CSRHub is the world’s largest CSR (corporate social responsibility) and sustainability ratings and information database.

MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings, Inc.

Subscribe to see all available data

The Group provides a wide range of non-life and life insurance services through domestic/overseas offices and subsidiaries

Ticker: 8752-TO ISIN: JP3890310000
Address: 1-3-7 Yaesu, Chuo-ku , Japan , Tokyo , TKY , 103-0028 Website: MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings, Inc.
Phone #: 81-3-6202-5270 CSR Web Area: SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Basic Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Ratings

  Overall Community Employees Environment Governance
MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings, Inc. 54 49 55 62 47
Insurance Carriers
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
All company average 55 55 56 58 52
Japan
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Percentile Rankings

Rankings are in percentile terms, compared to other companies in the same industry and country Overall Community Employees Environment Governance
MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings, Inc. 42% 22% 43% 63% 28%
Insurance Carriers
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Japan
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Special Issues:

Ratings History

Only subscribers can interact with the graph.

More CSR Rating Details

  Community Employees
Community Dev & Philanthropy Product Human Rights & Supply Chain Compensation & Benefits Diversity & Labor Rights Training, Health & Safety
MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings, Inc.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Insurance Carriers
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
All company average 53 54 55 58 55 55
Japan
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Environment Governance
Energy & Climate Change Environmant Policy & Reporting Resource Management Board Leadership Ethics Transparency & Reporting
MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings, Inc.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Insurance Carriers
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
All company average 57 58 57 50 55 51
Japan
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Percentile rankings

Rankings are in percentile terms, compared to other companies in the same industry and country Community Employees
Community Dev & Philantrophy Product Human Rights & Supply Chain Compensation & Benefits Diversity & Labor Rights Training, Health & Safety
MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings, Inc. 31% 42% 13% 30% 61% 49%
Insurance Carriers
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Japan
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Environment Governance
Energy & Climate Change Environment Policy & Reporting Resource Management Board Leadership Ethics Transparency & Reporting
MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings, Inc. 64% 75% 51% 22% 47% 43%
Insurance Carriers
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Japan
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

0 Special Issues Affect This Company (see a list of issues here)

# of Sources
Insurance Carriers
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Overall database
Japan
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

CSRHub Has 30 Data Sources (18 Are Currently Active) for This Company

= sources impacting the current ratings
= sources not impacting the current ratings, but included in earlier ratings for this company
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Original Data Values

(unsubscribed users can see the list, subscribers can see the data details for most sources)

