CSRHub is the world’s largest CSR (corporate social responsibility) and sustainability ratings and information database.

Since 1887, when it began producing reed organs, the Yamaha Corporation in Japan (then Nippon Gakki Co., Ltd.) has grown to become the world's largest manufacturer of a full line of musical instruments, and a leading producer of audio/visual products, semiconductors and other computer related products, sporting goods, home appliances and furniture, specialty metals, machine tools, and industrial robots. Yamaha now owns 44 subsidiaries and representative offices in overseas markets in addition to numerous related companies in Japan.

Ticker: 7951-TO ISIN: JP3942600002
Address: 10-1, Nakazawa-cho, Naka-ku , Japan , Hamamatsu Shizuoka , , 430-8650 Website: Yamaha Corporation
Phone #: (53) 460-2850 CSR Web Area: SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Basic Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Ratings

  Overall Community Employees Environment Governance
Yamaha Corporation 60 63 63 63 49
Leisure Equipment Manufacturing
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
All company average 55 55 56 58 52
Japan
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Percentile Rankings

Rankings are in percentile terms, compared to other companies in the same industry and country Overall Community Employees Environment Governance
Yamaha Corporation 75% 82% 73% 67% 35%
Leisure Equipment Manufacturing
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Japan
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Special Issues:

Ratings History

Only subscribers can interact with the graph.

More CSR Rating Details

  Community Employees
Community Dev & Philanthropy Product Human Rights & Supply Chain Compensation & Benefits Diversity & Labor Rights Training, Health & Safety
Yamaha Corporation
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Leisure Equipment Manufacturing
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
All company average 53 54 55 58 55 55
Japan
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Environment Governance
Energy & Climate Change Environmant Policy & Reporting Resource Management Board Leadership Ethics Transparency & Reporting
Yamaha Corporation
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Leisure Equipment Manufacturing
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
All company average 57 58 57 50 55 51
Japan
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Percentile rankings

Rankings are in percentile terms, compared to other companies in the same industry and country Community Employees
Community Dev & Philantrophy Product Human Rights & Supply Chain Compensation & Benefits Diversity & Labor Rights Training, Health & Safety
Yamaha Corporation 81% 81% 75% 41% 89% 79%
Leisure Equipment Manufacturing
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Japan
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Environment Governance
Energy & Climate Change Environment Policy & Reporting Resource Management Board Leadership Ethics Transparency & Reporting
Yamaha Corporation 68% 77% 48% 26% 58% 39%
Leisure Equipment Manufacturing
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Japan
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

0 Special Issues Affect This Company (see a list of issues here)

# of Sources
Leisure Equipment Manufacturing
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Overall database
Japan
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

CSRHub Has 27 Data Sources (20 Are Currently Active) for This Company

= sources impacting the current ratings
= sources not impacting the current ratings, but included in earlier ratings for this company
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Original Data Values

(unsubscribed users can see the list, subscribers can see the data details for most sources)

