CSRHub is the world’s largest CSR (corporate social responsibility) and sustainability ratings and information database.

Repsol YPF is a hydrocarbons exploration, production, refining, marketing, and chemicals company in Argentina. YPF has more than 30,000 employees around the country and is one of the businesses of the Repsol Group. The Group is a global oil and gas company with a presence in more than 30 countries worldwide.

Ticker: REP-MC ISIN: ES0173516115
Address: Paseo de la Castellana 278 , Spain , Madrid , MAD , 28046 Website: Repsol YPF
Phone #: 34-91-3488100 CSR Web Area: SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Basic Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Ratings

  Overall Community Employees Environment Governance
Repsol YPF 65 57 71 68 61
Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber Products Mfg.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Oil and Gas Extraction
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Petroleum Refineries
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
All company average 55 55 56 58 52
Spain
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Percentile Rankings

Rankings are in percentile terms, compared to other companies in the same industry and country Overall Community Employees Environment Governance
Repsol YPF 94% 58% 91% 83% 78%
Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber Products Mfg.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Oil and Gas Extraction
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Petroleum Refineries
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Spain
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Special Issues:

Ratings History

Only subscribers can interact with the graph.

More CSR Rating Details

  Community Employees
Community Dev & Philanthropy Product Human Rights & Supply Chain Compensation & Benefits Diversity & Labor Rights Training, Health & Safety
Repsol YPF
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber Products Mfg.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Oil and Gas Extraction
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Petroleum Refineries
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
All company average 53 54 55 58 55 55
Spain
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Environment Governance
Energy & Climate Change Environmant Policy & Reporting Resource Management Board Leadership Ethics Transparency & Reporting
Repsol YPF
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber Products Mfg.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Oil and Gas Extraction
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Petroleum Refineries
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
All company average 57 58 57 50 55 51
Spain
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Percentile rankings

Rankings are in percentile terms, compared to other companies in the same industry and country Community Employees
Community Dev & Philantrophy Product Human Rights & Supply Chain Compensation & Benefits Diversity & Labor Rights Training, Health & Safety
Repsol YPF 67% 53% 50% 63% 94% 97%
Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber Products Mfg.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Oil and Gas Extraction
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Petroleum Refineries
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Spain
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Environment Governance
Energy & Climate Change Environment Policy & Reporting Resource Management Board Leadership Ethics Transparency & Reporting
Repsol YPF 85% 90% 67% 66% 74% 92%
Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber Products Mfg.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Oil and Gas Extraction
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Petroleum Refineries
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Spain
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

0 Special Issues Affect This Company (see a list of issues here)

# of Sources
Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber Products Mfg.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Oil and Gas Extraction
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Petroleum Refineries
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Overall database
Spain
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

CSRHub Has 53 Data Sources (27 Are Currently Active) for This Company

= sources impacting the current ratings
= sources not impacting the current ratings, but included in earlier ratings for this company
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Original Data Values

(unsubscribed users can see the list, subscribers can see the data details for most sources)

