CSRHub is the world’s largest CSR (corporate social responsibility) and sustainability ratings and information database.

Exxon Mobil Corporation

Subscribe to see all available data

Exxon Mobil Corporation is an international oil and gas company as well as a refiner and marketer of petroleum products. Exxon also owns a chemical company. Company brands include Exxon, Mobil, and Esso. Exxon has refineries in Canada, the Netherlands, and the U.S. and sells its oil and gas products in Europe, Australia, Asia, the U.S., and the U.K.

Ticker: XOM ISIN: US30231G1022
Address: 5959 Las Colinas Boulevard , USA , Irving , TX , 75039 Website: Exxon Mobil Corporation
Phone #: 1-972-4441000 CSR Web Area: SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Basic Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Ratings

  Overall Community Employees Environment Governance
Exxon Mobil Corporation 51 43 50 56 51
Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber Products Mfg.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Oil and Gas Extraction
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Petroleum Refineries
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
All company average 55 55 56 58 52
USA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Percentile Rankings

Rankings are in percentile terms, compared to other companies in the same industry and country Overall Community Employees Environment Governance
Exxon Mobil Corporation 25% 9% 24% 41% 42%
Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber Products Mfg.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Oil and Gas Extraction
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Petroleum Refineries
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
USA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Ratings History

Only subscribers can interact with the graph.

More CSR Rating Details

  Community Employees
Community Dev & Philanthropy Product Human Rights & Supply Chain Compensation & Benefits Diversity & Labor Rights Training, Health & Safety
Exxon Mobil Corporation
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber Products Mfg.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Oil and Gas Extraction
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Petroleum Refineries
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
All company average 53 54 55 58 55 55
USA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Environment Governance
Energy & Climate Change Environmant Policy & Reporting Resource Management Board Leadership Ethics Transparency & Reporting
Exxon Mobil Corporation
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber Products Mfg.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Oil and Gas Extraction
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Petroleum Refineries
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
All company average 57 58 57 50 55 51
USA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Percentile rankings

Rankings are in percentile terms, compared to other companies in the same industry and country Community Employees
Community Dev & Philantrophy Product Human Rights & Supply Chain Compensation & Benefits Diversity & Labor Rights Training, Health & Safety
Exxon Mobil Corporation 16% 49% 2% 25% 8% 58%
Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber Products Mfg.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Oil and Gas Extraction
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Petroleum Refineries
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
USA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Environment Governance
Energy & Climate Change Environment Policy & Reporting Resource Management Board Leadership Ethics Transparency & Reporting
Exxon Mobil Corporation 47% 49% 34% 58% 22% 57%
Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber Products Mfg.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Oil and Gas Extraction
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Petroleum Refineries
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
USA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

3 Special Issues Affect This Company (see a list of issues here)

Military Contractor Fracking Involved Animal Test User
# of Sources 2 6 3
# of co. % of co. # of co. % of co. # of co. % of co.
Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber Products Mfg.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Oil and Gas Extraction
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Petroleum Refineries
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Overall database 756 8.1 58 0.6 115 1.2
USA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

CSRHub Has 99 Data Sources (56 Are Currently Active) for This Company

= sources impacting the current ratings
= sources not impacting the current ratings, but included in earlier ratings for this company
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Original Data Values

(unsubscribed users can see the list, subscribers can see the data details for most sources)