Data source name

Data source element name Minimum value Value provided by datasource Maximum value Data description
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
0. Further Information NA NA NA NA
0.1. Introduction - Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. NA ·Musical instruments (Pianos, Digital musical instruments, Wind instruments, String instruments, Percussion instruments, Educational musical instruments, Professional audio equipment, Soundproof rooms, Music schools, English-language schools, Music entert NA NA
5.1e Identified climate change risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments? NA Yes NA NA
5.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA (i)リスク管理活動を行わない場合のりすくによる財務影響ニーズの変化に対応出来ず商機を失し、売上減となる。(ii)リスク管理手法事業活動の中で実施。消費者情報収集、分析、環境配慮製品開発。(iii)リスク管理にかかる費用5.1d-(iii)と同様に環境会計により費用を把握している。当回答の費用もその費用に含まれる。 NA NA
5.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
5.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
5.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
6. Attachments NA NA NA NA
6. Further Information NA NA NA NA
6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Opportunities driven by changes in regulation; Opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA NA
6.1a Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in regulation? NA Yes NA NA
6.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA (i)その機会の財務影響CO2削減に効果のある製品を市場に出すことが出来れば売上増となる可能性がある。(ii)機会の管理手法事業活動の中で管理している。自社の得意分野(=音に関わる分野)の中での環境負荷低減につながる製品の開発。(iii)機会管理に関わる費用環境会計によって把握している。5.1dで回答した数字(JPY105637322)の内数 NA NA
6.1c Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in physical climate parameters? NA No NA NA
14. Attachments NA NA NA NA
6.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA NA NA NA
6.1e Identified opportunities that are driven by changes in other climate-related developments? NA Yes NA NA
6.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA (i)機会の財務影響寄付活動などによる費用の支出が考えられる(ii)機会管理の手法社内委員会などによる検討。社内決裁ルールに基づいた決裁による。(iii)関連するコスト社会貢献費用として社内会計システムで把握している。 NA NA
13. Attachments NA NA NA NA
11. Attachments NA NA NA NA
11. Further Information NA NA NA NA
11.1. Do you consider that the grid average factors used to report Scope 2 emissions in Question 8.3 reflect the contractual arrangements you have with electricity suppliers? NA No NA NA
11.1a. You may report a total contractual Scope 2 figure in response to this question. Please provide your total global contractual Scope 2 GHG emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 0 142162 17902000 NA
11.2. Has your organization retired any certificates, e.g. Renewable Energy Certificates, associated with zero or low carbon electricity within the reporting year or has this been done on your behalf? NA Yes NA NA
3.1e. Please explain (i) why not; and (ii) forecast how your emissions will change over the next five years NA NA NA NA
3.2. Does the use of your goods and/or services directly enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party? No Yes Yes NA
3.2a. Please provide details (see guidance) NA i)・省エネルギー製品(ルーター、電子楽器、AV製品など)の使用による削減 ・遠隔地会議システム使用による出張移動の減少にともなう排出量削減 ii)、iii)データ把握していない iv)検討していない。 NA NA
3.3c Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities. 0 1 12 NA
3.3c. What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities? NA Internal finance mechanisms NA NA
5. Attachments NA NA NA NA
5. Further Information NA NA NA NA
5.1. Have you identified any climate change risks (current or future) that have potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Risks driven by changes in regulation; Risks driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA NA
5.1a Identified risks driven by changes in regulation? NA NA NA NA
5.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA (i) リスク管理活動を行わない場合のリスクによる財務影響 リスクそのものを定量的にとらえることが出来ない。財務影響も把握できない。(ii)リスク管理手法「ヤマハグループ環境委員会」での活動を通して実施している。(iii)リスク管理にかかる費用国内グループ会社+インドネシアグループ会社については環境会計により費用を把握している。2010年度は JPY498791905 NA NA
14. Further Information NA NA NA NA
1.1. Where is the highest level of direct responsibility for climate change within your company? No individual or committee with overall responsibility for climate change Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board NA
1.1a. Please identify the position of the individual or name of the committee with this responsibility NA Yamaha Group Environment Committee Committe Chairman : Seiji Abe, Executive Officer in charge of environment management NA NA
1.2. Do you provide incentives for the management of climate change issues, including the attainment of targets? No No Yes NA
13. Further Information NA NA NA NA
13.1. How do your absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year compare to the previous year? Increased Increased Decreased NA
13.1a (i) If absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) have increased, decreased or remained the same overall compared to the previous year, state direction of change NA Significant Increase NA NA
13.1a (ii) If absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) have increased, decreased or remained the same overall compared to the previous year, state the reason for the direction of change NA Increase: Emissions reduction activities, Decrease: Change in boundary NA NA
13.1a (iii) If emissions have increased, decreased or remained the same overall, provide the emissions value (%) NA Decrease: 5, Increase: , Emission value for which direction is not stated: NA NA
2012 Score 0 69 100 NA
2012 Performance Band E C A NA
2.3a. Please explain (i) the engagement process and (ii) actions you are advocating NA NA NA NA
