CSRHub is the world’s largest CSR (corporate social responsibility) and sustainability ratings and information database.

Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated

Subscribe to see all available data

Jones Lang LaSalle is a financial and professional services firm specializing in real estate services and investment management. The company employs more than 30,000 people in 750 locations in 60 countries to serve the local, regional and global real estate needs of its clients. Services include Agency Leasing, Consulting, Corporate Capital Markets, Energy and Sustainability, Corporate Solutions, Facility Management, Government Services, Hotels, Investment Management, Investment Sales and Acquisitions, Project and Development Service, Property and Asset Management, Real Estate Investment Banking, Research, Retail, Tenant Representation, Valuation and Value Recovery Services.

Ticker: JLL ISIN: US48020Q1076
Address: 200 East Randolph Drive , USA , Chicago , IL , 60601 Website: Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated
Phone #: 312-7825800 CSR Web Area: SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Basic Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Ratings

  Overall Community Employees Environment Governance
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated 66 64 70 66 64
Real Estate Agents
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Real Estate Management & Development
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
All company average 55 55 56 58 52
USA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Percentile Rankings

Rankings are in percentile terms, compared to other companies in the same industry and country Overall Community Employees Environment Governance
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated 96% 84% 90% 76% 85%
Real Estate Agents
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Real Estate Management & Development
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
USA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Special Issues: Gay & Lesbian Sensitive

Ratings History

Only subscribers can interact with the graph.

More CSR Rating Details

  Community Employees
Community Dev & Philanthropy Product Human Rights & Supply Chain Compensation & Benefits Diversity & Labor Rights Training, Health & Safety
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Real Estate Agents
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Real Estate Management & Development
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
All company average 53 54 55 58 55 55
USA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Environment Governance
Energy & Climate Change Environmant Policy & Reporting Resource Management Board Leadership Ethics Transparency & Reporting
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Real Estate Agents
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Real Estate Management & Development
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
All company average 57 58 57 50 55 51
USA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Percentile rankings

Rankings are in percentile terms, compared to other companies in the same industry and country Community Employees
Community Dev & Philantrophy Product Human Rights & Supply Chain Compensation & Benefits Diversity & Labor Rights Training, Health & Safety
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated 90% 81% 75% 93% 89% 82%
Real Estate Agents
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Real Estate Management & Development
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
USA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Environment Governance
Energy & Climate Change Environment Policy & Reporting Resource Management Board Leadership Ethics Transparency & Reporting
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated 85% 77% 71% 87% 90% 69%
Real Estate Agents
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Real Estate Management & Development
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
USA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

1 Special Issues Affect This Company (see a list of issues here)

Gay & Lesbian Sensitive
# of Sources 1
# of co. % of co.
Real Estate Agents
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Real Estate Management & Development
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Overall database 266 2.8
USA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

CSRHub Has 36 Data Sources (24 Are Currently Active) for This Company

= sources impacting the current ratings
= sources not impacting the current ratings, but included in earlier ratings for this company
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Original Data Values

(unsubscribed users can see the list, subscribers can see the data details for most sources)