Data source name

Data source element name Minimum value Value provided by datasource Maximum value Data description
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Proxy resolution for the company http://www.asyousow.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/2013-exxon-reso.pdf# Web address for the resolution
Resolution Summary Shareholders request the Board of Directors to report to shareholders by October 30, 2013, and annually thereafter, using multiple quantitative indicators,the results of company procedures and practices, above and beyond regulatory requirements,to mi(…) Individual resolution summary page
As you sow 2014
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Proxy resolution for the company http://www.asyousow.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/exxonmobil2014carbonbubble.pdf#, http://www.asyousow.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/exxonmobil2014hydraulicfracturing.pdf# Web address for the resolution
Resolution Status Withdrawn Status of the company's multiple shareholder resolutions.
Resolution Summary Shareholders request Exxon Mobil prepare a report by September 2014, omitting proprietary information and prepared at r(…), Shareholders request the Board of Directors to report to shareholders using quantitative indicators by December 31, 2014, an(…) Individual resolution summary page
Boston College Center for Corporate Citizenship (BCCCC)
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Brand Value / Enterprise Value (%) -48.164682123 0.067 316.6056 NA
Brand Value 2012 5684.9478 NA
BSI 50 76.6171 88.4717 NA
Domicile UNITED STATES NA
Enterprise Value NA 96705.525 NA NA
Reviewed ? YES NA
Sector Energy NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Brand Value 2013 11.095 6348.2513 67875.2014 NA
BSI 50 76.6171 89.6275 NA
Domicile UNITED STATES NA
Sector Energy NA
Reviewed RY NA
Brand Rating 2013 BBB AA- AAA+ NA
Enterprise Value 2013 0 98171.1643 435750.9811
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Brand Value / Enterprise Value (%) 0.009 0.0726 1.07 NA
Brand Value 2014 10 8004.0362 87304 A brand strength is assessed by using our Brand Strength Index framework. This benchmarks the strength, risk and future potential of a brand relative to its competitors by assessing input measures, brand equity measures, and output performance across four
BSI 51.3 70.7866 94.2 NA
Domicile UNITED STATES NA
Enterprise Value 2014 66 101909.1145 526619 NA
Sector Energy NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Proxy filed Yes NA
Proxy voting decisions for the company http://www.calpers-governance.org/proxyvoting/proxy/ticker-results?ticker=XOM NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Proxy voting decisions for the company http://www.calpers-governance.org/proxyvoting/proxy/ticker-results?ticker=XOM# NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
0. Further Information NA NA NA NA
0.1. Introduction - Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. NA ExxonMobil is the world’s largest publicly traded international oil and gas company. We hold an industry-leading inventory of global oil and gas resources. We are the world’s largest refiner and marketer of petroleum products, and our chemical company ran NA NA
5.1e Identified climate change risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments? NA Yes NA NA
5.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA (i) ExxonMobil believes that our ability to consistently deliver strong returns to shareholders is a direct result of our ability to effectively manage risk. Risk cannot be eliminated, but it can be managed. (ii) ExxonMobil manages risk through a capab NA NA
5.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
5.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
5.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
6. Attachments NA NA NA NA
6. Further Information NA http://www.exxonmobil.com/Corporate/safety_climate_gcep-research.aspx http://www.exxonmobil.com/Corporate/Files/news_pub_Carbon_Capture_Storage_brochure.pdf http://www.exxonmobil.com/Corporate/Files/news_pub_algae_brochure.pdf NA NA
6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Opportunities driven by changes in regulation; Opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA NA
6.1a Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in regulation? NA Yes NA NA
6.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA (i) Technological, political, and regulatory risks have been inherent in the oil and gas industry since its earliest beginnings. The uncertainties associated with the physical and regulatory risks impedes assessment of potential financial implications. NA NA
6.1c Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in physical climate parameters? NA No NA NA
14. Attachments NA NA NA NA
6.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA NA NA NA
6.1e Identified opportunities that are driven by changes in other climate-related developments? NA Yes NA NA
6.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA (i) Meeting the dual challenge of supplying the world the energy it needs to support economic growth and raise living standards, while minimizing impact on the environment will require new technologies. (ii) To develop new technologies, ExxonMobil was NA NA
13. Attachments NA NA NA NA
11. Attachments NA NA NA NA
11. Further Information NA NA NA NA
11.1. Do you consider that the grid average factors used to report Scope 2 emissions in Question 8.3 reflect the contractual arrangements you have with electricity suppliers? NA Yes NA NA
11.1a. You may report a total contractual Scope 2 figure in response to this question. Please provide your total global contractual Scope 2 GHG emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 0 NA 17902000 NA
11.2. Has your organization retired any certificates, e.g. Renewable Energy Certificates, associated with zero or low carbon electricity within the reporting year or has this been done on your behalf? NA No NA NA
3.1e. Please explain (i) why not; and (ii) forecast how your emissions will change over the next five years NA NA NA NA
3.2. Does the use of your goods and/or services directly enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party? No Yes Yes NA
3.2a. Please provide details (see guidance) NA We do not collect emissions avoided by a third party due to the inability to accurately calculate these numbers. ExxonMobil believes producers, refiners, distributors, and end-users should each be responsible for managing and reporting the emissions gene NA NA
3.3c Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities. 0 2 12 NA
3.3c. What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities? NA Other, Internal price of carbon NA NA
5. Attachments NA NA NA NA
5. Further Information NA http://www.exxonmobil.com/Corporate/safety_climate.aspx http://www.exxonmobilsafety.com/ NA NA
5.1. Have you identified any climate change risks (current or future) that have potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Risks driven by changes in regulation; Risks driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA NA
5.1a Identified risks driven by changes in regulation? NA Yes NA NA
5.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA (i) Technological, political, and regulatory risks have been inherent in the oil and gas industry since its earliest beginnings. The uncertainties associated with the physical and regulatory risks impedes assessment of potential financial implications. NA NA
14. Further Information NA NA NA NA
1.1. Where is the highest level of direct responsibility for climate change within your company? No individual or committee with overall responsibility for climate change Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board NA
1.1a. Please identify the position of the individual or name of the committee with this responsibility NA The Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and the members of the Management Committee have responsibility for climate change matters. The Board's Public Issues and Contributions Committee is responsible for the oversight of safety, health, a NA NA
1.2. Do you provide incentives for the management of climate change issues, including the attainment of targets? No Yes Yes NA