Data source name

Data source element name Minimum value Value provided by datasource Maximum value Data description
Brand Finance 2011-12
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Brand Value / Enterprise Value (%) -48.164682123 0.0604 316.6056 NA
Brand Value 2012 784.8292 NA
BSI 50 63.0573 88.4717 NA
Domicile SPAIN NA
Enterprise Value NA 14104.7483 NA NA
Reviewed ? YES NA
Sector Energy NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Brand Value 2013 11.095 3098.9829 67875.2014 NA
BSI 50 63.8822 89.6275 NA
Domicile SPAIN NA
Sector Energy NA
Reviewed RY NA
Brand Rating 2013 BBB AA AAA+ NA
Enterprise Value 2013 0 40382.8699 435750.9811
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Brand Value 2014 10 1685.1248 87304 A brand strength is assessed by using our Brand Strength Index framework. This benchmarks the strength, risk and future potential of a brand relative to its competitors by assessing input measures, brand equity measures, and output performance across four
BSI 51.3 69 94.2 NA
Domicile SPAIN NA
Sector Energy NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
0. Further Information NA NA NA NA
0.1. Introduction - Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. NA Repsol is a leading company expert in energy. We work towards energy solutions which are responsible towards the planet. Present in over 30 countries, we are a global company which thinks locally. Upstream, Downstream and LNG make up the essential busines NA NA
5.1e Identified climate change risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments? NA Yes NA NA
5.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA (i)OR-1 and OR-2: The economic impact associated with loss of brand value could be considerable in the mid-term to long-term future. This economic impact would result in a reduced stock price and/or a diminished demand for the products produced by Repsol NA NA
5.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
5.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
5.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
6. Attachments NA NA NA NA
6. Further Information NA NA NA NA
6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Opportunities driven by changes in regulation; Opportunities driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA NA
6.1a Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in regulation? NA Yes NA NA
6.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA (i) RO-1: It is Repsol’s opinion that there are direct and measurable financial implications associated with successfully leveraging the CDM in energy efficiency projects. For example, Repsol expects to generate in the years to come close to €2 million CE NA NA
6.1c Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in physical climate parameters? NA Yes NA NA
14. Attachments NA NA NA NA
6.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA (i)PO-1: The economic impact associated with an increased demand for the fuel oil provided by Repsol could be important in the long-term future. It is difficult to evaluate the future sales of this fuel at this point in time. However, while the financial NA NA
6.1e Identified opportunities that are driven by changes in other climate-related developments? NA Yes NA NA
6.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA (i)OO-1: The improvement of overall reputation may lead to an increased attractiveness of Repsol’s products such as automotive and industrial fuels as a result of many factors including changing consumer behaviour due to Repsol’s strong commitment to clim NA NA
13. Attachments NA NA NA NA
11. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/69/15669/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/11.EmissionsScope2Contractual/Certified high efficiency energy of Chemicals Spain Bussines Unit Cogeneration.pdf NA NA
11. Further Information NA NA NA NA
11.1. Do you consider that the grid average factors used to report Scope 2 emissions in Question 8.3 reflect the contractual arrangements you have with electricity suppliers? NA Yes NA NA
11.1a. You may report a total contractual Scope 2 figure in response to this question. Please provide your total global contractual Scope 2 GHG emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 0 NA 17902000 NA
11.2. Has your organization retired any certificates, e.g. Renewable Energy Certificates, associated with zero or low carbon electricity within the reporting year or has this been done on your behalf? NA Yes NA NA
3.1e. Please explain (i) why not; and (ii) forecast how your emissions will change over the next five years NA NA NA NA
3.2. Does the use of your goods and/or services directly enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party? No Yes Yes NA
3.2a. Please provide details (see guidance) NA Emissions avoided in 2011 through the use of Repsol´s products result from: Biofuels i. Biofuels contribute in the reduction of CO2 emissions mainly in three ways: 1) avoid the emissions associated with gasoline and diesel; 2) allow the CO2 content of NA NA
3.3c Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities. 0 6 12 NA
3.3c. What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities? NA Compliance with regulatory requirements/standards, Employee engagement, Internal incentives/recognition programs, Lower return on investment (ROI) specification, Dedicated budget for low carbon product R&D, Marginal abatement cost curve NA NA
5. Attachments NA NA NA NA
5. Further Information NA NA NA NA
