CSRHub is the world’s largest CSR (corporate social responsibility) and sustainability ratings and information database.

Kajima Corporation is a diversified Construction company based in Tokyo, Japan. The Company’s operations include Civil Engineering, Building Construction, Real Estate Development, Architectural Design, Civil Engineering Design, and Engineering. Founded in 1840, the company has over 8,400 employees and offices in regions including Asia, Europe, the Middle East, the U.S., and the U.K.

Ticker: 1812-TO ISIN: JP3210200006
Address: 1-3-1, Motoakasaka , Japan , Minato-ku , TKY , 107-8388 Website: KAJIMA CORPORATION
Phone #: 81-3-55441111 CSR Web Area: SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Basic Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Ratings

  Overall Community Employees Environment Governance
KAJIMA CORPORATION 55 53 53 64 44
Architectural, Engineering, & Related Services
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Heavy & Civil Engineering Construction
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Real Estate Management & Development
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
All company average 55 55 56 58 52
Japan
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Percentile Rankings

Rankings are in percentile terms, compared to other companies in the same industry and country Overall Community Employees Environment Governance
KAJIMA CORPORATION 48% 39% 35% 70% 20%
Architectural, Engineering, & Related Services
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Heavy & Civil Engineering Construction
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Real Estate Management & Development
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Japan
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Special Issues:

Ratings History

Only subscribers can interact with the graph.

More CSR Rating Details

  Community Employees
Community Dev & Philanthropy Product Human Rights & Supply Chain Compensation & Benefits Diversity & Labor Rights Training, Health & Safety
KAJIMA CORPORATION
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Architectural, Engineering, & Related Services
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Heavy & Civil Engineering Construction
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Real Estate Management & Development
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
All company average 53 54 55 58 55 55
Japan
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Environment Governance
Energy & Climate Change Environmant Policy & Reporting Resource Management Board Leadership Ethics Transparency & Reporting
KAJIMA CORPORATION
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Architectural, Engineering, & Related Services
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Heavy & Civil Engineering Construction
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Real Estate Management & Development
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
All company average 57 58 57 50 55 51
Japan
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Percentile rankings

Rankings are in percentile terms, compared to other companies in the same industry and country Community Employees
Community Dev & Philantrophy Product Human Rights & Supply Chain Compensation & Benefits Diversity & Labor Rights Training, Health & Safety
KAJIMA CORPORATION
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Architectural, Engineering, & Related Services
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Heavy & Civil Engineering Construction
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Real Estate Management & Development
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Japan
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Environment Governance
Energy & Climate Change Environment Policy & Reporting Resource Management Board Leadership Ethics Transparency & Reporting
KAJIMA CORPORATION
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Architectural, Engineering, & Related Services
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Heavy & Civil Engineering Construction
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Real Estate Management & Development
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Japan
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

0 Special Issues Affect This Company (see a list of issues here)

# of Sources
Architectural, Engineering, & Related Services
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Heavy & Civil Engineering Construction
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Real Estate Management & Development
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Overall database
Japan
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

CSRHub Has 22 Data Sources (16 Are Currently Active) for This Company

= sources impacting the current ratings
= sources not impacting the current ratings, but included in earlier ratings for this company
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Original Data Values

(unsubscribed users can see the list, subscribers can see the data details for most sources)