Data source name

Data source element name Minimum value Value provided by datasource Maximum value Data description
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
BSI 51.3 63 94.2 NA
Domicile JAPAN NA
Sector Financial NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
0. Further Information NA NA NA NA
0.1. Introduction - Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. NA MS&ADインシュアランス グループ ホールディングス株式会社は、三井住友海上火災保険株式会社、あいおいニッセイ同和損害保険株式会社などのグループ保険会社を有する保険持株会社です。       設立年月日:2008年4月1日(2010年4月1日に社名変更)       本社所在地:東京都中央区八重洲1-3-7 八重洲ファーストフィナンシャルビル       代表者  :代表取締役社長 江頭 敏明(えがしら としあき)       資本金  :1,000億円 NA NA
5.1e Identified climate change risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments? NA Yes NA NA
5.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA (ⅰ)このリスクの管理活動を行わないことにより、顧客や市場から否定的な見方をされる恐れがあり、業績や株価に影響が生じる可能性がある。(ⅱ)前記の規制によるリスク、物理的リスクにおいて記載した管理手法により、温暖化対策に対して取り組む。 NA NA
5.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
5.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
5.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
6. Attachments NA NA NA NA
6. Further Information NA 6.1c 気候変動リスクとそのリスクのヘッジに関するお客さまニーズとの関係は不明です。現実に発生した個別の自然災害がお客さまのニーズ喚起の要因とはなり得ますが、こうした個別の自然災害と気候変動との因果関係の立証は不可能です。 NA NA
6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Opportunities driven by changes in regulation; Opportunities driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA NA
6.1a Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in regulation? NA Yes NA NA
6.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA (ⅰ)コンサルティングを望む既存顧客が、同サービスを実施している他社に切り替わるおそれがある。また、このような省エネ対策が大きな関心事になっている中で、保険の新規開拓の切り口としてこのサービスを使えないことは、新規顧客開拓に際してマイナスとなる。(ⅱ)グループ会社であるインターリスク総研では、省エネ関連の法律、条例への対応から、実際に効果的な省エネ活動を行うための支援までを幅広く提供するコンサルティング事業を展開しており、これを活用する。(ⅲ) 新サービス開発にかかる費用、新規顧客開拓のために本サービスを NA NA
6.1c Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in physical climate parameters? NA Yes NA NA
14. Attachments NA NA NA NA
6.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA (ⅰ)お客さまニーズの捕捉失敗、またはニーズへの不対応(保険商品不供給)によって、商機を失います。さらにそうした対応によってお客さまからの信頼を失うことで、増収増益商機を失うばかりでなく、他の既存商圏に影響が及べば、減収減益に陥ることも考えられます。その可能性・大きさは不明です。(ⅱ)営業部門・代理店は、日々の営業活動を通じて、お客さまのニーズを的確に捕捉し、そうしたニーズに対応した保険商品の提供を行う営業態勢となっている。(ⅲ) 直接的かつ明示的に上記ⅱにかけている費用はない。 NA NA
6.1e Identified opportunities that are driven by changes in other climate-related developments? NA Yes NA NA
6.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA (ⅰ)企業のイメージアップを図り、顧客・市場から好評価を得て株価等が上昇する可能性があるが、機会管理活動を行わないことにより、この機会を失うことになる。(ⅱ)前記の規制によるリスク、物理的リスクにおいて記載した管理手法により、温暖化対策に対して取り組む。 NA NA
13. Attachments NA NA NA NA
11. Attachments NA NA NA NA
11. Further Information NA NA NA NA
11.1. Do you consider that the grid average factors used to report Scope 2 emissions in Question 8.3 reflect the contractual arrangements you have with electricity suppliers? NA No NA NA
11.1a. You may report a total contractual Scope 2 figure in response to this question. Please provide your total global contractual Scope 2 GHG emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 0 71002 17902000 NA
11.2. Has your organization retired any certificates, e.g. Renewable Energy Certificates, associated with zero or low carbon electricity within the reporting year or has this been done on your behalf? NA No NA NA
3.1e. Please explain (i) why not; and (ii) forecast how your emissions will change over the next five years NA NA NA NA
3.2. Does the use of your goods and/or services directly enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party? No No Yes NA
3.2a. Please provide details (see guidance) NA NA NA NA
3.3c Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities. 0 2 12 NA
3.3c. What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities? NA Compliance with regulatory requirements/standards, Dedicated budget for energy efficiency NA NA
5. Attachments NA NA NA NA
5. Further Information NA Q5.1c 温暖化が自然災害の発生頻度や強度に影響を与えたことが確認されて初めて「リスクの影響を受けた」ということになると考えます。タイ洪水などの大規模自然災害の発現は現実化していますが、こうした個別の自然現象と気候変動の因果関係は、現時点での科学では証明できないものと考えますので、「Unknown」と回答しています。 NA NA