5.1. Have you identified any climate change risks (current or future) that have potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Risks driven by changes in regulation; Risks driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA NA
5.1a Identified risks driven by changes in regulation? NA NA NA NA
5.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA (i)RR-1: €8 million per annum on average from 2013 to 2020 resulting from the additional certificates that Repsol would need to purchase RR-2: €40 million per annum on average from 2013 to 2020 resulting from the additional certificates that Repsol would NA NA
14. Further Information NA NA NA NA
1.1. Where is the highest level of direct responsibility for climate change within your company? No individual or committee with overall responsibility for climate change Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board NA
1.1a. Please identify the position of the individual or name of the committee with this responsibility NA Repsol’s Executive Committee has the highest level of direct responsibility for climate change. The Executive Committee approves Company’s Climate Change Strategy. The positions of the members that compose Repsol’s Executive Committee are: - Antonio Bruf NA NA
1.2. Do you provide incentives for the management of climate change issues, including the attainment of targets? No Yes Yes NA
13. Further Information NA Further information to Question 13.4: In the case of the oil and gas industry, it is important to establish a clear distinction between the way the Downstream and Upstream Divisions report their CO2 emissions, considering the diversity of the operation NA NA
13.1. How do your absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year compare to the previous year? Increased Decreased Decreased NA
13.1a (i) If absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) have increased, decreased or remained the same overall compared to the previous year, state direction of change NA Slightly Decreased NA NA
13.1a (ii) If absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) have increased, decreased or remained the same overall compared to the previous year, state the reason for the direction of change NA Decrease: Emissions reduction activities, Increase: Other, Decrease: Change in methodology NA NA
13.1a (iii) If emissions have increased, decreased or remained the same overall, provide the emissions value (%) NA Decrease: , Increase: , Emission value for which direction is not stated: NA NA
2012 Score 0 98 100 NA
2012 Performance Band E A- A NA
2.3a. Please explain (i) the engagement process and (ii) actions you are advocating NA Engagement process: i.a) Method and i.c) Nature of engagement Repsol does engage with policymakers to encourage actions in order to combat and mitigate climate change. What is consistent in Repsol’s engagement is the importance of policy and regulatory NA NA
8.8. Are carbon dioxide emissions from the combustion of biologically sequestered carbon (i.e. carbon dioxide emissions from burning biomass/biofuels) relevant to your company? No Yes Yes NA
8.8a. Please provide the emissions in metric tonnes CO2e 0.01 3383000 27263000 NA
Management 4. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/69/15669/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/4.Communication/Main indicators.JPG.JPG NA NA
Management 4. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? NA 38 NA NA
5.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA (i)PR-1: The incidence of drought affecting water supply to refineries in southern Spain and oil wells in northern Africa would have important financial consequences associated with lost production. Repsol has estimated that the reduction in availability NA NA
2. Attachments NA NA NA NA
2. Further Information NA Further information to Question 2.3a: The main climate change working groups in which Repsol takes part are: - International Petroleum Industry Environmental Conservation Association (IPIECA): we are a member of the Climate Change Working Group and va NA NA
5.1c Identified climate change risks driven by change in physical climate parameters? NA Yes NA NA
2.1. Please select the option that best describes your risk management procedures with regard to climate change risks and opportunities NA Integrated into multi-disciplinary company wide risk management processes NA NA
2.1a. Please provide further details (see guidance) NA The process to identify and manage Risks and Opportunities (R&O) includes i. the scope of the processii. how R&O are assessed at a company leveliii. how R&O are assessed at an asset leveliv. the frequency of monitoringv. criteria for determining material NA NA
2.2. Is climate change integrated into your business strategy? No Yes Yes NA
2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes (see guidance) NA i. Repsol´s Business Strategy is defined in 5-year strategic plans that are reviewed annually. The annual revisions monitor risks and opportunities (R&O) that impact the strategic lines of action. The Environmental Footprint and Carbon Unit Department and NA NA
2.2b. Please explain why not NA NA NA NA
2.3. Do you engage with policy makers to encourage further action on mitigation and/or adaptation? No Yes Yes NA
3. Attachments NA NA NA NA
3. Further Information NA Further information to Question 3.2a: Plastics One of the plastics manufactured by Repsol Chemicals is polyurethane. Rigid polyurethane can be used to manufacture insulation for refrigerators, freezer chambers, refrigerated food storage areas, refrig NA NA