13. Further Information NA Normalization factors facilitate a level of comparison over time among similar business operations within the company. We believe that measuring GHG intensity in this way (metric tons of CO2-e per unit production volume or throughput) is a more useful me NA NA
13.1. How do your absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year compare to the previous year? Increased Increased Decreased NA
13.1a (i) If absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) have increased, decreased or remained the same overall compared to the previous year, state direction of change NA Slightly Increased NA NA
13.1a (ii) If absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) have increased, decreased or remained the same overall compared to the previous year, state the reason for the direction of change NA Decrease: Mergers, Decrease: Change in output, Increase: Emissions reduction activities, Decrease: Other NA NA
13.1a (iii) If emissions have increased, decreased or remained the same overall, provide the emissions value (%) NA Decrease: , Increase: 14 , Emission value for which direction is not stated: NA NA
2012 Score 0 75 100 NA
2012 Performance Band E C A NA
2.3a. Please explain (i) the engagement process and (ii) actions you are advocating NA ExxonMobil scientists have undertaken climate change research and related policy analysis for over 30 years. Their work has resulted in publication of more than 45 papers in peer-reviewed literature. In addition, two of our scientists are among the very f NA NA
8.8. Are carbon dioxide emissions from the combustion of biologically sequestered carbon (i.e. carbon dioxide emissions from burning biomass/biofuels) relevant to your company? No No Yes NA
8.8a. Please provide the emissions in metric tonnes CO2e 0.01 NA 27263000 NA
Management 4. Attachments NA NA NA NA
Management 4. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? NA 4 NA NA
5.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA (i) ExxonMobil’s operations around the world include activities both onshore and offshore that can experience weather extremes and storms, large sea level variations and wave height, and temperature and precipitation extremes. Our facilities are already d NA NA
2. Attachments NA NA NA NA
2. Further Information NA http://www.exxonmobil.com/Corporate/energy_outlook.aspx NA NA
5.1c Identified climate change risks driven by change in physical climate parameters? NA Yes NA NA
2.1. Please select the option that best describes your risk management procedures with regard to climate change risks and opportunities NA Integrated into multi-disciplinary company wide risk management processes NA NA
2.1a. Please provide further details (see guidance) NA Each year, ExxonMobil takes a comprehensive look at long-term trends in energy demand, supply, emissions, and technology to guide long-term investment decisions. We publish the results annually in our Outlook for Energy. In our most recent Outlook, we se NA NA
2.2. Is climate change integrated into your business strategy? No Yes Yes NA
2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes (see guidance) NA Environmental performance (including GHG emissions) is assessed and recognized through the annual planning and budget process. During this process, key strategies and objectives are established for each business line for both the short and long term. Du NA NA
2.2b. Please explain why not NA NA NA NA
2.3. Do you engage with policy makers to encourage further action on mitigation and/or adaptation? No Yes Yes NA
3. Attachments NA NA NA NA
3. Further Information NA In 2011 we invested more than $440 million to improve energy efficiency, reduce flaring, and reduce GHG emissions. Question 3.3a Only our cogeneration projects are represented. These projects are pursued based on financial return, but also result in GHG NA NA
3.1. Did you have an emissions reduction target that was active (ongoing or reached completion) in the reporting year? No Intensity target Absolute and intensity targets NA
14.1. Do you participate in any emission trading schemes? No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next two years Yes Yes NA
14.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? No Yes Yes NA
6.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
6.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA We view potential changes to physical climate parameters as risks to be managed. NA NA
6.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
7. Attachments NA NA NA NA
7. Further Information NA Q7.4 - The Fuel/Material/Energy categories listed comprise over 95% of our energy sources. Our operations utilize the most accurate emission factors available to them beginning with the API GHG Compendium emission factors, then applying locally regulated NA NA
7.1. Please provide your base year and base year emissions (Scopes 1 and 2) NA NA NA NA
0.4. Currency selection Please select the currency in which you would like to submit your response. All financial information contained in the response should be in this currency. NA USD($) NA NA
1. Attachments NA NA NA NA
1. Further Information NA NA NA NA
8.7. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 2 emissions More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% NA More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% NA
11.1b. Explain the basis of the alternative figure (see guidance) NA NA
14.1b. What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? ExxonMobil's strategy is to manage compliance obligations of our regulated facilities through comprehensive measurement and reporting, ongoing assessment and implementation of cost effective energy efficiency improvements and ratable purchase and sale of NA
8.1. Please select the boundary you are using for your Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas inventory NA NA NA NA
8.2a. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 92 NA 231902967 NA
8.3a. Please provide your gross global Scope 2 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 293 NA 8071070 NA
8.4. Are there are any sources (e.g. facilities, specific GHGs, activities, geographies, etc.) of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions which are not included in your disclosure? NA No NA NA
8.6. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 1 emissions More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% NA More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
8.7. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 2 emissions Third party verification or assurance complete Proportion of Scope 2 emissions that are verified/assured for 2011-2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.7a. Please indicate the proportion of your Scope 2 emissions that are verified/assured More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% More than 90% but less than or equal to 100%
8.7b Reporting Period From/To/Please provide further details of the verification/assurance undertaken, and attach the relevant statements/Type of verification or assurance/Relevant standard/Attach the document No Response
8.8. Are carbon dioxide emissions from biologically sequestered carbon relevant to your organization? No
8.8a. Please provide the emissions in metric tonnes CO2 NA
8.8a. Please provide the emissions in metric tonnes CO2e 0.05 NA 13638000
9.1. Do you have Scope 1 emissions sources in more than one country? Yes
9.1a Reporting Period From/To/Please complete the table below: Country/Region/Scope 1 metric tonnes CO2e 1 Jan 2012/31 Dec 2012/Americas/65000000
9.2. Please indicate which other Scope 1 emissions breakdowns you are able to provide (tick all that apply) NA By business division; By GHG type NA
9.2a Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by business division: Business division/Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) 1 Jan 2012/31 Dec 2012/Upstream/65000000
9.2b Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by facility: Facility/Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) No Response
9.2c Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by GHG type: GHG type/Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) 1 Jan 2012/31 Dec 2012/CO2/126000000
9.2d Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by activity: Activity/Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) No Response
