CSRHub is the world’s largest CSR (corporate social responsibility) and sustainability ratings and information database.

Exelon Corporation is an electric services producer and provider. Exelon's family of companies includes energy generation, power marketing, transmission, and energy delivery. The Company has operations in the Midwest and Mid-Atlantic United States. Exelon delivers electricity to approximately 5.4 million customers in northern Illinois via ComEd and in southeastern Pennsylvania via PECO, as well as natural gas to 486,000 customers in the Philadelphia area via PECO. Exelon is headquartered in Chicago.

Ticker: EXC ISIN: US30161N1019
Address: 10 South Dearborn Street 48th Floor P.O. Box 805398 , USA , Chicago , IL , 60680-5398 Website: Exelon Corporation
Phone #: 1-312-3947398 CSR Web Area: SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Basic Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Ratings

  Overall Community Employees Environment Governance
Exelon Corporation 59 50 61 65 58
Electric & Gas Utilities
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
All company average 55 55 56 58 52
USA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Percentile Rankings

Rankings are in percentile terms, compared to other companies in the same industry and country Overall Community Employees Environment Governance
Exelon Corporation 70% 26% 66% 73% 68%
Electric & Gas Utilities
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
USA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Ratings History

Only subscribers can interact with the graph.

More CSR Rating Details

  Community Employees
Community Dev & Philanthropy Product Human Rights & Supply Chain Compensation & Benefits Diversity & Labor Rights Training, Health & Safety
Exelon Corporation
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Electric & Gas Utilities
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
All company average 53 54 55 58 55 55
USA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Environment Governance
Energy & Climate Change Environmant Policy & Reporting Resource Management Board Leadership Ethics Transparency & Reporting
Exelon Corporation
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Electric & Gas Utilities
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
All company average 57 58 57 50 55 51
USA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Percentile rankings

Rankings are in percentile terms, compared to other companies in the same industry and country Community Employees
Community Dev & Philantrophy Product Human Rights & Supply Chain Compensation & Benefits Diversity & Labor Rights Training, Health & Safety
Exelon Corporation 38% 26% 32% 72% 51% 68%
Electric & Gas Utilities
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
USA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Environment Governance
Energy & Climate Change Environment Policy & Reporting Resource Management Board Leadership Ethics Transparency & Reporting
Exelon Corporation 79% 77% 59% 72% 54% 82%
Electric & Gas Utilities
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
USA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

3 Special Issues Affect This Company (see a list of issues here)

Nuclear Power Involved Military Contractor Gay & Lesbian Sensitive
# of Sources 2 4 1
# of co. % of co. # of co. % of co. # of co. % of co.
Electric & Gas Utilities
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Overall database 20 0.2 756 8.1 266 2.8
USA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

CSRHub Has 77 Data Sources (45 Are Currently Active) for This Company

= sources impacting the current ratings
= sources not impacting the current ratings, but included in earlier ratings for this company
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Original Data Values

(unsubscribed users can see the list, subscribers can see the data details for most sources)