3.1. Did you have an emissions reduction target that was active (ongoing or reached completion) in the reporting year? No Absolute target Absolute and intensity targets NA
14.1. Do you participate in any emission trading schemes? No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next two years Yes Yes NA
14.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? No Yes Yes NA
6.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
6.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
6.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
7. Attachments NA NA NA NA
7. Further Information NA Further Information to Question 7.1: The base year for the Repsol inventory and for all the Unit/installation inventories is 2005, since this was the first year in which a standard monitoring and reporting methodology was establish for GHG emissions in NA NA
7.1. Please provide your base year and base year emissions (Scopes 1 and 2) NA NA NA NA
0.4. Currency selection Please select the currency in which you would like to submit your response. All financial information contained in the response should be in this currency. NA USD($) NA NA
1. Attachments NA NA NA NA
1. Further Information NA NA NA NA
8.7. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 2 emissions More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% NA More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% NA
11.1b. Explain the basis of the alternative figure (see guidance) NA NA
14.1b. What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? Our strategy in the area of carbon markets is focused on the following aspects: 1. Manage the EU ETS positions of Repsol’s installations as a single integrated position to reduce transaction costs and protect against market risk: The Carbon Unit manages NA
8.1. Please select the boundary you are using for your Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas inventory NA NA NA NA
8.2a. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 92 NA 231902967 NA
8.3a. Please provide your gross global Scope 2 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 293 NA 8071070 NA
8.4. Are there are any sources (e.g. facilities, specific GHGs, activities, geographies, etc.) of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions which are not included in your disclosure? NA Yes NA NA
8.6. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 1 emissions More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% NA More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
8.8a. Please provide the emissions in metric tonnes CO2e 0.05 2293000 13638000
0.4. Currency selection Please select the currency in which you would like to submit your response. All financial information contained in the response should be in this currency. USD($)
0.6. Modules NA As part of the Investor CDP information request, electric utilities, companies with electric utility activities or assets, companies in the automobile or auto component manufacture sectors and companies in the oil and gas industry should complete suppleme
1. Attachments NA NA NA
1. Further Information NA (Q 1.2a) Repsol provides monetary rewards for the management of climate change issues both annually and in the medium term. NA
1.1. Where is the highest level of direct responsibility for climate change within your company? No individual or committee with overall responsibility for climate change Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board
1.2. Do you provide incentives for the management of climate change issues, including the attainment of targets? No Yes Yes
11. Attachments NA NA NA
11. Further Information NA (Q 11.1)The company's energy cost is a percentage of less than 5% considering the total costs of the company, including those derived from raw materials. However, its reduction is critical for the company since it is a variable of improving competitivenes NA
11.1. What percentage of your total operational spend in the reporting year was on energy? More than 0% but less than or equal to 5% More than 0% but less than or equal to 5% More than 95% but less than or equal to 100%
12. Attachments NA
12. Further Information In March 2012, the Government of Argentina expropriated Repsol's majority holding in YPF. In order to establish a common basis for comparison over time and make it possible to identify trends in the data, data from both 2011 and 2012 has been adjusted acc
12.1. How do your absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year compare to the previous year? Increased
12.1a Reason of change Emissions reduction activities, Divestment, Acquisitions, Mergers, Change in output, Change in methodology, Change in boundary, Change in physical operating conditions, Unidentified, Other
14. Attachments NA NA NA
14. Further Information NA (13.1.a) By the time we submmit this questionary the allowances allocated were unknown. NA
14.1. Do you participate in any emission trading schemes? No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next two years Yes Yes
14.1b. What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? Our strategy in the area of carbon markets is focused on the following aspects: 1. Manage EU ETS positions of Repsol’s installations as a single integrated position to reduce transaction costs and protect against market risk: The Carbon Unit manages the
14.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? No Yes Yes
2. Attachments NA NA NA
2. Further Information NA (Q 2.3e) In September 2011 was signed a collaboration agreement between Repsol Foundation, the Basque Centre of Climate Change (BC3) and the Basque Country University (UPV / EHU) to establish a stable cooperation frameworkworking to generate dynamic and NA