5.1. Have you identified any climate change risks (current or future) that have potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Risks driven by changes in regulation; Risks driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA NA
5.1a Identified risks driven by changes in regulation? NA NA NA NA
5.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA (ⅰ) 省エネ法及び東京都条例に従わなかった場合には、公表、罰金等のペナルティーが課され、社会的に、当グループが温室効果ガス削減に非協力的な企業であると評価され、営業上不利益をこうむる可能性がある。(ⅱ) 法令を遵守するため、温室効果ガスの排出を削減する各種取組(照明・空調等の設備更新、次世代車の導入*、高効率のOA機器の導入等)を実施する。また、温室効果ガスの実績把握を行う必要があり、その把握のためのシステム構築を行う。*三井住友海上では、2010年度において、全社有車における低公害車の割合が98%を超 NA NA
14. Further Information NA NA NA NA
1.1. Where is the highest level of direct responsibility for climate change within your company? No individual or committee with overall responsibility for climate change Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board NA
1.1a. Please identify the position of the individual or name of the committee with this responsibility NA 総務担当役員 NA NA
1.2. Do you provide incentives for the management of climate change issues, including the attainment of targets? No Yes Yes NA
13. Further Information NA NA NA NA
13.1. How do your absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year compare to the previous year? Increased Decreased Decreased NA
13.1a (i) If absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) have increased, decreased or remained the same overall compared to the previous year, state direction of change NA General Decrease NA NA
13.1a (ii) If absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) have increased, decreased or remained the same overall compared to the previous year, state the reason for the direction of change NA Decrease: Emissions reduction activities NA NA
13.1a (iii) If emissions have increased, decreased or remained the same overall, provide the emissions value (%) NA Decrease: , Increase: 34 , Emission value for which direction is not stated: NA NA
2012 Score 0 78 100 NA
2012 Performance Band E B A NA
2.3a. Please explain (i) the engagement process and (ii) actions you are advocating NA 当グループでは、環境省が推奨する環境マネジメントシステム「エコアクション21」認証の取得支援をしている。三井住友海上社では、「アドバンスクラブ(整備工場代理店の組織)」でエコ整備に取り組む会員を対象に、各地域の推進事務局が講習の実施と継続的なフォローを実施する、「関係企業グリーン化プログラム」に参加して取り組みを進め、2012年3月末では312社が同認証を取得しました。また、あいおいニッセイ同和損保社でも、「あいおいニッセイ同和全国プロ会」とともに同プログラムに参加し、代理店のみならず地域の中小企業に認証 NA NA
8.8. Are carbon dioxide emissions from the combustion of biologically sequestered carbon (i.e. carbon dioxide emissions from burning biomass/biofuels) relevant to your company? No No Yes NA
8.8a. Please provide the emissions in metric tonnes CO2e 0.01 NA 27263000 NA
Management 4. Attachments NA NA NA NA
Management 4. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? NA 1 NA NA
5.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA (ⅰ) このリスクに対して、下記(ⅱ)に記載するようなリスク管理活動を行わない場合には、保険会社としてのリスク分散がなされていないため、巨額の 保険金支払いによる影響が直接的に収支につながることから、経営に対する影響が大きくなる。最悪の場合には、財務的な破綻を起こすことになる。 (ⅱ) 異常危険準備金の積み立てや再保険を手配し、巨大な保険金の支払いに備える等のリスク管理を行い、収益への影響を小さくしている。       (ⅲ) 再保険手配にかかる費用等 NA NA
2. Attachments NA NA NA NA
2. Further Information NA NA NA NA
5.1c Identified climate change risks driven by change in physical climate parameters? NA Yes NA NA
2.1. Please select the option that best describes your risk management procedures with regard to climate change risks and opportunities NA Integrated into multi-disciplinary company wide risk management processes NA NA
2.1a. Please provide further details (see guidance) NA 1.当グループでは、気候変動にかかわるリスクを自然災害の増加として保険引受リスク及び流動性リスクの増加と認識をしている。当グループではこれらのリスクの 管理方針をグループリスク管理基本方針に定めている。また、グループ内の保険会社は、この方針との整合性を確保した上で、各社の事業の規模や特性に応じたリスク管理の方針を定めるとともにリスク管理プロセスが実行される態勢を整えている。保険引受リスク管理方針:自然災害等に備えた準備金の確保等により、将来にわたって安定的で健全な保険引受・保険金支払を行うことのできる態勢 NA NA
2.2. Is climate change integrated into your business strategy? No Yes Yes NA
2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes (see guidance) NA 1.当グループでは、気候変動をもたらす温暖化ガスの排出削減に関して、2009年を基準年として、2020年にCO2排出量を30%削減する目標をたて取り組んでいる。省エネ法や東京都条例を遵守することにより、企業の社会的責任を果たしていくこととし、また、気候変動により生じる自然災害リスクは、保険会社の収支に大きな影響を与えることから、CO2排出削減に率先して取り組んでいる。2.当グループの19社は、国内約350拠点で環境ISO(ISO14001)の認証を取得して、企業活動に伴う環境に与える影響を自ら把握し、PD NA NA