Data source name

Data source element name Minimum value Value provided by datasource Maximum value Data description
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Brand Value / Enterprise Value (%) -48.164682123 0.0511 316.6056 NA
Brand Value 2012 431.6002 NA
BSI 50 62.5709 88.4717 NA
Domicile JAPAN NA
Enterprise Value NA 8441.47 NA NA
Reviewed ? No response NA
Sector Industrial NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Brand Value 2013 11.095 1959.0115 67875.2014 NA
BSI 50 62.5709 89.6275 NA
Domicile JAPAN NA
Sector Industrial NA
Reviewed RY NA
Brand Rating 2013 BBB A+ AAA+ NA
Enterprise Value 2013 0 6553.6095 435750.9811
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
0. Further Information NA Annual Report2011 ,CSR Report 2011 are attached for your reference. NA NA
0.1. Introduction - Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. NA Kajima is general construction firm and its business fields are designing, construction and engineering in the field of civil engineering and construction. Group-wide sales in fiscal 2011: Number of employees: Environmental features largely depend o NA NA
5.1e Identified climate change risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments? NA Yes NA NA
5.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA E1 ⅰno data ⅱimplementation of environmental management, development of technology that contributes the strengthening the environmental proposals ⅲmanagement cost: 360 million Japanese yen Development cost of environment-related technology : 3.4 billion NA NA
5.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
5.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
5.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
6. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/62/9962/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/6.ClimateChangeOpportunities/The new method for CO2 capture and storage.doc NA NA
6. Further Information NA NA NA NA
6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Opportunities driven by changes in regulation; Opportunities driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA NA
6.1a Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in regulation? NA Yes NA NA
6.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA A1、A2、A4 ⅰOur market size of new construction and reconstruction of the energy-saving building :1,300 billion yen ⅱStrengthen the proposal ability by energy-saving-related technical development ⅲRelated technique development cost: 2 billion yen A3 ⅰThe am NA NA
6.1c Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in physical climate parameters? NA Yes NA NA
14. Attachments NA NA NA NA
6.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA A1 ⅰOur market size of disaster prevention institutions such as shore protection: 28 billion yen ⅱTechnical development of a shore protection reinforcement construction method ⅲTechnical development cost: 700 million yen A2 ⅰOur market size of new constru NA NA
6.1e Identified opportunities that are driven by changes in other climate-related developments? NA Yes NA NA
6.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA A1 ⅰOur market size of new construction and reconstruction of the energy-saving building :1,300 billion yen ⅱStrengthen the proposal ability by energy-saving-related technical developmentⅲRelated technical development cost: 2 billion yen NA NA
13. Attachments NA NA NA NA
11. Attachments NA NA NA NA
11. Further Information NA NA NA
11.1. Do you consider that the grid average factors used to report Scope 2 emissions in Question 8.3 reflect the contractual arrangements you have with electricity suppliers? NA Yes NA NA
11.1a. You may report a total contractual Scope 2 figure in response to this question. Please provide your total global contractual Scope 2 GHG emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 0 NA 17902000 NA
11.2. Has your organization retired any certificates, e.g. Renewable Energy Certificates, associated with zero or low carbon electricity within the reporting year or has this been done on your behalf? NA Yes NA NA
3.1e. Please explain (i) why not; and (ii) forecast how your emissions will change over the next five years NA NA NA NA
3.2. Does the use of your goods and/or services directly enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party? No Yes Yes NA
3.2a. Please provide details (see guidance) NA (ⅰ) (ii)Drastic reduction of energy use in the operation of the buildings could be expected through the improving the thermal insulating of designed buildings and facility efficiency and rationalization of management systems without sacrificing the amenit NA NA
3.3c Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities. 0 3 12 NA
3.3c. What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities? NA Compliance with regulatory requirements/standards, Dedicated budget for low carbon product R&D, Dedicated budget for other emission reduction activities NA NA
5. Attachments NA NA NA NA
5. Further Information NA NA NA NA
5.1. Have you identified any climate change risks (current or future) that have potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Risks driven by changes in regulation; Risks driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA NA
5.1a Identified risks driven by changes in regulation? NA Yes NA NA
5.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA A1 ⅰno data ⅱtechnical advantages and reduction of the usage of materials by the new construction methodology. ⅲresearch and development cost: 1.4 billion Japanese yen. (material field) A2 ⅰno dataⅱ technical advantages and reduction of the usage of mater NA NA
14. Further Information NA NA NA NA
1.1. Where is the highest level of direct responsibility for climate change within your company? No individual or committee with overall responsibility for climate change Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board NA
1.1a. Please identify the position of the individual or name of the committee with this responsibility NA (i)Group-wide Environmental committees (chairman of committee: President and Representative Director) (ii) This is the highest decision making body for climate change within our Kajima Group. NA NA
1.2. Do you provide incentives for the management of climate change issues, including the attainment of targets? No Yes Yes NA
