CSRHub is the world’s largest CSR (corporate social responsibility) and sustainability ratings and information database.

Ericsson is a world-leading provider of telecommunications equipment and related services to mobile and fixed network operators worldwide. The Company provides communications networks, telecom services and multimedia solutions to clients in more than 175 countries on a global scale. Ericsson was established in 1876. It’s parent company, Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson, is headquartered in Stockholm, Sweden.

Ticker: ERIC B-SK ISIN: SE0000108656
Address: Torshamnsgatan 23 Kista , Sweden , Stockholm , , 164 83 Website: Ericsson
Phone #: 1-212-6854030 CSR Web Area: SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Basic Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Ratings

  Overall Community Employees Environment Governance
Ericsson 65 62 67 70 60
Communications Equipment Manufacturing
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Telecommunications
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
All company average 55 55 56 58 52
Sweden
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Percentile Rankings

Rankings are in percentile terms, compared to other companies in the same industry and country Overall Community Employees Environment Governance
Ericsson 94% 79% 84% 87% 75%
Communications Equipment Manufacturing
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Telecommunications
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Sweden
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Special Issues:

Ratings History

Only subscribers can interact with the graph.

More CSR Rating Details

  Community Employees
Community Dev & Philanthropy Product Human Rights & Supply Chain Compensation & Benefits Diversity & Labor Rights Training, Health & Safety
Ericsson
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Communications Equipment Manufacturing
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Telecommunications
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
All company average 53 54 55 58 55 55
Sweden
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Environment Governance
Energy & Climate Change Environmant Policy & Reporting Resource Management Board Leadership Ethics Transparency & Reporting
Ericsson
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Communications Equipment Manufacturing
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Telecommunications
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
All company average 57 58 57 50 55 51
Sweden
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Percentile rankings

Rankings are in percentile terms, compared to other companies in the same industry and country Community Employees
Community Dev & Philantrophy Product Human Rights & Supply Chain Compensation & Benefits Diversity & Labor Rights Training, Health & Safety
Ericsson
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Communications Equipment Manufacturing
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Telecommunications
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Sweden
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Environment Governance
Energy & Climate Change Environment Policy & Reporting Resource Management Board Leadership Ethics Transparency & Reporting
Ericsson
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Communications Equipment Manufacturing
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Telecommunications
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Sweden
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

0 Special Issues Affect This Company (see a list of issues here)

# of Sources
Communications Equipment Manufacturing
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Telecommunications
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Overall database
Sweden
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

CSRHub Has 60 Data Sources (33 Are Currently Active) for This Company

= sources impacting the current ratings
= sources not impacting the current ratings, but included in earlier ratings for this company
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO

Original Data Values

(unsubscribed users can see the list, subscribers can see the data details for most sources)