2.2b. Please explain why not NA NA NA NA
2.3. Do you engage with policy makers to encourage further action on mitigation and/or adaptation? No Yes Yes NA
3. Attachments NA NA NA NA
3. Further Information NA Q3.2 MS&ADグループは保険・金融グループであることから、その商品・サービスが、直接GHGを削減するものではない。しかしグリーン電力関連プロジェクトへの融資、エコ安全ドライブや環境マネジメントシステム普及、及び省エネコンサルの実施により、間接的にGHGの削減には貢献している。 Q3.3a ①省エネ設備の導入 ②ISOにおける省エネ活動 ③インドネシアの植林 ④フィリピンでの植林 NA NA
3.1. Did you have an emissions reduction target that was active (ongoing or reached completion) in the reporting year? No Absolute target Absolute and intensity targets NA
14.1. Do you participate in any emission trading schemes? No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next two years No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next two years Yes NA
14.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? No No Yes NA
6.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
6.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
6.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
7. Attachments NA NA NA NA
7. Further Information NA NA NA NA
7.1. Please provide your base year and base year emissions (Scopes 1 and 2) NA NA NA NA
0.4. Currency selection Please select the currency in which you would like to submit your response. All financial information contained in the response should be in this currency. NA JPY(¥) NA NA
1. Attachments NA NA NA NA
1. Further Information NA NA NA NA
8.7. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 2 emissions More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% NA
11.1b. Explain the basis of the alternative figure (see guidance) 760万kWh分のグリーン電力量を購入し、グリーン電力証書にもとづき、この分の電力使用によるCO2排出はゼロとみなされる。したがって、7600千kWh×0.324=2462トンを、総量から除いている。 NA
14.1b. What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? NA NA
8.1. Please select the boundary you are using for your Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas inventory NA Other: 親会社及び管理下にある会社(直資事業会社+連結子会社が対象) NA NA
8.2a. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 92 23081 231902967 NA
8.3a. Please provide your gross global Scope 2 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 293 68540 8071070 NA
8.4. Are there are any sources (e.g. facilities, specific GHGs, activities, geographies, etc.) of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions which are not included in your disclosure? NA No NA NA
8.6. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 1 emissions More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% NA More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
8.8a. Please provide the emissions in metric tonnes CO2e 0.05 NA 13638000
0.4. Currency selection Please select the currency in which you would like to submit your response. All financial information contained in the response should be in this currency. JPY(¥)
0.6. Modules NA As part of the Investor CDP information request, electric utilities, companies with electric utility activities or assets, companies in the automobile or auto component manufacture sectors and companies in the oil and gas industry should complete suppleme
1. Attachments NA NA NA
1. Further Information NA NA NA
1.1. Where is the highest level of direct responsibility for climate change within your company? No individual or committee with overall responsibility for climate change Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board
1.2. Do you provide incentives for the management of climate change issues, including the attainment of targets? No Yes Yes
11. Attachments NA NA NA
11. Further Information NA NA NA
11.1. What percentage of your total operational spend in the reporting year was on energy? More than 0% but less than or equal to 5% More than 0% but less than or equal to 5% More than 95% but less than or equal to 100%
12. Attachments NA
12. Further Information NA
12.1. How do your absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year compare to the previous year? Increased