9.2e Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by legal structure: Legal structure/Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) No Response
0.3. Country list configuration China
0.4. Currency selection Please select the currency in which you would like to submit your response. All financial information contained in the response should be in this currency. USD($)
0.4. Please select the currency in which you would like to submit your response. USD($)
0.5. Please select if you wish to complete a shorter information request. NA
0.6. Modules NA As part of the Investor CDP information request, electric utilities, companies with electric utility activities or assets, companies in the automobile or auto component manufacture sectors and companies in the oil and gas industry should complete suppleme
1. Attachments NA NA NA
1. Further Information NA NA NA
1.1. Where is the highest level of direct responsibility for climate change within your company? No individual or committee with overall responsibility for climate change Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board
1.1a. Please identify the position of the individual or name of the committee with this responsibility NA The Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and the members of the Management Committee have responsibility for climate change matters. The Board's Public Issues and Contributions Committee is responsible for the oversight of safety, health, and NA
1.2. Do you provide incentives for the management of climate change issues, including the attainment of targets? No Yes Yes
1.2a. Who is entitled to benefit from these incentives? Other: Board Chairman, CEO, Management Committee, and all management, professional, and technical employees/Monetary reward/Environmental performance (including GHG emissions and energy efficiency) is assessed and recognized through the annual planning an
10.1. Do you have Scope 2 emissions sources in more than one country? Yes
10.1a Reporting Period: From/To/Please complete the table below: Country/Region/Scope 2 metric tonnes CO2e/Purchased and consumed electricity, heat, steam or cooling (MWh)/Purchased and consumed low carbon electricity, heat, steam or cooling (MWh) 1 Jan 2012/31 Dec 2012/Americas/10000000/10000000/0
10.2. Please indicate which other Scope 2 emissions breakdowns you are able to provide (tick all that apply) NA By business division NA
10.2a Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by business division: Business division/Scope 2 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) 1 Jan 2012/31 Dec 2012/Upstream/5000000
10.2b Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by facility: Facility/Scope 2 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) No Response
10.2c Reporting Period: From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by activity: Activity/Scope 2 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) No Response
10.2d Reporting Period: From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by legal structure: Legal structure/Scope 2 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) No Response
11. Attachments NA NA NA
11. Further Information NA NA NA
11.1. What percentage of your total operational spend in the reporting year was on energy? More than 0% but less than or equal to 5% More than 25% but less than or equal to 30% More than 95% but less than or equal to 100%
11.2. Please state how much fuel, electricity, heat, steam, and cooling in MWh your organization has purchased and consumed during the reporting year: Energy type/MWh Fuel/324000000;Electricity/49000000;Heat/0;Steam/31000000;Cooling/0
11.3. Please complete the table by breaking down the total "Fuel" figure entered above by fuel type: Fuels/MWh Refinery gas/
11.4. Please provide details of the electricity, heat, steam or cooling amounts that were accounted at a low carbon emission factor: Basis for applying a low carbon emission factor/MWh associated with low carbon electricity, heat, steam or cooling No purchases or generation of low carbon electricity, heat, steam or cooling/0
12. Attachments NA
12. Further Information Normalization factors facilitate a level of comparison over time among similar business operations within the company. We believe that measuring GHG intensity in this way (metric tons of CO2-e per unit production volume or throughput) is a more useful me
12.1. How do your absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year compare to the previous year? Decreased
12.1a Reason of change Emissions reduction activities, Divestment, Acquisitions, Mergers, Change in output, Change in methodology, Change in boundary, Change in physical operating conditions, Unidentified, Other
12.1a. Reason: Emissions value (percentage) Emissions reduction activities: 2/Divestment: 3/Acquisitions: 0/Mergers: 0/Change in output: 1/Change in methodology: 1/Change in boundary: 0/Change in physical operating conditions: 0/Unidentified: 0/Other: 2
12.2. Please describe your gross combined Scope 1 and 2 emissions for the reporting year in metric tonnes CO2e per revenue: Intensity figure/Metric numerator/% change from previous year/Direction of change from previous year/Reason for change 0.0003/metric tonnes CO2e/2/Decrease/Emissions decreased by 3% while revenue decreased by less than 1%. Revenue can vary significantly with the cyclic nature of the oil and gas industry. Emissions/Revenue is not a useful intensity measure for our industr
12.3. Please describe your gross combined Scope 1 and 2 emissions for the reporting year in metric tonnes CO2e per FTE: Intensity figure/Metric numerator/% change from previous year/Direction of change from previous year/Reason for change 1899/metric tonnes CO2e/4/Increase/Emissions decreased by 3% while headcount decreased by 6%. The oil and gas industry is a capital intensive industry rather than a labor intensive industry. Emissions/FTE is not a useful intensity measure for our industr
12.4. Please provide an additional intensity (normalized) metric that is appropriate to your business operations: Intensity figure/Metric numerator/% change from previous year/Direction of change from previous year/Reason for change 0.195/metric tonnes CO2e/4/Decrease/REFINING: Increased cogeneration utilization and energy efficiency projects and operational improvements, along with less intensive crude slate and product mix.
13.1. Do you participate in any emissions trading schemes? Yes
13.1b. What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? ExxonMobil's strategy is to manage compliance obligations of our regulated facilities through comprehensive measurement and reporting, ongoing assessment and implementation of cost effective energy efficiency improvements and ratable purchase and sale of
13.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? Yes
14. Attachments NA NA NA
14. Further Information NA NA NA
14.1. Do you participate in any emission trading schemes? No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next two years Yes Yes
14.1b. What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? ExxonMobil's strategy is to manage compliance obligations of our regulated facilities through comprehensive measurement and reporting, ongoing assessment and implementation of cost effective energy efficiency improvements and ratable purchase and sale of
14.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? No Yes Yes
14.2. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 3 emissions Third party verification or assurance underway but not yet complete - last years statement available
14.2a. Please indicate the proportion of your Scope 3 emissions that are verified/assured More than 0% but less than or equal to 20%
14.3. Are you able to compare your Scope 3 emissions for the reporting year with those for the previous year for any sources? Yes
14.4. Do you engage with any of the elements of your value chain on GHG emissions and climate change strategies? (Tick all that apply) Yes, our suppliers; Yes, our customers
14.4a. Please give details of methods of engagement, your strategy for prioritizing engagements and measures of success In our oil & gas operations, the vast majority of our emissions are not in our supply chain, and therefore we choose to focus our GHG reduction efforts on our own internal operations vs suppliers and customers. In our lubricants and chemical businesse