Data source name

Data source element name Minimum value Value provided by datasource Maximum value Data description
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Brand Finance 2011-12
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Brand Value / Enterprise Value (%) -48.164682123 0.0629 316.6056 NA
Brand Value 2012 865.876 NA
BSI 50 65.4764 88.4717 NA
Domicile UNITED STATES NA
Enterprise Value NA 13664.78 NA NA
Reviewed ? No response NA
Sector Utilities NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
BSI 51.3 73.6667 94.2 NA
Domicile UNITED STATES NA
Sector Utilities NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Proxy filed No NA
Proxy voting decisions for the company NA NA
CalPERS Proxy Voting 2014
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Proxy voting decisions for the company NA NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
0. Further Information NA NA NA NA
0.1. Introduction - Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. NA In 2011, Exelon Corporation was already one of the largest integrated energy companies engaged in electric power production in the Mid-West, Northeast, Mid- Atlantic and Texas, with retail distribution of electricity in the Chicago and Philadelphia areas, NA NA
5.1e Identified climate change risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments? NA Yes NA NA
5.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA 1.i. Consumer behaviour or regulatory requirements for collective reduction in energy use have the potential to reduce the demand for electricity, thereby impacting our overall financial performance. 1.ii. Exelon has responded by establishing green energ NA NA
5.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
5.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
5.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
6. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/13/6113/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/6.ClimateChangeOpportunities/Exelon_Smart_Meter.pdf NA NA
6. Further Information NA Additional information about Exelon's action in relation to fleet vehicles: As the operator of several large fleets, Exelon and its subsidiaries have converted all on-site fuel stations for its diesel vehicles to dispense biodiesel, and over 240 hybrids a NA NA
6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Opportunities driven by changes in regulation; Opportunities driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA NA
6.1a Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in regulation? NA Yes NA NA
6.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA 1.i.Exelon’s opportunity for financial growth from carbon offset trading is limited as the US market has yet to develop. Exelon has the rights to the Decin Bynov District Heating Plant projects carbon offsets, totalling 4235 tonnes in 2011. Exelon also NA NA
6.1c Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in physical climate parameters? NA Yes NA NA
14. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/13/6113/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/14.EmissionsTrading/2012-02-08 2011 CO2 data from Decin czech Republic Project.pdf NA NA
6.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA 1.i.In 2011, Average wholesale electricity prices were just over $54 per MWh (PJM West market area). Should increases in precipitation cause river flows to increase, there could be the potential for increased hydroelectric generation. For example, a hydr NA NA
6.1e Identified opportunities that are driven by changes in other climate-related developments? NA Yes NA NA
6.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA 1.i.All of Exelon’s major new program and capital investment decisions include a review of how they support Exelon 2020 and the goal to take a combination of actions that will reduce, offset or displace more than 15 million metric tons of GHG emissions an NA NA
13. Attachments NA NA NA NA
11. Attachments NA NA NA NA
11. Further Information NA For all electricity supplied to Exelon facilities, including auxiliary power for generating stations, Exelon utilizes the US EPA eGRID electricity grid emission rates for the regional transmission areas where the facilities that utilize electricity (Scope NA NA
11.1. Do you consider that the grid average factors used to report Scope 2 emissions in Question 8.3 reflect the contractual arrangements you have with electricity suppliers? NA Yes NA NA
11.1a. You may report a total contractual Scope 2 figure in response to this question. Please provide your total global contractual Scope 2 GHG emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 0 NA 17902000 NA
11.2. Has your organization retired any certificates, e.g. Renewable Energy Certificates, associated with zero or low carbon electricity within the reporting year or has this been done on your behalf? NA Yes NA NA
3.1e. Please explain (i) why not; and (ii) forecast how your emissions will change over the next five years NA NA NA NA
3.2. Does the use of your goods and/or services directly enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party? No Yes Yes NA
3.2a. Please provide details (see guidance) NA i. How the emissions are avoided: As a power producer, marketer and distributor, Exelon’s electricity and related services impact a wide variety of private consumers, businesses, manufacturers and government agencies. Everything that we do to reduce GHG NA NA
3.3c Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities. 0 12 12 NA
3.3c. What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities? NA Compliance with regulatory requirements/standards, Dedicated budget for low carbon product R&D, Partnering with governments on technology development, Compliance with regulatory requirements/standards, Dedicated budget for low carbon product R&D, Employee NA NA
5. Attachments NA NA NA NA
5. Further Information NA Additional details on impacts to insurance companies in relation to climate change disclosure are as follows: A 2009 directive to insurance companies from the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) would have required all insurance compan NA NA
5.1. Have you identified any climate change risks (current or future) that have potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Risks driven by changes in regulation; Risks driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA NA
5.1a Identified risks driven by changes in regulation? NA NA NA NA
5.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA 1, 2, 3, 4. i. This uncertainty in US regulatory developments challenges leaders trying to appropriately position their companies for future success. GHG regulations affecting new and existing power plants could impact the fuel and generation technology m NA NA
14. Further Information NA Exelon also supports the development of the Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD) pilot project in the Cordillera Azul National Park project in Peru in coordination with The Field Museum in Chicago, IL. The program is still w NA NA
1.1. Where is the highest level of direct responsibility for climate change within your company? No individual or committee with overall responsibility for climate change Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board NA
1.1a. Please identify the position of the individual or name of the committee with this responsibility NA John Rowe, Exelon’s CEO, Director and Chief Environmental Officer, was directly engaged in climate change issues at the Board of Directors level. Mr. Rowe directly led the creation of the Exelon 2020 comprehensive business and environment strategy for a NA NA
1.2. Do you provide incentives for the management of climate change issues, including the attainment of targets? No Yes Yes NA
13. Further Information NA NA NA NA
13.1. How do your absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year compare to the previous year? Increased Decreased Decreased NA
13.1a (i) If absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) have increased, decreased or remained the same overall compared to the previous year, state direction of change NA Significant Decrease NA NA
13.1a (ii) If absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) have increased, decreased or remained the same overall compared to the previous year, state the reason for the direction of change NA NA NA NA
13.1a (iii) If emissions have increased, decreased or remained the same overall, provide the emissions value (%) NA Decrease: , Increase: 2.5 , Emission value for which direction is not stated: NA NA
2012 Score 0 94 100 NA
2012 Performance Band E A A NA
2.3a. Please explain (i) the engagement process and (ii) actions you are advocating NA i. Engagement Processes Method of engagement: Exelon advocates for sound policies and competitive markets that support the advancement of clean affordable and reliable energy at the local, state, regional and federal levels to enable our industry—and the NA NA
8.8. Are carbon dioxide emissions from the combustion of biologically sequestered carbon (i.e. carbon dioxide emissions from burning biomass/biofuels) relevant to your company? No Yes Yes NA
8.8a. Please provide the emissions in metric tonnes CO2e 0.01 176237 27263000 NA
Management 4. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/13/6113/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/4.Communication/spch_Rowe_AEI2011.pdf NA NA
Management 4. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? NA 17 NA NA
5.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA 1, 2. i. Variations in precipitation, severe weather or other natural disasters could be destructive, which could result in increased costs, including supply chain costs. An extreme weather event within Exelon’s service areas can also directly affect its NA NA
2. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/13/6113/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/2.Strategy/dwnld_politicalcontributions_2011_janjune.pdf NA NA
2. Further Information NA The merger with Constellation created the largest competitive integrated energy provider in the United States (242 TWh of expected output and 164 TWh of load, including approximately 100,000 business and public sector customers and approximately 1 million NA NA
5.1c Identified climate change risks driven by change in physical climate parameters? NA Yes NA NA
2.1. Please select the option that best describes your risk management procedures with regard to climate change risks and opportunities NA Integrated into multi-disciplinary company wide risk management processes NA NA
2.1a. Please provide further details (see guidance) NA Exelon has an established Risk Management Policy (RK-AC-1) that requires Exelon and its subsidiaries protect shareholder value by maintaining a comprehensive risk management program that identifies, measures, prioritizes, manages and communicates signific NA NA
