List Click here to see the 4 items available from this source
Ethical Consumer Boycotts List Called by Organic Consumers Association
Ethical Consumer Boycotts List Category Supply Chain
Ethical Consumer Boycotts List Description The Organic Consumers Association (OCA) are calling on people to boycott Wal-Mart and support commerce that was organic, local, fair trade and fair made
Ethical Consumer Boycotts List On Boycotts List Yes Yes
EDF Climate Corps 2014 EDF Climate Corps 2014 Yes Yes Participated during 2013
EDF Climate Corps 2015 EDF Climate Corps 2015 Yes Yes Participated during 2015
Environmental Investment Organisation Click here to see the 10 items available from this source
Environmental Investment Organisation Category No Public Data Red Public, Complete, and Verified data Companies are placed into one of four data or 'disclosure' categories: 1) Public, Complete, and Verified data; 2) Public, Complete, and Unverified data; 3) Public, Incomplete, Verified or Unverified data; 4) No Public Data
Environmental Investment Organisation Combined Scope 1+2+3 Intensity 12161.7 1380.2 34.2 Combined Scope 1+2_3 Intensity is calculated by adding together a company's Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions at 100% (disclosed or inferred) + 50% of Scope 3 emissions (disclosed or inferred).
Environmental Investment Organisation Global 800 Carbon Rank 800 722 1 Carbon Ranking of 800 international companies. Ranking is determined by EIO Methodology. See Source Info sheet for comments on it
Environmental Investment Organisation No. of Scope 3 Categories Reported 1 0 15 This column indicates the number of Scope 3 Categories reported. Once placed into one of the four Disclosure Categories, companies are ranked by the number of Scope 3 categories disclosed.
Environmental Investment Organisation North America 300 Carbon Rank 300 148 1 Carbon Ranking of North American companies. Ranking is determined by EIO Methodology. See Source Info sheet for comments on it
Environmental Investment Organisation Reported Scope 1+2 Total (tCO2e) 282000000 0 843 The total reported Scope 1 (all direct emissions) and Scope 2 (indirect electricity emissions) of the company in metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent (tCO2e) as defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol
Environmental Investment Organisation Reported Scope 3 Intensity 8547.1 0.0 0.0 Scope 3 Intensity is calculated by dividing the Reported Scope 3 figure by the company's turnover. Where no Scope 3 is reported, this is recorded as "No Data"
Environmental Investment Organisation Scope 1 & 2 Benchmark Company No No Yes Scope 1 & 2 Benchmark Companies. These companies act as benchmarks to derive inferred values; the values are the highest reported carbon intensity for that industy sector.
Environmental Investment Organisation Scope 3 Benchmark Company No No Yes Scope 3 Benchmark Companies. Reported figures of benchmark companies act as inferred values. These figures are the highest reported Scope 3 carbon intensity for that industy sector.
Environmental Investment Organisation Scope 3 Disclosure Leader Award No No Yes ET Scope 3 Disclosure Leaders. For 2011, this award has been given to comapnies disclosing five or more Scope 3 categories as defined by the Greenhous Gas protocol
Ekobai B2B Directory Click here to see the 2 items available from this source
Ekobai B2B Directory CSRHub-assigned score 55% 60% 75% Score derived by CSRHub based on certification data gathered by Ekobai.
Ekobai B2B Directory Description Our store locator will help you find Asda stores all over the country and provides lots of details about each one. To find a store simply enter a town name city or postcode into the search box below and press Enter. Description of the company's product.
Equal Opportunity 2010 Equal Opportunity top 50 companies 2010 50 6 1 Rank on the Equal Opportunity 2010 List.
Equal Opportunity 2011 Equal Opportunity top 50 companies 2011 50 13 1 Rank on the Equal Opportunity 2011 List.
ET Global Index Click here to see the 9 items available from this source
ET Global Index Combined Scope 1+2+3 Intensity (tCO2e/$M Revenue) 62120 6211 1000 NA
ET Global Index No. of Scope 3 Categories Disclosed 1 NA 15 NA
ET Global Index Relative Scope 1+2 Intensity 9.6949 0.0616 5.0e-05 NA
ET Global Index Relative Scope 3 Intensity 35570.0 NA 0.0 NA
ET Global Index Reported Scope 3 Intensity (tCO2e/$M Revenue) 19399.511 NA 0.0013 NA
ET Global Index Reported Scope 3 Total (tCO2e) 600000000 NA 1011 NA
ET Global Index Revenue ($Million) 0.2 469162.0 10969.2 NA
ET Global Index Scope 1+2 Intensity Accepted or Inferred (tCO2e/$M Revenue) 10582.7 45.2 0.1 NA
ET Global Index Scope 3 Intensity Accepted or Inferred (tCO2e/$M Revenue) 51537 6166 290 NA
FCPA Corporate Investigations On FCPA Corporate Investigations List Yes Yes NA
Global Business Coalition Advocacy & Leadership NA Yes Yes Companies have powerful built-in platforms to advocate for action against HIV/AIDS, TB and malaria. When they join together, their voices are that much more effective at creating real change.