8.8. Are carbon dioxide emissions from the combustion of biologically sequestered carbon (i.e. carbon dioxide emissions from burning biomass/biofuels) relevant to your company? No No Yes NA
8.8a. Please provide the emissions in metric tonnes CO2e 0.01 NA 27263000 NA
Management 4. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/83/20883/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/4.Communication/csr_repo2011-e.pdf NA NA
Management 4. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? NA 1 NA NA
5.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA (i)リスク管理活動を行わない場合のリスクによる財務影響材料入手が停止し製品の生産が減少、あるいは停止することにより事業の存続が困難になる。(ii)リスク管理手法通常の事業活動の中で実施。情報収集、分析、製品開発に際して、代替材の検討・開発、環境配慮製品の開発など。(iii)リスク管理にかかる費用国内グループ会社+インドネシアグループ会社については環境会計により費用を把握している。2010年度は JPY105637322 NA NA
2. Attachments NA NA NA NA
2. Further Information NA NA NA NA
5.1c Identified climate change risks driven by change in physical climate parameters? NA Yes NA NA
2.1. Please select the option that best describes your risk management procedures with regard to climate change risks and opportunities NA Integrated into multi-disciplinary company wide risk management processes NA NA
2.1a. Please provide further details (see guidance) NA ・ヤマハグループ環境委員会でグループ全体の環境目的・目標を設定し、事業活動を通じた環境への取り組みを実施する。 ・同委員会の下にワーキンググループを設置し次のテーマの具体的な取り組みを推進する。省エネルギー、廃棄物、化学物質、製品環境、環境貢献活動 ・委員会は四半期に1回(年に4回)開催され、ここで審議・決定された内容は、サイトや部門に伝達され、グループ全体で共有される仕組みになっている。 NA NA
2.2. Is climate change integrated into your business strategy? No Yes Yes NA
2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes (see guidance) NA i.事業戦略への影響:商品開発戦略に大いに影響を与える。気候変動問題、業界動向、市場ニーズなどを総合的に判断し事業戦略となる。基本的には中期経営計画(3ヵ年)に反映される。 ii.気候変動により原材料の調達が困難になること。法規制などにより環境負荷の少ない製品製造が求められること。 iii.短期的に影響を受ける要素:気候変動が引き起こした自然災害により一部地域からの資材調達や販売が困難になった場合。調達先の変更など。 iV.長期的な影響を受ける要素:製品の主要材料が入手困難になること。代替素材の検討、採用 NA NA
2.2b. Please explain why not NA NA NA NA
2.3. Do you engage with policy makers to encourage further action on mitigation and/or adaptation? No No Yes NA
3. Attachments NA NA NA NA
3. Further Information NA NA NA NA
3.1. Did you have an emissions reduction target that was active (ongoing or reached completion) in the reporting year? No Absolute target Absolute and intensity targets NA
14.1. Do you participate in any emission trading schemes? No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next two years No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next two years Yes NA
14.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? No No Yes NA
6.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
6.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA 事業領域に照らして該当しないと考えられる。 NA NA
6.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
7. Attachments NA NA NA NA
7. Further Information NA NA NA NA
7.1. Please provide your base year and base year emissions (Scopes 1 and 2) NA NA NA NA
0.4. Currency selection Please select the currency in which you would like to submit your response. All financial information contained in the response should be in this currency. NA JPY(¥) NA NA
1. Attachments NA NA NA NA
1. Further Information NA NA NA NA
8.7. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 2 emissions More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% NA More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% NA
11.1b. Explain the basis of the alternative figure (see guidance) 日本国内については環境省発表の平成21年度の電気事業者ごとの実排出係数を使用して再計算した。  北海道電力:0.000433、東北電力:0.000468、東京電力:0.000384、中部電力:0.000474、関西電力:0.000294、九州電力:0.000369 海外については把握していないので、Q8.3のままの数字。   NA
14.1b. What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? NA NA
8.1. Please select the boundary you are using for your Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas inventory NA NA NA NA
8.2a. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 92 NA 231902967 NA
8.3a. Please provide your gross global Scope 2 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 293 NA 8071070 NA
8.4. Are there are any sources (e.g. facilities, specific GHGs, activities, geographies, etc.) of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions which are not included in your disclosure? NA Yes NA NA
8.6. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 1 emissions More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% NA More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
8.7. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 2 emissions No third party verification or assurance Proportion of Scope 2 emissions that are verified/assured for 2011-2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.7a. Please indicate the proportion of your Scope 2 emissions that are verified/assured More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% NA More than 90% but less than or equal to 100%
8.7b Reporting Period From/To/Please provide further details of the verification/assurance undertaken, and attach the relevant statements/Type of verification or assurance/Relevant standard/Attach the document No Response
8.8. Are carbon dioxide emissions from biologically sequestered carbon relevant to your organization? No
8.8a. Please provide the emissions in metric tonnes CO2 NA
8.8a. Please provide the emissions in metric tonnes CO2e 0.05 NA 13638000
9.1. Do you have Scope 1 emissions sources in more than one country? Yes
9.1a Reporting Period From/To/Please complete the table below: Country/Region/Scope 1 metric tonnes CO2e 1 Apr 2011/31 Mar 2012/Japan/33650
9.2. Please indicate which other Scope 1 emissions breakdowns you are able to provide (tick all that apply) NA By facility; By GHG type; By activity NA