2.2. Is climate change integrated into your business strategy? No Yes Yes NA
2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes (see guidance) NA i. Our business strategy was influenced by our internal risk assessment process and our external involvement with our stakeholders. Exelon’s executive team came to recognize evidence of global climate change as compelling and that the electric industry NA NA
2.2b. Please explain why not NA NA NA NA
2.3. Do you engage with policy makers to encourage further action on mitigation and/or adaptation? No Yes Yes NA
3. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/13/6113/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/3.TargetsandInitiatives/Exelon_Smart_Meter.pdf NA NA
3. Further Information NA Additional information relating to our customer abatement and nuclear displacement accounting protocols is as follows:With respect to customer abatement from ComEd Smart Ideas and PECO Smart Ideas, and in support of the each of those company’s Energy Effi NA NA
3.1. Did you have an emissions reduction target that was active (ongoing or reached completion) in the reporting year? No Absolute target Absolute and intensity targets NA
14.1. Do you participate in any emission trading schemes? No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next two years Yes Yes NA
14.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? No Yes Yes NA
6.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
6.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
6.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
7. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/13/6113/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/7.EmissionsMethodology/Exelon Emission Factor Summary.xls NA NA
7. Further Information NA NA NA NA
7.1. Please provide your base year and base year emissions (Scopes 1 and 2) NA NA NA NA
0.4. Currency selection Please select the currency in which you would like to submit your response. All financial information contained in the response should be in this currency. NA USD($) NA NA
1. Attachments NA NA NA NA
1. Further Information NA Individual performance reviews for employees are conducted semi-annually. For those who have responsibilities linked to environmental performance and climate initiatives, their annual performance rating takes into account their performance results and th NA NA
8.7. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 2 emissions More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% NA More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% NA
11.1b. Explain the basis of the alternative figure (see guidance) NA NA
14.1b. What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? Exelon’s required participation is associated with applicable facilities we own and operate in RGGI states (currently only our Medway Peaking plant). Exelon purchased what we estimated to be half of our commitment at the beginning of the compliance perio NA
8.1. Please select the boundary you are using for your Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas inventory NA NA NA NA
8.2a. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 92 NA 231902967 NA
8.3a. Please provide your gross global Scope 2 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 293 NA 8071070 NA
8.4. Are there are any sources (e.g. facilities, specific GHGs, activities, geographies, etc.) of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions which are not included in your disclosure? NA Yes NA NA
8.6. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 1 emissions More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% NA More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
8.7. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 2 emissions Third party verification or assurance complete Proportion of Scope 2 emissions that are verified/assured for 2011-2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.7a. Please indicate the proportion of your Scope 2 emissions that are verified/assured More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% More than 90% but less than or equal to 100%
8.7b Reporting Period From/To/Please provide further details of the verification/assurance undertaken, and attach the relevant statements/Type of verification or assurance/Relevant standard/Attach the document No Response
8.8. Are carbon dioxide emissions from biologically sequestered carbon relevant to your organization? Yes
8.8a. Please provide the emissions in metric tonnes CO2 562623
8.8a. Please provide the emissions in metric tonnes CO2e 0.05 562623 13638000
9.1. Do you have Scope 1 emissions sources in more than one country? Yes
9.1a Reporting Period From/To/Please complete the table below: Country/Region/Scope 1 metric tonnes CO2e 1 Jan 2012/31 Dec 2012/Canada/100515
9.2. Please indicate which other Scope 1 emissions breakdowns you are able to provide (tick all that apply) NA By business division; By GHG type; By activity NA
9.2a Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by business division: Business division/Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) 1 Jan 2012/31 Dec 2012/Exelon Generation/25475584
9.2b Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by facility: Facility/Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) No Response
9.2c Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by GHG type: GHG type/Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) 1 Jan 2012/31 Dec 2012/CO2/25375783
9.2d Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by activity: Activity/Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) 1 Jan 2012/31 Dec 2012/Stationary Combustion – Electric Generation/25279454
9.2e Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by legal structure: Legal structure/Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) No Response
0.3. Country list configuration United States of America
0.4. Currency selection Please select the currency in which you would like to submit your response. All financial information contained in the response should be in this currency. USD($)
0.4. Please select the currency in which you would like to submit your response. USD($)
0.5. Please select if you wish to complete a shorter information request. NA
0.6. Modules Oil & Gas As part of the Investor CDP information request, electric utilities, companies with electric utility activities or assets, companies in the automobile or auto component manufacture sectors and companies in the oil and gas industry should complete suppleme
1. Attachments NA NA NA
1. Further Information NA NA NA
1.1. Where is the highest level of direct responsibility for climate change within your company? No individual or committee with overall responsibility for climate change Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board
1.1a. Please identify the position of the individual or name of the committee with this responsibility NA The Exelon Board of Director's Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for overseeing the management of environmental matters - including climate change - and annually reviewed the company’s performance on implementing and achieving its Exelon 2020 NA
1.2. Do you provide incentives for the management of climate change issues, including the attainment of targets? No Yes Yes
1.2a. Who is entitled to benefit from these incentives? Corporate executive team/Monetary reward/Meeting emissions reduction targets. Exelon utilizes a corporate scorecard that includes a specific goal for reducing GHG emissions. For 2012, the goal was to limit Exelon’s direct and indirect CO2e emissions to l
10.1. Do you have Scope 2 emissions sources in more than one country? Yes
10.1a Reporting Period: From/To/Please complete the table below: Country/Region/Scope 2 metric tonnes CO2e/Purchased and consumed electricity, heat, steam or cooling (MWh)/Purchased and consumed low carbon electricity, heat, steam or cooling (MWh) 1 Jan 2012/31 Dec 2012/Canada/2.25/2.35/0
10.2. Please indicate which other Scope 2 emissions breakdowns you are able to provide (tick all that apply) NA By business division; By activity NA
10.2a Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by business division: Business division/Scope 2 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) 1 Jan 2012/31 Dec 2012/Exelon Generation/287983
10.2b Reporting Period From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by facility: Facility/Scope 2 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) No Response
10.2c Reporting Period: From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by activity: Activity/Scope 2 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) 1 Jan 2012/31 Dec 2012/Purchased Electricity/386757
10.2d Reporting Period: From/To/Please break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by legal structure: Legal structure/Scope 2 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) No Response
11. Attachments NA NA NA
11. Further Information NA Electricity used at our generation stations which were self-generated is included in the summary of fuel purchased and consumed. This electricity is not however included in 10.1.a, as its emissions are actually accounted for under Scope 1, as the combust NA
11.1. What percentage of your total operational spend in the reporting year was on energy? More than 0% but less than or equal to 5% More than 50% but less than or equal to 55% More than 95% but less than or equal to 100%
11.2. Please state how much fuel, electricity, heat, steam, and cooling in MWh your organization has purchased and consumed during the reporting year: Energy type/MWh Fuel/9121447;Electricity/9635647;Heat/250313;Steam/4208;Cooling/959
11.3. Please complete the table by breaking down the total "Fuel" figure entered above by fuel type: Fuels/MWh Bituminous coal/1372080
11.4. Please provide details of the electricity, heat, steam or cooling amounts that were accounted at a low carbon emission factor: Basis for applying a low carbon emission factor/MWh associated with low carbon electricity, heat, steam or cooling Tracking instruments, RECS (USA)/17912
12. Attachments NA
12. Further Information NA
12.1. How do your absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year compare to the previous year? Increased
12.1a Reason of change Emissions reduction activities, Divestment, Acquisitions, Mergers, Change in output, Change in methodology, Change in boundary, Change in physical operating conditions, Unidentified, Other
12.1a. Reason: Emissions value (percentage) Emissions reduction activities: 5.74/Acquisitions: 6.15/Mergers: 164.88/Change in output: 4.38/