Data source name

Data source element name Minimum value Value provided by datasource Maximum value Data description
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Brand Value / Enterprise Value (%) -48.164682123 0.2095 316.6056 NA
Brand Value 2012 2887.5634 NA
BSI 50 65.3117 88.4717 NA
Domicile SWEDEN NA
Enterprise Value NA 11648.2769 NA NA
Reviewed ? YES NA
Sector Communications NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Brand Value 2013 11.095 5404.9682 67875.2014 NA
BSI 50 68.3289 89.6275 NA
Domicile SWEDEN NA
Sector Communications NA
Reviewed RK NA
Brand Rating 2013 BBB AA- AAA+ NA
Enterprise Value 2013 0 20988.7565 435750.9811
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Brand Value / Enterprise Value (%) 0.009 0.214 1.07 NA
Brand Value 2014 10 7133.2498 87304 A brand strength is assessed by using our Brand Strength Index framework. This benchmarks the strength, risk and future potential of a brand relative to its competitors by assessing input measures, brand equity measures, and output performance across four
BSI 51.3 77.2642 94.2 NA
Domicile SWEDEN NA
Enterprise Value 2014 66 34604.6775 526619 NA
Sector Communications NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
0. Further Information NA For more information please see Ericsson Annual Report 2011 NA NA
0.1. Introduction - Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. NA Ericsson is a world's leading provider of communications technology and services. We are enabling the Networked Society with efficient real-time solutions that allow us to study, work and live our lives more freely, in sustainable societies around the wor NA NA
5.1e Identified climate change risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments? NA Yes NA NA
5.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA Risks are broadly categorized into industry and market risks, commercial risks, operational risks, and compliance risks. 1.- Climate change risk management is an integrated part of the Ericsson Group Management System (EGMS). The Ericsson Group Environme NA NA
5.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
5.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
5.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
6. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/11/5811/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/6.ClimateChangeOpportunities/mobile_weather_alert.pdf NA NA
6. Further Information NA NA NA NA
6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Opportunities driven by changes in regulation; Opportunities driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA NA
6.1a Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in regulation? NA Yes NA NA
6.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA Ericsson utilizes the competitive advantages that are gained through global scale and has implemented common processes and IT tools across all operational units worldwide. Customer requirements are identified, clarified and formalized in Ericsson Business NA NA
6.1c Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in physical climate parameters? NA Yes NA NA
14. Attachments NA NA NA NA
6.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA Ericsson utilizes the competitive advantages that are gained through global scale and has implemented common processes and IT tools across all operational units worldwide. Customer requirements are identified, clarified and formalized in Ericsson Business NA NA
6.1e Identified opportunities that are driven by changes in other climate-related developments? NA Yes NA NA
6.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA Ericsson utilizes the competitive advantages that are gained through global scale and has implemented common processes and IT tools across all operational units worldwide. Customer requirements are identified, clarified and formalized in Ericsson Business NA NA
13. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/11/5811/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/13.EmissionsPerformance/Ericsson KPI Environmental 2011.pdf NA NA
11. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/11/5811/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/11.EmissionsScope2Contractual/Ericsson Italy - certificato_Ericsson.pdf NA NA
11. Further Information NA NA NA NA
11.1. Do you consider that the grid average factors used to report Scope 2 emissions in Question 8.3 reflect the contractual arrangements you have with electricity suppliers? NA Yes NA NA
11.1a. You may report a total contractual Scope 2 figure in response to this question. Please provide your total global contractual Scope 2 GHG emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 0 NA 17902000 NA
11.2. Has your organization retired any certificates, e.g. Renewable Energy Certificates, associated with zero or low carbon electricity within the reporting year or has this been done on your behalf? NA Yes NA NA
3.1e. Please explain (i) why not; and (ii) forecast how your emissions will change over the next five years NA NA NA NA
3.2. Does the use of your goods and/or services directly enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party? No Yes Yes NA
3.2a. Please provide details (see guidance) NA Two examples highlighted below demonstrate how our goods and/or services directly enable the reduction of GHG emissions. We have not considered, generating certified emission reductions (CERs) or emission reduction units (ERUs) within the framework of the NA NA