9.2a Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by business division: Business division/Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) No Response
9.2b Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by facility: Facility/Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) 1 Apr 2011/31 Mar 2012/ヤマハ㈱ 本社事業所/421
9.2c Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by GHG type: GHG type/Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) 1 Apr 2011/31 Mar 2012/CO2/30015
9.2d Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by activity: Activity/Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) 1 Apr 2011/31 Mar 2012/Production/31591
9.2e Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by legal structure: Legal structure/Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) No Response
0.3. Country list configuration United Kingdom
0.4. Currency selection Please select the currency in which you would like to submit your response. All financial information contained in the response should be in this currency. JPY(¥)
0.4. Please select the currency in which you would like to submit your response. JPY(¥)
0.5. Please select if you wish to complete a shorter information request. NA
0.6. Modules NA As part of the Investor CDP information request, electric utilities, companies with electric utility activities or assets, companies in the automobile or auto component manufacture sectors and companies in the oil and gas industry should complete suppleme
1. Attachments NA NA NA
1. Further Information NA NA NA
1.1. Where is the highest level of direct responsibility for climate change within your company? No individual or committee with overall responsibility for climate change Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board
1.1a. Please identify the position of the individual or name of the committee with this responsibility NA Yamaha Group Environment Committee Chairman : Seiji Abe, Executive Officer in charge of environment management NA
1.2. Do you provide incentives for the management of climate change issues, including the attainment of targets? No Yes Yes
1.2a. Who is entitled to benefit from these incentives? All employees/Monetary reward/Yamaha Productivity Management (YPM) activities started in FY2006 as a company-wide initiative to promote improvement through sustainability in the workplace. Groups that achieve the best results from their efforts receive an
10.1. Do you have Scope 2 emissions sources in more than one country? Yes
10.1a Reporting Period: From/To/Please complete the table below: Country/Region/Scope 2 metric tonnes CO2e/Purchased and consumed electricity, heat, steam or cooling (MWh)/Purchased and consumed low carbon electricity, heat, steam or cooling (MWh) 1 Apr 2011/31 Mar 2012/Japan/46369/127598.77/
10.2. Please indicate which other Scope 2 emissions breakdowns you are able to provide (tick all that apply) NA By facility; By activity NA
10.2a Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by business division: Business division/Scope 2 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) No Response
10.2b Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by facility: Facility/Scope 2 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) 1 Apr 2011/31 Mar 2012/ヤマハ㈱ 本社事業所/4048
10.2c Reporting Period: From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by activity: Activity/Scope 2 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) 1 Apr 2011/31 Mar 2012/Production/136392
10.2d Reporting Period: From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by legal structure: Legal structure/Scope 2 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) No Response
11. Attachments NA NA NA
11. Further Information NA NA NA
11.1. What percentage of your total operational spend in the reporting year was on energy? More than 0% but less than or equal to 5% More than 0% but less than or equal to 5% More than 95% but less than or equal to 100%
11.2. Please state how much fuel, electricity, heat, steam, and cooling in MWh your organization has purchased and consumed during the reporting year: Energy type/MWh Fuel/139743;Electricity/232103;Heat/;Steam/27678;Cooling/
11.3. Please complete the table by breaking down the total "Fuel" figure entered above by fuel type: Fuels/MWh Kerosene/252
11.4. Please provide details of the electricity, heat, steam or cooling amounts that were accounted at a low carbon emission factor: Basis for applying a low carbon emission factor/MWh associated with low carbon electricity, heat, steam or cooling No response
12. Attachments NA
12. Further Information NA
12.1. How do your absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year compare to the previous year? Increased
12.1a Reason of change Emissions reduction activities, Divestment, Acquisitions, Mergers, Change in output, Change in methodology, Change in boundary, Change in physical operating conditions, Unidentified, Other
12.1a. Reason: Emissions value (percentage) Emissions reduction activities: 2/Change in output: 5.3/Other: 0.3
12.2. Please describe your gross combined Scope 1 and 2 emissions for the reporting year in metric tonnes CO2e per revenue: Intensity figure/Metric numerator/% change from previous year/Direction of change from previous year/Reason for change 50.03/metric tonnes CO2e/8/Increase/連結売上高(億円)あたりのCO2。 東日本大震災、タイの洪水の影響で一部商品の部品調達に遅れがあり、生産、販売に影響が出た。その他円高による為替影響で、前年に比べ4.6%の売上減となった。CO2排出は全体として2.9%増加したため、原単位数値は悪化した。