12.2. Please describe your gross combined Scope 1 and 2 emissions for the reporting year in metric tonnes CO2e per revenue: Intensity figure/Metric numerator/% change from previous year/Direction of change from previous year/Reason for change 0.0012/metric tonnes CO2e/22/Increase/The increase noted reflects approximately 24% reduction in revenue with only a 6.6% reduction in emissions when comparing the pro-forma performance of the companies as combined in 2011 as compared to the actual 2012 e
12.3. Please describe your gross combined Scope 1 and 2 emissions for the reporting year in metric tonnes CO2e per FTE: Intensity figure/Metric numerator/% change from previous year/Direction of change from previous year/Reason for change 1217.73/metric tonnes CO2e/14.6/Decrease/This intensity relates our year end 2012 employee count to our adjusted 2012 baseline, which is reflective of the full 2012 calendar year emissions of all emissions sources owned as of December 31, 2012. The compa
12.4. Please provide an additional intensity (normalized) metric that is appropriate to your business operations: Intensity figure/Metric numerator/% change from previous year/Direction of change from previous year/Reason for change 0.1296/metric tonnes CO2e/6.4/Decrease/This intensity rate is Exelon's 2012 actual Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions from our generation company over Exelon’s total 2012 generation. Exelon is presenting generation emissions as compared to MWh generated as it
13.1. Do you participate in any emissions trading schemes? Yes
13.1b. What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? Our overall impact from RGGI is positive since our fleet emission intensity is well below the regional average and therefore, the allowance cost adder turns out to result in a competitive advantage. Exelon’s required participation is associated with appli
13.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? Yes
14. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/sites/2013/13/6113/Investor CDP 2013/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2013/13.EmissionsTrading/Decin Project Certification.pdf NA
14. Further Information NA NA NA
14.1. Do you participate in any emission trading schemes? No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next two years Yes Yes
14.1b. What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? Our overall impact from RGGI is positive since our fleet emission intensity is well below the regional average and therefore, the allowance cost adder turns out to result in a competitive advantage. Exelon’s required participation is associated with appli
14.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? No Yes Yes
14.2. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 3 emissions Third party verification or assurance complete
14.2a. Please indicate the proportion of your Scope 3 emissions that are verified/assured More than 0% but less than or equal to 20%
14.3. Are you able to compare your Scope 3 emissions for the reporting year with those for the previous year for any sources? Yes
14.4. Do you engage with any of the elements of your value chain on GHG emissions and climate change strategies? (Tick all that apply) Yes, our suppliers; Yes, our customers; Yes, other partners in the value chain
14.4a. Please give details of methods of engagement, your strategy for prioritizing engagements and measures of success Exelon, along with fifteen other electric utilities participates in the Electric Utility Industry Sustainable Supply Chain Alliance (the Alliance), a 501(c)(6) non-profit organization that is registered as a “standards development organization” under the
14.4d. Please explain why not and any plans you have to develop an engagement strategy in the future NA
2. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/sites/2013/13/6113/Investor CDP 2013/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2013/2.Strategy/dwnld_politicalcontributions_2012_janjune.pdf NA
2. Further Information NA More information on Exelon's political contributions and political activities can be found on our website at: http://www.exeloncorp.com/performance/governance/overview.aspx More information on Exelon's policy positions can be found on our website at:ht NA
2.1. Please select the option that best describes your risk management procedures with regard to climate change risks and opportunities NA Integrated into multi-disciplinary company wide risk management processes NA
2.1a. Please provide further details i. The scope of the process/ the type of risks and opportunities considered: The Exelon Risk Management Process is now a standalone organization with a single management model that is applied consistently across the company to identify measure, prioritize
2.1a. Please provide further details (see guidance) NA i. The scope of the process/ the type of risks and opportunities considered: The Exelon Risk Management Process is now a standalone organization with a single management model that is applied consistently across the company to identify measure, prioritize NA
2.2. Is climate change integrated into your business strategy? No Yes Yes
2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes i. Our business strategy is continually influenced by our internal risk assessment process and our external involvement with our stakeholders. Exelon’s executive team recognizes global climate change as a compelling issue and that the electric industry h
2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes (see guidance) NA i. Our business strategy is continually influenced by our internal risk assessment process and our external involvement with our stakeholders. Exelon’s executive team recognizes global climate change as a compelling issue and that the electric industry h NA
2.2b. Please explain why not NA NA NA
2.3. Do you engage in activities that could either directly or indirectly influence policy on climate change through any of the following? (tick all that apply) Yes
2.3. Do you engage with policy makers to encourage further action on mitigation and/or adaptation? No Yes Yes
2.3a. On what issues have you been engaging directly?: Focus of legislation/Corporate Position/Details of engagement/Proposed solution Cap and trade/Support/Exelon supported the comprehensive two-year program review by the nine North-eastern and Mid-Atlantic states participating in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) to update the RGGI Model Rule and program requirements effect
2.3a. Please explain (i) the engagement process and (ii) actions you are advocating NA Exelon supported the comprehensive two-year program review by the nine North-eastern and Mid-Atlantic states participating in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) to update the RGGI Model Rule and program requirements effective 2014. Exelon work NA
2.3b. Are you on the Board of any trade associations or provide funding beyond membership? Yes
2.3c. Please enter the details of those trade associations that are likely to take a position on climate change legislation/Trade association Alliance for Retail Energy Markets///
2.3d. Do you publically disclose a list of all the research organizations that you fund? No
2.3e. Do you fund any research organizations to produce public work on climate change? Yes
2.3f. Please describe the work and how it aligns with your own strategy on climate change In 2012, Exelon and its operating companies invested more than $20.5 million dollars in research related to the advancement of the electrical industry, and/or environmental and climate change concerns. This research funding was primarily invested in Elec
2.3g. Please provide details of the other engagement activities that you undertake NA
2.3h. What processes do you have in place to ensure that all of your direct and indirect activities that influence policy are consistent with your overall climate change strategy? Exelon's Senior Vice President of Corporate Strategy and Chief Sustainability Officer coordinates with the Senior Vice Presidents in charge of federal and state regulatory and legislative activities to develop and coordinate the Corporation’s overall posi
2.3i. Please explain why you do not engage with policy makers NA
3. Attachments NA https://webadmin.cdproject.net/sites/2013/13/6113/Investor CDP 2013/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2013/3.TargetsandInitiatives/CEPSG-9088 WSSC Case Study Final.pdf NA
3. Further Information NA For the summary of projects listed in 3.3a, projects have been counted at the same level as listed in the subsequent section 3.3.b, with the exception for new development projects and uprates where a discrete count is available. For initiatives that appl NA
3.1. Did you have an emissions reduction target that was active (ongoing or reached completion) in the reporting year? No Absolute target Absolute and intensity targets
3.1a. Absolute target/ID/Scope/% of emissions in scope/% reduction from base year/Base year/Base year emissions (metric tonnes CO2e)/Target year/Comment 1/Scope 1+2+3/98/75/2001/15677978/2012/This goal is the combined 2012 performance targets associated with our Exelon 2020 program to reduce, offset or displace 15.7 million tonne CO2e by 2020. The 15.7 million metric tonnes target correlates to our 2001
3.1b. Intensity target/ID/Scope/% of emissions in scope/% reduction from base year/Metric/Base year/Normalized base year emissions/Target year/Comment No Response
3.1c. What change in absolute emissions this intensity target reflects/ID/Direction of change anticipated in absolute Scope 1+2 emissions at target completion?/% change anticipated in absolute Scope 1+2 emissions No Response
3.1d. Please provide details on your progress against this target made in the reporting year/ID/% complete (time)/% complete (emissions)/Comment 1/100/100/Despite challenges for our nuclear uprates program, actual emissions reductions due to coal plant retirements and mild temperatures, along with successful implementation of our customer abatement programs led to higher than projected performance
3.1e. Please explain (i) why not; and (ii) forecast how your emissions will change over the next five years NA NA NA
3.2. Does the use of your goods and/or services directly enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party? No Yes Yes
3.2a. Please provide details (see guidance) NA i. How the emissions are avoided: As a power producer, marketer and distributor, Exelon’s electricity and related services impact a wide variety of private consumers, businesses, manufacturers and government agencies. Everything that we do to reduce GHG NA
3.3. Did you have emissions reduction initiatives that were active within the reporting year (this can include those in the planning and/or implementation phases) No Yes Yes