Data source name

Data source element name Minimum value Value provided by datasource Maximum value Data description
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Brand Value / Enterprise Value (%) -48.164682123 0.1973 316.6056 NA
Brand Value 2012 488.1316 NA
BSI 50 68.1021 88.4717 NA
Domicile UNITED STATES NA
Enterprise Value NA 2473.603 NA NA
Reviewed ? No response NA
Sector Financial NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
8.7. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 2 emissions No third party verification or assurance Proportion of Scope 2 emissions that are verified/assured for 2011-2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.7a. Please indicate the proportion of your Scope 2 emissions that are verified/assured More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% NA More than 90% but less than or equal to 100%
8.7b Reporting Period From/To/Please provide further details of the verification/assurance undertaken, and attach the relevant statements/Type of verification or assurance/Relevant standard/Attach the document No Response
8.8. Are carbon dioxide emissions from biologically sequestered carbon relevant to your organization? No
8.8a. Please provide the emissions in metric tonnes CO2 NA
9.1. Do you have Scope 1 emissions sources in more than one country? Yes
9.1a Reporting Period From/To/Please complete the table below: Country/Region/Scope 1 metric tonnes CO2e 1 Jan 2011/31 Dec 2011/China/15.49
9.2. Please indicate which other Scope 1 emissions breakdowns you are able to provide (tick all that apply) NA By facility; By GHG type NA
9.2a Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by business division: Business division/Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) No Response
9.2b Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by facility: Facility/Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) No Response
9.2c Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by GHG type: GHG type/Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) 1 Jan 2011/31 Dec 2011/CO2/11165.75
9.2d Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by activity: Activity/Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) No Response
9.2e Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by legal structure: Legal structure/Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) No Response
0.3. Country list configuration United States of America
0.4. Please select the currency in which you would like to submit your response. USD($)
0.5. Please select if you wish to complete a shorter information request. NA
1.1. Where is the highest level of direct responsibility for climate change within your company? No individual or committee with overall responsibility for climate change Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board
1.1a. Please identify the position of the individual or name of the committee with this responsibility NA The Board of Directors takes an active role in overseeing the Company’s sustainability efforts, drawing on progress updates from the following bodies that represent the pillars of our sustainability strategy:• The Global Energy and Sustainability Services NA
1.2. Do you provide incentives for the management of climate change issues, including the attainment of targets? No Yes Yes
1.2a. Who is entitled to benefit from these incentives? Chief Operating Officer (COO)/Monetary reward/
10.1. Do you have Scope 2 emissions sources in more than one country? Yes
10.1a Reporting Period: From/To/Please complete the table below: Country/Region/Scope 2 metric tonnes CO2e/Purchased and consumed electricity, heat, steam or cooling (MWh)/Purchased and consumed low carbon electricity, heat, steam or cooling (MWh) 1 Jan 2011/31 Dec 2011/Australia/1431.54//
10.2. Please indicate which other Scope 2 emissions breakdowns you are able to provide (tick all that apply) NA By facility NA
10.2a Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by business division: Business division/Scope 2 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) No Response
10.2b Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by facility: Facility/Scope 2 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) 1 Jan 2011/31 Dec 2011/See note and attached document below./
10.2c Reporting Period: From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by activity: Activity/Scope 2 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) No Response
10.2d Reporting Period: From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by legal structure: Legal structure/Scope 2 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) No Response
11.1. What percentage of your total operational spend in the reporting year was on energy? More than 0% but less than or equal to 5% More than 0% but less than or equal to 5% More than 95% but less than or equal to 100%
11.2. Please state how much fuel, electricity, heat, steam, and cooling in MWh your organization has purchased and consumed during the reporting year: Energy type/MWh Fuel/37850.67;Electricity/19828.41;Heat/;Steam/;Cooling/
11.3. Please complete the table by breaking down the total "Fuel" figure entered above by fuel type: Fuels/MWh Natural gas/1285.21
11.4. Please provide details of the electricity, heat, steam or cooling amounts that were accounted at a low carbon emission factor: Basis for applying a low carbon emission factor/MWh associated with low carbon electricity, heat, steam or cooling No purchases or generation of low carbon electricity, heat, steam or cooling/
12.1. How do your absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year compare to the previous year? Decreased
12.1a. Reason: Emissions value (percentage) Emissions reduction activities: 10/Change in output: 9/
12.2. Please describe your gross combined Scope 1 and 2 emissions for the reporting year in metric tonnes CO2e per revenue: Intensity figure/Metric numerator/% change from previous year/Direction of change from previous year/Reason for change 5.56/metric tonnes CO2e/9/Decrease/Please note the unit of total revenue is Million $USD. Our business activity has strengthened, with our revenue rising by 10% 2011 to 2012. This correlates with an increase in corporate offices and employees. Our Mobi