3.3c Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities. 0 3 12 NA
3.3c. What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities? NA Dedicated budget for other emission reduction activities, Employee engagement, Financial optimization calculations NA NA
5. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/11/5811/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/5.ClimateChangeRisks/Ericsson 2011_corporate_responsibility_and_sustainability_report.pdf NA NA
5. Further Information NA NA NA NA
5.1. Have you identified any climate change risks (current or future) that have potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Risks driven by changes in regulation; Risks driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA NA
5.1a Identified risks driven by changes in regulation? NA NA NA NA
5.1b. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA Risks are broadly categorized into industry and market risks, commercial risks, operational risks and compliance risks. 1.- Climate change risk management is an integrated part of the Ericsson Group Management System (EGMS). The Ericsson Group Environme NA NA
14. Further Information NA NA NA NA
1.1. Where is the highest level of direct responsibility for climate change within your company? No individual or committee with overall responsibility for climate change Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board NA
1.1a. Please identify the position of the individual or name of the committee with this responsibility NA Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility Vice President NA NA
1.2. Do you provide incentives for the management of climate change issues, including the attainment of targets? No Yes Yes NA
13. Further Information NA Ericsson absolute emissions (scope 1 and scope 2 combined) have increased by approximately 27% for the reporting year (2011), hence the implementation of Emission Reduction Activities (ERA). There are two reasons for this change from last year, the first NA NA
13.1. How do your absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year compare to the previous year? Increased Increased Decreased NA
13.1a (i) If absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) have increased, decreased or remained the same overall compared to the previous year, state direction of change NA General Increase NA NA
13.1a (ii) If absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) have increased, decreased or remained the same overall compared to the previous year, state the reason for the direction of change NA Increase: Emissions reduction activities, Increase: Other, Decrease: Other NA NA
13.1a (iii) If emissions have increased, decreased or remained the same overall, provide the emissions value (%) NA Decrease: , Increase: 595 , Emission value for which direction is not stated: NA NA
2012 Score 0 74 100 NA
2012 Performance Band E C A NA
2.3a. Please explain (i) the engagement process and (ii) actions you are advocating NA Our engagement with governments takes place during meetings with governmental bodies on relevant issues (i.e. climate change, socio-economic development, MDGs, broadband policy etc). One example is the annual Regulators Seminar which we hold each June, a NA NA
8.8. Are carbon dioxide emissions from the combustion of biologically sequestered carbon (i.e. carbon dioxide emissions from burning biomass/biofuels) relevant to your company? No Yes Yes NA
8.8a. Please provide the emissions in metric tonnes CO2e 0.01 2000 27263000 NA
Management 4. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/11/5811/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/4.Communication/Building Cities for the Networked Society .pdf NA NA
Management 4. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? NA 8 NA NA
5.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA Risks are broadly categorized into industry and market risks, commercial risks, operational risks and compliance risks. 1.- Climate change risk management is an integrated part of the Ericsson Group Management System (EGMS). The Ericsson Group Environment NA NA
2. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/11/5811/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/2.Strategy/GeSI Transformative Step of the Day.pdf NA NA
2. Further Information NA NA NA NA
5.1c Identified climate change risks driven by change in physical climate parameters? NA Yes NA NA
2.1. Please select the option that best describes your risk management procedures with regard to climate change risks and opportunities NA Integrated into multi-disciplinary company wide risk management processes NA NA
2.1a. Please provide further details (see guidance) NA Ericsson´s overall business strategy includes sustainability as one of the core functional strategies covering all Ericsson activities. One of the key focus areas of the strategy is energy use and climate change. The Sustainability Strategy process includ NA NA
2.2. Is climate change integrated into your business strategy? No Yes Yes NA