14.4d. Please explain why not and any plans you have to develop an engagement strategy in the future NA
2. Attachments NA NA NA
2. Further Information NA NA NA
2.1. Please select the option that best describes your risk management procedures with regard to climate change risks and opportunities NA Integrated into multi-disciplinary company wide risk management processes NA
2.1a. Please provide further details ExxonMobil is committed to conducting business in a manner that is compatible with the environmental and economic needs of the communities in which we operate, and that protects the safety, security, and health of our employees, those involved with our op
2.1a. Please provide further details (see guidance) NA ExxonMobil is committed to conducting business in a manner that is compatible with the environmental and economic needs of the communities in which we operate, and that protects the safety, security, and health of our employees, those involved with our op NA
2.2. Is climate change integrated into your business strategy? No Yes Yes
2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes Environmental performance (including GHG emissions) is assessed and recognized through the annual planning and budget process. During this process, key strategies and objectives are established for each business line. Results are regularly stewarded agai
2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes (see guidance) NA Environmental performance (including GHG emissions) is assessed and recognized through the annual planning and budget process. During this process, key strategies and objectives are established for each business line. Results are regularly stewarded agai NA
2.2b. Please explain why not NA NA NA
2.3. Do you engage in activities that could either directly or indirectly influence policy on climate change through any of the following? (tick all that apply) Yes
2.3. Do you engage with policy makers to encourage further action on mitigation and/or adaptation? No No Response Yes
2.3a. On what issues have you been engaging directly?: Focus of legislation/Corporate Position/Details of engagement/Proposed solution Other: Sound Climate Policy/Support/We engage with policymakers directly and through trade associations around the world to encourage sound policy solutions for addressing the risks of climate change. We also fund research organizations such as the MIT Jo
2.3a. Please explain (i) the engagement process and (ii) actions you are advocating NA We engage with policymakers directly and through trade associations around the world to encourage sound policy solutions for addressing the risks of climate change. We also fund research organizations such as the MIT Joint Program on Global Change to enha NA
2.3b. Are you on the Board of any trade associations or provide funding beyond membership? NA
2.3c. Please enter the details of those trade associations that are likely to take a position on climate change legislation/Trade association NA
2.3d. Do you publically disclose a list of all the research organizations that you fund? Yes
2.3e. Do you fund any research organizations to produce public work on climate change? Yes
2.3f. Please describe the work and how it aligns with your own strategy on climate change ExxonMobil promotes discussion on issues of direct relevance to the company. We contribute to a wide range of academic and policy organizations that research and promote dialogue on domestic and foreign policy issues. ExxonMobil annually reviews support
2.3g. Please provide details of the other engagement activities that you undertake NA
2.3h. What processes do you have in place to ensure that all of your direct and indirect activities that influence policy are consistent with your overall climate change strategy? Corporate wide Global Climate Change and Greenhouse Gas Issue Management Team with national/regional sub-teams reporting to the global team.
2.3i. Please explain why you do not engage with policy makers NA
3. Attachments NA NA NA
3. Further Information NA In 2012 we invested $330 million to improve energy efficiency, reduce flaring, and reduce GHG emissions. Question 3.3a - Only our cogeneration projects are represented. These projects are pursued based on financial return, but also result in significant NA
3.1. Did you have an emissions reduction target that was active (ongoing or reached completion) in the reporting year? No Intensity target Absolute and intensity targets
3.1a. Absolute target/ID/Scope/% of emissions in scope/% reduction from base year/Base year/Base year emissions (metric tonnes CO2e)/Target year/Comment No Response
3.1b. Intensity target/ID/Scope/% of emissions in scope/% reduction from base year/Metric/Base year/Normalized base year emissions/Target year/Comment EE/Scope 1+2/60/10/Other: Energy Efficiency Index/2002/80000000/2012/We achieved our target of improving energy efficiency across our worldwide refining and chemical operations by at least 10% between 2002 and 2012. We improved energy efficiency by 10% in
3.1c. What change in absolute emissions this intensity target reflects/ID/Direction of change anticipated in absolute Scope 1+2 emissions at target completion?/% change anticipated in absolute Scope 1+2 emissions EE/Decrease//No change//It is not possible to directly compare this intensity target with a corresponding reduction in absolute emissions since absolute emissions are also impacted by production volumes and the varying nature of our production, feedstocks
3.1d. Please provide details on your progress against this target made in the reporting year/ID/% complete (time)/% complete (emissions)/Comment EE/100/100/We achieved our stated objective of improving energy efficiency by at least 10% between 2002 and 2012 across our worldwide refining and chemical operations. We improved energy efficiency by 10% in refining and 12% in chemical manufacturing wor
3.1e. Please explain (i) why not; and (ii) forecast how your emissions will change over the next five years NA NA NA
3.2. Does the use of your goods and/or services directly enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party? No Yes Yes
3.2a. Please provide details (see guidance) NA We do not collect emissions avoided by a third party due to the inability to accurately and consistently calculate these numbers. ExxonMobil believes producers, refiners, distributors, and end-users should each be responsible for managing and reporting t NA
3.3. Did you have emissions reduction initiatives that were active within the reporting year (this can include those in the planning and/or implementation phases) No Yes Yes
3.3a. Please identify the total number of projects at each stage of development, and for those in theimplementation stages, the estimated CO2e savings/Stage of development/3.3a. Number of projects/Total estimated annual CO2e savings in metric tonnes CO2e Under investigation/14/2000000
3.3c Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities. 0 2 13 Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities.
3.3c. What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities? NA Other, Internal price of carbon NA
3.3c. What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities?/Comment Other/Adherence to internal standards and objectives. Our Operations Integrity Management System (OIMS) provides a systematic and disciplined approach to managing safety, security, health, environmental, and social risks. OIMS is consistent with the stan
4. Attachments NA
4. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? - Further Information NA
4.1. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? 5 The number of corporate annual reports and voluntary publications (complete and/or underway) made about the company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance
5. Attachments NA NA NA
5. Further Information NA NA NA
5.1. Have you identified any climate change risks (current or future) that have potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Risks driven by changes in regulation; Risks driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA
5.1a. Climate change risks driven by changes in regulation Yes