12.3. Please describe your gross combined Scope 1 and 2 emissions for the reporting year in metric tonnes CO2e per FTE: Intensity figure/Metric numerator/% change from previous year/Direction of change from previous year/Reason for change 0.46/metric tonnes CO2e/6/Decrease/Jones Lang LaSalle has increased its number of employees by 5% from 2011 to 2012. Our Mobile Engineering Services (MES) fleet in the U.S. accounts for 88% of company-owned vehicles emissions in 2012.
12.4. Please provide an additional intensity (normalized) metric that is appropriate to your business operations: Intensity figure/Metric numerator/% change from previous year/Direction of change from previous year/Reason for change 1.36/metric tonnes CO2e/5/Decrease/This intensity metric normalizes our Scope 1 and 2 emissions by the number of corporate office employees, thereby accounting for those who consume energy in our occupied space. We feel this measure is the most accurate r
13.1. Do you participate in any emissions trading schemes? No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next 2 years
13.1b. What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? NA
13.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? No
14.2. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 3 emissions No third party verification or assurance
14.2a. Please indicate the proportion of your Scope 3 emissions that are verified/assured NA
14.3. Are you able to compare your Scope 3 emissions for the reporting year with those for the previous year for any sources? Yes
14.4. Do you engage with any of the elements of your value chain on GHG emissions and climate change strategies? (Tick all that apply) Yes, our suppliers; Yes, our customers
14.4a. Please give details of methods of engagement, your strategy for prioritizing engagements and measures of success Suppliers: We expect all vendors, meaning any Jones Lang LaSalle or individual providing a product or service to Jones Lang LaSalle or indirectly to our clients as a contractor or subcontractor, to adhere to the Jones Lang LaSalle Vendor Code of Conduct.
14.4d. Please explain why not and any plans you have to develop an engagement strategy in the future NA
2.1. Please select the option that best describes your risk management procedures with regard to climate change risks and opportunities NA Integrated into multi-disciplinary company wide risk management processes NA
2.1a. Please provide further details We approach enterprise risk issues in a coordinated way across the globe. We govern our enterprise risk program primarily through our Global Operating Committee (GOC), which includes our Global Chief Financial Officer, our business segment Chief Operating
2.2. Is climate change integrated into your business strategy? No Yes Yes
2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes i) As a leading provider of integrated real estate services, we recognize our significant opportunity to drive change globally. We commit to minimizing the environmental impact of real estate, as well as enhancing the economic and social benefits of rea
2.2b. Please explain why not NA NA NA
2.3. Do you engage with policy makers to encourage further action on mitigation and/or adaptation? No Yes Yes
2.3a. On what issues have you been engaging directly?: Focus of legislation/Corporate Position/Details of engagement/Proposed solution Energy efficiency/Support with minor exceptions/We engage with industry organisations, trade associations and national government across our countries of operation to advise on climate-change related policy specific to the property sector, such as energy
2.3b. Are you on the Board of any trade associations or provide funding beyond membership? Yes
2.3c. Please enter the details of those trade associations that are likely to take a position on climate change legislation/Trade association Multiple national and international industry bodies specific to the property sector./Unknown/We have close relationships with many leading industry organizations including, importantly, numerous local green building councils worldwide that actively contri
2.3d. Do you publically disclose a list of all the research organizations that you fund? NA
2.3e. Do you fund any research organizations to produce public work on climate change? NA
2.3f. Please describe the work and how it aligns with your own strategy on climate change NA
2.3g. Please provide details of the other engagement activities that you undertake We are involved in the following global industry initiatives: • Cancun Communiqué: Jones Lang LaSalle became a signatory to the Cancun Communiqué on Climate Change in 2010. Along with over 1,000 other businesses, we made a public statement in support of a
2.3h. What processes do you have in place to ensure that all of your direct and indirect activities that influence policy are consistent with your overall climate change strategy? As a diverse global organization whose constituencies will inevitably have very different views of social and other issues, our political and lobbying activities are intentionally minimal and limited to supporting specific industry issues that would clear
2.3i. Please explain why you do not engage with policy makers NA
3.1. Did you have an emissions reduction target that was active (ongoing or reached completion) in the reporting year? No No Absolute and intensity targets
3.1a. Absolute target/ID/Scope/% of emissions in scope/% reduction from base year/Base year/Base year emissions (metric tonnes CO2e)/Target year/Comment No Response
3.1b. Intensity target/ID/Scope/% of emissions in scope/% reduction from base year/Metric/Base year/Normalized base year emissions/Target year/Comment No Response
3.1c. What change in absolute emissions this intensity target reflects/ID/Direction of change anticipated in absolute Scope 1+2 emissions at target completion?/% change anticipated in absolute Scope 1+2 emissions No Response
3.1d. Please provide details on your progress against this target made in the reporting year/ID/% complete (time)/% complete (emissions)/Comment No Response
3.1e. Please explain (i) why not; and (ii) forecast how your emissions will change over the next five years NA (i) While we have not publically declared a quantitative global emissions reduction target at the time of this submission, we have worked over the last year to develop a target so that we can confidently and robustly track our progress in future. Phase 1 NA
3.2. Does the use of your goods and/or services directly enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party? No Yes Yes