2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes (see guidance) NA Ericsson´s overall business strategy includes sustainability as one of the core functional strategies. One of the key focus areas of the strategy is energy use and climate change. To develop the Sustainability Strategy, a present situation analysis and SW NA NA
2.2b. Please explain why not NA NA NA NA
2.3. Do you engage with policy makers to encourage further action on mitigation and/or adaptation? No Yes Yes NA
3. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/11/5811/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/3.TargetsandInitiatives/Ericsson GRI environmental-performance-2011.pdf NA NA
3. Further Information NA NA NA NA
3.1. Did you have an emissions reduction target that was active (ongoing or reached completion) in the reporting year? No Intensity target Absolute and intensity targets NA
14.1. Do you participate in any emission trading schemes? No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next two years No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next two years Yes NA
14.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? No No Yes NA
6.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
6.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
6.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA NA
7. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/Sites/2012/11/5811/Investor CDP 2012/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2012/7.EmissionsMethodology/Ericsson_Annual Report_2011_en.pdf NA NA
7. Further Information NA For more information please see Annual Report 2011 (Page 38-39), Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility (Page 18-23) and Ericsson Environmental KPI. Please see also for base year emission information 2008 Ericsson Environmental Key Performance Indica NA NA
7.1. Please provide your base year and base year emissions (Scopes 1 and 2) NA NA NA NA
0.4. Currency selection Please select the currency in which you would like to submit your response. All financial information contained in the response should be in this currency. NA SEK NA NA
1. Attachments NA NA NA NA
1. Further Information NA NA NA NA
8.7. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 2 emissions More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% NA More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% NA
11.1b. Explain the basis of the alternative figure (see guidance) NA NA
14.1b. What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? NA NA
8.1. Please select the boundary you are using for your Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas inventory NA NA NA NA
8.2a. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 92 NA 231902967 NA
8.3a. Please provide your gross global Scope 2 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e 293 NA 8071070 NA
8.4. Are there are any sources (e.g. facilities, specific GHGs, activities, geographies, etc.) of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions which are not included in your disclosure? NA No NA NA
8.6. Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 1 emissions More than 0% but less than or equal to 20% NA More than 90% but less than or equal to 100% NA
Carbon Disclosure Project 2013 Full Data
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
8.8a. Please provide the emissions in metric tonnes CO2e 0.05 NA 13638000
0.4. Currency selection Please select the currency in which you would like to submit your response. All financial information contained in the response should be in this currency. SEK
0.6. Modules NA As part of the Investor CDP information request, electric utilities, companies with electric utility activities or assets, companies in the automobile or auto component manufacture sectors and companies in the oil and gas industry should complete suppleme
1. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/sites/2013/11/5811/Investor CDP 2013/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2013/1.Governance/Ericsson-Organization.pdf NA
1. Further Information NA NA NA
1.1. Where is the highest level of direct responsibility for climate change within your company? No individual or committee with overall responsibility for climate change Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board Individual/Sub-set of the Board or other committee appointed by the Board
1.2. Do you provide incentives for the management of climate change issues, including the attainment of targets? No Yes Yes
11. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/sites/2013/11/5811/Investor CDP 2013/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2013/11.Energy/Ericsson-Annual-Report-2012-en.pdf NA
11. Further Information NA For more information please see Annual Report 2012 (Page 41-42), Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility Report 2012 (Page 24-25) and Ericsson Environmental KPI. For further details see attachments:Ericsson-Annual-Report-2012-en.pdfEricsson-Sustainabi NA
11.1. What percentage of your total operational spend in the reporting year was on energy? More than 0% but less than or equal to 5% More than 0% but less than or equal to 5% More than 95% but less than or equal to 100%
12. Attachments https://www.cdproject.net/sites/2013/11/5811/Investor CDP 2013/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2013/12.EmissionsPerformance/Ericsson-Environmental-Performance-2012-en.pdf