12.3. Please describe your gross combined Scope 1 and 2 emissions for the reporting year in metric tonnes CO2e per FTE: Intensity figure/Metric numerator/% change from previous year/Direction of change from previous year/Reason for change 8.2/metric tonnes CO2e/7/Decrease/海外、特にインドネシアにおいて人員増があり、原単位数量は減少した。
12.4. Please provide an additional intensity (normalized) metric that is appropriate to your business operations: Intensity figure/Metric numerator/% change from previous year/Direction of change from previous year/Reason for change No response
13.1. Do you participate in any emissions trading schemes? No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next 2 years
13.1b. What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? NA
13.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? No
14. Attachments NA NA NA
14. Further Information NA NA NA
14.1. Do you participate in any emission trading schemes? No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next two years No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next 2 years Yes
14.1b. What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? NA
14.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? No No Yes
14.2. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 3 emissions No third party verification or assurance
14.2a. Please indicate the proportion of your Scope 3 emissions that are verified/assured NA
14.3. Are you able to compare your Scope 3 emissions for the reporting year with those for the previous year for any sources? Yes
14.4. Do you engage with any of the elements of your value chain on GHG emissions and climate change strategies? (Tick all that apply) No, we do not engage
14.4a. Please give details of methods of engagement, your strategy for prioritizing engagements and measures of success NA
14.4d. Please explain why not and any plans you have to develop an engagement strategy in the future 社内において、その重要性と必要性が議論されていない。
2. Attachments NA NA NA
2. Further Information NA NA NA
2.1. Please select the option that best describes your risk management procedures with regard to climate change risks and opportunities NA A specific climate change risk management process NA
2.1a. Please provide further details i) 気候変動に関するリスクについては、ヤマハグループ環境委員会で管理されている。現在のところ国内のISO14001でカバーされる範囲(サイト、部門)が主体となっている。その中で環境負荷の監視を実施しているが、内容はエネルギー使用とCO2排出、その他温室効果ガスの排出、産業廃棄物の排出、化学物質の排出(PRTR,VOC)である。 ii)法規制や行政から示された値が第一の基準になるが、それを元にグループとしての目標を設定している。例えばグループのCO2削減目標など。 iii)グループの目標から各サイ
2.1a. Please provide further details (see guidance) NA i) 気候変動に関するリスクについては、ヤマハグループ環境委員会で管理されている。現在のところ国内のISO14001でカバーされる範囲(サイト、部門)が主体となっている。その中で環境負荷の監視を実施しているが、内容はエネルギー使用とCO2排出、その他温室効果ガスの排出、産業廃棄物の排出、化学物質の排出(PRTR,VOC)である。 ii)法規制や行政から示された値が第一の基準になるが、それを元にグループとしての目標を設定している。例えばグループのCO2削減目標など。 iii)グループの目標から各サイ NA
2.2. Is climate change integrated into your business strategy? No Yes Yes
2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes i.事業戦略への影響:商品開発戦略に大いに影響を与える。気候変動問題、業界動向、市場ニーズなどを総合的に判断し事業戦略となる。基本的には中期経営計画(3ヵ年)に反映される。 ii.気候変動により原材料の調達が困難になること。法規制などにより環境負荷の少ない製品製造が求められること。 iii.短期的に影響を受ける要素:気候変動が引き起こした自然災害により一部地域からの資材調達や販売が困難になった場合。調達先の変更など。 iV.長期的な影響を受ける要素:製品の主要材料が入手困難になること。代替素材の検討、採用
2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes (see guidance) NA i.事業戦略への影響:商品開発戦略に大いに影響を与える。気候変動問題、業界動向、市場ニーズなどを総合的に判断し事業戦略となる。基本的には中期経営計画(3ヵ年)に反映される。 ii.気候変動により原材料の調達が困難になること。法規制などにより環境負荷の少ない製品製造が求められること。 iii.短期的に影響を受ける要素:気候変動が引き起こした自然災害により一部地域からの資材調達や販売が困難になった場合。調達先の変更など。 iV.長期的な影響を受ける要素:製品の主要材料が入手困難になること。代替素材の検討、採用 NA
2.2b. Please explain why not NA NA NA
2.3. Do you engage in activities that could either directly or indirectly influence policy on climate change through any of the following? (tick all that apply) Yes
2.3. Do you engage with policy makers to encourage further action on mitigation and/or adaptation? No Yes Yes
2.3a. On what issues have you been engaging directly?: Focus of legislation/Corporate Position/Details of engagement/Proposed solution NA
2.3a. Please explain (i) the engagement process and (ii) actions you are advocating NA NA NA
2.3b. Are you on the Board of any trade associations or provide funding beyond membership? Yes
2.3c. Please enter the details of those trade associations that are likely to take a position on climate change legislation/Trade association 1.全国楽器協会/Consistent/楽器業界として環境負荷の削減に努める。 例として、VOCの削減に対して業界としての自主基準を設けて取り組んでいる。/弊社の社長が協会の会長をつとめる。 弊社の重役が協会の顧客環境委員長をつとめる。
2.3d. Do you publically disclose a list of all the research organizations that you fund? NA
2.3e. Do you fund any research organizations to produce public work on climate change? NA
2.3f. Please describe the work and how it aligns with your own strategy on climate change NA
2.3g. Please provide details of the other engagement activities that you undertake NA
2.3h. What processes do you have in place to ensure that all of your direct and indirect activities that influence policy are consistent with your overall climate change strategy? 1.全国楽器協会で実施される環境委員会の中で、会員各社の環境に関する取り組みの状況や、協会の設定した目標の達成状況の報告がなされる。その過程において自社の戦略と矛盾していないことが確認できる。もし矛盾する場合は協議をしてするあわせることが必要となる。 2,3. ヤマハの楽器の材料として木材を多く消費することから、森林環境保護は重要な環境課題のひとつと考えている。グループのCSR方針にも適正な木材活用と森林保護活動の推進がテーマとして掲げられている。 4. 静岡県としての温室効果ガス削減目標の達成のため、県
2.3i. Please explain why you do not engage with policy makers NA
3. Attachments NA NA NA
3. Further Information NA NA NA
3.1. Did you have an emissions reduction target that was active (ongoing or reached completion) in the reporting year? No Absolute target Absolute and intensity targets
3.1a. Absolute target/ID/Scope/% of emissions in scope/% reduction from base year/Base year/Base year emissions (metric tonnes CO2e)/Target year/Comment 1/Scope 1+2/100/3.6/2010/63730/2011/目標は国内の生産関連のみについて設定しており、国内の生産関連以外、および海外は含まれておりません。