3.2a. Please provide details (see guidance) NA Jones Lang LaSalle helps develop comprehensive energy management programs that align with clients’ broader business strategy and provide measurable savings and results. Our holistic approach to energy management considers not just how facilities are built NA
3.3. Did you have emissions reduction initiatives that were active within the reporting year (this can include those in the planning and/or implementation phases) No Yes Yes
3.3a. Please identify the total number of projects at each stage of development, and for those in theimplementation stages, the estimated CO2e savings/Stage of development/3.3a. Number of projects/Total estimated annual CO2e savings in metric tonnes CO2e Under investigation//
3.3c. What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities?/Comment Dedicated budget for energy efficiency/Although we cannot attribute a dedicated budget amount to all energy efficiency initiatives, as a property manager that also advises other property managers on environmental best practice, we aim to lead by example.
5.1a. Please describe your risks driven by changes in regulation /ID/Risk driver/ Description/Potential impact/Timeframe/Direct/Indirect/Likelihood/Magnitude of impact RR1/General environmental regulations, including planning/General regulation that affects properties that we manage, or in which we invest, on behalf of clients: Jones Lang LaSalle’s operations are affected by federal, state and/or local environmental la
5.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk and (iii) the costs associated with these actions RR1. General environmental regulation (i) General regulation that affects properties that we manage, or in which we invest, on behalf of clients vary widely according to national boundaries. As these are largely dealt with locally, it is difficult to qua
5.1c. Please describe your risks that are driven by change in physical climate parameters/ID/Risk driver/Description/Potential impact/Timeframe/Direct/Indirect/Likelihood/Magnitude of impact RP1/Change in precipitation extremes and droughts/Our ability to conduct a global business may be adversely impacted by disruptions to the infrastructure that supports our businesses and the communities in which they are located. This may include disrupt
5.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA RP1. Change in precipitation extremes and droughts (i) Risks driven by change in our physical climate do not pose a significant, direct burden on our business. Physical impacts from climate change have not been identified as one of the top twelve issues f NA
5.1e. Please describe your risks that are driven by changes in other climate-related developments/ID/Risk driver/Description/Potential impact/Timeframe/Direct/Indirect/Likelihood/Magnitude of impact RO1/Reputation/The infrastructure disruptions we describe above may also disrupt our ability to manage real estate for clients or may adversely affect the value of real estate investments we make on behalf of clients. The buildings we manage for clients
6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Opportunities driven by changes in regulation; Opportunities driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA
6.1a. Please describe your opportunities that are driven by changes in regulation/ID/Opportunity driver/Description/Potential impact/Timeframe/Direct/Indirect/Likelihood/Magnitude of impact OR1/General environmental regulations, including planning/Energy Performance Certificates: The introduction of regulation that promotes transparency in the property market through disclosure of energy certificates presents an opportunity of increased dem
6.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity and (iii) the costs associated with these actions General comment to applicable to all opportunities: Jones Lang LaSalle has not quantified the potential financial implications of expanding our services to generate revenue as a result of changing regulatory environments. We offer a coordinated service de
6.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity and (iii) the costs associated with these actions OP1. Other physical climate drivers(i) Jones Lang LaSalle has not quantified the potential financial implications of its programmes to help clients identify and mitigate risks to their assets from climate change. We offer a coordinated service delivery th
6.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA OO1. Changing consumer behaviour (i) To meet growing demand for products and services due to changing consumer behaviour, we offer comprehensive Energy and Sustainability Services (ESS) incorporated within our five major Real Estate Service product catego NA
6.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
6.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA At this time, we do not see climate change-related physical changes to be an area of significant opportunity for our company. NA
6.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
7.1. Please provide your base year and base year emissions (Scopes 1 and 2)/7.1. Base year From Date:/To Date:/ Scope 1 Base year emissions (metric tonnes CO2e)/N39Scope 2 Base year emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) 2009-01-01/2009-12-31/5324.45/9780.38
7.2. Please give the name of the standard, protocol or methodology you have used to collect activity data and calculate Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions NA The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (Revised Edition) NA
7.3. Please give the source for the global warming potentials you have used Gas/Reference CH4/IPCC Second Assessment Report (SAR - 100 year)
7.4. Please give the emissions factors you have applied and their origin; alternatively, please attach an Excel spreadsheet with this data Fuel/Material/Energy/Emission Factor/Unit/Reference ///Please see attached excel spreadsheet EmissionsFactors.xls. Relevant factors are highlighted yellow.
8.1. Please select the boundary you are using for your Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas inventory NA Operational control NA Boundary used for Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas inventory during 2011-2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.2. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figures in metric tonnes CO2e 11294