12. Further Information For more information please see Annual Report 2012 (Page 41-42), Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility Report 2012 (Page 24-25) and Ericsson Environmental KPI. For further details see attachments:Ericsson-Annual-Report-2012-en.pdfEricsson-Sustainabi
12.1. How do your absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year compare to the previous year? Increased
12.1a Reason of change Emissions reduction activities, Divestment, Acquisitions, Mergers, Change in output, Change in methodology, Change in boundary, Change in physical operating conditions, Unidentified, Other
14. Attachments NA NA NA
14. Further Information NA NA NA
14.1. Do you participate in any emission trading schemes? No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next two years No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next 2 years Yes
14.1b. What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating? NA
14.2. Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period? No No Yes
2. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/sites/2013/11/5811/Investor CDP 2013/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2013/2.Strategy/Ericsson-Annual-Report-2012-en.pdf NA
2. Further Information NA NA NA
2.1. Please select the option that best describes your risk management procedures with regard to climate change risks and opportunities NA Integrated into multi-disciplinary company wide risk management processes NA
2.1a. Please provide further details (see guidance) NA i) Ericsson´s overall business strategy includes sustainability as one of the core functional strategies covering all Ericsson activities. The business strategy process includes risks and opportunities. One of the key focus areas of the strategy is energy NA
2.2. Is climate change integrated into your business strategy? No Yes Yes
2.2a. Please describe the process and outcomes (see guidance) NA i) In our strategy work we collect information in our Situation Analysis phase of the strategy work. We collect info from both external and internal sources via our external and internal business intelligence network, from academia, business units, custom NA
2.2b. Please explain why not NA NA NA
2.3. Do you engage in activities that could either directly or indirectly influence policy on climate change through any of the following? (tick all that apply) Yes
2.3a. Please explain (i) the engagement process and (ii) actions you are advocating NA In the ICT industry, global standards are fundamental to ubiquitous connectivity. Globally standardized technologies ensure worldwide interoperability between networks, devices, and network operators. Ericsson is uniquely positioned as a leader in the d NA
2.3b. Are you on the Board of any trade associations or provide funding beyond membership? NA
2.3d. Do you publically disclose a list of all the research organizations that you fund? Yes
3. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/sites/2013/11/5811/Investor CDP 2013/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2013/3.TargetsandInitiatives/Ericsson-Annual-Report-2012-en.pdf NA
3. Further Information NA NA NA
3.1. Did you have an emissions reduction target that was active (ongoing or reached completion) in the reporting year? No Intensity target Absolute and intensity targets
3.1e. Please explain (i) why not; and (ii) forecast how your emissions will change over the next five years NA NA NA
3.2. Does the use of your goods and/or services directly enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party? No Yes Yes
3.2a. Please provide details (see guidance) NA i), ii) Smart meter solutions in Australia. The results show that the total annual impact per customer – for one meter per household – is about 65kg of CO2e. Of thisamount, electricity use during operation accounts for 80 percent, or about 53kg CO2e. The NA
3.3c Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities. 0 3 13 Number of methods used to drive investment in emissions reduction activities.
3.3c. What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities? NA Financial optimization calculations, Employee engagement, Financial optimization calculations NA
4. Attachments https://www.cdproject.net/sites/2013/11/5811/Investor CDP 2013/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2013/4.Communication/BD-bbcomm-climate.pdf
4. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? - Further Information https://www.cdproject.net/sites/2013/11/5811/Investor CDP 2013/Shared Documents/Attachments/Investor-4.1-C3-IdentifytAttachment/Investor-4.1-PublishedInformation3/Ericsson-Environmental-Performance-2012-en.pdf
4.1. Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in other places than in your CDP response? 5 The number of corporate annual reports and voluntary publications (complete and/or underway) made about the company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance
5. Attachments NA NA NA
5. Further Information NA NA NA
5.1. Have you identified any climate change risks (current or future) that have potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Risks driven by changes in regulation; Risks driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA
5.1a. Climate change risks driven by changes in regulation Yes
5.1c. Climate change risks driven by change in physical climate parameters Yes