12.1a Reason of change Emissions reduction activities, Divestment, Acquisitions, Mergers, Change in output, Change in methodology, Change in boundary, Change in physical operating conditions, Unidentified, Other
14. Attachments NA NA NA
14. Further Information NA NA NA
14.1. Do you participate in any emission trading schemes? No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next two years No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next 2 years Yes
14.1b. What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? NA
14.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? No No Yes
2. Attachments NA NA NA
2. Further Information NA NA NA
2.1. Please select the option that best describes your risk management procedures with regard to climate change risks and opportunities NA Integrated into multi-disciplinary company wide risk management processes NA
2.1a. Please provide further details (see guidance) NA 1. 当グループでは、気候変動にかかわるリスクを自然災害の増加として保険引受リスク及び流動性リスクの増加と認識をしている。 2.当グループではこれらのリスクの管理方針をグループリスク管理基本方針に定めている。また、グループ内の保険会社は、この方針との整合性を確保した上で、各社の事業の規模や特性に応じたリスク管 理の方針を定めるとともにリスク管理プロセスが実行される態勢を整えている。 <保険引受リスク管理方針> 自然災害等に備えた準備金の確保等により、将来にわたって安定的で健全な保険引受・保険金支払を行うこ NA
2.2. Is climate change integrated into your business strategy? No Yes Yes
2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes (see guidance) NA 1.当グループでは、気候変動をもたらす温暖化ガスの排出削減に関して、2009年を基準年として、2020年にCO2排出量を30%削減する目標をたて取り組んでいる。省エネ法や東京都条例を遵守することにより、企業の社会的責任を果たしていくこととし、また、気候変動により生じる自然災害リスクは、保険会社の収支に大きな影響を与えることから、CO2排出削減に率先して取り組んでいる。また、2005年から、インドネシア林業省と連携し、不法伐採により劣化した野生動物保護林の修復と再生を行っており、植林した30万本からなる豊に NA
2.2b. Please explain why not NA NA NA
2.3. Do you engage in activities that could either directly or indirectly influence policy on climate change through any of the following? (tick all that apply) Yes
2.3a. Please explain (i) the engagement process and (ii) actions you are advocating NA 認証の取得支援を実施:三井住友海上社では、「アドバンスクラブ(整備工場代理店の組織)」エコ整備に取り組む会員を対象に、各地域の推進事務局が講習の実施と継続的なフォローを実施する、「関係企業グリーン化プログラム」に参加して取り組みを進め、2013年3月末で314社の会員が同認証を取得しました。また、あいおいニッセイ同和損保社でも、「あいおいニッセイ同和全国プロ会」とともに同プログラムに参加し、代理店のみならず地域の中小企業に認証取得への提案活動を展開し、これまで約900の代理店・企業が認証を取得し、地域の中 NA
2.3b. Are you on the Board of any trade associations or provide funding beyond membership? Yes
2.3d. Do you publically disclose a list of all the research organizations that you fund? NA
3. Attachments NA NA NA
3. Further Information NA 3.2: MS&ADグループは保険・金融グループであることから、その商品・サービスが、直接GHGを削減するものではない。しかしグリーン電力関連プロジェクトへの融資、エコ安全ドライブや環境マネジメントシステム普及、及び省エネコンサルの実施により、間接的にGHGの削減には貢献している。 NA
3.1. Did you have an emissions reduction target that was active (ongoing or reached completion) in the reporting year? No Absolute target Absolute and intensity targets
3.1e. Please explain (i) why not; and (ii) forecast how your emissions will change over the next five years NA NA NA
3.2. Does the use of your goods and/or services directly enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party? No No Yes
3.2a. Please provide details (see guidance) NA NA NA
3.3c Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities. 0 2 13 Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities.
3.3c. What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities? NA Compliance with regulatory requirements/standards, Dedicated budget for energy efficiency NA
4. Attachments NA
4. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? - Further Information NA
4.1. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? 2 The number of corporate annual reports and voluntary publications (complete and/or underway) made about the company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance
5. Attachments NA NA NA
5. Further Information NA 5.1c Timeframe "unknown" <コメント>本コメントは、「影響を受ける可能性の程度」、「影響の大きさの程度」と共通です。温暖化が自然災害の発生頻度や強度に影響を与えたことが確認されて初めて「リスクの影響を受けた」ということになると考えている。タイ洪水などの大規模自然災害の発現は現実化しているが、こうした個別の自然現象と気候変動の因果関係は、現時点での科学では証明できないものと考えるので、「Unknown」と回答している。但し、2011年のタイ洪水発生以降、海外自然災害 リスク管理上の NA