8.3. Please provide your gross global Scope 2 emissions figures in metric tonnes CO2e 10563
8.4. Are there are any sources (e.g. facilities, specific GHGs, activities, geographies, etc.) of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions which are not included in your disclosure? NA No NA Proportion of Scope 1 emissions that are verified/assured for 2011 - 2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.4a Reporting Period From/To/Source/Scope/Explain why the source is excluded No Response
8.5 Reporting Period From/To/Please estimate the uncertainty of the total gross global Scope 1 and 2 emissions figures that you have supplied and specify the sources of uncertainty in your data gathering, handling and calculations/Scope 1 emissions No Response
8.6. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 1 emissions No third party verification or assurance Proportion of Scope 1 emissions that are verified/assured for 2011 - 2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.6a. Please indicate the proportion of your Scope 1 emissions that are verified/assured More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% NA More than 90% but less than or equal to 100%
8.6b Reporting Period From/To/Please provide further details of the verification/assurance undertaken, and attach the relevant statements: Type of verification or assurance/Attach the document No Response
0.1. Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. Jones Lang LaSalle is a financial and professional services firm specializing in real estate. The firm offers integrated services delivered by expert teams worldwide to clients seeking increased value by owning, occupying or investing in real estate. We h
0.2. Please state the start and end date of the year for which you are reporting data. 2012-01-01
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Rank 1 59 100 NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Description NA Description of the company's product.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
ceo:numberOfRatings 1 194 4026 The number of ratings of the CEO
ceo:pctApprove 0 90 100 Percent of ratings of the CEO that were approving
ceo:title NA The title of the company's CEO
employer:numberOfRatings 1 336 6549 The number of Glassdoor users who have rated this company as a place to work.
Glassdoor Employer Ratings 1 3.4 5 The Top Companies for Work-Life Balance list is based on employee feedback shared in company reviews on Glassdoor.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Report reference ISO Standards? NA No NA NA
Sector NA Real Estate NA NA
Country (HQ) NA United States of America NA NA
Global Reporting Initiative 2013
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Guidelines NA GRI - G3.1 NA This field indicates which version of the GRI Guidelines is used for the reporting. As of publication year 2009, GRI only includes reporting that makes use of the G3 Guidelines, which were released in October 2006.
Integrated No Yes Yes GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
Publication Year 2013 GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
Region NA Northern America NA Region the organization operates in.
Report Html Address NA http://www.joneslanglasalle.com/Pages/Sustainability-Report.aspx NA URL of the report location.
Report Pdf Address NA http://www.joneslanglasalle.com/Documents/Sustainability/JLL_Sustainability_Report.pdf NA Location of a PDF version of the report.
Report Title NA 2012 Sustainability Report NA Title of the report.
Sector NA Real Estate NA Industry sector.
Sector Supplements (Final) NA Construction & Real Estate NA This field indicates if the reporting organization has made use of one of the final Sector Supplements and which one. If ‘not used’ is indicated, it means that one of the final Sector Supplements is applicable, but has not been used. If ‘not applicable’ i
Size NA Large NA GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
include_continued_support_statement 0 1 1 NA
additional_questions 0 0 1 NA
cop_web_link NA http://www.unglobalcompact.org/COPs/detail/18523 NA NA
created_at NA 39722.8394 NA NA
differentiation NA active NA NA
ends_on NA 39416 NA NA
include_measurement 0 1 1 NA
meets_advanced_criteria 0 0 1 NA
method_shared NA all_access NA NA
references_anti_corruption 0 1 1 NA
references_environment 0 1 1 NA
references_human_rights 0 1 1 NA
references_labour 0 1 1 NA
starts_on NA 39082 NA NA
title NA Communication on Progress - Sustainable Value in a Changing World NA NA
updated_at NA 39722.8394 NA NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
include_measurement 0 1 1 Does your COP identify targets, define performance indicators and measure outcomes?
references_anti_corruption 0 1 1 Does your COP contain description of actions, and when relevant policies, related to anti-corruption?
references_environment 0 1 1 Does your COP contain description of actions, and when relevant policies, related to the environment?
references_human_rights 0 1 1 Does your COP contain description of actions, and when relevant policies, related to human rights?
references_labour 0 1 1 Does your COP contain description of actions, and when relevant policies, related to labour rights?
starts_on NA 01/01/2012 NA Start Date
differentiation NA active NA At what level is the declarer?
ends_on NA 01/01/2013 NA End Date
format NA sustainability_report NA How is your COP shared with stakeholders?
Women's Business Enterprise National Council (WBENC)
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Strategic Partners Yes Yes Strategic Partners comprise some of the world’s leading corporate citizens and provide essential leadership in support of the Forum’s mission. Strategic Partners are a key force in our activities and communities at the global, regional and industry levels. They help shape our initiatives, projects and task forces and give intellectual guidance through the participation of their most senior executives on steering boards and in advisory groups. Their considerable financial support and in-kind services – including the provision of dedicated staff to assist with our operations – allow the Forum to deliver its programmes and advance worldwide economic and social progress.

Flags

(Other Indicators - things that don’t affect ratings but that help identify or classify companies)

SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
You have put report(s) in your cart
Go to my cart
Ok