3.1b. Intensity target/ID/Scope/% of emissions in scope/% reduction from base year/Metric/Base year/Normalized base year emissions/Target year/Comment No Response
3.1c. What change in absolute emissions this intensity target reflects/ID/Direction of change anticipated in absolute Scope 1+2 emissions at target completion?/% change anticipated in absolute Scope 1+2 emissions No Response
3.1d. Please provide details on your progress against this target made in the reporting year/ID/% complete (time)/% complete (emissions)/Comment /33/1.6/当該年度の目標1.2%の削減に対して1.6%の削減を達成した。
3.1e. Please explain (i) why not; and (ii) forecast how your emissions will change over the next five years NA NA NA
3.2. Does the use of your goods and/or services directly enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party? No Yes Yes
3.2a. Please provide details (see guidance) NA i)・省エネルギー製品(ルーター、電子楽器、AV製品など)の使用による削減 ・遠隔地会議システム使用による出張移動の減少にともなう排出量削減 ii)、iii)データ把握していない iv)検討していない。 NA
3.3. Did you have emissions reduction initiatives that were active within the reporting year (this can include those in the planning and/or implementation phases) No Yes Yes
3.3a. Please identify the total number of projects at each stage of development, and for those in theimplementation stages, the estimated CO2e savings/Stage of development/3.3a. Number of projects/Total estimated annual CO2e savings in metric tonnes CO2e Under investigation//
3.3c Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities. 0 1 13 Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities.
3.3c. What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities? NA Internal finance mechanisms NA
3.3c. What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities?/Comment Internal finance mechanisms/中期経営計画に基づき投資の計画も決定される。投資計画にはその時々の戦略によって様々な側面から検討されるが、排出削減に関しては「ヤマハグループ環境委員会」のレビューがその要素の一つになる。
4. Attachments NA
4. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? - Further Information NA
4.1. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? 1 The number of corporate annual reports and voluntary publications (complete and/or underway) made about the company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance
5. Attachments NA NA NA
5. Further Information NA NA NA
5.1. Have you identified any climate change risks (current or future) that have potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Risks driven by changes in regulation; Risks driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA
5.1a. Climate change risks driven by changes in regulation Yes
5.1a. Please describe your risks driven by changes in regulation /ID/Risk driver/ Description/Potential impact/Timeframe/Direct/Indirect/Likelihood/Magnitude of impact 1/International agreements/CO2削減に関する法規制強化。国際的な合意に基づいた国内法規制によりCO2排出規制が強化された場合。/Increased operational cost/1-5 years/Direct/More likely than not/Medium
5.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk and (iii) the costs associated with these actions 1. International agreement(i) リスク管理活動を行わない場合のリスクによる財務影響 排出量削減計画を全く実施しない場合、削減出来ない部分を、例えば排出権購入で対応する事が考えられるが、その金額はtあたり¥4000と仮定して年間250万円程度し。しかしながら、排出量を削減することは、継続的な生産性向上、コストダウン大きく関連しており、リスク管理活動を行わない場合は、競争力低下を招き売り上げ減につながる可能性が高い。(ii)リスク管理手法 ヤマハグループ環境委員会での活動を通し
5.1c. Climate change risks driven by change in physical climate parameters Yes
5.1c. Please describe your risks that are driven by change in physical climate parameters/ID/Risk driver/Description/Potential impact/Timeframe/Direct/Indirect/Likelihood/Magnitude of impact 1/Change in mean (average) temperature/夏の高温化、冬の低温化が近年の傾向であるが、それにより冷暖房の使用が従来に比べて多くなる/Increased operational cost/1-5 years/Direct/Virtually certain/Medium
5.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA 1.Change in mean (average) temperature(i)リスク管理活動を行わない場合のリスクによる財務影響 冷暖房の使用が増加し、光熱費が増加する。1%増加すると仮定して年間2200万円の損失となる。(ii)リスク管理手法 ヤマハグループ環境委員会での活動の中で年間を通して省エネ活動を実施している。設備については更新の都度より高効率な機器に変えている。(iii)リスク管理にかかる費用 環境保全活動を評価するため環境会計の手法を導入している。環境目的金額のうち、設備投資については約 NA
5.1e. Please describe your risks that are driven by changes in other climate-related developments/ID/Risk driver/Description/Potential impact/Timeframe/Direct/Indirect/Likelihood/Magnitude of impact cp1/Change in temperature extremes/The company would be affected because it has a global supply chain./Increased operational cost/Unknown/Indirect (Supply chain)/Unknown/Unknown
5.1e.Climate change risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments Yes
5.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA (i)リスク管理活動を行わない場合のリスクによる財務影響ニーズの変化に対応出来ず商機を失し、売上減となる。AV/IT、電子楽器、 PA商品の売り上げが10%減と仮定して年間約140億円の損失となる。(ii)リスク管理手法事業活動の中で実施。消費者情報収集、分析、環境配慮製品開発。各部門の品質マネジメントの目標としてエコフレンドリー商品の開発をテーマにしている。(iii)リスク管理にかかる費用環境会計の中の環境関連費用中、環境配慮製品、仕様開発など研究開発コストは約10%で、年間約1億4千万円。 NA
5.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
5.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
5.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
6. Attachments NA NA NA
6. Further Information NA NA NA
6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Opportunities driven by changes in regulation; Opportunities driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA
6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? -Transparency Yes
6.1a Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in regulation? NA Yes NA
6.1a. Please describe your opportunities that are driven by changes in regulation/ID/Opportunity driver/Description/Potential impact/Timeframe/Direct/Indirect/Likelihood/Magnitude of impact /International agreements/CO2排出量規制の強化/New products/business services/1-5 years/Direct/More likely than not/Medium