Global G.A.P. Member Producer/Supplier, Retailer and Associate Members of the Global G.A.P. NA Yes Yes Producer/Supplier, Retailer and Associate Members of the Global G.A.P.
Top 100 Military Friendly Employers 2012 Top 100 Military Friendly Employers 2012 by G.I. Jobs Magazine 100 78 1 NA
Top 100 Military Friendly Employers 2013 Top 100 Military Friendly Employers 2013 by G.I. Jobs Magazine 100 67 1 A supplier to an armed service or other agency or department that supports the military. It also includes companies that are commitment to hiring former military.
Top 100 Military Friendly Employers 2014 Top 100 Military Friendly Employers 2014 by G.I. Jobs Magazine Yes Yes A supplier to an armed service or other agency or department that supports the military. It also includes companies that are commitment to hiring former military.
Top 100 Military Friendly Employers 2015 Top 100 Military Friendly Employers 2015 by G.I. Jobs Magazine Yes Yes A supplier to an armed service or other agency or department that supports the military. It also includes companies that are commitment to hiring former military.
Glassdoor Click here to see the 7 items available from this source
Glassdoor ceo:numberOfRatings 1 119 4026 The number of ratings of the CEO
Glassdoor ceo:pctApprove 0 72 100 Percent of ratings of the CEO that were approving
Glassdoor ceo:pctDisapprove 0 28 100 Percent of ratings of the CEO that were disapproving
Glassdoor employer:jobsUrl http://www.glassdoor.com/Job/Walmart-eCommerce-Jobs-E29449.htm?t.p=7785&t.s=j&t.a=c Link to this employer's jobs
Glassdoor employer:numberOfRatings 1 309 6549 The number of Glassdoor users who have rated this company as a place to work.
Glassdoor employer:ratingDescription OK Overall description of employee views
Glassdoor Glassdoor Employer Ratings 1.0 3.5 5.0 The Top Companies for Work-Life Balance list is based on employee feedback shared in company reviews on Glassdoor.
Goodness 500 2009 Click here to see the 2 items available from this source
Goodness 500 2009 Cash donated $0 $0 $400000000 NA
Goodness 500 2009 Executive Diversity 3.0% 13.0% 39.0% NA
Goodness 500 2012 Click here to see the 5 items available from this source
Goodness 500 2012 Cash donated $0 NA $369570300 In US$.
Goodness 500 2012 Executive Diversity 0.0% 6.0% 41.0% Percentage of officers and directors that are female.
Goodness 500 2012 Percentage of Profit 0.0% 0.0% 1.086% Percentage of profit donated.
Goodness 500 2012 Rank 500 155 1 NA
Goodness 500 2012 Toxicity produced 773771631 96065 0 In pounds.
Greenpeace Seafood Sustainability Scorecard 2010 Greenpeace Seafood Sustainability Scorecard 1 4 6 NA
Greenpeace Seafood Sustainability Scorecard 2013 Greenpeace Seafood Sustainability Scorecard 0.1 5.4 7.3 NA
Global Reporting Initiative 2011 Click here to see the 5 items available from this source
Global Reporting Initiative 2011 Application Level Undeclared NA A+ G3 Application Levels indicate to which extent the GRI Guidelines have been utilized in the reporting and which set and number of disclosures have been addressed in the reporting. There are three Application Levels A, B and C.
Global Reporting Initiative 2011 Declared as NA NA Third-party-checked NA
Global Reporting Initiative 2011 Report Link NA NA NA NA
Global Reporting Initiative 2011 Report reference IFC Performance Standards? No NA Yes NA
Global Reporting Initiative 2011 Sector Retailers Industry sector.
Global Reporting Initiative 2012 Click here to see the 10 items available from this source
Global Reporting Initiative 2012 Application Level Undeclared B A+ G3 Application Levels indicate to which extent the GRI Guidelines have been utilized in the reporting and which set and number of disclosures have been addressed in the reporting. There are three Application Levels A, B and C.
Global Reporting Initiative 2012 Country (HQ) NA United States of America NA NA
Global Reporting Initiative 2012 IFC No No Yes Indicates whether company's report include references to the International Finance Corporation's (IFC) Sustainability Performance Standards
Global Reporting Initiative 2012 ISO NA No NA NA
Global Reporting Initiative 2012 OECD NA No NA NA
Global Reporting Initiative 2012 Report Html Address NA NA NA NA
Global Reporting Initiative 2012 Report Pdf Address NA http://www.walmartstores.com/sites/responsibility-report/2012/pdf/WMT_2012_GRR.pdf NA NA
Global Reporting Initiative 2012 Report reference IFC Performance Standards? NA No NA NA
Global Reporting Initiative 2012 Report reference ISO Standards? No No Yes NA
Global Reporting Initiative 2012 Sector NA Retailers NA NA
Global Reporting Initiative 2014 Click here to see the 12 items available from this source
Global Reporting Initiative 2014 Application Level Undeclared B A+ G3 Application Levels indicate to which extent the GRI Guidelines have been utilized in the reporting and which set and number o