5.1d. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA PR 02 i)  The 2011 and 2012 drought, the worst in over 60 years with five regions, in Somalia declared famine zones, has made hundreds of thousands of Somalis to leave their homes searching for food. ii) Disaster from drought can be reduced with suppor NA
5.1e.Climate change risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments Yes
5.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA OR 02 ii and iii) Within Ericson we have a voluntary employee program that includes 140 employees. Ericsson Response engages in disasters on request by UN and International Federation Red Cross help agencies ii) and iii) ii) Ericsson has partnered with Re NA
5.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
5.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
5.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
6. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/sites/2013/11/5811/Investor CDP 2013/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2013/6.ClimateChangeOpportunities/2012_corporate_responsibility_and_sustainability_report.pdf NA
6. Further Information NA NA NA
6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply NA Opportunities driven by changes in regulation; Opportunities driven by changes in physical climate parameters; Opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments NA
6.1. Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? -Transparency Yes
6.1a Identified climate change opportunities that are driven by changes in regulation? NA Yes NA
6.1c. Please describe the opportunities that are driven by changes in physical climate parameters Yes
6.1e. Please describe the opportunities that are driven by changes in other climate-related developments Yes
6.1f. Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions NA OO 02 ii) Ericsson has partnered with Refugees United and developed a free, mobile and online platform that allows people to search for missing family members, friends, and relatives on a safe and anonymous basis. i) The goal is to reach 1 million refugg NA
6.1g. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
6.1h. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
6.1i. Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure NA NA NA
7. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/sites/2013/11/5811/Investor CDP 2013/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2013/7.EmissionsMethodology/Ericsson-Environmental-Performance-2012-en.pdf NA
7. Further Information NA For more information please see Annual Report 2012 (Page 41-42), Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility Report 2012 (Page 24-25) and Ericsson Environmental KPI. For further details see attachments:Ericsson-Annual-Report-2012-en.pdf Ericsson-Sustainab NA
8.2. Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e NA Gross global Scope 1 emissions figure in metric tonnes CO2e for 2011 - 2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
8.3. Please provide your gross global Scope 2 emissions figures in metric tonnes CO2e NA
8.4. Are there are any sources (e.g. facilities, specific GHGs, activities, geographies, etc.) of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions which are not included in your disclosure? NA No NA Proportion of Scope 1 emissions that are verified/assured for 2011 - 2012/01 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012 reporting period
2013 Performance Band E B A NA
2013 Score 0 85 100 NA
0. Attachments NA https://www.cdproject.net/sites/2013/11/5811/Investor CDP 2013/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2013/Introduction/Ericsson-Annual-Report-2012-en.pdf NA If you have not been presented with a sector module that you consider would be appropriate for your company to answer, please select the module below. If you wish to view the questions first, please see https://www.cdproject.net/en-US/Programmes/Pages/Mor
0. Further Information NA NA NA If you are in these sectors (according to the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS)), the corresponding sector modules will be marked as default options to your information request. If you want to query your classification, please email respond@c
0.1. Introduction - Please give a general description and introduction to your organization. NA Ericsson is a world's leading provider of communications technology and services. We are enabling the Networked Society with efficient real-time solutions that allow us to study, work and live our lives more freely, in sustainable societies around the wor NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Rank by Context-Based Score (1 to 100) 100 64 1 Climate counts rank
Sustainable N N Y If a company has a score of less than or equal to one (?1), it is considered “sustainable”, whereas a company with a score greater than one (>1) is considered “unsustainable”
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Reported Scope 3 Total (tCO2e) 670000000 585000 0 Indicated the total reported Scope 3 (all other indirect emissions) of the company in metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent (tCO2e) as defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol. Where no Scope 3 emissions are reported, this is recorded as "No Data"
Scope 1+2 Intensity 11162.43 9.09 0.3 Intensity is calculated by adding together a company's Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions and dividing by its turnover.