3.3a. Please identify the total number of projects at each stage of development, and for those in theimplementation stages, the estimated CO2e savings/Stage of development/3.3a. Number of projects/Total estimated annual CO2e savings in metric tonnes CO2e Under investigation/25/
3.3c Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities. 0 13 13 Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities.
3.3c. What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities? NA Other, Compliance with regulatory requirements/standards, Dedicated budget for low carbon product R&D, Partnering with governments on technology development, Compliance with regulatory requirements/standards, Dedicated budget for low carbon product R&D, E NA
3.3c. What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities?/Comment Other/Method - Strategic Imperative: In 2008, Exelon developed the Exelon 2020 program which was based on a low-carbon business strategy. The program is designed to highlight where and how GHG reduction efforts can help to better position the company for
4. Attachments NA
4. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? - Further Information NA
4.1. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? 16 The number of corporate annual reports and voluntary publications (complete and/or underway) made about the company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance
5. Attachments NA NA NA
5. Further Information NA NA NA
5.1. Have you identified any climate change risks (current or future) that have potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Risks driven by changes in regulation; Risks driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA
5.1a. Climate change risks driven by changes in regulation Yes
5.1a. Please describe your risks driven by changes in regulation /ID/Risk driver/ Description/Potential impact/Timeframe/Direct/Indirect/Likelihood/Magnitude of impact 1/Uncertainty surrounding new regulation/Capital investments in the electric power generation sector tend to be very expensive and long-lived (e.g. 40 or more years for generation). The capital intensive nature of the power generation and transmission an
5.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk and (iii) the costs associated with these actions 1-4. i. This uncertainty in US regulatory developments challenges leaders trying to appropriately position their companies for future success. GHG regulations affecting new and existing power plants could impact the fuel and generation technology mix in t
5.1c. Climate change risks driven by change in physical climate parameters Yes
5.1c. Please describe your risks that are driven by change in physical climate parameters/ID/Risk driver/Description/Potential impact/Timeframe/Direct/Indirect/Likelihood/Magnitude of impact 1/Change in precipitation extremes and droughts/Changes in precipitation patterns could have a variety of effects including increased incidence of flooding due to an increase in extreme rain downpour events following extended periods of dry weather. Annu
5.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA 1i. Climate change could affect the availability of a secure and economical supply of water in some locations, which is essential for Exelon Generation’s continued operation, particularly for the cooling of generating units. Drought-like conditions can im NA
5.1e. Please describe your risks that are driven by changes in other climate-related developments/ID/Risk driver/Description/Potential impact/Timeframe/Direct/Indirect/Likelihood/Magnitude of impact PR4/Sea level rise/Could influence ocean currents and therefore fish and other marine life. Shore based organisms could be particularly vulnerable in the event of this occurring./Reduction/disruption in production capacity/6-10 years/Indirect (Supply cha
5.1e.Climate change risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments Yes
5.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA 1.i. Consumer behavior or regulatory requirements for collective reduction in energy use have the potential to reduce the demand for electricity, thereby impacting our overall financial performance.1.ii. Exelon has responded by establishing green energy p NA
5.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
5.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
5.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
6. Attachments NA https://webadmin.cdproject.net/sites/2013/13/6113/Investor CDP 2013/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2013/6.ClimateChangeOpportunities/NET Power Press Release FINAL 061512.pdf NA
6. Further Information NA NA NA
6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Opportunities driven by changes in regulation; Opportunities driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA
6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? -Transparency Yes
6.1a Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in regulation? NA Yes NA
6.1a. Please describe your opportunities that are driven by changes in regulation/ID/Opportunity driver/Description/Potential impact/Timeframe/Direct/Indirect/Likelihood/Magnitude of impact 1/International agreements/Exelon has limited international exposure with regards to its operations; however, it does have interests in an Activities Implemented Jointly (or AIJ) project in the city of Decin in the Czech Republic and in a REDD (Reduced Em
6.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity and (iii) the costs associated with these actions 1.i. Exelon’s opportunity for financial growth from carbon offset trading is limited as the US market has yet to develop. ii. Exelon has the rights to the Decin Bynov District Heating Plant projects carbon offsets, totaling 3880 tonnes in 2012.
6.1c. Please describe the opportunities that are driven by changes in physical climate parameters Yes
6.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity and (iii) the costs associated with these actions 1.i. In 2012, average wholesale electricity prices were just over $44 per MWh (PJM West market area). Should increases in precipitation cause river flows to increase, there could be the potential for increased hydroelectric generation. For example, a hyd
6.1e. Please describe the opportunities that are driven by changes in other climate-related developments Yes
6.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA 1.i. Increased efficiency of goods and services - Exelon procures over $3 billion in annual commodities and services, exclusive of fuel, to support its operations. Based on the size of Exelon’s purchases, even a small cost reduction, and/or increase in e NA
6.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
6.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
6.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
7. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/sites/2013/13/6113/Investor CDP 2013/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2013/7.EmissionsMethodology/Appendix B - Emissions Factor Summary.xlsx NA
7. Further Information NA Baseline has been revised. The emissions presented are the adjusted baseline that reflects all owned operations, for the full year of 2012, as of December 31, 2012. This baseline does not include assets that were acquired as part of the merger in 2012, NA
7.1. Please provide your base year and base year emissions (Scopes 1 and 2)/7.1. Base year From Date:/To Date:/ Scope 1 Base year emissions (metric tonnes CO2e)/N39Scope 2 Base year emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) 2012-01-01/2012-12-31/18830568/5726802
7.2. Please give the name of the standard, protocol or methodology you have used to collect activity data and calculate Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions NA The Climate Registry: General Reporting Protocol/The Climate Registry: Electric Power Sector (EPS) Protocol/US EPA Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule/The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (Revised Edition)/Other NA
7.3. Please give the source for the global warming potentials you have used Gas/Reference CO2/IPCC Second Assessment Report (SAR - 100 year)
7.4. Please give the emissions factors you have applied and their origin; alternatively, please attach an Excel spreadsheet with this data Fuel/Material/Energy/Emission Factor/Unit/Reference ///
8.1. Please select the boundary you are using for your Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas inventory NA Equity share NA Boundary used for Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas inventory during 2011-2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.2. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e NA Gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e for 2011 - 2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.2. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figures in metric tonnes CO2e 26038890
8.3. Please provide your gross global Scope 2 emissions figures in metric tonnes CO2e NA
8.4. Are there are any sources (e.g. facilities, specific GHGs, activities, geographies, etc.) of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions which are not included in your disclosure? NA Yes NA Proportion of Scope 1 emissions that are verified/assured for 2011 - 2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.4a Reporting Period From/To/Source/Scope/Explain why the source is excluded 1 Jan 2012/31 Dec 2012/Refrigerants for units of less than 50 pounds/Scope 1/Emissions associated with refrigerants for units with a capacity of less than 50 pounds (threshold for reporting under 40 CFR Part 82); Exelon believes that these emissions are m
8.5 Reporting Period From/To/Please estimate the uncertainty of the total gross global Scope 1 and 2 emissions figures that you have supplied and specify the sources of uncertainty in your data gathering, handling and calculations/Scope 1 emissions No Response
8.6. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 1 emissions Third party verification or assurance complete Proportion of Scope 1 emissions that are verified/assured for 2011 - 2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.6a. Please indicate the proportion of your Scope 1 emissions that are verified/assured More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% More than 90% but less than or equal to 100%
8.6b Reporting Period From/To/Please provide further details of the verification/assurance undertaken, and attach the relevant statements: Type of verification or assurance/Attach the document 1 Jan 2012/31 Dec 2012///https://www.cdproject.net/sites/2013/13/6113/Investor CDP 2013/Shared Documents/Attachments/Investor-8.6b-C3-RelevantStatement/Full Year Verification Letter 2012.pdf
2013 Performance Band E A A NA
2013 Score 0 98 100 NA