5.1a. Please describe your risks driven by changes in regulation /ID/Risk driver/ Description/Potential impact/Timeframe/Direct/Indirect/Likelihood/Magnitude of impact IA/International agreements/Rising greenhouse gas emissions pose potential risks to society and ecosystems that could be significant. Since most of these emissions are energy-related, any integrated approach to meeting the world's growing energy need ove
5.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk and (iii) the costs associated with these actions This response refers to all of the regulatory risks identified in 5.1a. (i) Technological, political, and regulatory risks have been inherent in the oil and gas industry since its earliest beginnings. The uncertainties associated with these regulatory ris
5.1c. Climate change risks driven by change in physical climate parameters Yes
5.1c. Please describe your risks that are driven by change in physical climate parameters/ID/Risk driver/Description/Potential impact/Timeframe/Direct/Indirect/Likelihood/Magnitude of impact /Uncertainty of physical risks/Current scientific understanding provides limited guidance on the likelihood, magnitude, and timeframe of physical risks such as sea level rise, extreme weather events, temperature extremes, and precipitation changes. While
5.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA (i) ExxonMobil’s operations around the world include activities both onshore and offshore that can experience weather extremes and storms, large sea level variations and wave height, and temperature and precipitation extremes. Our facilities are already d NA
5.1e. Please describe your risks that are driven by changes in other climate-related developments/ID/Risk driver/Description/Potential impact/Timeframe/Direct/Indirect/Likelihood/Magnitude of impact /Change in precipitation extremes and droughts/Local flood due to extreme precipitations./Reduction/disruption in production capacity/Current/Direct/Very unlikely/Low-medium
5.1e.Climate change risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments Yes
5.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA (i) ExxonMobil believes that our ability to consistently deliver strong returns to shareholders is a direct result of our ability to effectively manage risk. Risk cannot be eliminated, but it can be managed. (ii) ExxonMobil manages risk through a capab NA
5.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
5.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
5.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
6. Attachments NA NA NA
6. Further Information NA NA NA
6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Opportunities driven by changes in regulation; Opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA
6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? -Transparency Yes
6.1a Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in regulation? NA Yes NA
6.1a. Please describe your opportunities that are driven by changes in regulation/ID/Opportunity driver/Description/Potential impact/Timeframe/Direct/Indirect/Likelihood/Magnitude of impact REG/General environmental regulations, including planning/ExxonMobil’s strength in management systems provides us an ongoing opportunity to comply with emerging regulations in a manner that is more efficient and provides an economic advantage with respect
6.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity and (iii) the costs associated with these actions (i) Technological, political, and regulatory risks have been inherent in the oil and gas industry since its earliest beginnings. The uncertainties associated with the physical and regulatory risks impede assessment of potential financial implications.
6.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA
6.1e. Please describe the opportunities that are driven by changes in other climate-related developments Yes
6.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA (i) Meeting the dual challenge of supplying the world the energy it needs to support economic growth and raise living standards, while minimizing impact on the environment will require new technologies. (ii) To develop new technologies, ExxonMobil was NA
6.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
6.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA We view potential changes to physical climate parameters as risks to be managed, similar to multiple other risks we successfully manage. NA
6.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
7. Attachments NA NA NA
7. Further Information NA Q7.4 - The Fuel/Material/Energy categories listed comprise over 95% of our energy sources. Our operations utilize the most accurate emission factors available to them beginning with the API GHG Compendium emission factors, then applying locally regulated NA
7.1. Please provide your base year and base year emissions (Scopes 1 and 2)/7.1. Base year From Date:/To Date:/ Scope 1 Base year emissions (metric tonnes CO2e)/N39Scope 2 Base year emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) 2006-01-01/2006-12-31/145000000/13000000
7.2. Please give the name of the standard, protocol or methodology you have used to collect activity data and calculate Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions NA IPIECA's Petroleum Industry Guidelines for reporting GHG emissions, 2nd edition, 2011/American Petroleum Institute Compendium of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Methodologies for the Oil and Natural Gas Industry, 2009 NA
7.3. Please give the source for the global warming potentials you have used Gas/Reference CO2/IPCC Second Assessment Report (SAR - 100 year)
7.4. Please give the emissions factors you have applied and their origin; alternatively, please attach an Excel spreadsheet with this data Fuel/Material/Energy/Emission Factor/Unit/Reference Natural gas/130.07/lb CO2e per million BTU/API GHG Compendium, 2009
8.1. Please select the boundary you are using for your Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas inventory NA Equity share NA Boundary used for Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas inventory during 2011-2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.2. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e NA Gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e for 2011 - 2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.2. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figures in metric tonnes CO2e 132000000
8.3. Please provide your gross global Scope 2 emissions figures in metric tonnes CO2e NA
8.4. Are there are any sources (e.g. facilities, specific GHGs, activities, geographies, etc.) of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions which are not included in your disclosure? NA No NA Proportion of Scope 1 emissions that are verified/assured for 2011 - 2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.4a Reporting Period From/To/Source/Scope/Explain why the source is excluded No Response
8.5 Reporting Period From/To/Please estimate the uncertainty of the total gross global Scope 1 and 2 emissions figures that you have supplied and specify the sources of uncertainty in your data gathering, handling and calculations/Scope 1 emissions No Response
8.6. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 1 emissions Third party verification or assurance complete Proportion of Scope 1 emissions that are verified/assured for 2011 - 2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.6a. Please indicate the proportion of your Scope 1 emissions that are verified/assured More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% More than 90% but less than or equal to 100%
8.6b Reporting Period From/To/Please provide further details of the verification/assurance undertaken, and attach the relevant statements: Type of verification or assurance/Attach the document 1 Jan 2012/31 Dec 2012/Third party verification/assurance underway/European Union emissions trading system (EU ETS)/https://www.cdproject.net/sites/2013/36/6136/Investor CDP 2013/Shared Documents/Attachments/Investor-8.6b-C3-RelevantStatement/ExxonMobil C
2013 Performance Band E B A NA
2013 Score 0 80 100 NA
0. Attachments NA NA NA If you have not been presented with a sector module that you consider would be appropriate for your company to answer, please select the module below. If you wish to view the questions first, please see https://www.cdproject.net/en-US/Programmes/Pages/Mor