Global 800 Carbon Rank 800 25 1 Carbon Ranking of 800 international companies. Ranking is determined by EIO Methodology. See Source Info sheet for comments on it
No. of Scope 3 Categories Reported 1 4 15 This column indicates the number of Scope 3 Categories reported. Once placed into one of the four Disclosure Categories, companies are ranked by the number of Scope 3 categories disclosed.
Reported Scope 1+2 Total (tCO2e) 282000000 317200 843 The total reported Scope 1 (all direct emissions) and Scope 2 (indirect electricity emissions) of the company in metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent (tCO2e) as defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol
Accepted or Inferred Scope 3 Intensity 8547.13 314.82 64.51 Unless the company reports all 15 Scope 3 categories as defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Standard, an inferred figure based on the highest reported intensity for that sector, across the Global ET Universe, is shown
Category No Public Data Green Public, Complete, and Verified data Companies are placed into one of four data or 'disclosure' categories: 1) Public, Complete, and Verified data; 2) Public, Complete, and Unverified data; 3) Public, Incomplete, Verified or Unverified data; 4) No Public Data
Combined Scope 1+2+3 Intensity 12161.68 166.5 34.24 Combined Scope 1+2_3 Intensity is calculated by adding together a company's Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions at 100% (disclosed or inferred) + 50% of Scope 3 emissions (disclosed or inferred).
Market Value ($Million) 1667.87 30454 358143.1 A company's market value, or market capitalism (number of shares times x share price). This value was taken on 23.08.2011
Ekobai B2B Directory
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Description NA Description of the company's product.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
ceo:numberOfRatings 1 692 4026 The number of ratings of the CEO
ceo:pctApprove 0 89 100 Percent of ratings of the CEO that were approving
ceo:title NA The title of the company's CEO
employer:numberOfRatings 1 1265 6549 The number of Glassdoor users who have rated this company as a place to work.
Glassdoor Employer Ratings 1 3.6 5 The Top Companies for Work-Life Balance list is based on employee feedback shared in company reviews on Glassdoor.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
CO2 Productivity 607.9556 133832.6164 5209401.5137 NA
Leadership Diversity 0 0.25 0.5 NA
Rank 100 30 1 NA
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Guidelines NA GRI - G3 NA This field indicates which version of the GRI Guidelines is used for the reporting. As of publication year 2009, GRI only includes reporting that makes use of the G3 Guidelines, which were released in October 2006.
Integrated No No Yes GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
Publication Year 2013 GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
Region NA Europe NA Region the organization operates in.
Report Html Address NA http://www.ericsson.com/thecompany/sustainability_corporateresponsibility NA URL of the report location.
Report Pdf Address NA http://www.ericsson.com/res/thecompany/docs/corporate-responsibility/2012/2012_corporate_responsibility_and_sustainability_report.pdf NA Location of a PDF version of the report.
Report Title NA Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility Report 2012 NA Title of the report.
Sector NA Telecommunications NA Industry sector.
Sector Supplements (Final) NA Not Applicable NA This field indicates if the reporting organization has made use of one of the final Sector Supplements and which one. If ‘not used’ is indicated, it means that one of the final Sector Supplements is applicable, but has not been used. If ‘not applicable’ i
Size NA Large NA GRI currently has two classifications for defining organization size: 'SME' and 'Large'. SME stands for Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. GRI follows the definition for SMEs as set by the European Union: SMEs have 250 employees or less and have a yearl
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Envtl. Mgmt. 28.6 77.7 91.9 Based on an analysis of companies tracked in Sustainalytics’ Global Platform, the Environmental Management Score is an assessment of how a company manages its environmental performance through policies, programs, targets, certifications, and the like. To
Green Score 0 73.5 100 NA
Rank 500 46 1 NA
Disclosure 0 78.4 100 Environmental disclosure was included as a stand-alone score to assess each company’s transparency with regard to its environmental performance. Specifically, this score evaluates the breadth and quality of company environmen
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Carbon Productivity 0.015 0.64 0.963 GHG Productivity defined as Revenue ($US) / Total Greenhouse gas (GHG) Emissions (CO2e).
Energy Productivity 0.007 0.606 0.957 Energy Productivity defined as Revenue ($US) / Total Energy Consumption (GJ).
Newsweek Green Score 0.0 0.64 0.843 This score is derived from the following component scores: an Energy Productivity,Carbon Productivity, Water Productivity, Waste Productivity, Reputation, Pay Link, Sustainability Themed Committee, Audit ; weighted at 45 percent, 45 percent, and 10 percen