0. Attachments NA NA NA If you have not been presented with a sector module that you consider would be appropriate for your company to answer, please select the module below. If you wish to view the questions first, please see https://www.cdproject.net/en-US/Programmes/Pages/Mor
0. Further Information NA Exelon completed a merger with Constellation Energy on March 12, 2012. Emissions data reported in this response reflects the emissions for all facilities owned by Constellation and Exelon for the period of time they were owned by either Constellation or NA If you are in these sectors (according to the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS)), the corresponding sector modules will be marked as default options to your information request. If you want to query your classification, please email respond@c
0.1. Introduction - Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. NA Exelon Corporation (NYSE: EXC) is the nation’s leading competitive energy provider, with approximately $23 billion in annual revenues. Headquartered in Chicago, Exelon operates in 47 states, the District of Columbia and Canada. Exelon is the largest compe NA
0.1. Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. Exelon Corporation (NYSE: EXC) is the nation’s leading competitive energy provider, with approximately $23 billion in annual revenues. Headquartered in Chicago, Exelon operates in 47 states, the District of Columbia and Canada. Exelon is the largest compe
0.2. Please state the start and end date of the year for which you are reporting data. 2012-01-01
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
2014 Performance Band E A- A 2014 Performance Band
2014 Score 100 100 1 2014 Score
CDLI leader No Yes Yes The Climate Disclosure Leadership Index: A Company must: (1)   Make its response public and submit via CDP’s Online Response System (2) Achieve a score within the top 10% of the total regional sample population
Comment NA Comment
CPLI leader No No Yes The Climate Performance Leadership Inde: A company must: (1)Make its response public and submit via CDP’s Online Response System (2) Attain a performance score greater than (3) Disclose gross global Scope 1 and Scope 2 figures (4) Score maximum performanc
Scope 1 emissions 18696695 All greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions that are directly from sources that are owned or controlled by the reporting entity.
Scope 2 emissions 6269876 All indirect greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the consumption of purchased electricity, heat or steam. Indirect GHG emissions are a consequence of the activities of the reporting entity, but occur at sources owned or controlled by another entity.
Target(s) reported abs Absolute/Intensive
Ticker EXC Ticker
Verification/ assurance 123 Audit and verification by a competent and independent organization that uses a standardized set of terms and methods.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
2.1. Are you able to identify which of your operations are located in water-stressed regions? No Response 4 answers 4 answers NA
0.4. Exclusions Are there any geographies, activities, facilities or types of water inputs/outputs within this boundary which are not included in your disclosure? NA No NA NA
2.2b. You may explain here why you are not able to identify which of your operations are located in regions subject to water stress or water-related risk and whether you have plans to explore this issue in the future No Response 3 answers 3 answers NA
0.4aList of Exclusions & Reason for Exclusions-Transparency & Reporting No Response No Response Answered NA
1.1. Does your company have a water policy, strategy or management plan? No Yes Yes NA
2.1bPlease list the water-stressed regions where you have operations and the percentage of your total operations in that area NA NA NA NA
2.1bPlease list the water-stressed regions where you have operations and the percentage of your total operations in that area-Transparency & Reporting No Response No Response 4 answers NA
2.2. Do you use other indicators (besides water stress) to identify operations which are located in regions subject to water-related risk? NA NA NA NA
0.1. Introduction Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. NA On March 12, 2012 Exelon acquired Constellation Energy (NYSE:CEG) and became the largest competitive integrated energy provider in the United States. NA NA
0.2. Reporng Year Please state the start and end date of the year for which you are reporting data. 2.0. Enter the period that will be disclosed. NA 01-01-2011 - 31-12-2011 NA NA
0.3. Reporting Boundary Please indicate the category that describes the company, entities, or group for which you are reporting. NA Companies, entities or groups over which operational control is exercised. NA NA
2.3. Please specify the total percentage of your operations that are located in the regions at risk which you identified in questions 2.1 and/or 2.2 NA No NA NA
2.4. Please specify the basis you use to calculate the percentages used for questions 2.1 and/or 2.2 NA Other NA NA
1.1a. Please describe your policy, strategy or plan, including the highest level of responsibility for it within your company and its geographical reach-Transaprency & Reporting Australia/CCA's Water Policy covers all aspects of water related operations activities from both municipal and groundwater sources across the beverage and food businesses. United States of America/The Exelon board has delegated to its corporate governance committee authority to oversee Exelon’s strategies and efforts to protect and improve the quality of the environment, including, but not limited to, Exelon’s climate chang United States of America/We have a philosophy to limit water waste and a strategy to identify reduction opportunities from development through operations through supply chain. We build our stores to green building standards (LEED and Green Globes), and e NA
1.1b. Does the policy, strategy or plan specify water reduction, quality or efficiency targets or other water-related goals? NA Local NA NA
1.1bDoes the water policy, strategy or plan specify water-related targets or goals? No Yes Yes NA
0.4aList of Exclusions & Reason for Exclusions NA NA NA NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
0.2. Reporting Year 2012-01-01
0.3. Reporting Boundary Companies, entities or groups over which operational control is exercised
0.4. Are there any geographies, activities, facilities or types of water inputs/outputs within this boundary which are not included in your disclosure? No
0.4a. List of Exclusions & Reason for Exclusions-Transparency & Reporting NA
0.4a. List of Exclusions & Reason for Exclusions-Transparency & Reporting (value) NA
1.1. Does your company have a water policy, strategy or management plan? No Yes Yes
1.1a. Please describe your policy, strategy or plan, including the highest level of responsibility for it within your company and its geographical reach-Transaprency & Reporting Australia/CCA's Water Policy covers all aspects of water related operations activities from both municipal and groundwater sources across the beverage and food businesses. 2 answers United States of America/We have a philosophy to limit water waste and a strategy to identify reduction opportunities from development through operations through supply chain. We build our stores to green building standards (LEED and Green Globes), and e
1.1a. Please describe your policy, strategy or plan, including the highest level of responsibility for it within your company and its geographical reach-Transaprency & Reporting (value) United States of America/The Exelon board has delegated to its corporate governance committee authority to oversee Exelon’s strategies and efforts to protect and improve the quality of the environment, including, but not limited to, Exelon’s climate chang
1.1b. Does the water policy, strategy or plan specify water-related targets or goals? Yes
1.1c. Description of Target/goal, its type and geographical reach -Transparency & Reporting 3 answers
1.1c. Description of Target/goal, its type and geographical reach -Transparency & Reporting (value) #NAME?
1.1d. You may explain here why your company does not have a water policy, strategy or plan and if you intend to put one in place. NA
1.2. What specific actions has your company taken to manage water resources or engage stakeholders in water-related issues and what are their outcomes?-Transparency & Reporting 2 answers
1.2. What specific actions has your company taken to manage water resources or engage stakeholders in water-related issues and what are their outcomes?-Transparency & Reporting (value) #NAME?
2.1. Are any of your operations located in water-stressed regions? Yes
2.1a. Please specify the method(s) you use to characterize water-stressed regions- Environmental policy & Reporting WRI
2.1a. Please specify the method(s) you use to characterize water-stressed regions- Environmental policy & Reporting (value) #NAME?
2.1b. Please list the water-stressed regions where you have operations and the percentage of your total operations in that area-Transparency & Reporting 2 answers
2.1b. Please list the water-stressed regions where you have operations and the percentage of your total operations in that area-Transparency & Reporting (value) #NAME?
2.2. Are there other indicators (besides water stress) which you wish to report that help you to identify which of your operations are located in regions subject to water-related risk? Yes
2.2a. Please list the relevant risk indicator of your total operations in that area-Environment Policy and Reporting #NAME?
2.2b. You may explain here why you do not wish to report or why you do not use other indicators to identify which of your operations are located in regions subject to water-related risk. NA
2.3. Please specify the total proportion of your operations that are located in the regions at risk which you identified in questions 2.1 and/or 2.2. 0 86 99
2.4. The basis to use to calculate the percentages used for questions 2.1 and/or 2.2 2 answers
2.4. The basis to use to calculate the percentages used for questions 2.1 and/or 2.3 (value) #NAME?
2.5. Do any of your key inputs or raw materials (excluding water) come from regions subject to water-related risk? Yes
2.5a. Please state or estimate the percentage of your key water-intensive inputs (excluding water) that come from these regions-Transparency & Reporting #NAME?
2.5b. You may explain here why you are not able to identify if any of your key inputs or raw materials come from regions subject to water-related risk and whether you have plans to explore this issue in the future. NA
3.1. Is your company exposed to water-related risks (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure? Yes
3.1a. Please describe the current and/or future risks to your operations, the ways in which these risks affect or could affect your operations and your current or proposed strategies for managing them-Transparency & Reporting 3 answers