13. Further Information NA NA NA NA
13.1. How do your absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year compare to the previous year? Increased Increased Decreased NA
13.1a (i) If absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) have increased, decreased or remained the same overall compared to the previous year, state direction of change NA Moderately Increased NA NA
13.1a (ii) If absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) have increased, decreased or remained the same overall compared to the previous year, state the reason for the direction of change NA Decrease: Change in output NA NA
13.1a (iii) If emissions have increased, decreased or remained the same overall, provide the emissions value (%) NA Decrease: 1.98, Increase: , Emission value for which direction is not stated: NA NA
2012 Score 0 82 100 NA
2012 Performance Band E C A NA
2.3a. Please explain (i) the engagement process and (ii) actions you are advocating NA The engagement process 1 (i) As a member of Japan Federation of Construction Contractors, Kajima attends the ZEB(Zero Energy Building) meeting held by Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI)(ii) Supporting the formulation of policy(iii) Attending NA NA
8.8. Are carbon dioxide emissions from the combustion of biologically sequestered carbon (i.e. carbon dioxide emissions from burning biomass/biofuels) relevant to your company? No Yes Yes NA
8.8a. Please provide the emissions in metric tonnes CO2e 0.01 53 27263000 NA
Management 4. Attachments NA https://webadmin.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/62/9962/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/4.Communication/Annual Report 2011.4-2012.3.pdf NA NA
Management 4. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? NA 2 NA NA
5.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA C1 ⅰno data (increase of the cost of construction insurance, restoration cost, and retardation compensation) ⅱutilizing the local weather forecast service, preparation for emergency response (preparation of equipment, implementation of trainings) ⅲ instal NA NA
2. Attachments NA https://webadmin.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/62/9962/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/2.Strategy/csr_e_32.pdf NA NA
2. Further Information NA NA NA NA
5.1c Identified climate change risks driven by change in physical climate parameters? NA Yes NA NA
2.1. Please select the option that best describes your risk management procedures with regard to climate change risks and opportunities NA Integrated into multi-disciplinary company wide risk management processes NA NA
2.1a. Please provide further details (see guidance) NA (i)Risks / OpportunitiesReinforcement of Energy-saving standard, the increase of societal demand for emission reduction at construction sites and buildings(ii)Impact to the operationsIncrease of competition in the proposal for energy-saving, improvement o NA NA
2.2. Is climate change integrated into your business strategy? No Yes Yes NA
2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes (see guidance) NA (i)Influence to climate change related businessLow-carbon will continue to be the most important issue in the greening.After the great earthquake happened in March, 2011 and reduction of nuclear power, the societal demand for curbing the energy is increas NA NA
2.2b. Please explain why not NA NA NA NA
2.3. Do you engage with policy makers to encourage further action on mitigation and/or adaptation? No Yes Yes NA
3. Attachments NA NA NA NA
3. Further Information NA NA NA NA
3.1. Did you have an emissions reduction target that was active (ongoing or reached completion) in the reporting year? No Absolute and intensity targets Absolute and intensity targets NA
14.1. Do you participate in any emission trading schemes? No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next two years No, but we anticipate doing so in the next two years Yes NA
14.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? No Yes Yes NA
6.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
6.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
6.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
7. Attachments NA NA NA NA
7. Further Information NA NA NA NA
7.1. Please provide your base year and base year emissions (Scopes 1 and 2) NA NA NA NA
0.4. Currency selection Please select the currency in which you would like to submit your response. All financial information contained in the response should be in this currency. NA JPY(¥) NA NA
1. Attachments NA NA NA NA
1. Further Information NA NA NA NA
8.7. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 2 emissions More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% NA
11.1b. Explain the basis of the alternative figure (see guidance) NA NA
14.1b. What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? Strengthen of emission reduction activities at construction sites. Overachieved reduction volume at certain construction site would be allocated to another sites where more emission reduction is needed. Generating the green electricity at affiliated compa NA
8.1. Please select the boundary you are using for your Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas inventory NA Financial control NA NA
8.2a. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 92 161272 231902967 NA
8.3a. Please provide your gross global Scope 2 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 293 59114 8071070 NA
8.4. Are there are any sources (e.g. facilities, specific GHGs, activities, geographies, etc.) of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions which are not included in your disclosure? NA Yes NA NA
8.6. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 1 emissions More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% NA More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
8.8a. Please provide the emissions in metric tonnes CO2e 0.05 NA 13638000
0.4. Currency selection Please select the currency in which you would like to submit your response. All financial information contained in the response should be in this currency. JPY(¥)
0.6. Modules NA As part of the Investor CDP information request, electric utilities, companies with electric utility activities or assets, companies in the automobile or auto component manufacture sectors and companies in the oil and gas industry should complete suppleme