2.1. Please select the option that best describes your risk management procedures with regard to climate change risks and opportunities NA Integrated into multi-disciplinary company wide risk management processes NA
2.1a. Please provide further details (see guidance) NA - Regulatory R&O: i. New regulatory proposals at local, national and international level.ii. This process is an in-house system of environment and safety risk management complemented by a dedicated process for climate change. New legal developments in NA
2.2. Is climate change integrated into your business strategy? No Yes Yes
2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes (see guidance) NA i. Repsol´s Business Strategy is defined in 5-year strategic plans that are reviewed annually. These revisions take into account climate change risks and opportunities (R&O) that impact the strategic lines of action and affect our competitiveness. Rep NA
2.2b. Please explain why not NA NA NA
2.3. Do you engage in activities that could either directly or indirectly influence policy on climate change through any of the following? (tick all that apply) Yes
2.3a. Please explain (i) the engagement process and (ii) actions you are advocating NA Repsol has responded to the European Commission Consultation on the structural options for strengthening the Emissions Trading System EU reflected in the report "The state of the European carbon market in 2012". Repsol supports EU-ETS as the main instrum NA
2.3b. Are you on the Board of any trade associations or provide funding beyond membership? Yes
2.3d. Do you publically disclose a list of all the research organizations that you fund? No
3. Attachments NA NA NA
3. Further Information NA (Q3.1.a) When we express an emission reduction target as compared with the business as usual scenario, what we take into account is the commitment to achieve reductions of emission beyond any variations arising as a result of the external setting conditi NA
3.1. Did you have an emissions reduction target that was active (ongoing or reached completion) in the reporting year? No Absolute target Absolute and intensity targets
3.1e. Please explain (i) why not; and (ii) forecast how your emissions will change over the next five years NA NA NA
3.2. Does the use of your goods and/or services directly enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party? No Yes Yes
3.2a. Please provide details (see guidance) NA Emissions avoided in 2012 through the use of Repsol´s products result from: Biofuelsi. Biofuels contribute in the reduction of CO2 emissions mainly in three ways: 1) avoid the emissions associated with gasoline and diesel; 2) allow the CO2 content of the NA
3.3c Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities. 0 7 13 Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities.
3.3c. What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities? NA Compliance with regulatory requirements/standards, Internal incentives/recognition programs, Lower return on investment (ROI) specification, Dedicated budget for low carbon product R&D, Other, Employee engagement, Compliance with regulatory requirements/s NA
4. Attachments NA
4. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? - Further Information NA
4.1. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? 19 The number of corporate annual reports and voluntary publications (complete and/or underway) made about the company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance
5. Attachments NA NA NA
5. Further Information NA NA NA
5.1. Have you identified any climate change risks (current or future) that have potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Risks driven by changes in regulation; Risks driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA
5.1a. Climate change risks driven by changes in regulation Yes
5.1c. Climate change risks driven by change in physical climate parameters Yes
5.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA (i) PR-1:The incidence of drought affecting water supply to refineries in southern Spain could have financial consequences associated with lost production. Repsol has estimated that the reduction in availability of water from surface resources and aquifer NA
5.1e.Climate change risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments Yes
5.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA (i) OR-1 and OR-2: The economic impact associated with loss of brand value could be considerable in the mid-term to long-term future and for that reason Repsol is already working to avoid these potential risks. This economic impact would result in a reduc NA
5.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
5.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
5.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
6. Attachments NA NA NA
6. Further Information NA NA NA
6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Opportunities driven by changes in regulation; Opportunities driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA
6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? -Transparency Yes
6.1a Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in regulation? NA Yes NA
6.1c. Please describe the opportunities that are driven by changes in physical climate parameters Yes
6.1e. Please describe the opportunities that are driven by changes in other climate-related developments Yes