3.1a. Please describe the current and/or future risks to your operations, the ways in which these risks affect or could affect your operations and your current or proposed strategies for managing them-Transparency & Reporting (value) #NAME?
3.1b. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to any water-related risks that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure. NA
3.1c. Please explain why you do not know if your company is exposed to any water-related risks that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure, and your plans to assess this risk in the future. NA
3.2. Country or geographical scale-Environment Policy & Reporting Other:
3.2. What methodology do you use to analyze water-related risk across your operations?-Transparency & Reporting Answered
3.2. What methodology do you use to analyze water-related risk across your operations? Water scarcity can have a sizeable impact on our manufacturing operations. Although we do not need as much water as some other industries, we use water in many key manufacturing processes in our plants. We cannot be certain that we will always have access
3.3. Do you require your key suppliers to report on their water use, risks and management? Yes
3.4. Is your supply chain exposed to water-related risks (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure? No
3.4b. Please explain why you do not consider your supply chain to be exposed to any water-related risks that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure. Over 90 % of Exelon’s commodities spend is on non-fuel goods and services which are secured from U.S. domestic companies. Less than 10 % of Exelon’s spend is on goods and services from non-domestic sources for which there are identified alternative suppl
3.4c. Please explain why you do not know if your supply chain is exposed to water-related risks that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure, and your plans to assess this risk in the future. NA
4.1. Has your business experienced any detrimental impacts related to water in the past five years? Yes
4.1. Please describe any detrimental impacts to business related to water your company has faced in the past five years, their financial impacts and whether they have resulted in any changes to company practices- Transparency & Reporting Answered
5.1. Do water-related issues present opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure? Yes
5.1a. Please describe the current and/or future opportunities, the ways in which these opportunities affect or could affect your operations and your current or proposed strategies for exploiting them-Environmental Policy & Reporting 3 answers
5.1a. Please describe the current and/or future opportunities, the ways in which these opportunities affect or could affect your operations and your current or proposed strategies for exploiting them-Environmental Policy & Reporting (value) #NAME?
5.1b. Please explain why you do not consider water-related issues to present opportunities to your company that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure or supply chain. NA
5.1c. Please explain why you do not know whether water-related issues present opportunities to your company that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure. NA
6.1. Has your company identified any linkages or trade-offs between water and carbon emissions in its operations or supply chain? Yes
6.1a. Please describe the linkages or trade-offs between water and carbon emissions in its operations or supply chain?--Transparency & Reporting 2 answers
6.1a. Please describe the linkages or trade-offs and the related management policy or action between water and carbon emissions in its operations or supply chain?-Transparency & Reporting (value) #NAME?
7.1. Are you able to provide data, whether measured or estimated, on water withdrawals within your operations? Yes
7.1a. Please report the water withdrawals within your operations for the reporting year-Transparency & Reporting 0
7.1a. Please report the water withdrawals within your operations for the reporting year-Transparency & Reporting (value) 0
7.1b. Please explain why you are not able to provide data for water withdrawals. NA
7.2. Are you able to provide data, whether measured or estimated, on water recycling/reuse within your operations? Yes
7.2a. Please report the water recycling/reuse within your operations for the reporting year-Transparency & Reporting 3 answers
7.2a. Please report the water recycling/reuse within your operations for the reporting year-Transparency & Reporting (value) #NAME?
7.2b. Please explain why you are not able to provide data for water recycling/reuse within your operations. NA
7.2b. Please explain why you are not able to provide data for water recycling/reuse within your operations-Transparency & Reporting No Response
7.3. Please use this space to describe the methodologies used for questions 7.1 and 7.2 or to report withdrawals or recycling/reuse in a different format to that set out above. Water use data is based on water bills or intake/outfall meter data when available. Where no metering is available, estimates have been developed based on design parameters and engineering/operations knowledge of the systems. Single-pass cooling water w
7.3. Please use this space to describe the methodologies used for questions 7.1 and 7.2 or to report withdrawals or recycling/reuse in a different format to that set out above-Transparency & Reporting Answered
7.4. Are any water sources significantly affected by your company's withdrawal of water? Yes
7.4a. Please list any water sources significantly affected by your company's withdrawal of water. #NAME?
7.4b. You may explain here why your company's withrawal of water does not significantly affect any water sources. NA
7.4b. You may explain here why your company's withrawal of water does not significantly affect any water sources-Transparency & reporting No Response
7.4c. Please explain why you do not know if any water sources are significantly affected by your company's withdrawal of water. NA
8.1. Are you able to identify discharges of water from your operations by destination, by treatment method and by quantity and quality using standard effluent parameters? Yes
8.1a. Please explain why you are not able to identify discharges from your operations by destination, treatment method , quantity and quality, and whether you have any plans to put in place systems that would enable you to do so. NA NA
8.2. Did your company pay any penalties or fines for significant breaches of discharge agreements or regulations in the reporting period? Yes NA
8.2a. Please describe the quality, quantity and destination of the water that was the subject of the significant breach(es), the associated fines and any actions taken to minimise the risk of future non-compliance #NAME? NA
8.3. Are any water bodies and related habitats significantly affected by discharges of water or runoff from your operations? Yes NA
8.3a. Please list any water bodies and related habitats which are significantly affected by discharge of water or runoff from your operations #NAME? NA
8.3b. You may explain here why your company's discharge of water does not significantly affect any water bodies or associated habitats. NA NA
8.3b. You may explain here why your company's discharge of water does not significantly affect any water bodies or related habitats-Tansparency & Reporting No Response NA
8.3c. Please explain why you do not know if any water bodies and associated habitats are significantly affected by discharge of water or runoff from your operations. NA NA
9.1. Please provide any available financial intensity values for your company's water use across its operations 3 answers NA
9.1. Please provide any available financial intensity values for your company's water use across its operations (value) #NAME? NA
9.2. Please provide any available water intensity values for your company's products or services across its operations. #NAME? NA
Please enter the name of the individual that has signed off (approved) the response and their job title William J. Brady Exelon Corporation Director, Corporate Environmental Strategy Corporate Strategy & Exelon 2020 NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
2014 CEI Rating 100 NA
Firm-wide Organizational Competency Programs (10 points) Yes Yes NA
Fortune 1000 850 145 1 NA
Has Employer-Supported Employee Resource Group OR Firm-Wide Diversity Council (10 points) Yes Yes NA
Has Parity Across Other “Soft” Benefits for Partners (10 points) Yes Yes NA
Headquarters Location Chicago, Il NA
Offers Partner Health/Medical Insurance (15 points) Yes Yes NA
Offers Transgender-Inclusive Health Insurance Coverage (10 points) Yes Yes NA
Positively Engages the External LGBT Community (15 points) Yes Yes NA
Prohibits Discrimination Based on Gender Identity or Expression (15 points) Yes Yes NA
Prohibits Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation (15 points) Yes Yes NA
Responsible Citizenship Employers will have 25 points deducted from their score for a large-scale official or public anti-LGBT blemish on their recent records (-25 points) NA Yes NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Disclosure (Percent of Max 23 points) 0 91 100 NA
Grand Total (Percent of Max 69 points) 0 81 100 NA
Policies (Percent of Max 18 points) 0 89 100 NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Rank 1 99 100 NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Reported Scope 3 Total (tCO2e) 670000000 37000 0 Indicated the total reported Scope 3 (all other indirect emissions) of the company in metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent (tCO2e) as defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol. Where no Scope 3 emissions are reported, this is recorded as "No Data"
Scope 1+2 Intensity 11162.43 641.62 0.3 Intensity is calculated by adding together a company's Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions and dividing by its turnover.
Global 800 Carbon Rank 800 263 1 Carbon Ranking of 800 international companies. Ranking is determined by EIO Methodology. See Source Info sheet for comments on it
No. of Scope 3 Categories Reported 1 2 15 This column indicates the number of Scope 3 Categories reported. Once placed into one of the four Disclosure Categories, companies are ranked by the number of Scope 3 categories disclosed.
Reported Scope 1+2 Total (tCO2e) 282000000 12142000 843 The total reported Scope 1 (all direct emissions) and Scope 2 (indirect electricity emissions) of the company in metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent (tCO2e) as defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol
Accepted or Inferred Scope 3 Intensity 8547.13 2610.97 64.51 Unless the company reports all 15 Scope 3 categories as defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Standard, an inferred figure based on the highest reported intensity for that sector, across the Global ET Universe, is shown
Category No Public Data Yellow Public, Complete, and Verified data Companies are placed into one of four data or 'disclosure' categories: 1) Public, Complete, and Verified data; 2) Public, Complete, and Unverified data; 3) Public, Incomplete, Verified or Unverified data; 4) No Public Data
Combined Scope 1+2+3 Intensity 12161.68 1947.11 34.24 Combined Scope 1+2_3 Intensity is calculated by adding together a company's Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions at 100% (disclosed or inferred) + 50% of Scope 3 emissions (disclosed or inferred).
Market Value ($Million) 1667.87 25385 358143.1 A company's market value, or market capitalism (number of shares times x share price). This value was taken on 23.08.2011
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Sum of Biogenic CO2 emissions 2.9 NA 23623772.5 Total biogenic CO2 emissions.
Sum of CO2 emissions (non-biogenic) 0.3 25664.7 53858607.2 Total non-biogenic CO2 emissions
Sum of Gases with No Listed GWP (metric tons) 0.3397 NA 1036.4
Sum of HFC emissions 2558.79 NA 19215.8
Sum of HFE emissions NA NA
Sum of Methane (CH4) emissions 0.21 751.38 2491216.14 Total methane emissions
Sum of NF3 emissions 5332 NA 21231.68
Sum of Nitrous Oxide (N2O) emissions 0.31 5.27 10675387.54
Sum of PFC emissions 33930.1 NA 1221318.27
Sum of SF6 emissions 4254.2 NA 153581.4
Total reported direct emissions 30.03 26421.35 54200390.452 Total emissions of CO2 and other gases in metric tons.
Industry Description NA NA Description of the type of industry the facility serves.
Is Some CO2 captured on-site and therefore not emitted? N NA Y Indicates if all CO2 is emitted or if some is sequestered.
Number of reporting facilities 1 1 50 Number of facilities reported to the EPA.
Percentage of facilities that emit pollutants 2 100 100 Percent of reporting facilities that emit pollutants other than CO2.
Percentage of facilities that employ continuous emissions monitoring 6 100 100
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
ceo:numberOfRatings 1 0 4026 The number of ratings of the CEO
ceo:pctApprove 0 0 100 Percent of ratings of the CEO that were approving
ceo:title NA The title of the company's CEO
employer:numberOfRatings 1 58 6549 The number of Glassdoor users who have rated this company as a place to work.
Glassdoor Employer Ratings 1 3.5 5 The Top Companies for Work-Life Balance list is based on employee feedback shared in company reviews on Glassdoor.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Executive Diversity 0 0.33 0.41 Percentage of officers and directors that are female.
Percentage of Profit 0 0.006 1.086 Percentage of profit donated.
Rank 500 217 1 NA
Toxicity produced 773771631 5928967 0 In pounds.
Toxicity released 113515588 2274681 0 In pounds.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Guidelines NA GRI - G3.1 NA This field indicates which version of the GRI Guidelines is used for the reporting. As of publication year 2009, GRI only includes reporting that makes use of the G3 Guidelines, which were released in October 2006.
Integrated No No Yes GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
Publication Year 2013 GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
Region NA Northern America NA Region the organization operates in.
Report Html Address NA http://www.exeloncorp.com/assets/newsroom/docs/csr/index.html NA URL of the report location.
Report Pdf Address NA http://www.exeloncorp.com/assets/newsroom/downloads/docs/dwnld_Exelon_CSR.pdf NA Location of a PDF version of the report.
Report Title NA 2012 Exelon Corporation Sustainability Report NA Title of the report.
Sector NA Energy Utilities NA Industry sector.
Sector Supplements (Final) NA Electric Utilities NA This field indicates if the reporting organization has made use of one of the final Sector Supplements and which one. If ‘not used’ is indicated, it means that one of the final Sector Supplements is applicable, but has not been used. If ‘not applicable’ i
Size NA Large NA GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Disclosure 0 83.1 100 Environmental disclosure was included as a stand-alone score to assess each company’s transparency with regard to its environmental performance. Specifically, this score evaluates the breadth and quality of company environmen
Green Score 21.4 48.6 82.9 NA
Envtl. Mgmt. 21.3 59.2 91.9 Based on an analysis of companies tracked in Sustainalytics’ Global Platform, the Environmental Management Score is an assessment of how a company manages its environmental performance through policies, programs, targets, certifications, and the like. To
Envtl. Impact 0 30.4 89 Based on data compiled by Trucost, this is a comprehensive, quantitative, and standardized measurement of the overall environmental impact of a company’s global operations. More than 700 metrics—including emissions of nine key greenhouse gases, water use,
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Carbon Productivity 0.003 0.41 0.97 GHG Productivity defined as Revenue ($US) / Total Greenhouse gas (GHG) Emissions (CO2e).
Energy Productivity 0.021 0.122 0.971 Energy Productivity defined as Revenue ($US) / Total Energy Consumption (GJ).
Newsweek Green Score 0.014 0.529 0.851 This score is derived from the following component scores: an Energy Productivity,Carbon Productivity, Water Productivity, Waste Productivity, Reputation, Pay Link, Sustainability Themed Committee, Audit ; weighted at 45 percent, 45 percent, and 10 percen
Pay Link No Yes Yes A mechanism to link the remuneration of any member of a company's senior executive team with the achievement of environmental performance targets.
Rank 500 61 1
Reputation 0.005 0.669 1.0 The Reputation score is made up of two components: (1) The RepRisk Index, which is a quantitative measure that captures criticism and quantifies a company exposure to ESG risks. (2) The second component is based on the number of environmental issues that
Sustainability Themed Committee No Yes Yes The existence of a committee at the Board of Directors level whose mandate is related to the sustainability of the company, including but not limited to environmental matters.
Waste Productivity 0.014 0.723 0.97 Waste Productivity is defined as Revenue ($US) / [Total waste generated (metric tonnes) – waste recycled/reused (metric tonnes)].
Water Productivity 0.028 0.049 0.992 Water Productivity is defined as Revenue ($US) / Total water use (m3).
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Envtl. Mgmt. 28.6 59.2 91.9 Based on an analysis of companies tracked in Sustainalytics’ Global Platform, the Environmental Management Score is an assessment of how a company manages its environmental performance through policies, programs, targets, certifications, and the like. To
Green Score 0 48.6 100 NA
Rank 500 426 1 NA
Disclosure 0 83.1 100 Environmental disclosure was included as a stand-alone score to assess each company’s transparency with regard to its environmental performance. Specifically, this score evaluates the breadth and quality of company environmen
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Carbon Productivity 0.015 0.41 0.963 GHG Productivity defined as Revenue ($US) / Total Greenhouse gas (GHG) Emissions (CO2e).
Energy Productivity 0.007 0.122 0.957 Energy Productivity defined as Revenue ($US) / Total Energy Consumption (GJ).
Newsweek Green Score 0.0 0.529 0.843 This score is derived from the following component scores: an Energy Productivity,Carbon Productivity, Water Productivity, Waste Productivity, Reputation, Pay Link, Sustainability Themed Committee, Audit ; weighted at 45 percent, 45 percent, and 10 percen
Pay Link No Yes Yes A mechanism to link the remuneration of any member of a company's senior executive team with the achievement of environmental performance targets.
Rank 500 116 1
Reputation 0.005 0.669 1 The Reputation score is made up of two components: (1) The RepRisk Index, which is a quantitative measure that captures criticism and quantifies a company exposure to ESG risks. (2) The second component is based on the number of environmental issues that
Sustainability Themed Committee No Yes Yes The existence of a committee at the Board of Directors level whose mandate is related to the sustainability of the company, including but not limited to environmental matters.
Waste Productivity 0.014 0.723 0.97 Waste Productivity is defined as Revenue ($US) / [Total waste generated (metric tonnes) – waste recycled/reused (metric tonnes)].
Water Productivity 0.012 0.049 0.992 Water Productivity is defined as Revenue ($US) / Total water use (m3).
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Corporate Governance 3 0 0 The scores for each ESG scope issue ranges from 0-3. The scoring refers to the number of times the company was criticized in relation to that scope issue: 0 = little or no exposure in the past 4 years; 1 = 5 direct relations in the past 4 years; 2 = 10 direct relations in the past 4 years; 3 = 20 direct relations in the past 4 years.
Current RRI 86 22 0 The RepRisk Index (RRI) is a quantitative risk measure that captures criticism and quantifies a company's exposure to controversial environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues. It does not measure a company's overall reputation, but rather is an indicator of their reputational risk.The Current RRI value indicates the current level of criticism about a company.
Employee Relations 3 0.6 0 The scores for each ESG scope issue ranges from 0-3. The scoring refers to the number of times the company was criticized in relation to that scope issue: 0 = little or no exposure in the past 4 years; 1 = 5 direct relations in the past 4 years; 2 = 10 direct relations in the past 4 years; 3 = 20 direct relations in the past 4 years.
Environmental FootPrint 3 2.2 0 The scores for each ESG scope issue ranges from 0-3. The scoring refers to the number of times the company was criticized in relation to that scope issue: 0 = little or no exposure in the past 4 years; 1 = 5 direct relations in the past 4 years; 2 = 10 direct relations in the past 4 years; 3 = 20 direct relations in the past 4 years.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Rank 400 N/R 1 REPORTWATCH RATING
Report Rating D C A REPORTWATCH RATING
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Women's Business Enterprise National Council (WBENC)
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Weighted score 1.2 3.0 5.9

Flags

(Other Indicators - things that don’t affect ratings but that help identify or classify companies)

SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
You have put report(s) in your cart
Go to my cart
Ok