1. Attachments NA NA NA
1. Further Information NA NA NA
1.1. Where is the highest level of direct responsibility for climate change within your company? No individual or committee with overall responsibility for climate change Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board
1.2. Do you provide incentives for the management of climate change issues, including the attainment of targets? No Yes Yes
11. Attachments NA NA NA
11. Further Information NA NA NA
11.1. What percentage of your total operational spend in the reporting year was on energy? More than 0% but less than or equal to 5% More than 0% but less than or equal to 5% More than 95% but less than or equal to 100%
12. Attachments NA
12. Further Information NA
12.1. How do your absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year compare to the previous year? Increased
12.1a Reason of change Emissions reduction activities, Divestment, Acquisitions, Mergers, Change in output, Change in methodology, Change in boundary, Change in physical operating conditions, Unidentified, Other
14. Attachments NA NA NA
14. Further Information NA NA NA
14.1. Do you participate in any emission trading schemes? No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next two years Yes Yes
14.1b. What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? We stock the surplus for other buildings under the obligation.
14.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? No Yes Yes
2. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/sites/2013/62/9962/Investor CDP 2013/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2013/2.Strategy/2013-05-01KIビルのZEB化改修実証実験・省エネ率50%を達成.pdf NA
2. Further Information NA NA NA
2.1. Please select the option that best describes your risk management procedures with regard to climate change risks and opportunities NA Integrated into multi-disciplinary company wide risk management processes NA
2.1a. Please provide further details (see guidance) NA (i)Risks / OpportunitiesReinforcement of Energy-saving standard, the increase of social demand for emission reduction at construction sites and office buildings(ii)Impact to the operationsIncrease of competition in the proposal for energy-saving, improvem NA
2.2. Is climate change integrated into your business strategy? No Yes Yes
2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes (see guidance) NA (i)Influence to climate change related businessLow-carbon will continue to be the most important issue in the greening.After the great earthquake happened in March, 2011 and reduction of nuclear power, the societal demand for curbing the energy is increas NA
2.2b. Please explain why not NA NA NA
2.3. Do you engage in activities that could either directly or indirectly influence policy on climate change through any of the following? (tick all that apply) Yes
2.3a. Please explain (i) the engagement process and (ii) actions you are advocating NA Head of Environment Division participated as a member in public-private meeting with the Ministry of the Environment executive, whose theme is smoothing promotion of environmental policy in Japan, including the promotion of using renewable energy. NA
2.3b. Are you on the Board of any trade associations or provide funding beyond membership? NA
2.3d. Do you publically disclose a list of all the research organizations that you fund? NA
3. Attachments NA NA NA
3. Further Information NA NA NA
3.1. Did you have an emissions reduction target that was active (ongoing or reached completion) in the reporting year? No Absolute and intensity targets Absolute and intensity targets
3.1e. Please explain (i) why not; and (ii) forecast how your emissions will change over the next five years NA NA NA
3.2. Does the use of your goods and/or services directly enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party? No Yes Yes
3.2a. Please provide details (see guidance) NA ⅰ.We design, construct the low carbon emission buildings.Drastic reduction of energy use in the operation of the buildings could be expected through the improving the thermal insulating of our designed buildings and facility efficiency and rationalization NA
3.3c Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities. 0 3 13 Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities.
3.3c. What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities? NA Compliance with regulatory requirements/standards, Dedicated budget for low carbon product R&D, Employee engagement NA
4. Attachments NA
4. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? - Further Information NA
4.1. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? 1 The number of corporate annual reports and voluntary publications (complete and/or underway) made about the company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance
5. Attachments NA NA NA
5. Further Information NA NA NA
5.1. Have you identified any climate change risks (current or future) that have potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Risks driven by changes in regulation; Risks driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA
5.1a. Climate change risks driven by changes in regulation Yes
5.1c. Climate change risks driven by change in physical climate parameters Yes
5.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA C1 ⅰAssuming a negative impact of a few percent to the 24.6 billion yen ordinary income for 2012 of the Company by the following factors. :increase of the cost of construction insurance, restoration cost, and retardation compensation) ⅱutilizing the local NA
5.1e.Climate change risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments Yes
5.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA E1 ⅰno data ⅱWe look to effectively engage our stakeholders in relation to implementation of environmental management and to keep them informed of our progress through detailed and regular reporting through CSR report ⅲmanagement cost: 360 million Japanes NA
5.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
5.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
5.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
6. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/sites/2013/62/9962/Investor CDP 2013/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2013/6.ClimateChangeOpportunities/2013-05-08栃木県那須町で大規模太陽光発電事業が着工.pdf NA