6.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA (i) OO-1, OO-2 and OO-3:The improvement of overall reputation may lead to an increased attractiveness of Repsol’s products such as automotive and industrial fuels as a result of many factors including changing consumer behaviour, improving brand image an NA
6.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
6.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
6.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
7. Attachments NA NA NA
7. Further Information NA (Q 7.1) The base year for the Repsol inventory and for all the Unit/installation inventories is 2005, since this was the first year in which a standard monitoring and reporting methodology was established for GHG emissions in accordance with the Commissi NA
8.2. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e NA Gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e for 2011 - 2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.3. Please provide your gross global Scope 2 emissions figures in metric tonnes CO2e NA
8.4. Are there are any sources (e.g. facilities, specific GHGs, activities, geographies, etc.) of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions which are not included in your disclosure? NA Yes NA Proportion of Scope 1 emissions that are verified/assured for 2011 - 2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
2013 Performance Band E B A NA
2013 Score 0 98 100 NA
0. Attachments NA NA NA If you have not been presented with a sector module that you consider would be appropriate for your company to answer, please select the module below. If you wish to view the questions first, please see https://www.cdproject.net/en-US/Programmes/Pages/Mor
0. Further Information NA NA NA If you are in these sectors (according to the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS)), the corresponding sector modules will be marked as default options to your information request. If you want to query your classification, please email respond@c
0.1. Introduction - Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. NA Repsol is an international integrated Oil&Gas Company whose main activity consists of the upstream, downstream and liquefied natural gas (LNG) business. The Company has become firmly established as one of the most important international companies in NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Reported Scope 3 Total (tCO2e) 670000000 146290000 0 Indicated the total reported Scope 3 (all other indirect emissions) of the company in metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent (tCO2e) as defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol. Where no Scope 3 emissions are reported, this is recorded as "No Data"
Scope 1+2 Intensity 11162.43 353.59 0.3 Intensity is calculated by adding together a company's Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions and dividing by its turnover.
Global 800 Carbon Rank 800 123 1 Carbon Ranking of 800 international companies. Ranking is determined by EIO Methodology. See Source Info sheet for comments on it
No. of Scope 3 Categories Reported 1 1 15 This column indicates the number of Scope 3 Categories reported. Once placed into one of the four Disclosure Categories, companies are ranked by the number of Scope 3 categories disclosed.
Reported Scope 1+2 Total (tCO2e) 282000000 28670000 843 The total reported Scope 1 (all direct emissions) and Scope 2 (indirect electricity emissions) of the company in metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent (tCO2e) as defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol
Accepted or Inferred Scope 3 Intensity 8547.13 6319.81 64.51 Unless the company reports all 15 Scope 3 categories as defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Standard, an inferred figure based on the highest reported intensity for that sector, across the Global ET Universe, is shown
Category No Public Data Green Public, Complete, and Verified data Companies are placed into one of four data or 'disclosure' categories: 1) Public, Complete, and Verified data; 2) Public, Complete, and Unverified data; 3) Public, Incomplete, Verified or Unverified data; 4) No Public Data
Combined Scope 1+2+3 Intensity 12161.68 3513.49 34.24 Combined Scope 1+2_3 Intensity is calculated by adding together a company's Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions at 100% (disclosed or inferred) + 50% of Scope 3 emissions (disclosed or inferred).
Market Value ($Million) 1667.87 26167 358143.1 A company's market value, or market capitalism (number of shares times x share price). This value was taken on 23.08.2011
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
ceo:numberOfRatings 1 15 4026 The number of ratings of the CEO
ceo:pctApprove 0 67 100 Percent of ratings of the CEO that were approving
ceo:title NA The title of the company's CEO
employer:numberOfRatings 1 27 6549 The number of Glassdoor users who have rated this company as a place to work.
Glassdoor Employer Ratings 1 3 5 The Top Companies for Work-Life Balance list is based on employee feedback shared in company reviews on Glassdoor.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
CO2 Productivity 607.9556 3018.9095 5209401.5137 NA
Leadership Diversity 0 7.69230769230769E-02 0.5 NA
Rank 100 84 1 NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Envtl. Mgmt. 28.6 60 91.9 Based on an analysis of companies tracked in Sustainalytics’ Global Platform, the Environmental Management Score is an assessment of how a company manages its environmental performance through policies, programs, targets, certifications, and the like. To