5.1. Have you identified any climate change risks (current or future) that have potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Risks driven by changes in regulation; Risks driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA
5.1a. Climate change risks driven by changes in regulation Yes
5.1c. Climate change risks driven by change in physical climate parameters Yes
5.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA 003-004 ⅰ. リスク管理活動を行わない場合のリスクによる財務影響 ・このリスクに対して、下記ⅱに記載するようなリスク管理活動を行わない場合には、保険会社としてのリスク分散がなされていないため、巨額の保険金支払いによる影響が直接的に収支につながることから、経営に対する影響が大きくなる。最悪の場合には、財務的な破綻を起こすことになる。  ⅱ. リスク管理の手法 ・異常危険準備金の積み立てや再保険を手配し、巨大な保険金の支払いに備える等のリスク管理を行い、収益への影響を小さくしている。 ⅲ. リスク NA
5.1e.Climate change risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments Yes
5.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA ⅰ.リスク管理活動を行わない場合の財務的影響   保険会社として培ってきたこれまでの信頼・実績があり、財務的な影響は小さいと考える。 ⅱ.リスク管理の手法 前記の「規制によるリスク」、「物理的影響によるリスク」に記載したリスク管理手法によりリスクを管理し、 気候変動に対する取組を着実に推進することにより、評判リスクが生じないようにする。 ⅲ.リスク管理にかかる費用 前記の「規制によるリスク」、「物理的影響によるリスク」に記載した費用がかかる。 NA
5.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
5.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
5.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
6. Attachments NA NA NA
6. Further Information NA 6.1c Timeframe, Likelihood, Magnitude of impact : "Unknown" 気候変動リスクとそのリスクのヘッジに関するお客さまニーズとの関係は不明です。現実に発生した個別の自然災害がお客さまのニーズ喚起の要因とはなり得ますが、こうした個別の自然災害と気候変動との因果関係の立証は不可能です。 NA
6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Opportunities driven by changes in regulation; Opportunities driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA
6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? -Transparency Yes
6.1a Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in regulation? NA Yes NA
6.1c. Please describe the opportunities that are driven by changes in physical climate parameters Yes
6.1e. Please describe the opportunities that are driven by changes in other climate-related developments Yes
6.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA Op003 i. 機会管理活動を行わない場合の機会による財務影響 当グループは、お客さまにニーズに合致した保険の提案、また、リスクマネジメントサービス等、保険 本来業務で企業力を高めており、この評判機会管理活動を行わない場合でも、その影響は小さいと思われる。 ⅱ 機会管理の手法 営業部門・代理店は、日々の営業活動を通じて、各種保険の提供・リスクマネジメントサービスの提案 等に合わせて、当社のこのような取り組みに関する情報も案内するようにしている。 ⅲ.機会管理にかかる費用 上記ⅱ.のように、営業部門・ NA
6.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
6.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
6.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
7. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/sites/2013/38/31538/Investor CDP 2013/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2013/7.EmissionsMethodology/問7 4排出係数.xls NA
7. Further Information NA Q7.4: 排出係数のエクセルデータを添付 NA
8.1. Please select the boundary you are using for your Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas inventory NA Financial control NA Boundary used for Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas inventory during 2011-2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.2. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 23005 Gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e for 2011 - 2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.3. Please provide your gross global Scope 2 emissions figures in metric tonnes CO2e 91241
8.4. Are there are any sources (e.g. facilities, specific GHGs, activities, geographies, etc.) of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions which are not included in your disclosure? NA No NA Proportion of Scope 1 emissions that are verified/assured for 2011 - 2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
2013 Performance Band E NA A NA
2013 Score 0 0 100 NA
0. Attachments NA NA NA If you have not been presented with a sector module that you consider would be appropriate for your company to answer, please select the module below. If you wish to view the questions first, please see https://www.cdproject.net/en-US/Programmes/Pages/Mor