6.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity and (iii) the costs associated with these actions (i)その機会の財務影響CO2削減に効果のある製品を市場に出すことが出来れば売上増となる可能性がある。他社よりも高効率な製品を市場投入出来れば、シェアーを拡大する事が出来る。(ii)機会の管理手法事業活動の中で管理している。自社の得意分野(=音に関わる分野)の中での環境負荷低減につながる製品の開発。(iii)機会管理に関わる費用(5.1fと同じ)環境会計の中の環境関連費用中、環境配慮製品、仕様開発など研究開発コストは約10%で、年間約1億4千万円。
6.1c. Please describe the opportunities that are driven by changes in physical climate parameters Yes
6.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity and (iii) the costs associated with these actions (i)機会の財務影響 売り上げ増加。(ii)機会管理の手法適切でタイムリーな復興支援活動と営業活動の展開。(iii)関連するコスト社会貢献活動として、金品の寄付を伴う復興支援も同時に行なう可能性もある。
6.1e. Please describe the opportunities that are driven by changes in other climate-related developments Yes
6.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA 1. Changing consumer behaviour(i)機会の財務影響ニーズの変化に素早く対応出来れば商機得て、売上増となる。AV/IT, DMI, PA商品の売り上げが10%増と仮定して140億円の売上増加となる。(ii)機会管理手法事業活動の中で実施。消費者情報収集、分析、環境配慮製品開発。各部門の品質マネジメントの目標としてエコフレンドリー商品の開発をテーマにしている。(iii)リスク管理にかかる費用環境会計の中の環境関連費用中、環境配慮製品、仕様開発など研究開発コストは約10%で、約1億 NA
6.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
6.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
6.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
7. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/sites/2013/83/20883/Investor CDP 2013/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2013/7.EmissionsMethodology/排出係数典拠.xls NA
7. Further Information NA NA NA
7.1. Please provide your base year and base year emissions (Scopes 1 and 2)/7.1. Base year From Date:/To Date:/ Scope 1 Base year emissions (metric tonnes CO2e)/N39Scope 2 Base year emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) 1990-04-01/1991-03-31/36767/71500
7.2. Please give the name of the standard, protocol or methodology you have used to collect activity data and calculate Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions NA Other NA
7.3. Please give the source for the global warming potentials you have used Gas/Reference CO2/Other: 事業者からの温室効果ガス排出量算定方法ガイドライン(試案)
7.4. Please give the emissions factors you have applied and their origin; alternatively, please attach an Excel spreadsheet with this data Fuel/Material/Energy/Emission Factor/Unit/Reference Electricity/0.378/Other: kgCO2 per kWh/日本国内用:事業者からの温室効果ガス排出量算定方法ガイドライン(試案)
8.1. Please select the boundary you are using for your Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas inventory NA Financial control NA Boundary used for Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas inventory during 2011-2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.2. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e NA Gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e for 2011 - 2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.2. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figures in metric tonnes CO2e 36911
8.3. Please provide your gross global Scope 2 emissions figures in metric tonnes CO2e NA
8.4. Are there are any sources (e.g. facilities, specific GHGs, activities, geographies, etc.) of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions which are not included in your disclosure? NA No NA Proportion of Scope 1 emissions that are verified/assured for 2011 - 2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.4a Reporting Period From/To/Source/Scope/Explain why the source is excluded No Response
8.5 Reporting Period From/To/Please estimate the uncertainty of the total gross global Scope 1 and 2 emissions figures that you have supplied and specify the sources of uncertainty in your data gathering, handling and calculations/Scope 1 emissions No Response
8.6. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 1 emissions No third party verification or assurance Proportion of Scope 1 emissions that are verified/assured for 2011 - 2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.6a. Please indicate the proportion of your Scope 1 emissions that are verified/assured More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% NA More than 90% but less than or equal to 100%
8.6b Reporting Period From/To/Please provide further details of the verification/assurance undertaken, and attach the relevant statements: Type of verification or assurance/Attach the document No Response
2013 Performance Band E C A NA
2013 Score 0 79 100 NA
0. Attachments NA NA NA If you have not been presented with a sector module that you consider would be appropriate for your company to answer, please select the module below. If you wish to view the questions first, please see https://www.cdproject.net/en-US/Programmes/Pages/Mor
0. Further Information NA NA NA If you are in these sectors (according to the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS)), the corresponding sector modules will be marked as default options to your information request. If you want to query your classification, please email respond@c
0.1. Introduction - Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. NA ·Musical instruments (Pianos, Digital musical instruments, Wind instruments, String instruments, Percussion instruments, Educational musical instruments, Professional audio equipment, Soundproof rooms, Music schools, English-language schools, Music entert NA
0.1. Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. ·Musical instruments (Pianos, Digital musical instruments, Wind instruments, String instruments, Percussion instruments, Educational musical instruments, Professional audio equipment, Soundproof rooms, Music schools, English-language schools, Music entert
0.2. Please state the start and end date of the year for which you are reporting data. 2012-07-31