Green Score 0 59.2 100 NA
Rank 500 248 1 NA
Disclosure 0 99.9 100 Environmental disclosure was included as a stand-alone score to assess each company’s transparency with regard to its environmental performance. Specifically, this score evaluates the breadth and quality of company environmen
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Carbon Productivity 0.015 0.546 0.963 GHG Productivity defined as Revenue ($US) / Total Greenhouse gas (GHG) Emissions (CO2e).
Energy Productivity 0.007 0.369 0.957 Energy Productivity defined as Revenue ($US) / Total Energy Consumption (GJ).
Newsweek Green Score 0.0 0.578 0.843 This score is derived from the following component scores: an Energy Productivity,Carbon Productivity, Water Productivity, Waste Productivity, Reputation, Pay Link, Sustainability Themed Committee, Audit ; weighted at 45 percent, 45 percent, and 10 percen
Pay Link No Yes Yes A mechanism to link the remuneration of any member of a company's senior executive team with the achievement of environmental performance targets.
Rank 500 74 1
Reputation 0.005 0.133 1 The Reputation score is made up of two components: (1) The RepRisk Index, which is a quantitative measure that captures criticism and quantifies a company exposure to ESG risks. (2) The second component is based on the number of environmental issues that
Sustainability Themed Committee No Yes Yes The existence of a committee at the Board of Directors level whose mandate is related to the sustainability of the company, including but not limited to environmental matters.
Waste Productivity 0.014 0.902 0.97 Waste Productivity is defined as Revenue ($US) / [Total waste generated (metric tonnes) – waste recycled/reused (metric tonnes)].
Water Productivity 0.012 0.529 0.992 Water Productivity is defined as Revenue ($US) / Total water use (m3).
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Corporate Governance 3 1 0 The scores for each ESG scope issue ranges from 0-3. The scoring refers to the number of times the company was criticized in relation to that scope issue: 0 = little or no exposure in the past 4 years; 1 = 5 direct relations in the past 4 years; 2 = 10 direct relations in the past 4 years; 3 = 20 direct relations in the past 4 years.
Current RRI 86 36 0 The RepRisk Index (RRI) is a quantitative risk measure that captures criticism and quantifies a company's exposure to controversial environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues. It does not measure a company's overall reputation, but rather is an indicator of their reputational risk.The Current RRI value indicates the current level of criticism about a company.
Employee Relations 3 0.2 0 The scores for each ESG scope issue ranges from 0-3. The scoring refers to the number of times the company was criticized in relation to that scope issue: 0 = little or no exposure in the past 4 years; 1 = 5 direct relations in the past 4 years; 2 = 10 direct relations in the past 4 years; 3 = 20 direct relations in the past 4 years.
Environmental FootPrint 3 3 0 The scores for each ESG scope issue ranges from 0-3. The scoring refers to the number of times the company was criticized in relation to that scope issue: 0 = little or no exposure in the past 4 years; 1 = 5 direct relations in the past 4 years; 2 = 10 direct relations in the past 4 years; 3 = 20 direct relations in the past 4 years.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Rank 400 391 1 REPORTWATCH RATING
Report Rating D B- A REPORTWATCH RATING
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Value of USG Contracts (in millions) 990 450 1 Value of Iranian contracts.
Withdrawn NA Was the association with Iran withdrawn?
Nationality Spain Country the company is in.
On the list Yes Yes Is the company on the list.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
include_continued_support_statement 0 1 1 NA
additional_questions 0 1 1 NA
cop_web_link NA http://www.unglobalcompact.org/COPs/detail/19576 NA NA
created_at NA 39767.6826 NA NA
differentiation NA advanced NA NA
ends_on NA 39416 NA NA
include_measurement 0 1 1 NA
meets_advanced_criteria 0 1 1 NA
method_shared NA gc_website NA NA
references_anti_corruption 0 1 1 NA
references_environment 0 1 1 NA
references_human_rights 0 1 1 NA
references_labour 0 1 1 NA
starts_on NA 39082 NA NA
title NA 2011 Communication on Progress NA NA
updated_at NA 39767.6826 NA NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
include_measurement 0 1 1 Does your COP identify targets, define performance indicators and measure outcomes?
references_anti_corruption 0 1 1 Does your COP contain description of actions, and when relevant policies, related to anti-corruption?
references_environment 0 1 1 Does your COP contain description of actions, and when relevant policies, related to the environment?
references_human_rights 0 1 1 Does your COP contain description of actions, and when relevant policies, related to human rights?
references_labour 0 1 1 Does your COP contain description of actions, and when relevant policies, related to labour rights?
starts_on NA 01/01/2012 NA Start Date
differentiation NA advanced NA At what level is the declarer?
ends_on NA 12/01/2012 NA End Date
format NA standalone NA How is your COP shared with stakeholders?
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Weighted score 1.2 2.7 5.9

Flags

(Other Indicators - things that don’t affect ratings but that help identify or classify companies)

SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
You have put report(s) in your cart
Go to my cart
Ok