0. Further Information NA NA NA If you are in these sectors (according to the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS)), the corresponding sector modules will be marked as default options to your information request. If you want to query your classification, please email respond@c
0.1. Introduction - Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. NA ExxonMobil is the world’s largest publicly traded international oil and gas company. We hold an industry-leading inventory of global oil and gas resources. We are the world’s largest integrated refiner and manufacturer of lube basestocks, a leading market NA
0.1. Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. ExxonMobil is the world’s largest publicly traded international oil and gas company. We hold an industry-leading inventory of global oil and gas resources. We are the world’s largest integrated refiner and manufacturer of lube basestocks, a leading market
0.2. Please state the start and end date of the year for which you are reporting data. 2012-01-01
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
2014 Performance Band E C A 2014 Performance Band
2014 Score 100 76 1 2014 Score
CDLI leader No No Yes The Climate Disclosure Leadership Index: A Company must: (1)   Make its response public and submit via CDP’s Online Response System (2) Achieve a score within the top 10% of the total regional sample population
Comment Œ Ž Comment
CPLI leader No No Yes The Climate Performance Leadership Inde: A company must: (1)Make its response public and submit via CDP’s Online Response System (2) Attain a performance score greater than (3) Disclose gross global Scope 1 and Scope 2 figures (4) Score maximum performanc
Scope 1 emissions 134000000 All greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions that are directly from sources that are owned or controlled by the reporting entity.
Scope 2 emissions 14000000 All indirect greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the consumption of purchased electricity, heat or steam. Indirect GHG emissions are a consequence of the activities of the reporting entity, but occur at sources owned or controlled by another entity.
Target(s) reported NA Absolute/Intensive
Ticker XOM Ticker
Verification/ assurance 1  Audit and verification by a competent and independent organization that uses a standardized set of terms and methods.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Ask NA Adopt quantitative goals for reducing GHGs from products & operations. 2.Lead on technology re: energy sustainability. 3.Fracturing. 4. Disclose financial subsidies of all types (o)5. Disclose risks of oil sands. 6. Report on accident risk mitigation (o)7 NA Resolutions are part of broader investor efforts encouraging companies to address the full range of environmental, social and governance issues
Rating omitted filed withdrawn Shareholder resolutions filed by our investor network participants on sustainability-related issues that companies are facing
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Rank by Context-Based Score (1 to 100) 100 63 1 Climate counts rank
Sustainable N N Y If a company has a score of less than or equal to one (?1), it is considered “sustainable”, whereas a company with a score greater than one (>1) is considered “unsustainable”
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Disclosure (Percent of Max 23 points) 0 35 100 NA
Grand Total (Percent of Max 69 points) 0 46 100 NA
Policies (Percent of Max 18 points) 0 72 100 NA
CR’s 100 Best Corporate Citizens 2013
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Rank 1 50 100 NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Rank 1 99 100 NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Reported Scope 3 Total (tCO2e) 670000000 - 0 Indicated the total reported Scope 3 (all other indirect emissions) of the company in metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent (tCO2e) as defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol. Where no Scope 3 emissions are reported, this is recorded as "No Data"
Scope 1+2 Intensity 11162.43 329.85 0.3 Intensity is calculated by adding together a company's Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions and dividing by its turnover.
Global 800 Carbon Rank 800 121 1 Carbon Ranking of 800 international companies. Ranking is determined by EIO Methodology. See Source Info sheet for comments on it
No. of Scope 3 Categories Reported 1 - 15 This column indicates the number of Scope 3 Categories reported. Once placed into one of the four Disclosure Categories, companies are ranked by the number of Scope 3 categories disclosed.
Reported Scope 1+2 Total (tCO2e) 282000000 143000000 843 The total reported Scope 1 (all direct emissions) and Scope 2 (indirect electricity emissions) of the company in metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent (tCO2e) as defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol
Accepted or Inferred Scope 3 Intensity 8547.13 6319.81 64.51 Unless the company reports all 15 Scope 3 categories as defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Standard, an inferred figure based on the highest reported intensity for that sector, across the Global ET Universe, is shown
Category No Public Data Green Public, Complete, and Verified data Companies are placed into one of four data or 'disclosure' categories: 1) Public, Complete, and Verified data; 2) Public, Complete, and Unverified data; 3) Public, Incomplete, Verified or Unverified data; 4) No Public Data
Combined Scope 1+2+3 Intensity 12161.68 3489.76 34.24 Combined Scope 1+2_3 Intensity is calculated by adding together a company's Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions at 100% (disclosed or inferred) + 50% of Scope 3 emissions (disclosed or inferred).
Market Value ($Million) 1667.87 394611 358143.1 A company's market value, or market capitalism (number of shares times x share price). This value was taken on 23.08.2011
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Sum of Biogenic CO2 emissions 2.9 NA 23623772.5 Total biogenic CO2 emissions.
Sum of CO2 emissions (non-biogenic) 0.3 93542.3 53858607.2 Total non-biogenic CO2 emissions
Sum of Gases with No Listed GWP (metric tons) 0.3397 NA 1036.4
Sum of HFC emissions 2558.79 NA 19215.8
Sum of HFE emissions NA NA
Sum of Methane (CH4) emissions 0.21 20485.71 2491216.14 Total methane emissions
Sum of NF3 emissions 5332 NA 21231.68
Sum of Nitrous Oxide (N2O) emissions 0.31 224.75 10675387.54
Sum of PFC emissions 33930.1 NA 1221318.27
Sum of SF6 emissions 4254.2 NA 153581.4
Total reported direct emissions 30.03 114252.76 54200390.452 Total emissions of CO2 and other gases in metric tons.
Industry Description NA NA Description of the type of industry the facility serves.
Is Some CO2 captured on-site and therefore not emitted? N NA Y Indicates if all CO2 is emitted or if some is sequestered.
Number of reporting facilities 1 3 50 Number of facilities reported to the EPA.
Percentage of facilities that emit pollutants 2 66.6667 100 Percent of reporting facilities that emit pollutants other than CO2.
Percentage of facilities that employ continuous emissions monitoring 6 NA 100
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
ceo:numberOfRatings 1 165 4026 The number of ratings of the CEO
ceo:pctApprove 0 90 100 Percent of ratings of the CEO that were approving
ceo:title NA The title of the company's CEO
employer:numberOfRatings 1 302 6549 The number of Glassdoor users who have rated this company as a place to work.
Glassdoor Employer Ratings 1 3.4 5 The Top Companies for Work-Life Balance list is based on employee feedback shared in company reviews on Glassdoor.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Executive Diversity 0 0.12 0.41 Percentage of officers and directors that are female.
Percentage of Profit 0 0.006 1.086 Percentage of profit donated.
Rank 500 492 1 NA
Toxicity produced 773771631 0 0 In pounds.
Toxicity released 113515588 0 0 In pounds.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Date Added To Sr List NA 41451.1667 NA Date added to the GRI list.
Guidelines NA GRI - G3.1 NA This field indicates which version of the GRI Guidelines is used for the reporting. As of publication year 2009, GRI only includes reporting that makes use of the G3 Guidelines, which were released in October 2006.
Integrated No No Yes GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