6. Further Information NA We have embarked on a mega solar project taking advantage of the company-owned idle land. We have built a power plant 2MW currently. NA
6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Opportunities driven by changes in regulation; Opportunities driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA
6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? -Transparency Yes
6.1a Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in regulation? NA Yes NA
6.1c. Please describe the opportunities that are driven by changes in physical climate parameters Yes
6.1e. Please describe the opportunities that are driven by changes in other climate-related developments Yes
6.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA A1 ⅰOur market size of new construction and reconstruction of the energy-saving building :1.8trillion yen ⅱIntroducing energy saving technology at remodeling to promote the dissemination of technology PR and utilized as show window and demonstration faci NA
6.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
6.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
6.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
7. Attachments NA NA NA
7. Further Information NA NA NA
8.1. Please select the boundary you are using for your Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas inventory NA Financial control NA Boundary used for Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas inventory during 2011-2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.2. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 158879 Gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e for 2011 - 2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.3. Please provide your gross global Scope 2 emissions figures in metric tonnes CO2e 78201
8.4. Are there are any sources (e.g. facilities, specific GHGs, activities, geographies, etc.) of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions which are not included in your disclosure? NA Yes NA Proportion of Scope 1 emissions that are verified/assured for 2011 - 2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
2013 Performance Band E NA A NA
2013 Score 0 0 100 NA
0. Attachments NA NA NA If you have not been presented with a sector module that you consider would be appropriate for your company to answer, please select the module below. If you wish to view the questions first, please see https://www.cdproject.net/en-US/Programmes/Pages/Mor
0. Further Information NA NA NA If you are in these sectors (according to the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS)), the corresponding sector modules will be marked as default options to your information request. If you want to query your classification, please email respond@c
0.1. Introduction - Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. NA Kajima is general construction firm and its business fields are designing, construction and engineering in the field of civil engineering and construction. Group-wide sales in fiscal 2012: 14,85 billion yen Number of employees: 7,737 Environmental feat NA
Glassdoor
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
ceo:numberOfRatings 1 1 4026 The number of ratings of the CEO
ceo:pctApprove 0 0 100 Percent of ratings of the CEO that were approving
ceo:title NA The title of the company's CEO
employer:numberOfRatings 1 1 6549 The number of Glassdoor users who have rated this company as a place to work.
Glassdoor Employer Ratings 1 5 5 The Top Companies for Work-Life Balance list is based on employee feedback shared in company reviews on Glassdoor.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Size NA NA NA NA
Region NA Asia NA NA
Report Html Address NA http://www.kajima.com/english/csr/report/index.html#dl NA NA
Report Pdf Address NA http://www.kajima.com/english/csr/report/2012/pdf/csr_e_all.pdf NA NA
Report reference IFC Performance Standards? NA NA NA NA
Report reference ISO Standards? NA NA NA NA
Report Title NA CSR Report 2012 NA NA
Sector NA Conglomerates NA NA
Sector Supplements (Final) NA NA NA NA
Application Level Undeclared Undeclared A+ G3 Application Levels indicate to which extent the GRI Guidelines have been utilized in the reporting and which set and number of disclosures have been addressed in the reporting. There are three Application Levels A, B and C.
Country (HQ) NA Japan NA NA
Date Added To Sr List NA March 27, 2013 NA NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Corporate Governance 3 0 0 The scores for each ESG scope issue ranges from 0-3. The scoring refers to the number of times the company was criticized in relation to that scope issue: 0 = little or no exposure in the past 4 years; 1 = 5 direct relations in the past 4 years; 2 = 10 direct relations in the past 4 years; 3 = 20 direct relations in the past 4 years.
Current RRI 86 22 0 The RepRisk Index (RRI) is a quantitative risk measure that captures criticism and quantifies a company's exposure to controversial environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues. It does not measure a company's overall reputation, but rather is an indicator of their reputational risk.The Current RRI value indicates the current level of criticism about a company.
Employee Relations 3 0.6 0 The scores for each ESG scope issue ranges from 0-3. The scoring refers to the number of times the company was criticized in relation to that scope issue: 0 = little or no exposure in the past 4 years; 1 = 5 direct relations in the past 4 years; 2 = 10 direct relations in the past 4 years; 3 = 20 direct relations in the past 4 years.
Environmental FootPrint 3 0.4 0 The scores for each ESG scope issue ranges from 0-3. The scoring refers to the number of times the company was criticized in relation to that scope issue: 0 = little or no exposure in the past 4 years; 1 = 5 direct relations in the past 4 years; 2 = 10 direct relations in the past 4 years; 3 = 20 direct relations in the past 4 years.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Weighted score 1.2 3.4 5.9

Flags

(Other Indicators - things that don’t affect ratings but that help identify or classify companies)

SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
You have put report(s) in your cart
Go to my cart
Ok