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Description NA Description of the company's product.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
ceo:numberOfRatings 1 1 4026 The number of ratings of the CEO
ceo:pctApprove 0 100 100 Percent of ratings of the CEO that were approving
ceo:title NA The title of the company's CEO
employer:numberOfRatings 1 5 6549 The number of Glassdoor users who have rated this company as a place to work.
Glassdoor Employer Ratings 1 3.2 5 The Top Companies for Work-Life Balance list is based on employee feedback shared in company reviews on Glassdoor.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Report reference ISO Standards? NA No NA NA
Sector NA Metals Products NA NA
Country (HQ) NA Canada NA NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Guidelines NA GRI - Referenced NA This field indicates which version of the GRI Guidelines is used for the reporting. As of publication year 2009, GRI only includes reporting that makes use of the G3 Guidelines, which were released in October 2006.
Integrated No No Yes GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
Publication Year 2013 GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
Region NA Asia NA Region the organization operates in.
Report Html Address NA NA NA URL of the report location.
Report Pdf Address NA http://www.yamaha.com/about_yamaha/csr/common/pdf/csr_repo2013-e.pdf NA Location of a PDF version of the report.
Report Title NA CSR Report 2013 NA Title of the report.
Sector NA Automotive NA Industry sector.
Sector Supplements (Final) NA NA NA This field indicates if the reporting organization has made use of one of the final Sector Supplements and which one. If ‘not used’ is indicated, it means that one of the final Sector Supplements is applicable, but has not been used. If ‘not applicable’ i
Size NA MNE NA GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Corporate Governance 3 0 0 The scores for each ESG scope issue ranges from 0-3. The scoring refers to the number of times the company was criticized in relation to that scope issue: 0 = little or no exposure in the past 4 years; 1 = 5 direct relations in the past 4 years; 2 = 10 direct relations in the past 4 years; 3 = 20 direct relations in the past 4 years.
Current RRI 86 0 0 The RepRisk Index (RRI) is a quantitative risk measure that captures criticism and quantifies a company's exposure to controversial environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues. It does not measure a company's overall reputation, but rather is an indicator of their reputational risk.The Current RRI value indicates the current level of criticism about a company.
Employee Relations 3 0 0 The scores for each ESG scope issue ranges from 0-3. The scoring refers to the number of times the company was criticized in relation to that scope issue: 0 = little or no exposure in the past 4 years; 1 = 5 direct relations in the past 4 years; 2 = 10 direct relations in the past 4 years; 3 = 20 direct relations in the past 4 years.
Environmental FootPrint 3 0 0 The scores for each ESG scope issue ranges from 0-3. The scoring refers to the number of times the company was criticized in relation to that scope issue: 0 = little or no exposure in the past 4 years; 1 = 5 direct relations in the past 4 years; 2 = 10 direct relations in the past 4 years; 3 = 20 direct relations in the past 4 years.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Rank 400 309 1 REPORTWATCH RATING
Report Rating D B A REPORTWATCH RATING
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Value of USG Contracts (in millions) 990 NA 1 Value of Iranian contracts.
Withdrawn NA Was the association with Iran withdrawn?
Nationality Japan Country the company is in.
On the list Yes Yes Is the company on the list.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
include_continued_support_statement 0 1 1 NA
additional_questions 0 0 1 NA
cop_web_link NA http://www.unglobalcompact.org/COPs/detail/19736 NA NA
created_at NA 39778.9979 NA NA
differentiation NA active NA NA
ends_on NA 39507 NA NA
include_measurement 0 1 1 NA
meets_advanced_criteria 0 0 1 NA
method_shared NA all NA NA
references_anti_corruption 0 1 1 NA
references_environment 0 1 1 NA
references_human_rights 0 1 1 NA
references_labour 0 1 1 NA
starts_on NA 39172 NA NA
title NA Communication on Progress NA NA
updated_at NA 39778.9979 NA NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
include_measurement 0 1 1 Does your COP identify targets, define performance indicators and measure outcomes?
references_anti_corruption 0 1 1 Does your COP contain description of actions, and when relevant policies, related to anti-corruption?
references_environment 0 1 1 Does your COP contain description of actions, and when relevant policies, related to the environment?
references_human_rights 0 1 1 Does your COP contain description of actions, and when relevant policies, related to human rights?
references_labour 0 1 1 Does your COP contain description of actions, and when relevant policies, related to labour rights?
starts_on NA 04/01/2012 NA Start Date
differentiation NA active NA At what level is the declarer?
ends_on NA 03/01/2013 NA End Date
format NA sustainability_report NA How is your COP shared with stakeholders?
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Weighted score 1.2 3.2 5.9

Flags

(Other Indicators - things that don’t affect ratings but that help identify or classify companies)

SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
You have put report(s) in your cart
Go to my cart
Ok