Publication Year 2013 GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
Region NA Northern America NA Region the organization operates in.
Report Html Address NA http://www.exxonmobil.com/Corporate/community_ccr.aspx NA URL of the report location.
Report Pdf Address NA http://www.exxonmobil.com/Corporate/Files/news_pub_ccr2012.pdf NA Location of a PDF version of the report.
Report Title NA 2012 Corporate Citizenship Report NA Title of the report.
Sector NA Energy NA Industry sector.
Sector Supplements (Final) NA Not Used NA This field indicates if the reporting organization has made use of one of the final Sector Supplements and which one. If ‘not used’ is indicated, it means that one of the final Sector Supplements is applicable, but has not been used. If ‘not applicable’ i
Size NA MNE NA GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Political Contribution Yes No No Gas companies are lobbying Pennsylvanian lawmakers as Pennsylvania sits on top of the Marcellus Shale, one of the world’s largest deposits of natural gas. MarcellusMoney tracks donations made to political leaders, as well as list those companies.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Disclosure 0 66.4 100 Environmental disclosure was included as a stand-alone score to assess each company’s transparency with regard to its environmental performance. Specifically, this score evaluates the breadth and quality of company environmen
Green Score 21.4 47.1 82.9 NA
Envtl. Mgmt. 21.3 41.8 91.9 Based on an analysis of companies tracked in Sustainalytics’ Global Platform, the Environmental Management Score is an assessment of how a company manages its environmental performance through policies, programs, targets, certifications, and the like. To
Envtl. Impact 0 48.2 89 Based on data compiled by Trucost, this is a comprehensive, quantitative, and standardized measurement of the overall environmental impact of a company’s global operations. More than 700 metrics—including emissions of nine key greenhouse gases, water use,
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Carbon Productivity 0.003 0.497 0.97 GHG Productivity defined as Revenue ($US) / Total Greenhouse gas (GHG) Emissions (CO2e).
Energy Productivity 0.021 0.289 0.971 Energy Productivity defined as Revenue ($US) / Total Energy Consumption (GJ).
Newsweek Green Score 0.014 0.469 0.851 This score is derived from the following component scores: an Energy Productivity,Carbon Productivity, Water Productivity, Waste Productivity, Reputation, Pay Link, Sustainability Themed Committee, Audit ; weighted at 45 percent, 45 percent, and 10 percen
Pay Link No Yes Yes A mechanism to link the remuneration of any member of a company's senior executive team with the achievement of environmental performance targets.
Rank 500 103 1
Reputation 0.005 0.035 1.0 The Reputation score is made up of two components: (1) The RepRisk Index, which is a quantitative measure that captures criticism and quantifies a company exposure to ESG risks. (2) The second component is based on the number of environmental issues that
Sustainability Themed Committee No Yes Yes The existence of a committee at the Board of Directors level whose mandate is related to the sustainability of the company, including but not limited to environmental matters.
Waste Productivity 0.014 0.405 0.97 Waste Productivity is defined as Revenue ($US) / [Total waste generated (metric tonnes) – waste recycled/reused (metric tonnes)].
Water Productivity 0.028 0.557 0.992 Water Productivity is defined as Revenue ($US) / Total water use (m3).
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Envtl. Mgmt. 28.6 41.8 91.9 Based on an analysis of companies tracked in Sustainalytics’ Global Platform, the Environmental Management Score is an assessment of how a company manages its environmental performance through policies, programs, targets, certifications, and the like. To
Green Score 0 47.1 100 NA
Rank 500 440 1 NA
Disclosure 0 66.4 100 Environmental disclosure was included as a stand-alone score to assess each company’s transparency with regard to its environmental performance. Specifically, this score evaluates the breadth and quality of company environmen
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Carbon Productivity 0.015 0.497 0.963 GHG Productivity defined as Revenue ($US) / Total Greenhouse gas (GHG) Emissions (CO2e).
Energy Productivity 0.007 0.289 0.957 Energy Productivity defined as Revenue ($US) / Total Energy Consumption (GJ).
Newsweek Green Score 0.0 0.469 0.843 This score is derived from the following component scores: an Energy Productivity,Carbon Productivity, Water Productivity, Waste Productivity, Reputation, Pay Link, Sustainability Themed Committee, Audit ; weighted at 45 percent, 45 percent, and 10 percen
Pay Link No Yes Yes A mechanism to link the remuneration of any member of a company's senior executive team with the achievement of environmental performance targets.
Rank 500 180 1
Reputation 0.005 0.035 1 The Reputation score is made up of two components: (1) The RepRisk Index, which is a quantitative measure that captures criticism and quantifies a company exposure to ESG risks. (2) The second component is based on the number of environmental issues that
Sustainability Themed Committee No Yes Yes The existence of a committee at the Board of Directors level whose mandate is related to the sustainability of the company, including but not limited to environmental matters.
Waste Productivity 0.014 0.405 0.97 Waste Productivity is defined as Revenue ($US) / [Total waste generated (metric tonnes) – waste recycled/reused (metric tonnes)].
Water Productivity 0.012 0.557 0.992 Water Productivity is defined as Revenue ($US) / Total water use (m3).
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Corporate Governance 3 3 0 The scores for each ESG scope issue ranges from 0-3. The scoring refers to the number of times the company was criticized in relation to that scope issue: 0 = little or no exposure in the past 4 years; 1 = 5 direct relations in the past 4 years; 2 = 10 direct relations in the past 4 years; 3 = 20 direct relations in the past 4 years.
Current RRI 86 37 0 The RepRisk Index (RRI) is a quantitative risk measure that captures criticism and quantifies a company's exposure to controversial environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues. It does not measure a company's overall reputation, but rather is an indicator of their reputational risk.The Current RRI value indicates the current level of criticism about a company.
Employee Relations 3 3 0 The scores for each ESG scope issue ranges from 0-3. The scoring refers to the number of times the company was criticized in relation to that scope issue: 0 = little or no exposure in the past 4 years; 1 = 5 direct relations in the past 4 years; 2 = 10 direct relations in the past 4 years; 3 = 20 direct relations in the past 4 years.
Environmental FootPrint 3 3 0 The scores for each ESG scope issue ranges from 0-3. The scoring refers to the number of times the company was criticized in relation to that scope issue: 0 = little or no exposure in the past 4 years; 1 = 5 direct relations in the past 4 years; 2 = 10 direct relations in the past 4 years; 3 = 20 direct relations in the past 4 years.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Rank 400 235 1 REPORTWATCH RATING
Report Rating D B A REPORTWATCH RATING
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
RQ 64.38 The Annual RQ is an assessment tool that captures perceptions of corporate reputations across industries, among multiple audiences, and is adaptable to countries outside the United States, grouped into six dimensions of reputation: Products & Services, Fi
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Value of USG Contracts (in millions) 990 4.9 1 Value of Iranian contracts.
Withdrawn w Was the association with Iran withdrawn?
Nationality USA Country the company is in.
On the list Yes Yes Is the company on the list.
Women's Business Enterprise National Council (WBENC)
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Weighted score 1.2 4.7 5.9

Flags

(Other Indicators - things that don’t affect ratings but that help identify or classify companies)

SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
You have put report(s) in your cart
Go to my cart
Ok