0. Further Information NA NA NA If you are in these sectors (according to the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS)), the corresponding sector modules will be marked as default options to your information request. If you want to query your classification, please email respond@c
0.1. Introduction - Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. NA MS&ADインシュアランス グループ ホールディングス株式会社は、三井住友海上火災保険株式会社、あいおいニッセイ同和損害保険株式会社などのグループ保険会社を有する保険持株会社です。       設立年月日:2008年4月1日(2010年4月1日に社名変更)       本社所在地:東京都中央区八重洲1-3-7 八重洲ファーストフィナンシャルビル       代表者  :代表取締役社長 江頭 敏明(えがしら としあき)       資本金  :1,000億円 NA
Environmental Investment Organisation
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Reported Scope 3 Total (tCO2e) 670000000 9942 0 Indicated the total reported Scope 3 (all other indirect emissions) of the company in metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent (tCO2e) as defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol. Where no Scope 3 emissions are reported, this is recorded as "No Data"
Scope 1+2 Intensity 11162.43 2.51 0.3 Intensity is calculated by adding together a company's Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions and dividing by its turnover.
Global 800 Carbon Rank 800 344 1 Carbon Ranking of 800 international companies. Ranking is determined by EIO Methodology. See Source Info sheet for comments on it
No. of Scope 3 Categories Reported 1 1 15 This column indicates the number of Scope 3 Categories reported. Once placed into one of the four Disclosure Categories, companies are ranked by the number of Scope 3 categories disclosed.
Reported Scope 1+2 Total (tCO2e) 282000000 94084 843 The total reported Scope 1 (all direct emissions) and Scope 2 (indirect electricity emissions) of the company in metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent (tCO2e) as defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol
Accepted or Inferred Scope 3 Intensity 8547.13 531.72 64.51 Unless the company reports all 15 Scope 3 categories as defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Standard, an inferred figure based on the highest reported intensity for that sector, across the Global ET Universe, is shown
Category No Public Data Orange Public, Complete, and Verified data Companies are placed into one of four data or 'disclosure' categories: 1) Public, Complete, and Verified data; 2) Public, Complete, and Unverified data; 3) Public, Incomplete, Verified or Unverified data; 4) No Public Data
Combined Scope 1+2+3 Intensity 12161.68 268.37 34.24 Combined Scope 1+2_3 Intensity is calculated by adding together a company's Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions at 100% (disclosed or inferred) + 50% of Scope 3 emissions (disclosed or inferred).
Market Value ($Million) 1667.87 12488 358143.1 A company's market value, or market capitalism (number of shares times x share price). This value was taken on 23.08.2011
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Report reference ISO Standards? NA No NA NA
Sector NA Construction NA NA
Country (HQ) NA Netherlands NA NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Guidelines NA GRI - G3.1 NA This field indicates which version of the GRI Guidelines is used for the reporting. As of publication year 2009, GRI only includes reporting that makes use of the G3 Guidelines, which were released in October 2006.
Integrated No No Yes GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
Publication Year 2013 GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
Region NA Asia NA Region the organization operates in.
Report Html Address NA NA NA URL of the report location.
Report Pdf Address NA http://www.ms-ad-hd.com/en/csr/digest/pdf/csr_report2013_default.pdf NA Location of a PDF version of the report.
Report Title NA CSR Report 2013 NA Title of the report.
Sector NA Financial Services NA Industry sector.
Sector Supplements (Final) NA Not Applicable NA This field indicates if the reporting organization has made use of one of the final Sector Supplements and which one. If ‘not used’ is indicated, it means that one of the final Sector Supplements is applicable, but has not been used. If ‘not applicable’ i