Pay Link No Yes Yes A mechanism to link the remuneration of any member of a company's senior executive team with the achievement of environmental performance targets.
Rank 500 40 1
Reputation 0.005 0.449 1 The Reputation score is made up of two components: (1) The RepRisk Index, which is a quantitative measure that captures criticism and quantifies a company exposure to ESG risks. (2) The second component is based on the number of environmental issues that
Sustainability Themed Committee No Yes Yes The existence of a committee at the Board of Directors level whose mandate is related to the sustainability of the company, including but not limited to environmental matters.
Waste Productivity 0.014 0.461 0.97 Waste Productivity is defined as Revenue ($US) / [Total waste generated (metric tonnes) – waste recycled/reused (metric tonnes)].
Water Productivity 0.012 0.628 0.992 Water Productivity is defined as Revenue ($US) / Total water use (m3).
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Corporate Governance 3 1.4 0 The scores for each ESG scope issue ranges from 0-3. The scoring refers to the number of times the company was criticized in relation to that scope issue: 0 = little or no exposure in the past 4 years; 1 = 5 direct relations in the past 4 years; 2 = 10 direct relations in the past 4 years; 3 = 20 direct relations in the past 4 years.
Current RRI 86 24 0 The RepRisk Index (RRI) is a quantitative risk measure that captures criticism and quantifies a company's exposure to controversial environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues. It does not measure a company's overall reputation, but rather is an indicator of their reputational risk.The Current RRI value indicates the current level of criticism about a company.
Employee Relations 3 0.2 0 The scores for each ESG scope issue ranges from 0-3. The scoring refers to the number of times the company was criticized in relation to that scope issue: 0 = little or no exposure in the past 4 years; 1 = 5 direct relations in the past 4 years; 2 = 10 direct relations in the past 4 years; 3 = 20 direct relations in the past 4 years.
Environmental FootPrint 3 0.8 0 The scores for each ESG scope issue ranges from 0-3. The scoring refers to the number of times the company was criticized in relation to that scope issue: 0 = little or no exposure in the past 4 years; 1 = 5 direct relations in the past 4 years; 2 = 10 direct relations in the past 4 years; 3 = 20 direct relations in the past 4 years.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Rank 400 21 1 REPORTWATCH RATING
Report Rating D A- A REPORTWATCH RATING
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Value of USG Contracts (in millions) 990 119 1 Value of Iranian contracts.
Withdrawn NA Was the association with Iran withdrawn?
Nationality Sweden Country the company is in.
On the list Yes Yes Is the company on the list.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
include_measurement 0 1 1 Does your COP identify targets, define performance indicators and measure outcomes?
references_anti_corruption 0 1 1 Does your COP contain description of actions, and when relevant policies, related to anti-corruption?
references_environment 0 1 1 Does your COP contain description of actions, and when relevant policies, related to the environment?
references_human_rights 0 1 1 Does your COP contain description of actions, and when relevant policies, related to human rights?
references_labour 0 1 1 Does your COP contain description of actions, and when relevant policies, related to labour rights?
starts_on NA 05/01/2012 NA Start Date
differentiation NA advanced NA At what level is the declarer?
ends_on NA 05/01/2013 NA End Date
format NA sustainability_report NA How is your COP shared with stakeholders?
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
ends_on NA 05/01/2014 NA End Date
format NA sustainability_report NA How is your COP shared with stakeholders?
include_continued_support_statement 0 1 1 Does your COP contain a statement by the CEO (or equivalent) expressing continued support for the Global Compact and renewing your company’s ongoing commitment to the initiative and its principles?
include_measurement 0 1 1 Does your COP identify targets, define performance indicators and measure outcomes?
references_anti_corruption 0 1 1 Does your COP contain description of actions, and when relevant policies, related to anti-corruption?
references_environment 0 1 1 Does your COP contain description of actions, and when relevant policies, related to the environment?
references_human_rights 0 1 1 Does your COP contain description of actions, and when relevant policies, related to human rights?
references_labour 0 1 1 Does your COP contain description of actions, and when relevant policies, related to labour rights?
starts_on NA 05/01/2013 NA Start Date
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
IT Rank 30 9 1 The most attractive employers in the IT field.
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
WeGreen
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
Weighted score 1.2 3.7 5.9

Flags

(Other Indicators - things that don’t affect ratings but that help identify or classify companies)

SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
SUBSCRIPTION INFO
You have put report(s) in your cart
Go to my cart
Ok