Size NA MNE NA GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Envtl. Mgmt. 28.6 42.3 91.9 Based on an analysis of companies tracked in Sustainalytics’ Global Platform, the Environmental Management Score is an assessment of how a company manages its environmental performance through policies, programs, targets, certifications, and the like. To
Green Score 0 65.1 100 NA
Rank 500 141 1 NA
Disclosure 0 67.3 100 Environmental disclosure was included as a stand-alone score to assess each company’s transparency with regard to its environmental performance. Specifically, this score evaluates the breadth and quality of company environmen
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Corporate Governance 3 0 0 The scores for each ESG scope issue ranges from 0-3. The scoring refers to the number of times the company was criticized in relation to that scope issue: 0 = little or no exposure in the past 4 years; 1 = 5 direct relations in the past 4 years; 2 = 10 direct relations in the past 4 years; 3 = 20 direct relations in the past 4 years.
Current RRI 86 0 0 The RepRisk Index (RRI) is a quantitative risk measure that captures criticism and quantifies a company's exposure to controversial environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues. It does not measure a company's overall reputation, but rather is an indicator of their reputational risk.The Current RRI value indicates the current level of criticism about a company.
Employee Relations 3 0 0 The scores for each ESG scope issue ranges from 0-3. The scoring refers to the number of times the company was criticized in relation to that scope issue: 0 = little or no exposure in the past 4 years; 1 = 5 direct relations in the past 4 years; 2 = 10 direct relations in the past 4 years; 3 = 20 direct relations in the past 4 years.
Environmental FootPrint 3 0 0 The scores for each ESG scope issue ranges from 0-3. The scoring refers to the number of times the company was criticized in relation to that scope issue: 0 = little or no exposure in the past 4 years; 1 = 5 direct relations in the past 4 years; 2 = 10 direct relations in the past 4 years; 3 = 20 direct relations in the past 4 years.
United Against Nuclear Iran
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Value of USG Contracts (in millions) 990 NA 1 Value of Iranian contracts.
Withdrawn NA Was the association with Iran withdrawn?
Nationality Japan Country the company is in.
On the list Yes Yes Is the company on the list.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
include_continued_support_statement 0 1 1 NA
additional_questions 0 0 1 NA
cop_web_link NA http://www.unglobalcompact.org/COPs/detail/19977 NA NA
created_at NA 39793.0823 NA NA
differentiation NA active NA NA
ends_on NA 39507 NA NA
include_measurement 0 1 1 NA
meets_advanced_criteria 0 0 1 NA
method_shared NA gc_website NA NA
references_anti_corruption 0 1 1 NA
references_environment 0 1 1 NA
references_human_rights 0 1 1 NA
references_labour 0 1 1 NA
starts_on NA 39172 NA NA
title NA 2012 Communication on Progress NA NA
updated_at NA 39793.0823 NA NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
include_measurement 0 1 1 Does your COP identify targets, define performance indicators and measure outcomes?
references_anti_corruption 0 1 1 Does your COP contain description of actions, and when relevant policies, related to anti-corruption?
references_environment 0 1 1 Does your COP contain description of actions, and when relevant policies, related to the environment?
references_human_rights 0 1 1 Does your COP contain description of actions, and when relevant policies, related to human rights?
references_labour 0 1 1 Does your COP contain description of actions, and when relevant policies, related to labour rights?
starts_on NA 04/01/2012 NA Start Date
differentiation NA active NA At what level is the declarer?
ends_on NA 03/01/2013 NA End Date
format NA sustainability_report NA How is your COP shared with stakeholders?
You have put report(s) in your cart
Go to my cart
Ok